by Mary W Maxwell, LLB
The term “conspiracy theorists” encompasses 21st century people who think that some as-yet-unidentified individuals, or “officials” in general, conspire to do things for their own benefit that often harms the public.
I have been a conspiracy theorist since 2005. I did not join this field for its entertainment value (though it contains fascinating stuff, and some folks get addicted to it). I am in it because I want to know who is doing what. And if someone is harming me, I want to take action against them, especially legal action.
I see you smirking. You assume I can never succeed in that endeavor, as the “elite few” have got ways of controlling information, not to mention ways of removing whistleblowers or eye witnesses from the earth. It’s true. Their abilities are pretty overwhelming.
In fact, in any conflict between a moral-minded party and a ruthless party, the deck is hugely stacked against a fair or honest outcome. Mathematically “that’s just how it is, Folks.” Bad wins over good, unless some unusual factor enters into the relationship.
Presenting a New (Or Old) Legal Weapon
Law in the English-speaking world has been developing for over a millennium. At times, it has come to be accepted that certain principles rise up over other legal “doctrines” or procedures. These higher principles are called “law maxims.”
I wish we could say that such maxims have a “right of priority” similar to the way we Americans refer to our Constitution’s higher validity compared to statutes. We refer to the Constitution as being “the supreme law of the land.”
Well, never mind. The law maxims simply don’t have a heritage like that, technically. But it is possible in any particular matter to argue that the idea contained in the maxim knocks a law from its perch. The parliamentarian who wrote the statute about such-and-such an activity was probably considering how that law would apply in specific situations. The inventor of a maxim is usually a person who was reviewing human interactions over a long time.
Here are some law maxims from past centuries. (Note: Many maxims are in Latin but that does not mean they came from Roman law.)
- Evil deeds ought not to remain unpunished, for impunity affords continual excitement to the delinquent. Impunitas semper deteriora invitat.
- Paternal power should consist in affection, not in atrocity.
- You are not considered to have consented if you acted under a mistake. Non videntur qui errant consentire.
- To a judge who exceeds his office or jurisdiction no obedience is due. Judici officium suum excedenti non paretur. [Well, son of a gun!]
- No one is bound to arm his adversary. [Don’t build his 5G’s.]
- By no contract can one effect that a fraud should be maintained. Nulla pactine effici potest et dolus praestetur.
- When laws imposed by the state fail, we must act by the law of nature. Lex spectat naturae ordinem.
- An evil custom is to be abolished. Malus usus est abolendus.
— and so forth. There are hundreds of maxims.
Contra Spoliatorem, Omnia Praesumuntur
This article celebrates a maxim that may come in very handy today. As anyone can see, the authorities in our society, including the courts, have much scope for hiding evidence. Thus the guilty go free. Top dogs are easy to protect; they need only have a friend in the document room.
This maxim says “You can presume the guilt of the one who is doing the suppression of evidence.” Wow, the table are turned! As soon as, say, the FBI announces “We lost that piece of evidence,” the ‘omnia praesumuntur” team can come riding in.
Contra spoliatorem, omnia praesumuntur – Against the spoliator, everything can be presumed.
“The FBI” should be declared guilty. Wait, maybe the losing of the evidence was a genuine error or accident. Hmm. Too bad, guys. Whoever first formulated this maxim did know that there would be accidents and errors now and then. But that maxim-inventor was doing what maxim-inventors do – using the sweep of historical experience.
He was saying, deliberately: “We don’t have to accept the story about the accidental loss of the knife, the diamond, the DNA, or whatever it was. Our common sense tells us these guys are covering for the guilty party. We hereby accuse them of the crime.”
You may wish to water down the guilt of the FBI, in that example, and make the FBI employees culpable only for telling the lie about the loss of the item. I guess that would work. Once he/she has felt the sting of being punished for lying (it can entail a prison sentence), he/she may decide to offer the sought-after information. (“Joe’s brother took the knife home.”)
But the omnia praesumuntur maxim does make it possible for us to lob the spoliator with the entire crime, be it the polluting of a river, child-kidnapping, bombing the Boston Marathon, whatever.
