Grand Jury, Segment 2: Constitution for the World, and 5G is Connected to Graphene Oxide

(L) Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, Director of WHO, Photo: DW.com (C) Astrid Stuckelberger, Photo: Amazon (R) Silvia Behrendt, Photo: Facebook

Introduction by Mary W Maxwell, LLB

GumshoeNews has already provided the beginning text of Reiner Fuellmich’s “thing.” He calls it a Grand Jury, but to me it looks like a Truth Commission. It is breathtaking and very valuable.

I am calling today’s article “segment 2” in order that Gumshoe keep its files accessible to those searching for this information. But my segments do not match up closely with Fuellmich’s package which is divided into 6 days of testimony, with 6 hours per day.

The experts today are two women who were Insiders at the WHO — Dr. Silvia Behrendt and Dr. Astrid Stuckelberger.  Their core message is that all aspect of the SARs crisis in 2002 and the Covid crisis of 2020 were part of a game by which WHO — of all people! — would become the world boss. So, legislators in all countries got into the act by changing their rules to let a WHO-declared emergency supercede their laws.

My knowledge of the law, for both US and Australia, tells me that this is not genuine, that those two nations do not have to obey. Still, it’s not for me to override this testimony so I will present it verbatim. All I will do is add bolding and abridge it.  Please recall that this text is in the public domain, at least if you follow Fuellmich’s request to read it and spread it around but not to sell it.

Note: After a lengthy talk about WHO, there are shorter talks on: hospital murders, radiation of Fukushima, and Melanie Klein psychology.  I marked these with ***** so they don’t get lost. The mention of a connection between graphene oxide and 5g is at the very end.

Now here is the text, 8400 words, which in the original is called “WHO, Third Summary”:

[Fuellmich says]: The next two expert witnesses … Dr. Silvia Behrendt and Dr. Astrid Stuckelberger, held leading positions in the World Health Organization and the United Nations. They reveal how the WHO has strategically infiltrated all the nations of the world with the purpose of abolishing democracy and imposing its own tyranny on all members of humanity.

…

What these WHO and United Nations whistleblowers expose, is that private entities created a worldwide system that allows them to use the excuse of “health emergencies of international concern” to rob humanity of all rights and freedoms, and implement a totalitarian regime, run by a financial oligarchy.

EXPERT WITNESS — DR. SILVIA BEHRENDT

Austrian lawyer… Dr. Silvia Behrendt received her PhD from the University of St. Gallen, Switzerland, on the topic of the International Health Regulations and the Executive Authority

of the World Health Organization during public health emergencies of international concern. She was a visiting researcher at Georgetown Law, under Professor Gostin, funded by the Swiss National Fund.

EXPERT WITNESS — DR. ASTRID STUCKELBERGER

…a scientist … for 25 years at the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Geneva and Lausanne (Switzerland).  She has worked with WHO on International Health Regulation (IHR) and public health emergency management between 2009 and 2013 … Publications: 12 books, over 180 publications from scientific articles to policy papers for the UN, EU or governments.

I would like to focus the attention to the fact that we are currently not confronted with a medical endemic response.  Most of the criticism raised by the scientists and doctors center around the issue that, from a pure medical perspective, all health measures recommended and required by national health authorities or WHO are actually contrary to the epidemiological and medical state of the art.

And this is so on purpose, I contend, because the underlying concept used for COVID-19 does not follow established scientific principles, but rather a different ideology which is framed as “global health security” and means to treat health as a national security issue, requiring national and global states of exceptions to deal with it.

Therefore, I consider it crucial to provide a short, historic analysis of this concept in order to understand why the current global health crisis we face is not about medical science and health in the common sense we would expect.

The progressive replacement of medical aims with political aims started in the context of emerging infectious diseases in the early 1990s and originated actually from the US…. Within a short period of time, WHO institutionalized this new approach by the rapid setup of an entirely new division called Emerging and Other Communicable Diseases. And, interestingly, they didn’t engage the staff of the Communicable Disease Control Department at that time.

This policy confirmed that the new paradigm shift from lowering the incidence of regional endemic diseases was to the sole focus on preventing the international spread in real time, and most preferably within a 24-hour time frame….

So, consequently, in 2001 there was a resolution of the Votels Assembly that’s already inserted this notable concept and called for … a definition for a public health emergency of international concern for the purpose of revising the outdated sanitary laws called International Health Regulations. [Previously] they had a very narrow scope and applicability only for yellow fever, black fever and cholera. So, at the same time, particularly in the US, bioterrorist scenario planning – we’ve already heard a lot about it – within the military and at the academic level with the most prominent exercise like Dark Winter was launched. And, interestingly, all those events “went real” shortly after that.

What is also very interesting – and we did not hear – is that not only the exercises were held, which turned into reality, also the legislation in the US was prepared to curtail civil liberties for the fight against bioterrorism from 1990 onwards. This undertaking was started by the CDC and eventually finalized by professors from Georgetown University, like Professor Gostin, together with Johns Hopkins University, and it was called the Model State Emergency Health Powers Act. [A model act is not law. It is a model that states can adopt or modify or ignore.]

