Introduction by Dee McLachlan
A brief court update about R v Pridgeon, O’Dea & Ors and R v Paul Robert Burton & R v Andrew Katelaris.
This coming Friday (11 August, 2023) Pastor Paul Burton will address the court on the corruption of the child stealing operations within government — and how the courts protect the department heads. I would suggest anyone in or near Newcastle attend the local court from 9.30 am.
By Pastor Paul Robert Burton
DPP v Paul Robert Burton & DPP v Andrew Katelaris
After over six years subjected to the harsh rigours of the judicial system I am happy to inform all that Dr Andrew Katelaris and I finally have our Committal hearing on August 11th in Newcastle local court from 9.30am.
The Committal is under the old rules and we will be exposing DOCS/FACS/DCJ and how the child in our case was removed without delegated authority and on known false grounds and how these child removal departments commit fraud upon the court and how the court appears to condone these actions hence enabling the government to traffic and abuse children.
The government has spent six years and millions of dollars of tax payers money to hide their malfeasance in this case.
The child was aboriginal and the genocide of the indigenous and the removal of their children is continuing today right under all our noses. We are surrounded by charlatans and false prophets everywhere, many of us can no longer tell truth from fiction.
Our own Government is directly involved in a now 8.5 billion dollar national child trafficking and child abuse industry, hidden from the public through secrecy and the use of laws that purport to protect the privacy and identity of children but in reality they protect the privacy and identity of the abusers of children.
“The very word secrecy is repugnent in a free and open society” – JFK
Until the government stops ripping children for profit from families that clearly love them we will never ever be able to fix this situation because the emotional impacts are deep seated, inter generational, and often irreversible. Please consider supporting us by attending in person and remember the powerful words of Martin Luther King Junior.
“History will have to record that the greatest tragedy of this period of social transition was not the strident clamor of the bad people, but the appalling silence of the good people. Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. We are caught in an inescapable network of mutuality, tied in a single garment of destiny. Whatever affects one directly, affects all indirectly. He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it. He who accepts evil without protesting against it is really cooperating with it.”
Martin Luther King, Jr.
Wow, Dee. Wow, Pastor Paul. Any interested person – AND EVERYONE IS NECESSARILY ‘INTERESTED’ — can download my new book here, which is largely about the O’Dea and Pridgeon case and buckets of judicial malfeasance,
(Is there any non-malfeasant court these days? Let me know if you see one.)
Come on, read this damn thing. Or buy your Dad a copy for Father’s day at Amazon, $US 12.50. And go to Newcastle, a 2-hour train ride from Steak and Kidney on this Friday Aug 11 at 9:30am for Pastor Paul’s hearing.
https://gumshoenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Society_Is_the_Authority.pdf
Contact me if you wish at MaxwellMaryLLB@gmail.com. Thanks!
A very good commentary and a damning indictment for Elbow Gump and his stupid PR circus. Our horrible over-servicing governments get worse and worse the more you know.
As for going to Newcastle, everyone in Sydney should welcome any excuse to head out for at least a day.
https://veaterecosan.blogspot.com/search?q=child+abduction
So 5 ½ years after the MSM-sensationalised Prigeon-O’Dea arrests there’ll finally be a trial ?
So how many times has it been postponed now?
The reason being??
Interesting to note what transpired a mere month after the flash-in-the-pan media splurge:
https://www.sydneycriminallawyers.com.au/blog/not-guilty-on-all-charges-an-interview-with-medicinal-cannabis-crusader-dr-andrew-katelaris/
That win took pace in November 2018
At which point the malicious prosecution against him and Burton was already 15 months old!
“KATELARIS: Until I witnessed first-hand the draconian methodology employed by FACS to seize children from loving and devoted parents, under demonstrably false pretensions, I could not accept that such practices were taking place in Australia.
Since then, it has become obvious to me that such behaviour is in fact commonplace. This gives NSW the dubious distinction of having one of the highest per capita seizure rates in the world.
Having met several parents of seized children and seeing their utter despondency at the injustices that have befallen their families, doing nothing was not an option.
Section 105 of the CYPCPA is a grotesque abuse of legislative power and in conflict with the values of open government.Burton: Three of the ten charges against me were dropped and two of the five against Andrew were.
These related to alleged breaches of orders made under the Court Suppression and Non-Publication Orders Act 2010 (NSW). The orders had been made during a closed Children’s Court hearing in May 2017.
The copy of that order provided in evidence against us contained no time and place element. However, these elements are essential for an order to be valid.
I made an application for the transcript from the Children’s Court, as it was essential to our defence, and I also requested copies of all the documents they’d suppressed, as they claimed we released medical information about the child.
This process took about one year, and I had to appeal the matter to the NSW Supreme Court to get all that information. So, I’m saying the DPP deliberately withheld information essential to our defence.
Then, once I had that information, I spoke with a very good friend who is a fruit picker from Griffith. In my opinion, this friend knows more about common law and criminal law than anyone I have ever met.
I was then able to find a rarely used tort, that being collateral abuse.
The DPP was still proceeding with the charges, even when I made them aware that they were doomed to fail. I went on to file a collateral abuse statement of claim against the DPP, whilst the criminal matter was still afoot.
That statement of claim was ultimately struck out in the District Court, so I appealed that matter to the Court of Appeal.
