by Dee McLachlan
For the last year Gumshoe has been looking into the strange practices of the Family Court (which is federal, except in WA) and the State “child protection” agencies. One thing that has emerged is the frequency with which a protective parent, usually a Mum, is found to be an “emotional abuser.” Unbelievably that is often the justification for her child being removed from her. In fact, in 2015/16, there were over 20,000 cases in Australia.
My interpretation of the accusations against Mum is that: 1) This is a way of taking attention off the perpetrator — the real abuser — by building a case that the mother is “bad for the child.” And 2) The court then becomes the arena where the mother can be hurt (discredited, insults), and frustrated so badly — that she will lose her ability to fight.
(Referencing sexual abuse cases, it appears that most of the charges of emotional abuse of a child are leveled at Mums not Dads. When leveled at a Dad, if he be innocent, I am sure the pain is as great, but here I will continue from the example in Part 1, and emphasize the way it is done to the mother.)
First, a quick look at some statistics.
Surprising Statistics in Child Abuse
How many Australian children would you guess to be “in care” at the moment? Maybe, at a stretch, five thousand? No. Nationally, a total of 56, 412 kids, in 2018, were not in their homes. They were put into Out of Home Care (OOHC). This is a staggering increase — in 2014 there were 45, 746, and of course in the 20th century the numbers were far, far less.
Why this continued rise?
Using Western Australia as an example, let us compare some historical data from the Australian Institute for Family Studies (AIFS). The changes in categories (2016 figures based on substantiated figures) from 1989 to 2016 are:
- Physical abuse — decreased from 30% to 18%
- Sexual abuse — substantiations more than halve, from 36% to 16%
- Neglect — fairly constant at ~30% to 28%
- Emotional Abuse — INCREASES from ~3% to now 37% (over a 1,200%)
There’s something awry here. Now emotional abuse is the MAJOR factor for the removal of kids. As I wrote, “There’s a New Game in Town — Emotional Abuse,” with 45% of all abuse being attributed to emotional abuse.
What is Emotional Abuse?
Sometimes called ‘emotional maltreatment’, and ‘psychological harm’, the Queensland Department of Child Safety, and other government sites define Emotional Abuse when a child’s social, emotional, cognitive or intellectual development is impaired or threatened — and is likely to damage a child’s self-esteem or social competence. According to a popular conception it takes five main forms:
- rejecting: making the child feel worthless
- isolating: cutting a child off from normal social experiences, and friendships
- terrorising: verbal assaults, bulling, frightening, and hostility
- ignoring: stifling emotional growth and intellectual development
- corrupting: ‘mis-socialising’ the child, reinforcing destructive behaviour, deviance
The Incentive to Discredit a Protective Mother?
Child abuse is a heinous crime and being caught can result in jail and being ostracized from society. Offenders getting punished once a case is in Family Court proceedings seems to be exceptionally low, but there are individuals who are made examples of. Recently (17 May 2019) an Adelaide man (Ruecha Tokputzout) who had abused multiple babies and children was sentenced to more than 40 years in prison, with a non-parole period of 28 years. District Court Judge Liesl Chapman called the South Australian man’s actions depraved, saying, “You are a child’s worst nightmare, you are every parent’s horror, you are a menace to the community… ”
So there would be a huge incentive to re-direct blame if a child begins to disclose sexual abuse. So, now to reveal the big deception.
Counter Claim Tactics (Gaslighting)
People will go to extreme efforts to discredit a protective mother. A favourite tactic is gaslighting (which I covered in Part 1) — to accuse the partner of being psychotic and delusion, or a “coacher.”
Once discovered, it is common that the offender call a mental health unit, and the mother may be whisked off to a hospital for a mental health assessment. The mother is then assessed whilst still reeling from the abuse disclosures. My guess is that most pass, but the mere fact that they were “taken” or “ordered” for a mental health assessment is ammunition in a later report to create suspicions.
I will discuss judicial and other tactics in Part 3, but often an application in Family Court for sole custody is made, and the mother is now facing possibly years of trying to prove her sanity and emotional stability. Again, I do not deny that there are mothers that neglect and abuse their kids, but in this article I expose a specific tactic that can be easily identified. And it has most likely happened to hundreds, possibly thousands of mothers.