So, the most important milestone in the revision process of the International Health Regulations, which is an international treaty, was the outbreak of the severe acute respiratory syndrome, abbreviated as SARS as we all know, in 2002, which was accompanied by an alerted media attention that was not proportionate to the threat of the disease, which was remarkably low.

In addition, there was a quasi-consensus among scientists that the novel SARS outbreak could have had a bioterrorist potential. This political bioterrorist framing of the SARS outbreak led to the agreement of the international community that the old sanitary laws needed to be rewritten to include bioterrorism without naming this goal officially at WHO.

So, the legal dimension of the global health security concept … is now merged into national constitutions which have never had such constitutional emergency provisions.

Then the outdated IHR provisions of disease containment were replaced to include pathogens that pose a threat to national security and require an emergency regime that enabled the irrigation [I don’t know that word — MM] of legal standards not only in terms of medical safety regulations, but also in terms of fundamental standards, freedoms and civil rights.

According to this new paradigm, endemic diseases which count for the most death do not fall under the attention of this global set of rules – which are now the standard procedure for pandemics – but only newly identified pathogens without medical treatment that therefore require an emergency licensing, as the substances are all unlicensed….

Moreover, under the threat of bioterrorism, the establishment of laboratories boosted throughout the world, as Mr. [James] Bush already explained to us. Because biological weapons are defined as weapons of mass destruction and constitute a crime under international law. The only legal pathway to lawfully undertake research and medical treatment is called “biodefense” which takes place in laboratories, as we learned.

I would like to remind that all SARS coronaviruses come under the US Category C of potential bioterrorist agents and are also classified under the expert regime of the EU for dual use. That refers to the potential of civil and military use…. And throughout all health ministries in the world, new departments are established called National Health Security departments.

As a second step, I would like to explain in more detail why the small number of atypical pneumonia cases of Wuhan in late 2019 and in the first days of 2020 were reported to WHO and soon ended up as a public health emergency of international concern….

Also, the International Health Regulations, referred to as IHR, include an all-hazards approach. Some pathogens, like any novel strain of an influenza subtype or any SARS coronavirus, are still prioritized and have to be reported within a 24-hour time limit to WHO.

The identification of this novel virus was possible because China has a very tight screening regime for respiratory diseases since the SARS outbreak in 2002. As such, it was possible for China to identify this novel pathogen. Already, on the 1st of January, WHO requested more information about the outbreak due to information by Taiwan.

On the 3rd of January, China officially notified WHO of a cluster of 44 patients, of which eleven were severely ill with pneumonia of unknown etiology after the WHO …

Reiner Fuellmich: That does not sound like a pandemic.

Silvia Behrendt: Yeah, that’s true.

… after the WHO already requested more information, and there was the closure of the Wuhan market. So, this politicization and interest of WHO at this very early stage, on the 1st of January, when only 44 people had this atypical pneumonia and 11 people suffered severely from this atypical pneumonia, is indeed an interesting aspect that should lead to some precautions about how the entire crisis started. There were no deaths reported and no international cases….

The WHO and the Director General is obliged to constitute an Emergency Committee under the IHR once such an official notification has been received. So, he’s legally obliged to constitute this Emergency Committee.

Then – now it’s becoming interesting – at the same time, Professor Drosten and others worked in Germany intensely to deliver to WHO a diagnostic test assay via the PCR method for this novel virus. And Professor Drosten was also the lead author in 2003, when the novel SARS coronavirus was identified and since then nominated as WHO expert.

His first protocol was officially delivered to WHO on the 13th of January 2020, which implied that he had, of course, worked prior to the state of submission, and WHO immediately collected his first protocol of this assay to its member States. Later, this assay was revised and finally published in the Eurosurveillance journal on the 23rd of January.

He [Drosten] also contributed to the WHO interim guidance dated on the 10th of January, and this interim guidance was published … as a part of a comprehensive package of about ten guidance documents of WHO for countries covering topics related to the management of an outbreak of the new coronavirus disease. So, on the 10th of January, WHO had a comprehensive package already published.

Reiner Fuellmich: At that time, when there were literally no cases except for the 44 cases?

Silvia Behrendt: Yes. Importantly, as any SARS coronavirus requires an official notification under the IHR, the Director General had to convene a COVID-19 Emergency Committee as a legal obligation under IHR. You can find, on the WHO website, the experts who are on this committee, and you can find their CVs there.

The first meeting was held on the 22nd of January, where the experts found no agreement whether a PHEIC – that’s the abbreviation of Public Health Emergency of International Concern that WHO uses – exists or not. And they agreed that there was no international spread … and said: “In ten days we will again meet and assess the current situation of new cases.” That happened on the 13th of January. During those ten days the cases increased 14 times, to 7,711 confirmed and even 12,167 suspected cases.

Reiner Fuellmich:

So, what had happened is that Drosten had delivered his test kit to the World Health Organization and through the use of his new test all of a sudden, we had 14 times the number of cases that existed before he used his test.

