Home News Eusociality, Part 9: Quorum Sensing and Puppetization

Eusociality, Part 9: Quorum Sensing and Puppetization

30

(L) Antonio Damasio with wife/co-author Hanna, Photo: dornsife.usc.edu (R) Puppet show in Paris, Photo: mamalovesparis.com

by Mary W Maxwell, LLB

This article discusses two rather separate concepts. First it deals with quorum sensing, and second, with the fact that many important offices today are held by persons who are mere puppets of someone behind the scenes whose identity is a mystery.

Quorum sensing occurs when members of a group notice that they are numerically stronger then another group and therefore that is it probably safe to start certain actions. You may think I am referring to humans or at least clever mammals such as chimps or dolphins.  Sure, but quorum sensing is also done by bacteria. Tiny bacteria have the ability, without benefit of brain, to sense how many of them are in the group, and “decide” whether or not to undertake a task.

Neuroscientist Antonio Damasio is the head of the Brain and Creativity Institute in California. His new theory proposes an innate capacity in the human species to arrange its own group homeostasis. The human species could (somehow) sense the problems it may be suffering and instigate a response.   There definitely are problems today that affect the species as a whole. (Depleted uranium, anyone?)

Socio-cultural Homeostasis

Damasio calls his theory ‘socio-cultural homeostasis.’ Bacteria cannot do this. It involves the conscious brain, as described by him in the book “Self Comes to Mind.” At a video on his website he opines:

“And so what I think is happening with us is that little by little we have evolved the ability (with our very complex organization of the nervous system), to project the process of consciousness into a completely different dimension. Instead of just running the basic homeostasis, just running the basic life regulation (largely given by our genome), we can now invent something new:­ we can run what I like to call socio-cultural homeostasis; one in which we can create.”

Damasio also says:

“The brain’s development of a human self becomes a challenge to nature’s indifference and opens the way for a radical break in the course of evolution and the source of a new level of life regulation:­ socio-cultural homeostasis.”

To any readers who think this is just the gobbledygook of a dreamer, I can only say that Antonio Damasio’s neurological studies are clinically detailed and persuasive, such as in his book “The Feeling of What Happens.” Also, isn’t it true that there have been many leaders in human history who were able to nudge people into a quorum sensing, armed with a new plan for fixing a social problem?

And how is it that any individual can find resonance in the thought expressed by John Donne in 1624, in “No Man Is an Island”:

No man is an island entire of itself; every man is a piece

of the continent, a part of the main;

if a clod be washed away by the sea, Europe is the less,

as well as if a promontory were,

as well as a manor of thy friends or of thine own were;

any man’s death diminishes me, because I am involved in mankind.

And therefore never send to know for whom the bell tolls; it tolls for thee.

Imagining a Societal Human Mind

Thus far I have mentioned an individual leader cooking up a solution to a societal problem. But what if our leaders were not individuals using their own brain? What if they were enslaved to someone, whether by conscious coercion or some form of mind control?

In this series on eusociality, I use the concept of a unified brain, like that apparently of an ant colony, to pose the question: Can humans act as a unity? Do we ever exercise our brain together?

Mostly, we wait for a leader to suggest what we should do conjointly. If that leader happens to be an official with authority, he can make sure we follow the orders. Or the authority could be religious — in the old days, Catholics obeyed their bishop unquestioningly. The authority could also come from prestige; a high-class lady may set a trend in fashion.

Moreover, when a clever person invents a new tool, it spreads around the population. In some cases, our usage of a new tool depends on a system being in place to spread it to everyone. Consider the fact that your cell phone is part of a paying system — “Verizon” knows how much you owe at every moment, and the system that connects you to the person you are calling exists in a manner that is beyond your control.

The globalists want all of our economic endeavors to be unified. That goal is already partly in place through the massive control exercised by banks and by manufacturers’ corporations.

