Home News What Does Mind Control Do to the US Constitution?

What Does Mind Control Do to the US Constitution?

38
Protesting citizens outside NJ statehouse in Trenton on December 16, 2019.   Photo: Mike Catalini, AP

by Mary W Maxwell, LLB

I have always believed the United States constitution to be perfect. Granted, it was composed by mortal men. Granted, many of its clauses got in by only a narrow vote during the 1787 convention in Philadelphia. But it did take into account all that was knowable at the time in terms of human nature and of the capacity of powers to coalesce and cause problems.

For example, Alexander Hamilton, urging his state to ratify the Constitution, wrote, on December 4, 1787, that a nation (a Confederacy of states) was needed for survival:

To the People of the State of New York,

“… If there should not be a large army constantly at the disposal of the national government it would either not be able to employ force at all, or, when this could be done, it would amount to a war between parts of the Confederacy …. It would rarely happen that the delinquency to be redressed [i.e., a state refusing to follow the rules] would be confined to a single member, and if there were more than one who had neglected their duty, similarity of situation would induce them to unite for common defense.

“Independent of this motive of sympathy, if a large and influential State should happen to be the aggressing member, it would commonly have weight enough with its neighbors to win over some of them as associates to its cause. Specious arguments of danger to the common liberty could easily be contrived; plausible excuses … could be… invented to alarm the apprehensions, inflame the passions,….

“This would be the more likely to take place, as the delinquencies of the larger members might be expected sometimes to proceed from an ambitious premeditation in their rulers, with a view to getting rid of all external control upon their designs of personal aggrandizement; the better to effect which it is presumable they would tamper beforehand with leading individuals in the adjacent States.

“If associates could not be found at home, recourse would be had to the aid of foreign powers, who would seldom be disinclined to encouraging the dissensions of a Confederacy, from the firm union of which they had so much to fear. When the sword is once drawn, the passions of men observe no bounds of moderation. … The first war of this kind would probably terminate in a dissolution of the Union.

That comes from Number 16 of the Federalist Papers, of which there are 85, mostly written by Hamilton, age 35, and James Madison, age 36. The Constitution got ratified in 1789 and has served the nation well. Extremely well, in my opinion.

The Framers of the Constitution were suspicious of persons and were acquainted with the human vices. But what if there were a vice that they did not know about? What if that vice became prevalent and put the nation in jeopardy?  Could the Constitution continue to function and protect us?

Mass Mind Control

I am here to talk about mind control. It is unlikely that the Framers knew about the power of high-tech mind control.  They knew about propaganda — in fact the Federalist Papers, widely distributed, were intended to be persuasive and thus were propaganda. The Framers probably did not know the techniques of hypnosis, but would have been aware of human suggestibility.

What if we had asked them this question:  “If, 232 years hence (that is, in 2019), some hidden manipulators set out to tell people untruths, and the people could not apply their critical reasoning, would those manipulators be able to encroach on the people’s liberties?”

Of course, the Framers would say Yes.  If we then asked them “If the people could not know the facts, would their representatives in Congress be able to represent them?” I suppose they’d have to say No.  Much of the ratification debates had to do with how representation would work.

For example, Melancton Smith, at the New York Ratifying Convention in June 1788, argued along these lines:

“… it is proper to examine the qualifications which this house ought to possess, in order to exercise their powers discreetly for the happiness of the people. The idea that naturally suggests itself to our minds, when we speak of representatives is, that they resemble those they represent; they should be a true picture of the people; possess the knowledge of their circumstances and their wants; sympathize in all their distresses, and be disposed to seek their true interests.

“The knowledge necessary for the representatives of a free people, not only comprehends extensive political and commercial information, such as is acquired by men of refined education, … but it should also comprehend that kind of acquaintance with the common concerns and occupations of the people, which men of the middling class of life are in general much better competent to, than those of a superior class.”

I suggest it would be impossible for the people to even convey what they want, to their representatives, if they are operating under wrong information.

The Example of Vaccination

On Monday, December 16, 2019, New Jersey’s lower house, the Assembly, passed a bill that would end religious exemptions for vaccines for schoolchildren and kids at childcare centers. The vote was 45-25. Other states such as New York and California have already enacted such legislation.   In the Senate in Trenton, protestors disrupted the session so that a vote could not be taken. They shouted “We do not consent” and “In God we trust.”

In my opinion, folks in the United States are misinformed about vaccination.  I do not ask that you now agree with that opinion, but for purposes of this exercise, I ask that you go along with me for argument’s sake.  Pretend it has been proven that an interest group, be it profit-making Big Pharma, or be it some genocidal maniacs, have propagandized people that vaccinations are good when they know very well they are harmful.

How would this affect the elected representatives who are asked to pass a bill taking away the parent’s right to choose?