I appeared before three judges and my appeal was upheld, and the matter was sent back to the District Court.
Shortly after this, the DPP dropped the three charges against me and the two against Andrew, as the Court of Appeal had ruled that those orders were invalid.
Once the charges were dropped, I discontinued the collateral abuse claim. I then filed a malicious prosecution against the two senior public officers responsible for maliciously and vexatiously prosecuting both Dr Andrew and myself.
BURTON: Firstly, I’ve committed no crime, and have never ever knowingly breached any court orders or legislation. So, I would never plead guilty to something that I have not done.
I was aware, along with thousands of other people on social media, that the removal of the child was unlawful, as the reasons stated for the child’s forced and violent removal were known to be untrue, and yet, FACS still removed the child.
The child, the child’s family and many other people, including myself, were violently assaulted.
The child was at risk of significant harm, not because of the family, friends or supporters, but because of the poor decisions of FACS caseworkers, who often make decisions to remove children that are not evidence-based and without judicial oversight.
This removal was a warrantless removal under section 43 of the CYPCPA. With all warrantless removals in NSW, the FACS secretary has a responsibility under that same act – section 45 – to provide the court with reasons for that warrantless removal.
This is not occurring in the NSW Children’s Court. Children are being removed without a warrant or explanation and consequentially without any true judicial oversight.
Further to this, the NSW Children’s Court president Peter Johnstone has himself said that he approves around 99 percent of all cases before him.
That is, the court merely accepts FACS submissions and parents have, in my view, next to no hope of getting their children back, with the emotional impacts being disastrous.
Judicial officers claim to be creatures of statute. Yet, we find clear and defined examples in the closed Children’s Court, where these statutory obligations are not being fulfilled.
Not only with section 45, but also in regard to the making of suppression orders and the courts duty to inform other interested parties.
We have been criminally charged for offences relating to orders made in a closed Children’s Court, and we, of course, knew nothing of what occurred in that closed court.
We are in a position where that evidence has to come out from the closed court into the open criminal jurisdiction to attempt to prove the case against us.
We hope this will help shed some much-needed light onto what’s hiding behind those closed doors.
FACS has now been merged with Justice to form the NSW Department of Communities and Justice. The secretary of that department now has far reaching powers over FACS, public housing, the police, court administration, prisons, Legal Aid, youth justice, and the fire service.
This draconian overreach of power has dire consequences for a system already in crisis.
And although our court matters are in NSW, they raise significant constitutional arguments at law that are essential to protecting any semblance of a democracy.
The child in question and his family came to me for spiritual counsel and support when they were being persecuted by Child Protection in Queensland. And they went to Dr Andrew for his skills and support.
This child is how we met. And we both clearly shared the same view that the government department charged with the responsibility to protect children from risk of harm, in reality, was causing significantly more harm to that family.
And lastly, FACS and the courts often publicly acknowledge that the families caught in this judicial process love their children.
If a parent loves their child, they should not have their child forcibly removed or denied near all contact. This is like torture and destroys families and their lives and the trauma is often irreversible.
Child removals should be an absolute last resort in genuine situations of children clearly being harmed, not something decided by largely unskilled caseworkers with minimal qualifications.
This leads to a situation where the system profits from removals of children and does not profit from helping families stay together.”
https://www.sydneycriminallawyers.com.au/blog/suing-the-dpp-and-facs-an-interview-with-paul-robert-burton-and-dr-andrew-katelaris/
YouTube sent this to me unsolicited. Re Intellectuals and pedophiles. I have not yet watched it.
The baby boomers think they invented sexy stuff in 1967 but it’s older than that
new AFP cleanup, reported in US last night:
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/child-sex-abuse-australia-arrests-fbi-agents-murder-rcna98707?fbclid=IwAR1qxmRtCIuwnZbunFXvMuCHj7wkCWEVOxq5oWv6c4jSvMYySwH_zGuKtsE_aem_AQEDPyfTPKESGa2AkKj67dXaih3rK7hAH7afh0kmGelVim0USluIyPlgGDGcscqyLi4
“The Australian suspects are between the ages of 32 to 81 years old, the federal police agency said. So far, two have been sentenced, it said.”
But they haven’t been named because ?
Quite apart from which such reports do nothing but lull the populace into complacency re government engendered abuse – the very issue on which the Burton/Katelaris case is based
Brainwashed minds simply don’t want to deal with truth, thinking no one can do such perverted evil, only because demons loaded have con-vinced many that satan doesn’t exist.
With Covid they’ve even conned parents to engage in child sacrifice by requiring youth to get poisonous jabs, compromising their immune systems. We can clearly see that the pedophiliac psychopath elite are rolling out their bloody carpet for the antichrist.
Pray for redemption and if you can support these good people trying to raise truth to surface through the courts system, no matter how difficult, may Our Lord give them strength to battle the demons in high places of juidiciary.
I feel like donating $2 to that poor fellow who calls himself “Pastor Paul” so he could buy some scissors to make his receding hair less disagreeable. All the women that I know who gladly accept that well ordered hair is an adornment that many women prise is proper and attractive.
Myself being a grumpy old man for a pretty long time would have to agree that poofy-looking Aquarian “New Agers” do not inspire young men and women to embrace their role in the human economy.