Home Fam-Court Dr Russell Pridgeon Sorts Out the “Perpetrators Rights” in Family Court

Dr Russell Pridgeon Sorts Out the “Perpetrators Rights” in Family Court

29

After Dr Russell gave his speech in Brisbane  (regarding his “criminal” case), he stopped for coffee and spoke to two interested citizens. He defined the perfect solution for any perpetrator of child sexual abuse. That person need only take a plea for custody to the Family Court and this will cause a police investigation of the crime to be magically wiped off the books!

This magic scheme depends on the Protective parent being told that the police cannot investigate a case while it is “before the courts.”

Needless to say there is no basis in law for such a thing.

SHARE

29 COMMENTS

  2. At the 4-minute mark, the lady on the right side of the screen says “One thing [Dr Pridgeon] gave those children was faith in humanity. ” She goes on to say how the kids are hurt by betrayal of the adults who should rescue them.

    I recall a torturee, maybe it was Maher Arar of Canada, saying that he was blindfolded and was used to getting kicked around, but when he sensed that a Canadian diplomat was in the room and did nothing to help, that was even more painful.

  3. It appears that there are as many criminals in the “legal system” as there are on the outside. What is going on is absolutely disgusting. This abuse of justice is happening in all types of criminal cases.
    You need look no further than the Port Arthur Massacre case.

    When these outrages happen against children it is even worse than normal. Remember Martin Bryant was not more than a child, mentally. The police, politicians, intelligence agencies and people within the court system pick their victims well.

  4. The courts like the Australian government are not only illegal but pseudo courts or simply
    administration courts with a pseudo or de facto government not recognised in the Australian Constitution government. https://thelawdictionary.org/de-facto-court/

    The CORPORATION GOVERNMENT or the unconstitutional CORPORATION needs to be UN-INCORPORATED! We are under a ruse and unfortunately most people are unaware of it. The separation of powers is a myth and people need to understand and realise it is a myth and a complete fiction. I will endeavor to prove it to you as it is not difficult to provide the correct information and evidence in abundance. Most Americans and Australians do not understand the type of system that we have unfortunately, nor do they understand the framework of what is ‘supposed’ to be. Both are ruled and controlled by foreign dictation. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ABN CORPORATION vs. The United States of America and THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA vs. the Commonwealth of Australia. Both Corporation NAMES are registered in Washington D.C. for those who do not know. This knowledge seems to become more widespread now. We are dealing with, or should I say the ‘commercial entities’ is dealing with us.

    The UNITED STATES OF AMERICA was incorporated in London in 1783. The United States of America is a territory of Great Britain. The Colonists did not win the Revolutionary War. The British troops did not leave until 1796. Republican v. Sweets, 1 Dallas 43; Treaty, 8 Stat. 116; The Society for Propagating the Gospel & c .v. New Haven, 8 Wheat 464, Treaty of Paris (Peace), 8 Stat. 80, IRS Publication 6209, Articles of Confederation, October 20, 1774.

    No judicial courts, nor judges, have existed in America since 1789. Executive Administrators, not judges, enforce Statues and Codes. FRC v. GE, 281 US 464, Keller v. PE, 261 US 428, 1 Stat. 138-178. See also the 11th Amendment. This was the abolishment of all inferior courts to hear cases of law or equity (this means that all courts below the “one supreme courts”, not the U. S. Supreme Court.

    “The People” do not include you and me since our names are all Capital Letter fictional names.
    Barron v. Mayor of city coundil of Baltimore, 32 U. S. 243

    Definition of Usurp-Usurpation
    Latin usurpare to take possession of without legal claim
    to seize and hold (as office, place, or powers) in possession by force or without right
    Encroach or infringe upon (someone’s rights)
    The unlawful seizure or assumption of sovereign power; the assumption of government or supreme power by force or illegally, in
    derogation of the constitution and of the rights of the lawful ruler. Black’s Law Law Dictionary: What is USURPATION?

    We are not under the auspices and protection of a genuine and legitimate government as we all think of government and what that means and how we were taught in school.

