by Mary W Maxwell, LLB (Adel)
When Gumshoe was investigating the murders in Adelaide that have been associated with the late Alan Max McIntyre (1929-2017), I got a call from an Adelaidean, code-named Adella, in support of the work done by Rachel Vaughn to expose “Murderlaide.”
Adella told me things about the Child Protective Service that we had heard about before. I am personally willing to say that there is major criminality going on in departments that deal with children – and I think it is geographically widespread.
To discuss the subject is apparently against the law, per the Family Law Act (1975). (Note: in Australia the six states relinquished their power over family matters, in order that the Commonwealth government could legislate on marriage and child custody.)
Section 121 of the Family Law Act says:
“A person who publishes in a newspaper …, or otherwise disseminates to the public or to a section of the public by any means, any account of any proceedings… under this Act that identifies:
- a partyto the proceedings;
- a person who is … associated with, a partyto the proceedings or is, or [is] in any other way concerned in the matter to which the proceedings relate is guilty of an offence punishable, upon conviction by imprisonment for a period not exceeding one year.”
I will be pleased to be arrested for the crime of divulging the criminality of officials who perform crimes under a cloak of “privacy” from the law. I am certain such a charge couldn’t hold up in court, as it is – of course – a crime to prevent the reporting of crime.
Note: I am publishing all this without getting the permission of Adella, in order to protect her. She is welcome to announce her real name if she so wishes.
“They” Don’t Want Strong Family Life
Let me first lay out three different ways in which I came to have some sense of courts breaking up families for the wrong reasons. None of these had to do with pedophilia. That will have to become fourth on my list.
First there is “medical kidnap.” Parents lose custody of their children if they refuse to follow a doctor’s orders regarding drugs. A website, MedicalKidnap.com (part of Health Impact News) says: “We report on cases where children are taken away from their parents for disagreeing with their doctors.”
Bill Windsor, author of the Youtube series “Lawless America” did an interview with Diane Booth of Hawaii. In a Gumshoe article in 2015, I paraphrased that mother’s complaint:
“In California, I was told that I had to put my son on the medication Ritalin. I refused. To avoid having the state take my son from our home, I escaped with him to Canada and became a refugee, seeking political asylum. The FBI came up and stole my son. I haven’t seen him in years and cannot locate him. Vincent, if you hear this, please call.”
Second is the experimental approach taken by Tavistock and the CIA, on how to break the mother-child bond. In my February 26, 2018 obituary for Blanche Chavoustie, I showed how she was subjected to the mouse-trap experiment.
Two-year-old Blanche put her finger in a mousetrap and her mother (as instructed by the Morton Prince program at Harvard) would not come to her aid. Just think of it, a university going along with the idea that we should destroy the closest relationship of all, the mother-child bond.
Third, there is the more general effort to deliberately diminish the strength of families. This was revealed by Dr Richard Day, an employee of the maniacal David Rockefeller (1914-1916).
Day stated unabashedly in a 1969 speech to medical students, that men would be encouraged to work far from home, with cheap airfares, and then the fares would go up, leading to long marital separation or divorce.
(I don’t know if Dr Day was fully conscious of the fact that all of his revelations had to do with keeping society powerless so that a few Rockefeller types could be freed from challenge.)
Here Comes Number Four
It now appears that courts have been tasked with the destruction of families. I think they do this in deference to the state’s pedophile rings, alleged include the local elite.
Let’s get into the material supplied to me by Adella. She believes that if a mother reports pedophilia, whether to the police or some department of children’s services (such as the CPS), that this mother will have her kids removed from her. As a result, the court may assign the child to live with the pedophile father. Fascinating, huh?
My informant, Adella, told me (in almost exactly these words) yesterday, September 13, 2018:
“A mother this morning contacted me from Queensland after she was told by Child Services that the children’s disclosures were ‘unsubstantiated’. I have photos of her children’s writings describing how their father puts his doodle in their bum. I have audio recordings of them saying what he does to them.
“The emotion in these children is raw. There is no way that they are being coached. Child Services are wiping their hands of this case because it’s in the Family Court.
“I am dealing with another case here in Adelaide of a little 8-year-old girl who had evidence of sexual exploitation substantiated by Child Protective Services, then went to Family Court. The Judge ignored the evidence and said that there is ‘no risk of harm’ in relation to the father.
“A few days later, after a weekend visit with the father, she returned home with 2 large cuts on her leg. In any situation this would be considered to be aggravated assault. However, this child’s terror was ignored by police because ‘they don’t get involved in Family Court cases’. [Adella takes those cuts to be ‘ritual’ cuts.]