Passing the Baton
If the offender is calculated and persuasive enough, the tables quickly turn in his (or her) favour.
The child protection department steps in and removes the child from the mother. The baton is passed from the offender to the department staff social workers, and eventually to the prosecutor. I hear that most of the social workers are women, who by their gender are able to attack a women’s mental state more freely, than say would a man alone. With the child now in OOHC or living with the abuser, the odds are stacked heavily against the now-single mum who has to challenge a half-billion dollar (or more) tax-payer-resourced department. I have been told that the departments attempt to win at all costs.
The trashing begins. I have gathered very specific knowledge over the last 10 months, and there is a smorgasbord of tactics to choose from.
Trashing Tactics
These are some of ways in whicha good loving mother is discredited and turned into a poor one — deeming her a danger:
(1) Mental Disorders: The first port of call is to accuse the mother of a psychiatric disorder, and that she suffers from delusions and psychosis. (I have even come across mental health records being accessed and changed.) The department might write this up, for example, as “concerns for the mother’s mental health, and that she may be suffering from a psychotic disorder,” (only may be?), or “There is sufficient cause to believe the mother suffers from delusions that her child has been abused, and we fear this may impact the mental health of the child…” etc.
The mother is sent off for mental health assessments (often to department-prescribed practitioners). However, if there are no obvious signs of a disorder, the offender and the department can move onto to the many other accusations on offer.
(2) Parent Alienation Syndrome: This used to be a favourite. Richard Gardner, MD (who died in 2003) pushed the Parental Alienation Syndrome theory. Psychologists like Rickard Bell made a career claiming mothers were trying to alienate their children from the other parent. He usually advocated the removal of the children from a loving parent, so children could “rethink their decision.” Bell boasted on the ABC of having assessed 2000 cases in Australia. [Update: I’ve had a few emails about this. Parents might use this in disputes — but I am referring to specific cases where it is used to compete with evidence of sexual abuse. In fact the court removing a child from a loving parent is a version of this and could be termed ‘Judicial Alienation Syndrome’ as it the court that is doing the alienation.]
(3) Coaching: This has been used in many cases, where a department claims the abuse never happened (i.e., the abuse was an invention, and then theatrics by the child). This is especially the case when the mother was the first person to report the abuse, and it is written up, for example, as “The mother coached the child, making the child believe he/she was abused.” This is obviously a very serious accusation as this would psychologically harm the child. (Research shows this is very rare, and it is generally easy for an investigative specialist to establish coaching through language use, sentence structure, and behaviour.) But I have known coaching to be used, even where specialists have said the mother could never have coached.
(4) Fixated and False Allegations: I believe inflammatory wording is being used to discredit the mother. For example, by using the word fixated, it subconsciously suggests the mother is “looney” in some way, and that there is something suspiciously wrong with her. Word association is used to imply wrongdoing, e.g., “…the mother has a fixated view and therefore is a risk of emotionally abusing her child...” (But often, it is the department that has a fixated view in not wanting to believe the child.)
There seems to be a symbiotic relationship between the department social workers and the psychiatrists and psychologists providing mental health and parenting assessments. Many professionals rely and depend on work streaming in from the department. If they feel that a specific outcome is desired by the department, it is unlikely that they would constantly oppose the department’s view? I believe there are many “experts” making careers out of facilitating poor (unsubstantiated) outcomes.
However, if the above (1 – 4) are proved difficult to prove, there are more:
(5) Pressuring and Leading: This accusation is used when there are no coaching or obvious mental health issues. If the child has spoken up about abuse, the accusation could be then be that, “the mother pressured her child to disclose the abuse…” The implication is that “pressuring” or “leading” the child to speak up is unhealthy (even dangerous). It is very different to coaching, and completely ignores the argument that if the mother is pressuring the child to speak up, there is an assumption that abuse must have then happened. (It’s not coaching, but the abuse is never addressed.) The assumption in the report is that it is “bad” for a mother to make her child speak up about “bad” things. Could that not also be considered good parenting?
