Home Fam-Court The Pedophile Racket, Part 3: The “Beautiful Trick”

The Pedophile Racket, Part 3: The “Beautiful Trick”

40

by Dee McLachlan

It is written that when Jesus was nailed to the cross he called out to God, “Why have You forsaken Me?” After learning about the torture of a particular child in South Australia, I wondered if she thought “Why is everyone forsaking me?” Indeed, society has forsaken her. Australia, it seems, has bought in to a system that has been carefully designed to do the worst for any children who have been abused within the family.

I have seen now firsthand how an elaborate system of the court, police, and Department for Child Protection (known as the DCP in South Australia) work in concert, and are able to make family life become a living hell.

And thereafter, if a protective parent seeks help for her (or his) child caught up in guardianship, no person in authority dares to intervene against this system. No one.

I found that leaders uniformly abdicate their responsibility to protect children. Maybe they become indoctrinated in the deflection of liability — but each leader, commissioner, minister and even the prime minister dutifully responds with “it is not under my jurisdiction” or “portfolio”, and the problem is passed on.

In 2018, partly in conjunction with my running a Family Court survey at GumshoeNews, I became involved in the saga of a family in South Australia. I initially thought the government must have had a misunderstanding or a miscommunication as to the facts. But by early 2019 I began to see that everything was deliberate, and I learned how the courts became part of a “beautiful trick” (to cover evidence of sexual abuse) — and how this can result in one losing one’s child to the State.

The departments charged with protecting children are all powerful, and because society has now become paranoid about “safety” and “protection,” this mindset has provided authorities with an unquestioned immunity to act as they so wish. And act they do.

Investigations, hearings, and court cases are also often dragged out to “burn off” the protective parent, and as US protective parent Don Rufty wrote (in a fictitious judge’s announcement) “Your child will be kept away from you for a long time and that is good because it gets you used to being without your child….”

And so, Round 1 in this saga is how the courts are used as an excuse to drop or repress any investigation of the crimes involved in the child abuse. It is truly a beautiful trick.

Deceptive Use of the Courts

If serious accusations against a pedophile parent arise, the offender often applies — usually within three weeks — for custody in the Family Court (Federal). As part of that application, the offender can put in a “Notice of Risk”, falsely identifying the protective parent as the danger. The protective parent usually does not realize the battle is already half lost, before they begin.

The first deception comes into play when the matter is before the Family Court. The police and other agencies put their hands up and declare that that they are unable to investigate the sexual abuse as the matter is “before the court.” The investigation grinds to a halt, and the court is then not fully informed of any abuses. (Are you with me?)

In fact, in the SA case to which I refer, the DCP did not investigate numerous historic notifications (for nearly a year) leading up to the trial in the Family Court, and SAPOL did not report what the child had revealed at an interview with a policewoman. (In fact that officer deliberately repressed those disclosures.) The excuse: they were waiting for the court to decide.

Yes, we have both sides, police and courts, claiming to be “left out” of the procedure – in a way that paralyzes the whole works. It took me some time to grasp the reality of what was happening. Surely it can’t be!

Since the Family Court judge I am describing was not informed of those major disclosures, he made the assumption that the abuse probably never happened.

It is quite extraordinary really. The DCP social workers and a SAPOL officer were all privy to the most egregious abuse disclosures by this child — but they never informed the court. And considering that abuse had already been substantiated two years prior, the DCP and SAPOL should have been all over it. But they just let it ride.

Then these same social workers later claim the judge has ruled — and this to justify their position that abuse most likely never happened!!! A very cruel twist to discredit a child and the abuse suffered.

Moreover, when they say “if abuse never happened,” this points to the mental clarity of the protective mother — declaring her delusional and a “coacher.” She ends up the “dangerous” one.

Clearly all these people abandoned the child.

In many cases in the GumshoeNews survey it was game over for those protective parents. However, in this SA case, the mother put up a good fight, and even though the Family Court judge was highly critical of her, he awarded her sole parental responsibility in 2017. The father got visitation rights.

A Twisted Logic 

The Adelaide mother had survived Round 1 — even though it cost her about $200,000. But little did she know she had been set up to fail Round 2.