“It’s like banging your head against a brick wall when you go to CPS and the police. I’ve explained to them that the Chief Justice of the Family Court Diana Bryant stated that since the Family Court has no investigative powers, they rely on the state services such as police and CPS to investigate.
“Barristers have evidence of court records having been ‘edited.’ [Are you listening, Law colleagues? Do you have similar experience? A barrister who comments at GumshoeNews says it is commonplace for judges in NSW to tamper with their own records.]
“And lawyers throughout Australia are advising their clients not to raise issues of sexual abuse in the Family Court or they will lose custody to the abuser.
“Most people are in disbelief when I tell them of my situation because Mainstream Media will not touch it! It sounds illogical to people that this is a paedophile-protecting system!”
It Is a Global Thing; Adelaide Is Small Beer
I have lived in Adelaide for thirty-eight years, minus a few years of forays to other countries. I ‘married in‘ to Australia from the US. My late husband, George Maxwell, an Edinburgh graduate, was the very respected professor of paediatrics at the University of Adelaide.
Every fourth night he was on call to the emergency ward at Adelaide Children’s Hospital. He must have seen cases that looked suspicious. I imagine he reported them to police and would have assumed the matter would be investigated. After all, who would even entertain the notion that the POLICE were on guard to SUPPRESS such cases?
If George were here today, I think he would be persuaded by my evidence, accumulated over the last 13 years, that children are at risk even in good families. The Royal Commission into Institutional Response to Child Sexual Abuse, which ran from 2013 to 2017, showed how kids get exploited in all kinds of situations. At least one priest had his girl-victims sitting on his lap inside the Confessional box.
Regarding the pedophile-priest issue, it’s worldwide, as reported by mass maedia, but the real reason for it has not been revealed.
I was disappointed when Justice Peter McClellan recommended that the Catholic Church lift the requirement of celibacy for priests – as if the men involved were sexually frustrated and so had to turn to children. That is not the case. Those men were installed into seminaries in the first place to become the famous pedophile priests – for the purpose of harming religion.
The pedophile-priest problem is small beer. Pardon me, O survivors, for expressing it that way. Children are being harmed in many, many ways, including by being dumbed down, en masse, in schools.
Adelaide, too, is small beer. What is happening in that (otherwise beautiful) city is scandalous in the extreme, yet is par for the course. Consider how well it fits into the aforementioned Rockefeller plan. The goal is to knock out every institution, such as the family, that gives people strength. Only the men at the top are allowed to rule the world!
I therefore ask all citizens, even ones who prefer to steer clear of the child-sexual-abuse issue, to get in there and fight.
Let’s now hear a bit more from “Adella” on the case of the 8-year-old girl – whose rescue you all should be resolving to participate in, whatever it takes:
“This poor little girl has been hog-tied and raped by numerous men, photographed and filmed, drugged and now cut (branded). She’s also had knives cut her rectum (same as Rachel Vaughan) and came home on many occasions with blood-soaked underwear.
“Finally, the Department of Child Protection stepped in after numerous mandatory notifications — including from myself and the child’s doctor and psychologist. The child has been removed from her protective mother by DCP for an “Intervention and Assessment Order” through the Youth Court.
“That was 15 weeks ago, and yet the DCP have done very little investigating except for witch-hunting the mother, claiming she must have mental health issues. I assure you she does not. The Youth Court has not yet referred the case to Child Protective Services, where she can potentially be forensically examined and interviewed.
“And now the DCP is seeking a 6-month Guardianship Order!!! How can this be justified??? Nothing makes sense.
“The mother has already had 6 mental health reports over the past 2 years, none of which of course demonstrated that she has a mental illness. She’s been ordered to have a 7th — by a psychiatrist whose only specialty is in Dementia and whose own wife fell to her death off a balcony!
“Police have come to the mother’s house to collect ‘evidence’ …..a pair of green shorts that were bloodstained. The officer ‘forgot’ her receipt book and returned with the shorts a few days later — washed. Other pairs of undies and also a dress with presumed semen on it has gone ‘missing’…..oh no it just went to another station…..oh no we found it….but lost it again. This is deliberate incompetence by the police.
“Well, we know exactly which police are supporting this circus…….but in the meantime there is a little girl that has been deliberately scared by the exact government services that are supposed to be protecting her. This mother is beside herself with worry and only has one hour of ‘supervised contact’ per week with her.”
Readers are hereby advised to see even worse matters covered at Fiona Barnett’s website www.pedophilesdownunder.com.
And I invite everyone to refresh their memory about Rachel Vaughn’s personally documented history of trying to get the attention of police, parliamentarians, and other official organizations, in regard to helping a child at risk.
