by Dee McLachlan
Another year has circled by, and now it is seventeen years since two “planes” flew into the twin towers, and traumatized people across the globe. It was a deceit on the people of unimaginable proportions.
Several years ago when Joshua Anthony Frydenberg, now the Treasurer of Australia and Deputy Leader of the Liberal Party, entered parliament, his first question was about 9-11. It was really a statement denigrating those questioning the False Flag event. The then prime minister of Australia, Julia Gillard, called it “stupid and wrong” to question the official narrative of 19 Arabs attacking New York and the Pentagon.
I just can’t wrap my head around how humans in powerful positions could orchestrate such a thing on their own people. Many articles recently on Gumshoe have been referring to the Luciferian agenda with regard to pedophilia, child trafficking and sacrifices. It’s the only one that makes sense, considering the 3,000 people that were murdered (or sacrificed) that day.
So for the purposes of educating Mr Frydenberg, I will list off some of the many abnormalities from the 9-11 attacks — again.
Building 7 was not hit by a plane, yet this 47 storey skyscraper (that had no significant fire damage) came down in a perfect demolition-style collapse at 5.20 pm later that same day. It was demolished, and Larry Silverstein (the leaseholder of the WTC) stated in a PBS documentary that, “maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it. And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse.”
Bobby McIlvaine’s son, Bobby Jnr, was killed by an explosion in the lobby — unrelated to the the plane impact 93 floors above. Evidence of explosive materials and a sophisticated demolition of both towers is clearly visible in videos, and active thermitic material was found in the dust. Multi-ton steel sections and concrete slabs were ejected laterally for hundreds of feet, and several tons of molten metal were found under all 3 high-rises (weeks later).
Over a hundred Firefighters and witnesses reported explosions and flashes. This was ignored by the 9/11 Commission Report — which allegedly barred 503 first responder statements. William Rodriguez experienced explosions in the basement, and the late Barry Jennings, Deputy Director of the Emergency Services Department for the New York City Housing Authority, described an explosion in Building 7. The floors impacted by the plane and the resulting fires, were also the very floors that had upgraded fireproofing done in 2000 and 2001.
There was a spike in trading in ‘put options’ before 9/11. The Bloomberg News reported that put options on the airlines (United and American Airlines) surged to the phenomenal high of over 250 times their average. Susan Lindauer wrote that her CIA handler, Richard Fuisz, was aware of the hijacking plot, and warned her off going to New York.
There were WAR GAMES going on that morning, and Dick Cheney was in command of NORAD that day. These drills only became publicly known later: OPERATION NORTHERN VIGILANCE – jet fighters sent to Alaska and Canada; BIOWARFARE EXERCISE TRIPOD II (Rudolph Giuliani in his testimony to the 9/11 Commission); OPERATION VIGILANT GUARDIAN – simulating hijacked planes, plus two other exercises. Note that matching drills also happened during the London 7/7 bombings.
On the morning of 9-11 there was an air defense stand-down resulting in no air response for the most fortified building in the world, the Pentagon — even though Andrews Air Force Base is 10 miles away. The Pentagon was hit 1 hour and 20 minutes after the attacks began, and Norman Mineta (Secretary of Transport) testified that Vice President Dick Cheney gave orders to “stand-down” on an incoming plane.
Although The Pentagon has hundreds of security cameras, no more than a few frames were released. The “plane” penetrated the newly renovated side, taking out the computers and killing many of the budget analysts investigating the missing $2.3 Trillion dollars which Donald Rumsfeld had announced the day before — on the 10th of September.
Of the 20,000 bone fragments recovered, over 750 (most 1/8 inch) were found on top of the 40-storey Deutsche Bank building, 300 feet from the South Tower. The people in the buildings were not crushed — they were turned into dust.
There are so many: Lieutenant-Colonel Anthony Shaffer and the Pentagon project, code-named Able Danger; the five (“Dancing”) Israeli citizens that later stated on TV, that they “were there to document the event”; Building 5 and 6 were just hollowed out; and what about the missing gold.