Is it legal to do that? Well, who is going to enforce the legality? Remember: if the powerful are determined to get away with murder, they will use every person they can to help them – a judge, a lawyer, a politician, the janitor of the building where Joe hid the knife, etc.
I believe that the point of the existence of the law maxims is to tell a judge that he is within his rights – if not his duty – to take the position described in the maxim. After all it has to be up to some human being to make the law maxims work.
Moreover, I say the layperson can do it, or t least shout about it.
Nine-Eleven
I was recently at a meeting with law students and realized that they are too young to recall the events of 9-11. I also got the impression that the official story is well accepted by them. Indeed, most Americans are still willing to believe that “19 Arab hijackers” are the guilty party for the removal of the Twin Towers from Manhattan’s landscape (as well as striking the Pentagon and a field in Shanksville, Pennsylvania).
Yesterday a friend of mine (Lawrence Fine) showed me a website he made, concerning various controversies about 9-11. I will pick out just one of the photos he has collected (shown above in this article). Excuse my lack of research experience as to what was found under the Towers. I show the photo only to make a general indication of the problem of getting the law to be used when the subject matter is “a terror attack.”
I am pretty sure that law schools (which are all controlled by the ABA, American Bar Association) do not have a course entitled “Let’s dig into conspiracy theories, 101.” But they should have such a course. It would be a way of teaching many of the maxims, but especially “Against the spoliator, everything can be presumed.” By the way, a spoliator isn’t only one who suppresses evidence but also one who plants it, tampers with it, etc. Photoshopping comes to mind.
Nine-eleven scholars – and the are many of them – may wish to examine the above photo and try to find out of the cratering of that land occurred before, or after, the famous event (on the morning of September 1, 2001). To whom can they turn?
If they had seen the photo on the day it was snapped (I will pretend they did), and went to police, FEMA, the mayor, or any official, I bet they would have been told that they must stay out of the area. Typical reasons given would have been: their safety, the excavators’ safety, and necessary secrecy of a crime scene. Sounds good but one can challenge it!
Obvious Lying
We don’t have room here for a long list of blatant lies that the media or the government told us on 9-11. One example is that “fact” that the passport of one of the hijackers was found on a New York street, near the Towers. (Did you know a passenger’s tooth was found in a tree near the Shanksville “crash site”?)
I call attention to the fact that, although the passport-on-the-street is now widely considered to have been a physically impossible souvenir, there has never been a correction of it, much less any punishment for anyone who purveyed this lie. After all, would any court be willing to adjudicate the case. They should, of course, do so, but “we all know how it is.”
Consider also the government’s own explanation as to how the Towers fell that morning. The matter was handled by a government agency, NIST – National Institute of Standards and Technology. Its “scientists” promulgated a false explanation. NIST said wTC 7 came down without the use of explosives, office fires only. This was later rebutted by a study at the University of Fairbanks Alaska.
I hope your first thought, when I said that, was that the NIST makers of the crazy explanation are now eligible for punishment. Indeed they are. Even without a maxim, they seem to be guilty of perjury. And if the FBI recruited them to tell that lie, the FBI person is a suborner of perjury which is a felony (a crime that involves prison time.). I quote 18 USC 1622:
“Whoever procures another to commit any perjury is guilty of subornation of perjury, and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.”
Simple, right? But it doesn’t happen.
The Grand Jury and “Cert Denied”
Finally, I hope to arouse your ire about another aspect of 9-11. In late 2001, Congress passed a statute to force all court cases related to 9-11 to be handled (if federal) at only one district court, namely the US Court of the Southern District of New York. I’m guessing that this violates the Seventh Amendment which allows you to sue someone at the court near their home.
In any case, a group known as The Lawyers Committee for 9-11 Inquiry, decided to take a sort of sideways approach to overcome the barrier of governmental secrecy about 9-11. They filed a petition with the US Attorney for that district (SDNY). That is, the federal prosecutor. They asked him to hand in to the Foreman of the sitting Grand Jury, some information from the Fairbanks study that challenged the government’s NIST claims.
