Home Boston Comparing Jury Instructions for Tsarnaev with Those in a Vermont Case

Comparing Jury Instructions for Tsarnaev with Those in a Vermont Case

45

Men in Alabama waiting to lynch the Scottsboro boys in 1932; Mary Maxwell in Boston in 2022Men in Alabama waiting to lynch the Scottsboro boys in 1932;  Mary Maxwell in Boston in 2022

by Mary W Maxwell, LLB

Just a thought — why isn’t the Woke Set focusing on the fact that a jury in Boston, in 2013, condemned a Chechnyan boy to death without a fair trial?  Think back to the trial of the Scottsboro boys — eight Negroes tried for raping two white women (did not happen), while a band outside the courthouse played “Hail, hail the gang’s all here.” What’s the diff?

By chance today, I came across a set of jury instructions in a 1992 Vermont case. I was so surprised at how thoroughly the judge gave the jurors careful definitions of the crimes, and explained to them what they should do. I’ll print it below as I think every layperson, including me, can learn a lot from it about assault, circumstantial evidence, and presumption of innocence.

These days I am certainly not reflecting on the Marathon scandal, as we are in a genocide. But even if there were no genocide, I can’t do anything for Jahar Tsarnaev except natter on. The US Supreme Court reinstated his Death Penalty.  I believe he has another shot at appeals based on “ineffective counsel” — as we know, his counsel could win Olympic gold for Ineffectiveness. But to get to the court, you have to apply to Mr and Mrs Ineffective.

I’ll bet Kafka neve thought of that one.

Instructions to the Jurors in US v Tsarnaev, in 2013

For now, in case any solicitor listening wants to help, I will recount the problem of the juror instructions as given by US District Court George A O’Toole, Jr.  The custom is for the prosecutor to suggest some words to be put to the jury, and his/her suggestions then go to the Defender who may agree with them or alter them.  The judge is under no obligation to use the suggested words of either side.

Here is what the prosecutor, Carmen Otriz, in February 2013,  recommended as the last few words for jurors. (It’s perfectly kosher.):

“The indictment charges the defendant with multiple counts of possession and use of a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence, and it alleges in some of those counts that the crimes resulted in the deaths of Krystle Marie Campbell, Officer Sean Collier, Lingzi Lu, and Martin Richard. Finally, the indictment alleges that the defendant carjacked and robbed an individual who has the initials D.M. The defendant has pleaded not guilty to all of the charges.” [Bolding added by Mary Maxwell]

Then the defense attorney Judy Clarke offered a correction to that Jury Instruction. In Motion 1101-1 on March 2, 2015, we see that she wrote an ending exactly as follows:

“Finally, the indictment alleges that the defendant carjacked and robbed an individual who has the initials D.M. The defendant is presumed innocent of all charges, and the Government bears the burden of proving each and every element of the charges beyond a reasonable doubt.

Yes, she crossed it out. And yes, the Judge obeyed her. Very likely the jurors went to their deliberation room thinking Jahar had pleaded guilty. After all, they had heard Judy Clarke say, in her opening statement: “It was him.”  I’m not kidding. She said that.

And the Great Nine would have seen in the file that I wrote to the Appeals judge, Cheif Judge  Juan Torruella, to tell him that SCOTUS had ruled in McCoy v Louisiana that a defender must not indicate guilt against the wish of an accused to plead not guilty. Note: Judge Torruella died On October 26, 2020, in Puerto Rico.

For the rest of this article, I offer the Vermont judge’s veritable Master Class on responsible jury behavior.

JURY INSTRUCTIONS, at a 1992 Trial in the State of Vermont

     AGGRAVATED ASSAULT WITH LESSER INCLUDED SIMPLE ASSAULT

INSTRUCTIONS TO BE CONSIDERED AS A WHOLE
You have all heard the evidence.  You are all to consider the instructions as a whole and are to regard each instruction together with the others given to you.  Do not single out any certain sentence or any individual point or instruction and
ignore the others.