But considering Mr Frydenberg is now Australia’s Treasurer, we’ll discuss the financial heist that day.
Financial Info For the New Treasurer
The extracts from letter below was written by Fred Burks, who served as an interpreter in the Indonesian language for Presidents G W Bush and Bill Clinton, Vice Presidents Al Gore and Dick Cheney, Secretaries of State Colin Powell and Madeline Albright. He resigned from the US State Department in 2004. Burk’s letter was published at the American Herald Tribune on 8 July, 2018):
“Dear Mr President, [In Australia, replace with Josh Frydenberg]
There is strong evidence that 9/11 was used to facilitate a great financial crime – the laundering of $240 billion in covert securities.
The points below related to this crime are expanded upon in a 59-page white paper by E. P. Heidner, replete with endnotes, titled “Collateral Damage: U.S. Covert Operations and the Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001.” I’ve made a ten-page online summary of this important document, which I titled, “The 9/11 Attacks and the Black Eagle Trust Fund.”
The verifiable evidence in this document strongly suggests that 9/11 was used to as a cover-up for financial crimes being investigated by the Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI), whose offices in the Pentagon were destroyed on September 11th. The attacks were intended, at least in part, to cover-up the clearing of $240 billion dollars in securities covertly created in September 1991 to fund a covert economic war against Russia and the Soviet Union, during which ‘unknown’ western investors bought up much of the Soviet industry, with a focus on oil and gas.
On that fateful day, the Securities and Exchange Commission declared a national emergency, and for the first time in U.S. history, invoked its emergency powers under Securities Exchange Act Section 12(k) easing regulatory restrictions for clearing and settling security trades for the next 15 days. These changes would allow an estimated $240 billion in covert government securities to be cleared upon maturity without the standard regulatory controls around identification of ownership.
Evidence suggests the 9/11 attacks also served to derail multiple Federal investigations of crimes associated with this covert operation. Hundreds of billions of dollars of government securities had to be destroyed. A critical mass of brokers from the major government security brokerages in the Twin Towers had to be eliminated to create chaos in the government securities market. A situation needed to be created wherein $240 billion dollars of covert securities could be electronically “cleared” without anyone asking questions – which happened when the Federal Reserve declared an emergency and invoked its “emergency powers” that very afternoon.
Please read or at least skim the 10-page summary on this vital information, which can be verified using the links provided. As you seek to Make America Great Again, I believe that this aspect of 9/11 will be most helpful to you. We are hoping any remarks you make on September 11th this year might reference this information and lead all Americans toward understanding the deeper truths about 9/11 that have been concealed from the larger public.
Fred Burks”
[End of letter.]
Putting any sort of rational argument before anyone who puts personal gain/comfort before the truth is like putting pearls before swine.
Berry, I agree. Then there are the people that are so brain-dead that they can’t see what is in front of their faces. (just look at the picture of the tower with the cement and steel beams flying up and out from the exploding tower – they can’t see it!) Collapse my arse, things fall DOWN when they collapse, not UP!
Wasting a rational argument on irrational people. Or, as my Grandpappy used to say “Don’t engage in a battle of wits unless you know your opponent is armed”.
It boggles the mind that they are unable to “see” the MASSIVE MUSHROOM cloud that is at least 700 feet in diameter. If I remember the building was 207 feet across.(Caused by mini-nukes)
Can I assume you have some evidence of these mini-nukes? I ask this since adding nuclear weapons to the mix doesn’t help the narrative one bit. It “kookifies” the conspiracy narrative, weakens it, and makes it all the easier to dismiss out-of-hand. It hurts, rather than helps the truth movement. Same with the “planes” in scare-quotes. There were planes, and thousands of eyewitnesses to those planes all over NYC and Washington DC.
Buildings can be brought down with far less. It also self-contradicts. No need to use thermite compounds if nukes are available. There is conclusive evidence of thermite, which, again, with a bit of HE, (much less than most people would expect) is plenty for a concrete-and-steel building.
