[Editors Note: We know from the evidence that Martin Bryant was not the shooter, and that the people of Australia have been hypnotized by the mainstream media lies.
Phil asked, in a comment, whether G5 could expand on the Port Arthur massacre. I sent this request to G5, and this below is his simple reply.]
“There were two intel shooters who blended in with the rest after the event… It was a false flag gun grab which unfortunately worked for Howard.” G5.
Well, that comment doesn’t assist any understanding of PA. He/she might as well have said “There were two space aliens who blended in with the rest after the event.”
How about some objective facts to support the assertion, pictures, physical evidence? How about something less cryptic, you know, some specifics. Where were they? Who did they blend in with? After which event?
The comment is less than helpful.
The same old ground on the Port Arthur massacre and the rest of a peculiar list of incidents such as Lindt Cafe and so on, if this is state operarations we would infere this is all part of Asio or some department of covert operations in Australia and or organized crime that may well be all part of a political association including MI5/6 and the CIA and numerous security agencies that are all part of a political operationthat is proactive, if any one is new to this site attempting to understand this peculiar state of affairs a fair question to put is why would the so call securitybe killing and setting up individuals? here we need to look at conspiracy possibilities which admittedly leaves one into the plethora of crackpot theories such as the Flat Earth flat conspiracy and so on, as luck has it this makes comments such as mine within the realm of dubious or subjective ideology, here the theory is the ruling class requires a state of fear within the psyche of the masses, that is socialism, we need war violence and incidents such as Lindt Cafe, to instill a level of fear that violence can occur any where at any time, considering world wide now Australia is now determining to become a major arms and military supplier of weapons and allied material, this requires buyers we need sales what ever noble intention such as friendly nations and such propaganda,we need to kill people to make sales for employment and profit.
The entrenchment of being historically a military culture is now sonormal that killing and maiming are normal as a everyday event that on popular TV shows you may well be asked what you do and a recent reply was I make bomb casings, this becomes a normal job much the same as a job such as a cleaner, their you have it killing is good for us all except the victims and the dead no longer speak nor vote but in Australia as banking shows the dead can still pay taxes.
Don, you said:
“here the theory is the ruling class requires a state of fear within the psyche of the masses, that is socialism, we need war violence and incidents such as Lindt Cafe, to instill a level of fear that violence can occur any where at any time”
i agree except with the term “socialism.” That word has a standard definition unlike the way you are using it, so why mess up your theory.
As for people taking violence nonchalantly, you should find out what the Youngies are doing when they play games on their “devices.” Several kills before brekkie is practically de rigueur. OK so I don’t know how to spell de rigueur, so sue me.
It doesn’t appear that Dyson was the actual shooter. However, there is evidence that he was involved in both PA and the NZ massacre.
It is part of the ‘disinformation’ aspect of psy-ops for the MSM to cloud the issues. To ‘spin’ the argument that Dyson was the shooter is more likely a part of disinformation that the MSM will willingly participate in.
I wouldn’t doubt that the whole ‘Dyson was the shooter’ is a diversion. – He can say with a straight face that he wasn’t the shooter and be correct – and the ‘conspiracy theorists’ are caught in their web of deceit even if they don’t agree with it.
The MSM is not reliable. To give any credence to the MSM is only something a fool would do.
Mythoughtsalso-disinformation.
Poisonedwell!
NOWWHY??
foodforidiots
Mr Dyson, if innocent could of Sued, the writer/s. if incorrect
That clearly not the case.
Also, what right does an individual have who is supposedly “defamed” to write to the prime minister to get facebook topto a post down.
I cas told I would be murdered 1 year ago, went to cops, they told me, nithing could be done, as facebook fs an international site.
Really, so, prooves one thing.
Two sets of rules apply in the system, one for cops, and one for victims, with no where to turn for help and safety, me.
Toughen up, your an ex officer, so, deal with the “harmless people if your think they are HARMING you yourself, just like we do.
Happy to look at the court action yiu took mr dyson, and i will get our states cops uonyo date, with, facebook degredation and threats. Mr Dyson, you actually called me mentally ill, on facebook, for the record, only a brave or stupid person, would do that- i i c supply you a copy of Dr Ian Sales Psych report if you like.
Martin Bryant needed a “trial” howver, William hodgman, knows, judges and laeyers werent seorn in in tasmania
…- so, he needs to be set free!!!…
… Its a frameup…
… Wrongfully incaserated, For sure,
… Free ARE a or 2 Murderers…
So Dyson….If it’s defamation why don’t you sue? You know who is posting those comments as you’ve had a lot of interaction with that person in one particular group & have threatened legal action. In fact I have copies of your responses in my files.
Dyson will not take any action as he knows what else will come out in discovery…..
Btw….Who is G5?
What we are dealing with is the irksome problem that the government, judiciary and media are corrupt agencies of a variety of foreign interests and ideologies that are hostile to the commonwealth of the Nation’s people. Such foreign interests have all the ideologues, stooges, lackeys and useful idiots they need to distract, deflect, mislead and/or stymie any doubts about the “official version” by dismissing the doubters as crackpot conspiracy theorists. It is child’s play to con a few clever misfits to knock up any amount of false flags and fly them for a bit of pocket money or even just a pat on the ego.
To expose the corrupt secretocracy you need a good case with the evidence to make it stick.
Brendon O’Connell has a live case and he has meticulously (one could say, obsessively) kept records of the proceedings and criminal “irregularities”. He is a rather volatile character and often gets carried away with his pet projects but beside that he has amassed irrefutable evidence of systemic corruption.
Drop him a note at meeting@boc.rocks for more than you bargained for.
And to have this evidence is to have a target on your back and guess who would be next? Power and control is the name of the game, whether it is in our country or mine.
In a website run by Brendon O’Conell in Perth, I found what was almost a by line in which the surviver from Western Australia said his girlfriend Kate lent over the table and said to him “there are TWO blokes staring at me.”
As he lent over the table to see the blokes standing in the doorway, he was injured and Kate died.
I’ve never heard that one, Kevin.
What about you contact Brendon at the address above and ask him for a “please explain”?
I visited his website and its mostly shut down. He’s only got some in his words ‘special stuff up.” Seems like he has withdrawn for a while. I could not find the article.
It was on this site a year or so ago. Spose I should have taken a snip of it.
I sent the website link containing the item to this website at the time.