And now for the most deceptive and destructive accusation of all: Emotional Abuse. I covered (above) the definition, which is rejecting, terrorising, corrupting, etc. But that is NOT what child protection departments seem to define as emotional abuse. It is twisted on its head, and any action — even a nurturing action — can be construed as harmful to the child. To explain:
(6) Emotional Abuse: This seems to be the flavour of the decade. So easy for anyone to make an accusation, yet almost impossible to disprove. It is truly the most deceptive way to remove children. All that is needed is for the department to demonstrate, for example, that the child was tearful in front of the mother during supervised visitation. I cite one example: The young child was exceptionally distressed at having been separated from her mother and put into someone else’s care. As one would expecy, during the one hour supervised visitation, the child, on seeing her mum, becomes tearful and upset. The social worker writes that “the child was distressed and tearful on seeing her mother.” This access report can later be twisted against a good mum by the social worker writing (or prosecutor saying), “the mother has a negative impact of her child, by causing her child to be distressed at times” (or similar). Wow! The child was desperate to be back with her, and expressed the trauma of separation.
(7) Emotional Incapacity: And then the clincher. As the child and mother have been torn apart and traumatized by the whole experience of separation, the social worker can, without substance, add that “the mother is now unable to meet the emotional needs of the child at this time…” Any behaviour can be used against her. If she fights for her child this can be seen as a negative. Anger, hysteria, teary — anything — can be conjured up as emotional incapacity. As she is not presently caring for the child, they claim that status quo (separation) should be maintained. It is truly outrageous.
(8) Mothering Instincts Become a Negative: There’s a further twist to discredit the mother, and that is often written up as the mother needs the child to meet her “emotional needs.” This again, is twisting the most dynamic and important function of the survival of homo sapiens, and motherhood. It is in our DNA for mothers to mother and protect. Now, departments across the country are using this as a claim that mothers must not have an “emotional” tie (dependence) to their children. Again there is no basis to make — or defend this claim.
Another similar claim is that the “mother—daughter relationship is unnaturally close.” Wow! With daughter (or son) having just gone through abuse, there would be a compensation for love, protection and closeness between the two. But this is used against the mother.
Other dirty tactics that surface.
(9) Discrediting: In some cases I’ve seen is the spreading of defamatory rumours – anything to make out that the mother is unworthy of support. This could be cleverly planted, and then spread further by knowing or unknowing people, e.g., the mother’s a sex worker, hooked on drugs, or anything “spreadable”. How easy is it to post a fake profile? (More on this in another article.)
There is another serious by-product in harming the mother. This can be deliberate, and can also be as a result of the accusations of emotional abuse. This is isolation.
(10) Isolation: I believe offenders and those enabling them use all sorts of tactics to isolate the mother. Family is a person’s most valuable support, and I have seen in some cases every attempt made to subtly and openly dissuade the family from supporting the mother – even encouraging her to unnecessary mental health assessments of comply to wrongful orders. Without family support, opportunities to abuse the mother’s predicament becomes too easy.
In some cases, I believe family members would prefer to live in denial rather than face the dark shadow of child abuse within family circles. As a result family members begin to subconsciously believe that there must be some validity behind the departments actions in removing the child — even if there is none. And slowly, by reverse osmosis, the support for the protective mother fades. What if fact is happening, is that the abused child is being denied justice and her rights to her parent/s.
It is always easier to be in denial. It is always easier to submit, that fight. But some mothers refuse to give up. (And this all applies to good fathers out there.)
I used to film wildlife in Africa, and I am reminded that some species will fight to the end to protect and nurture their offspring. I know of mothers with this tenacity and will. And that why they are in fact excellent mothers.
This an urgent request for donations this week-end to assist a protective parent’s legal battle. Gumshoe can assure readers that her case is critical in the road towards justice in Australia, and will help many other cases. PLEASE GO TO THE DONATE BUTTON (Gumshoe/Jammed Films Paypal account) or please try this link to DONATE.