At the moment the issue is slightly skewed by the fact that of all the possible exemptions (religious, philosophical or medical), the one under consideration is the religious exemption. That means there may be a court challenge in regard to the First Amendment’s guarantee of religious freedom. “God does not want me to have my child vaccinated.”

But imagine instead that only a general freedom to choose is at issue. Any citizen, wanting to know how she should instruct her member of the legislature to vote, needs to know what her interests are.  If she knew that the motives of vaccination are bad she will instruct “Don’t pass that law.”

Now, for argument’s sake, imagine that some group has not merely put out a lot of propaganda to say “Vax is great,” but has in a separate move, used neuroscientific tricks to disable, in some way, the part of the brain that can think rationally.

In regard to the vaccination issue, the person would be unable to judge the difference between advertising and proper science. And this would apply to persons even of high education who, before the mind control, could make excellent criticism.

I think you see where I am headed.  With mind control flourishing, I believe the Constitution could not function in regard to one of its main tasks, which is to allocate power.   The delegates to the Constitutional Convention of 1787, consisting of 55 men from the 13 states, were very careful to place power in interested hands where it would not likely be abused — or if abused would be corrected by another “interest.”

The legislature’s power to abuse is naturally great, but the judiciary can apply the Constitution, especially the Bill of Rights,  to check that power. And the voters can “terminate” a bad legislator at the next two-yearly election.

But no one can crack down on the manipulators, be they internal to government or external, if there is no check against them. As a voter, you can’t do the usual checking if your brain has been partly shut down.

The Case of Child Trafficking and Violence to Children

What led me to write this article is the unbelievable problem we ae having, both in Australia and the US, in regard to the outrageous harm being done to children. Many of us have taken our complaint to any or all authorities. We get nowhere. I can tell you of three mothers whose situation I have carefully checked that are deprived of their kid for no reason.

Two of them have not laid eyes on their offspring for many years. This is perpetrated by some individuals who are protected from arrest for committing such malice. They control all the parts of government that stand to punish them or even identify them publicly. You could have solid evidence against them and it would still go nowhere. Guaranteed.

My question for the moment is: How many of the government people that carry out the bidding of these manipulators are mind-controlled? In some cases, you can watch their behavior and recognize the symptoms of mind control.

There are laws against civil servants neglecting their duties (not to mention laws against them aiding and abetting crime). So the public could come in and act, such as via citizen’s arrest. But there again, the pubic seems mind-controlled and will very likely withdraw from the situation that seems not-real — the police breaking into a home to take the kid away from safety!

Nullability

As I have discussed at length in my book Prosecution for Treason, many behaviors by police — or by doctors and nurses in the matter of coerced vaccination — are unconstitutional. That is to say, the legislation that enables these behaviors are against one or more amendments in our beloved Bill of Rights. (For vaccination, look at Amendments 4, 9, and 10, especially the last four words of 10).

The US Supreme Court is supposed to rule all unconstitutional laws as null and void. Indeed, such laws are null even without a ruling by SCOTUS. That is the whole point of our having a Constitution — it is the basic law to which all legislation must conform.

“Good morning Officer, you can’t search me, as the Fourth Amendment says “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects…shall not be violated.”

I tried that recently on an officer and it didn’t work. But it would work if citizens knew about it, and thus police would know about it, too. Instead what we have is ever-increasing loss of privacy and often wanton brutality by “law enforcement.”

But I am law enforcement, and so are you. In fact, it is an inherent duty of the citizen to band with others to protect the Constitution.

In regard to strip searches, the US Supreme Court sold us down the river in 2012 in the Albert Florence case. I notice that the court upholds the Constitution in picky matters but does not do its duty in holding back the obvious advent of the police state.

That’s your job, like it or not. Please get onto it. There is no time to waste. If the majority of folks are mind controlled and won’t help you (and will ridicule you or condemn you), that’s just tough cookies. Or as we say in Australia, stiff bickies. It still falls on you to do the job.

Maybe later the folks will thank you. A policeman in the US recently whispered “Thank you” to me, after he saw me stand up for the Constitution. That precious remark will keep me going for a long time!

SHARE

38 COMMENTS

    • Talk about pith! In that 2015 article, I noted that Constitution.org has given us a free PDF download of David Hoffman’s excellent book on the Oklahoma City Bombing.

      So I goes to that pdf, and did I ever find a spot-on quote from the master, Machiavelli. Are you ready? Here t’is:

      "All men will see what you seem to be; only a few will know what you are, and those few will not dare to oppose the many who have the majesty of the state on their side to defend them."
      — Niccolo Machiavelli, 1532 A.D.

      Shite.

