On Australia Day 2023, Think about Martin Bryant

1. Help of the helpless, O abide with me.

   Reply

   • A great summary right down at the end of the comments section from Aussiemal

     Reply

2. This rapper has had 103, 000 views. Not bad!

   When I saw it years ago, it did not have the dedication to Wendy Scurr at the beginning.

   Reply

3. Cherri’s song also now has new photos.

   Start at 2 minutes:
   “He wears the scars. Tassie locked him away. Australia, wake up to the truth.”

   Just think, if Australia had faced the truth 27 years ago, or even 8 years ago when Gumshoe started hammering on this, how many bad things would not be happening today.

   Huh?

   Reply

   • Around where I live they are still paying $2 or $3 daily for the newspaper, it’s hard to understand why, maybe they can’t think of anything else to do in the morning

     Reply

     • From a TP point of view, a 2 dollar broadsheet is a reasonable price plus its not been unavailable since the Guggenheim pressed forth. As long as you can recognize poison ivy, any broad leif will do.

       Every court appointed official was complicit at PA. May you find mercy, Chief Justice William Cox, AKA a wanted person known as WILLIAM COX.

       Reply

4. Dee McLahlan’s 10-minute movie has had 7.8K views.

   You are hereby commanded to watch it.

   Reply

5. Start at 3 minutes. I am reading from a page of secret stuff, which I have distributed to many. Dr Dax, one of the amazing perpetrators of mind control, was Martin’s doctor, in Hobart, from the unscrupulous Tavisock of London.

   (The word unscrupulous is an understatement.) I do NOT mean to indicate that Bryant was a Manchurian candidate. He was not, at least not on April 28, 1996. He was not present in the Broad Arrow Cafe. (I don’t rule out that the real shooter was operating under hypnosis. Please see my article tomorrow about Karen Wetmore who would never have known what she did under hypnosis but for finding the CIA records via the Freedom of Information Act.)

   God bless the Freedom of Information Act. Oh, by the way, it is now 2 years since the DoD has declined to tell me if Gen Boykin was in Australia at the time Ms Barnett says he was. (They’re backed up with work due to Covid, you know.)

   Here is a moment from the 2016 Fringe. Dee and I and Malcolm Hughes jointly asked the Governor of Tas (who was al law professor) to grant MB a pardon, simply to get him out of there, after we saw this outrageous report. By the way, Glenside Hospital in Adelaide no longer exists. It is luxury apartments.

   Thanks to the guy (gal?) who conveyed this stunning info about MB’s torture before the age of 21:

   Reader, are you going to continue to put up with this?

   Reply

6. My next door neighbor is a Bryant. Over a beer one day, he told me that he regretted his surname. I asked him why?

   He lamented that it is the same name as the killer in Tasmania. I began to tell him of what I had learned about that massacre, and that Martin Bryant was not the killer.

   His eyes began to glaze over – so I dropped the subject.

   In my opinion, it will take the average Aussie the realization that he/she has been conned big time by media, and government before they will even entertain the thought of Martin Bryant being innocent.

   Reply

   • “His eyes began to glaze over”

     How often have I been confronted by the same phenomena!
     The response is always that of a child being ear-bashed by something that’s way too complex for their mental capacity

     Reply

7. I share this today. Apologies for the way I speak of things but I think it is important.
   first half our starting at 3 mins. –or jump to 22 mins -33—Gabbi Choong speaking with Aishe PAM

   
   Focus on AUSTRALIA (032) with GABBI CHOONE & AISHE (PART 2) TAV#STOCK DOWNUNDER

   Reply

   • Some paragraphs from Mass Murder in Australia.
     Tavistock deploys to Australia
     In the early 1950s, Rees sent two of his “psychiatric shock troops” to Australia, Dr. Eric Cunningham Dax and Dr. Fred E. Emery.
     Dr. Eric Cunningham Dax
     Dax had written a chapter for Rees’s 1949 book, {Modern Practise in Psychological Medicine}, and had trained at the same hospital where Rees had practiced.
     Dax was also a protege of Sargant. Sargant had initiated a brainwashing technique called “deep sleep,” in which patients were given massive doses of drugs, to keep them asleep 20 hours or more a day, which increased their susceptibility to “programming.”
Under Sargant’s tutelage, Dax performed 1,300 experiments in deep sleep, and rapidly became one of Britain’s top practitioners of so-called “physical methods” of psychiatry, which included pre-frontal lobotomies, on which Dax wrote a monograph, and electric shock, which was often administered during “deep sleep.”