Puppetizing the Institutions

All of the above may be interesting history, but it stands in contrast to the events of perhaps the last 40 years. Pretend for a moment that you are a very naive person.  You want to go to a person who holds a high position in a particular area in order to suggest to him or her a way to solve a problem.  For example:

  1. You have accidentally discovered a cure for cancer. You would think of going to the American Cancer Society’s president, or a professor of Oncology at Boston University Medical School, or maybe the head of the NIH (National Institute of Health). That person should welcome you with open arms. It is her job, after all, to cure cancer if possible.
  2. You have discovered that someone is cheating on the vote count for a local town election. You could go to the Town Manager. Or if you wanted to punish the cheater, you could visit a police station or the district attorney’s office. Or you might call in to a radio talk show if that town has one. If it was a party-based election, you would naturally go to the state chairwoman of that party. She will be dying to hear about it, won’t she?
  3. A neighbor has confided in you that her son, who is in prison, has been raped but does not dare report as it will lead to retaliation. You realize you have to be careful as to whom you file a complaint with for that same reason. You might make an appointment to see the prison chaplain or your state assemblyman. Or you might search for a method whereby the young man can sue his attacker. The Yellow Pages suggests that there are attorneys looking for your business.

In all three cases, although you are not the boss, there should be ways for you to feed the data to the boss, who would then make the decision to carry out your request. Curing cancer, keeping elections honest, and avoiding the tragedy of rape are plainly acknowledged as social goods.  It’s not as if you are asking for something selfish, such as to be given a tax break, or something weird, like asking for all apples in the grocery stores to be replaced by mangoes.

But you won’t succeed. You may be turned away rudely.  You may be told that no one is available to talk to you. Possibly you will be listened to and informed that “it will be dealt with,” but it won’t.

So why is that?

It is because all the institutions referred to: university departments and laboratories and charities; town politicians and political party chairmen; and police, attorneys, and even chaplains, now serve some person or some policy other than the traditional one. I call them puppets.

Goals Are Perverted

This is not the place for me to answer the big question: Who’s Boss? But I can at least say that someone pulls the strings that make the aforementioned person fail to carry out society’s proper goals.

I know for sure (after much research) that cancer curers, even physicians with proof of their success, get punished, yes punished, for this humane act of saving a cancer sufferer from death.

I know, from Jim Collier’s 1992 book Votescam: the Stealing of America, that elections are regularly stolen, whether by electronic fiddling or by media suppression of candidates (of which I was one).

I know that chaplains do not work to end the problem of rape in prison, and that even an attorney who has a financial interest in helping a victim, knows which cases to skip. It is even rare for a legislator to press for an end to prisons-for-profit or to change the practice of wardens who turn families away based on some made-up ad hoc rule.

Is it any wonder, then, that people feel there’s something wrong? Has society gone nuts?

Puppeteers Have Their Reasons

Go back to the idea of quorum sensing. Creatures as simple as bacteria can make a decision in the interest of their group, based on sensing their moment of strength. Humans, according to Damasio, do this consciously and at an individual level. I say that leaders are the ones to make the move.

Recall that in Part 5 “Leadership with Love” I noted that leadership is a natural thing. There are non-official leaders everywhere. But “certain persons” dread the emergence of such persons. I believe, but cannot provide the evidence now, that young people are killed off (car accidents, botulism, whatever) if they have noticeable leaderlike traits.

However, the “certain persons” on top have another way of keeping challengers at bay.  They fill the institutions with officers who are NOT going to act in a leaderly way.  They see to it that men and women of their choosing are appointed or elected to fill decision-making roles. These are the puppeteers finding puppets to do their bidding.

I seem to recall that in the late 1980s, universities in more than one nation announced a policy by which the heads of academic departments would be asked to step down. A new head would be chosen by election, by other academics. Somehow the new occupant was a yes man. Academia is just one institution where that happened. As for the presidents of major colleges, the late Valerie Wolf of Tulane said the candidate had to be someone who was blackmailable.

Another institution we can name is the military.  About a decade ago, when there was a public uproar over the use of torture by American servicemen, 12 generals signed a letter to protest torture.  But every one of them was retired.  It is unlikely that generals on duty held a different view, but their pay or promotion was at stake….  What a shame that they did not band together and put their foot down on this subject.

And the Big Reason Is

To now answer the biological question: Do humans meet the criteria for eusociality?  Can we act with a unified brain? Well, no we can’t. It is not desirable anyway, but it is also not going to happen so long as a few individuals can replace leadership in every nook and cranny with servants to themselves. The whole thing is ridiculous, and we should stop putting up with it.

To end Part 9, I remind the reader of my sociobiological theory (hunch) as to what makes the Bozos tick. They have reached an alpha position — they are almost global alphas — and so their worst fear, conscious or otherwise, is that they will slip. If they do slip, if they lose the airtight control that they now “enjoy,” it will be most unpleasant for them.

They are scared and they worry. We should grab the chance to negotiate.