It took this Committee many years to get that far. And you would think the US Attorney had no choice but to oblige. How could he possibly not allow information about crimes to be withheld from a grand jury? The fact is, he did so order.
The Lawyers’ Committee for 9-11 Inquiry, headed by Mick Harrison, then went to court (same court), to file a civil case asking for “declarative relief and injunctive relief” by invoking the law of mandamus. They got a No. In response, they appealed to the Second Circuit. But in the August term of 2021, the Second Circuit ruled against this request for mandamus.
(In a mandamus order, a court can tell a part of the government to do its job.)
Undaunted, or at least not completely crushed, Mick Harrison, for the Committee, petitioned the US Supreme Court for “certiorari,” known in the trade as “cert.” Such a petition does not have to be answered by SCOTUS. Only when four or more of the none justices agree to take the case do they grant cert.
In my mind there is no question that the justices, all nine of them, were nonetheless obliged to hear this case, since the Second Circuit’s ruling was so egregious. That is, the appeals judges said the US Attorney can refuse the citizens’ request to pass information about crime to a grand jury.
You know what came next. In 2023, the Lawyers’ Committee for 9-11 Inquiry received the reply “Cert denied.”
The US Supreme Court allows evidence to be hidden regarding the most important US event of this century, one that has led to many wars and a complete forsaking, by Congress, of the Bill of Rights.
What to do?
Contra spoliatorem, omnia praesumuntur.
Excuse me. I have not yet supplied the photo credit. Will do.
Professor Francis Boyle became prominent at the start of the “pandemic”
“The Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989 (BWATA) was drafted by University of Illinois international law professor Francis A. Boyle.[2] The law, known as it went through the U.S. Senate during the 101st U.S. Congress as S. 993, was introduced to the Senate on May 16, 1989”
He is now alerting us to the revision of the Pentagon’s War Manual.
NEW PENTAGON WAR MANUAL REDUCES US TO “LEVEL OF NAZIS
https://francisaboyle.substack.com/p/new-pentagon-war-manual-reduces-us?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=1916633
International Law………..
Mossad op? Enable removal of hostages to Gaza, use them to justify a long operation to ‘free the hostages’ that allows the eventual complete genocide of Palestinians and total destruction of Gaza as hostages are slowly returned piecemeal at Mossads leisure, not Hamas. Then the ‘resettlement’ begins, to completely occupy Gaza and reap all those billions from the new gas fields off shore. Money and murder always go hand in hand with the chosen ones.
“So let’s be clear. Israel has no need to provide any justification to the rest of the world for taking action to release its citizens who had been taken illegally as hostages. That it undertook a highly dangerous mission to do so speaks highly of its determination and moral fibre, and of the courage of the soldiers directly involved. I have no concerns whatsoever about the methods employed, and the degree to which deception was used – those are simply operational decisions. Can anyone think of a war where combatants, particularly behind enemy lines, have not posed as something other than soldiers (we celebrate the bravery of the French Resistance for the part they played leading up to D-Day, but I’m sure they didn’t dress up in distinctive uniforms before heading into action behind a marching band)?
It does seem that a battle commenced when it became clear that the ‘displaced Gazans’ were in fact IDF soldiers. In that battle, which only took place because Hamas were unwilling to simply lose their hostages, there were many Palestinian deaths. Hamas never distinguishes between deaths of fighters and deaths of civilians – in their world view, every muslim is duty bound to join in the fight to eliminate Israel – but a fair number of those killed are likely to be Hamas fighters (more good news).
Well done to the IDF for the courage they showed, and for the joy they brought to not just the friends and families of the released hostages, but to the whole of Israel and to everybody who is still sane and objective elsewhere.
I fear that we are unlikely to see any repeats given the murderous intent of Hamas, so spare a thought for those who are still captive, and their friends and families.”
https://www.spiked-online.com/2024/06/10/the-racism-of-never-blaming-hamas-for-anything/ (Comments section)
USS LIBERTY, 1967, ANYONE?!
Indeed Ned – says it all. E.B. can’t seem to see the forest for the trees yet – but she will in time.