     “Arriving in Australia In 1952, Dax set up the Mental Hygiene Department of Victoria, which in turn set up Australia’s entire mental health care system.
     As Rees said in his introduction to the book he told Dax to write, {Asylum to Community: The Development of The Mental Hygiene Service in Victoria, Australia}: “The Mental Hygiene Service of Victoria, may, indeed, have provided a major training ground in psychiatry and mental health work for all the English-speaking populations of the South-western Pacific region, and this is a matter of very great importance.”
     Dr. Fred Emery
     The second Tavistock brainwasher whom Rees dispatched to Melbourne around the same time, and whose work would help shape Dax’s own, Dr. Fred Emery, set up shop as Senior Research Officer in the Department of Audio Visual Aids at Melbourne University.
     There, Emery began conducting experiments on schoolchildren, as described in his article “Psychological Effects of the Western’ Film,” to see how “oedipal patterns” could be induced in schoolchildren–a subject of some relevance to 28-year-old Martin Bryant, and the mysterious deaths of both his father and Martin’s own elderly girl friend. By the early 1960s, Emery, together with the chairman of Tavistock’s governing council, Dr. Eric Trist, was giving lectures to select audiences at Tavistock on methods to brainwash entire societies.”
     Arriving in Australia In 1952, Dax set up the Mental Hygiene Department of Victoria, which in turn set up Australia’s entire mental health care system.
     As Rees said in his introduction to the book he told Dax to write, {Asylum to Community: The Development of The Mental Hygiene Service in Victoria, Australia}: “The Mental Hygiene Service of Victoria, may, indeed, have provided a major training ground in psychiatry and mental health work for all the English-speaking populations of the South-western Pacific region, and this is a matter of very great importance.”

     “Meanwhile, in Australia, Dax brought Sargant to Melbourne on Aug. 14, 1962, to lecture on “The Mechanism of Brainwashing and Conversion.”
     Another of Sargant’s proteges, the Sydney-based psychiatrist Dr. Harry Bailey, was a fanatical practitioner of “deep sleep,” and killed a number of patients during experiments at the Chelmsford Private Hospital in the 1960s and 1970s.”

     “University of Melbourne on July 20, 1964, titled “Some Observations on Psychiatric Research.” “It is no more than a few years past,” he said, “when psychiatry was solely represented by the mental hospitals, before the child guidance clinics were first begun or the psychiatrists started to move into the outpatient diagnostic centres…. The mental hospitals may be likened to the grandmothers of community psychiatry….”

     “Something of great interest must have been taking place in Tasmania, because two of Tavistock’s leading international operatives, the Melbourne-based Dr. Alan Stoller, a past president of the World Federation of Mental Health and a close associate of John Rawlings Rees and of Dax, and Dr. John Bowlby, went to Tasmania for extended visits in 1971 and 1972, respectively.
     Dax and Bryant –
     From early childhood, Martin Bryant was a very disturbed individual, as British psychiatrist Paul Mullen could not help but record in his evaluation for the defense:”

     Reply

     • “Emery, together with the chairman of Tavistock’s governing council, Dr. Eric Trist, was giving lectures to select audiences at Tavistock on methods to brainwash entire societies.”

       Diane, to whom did Trist answer? (if you know).

       Reply

8. They are all part of the same scheme, tools bringing the same result. Utopia for the few, slavery for everyone else.
   Who’s on board with this satanic plan to crush honesty, integrity and fair play?

   There are two spiritual powers, good under Christianity, and the bad usurious banksters, corporations media sucking all wealth, seizing all power with useful idiots enforcing the BS.

   Not much to celebrate tomorrow.
   PA was the blueprint for our common suffrage here since. Invasion day, as stated by the true locals of Oz, is what it is.

   Reply

   • I met a couple of fellers around the same age as MB who got around with Bryant in younger days. They mentioned that he often quoted the Bible. I thought how handy it was that the Satanists had a Christian to sacrifice and his property to grab hold of.