Where is the evidence of nukes? Virtually all explosions make mushroom-shaped clouds, even small ones. It’s the natural shape of a cloud of heated air and debris dispersing in ambient air. Even mini-nukes release massive amounts of long-half-life isotopes. The bottom of Manhattan should still be hot with prompt fallout residue. It should certainly have been hot in the days immediately following the event, and there are plenty of people with geiger-counters in NYC. I’ve met some of them.
Mini-nukes and fake planes, unless hard evidence exists for them, is bad juju for the 911 truth movement. What compels you to add the these dead-ends into an already rich tapestry of leads to track down which more than prove it was perpetrated not by those the official story blames?
mini nukes would explain the fact that for ~100 days after the event.. there was still fires burning beneath “ground zero” .. http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/rubblefires.html ( a term often used for the point of a nuclear detonation by the way – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ground_zero – they love rubbing our noses in their shit ) – you dont get that sort of heat from office combustibles and or friction…
fact is.. to this day, the crime has never been investigated by the authorities.. imagine that?! a crime significant enough to drag the world into a never ending war of terror, doesnt even warrant investigation..
where is the evidence for any part of the official account? there is none..
there is hard evidence that proves the official account to be an impossible conspiracy theory.
https://www.ae911truth.org/
Fair Dinkum Large quantities of thermite having been burned during the building demolition would explain it much better!
The problem with nukes, is that even the smallest ones for which information is published are the equivalent of 10-75 tons of TNT. This kind of explosion, in physical contact with the building material would have basically atomized a large part of the building instantly, but that’s not what the videos show. Such an explosion would have thrown large pieces of building material sideways for miles, instead of hundreds of feet.
In other words, you can’t make a nuke small enough not to be bloody obvious.
The footage shows a violent collapse, but not a nuclear detonation.
Look at some vids of nukes set off underground. Notice an obvious blast wave travelling out from the center of the underground explosion. You can’t hide such a thing. You especially can’t hide such a thing if it’s inside, or under a 1300 foot building. Another thing you can’t hide are fission products.
First-responders fighting the underground molten-steel (nuclear, not thermite) fires would have died in days or weeks, of radiation sickness, rather than a few of them dying of other conditions after a few years, as they have. Those other conditions are very likely to be related to asbestos or other by-products of the building demolition. You can’t melt a hundred tons of steel with a nuclear weapon without making any radioactive by-products, since it would violate the laws of physics.
But I agree with you. It stuns me that there has never been even the slightest curiosity by authorities to investigate the myriad loose ends.
Putting political pressure on them to do so involves sticking to evidence we’re absolutely sure of. Trying to tell them to investigate the thing and forcing the inclusion of holographic planes, particle beams, and/or mini-nukes into the conspiracy narrative will be 100% successful…at getting the person delivering the narrative laughed out of the room. That’s because there is no hard evidence supporting these “features” of the conspiracy narrative. Worse still, they don’t add any value to the very strong parts of the narrative which can be conclusively proven.
For the best chance of politically demanding an investigation, speculative narrative points (mini-nukes, virtual aircraft, missiles, particle-beams, etc) can be left out, since:
Truthers can’t cite any hard, publicly available evidence for their use, and
The means by which the buildings were demolished is secondary to who was involved in the demolitions (and it wasn’t the 19 hijackers). There were probably there, but their job was the Jerry Bruckheimer theatre piece, which did nothing to bring down the building.
Mini-nukes aren’t required to involve the military-industrial-complex. They are already inextricably woven into the conspiracy narrative, since they had to be complicit in the stand-down, etc.
In fact, many folks including the likes of Mike Rivero and several other truthers, including AE911Truth strongly believe that any 911 truther pushing this (mini-nukes, no planes, particle-beams) narrative is most-likely a Cass Sunstein “congnitive infiltration” shill.
Speculative elements of the conspiracy narrative don’t add any value, in fact, they weaken the argument in favor of actual criminal investigation, which is what we’re after. What REALLY subtracts from the narrative are speculations involving mechanisms that cannot be proven to already exist (i.e. non-radioactive non flux generating nukes with only a 5 ton yield)
We get angry when people move the goalposts in an argument. Including this sort of gadgetry is moving our goalposts in favor of the enemy’s argument!