E.B obviously is oblivious to False Flags.
Yeah, every bit as “oblivious” as each and every Hamas kingpin and mainstream shill
Which beggars the question as to why you haven’t shared your invaluable knowledge with Yahya Sinwar,
And the question as to why he hasn’t come forward and validated all the hot media “false flag” gos ?
Or is he really just an Israeli “plant” – who, for some reason or other, was never called out as such until 7/10/23 ?
O what a tangled web we weave……
An Israeli “plant” who somehow managed to be-fool the entire Arab community
Or an unwitting Arab dupe who was every bit as gullible as his fellows
Every bit as open to manipulation by a bunch of conniving Jews
Who also managed to trick the rest of the world bar a coterie of super-canny conspiracy theorists
A situation which, given the survival-of-the-fittest-monkeys-to-man credo that’s largely embraced on these pages would mean that everything is A-okay
Sandra – Law of War Manual, 2015, subjugates all other international or national, military or civilian.
The planet is now under Martial Law (Law of War Manual, 2015) but many still cannot see it.
More “Law Making”
WHO Won? with James Roguski | Noor Bin Ladin Calls
THE GRIFT GOES ON
“Last month, many in the Alternatve Media and in the Health Freedom Movement celebrated when the World Health Organization’s dread Pandemic Treaty was tabled after the member states were unable to come to an agreement. People rejoiced that a treaty that would have nullified the national sovereignty of our countries had been shut down.
However, as James Roguski warned us last week, “The 77th World Health Assembly HAS adopted a substantial package of amendments to the International Health Regulations. We the People have suffered a stunning defeat.”
https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/who-won-with-james-roguski-noor-bin-ladin-calls/
A must watch for everyone specially for Dee
This in my honest opinion should go viral.
A response to Dan’s award.
13. 57 minutes 2 journal entries
73,384 views May 6, 2024
“No other Cop has done what I did – slam the government of the day and then quit Live On Air. This is the origin story of Krystle Mitchell and how she found herself standing up during the Covid Era world famous Melbourne Lockdowns because her conscience above all else wouldn’t let her go along with it all in silence.”
Watch it all Krystle’s Origin story is very important.
Her observations and actions are exemplary.
At least check in at about 13mins 57 secs-when Krystle reads a journal entry
“ somehow if we could tap into that psyche and change it it what a powerful voice we would have. True Liberty True Freedom –what a fool is the person who would give it up so freely.”
Then
18 mins 14 secs the last straw— when they shot the rubber bullets at the people at the Shrine.
The shrine is in the Kings Domain
The above video is not to be missed.
Yes,the Companion of the Order of Australia honour misappropriated.
Figurehead or head busily figuring, I would say the latter, it’s in the blood
Scroll down to old newspaper “Nation wide hunt finds no sign of stone” – ho ho
https://defending-gibraltar.net/t/not-my-king-protest-charles/3925/30
Thanks Diane
BBC man dies while hiking:
“Natural Causes” = nothing, not heatstroke, not celery juice, no bump in the head, nothing. 40 degrees is not that hot when you’re next to a beach, 40 degrees is routine in lots of places, just a case of too many boosters ?
But they found his phone on the beach then they said he went up the wrong track, and was found next to a fence … “make it look like an accident” ?
What was he working on ?
Where was Dr Mosley in this debate
Andrew Bridgen talks to empty House
What an EMBARRASSING END – the gallery bursts out in applause and the Speaker holds up her hand and orders silence… Her little hand won’t hold back the factual tsunami
He is a very mainstream TV celeb, diverting huge masses of people away from the white bread culture that “real” doctors thrive on, quite a thorn in one’s side wot ?
Or worried about. Ref SU theory linked down some.
Provax and vaccinated at start of pandemic.
Not able to ascertain his position in recent times.
Too many inconsistencies
Because he died on his back it must be natural causes.
Died at 4pm on the day he disappeared June 5 after separating from his wife at 1:30pm.His body was found on the 9TH-NO time of death can ever be that precise.