Epstein’s Not The Only Predatory Sex Offender In The News: Here’s How Shockingly Prevalent This Has Become
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-07-26/epsteins-not-only-predatory-sex-offender-news-heres-how-shockingly-prevalent-has
Hardly anything happening in Australia compared to the US. Its entrenched here
I beg to differ Arlyn re: “Hardly anything happening in Australia compared to the US.”-same same only different. The colonised mind???
Paul Keatings Redfern Speech –“We committed the murders——————-“”
“We took the children away’
“We brought in the Tavistock Cadre
” We conducted experiments”
”https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redfern_Park_Speech
“We committed the murders. We took the children from their mothers. We practiced discrimination and exclusion. It was our ignorance and our prejudice.”
2007, ABC Radio National listeners voted the speech as their third most “unforgettable speech” behind Martin Luther King’s I Have a Dream speech (number one) and Jesus’ Sermon on the Mount (number two). [3]
Diane
Clarification I mean in charging with heavy penalties for those who are using others for sexual gratification with torture or underage
EMOTIONAL ABUSE AGAINST CHILDREN
https://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/4102.0main+features602014#CHILDREN
To quote abs.gov.au: “data is limited to only those who come into contact with children’s services agencies, and does not give a prevalence rate of abuse against children across the community.” “Emotionally abusive behaviours against children include verbal abuse, terrorising, isolating, ignoring and rejecting.”
How does a protection dept remove a child if the child is craving to be with that parent, and that parent loves, praises, supports, that child. How can that be emotional abuse? How often is this happening
Wow extremely triggering… yes all of the above my head is spinning.
https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/opinion/corrine-barraclough-not-everyones-supported-in-child-support-system/news-story/7c08e22b3d28029991758e8b7bc15e47
And where I am, I see the men that are abused by the system of child safety, I myself have been entrapped and there is no escape when in solo mode.
I am going to Quote the best I can of the X partner, after we had a visit by the child safety system when I, I repeat, after I,contacted child safety to inform them That I was in a relationship, I wanted to prove a point and I did.
Quote from the X. ” Alex, your a good man and you do deserve way better,but I just cant handle this crap you have with child safety, No one cares about you, no one is going to lose their job over you, I see you every day on the net and on the phone searching for your justice, I see you crumble on the floor with tears pouring, your a nobody and a nothing, you have no life or a future, she than packed up and took what she wanted and just walked out, a five year relationship,gone in a blink.
To date those words have come true, no one cares about me, no one will help me, I can not form another relationship,thus now I have no one that can say they have a care factor to me or even love.
So now I have to except crimes I never ever committed and I have to except I will be alone till the grave,I have to except I will not feel love again.
And because I too far away, no one from down south gives a flying frk., hence my attitude.
But one day, maybe soon, I will have to go though a door I dont want to,than I get the media hunting me for a story, be too late than.
What to say:
Emotional abuse can cover a wide range of behaviours or actions aimed at intimidating, controlling, isolating or manipulating a person.”
The Tavistock Agenda’s scientifically researched, “government/military” key weapon of mass destruction was to primarily control and break/destroy the individuals mind, destroy the family unit and separate groups from their origins, their homes, their beliefs and their culturally safe places, where they feel and experience love and a sense of belonging. The first essential step- break the mother’s maternal bond with the child using physical, sexual, emotional, spiritual, psychological strategies to “abandon” the child by depriving them of warmth, love and a sense of worthiness a sense of self.”
Dr Rawlings Rees/ Churchills Psychological Warfare Department. The next war will be a Battle of the Mind manipulating the minds of the masses.”
And then we have the Hidden Hand at work–the elite agenda- depopulation FEMA camps underground facilities -AI -being controlled by created beings/machines electro magnetic field frequencies
Dee “some species will fight to the end to protect and nurture their offspring. I know of mothers with this tenacity and will.”
So we just keep going. Restorative practice. Exposing the Truth about this place now called Australia.
Yes, the mental and the emotional attacks have done its damage, But I am still Sane, they destroyed and murdered human normal love between two normal stable humans, the mothers to my children, was giving a choice,(orders/demanded) get rid of him (me) and you keep the kids, I have not laid one eye since birth of my kids, total alienation. the kids are now aged 15-14-13, well I should be saying, they are not my kids, I am not their dad,never was and now,I just dont care of them, I dont want any contact with them, they are now nothing to me and they know nothing of me, unless the mothers have said something,but these kids do not know my history of culture,their blood line, that in it self is Genocide.