     Reply

   • The irony is ANT that the genocidal invasion, beginning in 1770 (via the hush-hush distribution of smallpox-infected ribbons at Botany Bay by Cook and Banks on behalf of the British Royal Society) was orchestrated and carried out by British Christians and continued via Christian missionaries. The somewhat strange dichotomy (almost Social Darwinist-divisionism in its tone) that you try to draw between ‘goodie’ Christians and ‘baddie’ banksters serves merely to both obfuscate and guild the lily. The vast majority of so-called corporate-controlled, blood-sucking, abusing, bank-dependent ‘democratic republics’ describe themselves as Christians. Go figure. Indeed, from 1770 in this land racism had been the predominant paradigm: a paradigm predicated on the distorted European notion of cultural and racial superiority based on ‘the concepts of social order, protection of property, birth rights and Christianity.
     These eugenicist perspectives, distortions of Darwin’s evolutionism, proposed that different races were effectively different species and that cultural differences, were the result of underlying biological differences which caused them. Incidentally, these same Spencerian arguments were used by British capitalists and the aristocracy against the English working-class.

     “British colonization would have implied grave danger to Aboriginal society…because English forms of land use simultaneously attacked its spiritual and economic roots. In the circumstances of the industrial revolution, it was to be the special misfortune of the Aborigines that they occupied land that offered rich profits to British graziers. [For the European]….land was essentially an economic resource: a key to social status and political power…for the Aborigines…land had totemic significance…the spiritual aspects of their relationship with the land were as compelling as the economic”, (Yarwood & Knowing 1982).

     First Nations peoples’ land and society were linked: there was no distinction between the sacred and the secular. Loos, 1982 suggests that “Thus the land and the life force associated with it, pulsed through the daily activities…and in the cycle of religious ritual which linked the present with the creative impulse of the eternal Dreamtime, and thus guaranteed the future…Aboriginal “law” speaks in most part through religion…and the authority of religious leaders is carried over into the cycle of life to which the religion is attuned”, Further, the Aboriginal Dreamtime had no gods to adjudicate the world, only ancestor spirits which were anthropomorphic in form: sometimes human; sometimes flora; sometimes fauna. All aspects of the environment were affected by the power of the spirits and as Irene Watson suggests, “the land itself is a kind of church…it is a kind of theophany where the land itself contains the essence of the Ancestors, and is the work of the Ancestors”, Compare that exquisite DIRECT world-view to puny INDIRECT Christianity and its necessity to have to go though the priest-hood to the son to get to the father. Watson: “Aboriginal histories tell us we were born of the land, not merely owners and controllers of property in a European context, but as human beings existing in an ongoing cycle of relationships…The land is our identity, this land is me”,
     This cosmology bears little resemblance to that of Christianity. The direct and immediate nature of Aboriginal religion is in contrast to the indirect route to God via the priesthood or the Christ or the wafer as the conduit. The immediacy of the sacred place here is at variance with the removed and bifurcated Heaven of the Christians. The amorphous nature of spirit meant that it was not concentrated in cities or churches: it was all-pervasive.

     Christian clergy and missionaries provide the illustration of the power of ‘invisible luggage’ in race relations. Citing Winthrop, Yarwood & Knowling suggest that this group had a ”professional commitment to undermine the religion and culture of pagan races and they used a bible that was replete with associations between blackness on the one hand and evil and subordination on the other” Further,”The colonists carried from Britain to Botany Bay a picture of what a proper man looked like in terms of skin colour, physiognomy, dress, and gait. The picture included expectations about language, housing, diet, hygiene…the use of land and private property and this identikit picture stressed the ingredient of skin colour”.

     The European penchant for individual ownership was at variance with the communality of the Aboriginal as well. Tied into this is the notion of labour and the biblical commands to ‘render the land fruitful’. Philosophers like Locke contrasted the ‘unproductive occupation’ of the New World by American Indians with European farmers and justified occupation and colonisation in terms of bringing the wilderness into ‘proper economic use’. Productive Christian Puritan work ethics underpinned the reasoning as did the English notion of law forcing proprietors to place a portion of their land under cultivation. Such preconceived ideas inform Australian colonisation and help shape race relations, and biblical and philosophical texts give justification for the removal from the land of the Aboriginal peoples. After all, according to Genesis 3:19, “the descendants of Adam are required to live by the sweat of the brow”, and Aboriginals appeared to live idle and unproductive lives “untouched by the punishment imposed by God.”)

     Basic recipes of argument used to justify the Aboriginal genocide were used against the Irish and the Indians. Along with the development of racial typologies, the ideas of an ordered hierarchy or Great Chain of Being, a supremacy of enterprise of the British ( a legacy of hierarchically- structured and imagined Christianity) and the idleness of the ‘natives’ who made no proper use of land, spew forth endlessly, shaping inter-racial behaviour via their propagandistic rote. The dichotomy, reflected in the denigrated designation of the Aborigines as ‘savages’ and the glorification of the Europeans as ‘pioneers’ was carefully constructed. And along with widespread notions such as that of Aborigines being a ‘species of tail-less monkeys’ gave justification to the murderous genocide which followed and contributed to the dilution of Aboriginal legal rights.