SHARE

30 COMMENTS

  1. Just back on that other topic.

    Yesterday Seth Holehouse [Man in America] interviewed David Martin and had the smile literally wiped off his face with some uncomfortable truths about “Trump and the Jab”

    https://rumble.com/vri2i3-lets-talk-trump-and-the-jab.html

    Today he is right back in the swing with attorney Michael Senger, author of a new book “Snake Oil: How Xi Jinping Shut Down the World”. Senger keeps up to date as an avid reader of the NYT and WaPo.

    • How Xi Jinping Shut Down the World – Seth Holehouse with Michael Senger

    https://rumble.com/vrmecl-how-xi-jinping-shut-down-the-world.html

    Am I operating at the wrong Gaia frequency or what? Or am I just projecting “the process of consciousness into a completely different dimension?”

    After all – COVID is just a distraction form the real (climate change) issues … right?

    https://worldtruthvideos.website/watch/jT7M2uV1TYu61ov

    Bernays coming up …

  2. This fits nicely here …

    Bernays et al

    The Century of the Self

    https://topdocumentaryfilms.com/the-century-of-the-self/

    or here in four parts –

    The Century of the Self – Part 1: “Happiness Machines”

    The Century of the Self – Part 2: “The Engineering of Consent”

    The Century of the Self – Part 3: “There is a Policeman Inside All Our Heads; He Must Be Destroyed.”

    The Century of the Self – Part 4: “Eight People Sipping Wine in Kettering”

    Frankfurt School coming up …

  3. WHAT-IS-AUSTRALIA

    Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (The Lawful one)
    Constitutional and Official Definitions
    17. In any Act. unless the contrary intention appears
    (a) “The commonwealth” shall mean the commonwealth of Australia:
    (b) “Australia” includes the whole of the Commonwealth
    .
    Acts Interpretation Act of 1973 (The Corrupt one)
    Constitutional and Official Definitions
    4: (1) Section 17 of the Principal Act is amended—
    (a) by omitting paragraphs (a) and (b) and substituting the following paragraph:-
    “(a) ‘Australia’ or ‘the Commonwealth’ means the Commonwealth
    of Australia and, when used in a geographical sense, does not include an external Territory

    Have you got your citizen ship.

    The whole Australian land mass is deemed to be covered by water
    15B Application of Acts in coastal sea
    Coastal sea of Australia
    (1) An Act is taken to have effect in, and in relation to, the coastal sea of Australia as if that coastal sea were part of Australia.
    (2) A reference in an Act to Australia, or to the Commonwealth, is taken to include a reference to the coastal sea of Australia.
    Coastal sea of external Territory
    (3) An Act that is in force in an external Territory is taken to have effect in, and in relation to, the coastal sea of the Territory as if that coastal sea were part of the Territory.
    (3A) A reference in an Act to all or any of the external Territories (whether or not one or more particular Territories are referred to) is taken to include a reference to the coastal sea of any Territory to which the reference relates.
    Definition
    (4) In this section, coastal sea:
    (a) in relation to Australia, means:
    (i) the territorial sea of Australia; and
    (ii) the sea on the landward side of the territorial sea of Australia and not within the limits of a State or internal Territory;
    and includes the airspace over, and the sea‑bed and subsoil beneath, any such sea; and
    (b) in relation to an external Territory, means:
    (i) the territorial sea adjacent to the Territory; and
    (ii) the sea on the landward side of the territorial sea adjacent to the Territory and not within the limits of the Territory;
    and includes the airspace over, and the sea‑bed and subsoil beneath, any such sea.

  7. Another great video to share (I was just tidying up some of my archives). This features Gerard Menuhin (author of “Tell The Truth and Shame the Devil”}

    The case of Horst Mahler – Gerard Menuhin about real refugees

  8. It seems to me that the “bozos” are desperate to prop up their foundational platform and some of their “sleepers” are getting a bit nervous that the “footings” of their edifice is crumbling so the props come out even in plain sight.

    I’ve said before that I think it very unlikely that all the people in Sodom and Gomorrah were rampaging poofters, and I think it very likely that there were many people complaining about violations of their “rights”; possibly some fair and some ridiculous demands for unrestrained liberties. What I can envisage is a common, damning, “eusocial” agreement that says “You piss off, Mr Lott, and take your God with you! We’re running this show and we don’t want any interference from the likes of you and your outmoded ideas.”