Oh, and why don’t I repeat my list of some of the persons Rachel contacted unavailingly. I ask: should we assume they are complicit?
David Ridgeway, MP
Dennis Hood, MP
Paedophile Task Force, Queensland (Denzel Clarke, Task Force Argus)
Doug Barr, Det. Insp. Major Crime
Paul Holloway, MP
Michael O’Connor, Victims of Crime Officer
Ted Mulligan, QC, Mulligan Inquiry
Australian Federal Police
Kris Hannah, MP
Jane Lomax-Smith, MP
Michael Atkinson, MP
Jay Weatherill, MP
Carmel Zollo, MP
Nick Xenophon, MP
Det. Supt. Phillip Hoff (SAPOL)
Attorney-General Robert McClelland, MP
Come on, troops, get into action. Don’t wait for a messiah to show you what to do. You weren’t born yesterday — you can figure out a proper response to the outrageous situation of judges acting in behalf of pedophiles.
— Mary W Maxwell is author of “Fraud Upon the Court: Reclaiming the Law, Joyfully.” Yep. Joyfully.
Dear Mary,you are gifted in your determination to stop and interrupt the depravity of these evil people.May God assist you in every possible way to eliminate these cursed human beings.
Thank you, Gaz. Let me re-iterate that as a resident of Adelaide i have been wholly in the dark about these practices.
Which practices? the pedo stuff? No. The court stuff. And of course the legislative stuff and the bureaucracy “infrastructure” which must have been very carefully planned many years ago.
“Father, forgive then for they know not what they do.”
Oops, I mean “Father forgive them IF they know not what they do.”
If they’re aware of supporting men who cut children, what possible room is there for forgiveness? None in my books thank you very much.
(Ask Youtube for the Lawless America series. Unbelievable!)
yes. Thank you mary for everything you are doing in name of proper accountability and ethical systems – the billboards strategy is also good. we must organize this
The wheels are in motion expect an investigation from today tonight very soon. Times up for these pedo crims, the problem is getting the public to be less apathetic and step out of their own little worlds. How do we do that, well we have to relate on common ground. Adverts billboards etc, saying “what if your child was in trouble, would you do something then?
” dont sit back waiting for the authorities, why would they investigate themselves?
I will personally place billboards, once i put a strategy together, it has to happen fast and prolifically, so people cant dismiss
The billboards is a great idea Steve!!! Like what Benjamin Franklin said “Justice won’t be served until those who are unaffected are as outraged as those who are”……..more people need to know about our paedophile protecting government!!!
Thank you. And never worry that the numbers are too small. About 4 years ago I saw a lady in Rundle Mall, standing smack-dab in front of David Jones holding up a sign “Stay out of Syria.”
Not an impressive number — one — but much better than nothing. And she didn’t look Syrian. She just knew right from wrong.
Mary thats a great piece of writing, heart breaking and terrifying as it is people need to know
What reason could expect that the villains would “crime” themselves just because of a few complaints when the villains know that they hold all the aces and own the management?
I still contend that Sodom will only be spared if the “ordinary people” defy the oligarchy and promote ordinary people of integrity to positions that can represent their interests against the secretocracy. Of course, such “interests” would begin in a crude self interest in self-preservation and the preservation of cultural and national identity for the most basic purpose of handing on their cultural assets to their children.
Much as yous might hate the idea it is the very first Commandment that deals with purely human relationships. “Honour your father and mother”. Anyhow, if we despise Nature we have no redress against the perverts who seek to subvert it.
Olddavid, L.O.L. Quote, “if the “ordinary people” defy the oligarchy and promote ordinary people of integrity to positions that can represent their interests against the secretocracy.” Unquote. Sorry if I seem to be coming on too strong in response to your post. But the REALITY is, no matter how many “ordinary” people you stand up to replace these evil S.O.B.’s the fact is, these “ordinary” people do not have the mindset of these Evil ones, and the moment these “ordinary” people are slotted into the spot, the process of undermining,and determination to make them complicit in their evil ways begins. Been there, done that. You don’t even know that such a process even exists, seemingly innocent requests are made of you, and if you comply, you already have one foot in their door. The manipulation has to be experienced to be believed, because if your were told about it, you simply would not believe it. That’s how they operate, and that’s why they are successful at what they do. People simply cannot fathom that there are such evil, vile people sharing the same air that we all breathe. Once we can get over that hurdle, we might be able to see daylight, but I seriously doubt it. The case I was involved with,a fellow was elevated to a higher position, immediately after his elevation, he was called in to discuss an issue and was required to answer with a positive decision. The fact that he was part of a committee and thus had no power to agree to anything, didn’t seem to occur to him. I pulled him aside later, explained the FACTS to him and he broke down and cried, a grown man, he simply could not see the evil in what he was complicit in until it was explained to him, what was done, and deliberately done too. Hopefully he learned a lesson from that, but I seriously doubt it. People, (unless they are exceptional pigheaded, thick skulled antagonists, and HATE bullies (like I do) will always seek the easy way out and go with the flow, never making waves, and attracting attention to themselves.