Silvia Behrendt: That’s what the documents say.

Reiner Fuellmich: What this boils down to is that the cases that they needed in order to declare a public health emergency of international concern came into existence because of the test. Is that correct?

Silvia Behrendt: At least, they needed the international transmission, and they have to diagnose it. And without diagnostic test, it’s not possible. So, the only one who gave this test assay is in the document referenced as Drosten. That’s what the documents say.

Reiner Fuellmich: Had it not been for his test, the WHO ten days later would still have maybe 500 cases, but not 14 times that many?

Silvia Behrendt: If there is no test, you cannot qualify it as the new virus. That’s the problem. The most important thing everybody should know is that the proclamation of a public health emergency of international concern is connected to vaccine manufacturing. That’s actually the most important thing any legal person or anybody should know. It’s not the pandemic. There is no legal consequence if WHO proclaims or defines a pandemic. That’s just interesting for the media. But the public health emergency is connected to the regulatory pathway for emergency use authorization.

Reiner Fuellmich:  Without a public health emergency of international concern, there cannot be any use of untested drugs like vaccines?

Silvia Behrendt: Right. Because all secondary laws – like the EU, the FDA, the US – they use the concept of the public health emergency also proclaimed by WHO.

Virginie de Araujo Recchia: I would like to confirm with you that Mr. Bill Gates put pressure on the WHO to declare a pandemic and that we know that Charité Berlin, which is linked with Drosten, has developed these tests with the financing of Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and Wellcome Trust. Can you confirm that?

Astrid Stuckelberger: What we can confirm – and that’s what I was going to explain to you – is that there is really a plan since 1999 that you can see chronologically with events that is mounting up GAVI from the Vaccine Alliance in UNICEF to start joining the United Nations, not only with UNICEF, but with the World Bank and WHO – through financing of this IFFIm, the International Financing Facility for Immunization – so, they did a trio, the triad.

At the same time in 2006 GAVI started to be a global alliance in Switzerland as a foundation. So, they registered in 2006 at the same time as they did a tripartite agreement between World Bank, WHO and GAVI to get financing from the Member States. That was the first step. Then in 2009 he registered as an international organization in Switzerland of a new type.

We have a press release signed by the Swiss government that shows that it was created specifically for Bill Gates, this international organization with total immunity [i.e., immune from lawsuit] You cannot do anything. You cannot even take him to tribunal. They do their own tribunal if they have any sort of disagreement.

From then on, he started, and we have the documents of the WHO how they created a decade, 2010-2020, a Vaccine Decade. We did the implementation, IHR implementation, because you had to teach and train the countries to be prepared. And we finished the first round in 2012, from 2009 to 2012. We received this with Georgetown University, Pretoria University, and I was with University of Geneva, and at that time, when we stopped the round, we got funds again from Japan, and suddenly it stopped. And they said there is no more funds. And we had almost a contract signed….

That’s enough proof that there is a plan. And it keeps on. I mean, he [Boll Gates] is in the SAGE group, the Strategic Expert Advisory Group. And they prepared even in 2016 an assessment report of this 2012-2020 Global Vaccine Action Plan, GVAP. And in 2016, they were very upset because they did not vaccinate the whole world. And they would take any excuse with vaccination, and they don’t talk about experimental or validated, it’s all vaccine of course. And in 2016, you can really see that they’re not happy. And Mr. GAVI Global is saying that we really have to make an effort. So, they have made a program called the Accelerator Program of Vaccines.

Reiner Fuellmich: Who received basically diplomatic immunity in 2009? Was it GAVI or was it Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation? Or was it Bill Gates personally? Or all of them?

Astrid Stuckelberger: No, it’s really GAVI Alliance Foundation. But they took away the name “Foundation” and in the agreement, it’s really GAVI, the Global Alliance for Vaccination. I can find the exact term in my paper, but it concerns really him, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

What I find out more and more is the financial mechanism of funding or receiving funds for a program. I found out again that the Swiss government, Swiss Medic, the FDA of Switzerland, had signed an agreement to provide to the Bill and Melinda Gates for his program $900,000 over three years, from 2020 to 2023….

Even the Constitution of Switzerland has a little line they have added without asking us,

which says that international law supersedes national law in the health matters.

And then you can see that in the law of epidemic that was passed in 2016 – so probably in all countries, we should check and I’m pretty sure we saw that in Canada –, there is a law of epidemics, a law of emergency that says to the country they will obey the International Health Regulation.

If a PHEIC (Public Health Emergency of International Concern) is declared, every country has to trigger immediately the mechanics of obeying.

And that’s what explains why when on 16, 17 March or in this area, the whole world locked down…  it never happened like this, ever, that suddenly the virus was everywhere. What’s happening with Omicron too. It starts in South Africa and the next day it’s all over the world.

Reiner Fuellmich: Yeah, but is there any … democratic legitimacy to these International Health Regulations? Has anyone who invented these International Health Regulations been voted into some office?  Or is it just a private enterprise by people who control the World Health Organization?