    Looks like corrupt Family Court Chief Justice John Pascoe is playing games again.
    https://www.facebook.com/kangaroocourtofaustralia/posts/1832987533425355

    The Kangaroo Court Of Australia
    https://anonhq.com/kangaroo-court-australia/
    Within the system that is the Family Court of Australia, Child Representatives are appointed to protect children and act in the child’s best interests. Yes! If only that were true it would be acceptable, but forcing children to live with dying drug addicts, pedophiles and rapists is hardly acting “in the child’s best interests”. All to often these bizarre decisions are being made in the Kangaroo Court of Australia but you would not hear about it on the six o’clock news or read it in the newspaper.

    “How is that even possible? “Why all the secrecy? The reason why these decisions made in the Family Court of Australia are not broadcasted is through “suppression orders’ whereby if you write or televise any information concerning a case then you risk jail time. The suppression orders are put there to “protect children” or so the Family Court of Australia will lead you to believe. In reality it is to “hide their corrupt decisions and draconian ethics” as the truth must never be told to the Public. That the Family Court of Australia is a corrupt Legal organization, which enables the abuse of children and battered women . It is even rumored that Child Protection actually will protect abusers instead of children. That is the real reason why suppression orders are put in place to protect the corrupt Judges, barristers, child protection services, the police and the legal aid commissions that are all involved in Family Court cases. Simply “saving their backsides” at the expense of human lives.

    Open Letter to the AGs about Family Court Misconduct and ‘Parent Alienation’
    https://gumshoenews.com/2018/09/27/open-letter-to-the-ags-about-family-court-misconduct-and-parent-alienation/

    THE CARING COURT
    https://medium.com/kafkascourt/kangaroo-court-family-law-in-australia-1-b18c3221b296

    https://kangaroocourtofaustralia.com/aboutshane-dowling/
    Kangaroo Court of Australia is focused on investigating and reporting political corruption, judicial corruption and the associated police corruption.

  5. De facto court
    One established, organized, and exercising its judicial functions under authority of a statue apparently valid, though under authority of a statue may be in fact unconstitutional and may be afterwards so adjudged; or a court established and citing under the authority of a de facto government . 1 Bl. Judgm. 173; in re Manning, 139 U.S. 504, 11 s. Ct. 624, 35 L.Ed. 264; Gildemeister v. Lindsay, 212 Mich. 299, 180 N.W. 633, 635.
    The above list is not comprehensive only in Black’s Law Dictionary.
    http://www.duhaime.org/LegalDictionary/D/DeFacto.aspx
    A de facto government is one which has seized power by force or in any other unconstitutional method and governs in spite of

    the existence of a de jure government.
    “De facto characterizes a state of affairs which, for all practical purposes, must be accepted notwithstanding its illegality or illegitimacy. The de facto doctrine is sometimes engaged to uphold rights, obligations and other effects which are said to have arisen under an enactment later held to be without constitutional integrity.”
    (This is where you have Judicial Dictatorship and it should go to a Referendum to the people in the view of Thomas Jefferson and President Theodore Roosevelt. If the majority of people in a democratic government in which we presently do not have in Australia, disagrees with the Supreme Court decision, it goes to the people or an amendment is legislated on and before for the people so that you always have this healthy tension of checks and balances between the Executive, Legislative, the Judiciary and ‘We the People’ Remember it is our constitution not theirs! It is in the book ‘Judicial Dictatorship’)
    In a 1910 publication on the de facto doctrine, Albert Constantineau wrote:
    “The de facto doctrine is a rule or principle of law which, in the first place, justifies the recognition of the authority of governments established and maintained by persons who have usurped the sovereign authority of the State, and asset themselves by force and arms against the lawful government; secondly, which recognizes the existence of, and protects from collateral attack, public or private bodies corporate, which, though irregularly or illegally organized, yet, under colour of law, openly exercises the powers and functions of regularly created bodies; and, thirdly, which imparts validity to the official acts of persons who, under colour of right or authority, hold office under the aforementioned governments or bodies, or exercise lawfully existing offices of whatever nature, in which the public or third persons are interested, where the performance of such official acts is for the benefit of the public or third persons, and not for their own personal advantage….
    “Again, the doctrine is necessary to maintain the supremacy of the law and to preserve peace and order in the community at large, since any other rule would lead to such uncertainty and confusion, as to break up the order and quiet of all civil administration. Indeed, if any individual or body of individuals were permitted, at his or their pleasure, to challenge the authority of and refuse obedience to the government of the state and the numerous functionaries through whom it exercises its various powers, or refuse to recognize municipal bodies and their officers, on the ground of irregular existence or defective titles, insubordination and disorder of the worst kind would be encouraged, which might at any time culminate inanarchy.” Again the above statements are treasonous to say the least! Over-throwing a government is treason and sedition and all of those who are responsible should be charged appropriately.
    http://truth-now.net/de-jure-government-or-de-facto/
    For a relevant definition let’s witness several court cases …..
    Ex-judge hits out at ‘elected dictatorship’
    http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/exjudge-hits-out-at-elected-dictatorship/2007/05/15/1178995158740.html
    “But in a society such as Australia’s, a bill of rights would not be operating in isolation. It would instead be supported by democratic government,
    an independent judiciary, an independent press and a culture that values respect for human rights.