I think we can all agree — we don’t not know the specifics of what explosives were used. What everyone does agree is that highly sophisticated explosive techniques were used to bring the buildings down — nothing we’ve quite seen before. It blew that building apart and turned much of it to dust.
Thanks for your response Joe.. sorry for my tardy response..
my limited understanding of all things explosive just makes me think lateral and upward ejections would suit nuclear more than thermite.. but – i can offer no qualified opinion either way, like people here say.. we just dont know. and given the lack of any real answers to legitimate questions.. of course.. people are going to theorise..
but we do know for fact.. the official account is lacking both plausibility and evidence.
in a functioning reality, that in itself would be enough for any fair minded media to be asking the hard questions.. seems only True Media like Gumshoe.. can handle the truth.
Joe, great comment. I was going to say something similar, but you saved me the effort with a much more eloquent comment.
Good point Joe. I don’t think it matters what was used. G5 tells us that he read/told (?) that they used variable yield mini-nukes (W40). I read it elsewhere too.
Now whether they used thermite, short life advanced explosives, traditional demo explosives would come out after an investigation (if there ever was one). Much of those buildings were VAPORIZED.
“planes” — refers to replaced planes. And the shanksville plane.
The pictures really tell it all really.
Joe, I never mind being “corrected”. I remember once in a past article years ago referring to planes… got a good serve from someone about drone replacements and the pentagon etc etc.
It just amazes me that all these years later — the most ludicrous fantastical story by the MSM is the one believed by the dupes in Canberra.
Thanks, Dee. I could very well be wrong, but if I were trying to get a heinous crime against me or mine investigated, for which I had slam-dunk evidence, the very last thing I would want to do is add ego-driven anecdotal, speculative evidence that the perps went out of their way to use a ludicrously expensive piece of possibly imaginary kit that would not actually have been required to perpetrate the crime as observed by the witnesses.
And you can bet the apologist side of the argument (media, neocons, politicians, etc) well know this, too. They would be quick to use it against me.
Basically, there are “fun” far-out narratives that complicate the 911 crime un-necessarily, and there are narratives that only use ironclad hard evidence.
Even if the “ironclad” narratives aren’t 100% accurate, at least they are supportable in court with tangible evidence and exhibits. Those are the ones that should be used as a sharp weapon to force accountability.
“Someone said [they] used XYZ to destroy the WTC, and others wrote about it” is not supportable in court. The judge will laugh, or worse.
There has been at least one high-profile jury trial absolutely wrecked by “kooky” testimony from a prosecution witness.
And they got away with it! What an incredible operation! The hutzpah of it all! And at so many levels! Simultaneously:
The excuse for Wesley Clark’s 7 country PNAC regime change
A cover up of huge pending financial investigations
A cover up of the trillions that Dov Zakheim swindled from the Pentagon announced on 8/11/01
A huge gold robbery
A collective trauma based mind control operation on the whole world
Other stuff that we don’t even know about
In a perverse way you have to admire their balls and organizational ability.
And before Wesley Clark – let’s not forget that on the VERY day of 9-11 as the events were unfolding we have Israel’s ex-Prime Minister Ehud Barak conveniently already in place in the BBC studios calling for –
pre-emptive strikes against “rogue states – there are five of them – Iran, Iraq, Libya, [one on the scripted list (?Syria) must have slipped his mind but – wait for it …] North Korea …”
https://youtu.be/GAueLjdKh1s?t=475
The reason why Gillard and Frydenberg oppose the 9/11 truth movement is that they are both Zionists. Gillard was an inaugural member of the Israel/Australia Leadership Forum and Josh is also a fanatical supporter of Israel; which country was clearly behind 9/11 in the first place.
“The reason why Gillard and Frydenberg oppose the 9/11 truth movement is that they are both Zionists.”
Tony, are you saying that if they weren’t Zionists they would not be opposing the 9-11 truth movement?