After the second visitation with Dad (in 2018), the young lass returned with a significant wound. After a few days and making three different excuses, she finally broke down and said her father had cut her deliberately, and threatened her that he’d kill her mother if she spoke out.

The mother reported this assault.

Considering that abuse had previously been substantiated in 2016, the DCP and SAPOL (SA police) should have acted immediately. But records now show that the DCP, CPS (Child Protective Services) and SAPOL halted their investigation. The DCP’s excuse: “it’s a matter for Family Court.” (Please note: that’s not true. It is not a judge’s job to investigate a criminal complaint.)

For nearly a month the agencies dallied — waiting for the wound to mostly heal. In fact the officer says on the phone, “ The issue we have now is that the bruises aren’t there…” (they were cuts).

And then the DCP swooped in with a court order. Having deliberate halted an investigation, the DCP then persuaded a Youth Court judge that they needed to “do an investigation” — and to do so they must remove the child from the mother’s care. You see, after the reporting of the assault, a number of people (which must have included a police person) called in, or wrote in with fake accusations of the mother suffering psychosis and delusions. But fortunately, recordings reveal the criminal deception unfolding.

The child’s greatest fear was to be taken from her mother, and so now the psychological abuse of the child begins.

I have listened to the child’s account, and I one hundred percent believe her. So I wondered, why would her father deliberately inflict such an injury right after the court awarded him visitation? (Because of previous abuse substantiation he had had only supervised visit until now.) It is my serious guess that the infliction of a wound was done in order to pull the DCP into the equation. Round 1 had failed, but Round 2 would involve the DCP and a new court — the State’s Youth Court.

As you will see, the wound, followed by the supposed “investigation” became the basis for mum-child separation (which the court has now ruled will be permanent).

This “beautiful trick” of allows for the so-called investigation to be no longer on the assault — it gets focused on the mother.

Possession is Nine-tenths… 

Once the child is in under “government management,” reports can, of course, be manipulated to relay any message desired. Allocated psychologists can prescribe the government’s desired outcome. Anything is possible. A tearful child desperate to see her mum, can be reported as “the child becomes distressed on seeing the mother,” or a loving mother (who gives a hug) can be written up as “over emotional.”

You know the old saying “Possession is nine-tenths of the law.” From the cases I’ve read, it is almost impossible for a protective parent to get a kid back once it is in possession of the state’s bureaucracy. You are competing with the resources of a billion-dollar department.

And now in Youth or Children’s Court hearsay overrides evidence. (Frankly, I consider this abuse of the protective parent and the child. You would be shocked if you heard what is said – pure slander, in the atmosphere of a “court.”)

In this SA case at least 10 affidavits declaring the mother a great mum are ignored. These are replaced with hundreds of pages of reports and access notes — written, it seems, specifically to discredit the mother. The twisting of facts and extreme bias is so blatantly obvious, that the accusations ferment on the page.

Suppression of Evidence 

But what if powerful evidence does surface?

In the SA case, the mother finally got to watch a 74-minute police interview in which her daughter disclosed the horrors of her abuse. But once again “court” is used as an excuse.

The mother confronted the DCP, pleading for them to investigate what the kid had said during the interview (and of which she, the Mum, had previously been ignorant). Their first excuse was that they could not get involved in a police investigation. When it was pointed out that is when they should get involved, the second excuse emerged — that “the matter is before Youth Court.”

Investigations into child abuse STOP because the matter is before the Courts. But then the Court (Youth Court) is used to remove her child TO investigate. The same Court is later used as an excuse NOT to investigate so that they can keep her child from her. It is a masterful manipulation of the law — a deceptive beautiful trick that is used against many children in Australia.

Every few weeks I bump into the same coffee-drinker at my local coffee shop and we exchange news. I have been informing her through the year of this Adelaide case. This week I had to tell her that the Youth Court trial is finished and it appears the mum lost her child. My friend at the coffee shop actually wept when I told her.

To assist this protective parent’s battle to survive this challenge. I can assure readers that her case is critical in the road towards justice in Australia, and will help many other cases. You can also use this link here to to DONATE. (Jammed Films Paypal account).