      • Yeah, we’ve commented on ‘his’ (I have no idea who or what he/she is) waffling on and on and on…..

        Get to the freaking point of the thread, focus and then get the fork out. If you just want to masturbate yourself, then do it where we don’t have to watch.

        • Where is your comment then Terry? It is pretty self explanatory. For a legal person it should even be clearer to you. No need to become rude over a simple post.

    • Arlyn:
      I’m trying to work through what you have presented. You seem to confirm much of what I have read/heard etc. You have a good body of work which you should be able to put together a proper series of articles, as there is a definite structure to all this. This is why I wonder whether there is a financial transaction that occurs when an aggrieved parent (initially) goes to CPS or related organization to report on the other parent.
      Unfortunately I don’t know how to go about finding that one out. (reposting this – it didn’t seem to take yesterday)

      • Justin
        🙂 Thank you. You are most correct in your analysis. I have known about this for approximately 30 years now but unfortunately Australians don’t seem to get it! They are still fighting the system that has changed and they haven’t even noticed it… It is properly called sedition and High Treason but no one wants to say it. People don’t seem to read good material any more.

        I will put another post or two for you to corroborate
        AS YOU WILL SEE, YOU CANNOT CHANGE OUR NAME WITHOUT REFERENDUM FOR STARTERS

        WHITLAM RAISED “STATUTE LAW REVISION ACT 1974 ASSENTED TO ON THE SAME DAY AS THE 1973 ACT” THIS ACT WAS USED TO REPEAL THE 1973 ACT WHICH WAS THEN REMOVED FROM THE INTERNET BUT HOW DOES A 1974 ACT GET ASSENT IN 1973?

        WHEN YOU READ THE ATTACHED I HOPE THAT YOU WILL FEEL AS CHEATED AS I DO

        WHY HAVE THE TRAITORS IN OUR GOVERNMENT NOT BEEN BROUGHT TO ACCOUNT FOR WHILE EVER THEY FAIL TO, IT MAKES ALL POLITICIANS COMPLICIT

  6. Dr Pridgeon is no paedophile. Paedophiles hide behind suppression orders to conceal their identities for as long as the courts will allow. Dr Pridgeon is doing the opposite. He is proudly showing his face as a protector of children. Paedophiles are covert, clandestine, hidden. People who beleive that Dr Pridgeon is a paedophile based on assertions by the AFP and the mass media rubbish they are fed by the likes of channel 9, are morons.

  7. Found this remark about judges when perusing NSW Law Professor Anne Coussins’ book, Alternative Methods of Prosecuting Child Abusers:

    “5.35 Over the years there has been anecdotal evidence that judges are reluctant to intervene in the conduct of cross-examination (see, for example, Cashmore &Bussey, 1995) and this evidence was confirmed by Cashmore and Trimboli (2005).