Astrid Stuckelberger: When we were teaching and training about the International Health Regulations, it was the question that came very often in: how come this is binding to Member

States? And, it was an extraordinary answer, which will explain to you how important it is to look at this new pandemic treaty now. It’s that WHO is for the moment the only United Nations agency who has a constitution.

WHO Constitution Article 21(19), 21a and 2, are binding Member States directly if they adopt the International Health Regulations. So, they don’t need to go through the whole procedure of a treaty. That’s why it’s very dangerous. This WHO Constitution is like if it was planned to supersede all constitutions of the world. Because why would you use the word “constitution”?

And the answers of the lawyers from WHO was always, “Oh, we have adopted it at the General Assembly of 2005 under the WHO Constitution, Article 21a and Article 2”.

Reiner Fuellmich: Yeah, but those people who created the International Health Regulations have not been voted into their positions, they have no authority. Or is there any connection between the Member States people and these International Health Regulations, or is there only the Constitution which they themselves invented?

Astrid Stuckelberger: Well, let me explain the mechanics of the United Nations – and it’s with all the big agencies like the International Labor Office, the ITU telecommunication, for the refugee. Every year you have a world assembly, like an NGO [non-governmental organization].  A world health assembly every year takes place in the United Nations in Geneva in May, the third week of May, where all Member States have their little seat and they are all together and they have an agenda and they decide about the agenda of the world together.

But normally, if there is a big decision, they are just children of the United Nations General Assembly. So, they should go up to the General Assembly and it has to get the blessing of the Secretary General, which is the head of the United Nations, which should give a blessing to WHO. I don’t see this in the case of International Health Regulations, if that’s a clue. [Yes! a clue!]

Silvia Behrendt: Well, I’d just add to this that the International Health Regulations … we started with an international treaty that dates back to the sanitary conventions of 1850. So, it’s one of the oldest international legal regimes which were taken over to WHO and which were recognized under the WHO constitution.

They already [in the 1990s?] had in mind that they wanted to have a regulatory fast track regime. So, they had this regulatory process that says that under the regulations for sanitary, which is now pandemic laws… , you have the Member States that need to opt out and not opt in. So, by the resolution that is passed, the international treaty has to enter into force in the Member State, otherwise it has to opt out on purpose. So, it’s the reverse process of international law. And that’s a very unique thing. And I think no other international organization has this ….

It’s democratic because it was an intergovernmental negotiation process. And the interesting thing is that only because of the emergence of SARS, they had this new ideology adapted from the “global health security” idea that not the endemic diseases are devastating to the people, but only new diseases that have no medical treatment. [Ivermectin, anyine?]

So, they inserted this new concept in the old laws that were already existent at WHO and existent in the world. So, they adopted this totally new ideology. And that’s the very striking thing we have now. And it’s passed as a resolution. And it is interesting that it’s an international treaty and WHO is not a party, it’s only bound by the resolution. Whereas other international treaties, like the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, the WHO is a signatory. So that’s an international law, not a treaty.

Reiner Fuellmich: I still don’t understand. I don’t see any connection between myself, my countrymen and these International Health Regulations.

Silvia Behrendt: That’s a problem with all international law.

Reiner Fuellmich: Well, not really. I think this is quite unique.

Silvia Behrendt: Member States gave their consent in 2005. They all said they wanted to have this new kind of rules for international law, and now they are obliged to implement it nationally. Or since 2007, it entered into force, and they are obliged to implement it. And for example, Austria, I’m living in Austria, we have no emergency clause in our Constitution, and we did not adopt our sanitary laws, our epidemiology laws. There is no clause of emergency, and you still have the same regime.

Astrid Stuckelberger: It’s the same with the millennium development goals and sustainable development goals, which seem to match 2000 to 2015, 2015 to 2030, the sustainable development goals.

They’re doing a whole mechanism around this,and it becomes more and more obscure.

And it is more and more obscure how much us, as citizens, really decide. And we don’t decide anything anymore because it becomes so complex and obscure. [Bullseye!]

Reiner Fuellmich: We definitely have to take our sovereignty back. That is the conclusion that I draw from this, because even if the EU wants to come up with a new law, for example, they can decide that they want to introduce these laws, but unless the Member States ratify it in their own countries, it doesn’t become law in their countries. So, this is quite surprising to me, and I think to many lawyers who should know about these things, as well. This is very disturbing.

Silvia Behrendt: And in the EU they have created this HERA agency, which is the same, but probably much more coercive. And that’s a huge, huge problem.

They have no authority in health matters, but they still pretend to have it and still create the agencies and instruct on us, without democratic processes.

Reiner Fuellmich: HERA stands for Health Emergency Response Agency, right?

Silvia Behrendt: Yes.

Reiner Fuellmich: And isn’t there a rumor that: if our national Member State governments in the EU collapse, then they’re going to take over and under the EU Commission, there will be a kind of a mini world government. Does it sound plausible?