What the child safety system has done to kill and destroy a innocent family,dont even compare to all the rejections and all the buck passing I had to endure from so called humans who just couldnt give a rats ass that human life is murdered.
When I first heard of gumshoe news and spoke to Dee by email, I had a little hope pop in, that has now disappeared, I see no hope,I have nothing, my house is dead and half empty and only the ghosts of memories that linger to haunt me every single day, so I struggle with in, one part of me wants to hurt those that did what they did, but, the good in me, wont let that happen, so I try to voice out these concerns and still no one gives a rats ass, all I get is, ” good luck with that ”
So I beg the Question, If gumshoe news is so aware of all this, to why then hasnt gumshoe news formed a class action or direct a human to a lawyer that isnt corrupted or scared to tackle child safety.
Why is this country controlled by pedos ?.
Doc, “a lawyer that isn’t corrupted or scared to tackle child safety.” — There are a few but they get their license pulled.
Dee is doing a lot of work behind the scenes, and plans to be living in her car pretty soon.
We hear you. There are plenty of us here at the ranch who respect you.
An item from Habakkuk may ring , even if you are not religious:
“You, Lord, have appointed them to execute judgment;
you, my Rock, have ordained them to punish.
Your eyes are too pure to look on evil;
you cannot tolerate wrongdoing.
Why then do you tolerate the treacherous?”
Mary
If a lawyer gets his license pulled from the corrupt BAR system for assisting or tackling child safety on what grounds is it pulled?
Mary: i start off with this…Every moment of the day,as I came awake from sleep and as I try to sleep, every moment, I beg the lord. for mercy,I beg for justice,I beg for someone to come into my life and guide me out of the darkness, I beg the lord to have love in my life to be someone to somebody, it feels as if my begging is going unheard…..
The church will turn me away, so I have no faith in any so called Christians.
I have a 3 bedroom half empty dead house, I can offer Dee a room 🙂
Yes, people like yourself and those that are on here, yes, you hear me, but those that I want and desire to hear me are deaf as and with cold hearts.
I have not found one lawyer with any ballz, unless I have 50.000 bucks,plus.
I was even told by my so called local community legal service to never ever go there again,as there is no lawyer there that can assist me with child safety…who the hell are they protecting ???.
The cops, gee!!! they too also protect that system of child safety, so I cant go there to make a compliant.
I have 3 choices, just give up and die, seek asylum from the persecution, or fight, I have been fighting this crap for near on 15 years,15 years ago, I should of built a bomb and blow a building up and I be out of prison by now and have a better life.
Instead I waited and waited and waited believing I am in a democracy country that has a fair justice system..what a illusion I been living…
The Lord also stated that there is a time to love and a time to hate a time to build and a time to pull down a time to give life and a time to kill and that even though these mutts bring an army against you He will be there.These mutts don’t touch mine.They don’t get close.
When you reach that sort of low ordinary prayer won’t do anything.
It might sound trite but the only way out is by:
1) Rebuking Satan in the name of Jesus Christ OUT LOUD
&
2) Listening to some other oppressed soul
Music also helps me, particularly bluegrass gospel
But that’s purely personal
This guy also has a few worthy tips:
key remark at 33:50:
“you just better get equipped and learn how to fight ‘cause if you don’t you’re going to be a casualty”
We are living in times, where words do break bones. Economically emotionally and spiritually.
For bankers and the legal crafts, manufactured lies are good for business. As long as truth is denied, justice will remain just ice.
Will be interesting to see, how many current members of parliament are freemasons?
If that percentile also applies to the courts, therein lies our inequity and inequality.
Disgusting… Karma for them all…!! HANDS OFF OUR KIDS !!!! selfish liars!!! They are going to be held accountable. They think they won’t be ….