    The “New Right”, the “Old Right”, the “New Left”, the “Old Left”, anything at all can/may make any dialectical complaints about the symptoms of social disorder and propose any superficial “remedies” but do not ever cast aspersions against the supreme Sacred Cow of Nothing turning itself into the ultimate “Man Made Humanity” representing the “becoming” Cosmic Consciousness.

    The thing that is entirely anathema to those who would install themselves (collectively) as the arbiters of the nature and purpose (and end) of the whole shebang is that the whole shebang is created by an antecedent supreme Power with a predetermined purpose. i.e. the whole shebang is the manifestation of an eternal Power, Intellect and Will by Creation, Redemption, Justice, Mercy and punishment and reward.

    The train of Mud Minds that follow the great variety of Yowies into the absurdity of dogmatic Materialism known as “Evolution” culminating in “democracy” are really only saying “You piss off, Mr God, we’re running this show.”

    None of the “bozo’s” lackeys would be even slightly interested in Max Kolbe’s suggested remedies. This Westen bod apparently deliberately omits that Kolbe knew and said that the ‘Masons were pawns of the anti-Christian Jews. But what’s a “Jew”? No one can come up with a definition of “Jew” that encompasses all who claim to be “Jews”. I suggest that the term should be applied as it was in John’s Gospel. The bloody Jews (as in His Blood be on us and our children) is differentiated from the “true Israelite in whom there is no guile”.

    Anyhow, here’s Westen trying not to get offside with Judeo-Masonry in the Vatican:
    https://rumble.com/vq16t0-jhw-show-maximilian-kolbe.html

    • Thanks oldavid – I always read and take your comments seriously. I may not understand everything you say but I think this is relevant.

      Aldous Huxley & Deep State Predictive Programming – Cynthia Chung, Tim Kirby and Joaquin Flores

      Happy end of bozo-year.

      • G’donya, Joolyers, it’s good of you to be somewhat indulgent to my autistic proclivities of trying to say too much with too few words.

        Those bods you linked above said pretty much what I’d already come across and have some knowledge of. For some reason they ignored Rene Guenon, and the Coomeraswami clan that were pretty much contemporary and competitors with the Blavatsky mob. Just about all the pedlars of occult “wisdom” can be linked around the early C20.

        I’m a bit more interested in “what’s wrong” rather than “who’s wrong”…. unless the “whos” are right in my face, of course.

        • As much as I like Joaquin – and Cynthia (and Matthew) – not so familiar with Tim, did you pick up on the fact that they sidestep the elephant … It is the “elites” who are running Hollywood … and it is the “elites” who brought the Frankfurt School ideology and methodology to Hollywood?

    • The adherents of black skinned Nimrod a descendant of Cush are attempting to rebuild a modern version of ancient Babylon by uniting the worlds populations into a One World Government.

      The people who call themselves Jews are Hamites – NOT Semites.

      Judah married and had sons to the daughter of foreign gods——a Canaanite woman. Malachi, chapter 3 & 2:11., Genesis 38:1-10 who later intermarried with the children of Esau/Edom. Herod was an Edomite.

      A Jewish Mother decides legal status

      It’s not a point of view it is the Jews law –

      “………..There are situations in Jewish law where, even in the course of a sexual relationship, no paternity is established. According to Jewish law, the child of a relationship between a Jew and a Gentile always assumes the legal status of its mother. The child bears no legal relationship to its father. See Babylonian Talmud, Yevamot 22a-b; Jacob ben Asher, Tur, Even Haezer ch. 16. This is equally true in cases of artificial insemination…………”

      https://www.jlaw.com/Articles/maternity_notes.html

      • Yair, good luck to you, Crossy, if you want to farkaround with all that bullshit you can align yourself with “the Sons of Abraham” demanding a place at table or denying others according to some “heritage rights”; try your luck. Personally, I wouldn’t want to be trying to convince the Judge that He was wrong and that some heritage or ethnic types are automatically included or excluded.

    • Who is a Jew?

      Revelation 3:9,”Behold, I give out of the synagogue of Satan those saying themselves to be Jews, and they are not, but they lie,. Behold, I will make them them come and bow down before your feet, and they shall know that I loved you.”

      Romans 2:28-29 “……….For he is not a Jew that is one outwardly, nor is circumcision that outwardly in the flesh; but he is a Jew that is one inwardly and circumcision is of the heart, in spirit, not in letter; of whom the praise is not from men, but from God.”

