Eusociality, Part 12: Deliberate Destruction of the Habitat

Tsunami in Japan 2011 (20,000 died); Bushfire in Australia 2009 (173 died); Earthquake in Haiti 2010 (150,000 died): photo of homeless being ferried out of Port au Prince

by Mary W Maxwell, LLB

Once again, I am making reference, if only lightly, to the concept of eusociality, which means a society can act with an intense togetherness.  Members of eusocial groups — and in fact all of the social species — think dolphin and wolf — behave in a way that benefits their survival.

In H sapiens, the individual depends on the wiles of the group. An individual, if left isolated, cannot do all that is necessary, say, for food-getting. When did you last grow your own food, or fish or hunt for it? Could you have learned to protect yourself from the cold as an infant?  You need your group.

But if group life evolved to benefit the members, why is so much destruction happening today? The topic to be considered in this article is weather-tampering or geoengineering.  The technology for this is very sophisticated, so it has to be wealthy powerful people who are engaged in it. But how do those persons hope to escape from such widespread harming of nature?

Are Natural Disasters Natural?

I shall lay out here the “natural disasters” of recent decades that I think were not natural. I have only circumstantial evidence for my belief that they were malicious. A later article will analyze the causes of such malice, if malice it be.

Let’s make six brief categories.. Under the heading of water, we can discuss flooding, tsunamis, and mudslides. Under fire, we can look at wildfires, heatwaves, and ionospheric heating.  Wind can be the reference point for tornadoes, hurricanes and cyclones. Clouds and sun’s rays will bring to mind the chemtrail issue. Finally, earthquakes.

After that, just a word about Elana Freeland’s book (2018), about nuclear radiation and electromagneticwaves. Hop straight to that section if you know the rest.

Water

Before man came along, water was doing its thing. Rivers flowed, rain fell, snowstorms occurred. But could man just sit back and admire it all? No. Even in ancient times, irrigation projects were brought in to help agriculture. Dams were built, canals were invented.

However, I am interested in destruction not production. In the 1970s it was boasted by the US military that we had caused floods in Vietnam to make the roads too muddy for the enemy to travel on. I think many of the 21st century’s harmful floods were caused. Examples: Peru in 2009, Pakistan in 2010, Queensland Australia in 2012.

Tsunamis have to do with the ability of God or man to cause a tidal wave. I think the 2004 tsunami in Ache, Indonesia was caused by explosions, and the same for Japan’s tsunami. In 2006 there was a popular movie,” The Sinking of Japan,” which had scenes almost identical to the real thing that occurred five years later in 2011.

At NZHerald.co.nz, you can find a 2000 article entitled “Tsunami Bomb NZ’s Devastating War Secret.” Professor Thomas Leech was working on Project Seal, which is now declassified.

“A former colleague of Professor Leech, Neil Kirton, told the Weekend Herald that the experiments involved laying a pattern of explosives underwater to create a tsunami. Small-scale explosions were carried out in the Pacific and off Whangaparaoa, which at the time was controlled by the Army…. The US and British military … even considered sending Professor Leech to Bikini Atoll to view the US nuclear tests and see if they had any application to his work.”

As for mudslides, they often follow a flood (although a drought can also cause them). I am suspicious of the 2010 mudslides in both China and Brazil with many deaths. But wait till you hear how far I will go in the realm of speculation. I think the landslide in Wales in 1966 that wiped out a schoolhouse full of children was malicious. The slurry from a coal mine came down the hill into the school killing 116 people.

Fire

How could anyone think the ongoing fires of northern California are anything but malicious? Or the fire that lasted for months in Indonesia in 2014-15? How about the Kinglake fire in north of Melbourne in 2009? I think there was a Royal Commission on that one.  Always a good sign of cover-up.

As for me venturing into the unprovable, I believe that the Great Fire of London was no accident. Note that it occurred in 1666, and made way for a lot of gentrification in London. The same can be said (and is said by Sonia Poulton) about the Grenfell Tower fire in London in 2017.

Heatwaves? They are not a result of fire, actually, but of trapped air. Still, the effect is that you die from the heat. In the 2003 heat wave in Europe, 14,000 elderly people died in France. I think it was planned. “Testing 1,2,3.”

Now to ionospheric heating, which is also, of course, not fire. It has to do with transmitting radio waves (which I do not understand) into the ionosphere. In 1957, the International Geophysical Year, loads of nuclear explosions were carried out in the ionosphere, with public approval. HAARP is a heater of the ionosphere, based in Anchorage Alaska.

The website of University of Alaska says:
“HAARP [High-Frequency Active Auroral Research Project] is a scientific endeavor aimed at studying the properties and behavior of the ionosphere, with particular emphasis on being able to understand and use it to enhance communications and surveillance systems for both civilian and defense purposes.”

Wind

One day in July 2009, in Adelaide, the wind was so strong that it slammed my kitchen door shut, breaking the glass in the door. Didn’t take me a minute to decide that it was probably an experiment with a wind machine, like the kind that I think was used to accelerate the Kinglake fire in February that year. (Not mentioned by the Royal Commission, needless to say.)

Tornadoes involve winds of up to 300 miles an hour.  The year 2020 was a year for 90 tornadoes in the United States. While they often occur naturally, I believe they are also manmade.

Obama consoles a tornado victim in 2001 in Joplin, Missouri

Hurricanes can be modified, as your evening meteorologist is happy to announce. Wait, doesn’t that mean they can be modified maliciously? Surely Hurricane Katrina, a tryout for martial law in Louisiana in 2005, was manmade. I think all the major ones in the last six decades were, too, for example. Hurricane Betty, Andrew, Irene, Sandy.