He was seen crawling on CCTV footage -?date
why did he drop his phone on the beach
My phone stays in my pocket
Here we go:
https://rumble.com/v50zilu-top-bbc-presenter-found-dead-after-vowing-to-expose-covid-vaccines.html
The legal action is heating up.
The people must get behind it everywhere, especially Melbourne.
Dr IAN BRIGHTHOPE
https://ianbrighthope.substack.com/p/the-legal-action-is-heating-up?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=1749153&post_i
For Mary
Dr Marcel Polte- MKULTRA-splitting a child’s consciousness and creating programmable alters
Personally Diane, I think the majority of the population has PROGRAMMABLE ALTERS. These alters of the mass population are compliant and unquestioning ‘slaves’. How else can facts be so easily disposed.
They deal with MKI later around 20
“AI is running the whole simulation”
Note Apple announcement today
“Astral AI is running the whole show
To become enlightened you have to go beyond mind”
“Mind is the barreir to enlightenment”
“What we call mind is AI and it is an AI program running through the biological computer
It is the biological computer that through the 5 senses locks us into the matrix”
“Once you let consciousness in it sees things the Ai programmed mind does not want you to see”
Good ‘ol Icke
yes a phenomena—phenomenal – “highly extraordinary or prodigious; exceptional:”
Listened over the stove
Shite!
The cause of the crater under the WTC-World Trade Center Bombing 1993
https://www.fbi.gov/history/famous-cases/world-trade-center-bombing-1993
Mary,
You are dreaming, it will not be sorted out with your legal epistles.
For a change, go listen and watch to the commentary by MARY at her situation update today at beforeitsnews.com people powered news.
At least listen for first ten minutes and CW at about 35 mins.
I am up to about 45 mins. Note the info/allegation about Dr Moseley.
MM are you even aware that from 9/6 the US dollar is stuffed?
Catch up on what is really going on and save your time with all your legal theories.
the link:
MM , Did you get to the end from 58 min? and listen to the news from redacted?
Better get your helmet and rifle and duck down to Florida or just go see your soul mates and stock up on some Prozac to trade with whilst they are there watching your ABC and globalist controlled ‘tellALIEVISION’ .
“Is this the real life – oo-aa – is this just fantasy … etc”
What happens when legal epistles and white hats both don’t work out.
Everything’s corrupt and lies.
John Bolton came on TV and said Trump had rang up Biden after 2020 and congratulated him on winning the election, a lie for sure but he got it out there on ABC-TV or 9M$M I forget which. Most people will just accept it, another piece fitted into the fake jigsaw puzzle in their heads.
Reiner Feullmich has some court-watchers. I found this at the website of “truthsummit.substack.com” and she in turn quotes another reporter, Daniela Goeken’s Telegram channel, FREE Reiner Füllmich:
“So far everything has gone well, Wörmer and Miseré have each given a “speech”, no idea what that’s called. But when we were told that the trial wouldn’t start until 10 o’clock and more and more police buses pulled up, we started to feel a bit queasy… what were they expecting? Our riot because of the verdict??? In addition, our bags were checked for the first time before we handed them in
“Reiner told us that he had been put in leg irons and advised to wear a bulletproof vest. In case a policeman accidentally misses… He also talked about machine guns… Miseré then complained that there were no safety precautions for him, even though he had already been threatened once… In any case, his speech was great again, just what we are used to from him! The court sat there looking a bit dazed, as if they had been scolded. But they deserved it for what happened last time!”
We seem to be having a festival of mind-control films here today. Here is my highly-respected friend, Anneke Lucas. At around 2.5 minutes she mentions that The Minister of Defense (of Belguim, I think) was in the pedo group. Same with the South African Minister of Defense accused by Mark Minnie in “The Lost Boys of Bird Island”.
Let’s see, who is the Minister of Defense in Oz….
Anneke also says that it is a mafia that orgnizes the blackmailing via pedophilia.
Well MM fancy that.
Ever heard of Epstein and Maxwell of MODSAD doing that.
Thus who controls your country?
No time to consider SU linked above, or keep up with your what is actually happening in your country?
Other replies apparently being CENSORED.