It’s hard to fault your pessimism, Eddy.
But let’s say the folks in general came to understand that one member of a committee does matter if he says No.
Let’s say it became popular to say No. Committee strength would collapse.
Also how about a committee of homicidal dads? (I am quoting Phil from the other day, re cancer. Or was it Tony? it was one of them two angry fellows.)
Rachel Vaughan’s testimony highlights the 1966 “Disappearance of the Beaumont Children” case in South Australia, unresolved after half a century. It also raises serious concerns regarding the Mullighan Report, (a 600-page Royal Commission report of sex abuse against Australia’s children in state care over four decades) where the names of perpetrators were suppressed, and the truth locked away by the South Australian government for 80 years.
Peter Lewis was a member of South Australia’s state parliament. A known maverick, he is now deceased. Look at how he shares Eddy’s view — but if he had had the testimony of Fiona or Rachel to hand he would not have been stumped. he said:
“I [was] bringing some of the people who had made the allegations to the point where they might pluck up enough courage and confidence and swear the truth of those allegations, enabling them to be more carefully investigated. But they were being ‘bumped off’– that is, murdered and viciously assaulted – quicker than I could get them to write down their allegations.
“The most outrageous thing of all [is] the related and organised activities of those pedophiles in high public office – that is, the judiciary, the senior ranks of human services portfolios, some police and MPs, across the nation….”
Ah, notice that he mentions “the senior ranks of human services.”
It should be easy enough for South Australian to arrange to interview the senior ranks of human services in SA as there are not a whole load of them.
(And, you’ll admit, a “human service officer” is just not as naturally intimidating as police or as off-putting as a vice-regal.)
Funny word, isn’t it — a vice-regal.
Eddy, who’s your current vice-regal?
Dear Gumshoers,
Got two hours to spare for the terrorized children? Please write to these two “child protection” officials in SA — Taylor is a bureaucrat, Sanderson is a parliamentarian. I have copied their bio’s from a government website.
Feel free to quote from our Fiona Barnett series, our Here Comes the Avalanche series, or our Adelaide Mysteries Series. Defo send a link to the ICNJ testimonials of Rachel Vaughan and ask if they have viewed it. Pleeeeease.
“Cathy Taylor was appointed Cheif Executive of SA’s new Department for Child Protection in September, 2016.
“She has also led legislative reform in relation to Queensland’s Child Protection Act 1999, Adoptions Act 2009 and Domestic and Family Violence Protection Act 2012.
“Practising as a solicitor in her early career, Cathy went on to become the inaugural coordinator for Women’s Legal Aid Queensland. She holds a Bachelor of Laws from the Queensland University of Technology.”
“The Hon Rachel Sanderson MP has been the member for Adelaide since 2010 and is Minister for Child Protection. She served as Shadow Minister for …Volunteers; Youth; and Higher Education. She holds a Bachelor of Arts (Accounting). She maintains strong connections with the children … she serves.
Ms Sanderson was a small business owner, managing Rachel’s Model Management & Training. She has been actively involved in a range of volunteering activities including The North Adelaide Society and Prospect Blair Athol Lions Club. She also undertook a study tour to New York City … so she could apply that learning in South Australia. [You could ask her if she found any pedo problem there.]
Gumshoers, please be blunt with them, asking them to explain Peter Lewis’s remark, as above. Send a CC of your efforts to: mary.maxwell@alumni.adleaide.edu.au. Ta.
Here is something interesting. The obituary of Peter Lewis says two members of his staff were charged with defamation for faxing to the media a report of pedophiles in office.