56
Go to the freemason building in Adelaide and you will see Downer Downer Downer
Jesuit – masonic – jewish connection
https://aladinsmiraclelamp.wordpress.com/2018/01/12/the-jesuits-run-the-world-not-a-jew/
Seeing it all appears to be linked, I might as welll say that it looks like that the people behind Political Correctness are freemasons. At one time there were 400,000 freemasons in Australia, more than enough to make PC work. The reason I say PC, is because I think it is the iron fist in the velvet gloves of, you know, feminism, antiracism, antihomophobia, etc…
PC is the driving force behind the enforcement of these divisive movements (only touched upon in the above link)
You don’t fear feminists themselves. You don’t fear homosexuals themselves, you don’t fear the antiracists themselves, you fear the Political Correctness movement behind them.
It is time the PC mob had a very large spotlight put on them.
PS Justin
They are not Jews despite what they say and we know what they believe they are Cabalists and Luciferians. They are not Judaic Christians.
Revelation 3:9 King James Version (KJV)
9 Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee.
Justin
Yes it is all connected but there is also another important aspect is the Counter-Reformation by the Jesuits that has never stopped and is very active! It is to destroy Protestantism and everything it stands for. They will use legalese, legislation and edicts or decrees to stop people freely saying what needs to be said. We are already living under coercive laws, draconian laws unjust laws but it will get much worse as this is only the beginning of sorrows. The NWO order of Satan and his kingdom on Earth will also have a NWR (Religion) It is the Babylonian pagan sun-god religion of the Mithraism Latin Roman Catholic Church-State also know as the great Whore or Harlot in the Bible.
Many people are slow to see the many fronts and who is who for knowing who the enemy really is.
History of the Counter Reformation
https://amazingdiscoveries.org/history-of-the-counter-reformation
The Counter Reformation
https://amazingdiscoveries.org/S-deception_end-time_Babylon_Revelation_Reformation
The Jesuits and the Counter Reformation Part I / Rekindling the Reformation – Walter Veith
***https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qu12z95K_cw
The Twin Pillars of the Reformation / Rekindling the Reformation – Walter Veith
***https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_DrJ8_i7giU
Secret Societies
***https://amazingdiscoveries.org/S-deception-secret-societies-Jesuit-knights
The Secret Behind Secret Societies / Total Onslaught –
Yes and Australia has Diane DeVere.
Doc says:
“I was even told by my so called local community legal service to never ever go there again,as there is no lawyer there that can assist me with child safety…who the hell are they protecting ???.
The cops, gee!!! they too also protect that system of child safety, so I cant go there to make a compliant.”
Nevertheless go there (to Po) and make a complaint and report back to Gumsies.
Doc. it’s worth a laugh.
Im not laughing, im dying slowly, they might be laughing at my expense.
To go from 70 odd kilos to 40 kilos is a slow death.
And if I die due to all this corruption, Than I can point the finger to child safety as the murderers.
Once yo dead, yo no be pointin’ no finger at nobody, hear?
OK, Doc, since you were sweet enough to give Her Bossness a half-house, I’ll consider doing a class action, but not a real one.
Just an ornamental one. Anyone wanting to send me HIS/her story about the court’s abuse of the litigant, pls keep it under 1200 words (500 would be better) was ship it to my all-new gmail address:
MaxwellMaryLLB. at. gmail.com
In my opinion the abuse by a court is an issue unto itself, never mind its myriad consequences for a child or for a particular litigant.
I had never heard of “torture in the courtroom” until I saw this a few years ago on Bill Windsor’s video series “Lawless America.” But now I can say for sure it happens in Australian Family Courts and Childrens Courts.
In fact please go back and read Dee’s article above again, with an eye to how the mother-bashing is essential for the court’s goal which is to destroy the family in question.
Mary….Ive already pointed my finger and you did look as others did, and you found that the victims out weigh the lie.
One thing people need to understand, children are a commodity to the government.
Children comes first before the parent and right there is the conundrum, without parents there is no children to fight over, so no focus on the parent/s as support or assistance and its seems parents have no rights over their own children.