INFORMATION OR INDICTMENT – CHARGE
This is a criminal case brought by the State of Vermont against                            .  The case was started when an information was filed which charged the defendant with
violating a state law.  The information charges:

INFORMATION NOT EVIDENCE
The defendant has entered a plea of not guilty.  The burden rests upon the State to prove to each of you, beyond a reasonable doubt, every essential element of the offense charged.  I will explain the elements of the offense and define reasonable doubt
in a moment.

The charge which has been filed is the formal method of bringing the defendant to trial.  The fact that a charge has been filed is NOT to be considered by you as any evidence of guilt.

PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE
The presumption of innocence remains with the defendant unless and until the jury reaches a verdict of guilty.  This presumption of innocence is evidence you may consider in favor of the accused in arriving at your verdict.  This presumption presents sufficient reason to find                          not guilty.  The defendant is not required to present any evidence to prove his innocence.

To overcome this presumption of innocence, the State must prove the defendant guilty of each essential element of the crime charged beyond a reasonable doubt.

REASONABLE DOUBT
A reasonable doubt is a doubt based on reason.  Reasonable doubt may be created by the evidence presented or it may arise from the lack of evidence.  State v. Cohen, 2 Vt. L. Wk. 303 (1991); State v. McMahon, No. 90-464, Entry Order (Vt. Jan. 8, 1992).

ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS
As you are aware, the defendant is charged with aggravated assault.  However, there is a lesser included offense called simple assault that you must consider.  For both offenses, I will now instruct you on the separate essential elements which the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt.  If the State fails to convince you beyond a reasonable doubt as to any one element, then you must find the defendant not guilty of the offense of
which that element is a part.

For you to find the defendant guilty of aggravated assault, the state must have proved beyond a reasonable doubt, the existence of the following essential elements:

  1. the defendant,                           , caused serious bodily injury to another;
  1. the defendant did so under circumstances manifesting an extreme indifference to the value of human life; and
  1. the defendant acted recklessly under such circumstances and it resulted in the bodily injury.

The words used by the legislature to define the elements of the crime carry their common and ordinary meaning.  Some terms have distinct legal definitions.  The following definitions may help you in understanding the meaning of the words used.

“SERIOUS BODILY INJURY” is defined as bodily injury which creates a substantial risk of death or which causes serious, permanent disfigurement, or protracted loss or impairment of the function of any bodily member or organ.  13 V.S.A. 1021(2).  [I will now read the stipulation filed by the parties in this case with regard to serious bodily injury:]

The defendant and the State agree that for purposes of this trial, Michael Fitzgerald suffered “serious bodily injury” as that term is defined by Vermont Statute, as
a result of a wound which he received to his head on June 14, 1991.  Therefore, you may find that the element of serious bodily injury is established beyond a reasonable doubt, even if the parties do not present
evidence on that element.

“CIRCUMSTANCES MANIFESTING AN EXTREME INDIFFERENCE TO THE VALUE
OF HUMAN LIFE” are those events surrounding the imposition of serious bodily injury which demonstrate a blatant disregard for the victim’s life.  State v. Joseph, 2 Vt. L. Wk. 409, 410 (1991); State v. Saucier, 512 A.2d 1120, 1125 (N.H. 1986).

“RECKLESSLY” means a conscience disregard of a substantial and unjustifiable risk.  The risk, in this case of serious bodily injury, must be of such a nature and degree that, considering the nature and purpose of the defendant’s conduct and the circumstances known to him, its disregard is a gross deviation from the standard of conduct a law abiding citizen would have observed in the actor’s situation.  Black’s Law Dictionary, 1142
(5th ed. 1979)(citing Model Penal Code 2.02)

The defendant claims his gun discharged accidentally.  That is a question of fact for you to decide but as I’ve told you, the burden of proof rests upon the state to prove each element beyond a reasonable doubt.

For you to find the defendant guilty of simple assault, the lesser included offense, the state must have proved beyond a reasonable doubt, the existence of the following essential elements:

  1. the defendant caused bodily injury to another; and
  2.   the defendant acted recklessly.