Silvia Behrendt: I have no idea, but I’m sure they would love to.

Astrid Stuckelberger: Yeah, that’s the idea of this pandemic treaty [which Africa put paid to, I think] .  Because this pandemic treaty has articles at the end to say that with the constitution of WHO we don’t need any other constitution as Member States.

Not only do they diminish the power of Member States, but they have invited a whole lot of non- state actors – NGOs, GAVI, intergovernmental. Bill and Melinda Gates might be an NGO, and then they make different things. The Rockefeller Foundation, I’ve met them in WHO, they come and sit in meetings, and they are NGO, we don’t know what they are.

Reiner Fuellmich: So, the non-state actors are also invited in this new treaty, which would take over literally, through the WHO Constitution – a world constitution – because of “pandemic.”

So ultimately what we’re looking at is private associations, private individuals even, taking over our national governments through the World Health Organization, using health as a crowbar to do whatever they want.

Astrid Stuckelberger: Yeah, we could say that. You can see it through the financing because GAVI and private partners have started to invade and interfere the whole United Nations. I actually looked into this because I was called to organize for Switzerland the whole United Nations Open Days for two days. I learned a lot about an organization that nobody hears about, which is really a private entity, called the UN Global Compact.

The United Nations Global Compact is only private sector. They can, for example, finance – I mean, it’s open to partnerships.

Silvia Behrendt: Also, the implementation of the International Health Regulations is very strange because it’s done by termed external evaluations undertaken by the Global Health Security Agenda. And if you look at the page of the website of the Global Health Security Agenda, it says it has a private consortium, …these external evaluators go to Germany, and to every country. It’s even on the website of the RKE (Richardson Kontogouris Emerson LLP) applauding how great it is.

But they don’t say it’s implemented by private entities. You don’t know. I don’t want to have laws implemented by private entities. That’s absolutely undemocratic. And they’re very proud of it. They’re very proud of it.

Reiner Fuellmich: That’s bizarre.

Virginie de Araujo Recchia: If I understand well, there are private advisers who’re working also

with the WHO, like McKenzie, Censure, they are an arm of the Bill Gates Foundation also?

Astrid Stuckelberger: Yeah, it’s a good question. I’ve actually looked for the link McKenzie and WHO because we know that they are creating the communication. And I think they have been putting it under something they’re setting up now, an intergovernmental panel. What is the exact title? Intergovernmental Negotiating Network, something like that. This just happened at the executive board. So, it is a bit worrying because I think that all those communication agencies are buried into that. They’re not the only one.

Viviane Fischer: So, what is this treaty adding to the situation that we have right now?

Silvia Behrendt: … Probably the fiercest proponent is Charles Michel. He suggested the European Union wants this treaty…. If they are rushing into a treaty, only a small number of signatories will sign. And the IHR is a universally acknowledged tool. And we did not mention that it would actually have good aspects in it which are neglected and infringed:

it has human rights implementation clause, which is not respected, absolutely violated.

The Director General is a very huge proponent of this treaty because he’s very political, in a way. And it’s very, very strange what kind of intentions are behind that.

And it’s called for “preparedness and response.” So, what we know is that they invented a new procedure, which is also problematic. It’s called WHO Emergency Use Authorization.

That’s where Big Pharma can go to WHO and say “I’m inventing a new pharmaceutical or new diagnostic set for this public health emergency. We would like you to put it

on your list,”. And then WHO puts it on the list and has a disclaimer saying that there’s no warranty and no endorsement of WHO, and if somebody dies, it’s not WHO’s fault, it’s only a list.

And then GAVI takes this list and says, “Oh, we can export it to the entire world…. That’s what they do in the treaties of GAVI and this vaccine alliance, this COVAX facility it’s called, the third pilar of this ACT accelerator. … It’s actually a treaty of private international law, not of public international law because the problem of customer international law is not recognized. It’s a norm that there are no medical treatments whatsoever without your consent, which you cannot derogate from. So, yeah, it’s a huge problem.

Reiner Fuellmich: So, we’ve learned tonight, from all the other experts… that, for example, in the UK, healthcare has been largely privatized. It’s being controlled by private groups, private charities…. Even their psychiatric system has been privatized. There are private people behind all of this, and this is how they control everything.

They even create their own future leaders next to what the World Economic Forum is doing, meaning they have their own people who they then seem to be telling what to do in positions of power in the governments.

Now, if I look at the WHO, there’s a man by the name of Tedros, he’s the Director General. Who is he? I have read in the papers that in his own country, a criminal complaint has been filed against him for genocide.

Is that the typical, let’s say, puppet that the private entities who are running the healthcare show are using to further their aims?

Astrid Stuckelberger: No, I must say I’ve never seen a Director General like that. I’ve known many. But I know also from inside that the staff was very unhappy with him, and they asked for his resignation. And of course, it never happened. Another scoop, if I did not say this already, is that on the board of GAVI Foundation, you can see the names of people who have been part of GAVI. Well, Tedros has been part of GAVI before he was the elected Director General. Conflict of interest. He was on the board between 22 January 2009 and September 2011.