Recall how Cyclone Tracy in Darwin in 1975 allowed some relocation of real estate. Cyclone Nargis in Burma in 2009 made millions homeless adding to the existing inter-ethnic tensions there.

Clouds and Sun’s Rays

The expert on clouds and chemtrails is Dane Wigington at geoengineeringwatch.com. It has taken a long time to get governments and scientists to admit that solar radiation is being “adjusted” by putting chemicals into our sky.

It is interesting to note what George Orwell said in his 1984 (written in 1949):

“Teams of experts are indefatigably at work. Some … explore even remoter possibilities such as focusing the sun’s rays through lenses suspended thousands of kilometers away in space, or producing artificial earthquakes and tidal waves by tapping the heat at the earth’s centre.”

Note: The main character in 1984, Winston, works at the “Ministry of Truth” where his job is to suppress history. That’s because if people knew the past, they would be empowered! Ahem.

Earthquakes

Here are just five of the 21st century’s earthquakes, shown with year and number of human deaths:

Gujerat, India 2001 (13K dead)

Bam, Iran 2003 (22K dead)

Sichuan, China 2008 (69K dead)

Haiti 2010 (at least 160K dead)

Christchurch, NZ 2011 (185 dead).

Yes, I know that earthquakes do occur naturally. But we also know they can be set by explosives, as was revealed in lawsuits against fracking.  Note: The US in 1982 became a signatory to “En-Mod.” That is the Environmental Modification Treaty of 1977.  It says:

“Each State Party to this Convention undertakes not to engage in military or any other hostile use of environmental modification techniques having widespread, long-lasting or severe effects as the means of destruction, damage or injury … [This refers to] the deliberate manipulation of natural processes….”

Circumstantial Evidence of Weather Control

Whilst government officials deny the very existence of weather control, ordinary folk can easily see it.  If the matter ever comes to court, circumstantial evidence of naughtiness can be cited. I offered the following list in my book Fraud Upon the Court:

1. The odd timing of two hailstorms in Australia – both at afternoon rush hour, one in Melbourne, one in Perth
2. The fact that Iceland was threatened by the International Monetary Fund shortly before its volcano erupted
3. The fact that US troops were present in Port-au-Prince just before Haiti’s 2010 earthquake and yet they were held back from assisting people
4. The fact that on the previous day the US military had a drill for a hurricane in Haiti
5. The flurry of relevant put options on the stock market, which happened in regard to several disasters
6. The fact that in this terrorism-conscious world, no official articulates the possibility that enemies may be blamed!
7. Emphasis, in The Australian, on Police Chief Christine Nixon’s hairdresser appointment in the investigation of the 2009 bushfire in Victoria

“Circumstantial evidence” is defined at FreeDictionary.com as:

“Evidence and testimony that permits conclusions…. Many circumstances can create inferences about an accused’s guilt, including the presence of a motive or opportunity to commit the crime, any denials, evasions, a contradiction on the part of the accused.”

Circumstantial evidence against governments for weather control is laid out by Mary Efrosini Gregory, author of Microwave War (2012). During the fires in the Greek Islands, she pointed out that the given “excuse” — dry weather and strong winds — could not be accurate, as the fire on the various islands broke out simultaneously and fire cannot travel across water.

Here are two of Mary Gregory’s opinions (admittedly speculative) about two other events. The first concerns the 2008 earthquake in Sichuan China with 69,000 deaths.  She notes that Sichuan is near Tibet, and thinks the “purpose” of the earthquake may have been to give Western aid workers an excuse to enter Tibet. Once inside, they could augment local protests against China.

The second case is that of the 2011 volcano in Iceland that spewed ash, and which was hazardous to planes. Mary Gregory opines that the volcano eruption was intended to exempt all heads of government from attending the 2011 funeral of the Polish leaders. (Those leaders — the president and Cabinet — had been en route to a memorial for the anniversary of the 1941 Katyn massacre of Polish officers, when a plane crash killed them!)

Furthermore, she thinks that the recent accidental death of those leaders was a punishment to Poland for standing up to the EU, the IMF, or some arm of the cabal. World leaders were required to boycott the funeral. They did in fact stay away.

Mary Gregory is a targeted individual who lives along the flightpath of commercial airlines landing at Kennedy Airport, New York. She receives hits from planes and has collected pictorial evidence of it.

Under an Ionized Sky

All of the above — fires, floods, and other biblical stuff — is nothing compared to what is going on with the latest technology. I cannot begin to cover it here, but I recommend you hasten to obtain Elana Freedman’s stunning 2018 book, Under an Ionized Sky: from Chemtrails to Space Fence Lockdown.

Please at least read, slowly and ponderously, the following quote from Matt Andersson, former executive adviser, of aerospace & defence at Booz Allen Hamilton.

“Few in the civil sector fully understand that geoengineering is primarily a military science and has nothing to do with either cooling the planet or lowering carbon emissions. While seemingly fantastical, weather has been weaponised. At least four countries – the US, Russia, China and Israel – possess the technology and organisation to regularly alter weather and geologic events for various military and black operations, which are tied to secondary objectives, including demographic, energy and agricultural resource management.”

Andersson also mentions “the use of polymerised aerosol viral agents and radioactive particulates carried through global weather systems” and — reach for your smelling salts “the gradual warming of polar regions to facilitate naval navigation and resource extraction.”

[The above appeared, amazingly, at TheGuardian.com, on February 9, 2012.]

Thank you, Matt Andersson and all who work to make accessible urgent knowledge about the destruction of the human habitat. We must find out how the chain of power and secrecy works such that huge decisions about our survival get made by persons who are unaccountable to us and who seem to be truly mad.