Home News Tamerlan and the CIA

Tamerlan and the CIA

14
In the background photo, Tamerlan is on the L and Jahar on the R. (Adapted photo credit – Thomas Brown)

by Mary W Maxwell

Today, April 20 in Australia, April 19 in the US, is the fifth anniversary of the death-in-custody of Tamerlan Tsarnaev. It was  a Friday morning.

Some people say Tamerlan worked for, or with, the CIA. I have no way to check on that. I mean, do any of us have the “right” to know if he worked for the CIA?

The title of this article refers to something different. It refers to the Wikipedia article below. Wikipedia is based on the CIA records known as National Estimates. They never get a name or date wrong. After all, they have the records.

As for the trash they put out in the contents of the articles, it must not be glossed over by us. The story they tell of the bomber, Tamerlan, is outrageous – the more so because written by the CIA. I will grant that it is “perfectly legal” to write that Jahar carjacked a guy, shot a cop, bombed the Marathon, etc.  Even though I know those things are not true, a jury did say they were true.

But no jury ever cogitated on the case of Tamerlan. He was never charged with anything. This is a massive slander.

In any case I print the offending article here now to demonstrate yet another false narrative, like the one about Martin Bryant at Port Arthur — and to say we have GOT TO STOP this.

I am grateful that Theresa May made such a botch-up of the Skripal case – goes to show how flagrant are the lies of government.

Here is Wiki:  See how many lies you can count.

Tamerlan Tsarnaev

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This name uses Eastern Slavic naming customs; the patronymic is Anzorovich and the family name is Tsarnaev.   Тамерлан Анзорович Царнаев

Tamerlan Anzorovich Tsarnaev, born October 21, 1986 –Died April 19, 2013), was a terrorist of Chechen descent who, with his brother Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, planted bombs at the Boston Marathon on April 15, 2013.The bombings killed three people and reportedly injured as many as 264 others. Tsarnaev was of half-Chechen and half-Avar descent He came to the United States in 2004.

At the time of the bombings, Tsarnaev was an aspiring boxer who authorities believe had recently become a follower of Islamic extremism.

Shortly after the Federal Bureau of Investigation declared them suspects in the bombings and released images of them, the Tsarnaev brothers killed an MIT policeman, carjacked an SUV, and engaged in a shootout with the police in the Boston suburb of Watertown.

According to the federal indictment, during the shootout Tsarnaev was captured but died, partly as a result of his brother driving over him, and an MBTA police officer was critically injured in the course of Dzhokhar’s escape in the SUV (the latter by what may have been friendly fire).

An injured Dzhokhar escaped, but was found, arrested, and hospitalized on the evening of April 19 after an unprecedented manhunt in which thousands of police searched a 20-block area of Watertown.

During his incarceration, Tsarnaev’s brother allegedly said during questioning that the pair next intended to detonate explosives in Times Square in New York City.  Dzhokhar reportedly also said to authorities that he and his brother were radicalized, at least in part, by watching Anwar al-Awlaki lectures.

ABC reported on April 23, 2013, that authorities linked Tsarnaev to an unsolved triple homicide in nearby Waltham that took place around the 10th anniversary of the September 11 attacks.

 

Mary W Maxwell is author of Marathon Bombing: Indicting the Players. On January 23, 2018 she lectured at the Watertown Library. Here is the unexpurgated version:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ilxGeCxMHLQ&t=2041s

SHARE

14 COMMENTS

  1. 12 blatant lies, and it was absolutely determined officially that Donohue was shot and injured by friendly fire. I wonder why they call it friendly. Is there anything friendly about being shot no matter who shoots you. They knew soon after that it was cops, but kept that secret until after Dzhokhar’s trial so the public would falsely believe that the brothers shot Donohue.The media BS this week in boston was out of control sickening, still promoting the lies enabling them to continue the secrecy of the truth. Thanks Mary, for continuing to keep this travesty in the public eye.