The other person with conflict of interest, the President of Ireland, who was at the head of the Human Rights Commission. And I know her, but I’m very surprised that she was there … from November 2008 to September 2011.

Reiner Fuellmich: So, wherever you look, you see conflicts of interest.

Astrid Stuckelberger: I would just want to add something that might be interesting legally. There are, in the annex in the notes at the end of this International Health Regulation of 2005, two countries who made reservations that they don’t agree with that completely, because they want to apply their global security nationally…. It’s the US and Iran. So, it’s interesting to see that two countries have managed to put a reservation to this. How come the others haven’t?

Reiner Fuellmich: It’s because their people haven’t spoken. But they will.

*****[HOSPITAL MURDERS]

Debbie Evans: I just wanted to mention very quickly when you mentioned about the UK, we’ve also got a serious issue going on here with the unvaccinated in that anybody that seems to be admitted to hospital with a COVID-19 positive test would appear to be put on an end-of-life, accelerated end of life care plan. Patients seem to be given midazolam and morphine. And this is without their consent. This is without their families’ consent. These decisions are made by the clinicians alone.

So, I just want to be sure to include the victims of this absolute disaster that are unvaccinated. And also, just to bring your attention to CEPI. CEPI was founded in 2017, and CEPI and GAVI

worked financially very closely together. When CEPI was launched in 2017, Bill Gates at the World Economic Forum launch said that they would be cutting out the safety with regards to clinical trials. He said it straight out and it was actually featured on UK Column news.

Bill Gates said that the safety data and manufacturing would be cut out, which would enable the 100-day mission to go ahead to have vaccines rolled out within 100 days of the World Health Organization declaring a pandemic….

We also have Wellcome Leap, which Whitney has got a lot of information about when it comes to bioweapons and making biochemicals. And also, I just want to go back to the patent as well, because the Rothschild’s patent of 2015, if you look at the full paper, everything that we’re seeing today was put into that and it was approved in 2020, but it was given priority in 2015. So, it was written in 2015.

So that together with SPARS pandemic – and SPARS pandemic 2025-2028 was a coronavirus, and some of the names are the same as in the Johns Hopkins futuristic scenario, like CORAVAX. There’s an awful lot of similarities there….

About Lock Step … I just want to remind people that SPARS Pandemic 2025-2028 gives a month-by-month breakdown. And if you look at when we first started in March, when we have the first case in our country anyway, or in December in Wuhan, it literally goes month-by-month.  So, the prediction going forward would appear to be antimicrobial resistance, which is already what is written in SPARS. And we’re finding many people in this country not being able to access antibiotics and GPs and physicians here not wanting to give antibiotics. So, I just wanted to throw that in. Thank you.

Reiner Fuellmich: So, we do have lots of reason to worry about our sovereignty, not the least of one is the World Health Organization’s International Health Regulations. That seems to be the overarching theme … to gain control over the rest of the world including, of course, all 196 Member States.  Is this a correct assessment?

Silvia Behrendt: Yeah, at least, I think, because in the first part of my expertise, I trust that the military aspects were included in this agenda but were not named. That’s the reason why we have now a “pandemic” response, which is not medical, which is unproportionate and political and we do not realize it….

They included this bioterrorist scenario, and they adapted the language to global health security – that’s also the Center for Civilian Biodefence. Also, at the time of Dark Winter, it was called Johns Hopkins Global Health Security Center. Center for Civilian Biodefence, I think, was the correct name. And they had also a journal called Bioterrorism or Biodefense, and now it’s called Global Health Security. So, we should not forget about that a bio war could go on, at least, so it’s much more political, as the politicians would themselves agree.

Astrid Stuckelberger: I will add two points. One, we should worry about the whole United Nations because the Sustainable Development Goals are 17 goals and 169 targets. It’s the Agenda 2030, and it is all entangled, especially with the climate change, for example. But there are many other mechanisms. The second is the UN alliance for SDG Financing. What is this? When you dig, you find a lot of things, very mysterious, that we have to find out…. A public health emergency of international concern has four typologies. That’s what we should do with what’s going on now, because we’re all focused on the biological factor. But in fact, the first one is infections biology. The second is food-borne biology. And there’s a whole organization behind that, called INFOSAN. The third is chemical, and chemical is mercury, it can be metal, etc. And there was one expert, Kasten Gutschmit, a German that I was inviting, and he was always making great reports but very difficult to find the experts there.

And the fourth … is radio nuclear radiation and that’s even more difficult to find experts…. The International Atomic Energy Agency based in Vienna … are experts on radio nuclear, Chernobyl, Fukushima. They are the first in line there.

***** [RADIATION: FUKUSHIMA]

What I was shocked about, is when we were doing the case studies of Fukushima, we asked them what did WHO do? And they said “WHO was not allowed to access Fukushima.” They were refused the visa because the first one to be there is the IAEA, International Atomic Energy Agency. What is very strange is that they have an agreement which gives them power over WHO.