MM just try, look at SU with ‘redacted’ from about 58 mins to the end…. Better get down to Florida with your rifle.
The American military base, at Guantanamo Bay, Camp Delta is way closer – it is in Cuba.
Guess who’s coming to Dinner? Maybe the Russians?
Or you could just appreciate the Anneke Lucas video, it’s a marvel what you can get on spewtube these days.
So, I need to appraise someone’s video to know that, do I Joe?
Maybe, you could also inform me who are the real controllers of this world, even controlling the mafias – and there are many of them.
M M,
Get a grip on reality and your country and banker mates.
Listen to Jim Willie and friends at beforeitsnews.com people powered news.
‘New Dr Jim Willie disclosure bombshell news: rate of gold in the evolution of monetary systems’
MM forget the legal epistles mirages and count your dollars, the US is stuffed….and we are as well with our idiots.
IT IS MUCH MORE THAN SEVEN MINUTES IF YOU CAN MANAGE.
Mary is probable still working on Trump’s indictment, while the world passes her by.
Huh? I was never working on Trump’s indictment. I am working on the Lahaina fire, K?
Curfew tolls the knell of parting day, etc.
🤪🤪🤪🤪💁 MM; fix climate change, drop your jeans and wear hot pants💁😱🤪
[ dr Willie]
MM.
I have just sent you the link to the latest thoughts from Clif High at rumormillnews.com on 11/6: 15.31.59
Ever heard of the Elohim worship ‘cult’? If not,think on that.
Hope it opens –ever heard of Brooke Federline–another phenomenal being —
https://t.me/s/BrookeFederline?before=7271
Also connecting some dots -Last nights Insight report on Vapes and illegal cigarette industry run by cartels gangs – From my personal history files of cartels in Australia– drugs and cults and mind control –and Scopolamine.
Josephine Cashman alerted me to this and Gabbi Choong has been alerting us about the way we are being mass mind controlled through Tavistock experiments and drugs such as Scopolamine.
A few links
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-11-13/sleepy-town-secretive-drug-centre-big-pharma-criminal-cartel/100572628
“Duboisia has been exploited by major pharmaceutical companies for its drug content for decades.(ABC Southern Queensland: Jon Daly)”
“The winding rows of native Duboisia shrubs snake through red volcanic soils on a massive scale.
Global pharmaceutical companies have quietly built a lucrative supply chain from the town of Kingaroy for decades.”
“For a long time there were a lot of secrets kept about Duboisia, for whatever reason I don’t know, because I saw there was no value in keeping things quiet,” former grower Russell Exelby said.”
“Once it leaves the farm gate, you don’t have any idea of what’s going on, so yeah, [it is a] very secretive industry and very controlling,” the farmer said.
Alkaloids of Australia has been charged with criminal cartel offences.(ABC Southern QLD: Jon Daly)
The alleged drug cartel
The Australian-owned company and its former export manager, Christopher Joyce, face 33 criminal cartel charges following an Australian Competition and Consumer Commission investigation.
The ACCC alleges Alkaloids of Australia and other overseas suppliers of scopolamine fixed prices and restricted the chemical supply to international manufacturers from 2009 when criminal cartel laws came into force in Australia.
Mr Joyce has pleaded guilty to some charges and will be sentenced in the Australian Federal Court. Alkaloids of Australia is yet to enter a plea.
“The specific purpose of most cartels is to increase the profits of the cartel members by agreeing to act together instead of competing with each other,” ACCC chair Rod Sims said in a statement.
“This is the first guilty plea by an individual to criminal cartel conduct under the criminal cartel laws.”
https://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/national/queensland/medical-company-charged-with-cartel-offences-after-accc-investigation-20201201-p56jln.html
An Australian supplier of an ingredient used in antispasmodic medications has been charged with multiple criminal cartel offences.
Alkaloids of Australia Pty Ltd and its former export manager, Christopher Kenneth Joyce, have each been charged with 33 criminal cartel offences by the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions.
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2024/apr/09/brittany-higgins-questions-whether-she-was-drugged-on-night-of-alleged-in-new-submission-to-court-ntwnfb
[…] Article […]