     Aboriginal tribal society was broken as early as 1790 around Sydney but guerrilla resistance continued and grew at the edges of settlement. While resistance took the form of sheep and cattle spearings and theft, it was quickly followed by punitive raids and massacres by the Christian Europeans. Dramatic clashes and massacres were repeated as the frontiers moved up and down the coast and eventually across Australia. Irene Moores (1995) citing Rory Metcalf regarding massacres in Northern NSW notes, “there were other and greater massacres perpetuated about the same period for trivial offences, and sometimes for no substantial reason at all. The whites had method of seeking retribution that was a disgrace to Christianity…far from showing any regard for the lives of the original owners, ignored all their right as to property, and yet were most brutal when their own rights were transgressed”,

     Grace Smallwood notes that convicts were allowed to have the weekends free from their master’s properties on the condition that they brought back aboriginal scalps and that these scalps were in fact pairs of ears. “One gorges at the Sunday afternoon manhunts, of sexual mutilation, of burying live Aboriginal babies up to their necks in sand and kicking their heads off after tying with a rope the severed neck of the husband around the raped spouse”. Ian Hughes, in Reynolds’ Race Relations in North Queensland describes open warfare on Aborigines and quotes an editorial of The Queenslander wherein it says there was a…“fitful war of extermination waged upon the blacks something after the fashion in which other settlers wage war upon noxious wild beasts, the process differing only so far as the victims, being human, are capable of a wider variety of suffering than brutes”, (Reynolds 1975)
     So, since invasion and colonization, “Australia has had a history of privileging people who have white skin’’ and dehumanising the Indigenous other, (Moreton-Robinson). Successive Aboriginal generations have had to exist, ”in an environment of a sustained assault on identity and culture, continued traumatisation, enduring grief, uncertainty and fear with little opportunity to resolve or dissipate the aftermath common to survivors of trauma”, (Raphael and Wilson.2010). Dramatization for Original peoples is chronic and ongoing and the land and country are no longer safe places. Judy Atkinson notes that, ”trauma ruptures our connections to ourselves, physically, emotionally, mentally…it fractures our relationship to nature…the shock cannot get integrated…people come to believe of themselves as having no value…where cultural and traditional practices are viewed as inferior…where they are non-persons with no value”, (Atkinson 2007).

     John Tracy suggests a parallel between the South African Apartheid system and the Australian reserve systems and ominously notes that reserves have created hot houses of infection quarantined against vaccinated white society. After all, they were the centres for diseased blanket distribution. The “forced removal of Aborigines infected with a whole range of diseases to distant reserves ensured the maximum infection of the indigenous populations”, (Tracy 2007) . The Christian-Tavistock re-education programs have helped the invaders to sell pie in the sky to the Original owners who already had it all. The ongoing Christian brainwashing has created a schism for the many who are its victims…they have had a Christian wedge shoved in between the secular and the sacred so that many now prattle on about Heaven while they are forced to live on the Christian Hell that has created for them.
     )

     Reply

     • By Christianity, I do not refer to institutions or slavemason brotherhoods that have perverted Truth over a few millenia.

       To be Christian is following the teachings of Jesus Christ, pure perfection in simplicity.
       His laws are in the New Testament, free and open to read, if you need.

       Reply

       • It was the krown that invaded Oz, under kabal instruction, now enforcing global komunizm.
         All in bed together, murdering innocents.

         Reply

       • Christianity is the following of a ‘Christ’ figure (Christos in Greek, Krsna Hindu)..it is, as a method, an “indirect” route to the Supreme. Besides, I hardly think any modern Christians enact the frugal, perfection of simplicity-sacrifices of the non-killing/pacifist/no sex Essene sect to which the Nazarene is said historically, to belong. Nor do most bother to look at the 12 lost years their Christ spent wandering India & Tibet which resulted in a fusion of western and Eastern influences that upset the applecart of his Roman masters. What to speak of the more radical Zealot sect of Christians? It is of course one of the world’s youngest ‘religions’ and its dualism is in marked contrast to the monism of the far-more ancient East whose Hindu texts like the Maha Bharata, and other examples of Vedic literature like the Rig Veda, pre-date the re-worked wider (catholic) “testaments” of the Christians ratified in Nicea (326 AD) some 10,000 -100,000 years?