SHARE

40 COMMENTS

  1. Dee, I just tried to donate but the Paypal log-in page is rawther complicated for my age group. Any other way to do it?

    By the way, I’ll bet you don’t realize how important your article is. I must find out if US plays the same beautiful trick.

    I often get irritated when newspapers mention that someone other than a judge says “Can’t talk about it as it is sub judice.” Nonsense. When it is sub judice is the best time to talk so the judge can take judicial notice of social opinion.

    • Mary, I am a technophobe although (or perhaps, because) I worked with computers for many years. It took me ten years to start using a microwave oven. I sometimes get lost because I refuse to read the manual for the GPS in my car. At might, I sometimes take a wrong turn driving down streets I am used to. But somehow I am connected to PayPal and it works ok. Believe me, it’s easy to use if i can use it. .
      Kind regards, Richard

  2. All three of those ‘corporate entities’ are not government they are corporations is the first trick or sleight of hand. Sue the corporations and the government for their sedition in their complicity in the aiding and abetting of this criminal activity. In addition we have the illegal Australia Act so we have a defacto government. Surely there is criminal and civil proceedings tlo be done.

    Corporations Masquerading as Government in Australia & World Wide
    https://wakeup-world.com/2012/11/09/are-corporations-masquerading-as-government-in-australia-and-world-wide/

    http://corpau.blogspot.com/2015/01/corporations-masquerading-as-government.html

    https://peoplestrustaustralia.blogspot.com/2013/02/corporations-masquerading-as-government.html

    https://realnewsaustralia.com/2016/04/24/1973-the-birth-of-corporate-australia/

    https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&channel=trow&q=Corporations+masquading+as+government

    https://dinarvets.com/forums/index.php?/topic/50483-the-evil-corporation-masquerading-as-our-government/

  3. A ‘beautiful trick’ which is cruel in the extreme. Don’t these abusers realise that their ‘quarry’ will grow up and revile them? Then prosecute them? That’s if the victim hasn’t been compromised in some way to keep them quiet of course. But not everyone who has been compromised stays quiet. Some scream loudly about their abuse. I know of a trio of siblings who signed a statutory declaration stating that, as children, they were complicit in child murders perpetrated by their father. That statutory declaration was handed to major crime over 10 years ago. No interviews were conducted by SAPOL. Perhaps those SAPOL officers in Major crime are also complicit in crimes, but as adults. Divide and conquer. Isolate and compromise. The ‘game’ continues….

  4. This man had the corrupt ex PM Tony Blair removed from office.

    Report #124: Equity Lawyer Edward William Ellis: The Corruption Remedy Process

  5. Nice spanner into to works(I call the grinder) Dee.
    A child could understand what you point out here if it were not child abuse to show them.
    Thing is, the magistrates and clerks(especially the cobweb type) etc must know too yet..

  6. I have just received a call from Ned. (and asked me to comment on his behalf, as he us unable to for the moment)

    He made a point what an important turning point this article is. He had two things that affected him today. This article — which displays so clearly how society and their leaders abandon a child. And to compare this with another piece that ran on 2GB.

    This was a story about young school students, encouraging and helping each other:
    “Students at a private school on Sydney’s Lower North Shore have made an incredible gesture to their classmate who lives with a disability. Callum was born with Global Developmental Delay which has affected his speech and ability to learn. His mother contacted Ray Hadley, touched by a great show of support her son received. During a race with students from St Joseph’s College in Hunters Hill, Callum’s peers joined him near the end of the 1500 metres to cross the finish line with him.
    Watch the video here https://www.2gb.com/warms-the-heart-private-schools-incredible-gesture-for-classmate-with-a-disability/

    Ned said the time is now to end this judicial and governmental catastrophe. With Epstein unraveling, is it not clear what is happening. Pell has been confined to solitary, and Ned suggested that maybe some of these persons involved should have the same treatment.