“BODILY INJURY” is defined as physical pain, illness or any impairment of physical condition.  13 V.S.A. 1021(1).  Serious bodily injury, which the parties agree was suffered by , includes the definition for bodily injury.

Id. 1021(2); Blakeney, supra, at 500.  Therefore, if you conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that the victim suffered a serious bodily injury then he suffered a bodily injury.
As already defined, “RECKLESSLY” means a conscience disregard for a substantial and unjustifiable risk.  The risk, in this case of bodily injury, must be of such a nature and degree that, considering the nature and purpose of the defendant’s conduct and
the circumstances known to him, its disregard is a gross deviation from the standard of conduct a law abiding citizen would have observed in the actor’s situation.  Black’s Law
Dictionary, 1142 (5th ed. 1979)(citing Model Penal Code 2.02)

The state must prove every essential element of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt.  If the state fails to prove any element of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt, you must find the defendant not guilty of the offense for which the unproven
element is essential.

PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE BETWEEN DEGREES
I will now guide you as to how you should consider the essential elements in each offense in this case. It would be improper for me to control the manner of your deliberations to
the point of mandating a set order by which you must consider the evidence.  However, the presumption of innocence applies to each offense and requires you to search for every mitigating circumstance which may result in the lowest degree of guilt consistent with the facts and evidence as you find them.  State

  1. Duff, 150 Vt. 329 (1988). Therefore, the court suggests you consider the issues in this case in the following manner.

First, decide if the defendant committed a simple assault. That is, did                   cause bodily injury while acting recklessly.  If after considering the evidence as you find it and the presumption of innocence, you have a reasonable doubt as to any element of that offense you must find the defendant not guilty of all offenses and you need go no further in your deliberations.  If after considering the evidence
as you find it and the presumption of innocence, you are convinced of each essential element of simple assault beyond a reasonable doubt, then consider whether the defendant committed aggravated assault.

That is, did                                cause serious bodily injury while acting recklessly under circumstances manifesting extreme indifference to the value of human life.  If after considering the evidence as you find it and the presumption of innocence, you have a reasonable doubt as to any element of that offense, you must find the defendant guilty only of simple assault and not guilty of aggravated assault.  If after considering the evidence as you find it and the presumption of innocence, you are convinced of each element of aggravated assault beyond a reasonable doubt, then you must find the
defendant guilty of aggravated assault.

You may find the defendant not guilty of all offenses; in which case your verdict would be not guilty.  You may find the defendant guilty of simple assault and not guilty of aggravated assault; in which case your verdict would be guilty of simple assault and not guilty of aggravated assault.  You may find the defendant guilty of simple assault and guilty of aggravated assault; in which case your verdict would be guilty of aggravated
assault.  You may not find the defendant not guilty of simple assault and guilty of aggravated assault.  Once again, your three choices for a verdict in this case are not guilty of any offense; guilty of simple assault and not guilty of aggravated assault; or guilty of aggravated assault.  Of course, to find the defendant guilty of any offense the state must have proven the essential elements of that offense beyond a reasonable doubt.

GENERAL GUIDES TO DELIBERATIONS
Now allow me to provide some general guidelines to assist you in your deliberations.

CREDIBILITY OF WITNESSES / WEIGHING EVIDENCE
You are the sole judges of the evidence.  The credibility of the witnesses and of the weight to be given to the testimony of each of them is up to you.  In considering the testimony of any witness, you may take into account his or her ability and opportunity to observe; the manner and conduct of the witness while testifying; any interest, bias or prejudice the witness may have; and the reasonableness of the testimony of the witness considered in the light of all the evidence in the case.

You may assume that each witness told the truth.  You should not disregard the testimony of any witness without a reason and without careful consideration.  If you find conflicting
testimony, you must determine which of the witnesses you will believe and which of them you will disbelieve.  You may believe all, some or none of the testimony of a witness.

In weighing the testimony to determine what or whom you will believe, you should use your own knowledge, experience and common sense gained from day to day living.  The number of witnesses who testify to a particular fact, or the quantity of evidence on a
particular point need not control your determination of the truth.  You should give the greatest weight to that evidence which convinces you most strongly of its truthfulness.