I went to look at what they’re doing now with covid, just today. I’m very scared to tell you, that they are in charge of the RT-PCR kit. They are independent from the United Nations, they have their own international treaty, and they report to the UN General Assembly and to the Social Security Council. This is for nukes, it’s for a radio nuclear threat, which could kill the whole planet.

So, they say that the IAEA has developed a nuclear derived diagnostic technology that can help detect and identify covid or anything else in humans and in animals. They have developed this test. And this test is very efficient, the RT-PCR, because it’s polymerized chain reaction and rapid test and they think they are the experts, especially for Ebola, Zika and the African swine fever virus. So, just today I read this, and for me it rings a bell because they are offering now the test kit, a PCR test kit and their lab. They’re linked to labs and that’s where the power lies….

Reiner Fuellmich: …This harkens back to the theme which we heard about first today, about how the City of London, basically Big Finance, is controlling everything through their emissaries. They’re private people trying to gain control over the rest of the world. Again, we have to take back our sovereignty.  That is what all of this tells me right now.

Astrid Stuckelberger: And maybe also look at all the NGOs, because in WHO there’s the World Alliance of Hospitals, the World Alliance of the alliances of alliances. And a lot of British people are in charge. You have to also know that a lot of militaries are there because the CDC in the US was formerly military. [Origially the CDC was private Rockefeller, I think.] [We must] disentangle those WANGO, it’s the world NGOs or the Bingo, the business and industry of NGOs because there are the mechanics, where it’s very difficult to find them, and they have a lot of power more than we think.

Reiner Fuellmich: The people have to learn that they have to disconnect and start grassroots democracy, look into their regions and their communities.They know best what’s good for them….

Silvia Behrendt: Well, my personal view is that WHO just realized they don’t need a pandemic definition anymore because everything that is needed is a PHEIC, a public health emergency of international concern….

Lawyers are always looking for this pandemic definition, but there are no legal consequences linked to the definition of a pandemic. But there’s a huge legal consequence if the Director General takes his authority and proclaims the public health emergency of international concern.

Astrid Stuckelberger: But I could just add that there are many scientific definitions they have changed, not only “pandemic.” They have changed the definition of “health professionals,” it’s everybody. They have changed “data privacy,” there is no data privacy anymore. They have not made ethics, for example, in communication in the International Health Regulations implementation course – and you have to do it, it’s to reassure people that “we don’t know, we are looking for something, you will know what is going on”, and step by step you keep people informed. And there it was, fear right away. Not only this was a psychological operation for that fear, that constant fear with cases, with images, with deaths – that were not deaths, because we know today there is not more mortality in 2020 – but also with contradictions, that we said before.

***** [“MELANIE KLEIN PSYCHOLOGY”]

And this is in Melanie Klein psychology. You make psychotic people and children when you say “I love you but I hate you”, and you push or you say “I love you and I hate you” at the same time with behavior. So, they made a very crazy nonsense of coherence, no control, no sense of control. It’s also another concept in psychology. They make people totally insecure, which diminishes their immunity, by the way.

What they also did psychologically, they took away all the religions and all the belief systems. This is something that keeps people up, and they censored religion, they censored death. They forbid the ritual of death, which is one of the most important rituals if you want to have a good grief, development, coherence and healing.

So, there are many things they have done, not just this manipulation. They reversed completely the values. And this is a bit of this Melanie Klein psychotic. I call it the Hansel and Gretel Syndrome because “I love you; I’m going to give you this, I’m going to be ethical, we are going to treat you well with the vaccine” and they’re killing them….

Reiner Fuellmich: One thing for certain: this is not about health.

Debbie Evans: In 2002, Professor Ferguson modelled 50,000 deaths would happen in the UK from mad cow disease. And he modelled it completely incorrectly, where we saw the burning of all our cattle for 150 deaths. So, he was very incorrect.

We were very surprised in the UK when we found out that Neil Ferguson was responsible

for the modelling of this [Covid] pandemic, because he was so incorrect in the last one.

Reiner Fuellmich: … It’s incredible how many completely incompetent people

are kept in office, obviously, by the people who put them there – those super rich people who somehow seem to be fueled and kept alive through the City of London and its fifth columns that seem to be everywhere in the world.

End of session 2 of the Grand Jury criminal investigation.

CONCLUSION

PRIVATE ENTITIES TAKE OVER THE WORLD

[Fuellmich]: … Essentially, they revive the ancient practice of slavery, where humans are literally owned by rich masters. During this revival of slavery, the systems of enslavement have been greatly upgraded and enhanced, for the purpose of effectively enslaving the entire human race.

One of the true motivations behind the DNA altering vaccines, that are being imposed on all of humanity, is to genetically engineer mankind with a view to create a “new model of human” that will perfectly obey these oligarchs.

More evidence of this transhumanist agenda is revealed on StopWorldControl.com. We are currently preparing a documentary that features dozens of video clips of these criminals, publicly discussing how, for example, 5G will insert thoughts and emotions into the population to ensure complete obedience. Make sure to sign up to our emails to be informed about the release of this upcoming documentary, as well as other critical productions.