There should be not only a class action, but also a Investigation into the child safety system/family courts of the corruption that is in full swing with this system, and if one really looks,one can follow the bread crumbs to where that corruption leads to and yes it does lead to the Premiere of the State, there is so many people involved in the concealment’s to what this system does to innocent humans when any human is entrapped in that system of corruption.
What gets me, is that people in this country will stand up and protest to crap like that of Anti-Adani protesters, yet no one will gather to protest of the cruelty of abuse to parents and to children by this government.
Not only does this sinister systematic involvement of many if not all of the institutions and government agencies and the decrepit and criminal court system but the schools or the education system needs to be separated from the state.
Alliance for the Separation of School & State
http://www.schoolandstate.org/home.htm
We Don’t Need No (Public) Education: Sheldon Richman on the Separation of School and State
https://realityzone.com/product/audio-archives-volume-iv/ US
There are 3 audios here with G. Edward Griffin. The one that is “Why We Need Separation of School and State. I have a CD which describes the audio. “this is about how government is twisting the minds of our kids. The reason academic standards are low in government schools is that the goal is no long to educate but to indoctrinate; not to prepare children to think and reason, but to create docile workers in a global collectivist society. This former schoolteacher brings it all together, based on personal experience and historical documents. Once you understand the true agenda, everything about our schools begins to make sense
Most people are oblivious to the fact that the very Entity that prohibits so-called paedophilia derives most of it’s power from another form of abuse which is principally the same.
Some babies can walk as early as 9 months; that doesn’t mean they’re old enough to cross the road by themselves. Most children are only just starting to get the basics of literacy when they’re thrown into State-controlled learning, but even if they can read well they do not have the faculties to maintain their autonomy in a classroom situation.
What interests me is that, prior to the advent of the printing press, the 3 Rs were jealously guarded by the World’s religious elite. When that was no longer possible the same type of control was rolled out under a different guise. That system is wholly dependent on making the subjects oblivious to the fact that NOTHING can be inculcated in a spiritual vacuum.
That was the week that was!
by Tim Veater.
http://veaterecosan.blogspot.com/2019/07/that-was-week-that-was-by-tim-veater.html
Doc, Im so very sorry this has been done to you, its abhorrent! I feel it would help reach out in some way if you started a fb video journal or you tube videos talking about what has occued and aho have done these things to you and your family.
This is horrible and needs to be seen by as many as possible.
Im so very sorry.
What they did came right out of a movie to real life to form a maze of misery.
I feel Im the only one :(, I have not found another,the exact same as myself, yes, some come close, some have it worse. But now have I found that I can fully relate to or them to me.
I can honestly state, I have no clue, zero iota to any of the kids or the mother’s of them, all I know is their age and a few faded memories of the short time I did have, twenty mins after birth was the shortest.
I kind of do have a youtube outlet: https://www.youtube.com/user/Cursed4Red/videos you get to see ugly me…………
Yes, I want people to know, best way is in a court of law, but that and any media outlets wont touch me, I get introduced to the Merry-Go-Round of Buck Passing, or sorry to hear that, good luck…..
I got a folder in my email, named: Rejections: ya know to full that folder is ???.. its the evidence of all the places I went a begging, and boy!!! there is heaps of Rejections.
I keep thinking, If Only, if only this was dealt with right from the beginning to 100%
Then, I wouldnt be here, I be more healthier, I have family, have friends, be someone to somebody, have meaning and I would not know of all the things I have learnt, of the corruption, of the cold hearted humans, of the many other victims, I have gain so much insight, but for what? all this abuse and I can not expose it………..
FROM STORY”I used to film wildlife in Africa, and I am reminded that some species will fight to the end to protect and nurture their offspring. I know of mothers with this tenacity and will. And that why they are in fact excellent mothers.”
This is the trouble.There is not one single one of them that are like this.Until mothers and fathers are prepared to kill and die to protect their young nothing will change.
Berry
A great video of Casting Down Srongholds. Thank you
[…] substantiation by protection agencies in 2016). The father, to deflect suspicion on himself, accused the mother of being delusional, but the police interview with his daughter has now come to […]
[…] substantiation by protection agencies in 2016). The father, to deflect suspicion on himself, accused the mother of being delusional, but the police interview with his daughter has now come to […]