TYPES OF EVIDENCE
“DIRECT EVIDENCE” means evidence that directly proves a fact, without the need for an inference and which if true, conclusively establishes that fact.

“CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE” means evidence that proves a fact from which an inference of the existence of another fact may be drawn.

An “INFERENCE” is a deduction of fact that may logically and reasonably be drawn from another fact or groups of facts. It is not necessary that facts be proven by direct evidence. Both direct and circumstantial evidence are acceptable as a means of proof.  Neither is entitled to greater weight than the other.

EVIDENCE OF FLIGHT BY DEFENDANT
There has been evidence introduced in this case tending to show that the defendant fled from the scene of the incident.  if you find that he did this, it does not raise any presumption of guilt.  It has limited probative value because there are many reasons for such conduct which are consistent with being not guilty; including fear, ignorance, and confusion.  But you are entitled to consider these facts if you find such to be the case
as tending to show a consciousness of guilt on the defendant’s part.  In weighing any evidence of flight, along with all the other evidence as you find it, you are entitled to give it such weight as you think it deserves.  State v. Unwin, 139 Vt. 186 (1980); State v. Giroux, 151 Vt. 361 (1989)

RULINGS OF COURT
During the progress of trial, certain questions may have been asked of some witnesses and certain exhibits may have been offered which the court ruled were not admissible into evidence. You must not concern yourselves with the reasons for the rulings since the production of evidence is strictly controlled by rules of law.

You must not consider an exhibit or testimony which the court ordered stricken from the record.  In fact, such matter is to be treated as though you never heard or saw it.
Nothing that I said or did during the trial is intended as any suggestion of which facts you should find or what verdict you should reach.  Each of you, as jurors, must determine the facts and reach a verdict.

STATEMENTS BY COUNSEL
The statements or comments of counsel for either the state or the defense should not be considered as evidence in this case.  It is your duty to determine the facts from the testimony and evidence admitted by the court and given in your presence. You should disregard any and all information that you may have derived from any other source.

SYMPATHY – PREJUDICE
Neither sympathy nor prejudice for or against the state, the defendant or any witness or victim involved with this case should be allowed to influence you in any manner in reaching your verdict.

JURY DELIBERATIONS
Your verdict must represent the considered judgment of each juror.  In order to return a verdict of guilt or innocence you must all agree.  Your verdict must be unanimous.

When you have reached a verdict, inform the court officer that you have reached a verdict.  Do not tell the officer what the verdict is.  You will then be brought into the courtroom where the court will ask you if you have reached a verdict and what that verdict is.

If the state failed to prove each essential element beyond a reasonable doubt, you must find the defendant not guilty. If the state did prove each essential element beyond a
reasonable doubt, you must find the defendant guilty.

SHARE

45 COMMENTS

  2. During the night, while you Aussies were huddled around the campfire watching the Elbow Election News, a “trending” item appeared at Gumshoe. I clicked on it and something in it led me to also click on the following article about the Marathon.

    It does a fair job of summarizing what can be done now, even at this late stage (the Marathon bombing was nine years ago):

    https://gumshoenews.com/solving-marathon-bomb-mystery-part-10-right-time-split-brains/

  3. Photo credit: the picture of me was snapped by my pal Michelle Roderick, last week (May 4th).

    I had placed myself near the Park St red-line subway station, at the 5pm rush hour in Boston. My intention was to catch the crowd coming up from Summer St and the crowd coming down from City Hall.

    Only two women approached me to ask about Jahar and Tamerlan. Others did not even glance my way. Ah, this must be because a person holding a sign is probably a beggar, and who wants to deal with that on one’s way home?

    I twigged when a kindly man came up to me and said “Go to the red door at the church; they are serving hot meals.”

  4. Mary , thank you , what a great article. They are certainly very clear and precise instructions.
    And yes !!! Australia has mysteriously changed government. It was very similar to the Biden slam dunk.
    Albosleazy did everything wrong ( just like Joe ) , however the sheep couldn’t resist one of thier own.
    My personal opinion , it was rigged , by higher authority.