  7. Dee,
    Thanks for the comment but you are being humble.
    What I also expressed to you and want is for every gumshoe reader to send Dee’s articles on this particular depravity and bureaucratic evil exposed over the last few months or so in articles at gumshoe, to the Walkley Wankers who massage their egos with mainstream articles of distractions that are ignoring (and protecting) this most serious and evil aspect of our society.
    What more can I say?

    Here is a link to the vacuous wankers.

    https://www.walkleys.com/

    WE now know from the Epstein exposures (plus Saville et. al,) and references to his reported clientele that we are surrounded by evil child abusers who ingratiate themselves at all levels of society, government and amidst institutions and are protected at such levels by the msms.

    It would appear that the msm’s failures in the past have protected and abetted such evil.

    Why is it that the millions spent on the Royal Commission has failed to expose the top echelons of power, influence and society and did not do it’s job? It was a BS distraction looking for low hanging fruit!!!! (excepting a Cardinal………..good one; but we are not distracted from the rest!)

    I have a favour to ask: Please send all the historic articles
    on this matter to the Walkley ego club and recommend that Dee and Gumshoe be recommended for a Genuine Walkley award.

    Yes, they will not have the guts to acknowledge and give credit to Dee and all her work on this matter and have any cognisance with the many comments based on real experiences. But at least they, as a collective might appreciate that out here is a silent majority that can recognise a gaggle of wankers and they can all disappear into irrelevancy without loss.

    AND so the msm should, go away you are FAKE…………See the video posted from 2GB by DEE.

    Seven year old’s possess more humanity and empathy than the whole of you overpaid hypocrites of the MSM.

  8. An ex-con named Shaun Atwood runs a very entertaining website. This is one of his videos. I am not sure he is being accurate. Says the rule is KOS –“kill on sight” if a pedophile is spotted in the prison population.

    I consider this practice terrible. The law assigns a certain penalty for each crime — a fine or a prison sentence. Nothing should be added to that by thugs. On the other hand, if all pedos are protected such that no pedo gets arrested, then the law of outlawry should apply.

    • Mary
      In the community we all are appalled at the lack or length of time that they spend in jail/prison for their evil sexual deeds…particularly if they are re-offending. There needs to be harsher penalties for rape and even harsher for pedophiles. Chemical castration is too good for them after the first offence! Community expectations also need to be taken into consideration.

  10. It will be interesting to hear what the judge has to say one way or the other. Pell is hated and the body guards of the police says something to the community.

  11. My understanding is that the overarching principle is mutually binding
    Which means that no court can intervene in any matter taken up with a Ministerial proxy(government department) unless it’s been officially determined by said proxy

  12. Has the Administrative Appeals Tribunal ever been used or can it be used?

    The Administrative Appeals Tribunal
    https://www.aat.gov.au/about-the-aat

    Functions and powers
    Jurisdiction

    We can only review a decision if a law states that the decision can be reviewed by the AAT.

    We can review decisions made under more than 400 Commonwealth Acts and legislative instruments. The most common types of decisions we review relate to:

    child support
    Commonwealth workers’ compensation
    family assistance, paid parental leave, social security and student assistance
    migration and refugee visas and visa-related decisions
    taxation
    veterans' entitlements.

    We also review decisions relating to:

    Australian citizenship
    bankruptcy
    civil aviation
    corporations and financial services regulation
    customs
    freedom of information
    the National Disability Insurance Scheme
    passports
    security assessments by the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation.

  13. The socialist state thinks that children belong to them. They think parents should hand their children over to society. This is not God’s plan for families. With God on my side and trusting him, I think I would have run away with my child, and kept the child away from the abusing parent. I would fight the courts too. How can a court solve a personal problem one is facing? I know too that the criminal justice system is very contrary and prejudiced and can be perverted.
    Still, despite these things, God is greater than evil powers. I pray that God will hear my prayers for this mum and child to be re-united, and delivered and protected from evil. Please, others pray too. Luke 18:1 says: that men ought always to pray, and not to faint; Sometimes it really takes persevering faith to believe that God will overcome all the obstacles arraigned against yourself, because the foe has taken such ground against yourself. But do not fear the evil foe. Be courageous, pray, and go into that battle field and God will be with you and help you. Even when society is influenced and co-operating with such horrendous evil, we still must not give up believing what God can do and what God can help us to do.