  2. We are all mind controlled and trying to control others. Think it’s natural as a human response. Good parents may push all snakes are dangerous if they don’t have time to show the subtle differences and safe handling practices or may not know themselves. Better safe than sorry.
    Goes back to year dot. Think this has been hijacked, some 10,000 years, hard to say with history actively removed as part of a modus.
    I’m not American but I didn’t like the US constitution, from when the feds could print money if member states could or would not,then bill them. Articles of confederation is good The bill of rights is just a written common natural understanding, it does not need saying, it is. Australia has none, we seem to backwards in unison anyways.
    Mary I was wondering if there where flag raising and anthem singing always connected to the constitution and where you happy there.
    I had the pleasure of a military type school but hated every day and the system. Still have my closest mates today from there though. These are all hijacked mind control systems, so subtle and pervasive that it seems natural.
    The vax has a very long history, even recorded before the US, I see glimpses in destroyed ancient history. Its always been an inflicted brutal mind control system, hidden as a penance, but delivered strategically by the hijacker.
    I have worked in industry, with high paid staff looking down from the top floor and labeling the street people junkies. Then turned up and bupa nurses(this place had health insurance like US), wanting to flu vax everyone. The junkies lined up and me laughed at for saying no thanks, I’m into informed consent, my nicest way out. Most had semi chronic persistent problems. So mind controlled they think they need to mandatorily help me like the crazy school.

  3. To answer your question, Simon, there was no connection in my past between flaggie-type stuff (which does not hit my goosebump-ometer) and anthem singing (which does) and the big Con.

    By the way I love the Australian abbreviation for its Constitution but I would have trouble introducing “Con” to the northerners. So far I’ve not even succeeded in introducing such indispensable Oz slang as “twig.”

    What I call my “love” for the US Con is not emotional. I have no feelings of that kind for it, just admiration for the math it performs. The nearest science for it would be hydraulics I think.

    And although we were fed the Con in grade school, I did not “love” it till I found out what we were doing in Latin America, circa 1980s, which was very unCon. If I can find a relevant quote about Honduras I will print it.

    Simon, the 29th Amendment should be “Human purity against the Bupa Troopas’ needles shall not be infringed.” Or “Congress shall make no law inhibiting a virus’s right to thrive.” Not that an amendment is needed, as the last four words of the Bill of Rights’ 10th Amendment are [Other rights not enumerated are reserved to the states] OR TO THE PEOPLE.

    • The song isn’t ‘inclusive’ enough, it refers to “father and mother”. Then there is all that ‘toxic masculinity’ about fathers fighting, and ‘sexism’ as women are stereotyped as homebodies. Wait until the progressive liberals find out what is in that song…

    • I know you wanted me to (again) mention the “Babies on Bayonets” as one example. More generally the [Viscount James] Bryce Report:” Report of the Committee on Alleged German Outrages (1914-15)” – commissioned by Tavistock, the source of atrocity propaganda for the past 100+ years. The Bryce Report in particular was the clincher in successfully bringing about the World War Part I and II.

  6. From TheHill.com:

    New Zealand’s countrywide ban on most semiautomatic weapons has gone into effect. The ban took effect Saturday after a six-month gun buyback program and amnesty period came to an end.

    The buyback began as part of a push to stem gun violence following a mass shooting on two mosques in Christchurch in March that left 51 people dead.

    More than 56,000 prohibited firearms had been collected from about 32,000 people through the buyback program, according to Minister of Police Stuart Nash. The ban applied to military-style semiautomatic weapons as well as some gun parts.

  7. https://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2019-12-21/nsw-holder-saturday-chicken-pox/11818454

    Know Jenner loved the cow pox, who has the patent on chicken.
    Had it a couple of times, no immunity, must have got the second lot from a dirty vax shredder.
    If you medicos are on to this, why do we have so many immune compromised. Does not logically connect with fitter faster stronger smarter, does it.
    Cow pox, chicken pox, nothing compared to when you get the Spanish flu, cough cough..

    • Auto-immunity is the new and lucrative disease process of the West. People still live long enough to work up to a reasonable age, they spend lots of money on chronic illness management (personally or via the welfare of the State), and they die suitably young, thus not requiring long term care in old age. And if the Mum also has a vaccine-damaged child requiring constant care and expensive treatments……well who said that prisons have to have walls?

  9. I suppose Mary that you could say that the power of the US Constitution is evident from the size of the end runs that have to be made around it to subvert it.