    • That higher authority is no doubt laughing in scorn, especially at those who think that they can change the climate by their own will.

  5. A recent Max Igun video. The opening with that parasite in NZ makes you wonder what has happened to the IQ level in NZ. He gets into the alleged fraud of the Australian elections. I say ‘alleged’ as I don’t know if it was a fraudulent election or just plain stoopid people that were given pencils to play with.

    https://www.bitchute.com/video/d4JPhFr2Nfkh/

    • Last summer was the shortest ever and the TV keeps telling us global warming is out of control and the sea level will be around our knees in 2050. Well it keeps the price of beachfront land down for developers and super rich. Where I was they were very good at putting the numbers clearly in the boxes, so many voted for Globalist Teal, the advertising was done by the news. Globalist Greens preferences as well as Globalist ALP preferences mostly went to Teal, whose other plank is to fight corruption. I guess that would be done with a Ministry of Truth.
      So now Elbow is going to make us the sustainable energy capital of the world. The defeated government oversaw the greatest takeup of solar panels ever, and commissioned Snowy Hydro 2.0, I guess Elbow will be buying batteries from presumed Globalist Elon Musk.

      • “Last summer was the shortest ever and the TV keeps telling us global warming is out of control” – not only was it the shortest I’ve experienced, but not one day ever got over 30C where I live. Heck, I may have to decommission my air conditioner.

      • I should add that the 2-party preferred preference system where I was looking on only included the two parties with the most primary votes. You could therefore quite easily have a situation where for example Red got 26%, Blue got 25%, Green got 24% and Yellow got 23% (2% informal). It may be that everybody voting Red, Blue, Green put Yellow 2nd, in other words well preferred by everybody, but they would be excluded from 2-party preferred vote count.
        Hence, AEC uniforms are all purple, because they deliver a red or blue outcome.

        The other thing I noticed is that you were allowed to leave the last square blank, in other words if you had 10 lower house candidates, you only had to demonstrate the intent of your sequence up to 9, if that was clear, your vote was valid.

  7. Now we have to think of how far the globalist control freaks have advanced their agenda. They do not give up.
    The teal brigade are their useful village idiots to manipulate government policies.
    My conversations with the teal acolytes merely suggests that they have no clue. (Ask anyone of the about building #seven) .
    In twenty years the msm has conditioned a new crew to promote the globalist lying msm agenda.
    Previously we had two parties controlled by the globalists.
    Now the globalists have inserted a third lot of uninformed.
    Brilliant. Now the globalist have inserted a i‘third column’ into play and the third column, is designed to cause havoc and dissension to cover for the globalist agenda by dividing society with more BS.
    People can not see the historic game, divide, cause mayhem and then impose their globalist resolution; totalitarian control. That is the nexus with:
    YOU OBEY.
    The Teals will wake up with Klaus Schrub, who they have never heard of when I asked the fools.
    Who PROCLAIMED:
    ‘YOU WILL OWN NOTHING AND BE HAPPY’.
    From what I observed from the Teal spivs,
    No way are they going to have nothing. and ‘BE HAPPY’.
    Idiots💁

    • Just heard Elbow said in his victory speech “blah blah common purpose blah blah” – I think Common Purpose was a Globalist slogan coming after Build Back Better

      • Time will tell.

        The “Wolf lady” in action with Andris Nelson. Helen says “I cannot live without this piece”.
        Hélène Grimaud – Brahms – Piano Concerto No.1 & 2 – Andris Nelsons – Wiener Philharmoniker (Trailer)

          • Mary, do our fingers start at the knuckles?

            In the 70ies, we used to go to Corsica for holidays (a quick car ride from central Switzerland down to Genoa or Livorno, then Car ferry across to Bastia – at the bottom of the s.c. finger!. Later on, my wife and I watched a super 8 recording from Corsica, where a man was trying to maneuver an odd looking structure in shallow waters, barely managing to stay on board. Off we went (now on Oz south coast) and bought two of these “beasts” and started this thing called windsurfing. This was how we came to get very strong fingers, hands and arms. (Mary, ask me what happened at Adelaide’s West beach 1986.)
            (Check the hands, fingers of another pianist, German Katarina Treutler!)