         How many modern Christian dualists, for instance, are aware that as a result of that fateful meeting in Nicea, all references to re-incarnation made by the Nazarene were removed by the recently-anointed & heavily-politicised Roman lap-dogs called Catholic (literally ‘wider vehicle’) Bishops? (dead sea scrolls).

         I challenge strongly your assumption that Oz is communist….you mix up your terms. We live in a foreign-controlled, corporatized Fascist-like country dictated by private capital .where Private/Public Partnerships are the tour de jour. The army, the judiciary, the education and medical industries have all been weaponized against the population (while ironically touting jingoistic nationalism. a-la Australia Day) but all ownership of business and land s ‘private’…not state-owned as would be in the case of so-called communism. Confusing the CCP with communism is akin to confusing water with oil. China ceased being communist after the US-sponsored coup by the military leader Deng in 1976 following the death of Mao. Ironically, the Christian sects I have referred to are regarded by many experts as early forms of communism in that chattels were group owned. Filtering ‘Christianity coffee’ through a Fascist-private-enterprise filter results in nothing but muddy spiritual water.

         Reply

         • You don’t believe in God because you don’t have the Holy Spirit and the love of truth within you. That’s your problem.

         • “The army, the judiciary, the education and medical industries have all been weaponized against the population”

           You have said a mouthful, sir. I wish it did not ring true.

           “but all ownership of business and land is ‘private’…not state-owned as would be in the case of so-called communism.”

           Any day now, Anonanon. But you will be allowed to own your own toothbrush, so you will be happy.

         • Communism is a road to dictatorship like any other, and here we do not have private property, we have “make-believe” private property where you become liable for so many taxes and charges you almost may as well not bother. Governement can seize your land if it wants to. Teals party was invented to push us to wall-to-wall ALP to implement more communism. Nanny state, welfare safety net, free “school” and “medical” treatment all in the package. They have so many laws they can get you on something if they want to, nobody even knows them all but “ignorance is not an excuse”, this is of course bullshit.
           I could go on but I have to go out

     • “distortions of Darwin’s evolution” ?

       And the need to distort something that was essentially woo-woo in the 1st place?

       What’s noteworthy is that the monkeys-to-man credo is still being inculcated by State-controlled “educators” at a point where it has long been disaffirmed within competent academia together with other core tenets of the doctrine:
       

       Reply

       • Here we go again…banging on about the fidelity of Academia. Some people will believe anything… as long as it comes from someone who likes to show off their mortar board and who is gowned up like a gaudy hospital patient by the cabal of wool pullers.. “Say it in Latin for God
         We need only look at the historical record to know that those who crave power have seized upon the belief system of the people in order to manipulate and control them. All good ideas start out well enough but, sometime after gaining wide acceptance, they inevitably become corrupted.

         Those who ruled the Roman Catholic Church used it as a tool for absolute control of the masses. People who did not fall into line were threatened with excommunication, doomed to burn in hell forever. If they fell too far out of line, they were burned alive on the grounds of heresy.” https://www.academia.edu/30984048/The_Corruption_of_Science https://www.i-sis.org.uk/The_Corruption_of_Science.php

         Reply

         • Ant: “You don’t believe in God because you don’t have the Holy Spirit and the love of truth within you. That’s your problem.”
           How do I spell P-R-E-S-U-M-P-T-I-O-S-L-Y A-R-R-O-G-A-N-T? Close enough. Thanks, for sorting out my problems. I could do with one of dem things you mention….I’ve been looking for a cheap Holy Spirit for yonks….Who sold you yours? I actually do believe in God…..just not your souoped-up New Testament tarnished variety. Sad about dat Gospel of Thomas being left out by the publishers of the fiction you read..

         • Here’s a good one:
           ” 18) The disciples said to Jesus, “Tell us how our end will be.” Jesus said, “Have you discovered, then, the beginning, that you look for the end? For where the beginning is, there will the end be. Blessed is he who will take his place in the beginning; he will know the end and will not experience death.”

         • “The early church councils followed something similar to the following principles to determine whether a New Testament book was truly inspired by the Holy Spirit:
           1) Was the author an apostle or have a close connection with an apostle?
           2) Was the book being accepted by the Body of Christ at large?
           3) Did the book contain consistency of doctrine and orthodox teaching?
           4) Did the book bear evidence of high moral and spiritual values that would reflect a work of the Holy Spirit?

