Home Earth/ Climate Which Came First Flatulence or Climate Change?

Which Came First Flatulence or Climate Change?

29

By Malcolm R. Hughes

Those of us with basic intelligence and education know that the Earth’s climate is dominated by the solar flare activity on the Sun. When there is little solar flare activity, the climate on our planet is cooler and vice-versa when that activity is high. There has always been and always will be climate change from one era to another. If it is gradual mankind will adapt.

Can anyone give me a realistic reason why in the CO2 versus climate change ridiculous nonsense, is it that only the cow and cow farmers are being blamed for the so-called problem? Of course the red meat eater, milk drinker user of custard, cream and ice cream are partly to blame as well. Don’t crickets and insects, to put it crudely, fart? If humans gave away eating red meat and replaced that diet with more fruit and vegetable we would also create far greater volumes of carbon dioxide. I had a bowl of cooked porridge (oats) for breakfast this morning, guess what happened when I arose from my desk moments ago?

Not only is the cow being blamed for excessive CO2 but also for the possible importation and spreading of a possible foot and mouth disease epidemic into Australia. Where do the morons that we refer to as politicians get their gall? They certainly don’t use their brains nor have done any research into either subject (as with the Covid-19 hoax).

I don’t remember Bill Gates or Klaus Slobs volunteering to come to Australia to round up and eradicate the possibly millions of feral cloven hoofed animals roaming the Australian outback. You know those that eat a similar diet as a cow. We know them as camels, donkeys, buffaloes, goats and what about the millions of sheep in farmers paddocks around our continent. Then there are non-hoofed, herbaceous wild animals such as kangaroos, koalas, rabbits, emus and possums creating CO2. Oh deary me, everywhere we look CO2 is rising into the atmosphere to create havoc. That’s just to mention from the continent of Australia.

That statement above is not an invitation to either of those very sick individuals to visit Australia. We have a sufficient number of sick, in our local population after the Gates- Slobs “vaccine” was introduced via mandate to our once thriving country.

From memory the continent of North America once had a huge number of grass eating animals that would exude similar quantities of CO2 as our humble cow. The numbers of those beasts, bison, deer, horse, bear and antelope I would imagine far outnumber all the farmed animals in Australia or possibly the World. There were also smaller animals such as hare and beaver that created CO2, did they not?

In Africa there were herds of huge (in size) animals elephant, hippopotamus, rhinoceros and gnu, zebra, deer, cattle and giraffe, all herbaceous eaters.

Wildebeest migration in Africa

The other continents except Antarctica had their grass eating animals as well. However since the numbers of these free animals have decreased in numbers due to human expansion across the landscape so too has the number of cattle to replace the former animal domains, increased. But before this transition happened nobody complained that animals in the “wild” were creating climate change. There are no historical records to prove that this was the case.

On another tact and this is coming from a long time punter, has anyone heard that Charles and Camilla or any of the World’s royalty or elite are willing to empty their stables of their beloved four legged racing animals for the benefit of reducing man made CO2? No, neither have I.

Once again there are several so-called sports in place around our globe every week that depend on guzzling millions of litres of hydrocarbons for no sensible reason, apart from thrill seeking. This I propose creates millions of tonnes of CO2 each year.

It would be interesting to know if members of the Committee of 300, are red meat eaters. If they are not, maybe this is the reason for their psychopathic dreams of grandeur. Is it possible that the nutrients in red meat prevent the major part of humanity from acting in a  psychopathic way? After all mankind has been a red meat eater since time immemorial.

If the cattle producing industry is done away with where are the elite, especially in the northern hemisphere, going to get their fashionable leather products such as jackets, skirts and coats. Other prestigious goods such as leather lounge suites would have to be forgotten  as well. We have already removed leather footwear from production to shoes and sandals now made of plastics. Of course plastics produced from hydrocarbons couldn’t possibly create CO2 emissions, could they?

Even though in my opinion, beef has lost it’s flavour and texture compared to a few years ago due to genetic modification it is better than no beef at all. My suggestion to cow cockies is to go back to the old breeds that had flavour and less gristle.

As I commented in the article on 5th October : Why don’t we and the farmers just say to the nitwits that go on with this false story that CO2 creates climate change, “if you don’t want to live on a planet with CO2, take an overdose or a genuine Covid “vaccine” course. Don’t forget the booster shots.”

SHARE

29 COMMENTS

  1. It seems the EVIDENCE of this allegation of climate change, has been thrown out the window in Europe. A place where they embraced this claim with open arms and are now paying the price for their stupidity. Take note how quickly they have reversed everything they claimed was damaging the atmosphere. Worse, they even provide the means to worsen the damage by supporting this war in Ukraine. Kinda contradicts every claim they have ever made on this issue. L.O.L.

    • It’s a patent denial of evidence that’s driven largely by a fear of mortality/change
      And the effect goes to the fact that, to fear death is to fear life itself; there’s simply no room for logic

  2. “Those of us with basic intelligence and education know that the Earth’s climate is dominated by the solar flare activity on the Sun”.

    Acts 7:49-51
    49
    ‘Heaven is My throne,
    And earth is My footstool.
    What house will you build for Me? says the Lord,
    Or what is the place of My rest?
    50
    Has My hand not made all these things?’

    Malachi 4:2
    But to you who fear My name
    The Sun of Righteousness shall arise
    With healing in His wings;
    And you shall go out
    And grow fat like stall-fed calves.