          • The bulge at the forearm also contains a rotator muscle. But just wait until you get into feet, they are even more interesting.

  9. “Just a thought — why isn’t the Woke Set focusing on the fact that a jury in Boston, in 2013, condemned a Chechnyan boy to death without a fair trial? ”
    Now there’s a rabbit hole, excellent point and if we work out, dominoes !

    Done my first elbow wiki driveby, biggest thing was last year, a bad car accident(this can be a dot), Senator dies in car, was Shorten and wife there? The odds, then disappears last month with the coff.
    Scomo can get a really nice underground bunker now, really nice. Do a what his worth search, 4years ago to now. Clicks over like the electronic display at petrol stations, after Elbow does a Biden on the hydrocarbons. People thrown down stairs, ama daughters dying, asio and Chinese developers. If they are getting “heat”, they should walk away, to take the money for holding the woke set focus on the right virtue, while selling us out per Cabinet’s given(WEF, WHO, etc) instruction. Its not good, no heart and soul.

  10. “Senator dies in car, was Shorten and wife there? The odds, then disappears last month with the coff.”

    Simon, What are you trying to tell us here in the Anglophone world?

    • “Yeah, there were machinations and arguments going on. That does happen. That’s not unique. But we have a woman who’s 52, who’s pulled over by the side of the road and died unexpectedly. It’s shocking. It’s terrible.”

      Mr Shorten arrived at the scene of Senator Kitching’s death after her husband, Mr Landeryou, phoned him and his wife Chloe, a close friend from school.

      “We sat with a couple of dear friends of Kimberley and Andrew on the side of the road as we waited for the undertaker’s van to turn up,” Mr Shorten said.

      https://www.smh.com.au/national/senator-had-health-issues-and-faced-factional-brawl-before-heart-attack-20220311-p5a3vo.html

      Can’t find it free now, but at the time, had read they were there before even the ambulance.
      An undertakers van, it’s odd, the death certificate before undertaker – who signed it .
      The way they wailed, to much, the double meaning from Shorten(this guy). The Senator was pushing on their sugar daddy.
      Elbow was visibly shocked. He was, bounced back, ok to go.
      You don’t think elections are fair dinkum, just small adjustments for little unexpected things. He won big I think, not really looked. Have another fine on the way that I can add to my collection, don’t pay them either.

      Accidents, check out the guy from Big Brother, kids shows, billionaire. Follow the foundation money to agenda.

      Thanks to Mary, that kid, your tenacity is inspiring.

      • How about this, Simon — from wikipedia:

        On December 18, 1972, a few weeks after the election, Biden’s wife Neilia and one-year-old daughter Naomi were killed in an automobile accident while Christmas shopping in Hockessin, Delaware.[26][55] Neilia’s station wagon was hit by a semi-trailer truck as she pulled out from an intersection.

        Their sons Beau (aged 3) and Hunter (aged 2) survived the accident and were taken to the hospital in fair condition, Beau with a broken leg and other wounds and Hunter with a minor skull fracture and other head injuries.[56] Biden considered resigning to care for them,[18] but Senate Majority Leader Mike Mansfield persuaded him not to.[57]

        • There is a conspiracy theory, that sometimes, the person that made the deal, gets the choice. The war on drugs was just starting up, Biden pushed the “3 strikes and your out” line. I’ve heard certain people are still locked up over minor crack cocaine, marijuanas type offenses TODAY.

          Claim: In 1973, Joe Biden said “I know what is good for the negro”
          Claimed by: Peggy Hubbard
          Fact check by USA Today: False
          So it must be true.

          Those DuPont’s and those bank scandals. 22.5 millions in bad loans to the Delaware Farmers Bank almost bankrupted the state, not long after Biden moved up. Chicken feed, the blue eyed boy remaining could spend that on a wild weekend.