    “In all the trials observed, judicial intervention was least common ―to protect the child witness from badgering or oppressive questioning, [or] to support and encourage the child‖, with only 20.6% of judicial interventions being made to control cross-examination…”

  9. Dr Pridgeon is very accurate indeed regarding the agenda of the family court and their partners the CPS’s when abuse has been reported as I went through exactly the same thing though he does not mention the more secret agenda involving organized child abuse or that private club all those involved drink at

  10. Thank you Dr Pridgeon and strength to you. So much of what you say in this 7 minutes video resonates deeply for me personally [ as I know it does for so many], and it relates to decades of trying to fight the “system” from within, and then going public, writing to journalists, ministers, politicians and responding to inquiries and investigations into criminal actives. This has resulted in extreme “bullying,” being ostracised, humiliated, discredited, openly tracked and targeted, and subjected to murderous threats. It is the sheer frustration of not being heard, listened too, and the magnitude of it all.
    I cite the following points:
    ” the problem is of course that the people who are involved become so seriously traumatised they become literally unable to function in any way that will effectively oppose the court and most people have just given up”
    “the reason to start the anti pedophile party is to get this out in open Parliament”
    “The perpetrators take refuge in the family law court”
    also the question near the end of the conversation ” If we told the public this had happened would the people ever want to Know???”

  11. Connecting some dots from recent posts-a bit off topic but I believe relevant and of importance.
    I recently said
    “Until the impact of the Military MKULTRA subprojects are acknowledged and people –all of us –can look at how we all have been brainwashed, mind controlled, enslaved and deceived there is little hope. Ahh but there is a Tipping Point so we continue to support and give voice and take action.
    Perhaps we need to get out the sledge hammers”

    Julius I found this link you posted - brilliant for my writing

    https://disqus.com/home/discussion/channel-cuttingremarks/assange_false_flag_psy_op/

    And today I heard people interviewing Tiger Wood on his victory, describing him as “a finely honed machine trained like a computer—a special type of genius”

    These same words could apply to Julian Assange. Then I found this about Monarch programming.

    I quote from
    The Illuminati Formula Used to Create an
    Undetectable
    Total Mind Controlled Slave
    by Cisco Wheeler and Fritz Springmeier
    “This book is dedicated to the two million Americans and counting who have been programmed with Monarch-type trauma-based mind control. This book is written to destroy trauma-based mind control before it destroys the human race. It’s time for this horrendous secret to end. It is also written as part of God’s end time work to propel people of faith to the high calling that is prophesied of the Body, but cannot be attained without men of faith understanding these things. Humanity’s great prophet said he came to heal those whose hearts had been broken– literally split and crushed, and to free those who are captive. That work needs to go forward.”

    • Personal message:
      For Diane, facebook style, I am on holiday(from comment, too much of a good thing, lol) and have no social media that I except(semi anonymous accounts for viewing only) , except here.
      Its not off topic, its the node that connects.

      I rarely feel good about our quicksand setup. Once family is our lucky fortune, we be tied to a collected future. Mine buy the company line, against all logic.
      No choice about collected future(or past). Funny, I have been feeling a bit better lately. The conspiracy theorist push back has been strong of late and agenda’s seems to be pushing too hard. Game on ? no way, this is no game. That time of year Easter/Passover/Ramadan, great to share space and time here with you all, regardless of our seemly dire prospects.
      Doctor Pridgeon, your a good man. No higher praise is possible, its as simply as that. Hope I have that strength under fire. Extraordinary to be sure.

      • Thank you Simon for your personal message, [facebook style :-)) ] , and your insightful reflections on the extraordinary times we live in.
        .” Doctor Pridgeon you’re a good man. No higher praise is possible”. Beautifully expressed.Strength to us all and thank you Dee and Mary for your extraordinary work keeping the Gumshoe vessel afloat and on course through turbulent times.

C'mon Leave a Reply, Debate and Add to the Discussion

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.