I would be glad to fax names if I had evidence. Anyway, a jury let them off. See:
https://www.news.com.au/national/south-australia/peter-lewis-dead-former-speaker-of-the-house-passes-away-at-75/news-story/fb1ddf737171e649e22555ad907c2b8a
This man bill Malone, I have followed for years, great guy, also a VICTIM of abuse!! He is very reachable for any discussion…AND you better believe, the Queen, Queen mother, Prince Phillip, Charles ARE Pedophiles/ Murderers!!
https://youtu.be/nxsUrTWJ93c
https://youtu.be/jiz6zN9rHO0
https://youtu.be/MObcW1aKODk
https://youtu.be/vS-clymoR60
https://youtu.be/ORU5x-ryedU
https://youtu.be/I_WTpE0tcQE
https://youtu.be/0WI3gCyL63k
https://youtu.be/PmrAQXhLfi4
Thanks Cherri, I tried the first one and then on the sidebar I found the lady who was on the ITNJ talking to Rachel, Carine Hutsebart.
So i watched part of her video and can say we should all listen from minute 31 to 37 as she explains the emotional vulnerability of the perps, especially violent murderers.
Sorry I never utubed , maybe mentioned , prince michael of kent , major interface enabler.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince_Michael_of_Kent
He leads the freemasons but shhhh, its a secret
Alyssa Dandrea, writes in The Concord Monitor today, about the outcome of a lawsuit against St Paul’s School New Hampshire, where children were abused. She says;
“Attorney General Gordon MacDonald announced the settlement agreement, which establishes the position of an independent monitor who wiill be tasked with ensuring that St Paul’s is in compliance with the state’s mandatory report laws.” [Isn’t that ridiculous, paying a new employee to do what other were already legally required to do.]
“The attorney general is FOREGOING PROSECUTION [how dare he?] following a 14-month long investigation in favor of what he calls ‘comprehensive reform’.”
This makes me wonder — have never really thought about it — how much discretion does an AG have, in regard to prosecuting anything? I can see that the victims may choose a money settlement, most do.
But on what grounds do Attorneys General decide to let criminals be spared a prosecution?
By the way, I must write to Vickie Chapman again. Her secretary replied to my letter saying I should go to the Minister for Policing. (Quel joke.) This was in regard to Rachel Vaughan’s ITNJ testimony, in which she shows how hard she tried to get action against a murderer.
My view of the problem of police not responding isn’t that a Minister should intervene. It requires prosecution by the state Attorney General (Vickie Chapman), as the actions by the non-responding police are criminal.
Anybody care to say if I am correct or mistaken about that?
And don’t bring up the subject of the DPP — I get upset.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-09-16/anglican-church-horrified-over-national-redress-calculations/10236812
So where is Senator Deryn Hinch? (Derryn??)
Come on Deryn, you went to gaol for disclosing a pedaphile (or two) and gained great kudos which helped you get your gig.
Been quiet lately, have you not?
Have a word with your old running retired mate; senator Heffernam. He might fill you in.
If you do not, just disappear. We know a BSer.
Come on give us a comment.
You have privilege in parliament, you have all this info.
Just go have dinner and go back to sleep in the Senate and dream of a kidney or two and enjoy your super in due course.
Funny how they don’t want anyone to know the name of; or anything about any person associated with a pedo case but they want us all to know all about some half baked tavistockised “lone wolf” terro.
Royal Commission into institutional response into child sexual abuse was not inclusive to catholic church survivors – there were over 4000 institutions named where child sexual abuse had occurred – yet media focused on catholic church – men who wore white collars – and the brutal medical sexual crimes – irrefutable evidence – against non pregnant girls and young pregnant girls during late 50’s – mid 70’s – were extensively report in submissions and private hearings to Commissioners – yet the media have refused to write anything about these crimes against humanity including the illegal removal of newborn babies – baby trafficking crimes that also occurred – with false adoption statistics – and because the media have refused to even write one little article about the medical crimes – history today through child protection failed system is repeating the past crimes – the present Commonwealth inquiry into local adoptions is refusing to allow mothers voices to be raised at public hearings – are refusing to place all submissions for public debate – women politicians bullying and intimidating women (mothers) yet they are crying foul as women politicians they are being bullied and intimidating and they are doing the same to non women politicians – they are encouraging the failed child protection system – pointing the finger at mothers as being the perpetrators of crimes against their own children – not the males – Australia has fallen off its axis when it comes to protecting families – assisting families – to remain together – destroying families to appease those who cannot produce their own offspring – history repeating itself – women’s voices have been raised since 1969 for the voices of women to be heard – voices of women who speak for their children or for mothers who are too frightened to speak themselves – advocacy group who will not be silenced – as mothers and children are two most precious gems in our society today – with the abuse of women and children continually concealed – well written article above – so many serious issues that are not being addressed in our Nation today – to protect motherhood – mother and child and to stamp out cruelty to children
My good friend is going through this right now, also in Adelaide too.
Desperate for help and any advice
Is it possible to have this Adellas contact details? Kym Ford please pass on my details..