          It’s a thing “accidents”, they signal with it to, why I watch, things said and the way a coffin is carried, type stuff.

  11. George Christensen looking on the bright side:

    Freedom parties (e.g. One Nation, UAP, Liberal Democrats, Australian Federation Party, IMOP, Katter’s Australia Party, etc) scored more than 12% of the nationwide vote, which — if voters preferenced every minor party on the ticket — would be enough to score a freedom party Senator in each State.

    Pauline Hanson — a key fighter for freedom — is likely to be re-elected to the Senate.

    A lot of left-wing Liberals have been given the boot all over the country.

    Labor’s Kristina Kenneally — who continually tried to paint the freedom movement as domestic terrorists — has been removed from office. She was set to be Home Affairs Minister (and in charge of ASIO and the Australian Federal Police) and would’ve come after us.

    A government that not only didn’t stand up against vaccine mandates but was complicit in enacting those mandates has been defeated.

    We still have good people like Senator Malcolm Roberts, Senator Gerard Rennick and Senator Alex Antic in the Federal Parliament fighting for us.

    • As I mentioned before the “Freedom Parties” need a remodel, into one big party, but Clive and Pauline need a radical image enhancement, they have so many knives sticking out of their backs. Plenty of other talent to appoint an alt-shadow cabinet, and get some control over the media to break down the lies, too many to mention, well I will mention one again, that is Red-party premier McGollum sacked so many hospital workers that he broke the hospital system, now he is trying to blame tha ambulance service. McGollum, time to consider euthanasia I think, you present no value to society, rather you degrade it.

      • Taiwan was part of the Japanese Empire, along with Korea, until the end of ww2.
        So why isn’t Korea part of China ? The Korean war I guess. Chiang Kai Shek’s Taiwan is an enemy combatant of Mao’s China. But going back 500 years ago the Chinese burned their navy and that’s when they abandoned their claim to anything offshore. Now they feel they are in a position to get their stuff back – after 500 years.
        Trump has said they will do Taiwan and the chip factory was moved to Israel, by way of the Taiwanese factory becoming obsolete and asset stripped I guess. The real question now is, what is Trump’s “Space Force”, what did they put up there, what are they capable of, what is their intention, who is the ultimate controller etc.
        Boeing got out of commercial planes after the shonky upgraded planes dropped out of the sky in Africa somewhere, they are doing the Space Force stuff most likely now. It seems this confrontation has been in preparation for some time. The enforced “austerity” in Shanghai seems to be just part of it. Maybe the Covidiots are being played, as there is a bigger agenda to all this.
        Surely there is an easier way to take down Swissy / USD hegemony ?
        But I guess nobody would make any money out of that.

        • Boeing you say, Boeing “Defence”(this name change is when turned) turned Australia. They like Brisbane, Williamtown, being near BOM big radar, electronic warfare upgrades.

          Boeing is the most geo-engineering used plane, Australia 1973.

          https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_Departments/Parliamentary_Library/pubs/rp/rp2021/SpecialPurposeAircraft
          Extract:
          “The potential for a Boeing 707 to join the RAAF’s VIP fleet emerged early in 1973, when one of the two engines on the VIP BAC 1–11 transporting Prime Minister Gough Whitlam to New Zealand failed mid-flight.[90] It was subsequently reported that, in the interests of safety, any future overseas flights by the prime minister would be undertaken by either chartering a Boeing 707 or by the RAAF acquiring one for its own VIP fleet.[91]

          Media reporting in March 1974 indicated that the federal government had abandoned plans to procure Boeing 707 aircraft for the RAAF’s VIP fleet, as its limited use would not justify the additional expense.[92] However, later that year Lionel Murphy (representing the prime minister in the Senate) declared the Defence Department’s continued interest in the aircraft and contended that the Boeing 707 ‘is well suited for the long range transportation of freight and men as well as for VIP use”

          Today this shows Boeing Defence is going to run drones out of Toowoomba’s private faculty(all shareholders not identified) Welcome Camp. Given Premier Annastacia Palaszczuk, love of the yuan and poisoning people, interesting bedfellows.
          https://statements.qld.gov.au/statements/93300

          The 737 workhorse, I think has been fazed out for Gulfstreams, modified in Israel, for bigger payload, 80,000 ceiling and automated flights. With the wanted movement restrictions, won’t be so much need for these.