  2. I have a right ti say the CIA being or having infiltrated Tavistock, London, supplird LSD to this organization including RD Laing, and this was distributed by therapist councilors and others and this was a drug supplied by one member to me from Tavistock as all part of a experiment in mind control on the innocent who having no allegance to any political party and most likely because of this became victims.

    • Dear Don, they assaulted you with the drug. How can they escape punishment?

      I know of two people, dob 1944 and 1955, who were given LSD in college and have spent the rest of their lives in and out of mental hospitals.

      Where is the anger? Where is the law? Where is Academia? I believe records of this came out in Frank Olson’s (family’s) law suit. I assume you can sue.

      In any case you have Gumshoe’s sympathy.

      • That experimentation is widely conceded but it doesn’t exactly tee up with those birth dates.

        My understanding is that, after Timothy Leary began promoting the stuff as a tool of personal enlightenment(from1960 on), the poor old spooks had to deal with more “volunteers” than they’d bargained for.

          • By the late sixties the stuff was freely available throughout Aus; I remember one young guy who could no longer even speak. In short an unabashed attempt to engineer society from within had very quickly turned into an embarrassingly uncontrollable global infection.

            If you see a semi-trailer hurtling down the road with the driver asleep at the wheel you need to get out of the way and warn others. Power isn’t necessarily synonymous with control

  3. What more could you expect from a source that claims political neutrality ?

    The mother of all lies would have to be the idea that any form of knowledge can be inculcated in a vacuum. Wikipedia is OK for some things, so long as you know how to read between the lines

    • Extreme scepticism should be exercised re ANY article that’s held together by Newspeak. Words such as “terrorist” and “authorities” are classic red lights

  4. Dear People of Boston, look how easy it is to speak truth as long as you have a modicum of supporters. (see video of 9-11 Truthers below).

    I know there are many people who realize Tamerlan was killed for no reason. Why don’t you meet on the State House steps every Sunday at 2pm and video yourselves. I am sure your Beantown neighbors will feel MUCH more inclined to come around to truth if they see not just one individual here and there but see a GROUP.

    At 14 mins on this video we see a lady who collects 91– “tiles” from anyone and curates them. You could start a collection of little yellow post-it notes with signatures. “The Marathon Wailing Wall.”
    .

  5. Berry says, above:

    “If you see a semi-trailer hurtling down the road with the driver asleep at the wheel you need to get out of the way and warn others. Power isn’t necessarily synonymous with control.”

    Berry, just think how many things the Bozos are doing to the biosphere that they will never be able to remedy. A great loss of control — as naturally there would be, because they are not succeeding. Yes they’re “successfully” destructive but they are not successful in keeping the peeps quiet.

    There’s Gumshoe, for example.

  6. Re Cheryl’s comment on Ric Donohue friendly fire. And now I have something to thank Wikipedia for — seriously. i was going to tell Cheryl that the Court correctly hit Jahar with the death of Donohue EVEN IF IT WAS A COP HITTING ANOTHER COP — on the doctrine of “common purpose”. So i googled “common purpose, criminal law” and I see that there has been a change in the law which i did not know about. It affects M’assachusetts but I don’t know about federal law. Anyway it is worth a read. The following is from Wikipedia:

    “The doctrine of common purpose, common design, joint enterprise, or joint criminal enterprise is a common law legal doctrine that imputes criminal liability to the participants in a criminal enterprise for all that results from that enterprise. A common application of the rule is to impute criminal liability for wounding a person to participants in a riot who knew, or were reckless as to knowing, that one of their number had a knife and might use it, despite the fact that the other participants did not have knives themselves.

    “In England and Wales and certain other Commonwealth countries, this was the understanding of the courts until February 2016, when the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom and the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council jointly ruled that it was wrong, and that nothing less than intent to assist the crime would do.

    “The common purpose doctrine was established in England and Wales, and later adopted in other common law jurisdictions including Scotland, Ireland, Australia, Trinidad and Tobago, the Solomon Islands, Texas, Massachusetts, the International Criminal Court, and the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia.”

    Wait’ll I tell Jahar.

C'mon Leave a Reply, Debate and Add to the Discussion

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.