Anyway if they are traitors, let’s arrest them for treason. It is a common law crime.
Shame, shame on those two and all the others. Never mind getting Larry, Dick, etc. Get the Australians. Cover-up is a crime.
Where is Vanessa Goodwin when we need her?
Have a look at this article Tony:
https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2018/09/09/the-jewish-war-on-white-australia-colin-tatz-and-the-genocide-charge-part-four/
gillard is a shalom goy, I recommend looking up the term if unfamiliar. Elvis Presley is one and I think Ned Kelly but history is rich with examples.
Richard, the link you gave, and I want everything on the table, is disgusting to me. I know these things are believed in a lot of Australia. I’m not a lefty and I hate all government policy. As things are taken from you in the same way and you are demonised, you will see the lack of law, justice, and empathy. Don’t bring them home, this is their home. Those things that happen in remote communities, also happen frequently in the non-indigenous suburbs. Usually the lower working or unemployed areas, but is rife in all “walks of life”.
I accept you have a right to put it on the table, and I would be happy to converse on it. Its a very large subject.
I apologise in advance if I have wrongly assumed these are your views.
Simon
Without further comment – Trump on Flight 93
https://dailycaller.com/2018/09/11/trump-9-11-united-93/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=mixi&utm_campaign=dailycaller
Dee, the links in the above letter are great. I found one that says — which i had never heard before — that a German company, Convar, specializes in reviving damaged computers and that they obtained several hard drives from the rubble at WTC.
This is allegedly helping them investigate the said financial heist — such as huge shopping sprees on credit cards just before the towers fell.
But at the end of this article (on Want to Know website which looks decent to me) they say Convar is under contract to the Defense Dept to do this investigating.
https://www.wanttoknow.info/011218reuters
To state that 3 thousand innocent individuals sacrificed and murdered is somewhat ironic when one considers the one cent and others who collaborate with this sect are involved with murder every day in wars, subversive activity and general criminal activity is but a small proportion of those who are all part of the statististics of business as usual.
If the financial cult came from a historical circumstance of some centuries ago of the establishment who found those who dealt with usury as low class outsiders to decency and deemed of a higher calling, are now victims of this group active upon revenge now in a position of power can and will use money to corrupt those who through history looked down upon those whose profession is or was usury now able to create the blood bath that seems entrenched with no end in sight, and has no mercy on those guilty or innocent, are all meat for the grinder.
Laurent Louis, a great man. At 3 minutes he says “The Parliament hides away, it is afraid of citizens.”
This question keeps coming back to me “how evil are ALL these Zionists?” They snuff out about 3,000 lives on the day, kill many more after the event and steal great masses of wealth from the taxpayer (via the government, not their government as these are mostly dual citizens we are talking about). Then they carry out a massive propaganda exercise to try and cover their tracks. Silverstein incriminates himself on video and then is paid out (twice) for probably the biggest insurance con the World has known.
And Americans will not admit that their Constitution has been torn up and that Israel governs the US. Mind you Australia is not far behind.
I personally believe that Joshua Frydenberg is a Zionist agent within our parliament. Why else in his maiden speech would he bring up the 9/11 subject which has nothing to do with Australian politics and then have the audacity to tell the Australian Prime Minister how to deal with the Australian unionist who has views (on the 9/11 subject) in line with the thinking of many non brainwashed Australians.
I presume they were waiting for the day to slander those questioning the official story — by all sides of the fake parliament. Kevin Braken caught their eye, and they rolled into gear with Jon faine et al… to discredit all.
Please see 911tv.org That is the website that live-streamed my Watertown lecture. They mostly deal with 9-11.
But it is not just a website. It is a storage place for films of exactly 28 minutes length, or 58 minutes, packaged in a way that Community Broadcasters welcome. No money changes hands.
Hummux, the web host, says you may be surprised if your send any of his films to public stations — they may indeed broadcast it. He has had a lot of success (After all, stations need stuff to use!!)