      “Today the Gentile Christians who claim of holy right have been led in the wrong path. We, of the Jewish Faith have tried for centuries to teach the Gentiles a Christ never existed, and that the story of the Virgin and of Christ is, and always has been, a fictitious lie. In the near future, when the Jewish people take over the rule of the United States, legally under our god, we will create a new education system, providing that our god is the only one to follow, and proving that the Christ story is a fake…Christianity will be abolished.” (M.A. Levy, Secretary of the World League of Liberal Jews, in a speech in Los Angeles, California, August, 1949

      There is nothing original with or about those who adorn themselves in black robes today – judges, Jews, priests etc.

      “The Jew…is not content merely to destroy Christianity, but he preaches the gospel of Judaism; he not only assails the Catholic or the Protestant faith, but he incites to the unbelief, and then imposes on those whose faith he has undermined his own conception of the world, of morality and of life. He is engaged in his historic mission, the annihilation of the religion of Christ.” (Benard Lazare, Antisemitism: It’s History and Causes, Translated by Britons Publishing Co., London (1967), p. 158).

      http://www.nowtheendbegins.com/blog/?cat=1541

      Jews declare themselves to be anti-White

      https://www.winterwatch.net/2016/06/the-jew-harvard-professor-noel-ignatiev-on-how-terrible-white-people-are/

      Don’t Deny Jewish History and Culture by Calling Us “White”

      Micha Danzig — Forward (New York)

      http://forward.com/scribe/355864/anti-semitism-in-america-is-nothing-new-dont-deny-jewish-history-and-cultur/

  9. Where to begin? …

    • Cultural Marxism and the Frankfurt School
    ‘1. The creation of racism offences.
    ‘2. Continual change to create confusion
    ‘3. The teaching of sex and homosexuality to children
    ‘4. The undermining of schools’ and teachers’ authority
    ‘5. Huge immigration to destroy identity.
    ‘6. The promotion of excessive drinking
    ‘7. Emptying of churches
    ‘8. An unreliable legal system with bias against victims of crime
    ‘9. Creating dependency on the state or state benefits
    ‘10. Control and dumbing down of media
    ‘11. Encouraging the breakdown of the family

    There – you can now recognise Cultural Marxism as formulated and initiated by the Frankfurt School.

    For more …

    • The Frankfurt Institute for Social Research (not the best presentation but a 4 minute summary)

    https://worldtruthvideos.website/watch/the-frankfurt-school-of-cultural-marxism_uKW6mYohra9PknM.html

    • Goy Guide To World History #4 Frankfurt School (Kevin Macdonald and E Michael Jones)

    https://www.bitchute.com/video/TdOzUGlQxCwU/

    • Cultural Decline Follows Communist Blueprint (Timothy Mathews)

    https://hwaairfan.wordpress.com/2017/05/13/cultural-decline-follows-communist-blueprint/

    • Roughly 7 pages of text, I used Ctrl+f (“find”) and searched for “jew”, there were 0 instances.
      Your campaign of random vilification goes on into the night !!!

  11. Vigano Denounces The Coronavirus Vaccine: ‘There Is a Duty To Refuse It’

    https://russian-faith.com/news-trends/vigano-denounces-coronavirus-vaccine-there-duty-refuse-it-n6163

    “Revelations from Pfizer executives have recently been released showing that the mRNA gene serums contain aborted fetal material not only for the production of the original vaccine, but also for its replication and production on a vast scale… This makes the use of these drugs absolutely immoral.” ( https://www.gotquestions.org/cannibalism-Bible.html )

    Why is a site about Russian Christianity running Covid news? We believe Covid is a major spiritual issue, a demonic attack on Christianity, enslaving mankind. Our staff are extremely well-informed about it, and can identify truly important articles, often with a Christian angle. We’ll feature Dr. Mercola, a vital voice for truth, because he is censored by our anti-Christian technocracy. – The Editor

    Vigano, who has gained worldwide admiration for chastising Catholic Church leaders over issues including the abuse of children, makes it clear that he rejects the vaccine on safety and moral grounds. Vigano calls the vaccine “absolutely immoral” and says that “there is a duty to refuse it categorically.” Vigano also strongly opposes the Joe Biden regime’s plan to vaccinate children as young as 5 years old…………………………”

C'mon Leave a Reply, Debate and Add to the Discussion

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.