  5. Yair, Mal, but even more interestingly, a mainly plant based diet tends to produce some methane by the digestion of some fairly insoluble carbohydrates by microbes in the moderately anaerobic guts of all fauna. Which is why and how some wags (usually adolescent) could set fire to their farts. However! by far the greatest land based producers of methane are white ants (termites) (estimated to produce about 75% of the methane emitted other than that produced in the anaerobic conditions in stagnant waters). I can only imagine how much methane might be produced by a pod of 50 ton whales each eating several tons of food every day. Perhaps we should mount a campaign to “save the Earth” by getting rid of all the whales, termites, etc. etc.

    Another interesting fact is that high protein diets (particularly meat) tends to produce an amount of hydrogen sulphide (H2S, “rotten egg gas”) the stinky ones. (Ever had the dog fart in your car with all the windows closed?)

    Carbon dioxide and water is the usual products of the complete aerobic metabolism of carbohydrates in all organisms and the CO2 is mostly “breathed out” in respiration. Even plants “breathe out” CO2 in the dark.

    Anyhow, all these “horrid, Earth destroying” gasses have been in the natural cycle of life since the get-go.

    By the way, methane and hydrogen sulphide gradually oxidise in air and sunlight to water, CO2, and SO2 to get back into the cycle.

    • Olddavid, thanks for mentioning termites. I was at a lecture years ago where the presenter mentioned that termites produce more carbon dioxide in ONE YEAR than all the automobiles since the invention of automobiles.

      • I think you missed the point, Terry.

        The hype that these malicious looneys are trying to flog is that domesticated cattle produce methane in burps and farts and that methane is “many times more potent” as a “greenhouse gas” than carbon dioxide. That doesn’t seem to fly very well so now they try to demonise “nitrogen” excretion in urine and dung as the “Earth killing” effect of keeping domesticated cattle for human consumption.

        I don’t think that these galahs are just styoopud; they are maliciously perverse.

  8. Another interesting take on the agenda.
    Interesting to note that approximately 100 major food processing plants around the world have mysteriously burnt down.
    It is reported , that 14 in the USA , mysteriously burnt down on the ONE night .
    The latest is from France , it is said to be the largest food processing plant in the world.

    https://www.stopworldcontrol.com/bugs

  11. Water is a natural solvent. Rain water is acidic due to carbon dioxide picked up in the atmosphere.

    Any water soluble gas becomes more soluble as temperature decreases because, in and of themselves, gas molecules have little affinity for each other — after all, that is why they are gases. When dissolved in water, CO2 forms weak bonds with the water molecules. The lower the temperature, the stronger the bonds, the greater the amount of CO2 that can be dissolved.

    Carbon dioxide is more soluble in cold water than it is in warm water.

    Water and CO2 make carbonic acid (acid rain).

    Plants need carbon and water.

    So it makes sense to me that convection causes latent heat carrying water vapour to rise, then cool when it gets high enough, condense to form clouds, and release latent heat which continues to rise. CO2 then exercises its affinity for water which falls as a weak carbonic acid when the formation of droplets reach a certain size.

    I can’t see how it would be possible for anyone to explain how Co2 or water vapour can form a greenhouse blanket around the Earth reflecting heat back to Earth. Blankets work both ways.

    ………………………….

    CO2 is only 0.0385% of the atmosphere and is the heaviest gas in the atmosphere which is why plants are able to utilise it in the respiration process.

    Carbon Dioxide Not a Well Mixed Gas and Can’t Cause Global Warming
    By: John O’Sullivan

    “………CO2: The Heavy Gas that Heats then Cools Faster!

    The same principle is applied to heat transfer, the Specific Heat (SH) of air is 1.0 and the SH of CO2 is 0.8 (heats and cools faster). Combining these properties allows for thermal mixing.

    Heavy CO2 warms faster and rises, as in a hot air balloon. It then rapidly cools and falls………………”

    https://co2insanity.com/2011/09/04/top-scientists-in-heated-debate-over-%E2%80%98-slaying-of-greenhouse-gas-theory/

    ………………………………………………..

    From “CO2 Spin on that” – a site no long available –

    ……..In his memoirs entitled “Contributions to Molecular Physics in the Domain of Radiant Heat”, detailing a series of experiments conducted at the Royal Institution, Tyndall fallaciously states with regard to Oxygen and Nitrogen that they are both quote:
    “practically transparent to radiant heat.”

    Thus laying the foundations of AGW fraud.

    This statement by John Tyndall is the origin of such claims as “the science is settled” and the “greenhouse effect is 150 year old established physics.” In terms of radiant heat it is the only factor that would differentiate between the various atmospheric gases.

    After all, Oxygen and Nitrogen constitute 99% of the atmosphere. If these two gases are shown to absorb and re-emit infrared radiation, what would make so called “Greenhouse Gases” like CO2, such a threat to the environment at only 0.0385% of the atmosphere?

    So the basis for the “Greenhouse Effect” is that incoming and out going IR is not absorbed by Oxygen and Nitrogen which instead passes straight through these gases.

  13. Actually the vengeance against the, quote, “millions of feral cloven hoofed animals roaming the Australian outback” is of the same league as the vengeance against beef production: both are rooted in eco-socialism

  14. WOrld population statistics if they can be believed seem to show Russian area 0% growth, most lother places about 1% growth and in many places in Africa or ending with “stan” the growth is highest

  15. In a sane Oz cows used to graze on farmlands. Today like battery hens, they are caged and eat dry food, possibly eating reconstituted droppings or even worse.
    The sooner traditional methods are restored the better all will be, otherwise it gets worse. Suits don’t know jack about life skills necessary for living, that’s why our world is chaos in disorder.

C'mon Leave a Reply, Debate and Add to the Discussion

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.