I quote Hummux:
“Phone your local public TV station and ask them to broadcast this film to your local community. Your station can download the film in TV broadcast format from PEGMedia.org
This film is available for any Public TV station in the country – and world – to broadcast.
Stations that use Telvue, DVDs or other media can contact 911TV1@gmail.com for instructions.”
Here is Hummux’s offering for today, re the psychology of 9-11:
http://911tv.blogspot.com/2018/09/charles-ewing-smith-2016-demolition-of_4.html
Mal, what is “Israel”?
For that matter, what is “Australia”?
(Extremely hard questions — feel free to ignore….)
Dee, what is “South Africa”? It has changed hands several times. Is each set of hands “South Africa” while it holds power? If so, then we are not defining a country but a band of merry men.
If you wish to discuss, contact me at Shady Pines, the place people go when they are gobsmacked to learn that their country is not a country.
(I am referring to the comments under yesterday’s Holsworthy article.)
Laurent Louis, what a brave man! What a load of trash are those that walked out of the session and then had the audacity to straggle back in after his presentation. These were supposed to be “the people’s representatives”. Yeah!
Is this one part of the reasoning for our Treasurer’s stupidity and incompetence or is he as smart as the Liberals government thinks he is?
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/fiveisraelis.html
Church Bishops not reporting disgusting criminal paedophiles are Santa’s, compared to those protecting and covering for mass murderers and killer warmongers destroying thousands of children, their parents and lives.
Who would bear a minute behind their fence in Canberra, in the presence of any of those cowardly and STUPID bastards.
TREASURER FRYDENBERG: ‘Document’ this;
https://www.bing.com/search?q=israels+there+to+document+the+event&form=EDGTCT&qs=PF&cvid=8e42c92317ba4ee997eff52dc7786056&refig=0f05d0d3225e4cada39a30eee75ade81&cc=AU&setlang=en-US
So they dance and do high fives whilst innocent citizens fell to their deaths etc. Must have been a great and enjoyable show. Wonder how many Australians would also have enjoyed ‘….the event’.
Frydenburg is a “Sayanim”
“Agents differ from assets and sayanim. Agents possess the requisite mental state to be convicted of treason, a capital crime. […] Sayanim (singular sayan) are shielded from conventional legal culpability by being told only enough to perform their narrow role. […] In other words, a sayan can operate as an accomplice but still not be legally liable due to a lack of the requisite intent regarding the broader goals—of which they are purposely kept ignorant. […] When not aiding an ongoing operation, sayanim gather and report intelligence useful to Israel.”
As for Gillard et al, they’re just in it for the money and kudos.
Hang them all.(after appropriate and proper adjudication, of course)
I suppose one can only conclude that such people are anti-Australian.
AMAZINGLY ALL HIS BUDDIES HAVE DIED IN THE TOWERS — AND HE DOESN’T EVEN MENTION THEM, OR THAT HE HAD AN OFFICE IN THE NORTH TOWER.
I remember I once read he had two offices… one with Marsh & McLennan, and another in the South Tower for his Terror consulting. Both got zapped. But he doesn’t even mention it. He’s only there to tell us that Osama B L did it.
I figured out that 9-11 was a psy-op in the first week. I got on a forum where people were discussing the Pentagon attack. One of the pictures that was available was of the port side (left side) engine which had failed to penetrate the wall.
Several power plant and air frame mechanics identified the engine as a JT8D engine. When they tried to find maintenance manuals and other sources regarding the JT8D, they found that everything had been ‘scrubbed’ from the internet. Thankfully, one fellow knew of an engine that was in an aircraft museum in the mid-west (I forget where it was, Ohio??). He took a picture of it and it matched the engine from the crash site.
As soon as it was confirmed as a JT8D engine, there was a disinformation campaign that the plane that hit the Pentagon was a ‘Skyhawk’ fighter painted up with American Airline colors (the
Skyhawk also used the JT8D engine). Nobody was buying the disinfo.
The aircraft that hit the Pentagon was a 737-200. It is a ‘stretched’ 737 and used JT8D engines.