  14. Ned, you are awesome. Your comments are always brilliant. However, a Wankey award would only diminish Dee’s wondrousness! We don’t want her lumped in with the likes of Nigel Hunt now do we? I will nominate her though, just for the hell of it. She has far too much integrity to win such an award, but hey, maybe times are changing?

    • Thankyou Rachel, i am not brilliant I am just a simpleton who hopefully still has a keen sense of smell. ( i am a perfume addict with many beautiful memories from those days! I can pick most still.)
      These days, less perfume and overcome with the realities of the smell of BS.
      Oh, to be 19 again!

  15. If you nominate for a Walkley it costs $150 UNLESS you nominate under the ‘Outstanding Contribution’ category. This will come up on the payment page as you complete the entry. It automatically comes up as $150 cost UNTIL you tick the Outstanding Contribution button on the right. Then the nomination will come up as costing $0.

    • Wow, thanks, Rachel. As noted, Gumshoe has sent a few unavailing $150’s to Walkley. Pray tell, does it hold for the so-called long-form journalism, i.e., a whole book?

      Speaking of rewards, is there a way I could nominate you or Bro Andrew McIntyre for the advertised REWARD for info about the Beaumont children?

  16. I’m devastated. One has to wonder how they could have held a trial without calling all of the witnesses? They just do whatever they like & hold NO accountability for their actions! What sort of country are we living in? Deliberate destruction of the family unit is what it’s all about. David Icke got it right.

  23. I do not recall the Adelaide “Advertiser”,which currently belongs to Murdoch, having excelled itself these last 40 years or so on the topic of investigative reporting on SA pedophiles.

    Talking up real estate prices, concealing anything and everything of substance to do with the US/Aust. military complex in Adelaide and SA (while saying how many jobs it creates) and running preachy and diversionary transsexual-female-Indigenous-Muslim Regressive Left identity politics are more its bailiwick.

    So I had a bit of a grin when I saw my inbox just now on 3 Sept. More smoke and mirrors, the three-card trick to fool the punters? So PM ScoMo,as member of the Hillsong pentacostalist church with the pedo background of its founder (source: Shane Dowling), is “going to war”, is he? Maybe Mary LLB can look at the Bill?

    ADVERTISER TODAY:
    , “+ Subscriber Only: New laws as PM goes to war with paedophiles

    Life sentences, mandatory prison terms and a ban on bail form the core of tough new anti-paedophile legislation that will be introduced in Federal Parliament next week.”

  24. Sco mos been busy making himself look like an anti paedophile crusader since Facebooker Adrian John Wells alleged Sco Mo sexually abused him as a child (1980’s) and was charged by police for paedophilia. I saw Adrian’s allegations on FB last Sunday. The next day Sco Mo denounced a security guard charged with showing his penis to a little girl (the security guard is to be deported.) Now Sco Mo announces these new child sex laws. It’s all a bit too timely IMO. There must be evidence somewhere that Sco Mo has this charge for paedophilia. Adrian alleges his paperwork regarding these allegations were stolen by a female cop. facebook.com/adrian.j.wells.54922169

  26. I havnt bothered to visit these types of sites as to whatever groups are on facebook, I kinda see theses as a waste of time,nothing in 15 yrs has changed,only more victims, only words,words and more words of pain and suffering and those that are lucky to be on any form of news,even gumshoe,got their issues viewed and talked about around a coffee table, as to this story.
    Living hell you say ???. I doubt it, they still had friends, still had contact to the children, maybe still had a partner, still obtain all the support from so called caring people.
    What about a human that has No Friends, No Family, No support what so ever,lives alone, in pain and in suffering, no one real to talk to,more so at night,when the darkness sets in and the misery intensifies.
    No matter where I go, to beg, to grovel, “Why have you all forsaken me”, why do you all allow them to abuse me ???, why are they still continuing to abuse ???
    There is truly no place I can go to, Ive been everywhere man!!!!
    They made me a product of corruption and produced the outcomes of their abuse, Bullies.

C'mon Leave a Reply, Debate and Add to the Discussion

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.