  12. Sharing Robbie Thorpe’s truth telling and his fight for justice…

    http://www.internationalcrimesdatabase.org/Case/951/Thorpe-v-Kennett/

    Robert Alan Thorpe submitted a request to charge then Premier of the State of Victoria, Jeffrey Kennett. According to Thorpe, Kennett was guilty of committing genocide by causing, with the intent to destroy, serious mental harm to the Gunai under Boorun. Secondly, Thorpe alleged that Kennett had not prevented continuing genocide by refusing to take the following measures: a declaration to end hostilities, a recognition of the Gunai/Kurnai under Boorum and an express adoption of the Genocide Convention. Thirdly, Thorpe claimed that Thorpe attempted, incited and conspired and had been an accomplice in numerous acts, ‘committed with the intent to destroy the original peoples of the land, causing mental harm to the original peoples of the land and deliberately imposing upon the original peoples of the land conditions of life calculated to destroy each people in whole or in part.’ The Chief Magistrate dismissed the proceedings for want of jurisdiction on the basis that the offence of genocide did not form part of domestic law in Australia. The appellant appealed against this decision. After this appeal was rejected, due to the fact that the appellant had failed to make out a prima facie case, Thorne appealed at the Supreme Court.http://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/IndigLawB/2000/47.html

    Watson, Irene — “Talking Up Aboriginal Law in a Sea of Genocide: Interview with Robbie Thorpe” [2000] IndigLawB 47; (2000) 5(1) Indigenous Law Bulletin 14

    Talking Up Aboriginal Law In A Sea Of Genocide: Interview With Robbie Thorpe

    • Typo correction. Diane wants me to report that her phrase “Thirdly, Thorpe claimed that Thorpe attempted” should be:

      “Thorpe claimed that Kennett attempted….”

      (As we now know, Kennett was a very big power player.)

      • From
        Watson, Irene — “Talking Up Aboriginal Law in a Sea of Genocide: Interview with Robbie Thorpe” [2000] IndigLawB 47; (2000) 5(1) Indigenous Law Bulletin 14

        Robbie’s reply.

        “People should realise Jeff Kennett wrote the constitution for this country. Victoria got a new constitution in 1995 which will be the blueprint for the other one, the national constitution. And they’ve done that because they stood over our native title. And they got away with it down here. Richard Court tried to do it in Western Australia, but the whole country jumped on Richard Court, and they let Kennett do it.”

  13. Robbie Thorpe knows what mind control has done to humanity.

    Robbie Thorpe 20 20 VISION – No pride in Genocide and Ecocide

    Australia is a Crime Scene’ – Robbie Thorpe — Part 1 —
    11,634 views•Feb 24, 2009
    part 1

    part 2

    • Diane, I don’t see how a treaty would help.

      I think emphasis on the current genocide is the way to go, at least to stop the continuation of it.

      Beats me how any society can correct the wrongdoing of past generations. If anyone sees how it can be done, pray tell. Ta.

  14. Do we like how DJT has signed an executive order that Judaism is now a nationality, a ‘protected class’ (and who is not in a protected class?)

    From Alan Dershowitz, Professor Emeritus of Law at Harvard University:
    “For 65 of my 81 years I have spent at universities all over the country all over the world there is no more important event in those 65 years to turn universities away from being bastions of hatred and discrimination than this executive order being signed today. It is a game changer. It will go down in history as one of the most important events in the 2,000 year battle against anti-semitism. Thank you, Mr President, you did a great great job the people who helped you do this did a great great job and you will be remembered by history for all time for having signed this very important order. Thank you (Shakes hand of DJT)”

    (2,000 year war against anti-semitism?)

    • Yeah, haven’t you heard, the only ‘bad’ guys are the Zionists. Unfortunately, they have only been around since the end of the 19th Century. The previous 1,900 years was just a bunch of irrational prejudice to someone’s beliefs (not what they did, but what they ‘believed’). – Sometimes ‘prejudice’ is also referred to as ‘discernment’.

      Could you imagine an Executive Order that Christianity is now a nationality?

      • This might interest you Terry

        I’ll try and freeze this to start at 7:35 but you could listen from say 2:30 for some background after a slow start and go to around 10:00

        Rabbi Mendel Kessin:
        21st Century #47 | The Deeper Meaning of the Trump Impeachment Hearings

        In particularly at 8:40 when God changed the form of Esau (pronounced “asov’) – Edom – Rome – Christianity – Western Civilisation. And there you have it.

  16. How extreme – I mean topical (past threads but here also) – reminds me of what happened in Berlin in ?1933

    ** RUSSIA TERMINATES SCIENTOLOGY!! The End of Religious Cults in Russia….**

    From 00:35
    “and make no mistake – it (religious cults] IS – a business

    “And the business of religious sects and cults is inextricably linked to brainwashing and to mass financial extortion … “

  17. I think it was something Terry said – I know you will like this if you haven’t already seen it…

    Caitlin Johnstone – *Why Everything Is F**ked“

    https://caitlinjohnstone.com/2019/12/22/why-everything-is-fucked/

    "We all slid out of the womb an itty bitty helpless information sponge into a world full of mentally ill giants who couldn’t wait to fill our tiny skulls with all of their inner demons. And now everything, understandably, is f**ked."

    “This newfound capacity for complex abstract thought burst onto this frantic, confusing scene and was quickly seized and manipulated by the cleverer primates.“

C'mon Leave a Reply, Debate and Add to the Discussion

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.