If you look at the pictures of the Pentagon you can see where the fireball from the wing tanks rolled up the front of the building and deposited black on the building.
The length of the scarring on the front of the Pentagon from the impact is consistent with the wingspan of the 737. The 757 is much wider and doesn’t match.
The final descending turn of the aircraft is outside the flight envelope of the 757, however it is within the flight envelope of the 737-200.
The 737-200 was chosen for the attack as the longer thinner engines of the 737-200 allowed more ground clearance for the final run into the Pentagon.
When aircraft hit ‘vertical’ there is very little left of the aircraft, especially light structures such as wings, they fragment into little pieces. Flying into a brick will is essentially a ‘vertical’ impact. Inside the Pentagon were larger pieces such as the other engine and landing gear.
There are multiple witness statements of a twin engine commercial aircraft crashing into the Pentagon. The ‘missile at the Pentagon’ is disinformation meant to discredit people searching for the truth.
If the many videos from cameras located around the Pentagon were released it would quickly resolve any doubt about the aircraft that hit the Pentagon – don’t expect the Government to ever release them.
Terry,
it has been many years since 2004 when I awakened and researched.
I am a bit lazy now.
Can you remind me please of any theories relating to the alleged passengers aboard the reported ‘757’ . If it was alleged that the 757 carrying the passengers hit the Pentagon and it did not, where are the reported passengers.
I recall that the solicitor General’s wife was supposed to be a passenger and rang him, according to the solicitor General and that is where the box cutter crap originated. But in the Mouseau (the underpants patsy) trial the FBI said there was no connection recorded on the alleged phone call.
As for the Pentagon security camera recordings not being divulged, (except for the 5 ** frames from the car park showing little) it must be clear to the dumbest official 911 government conspiracy theorist (including you two; Fridenberg [our Treasurer] and Faine [of.our. one billion/a ABC]) that failure to disclose the videos simply suggests that the killers do not want the public to be able to question the Pentagon mass murders.
++ I might add that a video did turn up later allegedly from a garage that was claimed by many to show a missile hitting the Pentagon.
Anyway, the Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI) was conveniently wiped out with all their bean counters with records investigating into the 2,3 trillion or so reported as missing by Rumsfield on the 10th September 2001.
Just fancy! Bin Laden was a Godsend for the US thieves and protected them.
A summary put simply for those who are still gullible official government conspiracy theorists who still believe the government nonsense and who are, consciously or not, protecting and covering for mass murderers and war mongers responsible for 17 years of more killing in the Middle East.
https://www.corbettreport.com/911-a-conspiracy-theory/
Good one idiots!! explain that to the families of millions killed over the last 17 years in the Middle East. Add the naby now dying of cancer from the effects of the asbestos spread across New York whilst ‘Lucky Larry; the leaseholder of the towers from July 2001 gets a few billion from the insurance companies and we pay the premiums.
Need I mention Luckys building number 7 the ‘..we decided to pull it’.. ..’and watched it go down..”
Seriously mass media and shock jokes, it is being kind to describe you lot as incompetent ignorant brainless gullible stupid wombats. NEVER SERVE ON A CRIMINAL TRIAL JURY: YOU DO NOT HAVE THE OBJECTIVE AND INTELLECTUAL CAPACITY TO DO SO.
My apologies to wombats.
“If it was alleged that the 757 carrying the passengers hit the Pentagon and it did not, where are the reported passengers.”
Bugger if I know – I also don’t know where their luggage is either. I suppose just about any ‘theory’ could be proposed to the disposal of the passengers. The fact remains that there is substantial OBJECTIVE evidence to indicate that it was a 737-200 that hit the Pentagon. Thus, the official story is bunk as is the ‘missile’ at the Pentagon.
Where the passengers ended up is about as relevant as to the type of explosives that brought down the towers. People can go around and around in circles debating what kind of explosives were used, but once it is accepted that explosives brought down the towers, the government’s narrative collapses.
Yes and all the government humpty dumpties will have a great fall.
wikispooks9-11.com?israel/did/it