As the editor of these Grand Jury Summaries, I would like to add that besides the City of London and Washington DC, there is a third powerhouse in this world that operates at an even higher level: Vatican City State…. It is in Vatican City State that some of the most powerful puppet masters reside.

This brings us to the very heart of the matter, which is that ultimately, the driving force of this evil is not just money, but a dark spiritual dimension, that hates humanity and our Creator, and desires to destroy our world. It’s typical that these dark forces are served by those claiming to serve God. Hiding behind masks is how these criminals always operate.

WHAT IS THE SOLUTION?

The answer to all of this is to inform as many people as possible in the first place, because the power of the elite is entirely based on the complete ignorance of the masses. Once a certain number of people become aware of this worldwide criminal enterprise, the resistance will become too powerful to suppress….

As we have seen, the main strategy of the criminal oligarchs is mind control and psychological propaganda. This has been going on for many decades. One of their focusses has been to disconnect humanity from our Creator, by telling us there is no such thing as a higher source of life.

The interesting thing is that the very entities who have pushed this mindset in our societies are very spiritual themselves, as they are engaged in dark occult practices. A well-known whistleblower from the financial elite is Ronald Bernard, who was moving billions of euros for the top financial elite. He was offered to not only move this money, but to actually own it himself. The requirement was however disturbing: he had to bury his conscience. Ronald Bernard found out that most of the people at the top of this financial elite are involved in a religion called Luciferianism. They invited him to participate in the practice of ritual abuse and murder of children (satanic ritual abuse or SRA). He learned that this is the prerequisite for partaking in the immense levels of wealth and power….

This is also a well-known method for getting people under the control of the criminal overlords: people of influence are invited to partake in acts of sexual perversion, mostly the molesting of children, which is then videotaped and used for the rest of their life to keep them under the control of the criminal elite. This practice of blackmailing is well-documented. It’s the number 1 method the elite use to control entire governments.

HEROES OF HUMANITY

The challenge for all who read this is to no longer hide our heads in the sands of denial, but to be courageous in acknowledging the realities that are now being exposed all over the world. Ignoring these horrors equals complicity. We may not abandon the children who are suffering under the cruel claws of these inhumane monsters who consider themselves to be ‘the elite’ who ‘own humanity’ and who can therefore abuse anyone as they please. We need to face this evil head on. The world is in need of heroes, who will stand up and do whatever it takes to stop this cruel reign of satanic oligarchs.

My final request is therefore that all who read this document, will go out of their way to share it far and wide. You can order as many printed copies as you want, to hand out in your community, or send to all who are in a position of influence in your community. You can also send the PDF version by email to local governments, law enforcement, churches, schools, hospitals, media, judges and lawyers, etc. Please stand up for the sake of humanity.

If we let these psychopaths – because that’s what they are – continue with their insane operations, the world will be destroyed.

RESOURCES

Make sure to check out the following critical resources that reveal far more about the criminal entities who are planning to enslave all of humanity. These resources provide more insight , which empowers you to resist their plans and help build a better world of freedom, goodness and truth.

MONOPOLY

A brilliant and blazingly eye-opening documentary that anyone should watch in this context, is called MONOPOLY – Who Owns the World? This film shows all the evidence of how virtually everything in our world is owned by a very small group of superrich people. Many praised this documentary as a must-see for all of humanity, and one of the best documentaries of all time.

Monopoly can be viewed here: StopWorldControl.com/monopoly

THE FALL OF THE CABAL

This is the best resource in the world to learn more about who these criminal oligarchs are and what kind of crimes they have been committing for centuries. There are two series: the original Fall of the Cabal, which exposes the unspeakable horrors inflicted on humanity – and especially on the children. The Sequel continues with more information about who they are, what kind of organizations they are running….

Watch The Fall of the Cabal here: StopWorldControl.com/cabal

RONALD BERNARD

Watch Ronald Bernard here: StopWorldControl.com/bernard

VACCINE DEATH REPORT

The Vaccine Death Report is the world’s most comprehensive and detailed report showing the unspeakable destruction caused by the experimental gene therapy which is falsely marketed as vaccines. Millions of people have died already, and hundreds of millions are disabled for life. And this is only the first short-term wave of devastation. In the long term the effects will be beyond anyone’s imagination. This is truly the worst assault on the human race of all time.

Download The Vaccine Death Report here: StopWorldControl.com/report

AGE OF CYBORGS

One of the most concerning realities revealed during this Grand Jury is how the oligarchs are planning to submit all of humanity to an unprecedented system of complete control over our minds and emotions…. 5G plays a key role in this, as well as graphene oxide, that is added to vaccines, drinking water, chem trails, food, dietary supplements, women’s products, diapers, etc. Once the public is sufficiently saturated with graphene oxide, they can be controlled through 5G. Sign up to our free emails to stay informed about this upcoming documentary, and to also receive more critical intel that helps you defend your life.

Sign up here: StopWorldControl.com