          I disagree with Korea being the same the Han Chinese, of mainland China. They are often mistaken as original ethic groups like Taiwan and Singapore(Lee Kuan Yew born Singapore but Han, and shows a nexus between some English and some Chinese as well)
          There is a look, I can tell a Korean or Singaporean from a Han Chinese, Taiwan would also have a different look to Chiang Kai Shek’s Han, though few in number now, and I have no personal interaction.
          Goes back to the trading companies, like you say.

  13. Down under we have power that is above the law, therefore there is no law, it is the Khazarian Mafia.
    Together with crown agents and CCP billionaires they conduct the symphony here, from centre stage Alpha Lodge in Sydney.
    Pray that I’m totally off the mark and someone please prove this is not so. As is, they’re getting ready for round 2, with winter closing in, goons and snoops on all bases loaded. No need to worry ‘big brother’ saves! Mind#uckery on all.

    • I always thought “Forest Lodge” was a funny name for a suburb in Sydney. I don’t know where all the temples are but they are probably on zoom lately therefore – hackable.

  14. Is GreatGameIndia An Intelligence Operation?
    May 22, 2022

    As you already know, since the beginning of COVID-19 GreatGameIndia is being actively hounded for publishing controversial stories. We were able to track down the head of the snake, so to say, to the Atlantic Council – which is the military propaganda arm of NATO and interestingly also controls the network of the so-called “fact-checkers”.

    BIG STORY: Genetically Modified Strain Of Monkeypox Kills 250 Million People In War Game Simulation Prompting New Pandemic Warning

    Read on –

    https://greatgameindia.com/greatgameindia-intelligence-operation/

    • GreatGameIndia is going gangbusters, I didn’t look at it for a while, compare with Australian SBS TV for example, they are reporting on two different planets

  15. The Climate changers are going to starve us to death –

    The Great Reset: U.N. Joins World Economic Forum to BAN Oil, Gas, and Coal Use

    U.N. chief Antonio Guterres on Wednesday has vowed to ban all oil, gas, and coal use on a global scale as part of a self-described global climate Marshall Plan.

    The Portuguese Socialist spoke ahead of the upcoming World Economic Forum (WEF) annual meeting in Davos, Switzerland, which has also called for a ban on all carbon emissions.

    To avoid a “climate emergency,” humanity must “end fossil fuel pollution and accelerate the renewable energy transition, before we incinerate our only home,” Guterres said.

    Read on –

    https://newspunch.com/the-great-reset-u-n-joins-world-economic-forum-to-ban-oil-gas-and-coal-use/

  16. Australia is well and truly f…

    Albanese just swore an affirmation that he will well and truly serve the Commonwealth of Australia. How is that possible when the CofA is a corporation registered with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission?

  17. OK, Foffa, what happened at West Beach, SA, in 1986?

    (I bought a condo there and sold it around that time for what i considered a high price — 23K. AS IN TWENTY-THREE THOUSAND DOLLARS, AUD)

        • Agree ant56. Like when Gavin Le Seur sailed on this w.surfer from Melbourne to Sydney. He made it and became famous – first page news all over Oz. He was nearly killed by a persistent 40 – 60 knotter closer to Mallacoota. He scared the hell out of the 1 man light house keeper on Gabo Island, wanting a bed for the night. He later became the GP at the Mallacoota medical centre. Having such good memories of the past, today’s Oz becomes a shock to the system.

          • 1984 — Dean Lukin, SA fisiherman (140 kilos) got gold in Olympic weightlifting. (240 kilos)

            Ads later showed a can of tuna and the giant Mr Lukin next to it, with the slogan: “Dean Lukin stands by his tuna.”

            Ah, good for your Missus, Foffa.

C'mon Leave a Reply, Debate and Add to the Discussion

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.