           The Gospel of Thomas fails all of these tests. The Gospel of Thomas was not written by Jesus’ disciple Thomas. The early Christian leaders universally recognized the Gospel of Thomas as a forgery. The Gospel of Thomas was rejected by the vast majority of early Christians. The Gospel of Thomas contains many teachings that are in contradiction to the biblical Gospels and the rest of the New Testament. The Gospel of Thomas does not bear the marks of a work of inspiration of the Holy Spirit.

           Are there any other arguments that preclude the Gospel of Thomas from being included in the Bible? If we examine the 114 sayings in this writing, then we find some that are similar to existing sayings, some that are slightly different, but the majority cannot be found anywhere in the entirety of Scripture itself. Scripture must always confirm itself, and the majority of sayings in the Gospel of Thomas cannot be confirmed anywhere else in Scripture.

           One argument for precluding the Gospel of Thomas from the Bible is found in the overt “secretness” attributed to these 114 sayings by the work itself. Nowhere in Scripture is God’s Word given “in secret” but is given for all to read and understand. The Gospel of Thomas very clearly tries to maintain an air of secrecy in its words.

           The Gospel of Thomas is a Gnostic gospel, espousing a Gnostic viewpoint of Christianity. The Gospel of Thomas is simply a heretical forgery, much the same as the Gospel of Judas, the Gospel of Mary, and the Gospel of Philip. Perhaps the disciple Thomas’ nickname of “doubting Thomas” is appropriate here. We should all be doubting the Gospel of Thomas!”
           https://www.gotquestions.org/gospel-of-Thomas.html

           Small wonder it was touted by the kingpin of this cult
           https://au.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-features/australian-cults-the-rajneesh-movement-14899/

         • 50 years ago I also thought Bhagwan(Osho) was the bomb likewise “The Gospel of Thomas”
           https://www.satrakshita.com/osho_on_gnosticism.htm

           But the nature of both wound up being revealed on no uncertain terms;

           ““Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravenous wolves.
           You will know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes from thornbushes or figs from thistles?
           Even so, every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit.
           A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, nor can a bad tree bear good fruit.
           Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire.
           Therefore by their fruits you will know them.”
           MATHEW 17:15 – 20

         • All this kind of smear can just be made up, there’s no attempt to substantiate it, just simple allegations. Meanwhile in your evidence piece it says figs are good and thistles are bad. My opinion about thistles is they are a part of a traditional subsistence diet and probably have certain curative properties. Mohammad came later with sweets like Turkish Delight and Baklava to help implement his new religion.
           For my part, anyone who swallows the story that the KJV and variations are the gilt-edged word of God, unaltered and unadulterated, is I’m sorry to say a mug. Likewise anyone who says the Catholic church is without sin and ignores the fact that some part, let’s say 5%, is or has been corrupt and perverted and basically still fraudulent, is also a mug.
           This doesn’t mean large parts of the official Bible and Catholic church are invalidated, it just means they are contaminated like anything else in this world.
           That’s how the world was made otherwise why would it be as it is.

         • ”Scripture must always confirm itself”

           In other words all salient truth is evidenced via the words of multiple witnesses over generations and the material fruition thereof:

           e. g. Pslam 22 was written 943 years before Roman solders cast lots for Jesus clothing and crucified him:

           “Many bulls have compassed me: strong bulls of Bashan have beset me round.
           They gaped upon me with their mouths, as a ravening and a roaring lion.
           I am poured out like water, and all my bones are out of joint: my heart is like wax; it is melted in the midst of my bowels.
           My strength is dried up like a potsherd; and my tongue cleaveth to my jaws; and thou hast brought me into the dust of death.
           For dogs have compassed me: the assembly of the wicked have inclosed me: they pierced my hands and my feet.
           I may tell all my bones: they look and stare upon me.
           They part my garments among them, and cast lots upon my vesture.”

           The literal scenario is cited in John 19:24 Matthew 27:35, Mark 15:24, and Luke 23:34

           The veracity of the entire New Testament hangs on a multitude of other cross references;the so-called “Gospel of Thomas” isn’t verified by any literal turn of events
           The Belittlers of the former are just butt ignorant

         • The above is no different to what they did to everyone, and since you are egging me on I will play devil’s advocate and say buddha mohammad pythagorus and probably phraohs and lots more ascended to heaven, inspired by ancient sky-burials and all the usual carry-on about gods in the sky

       • If you don’t agree with what David Berlinski, David Gelernter, and Stephen Meyer have to say you should explain exactly why.
         Writing them off purely on the basis of bigotry/inverted snobbery just proves you haven’t got a leg to stand on

         Reply

         • More proof that you’re hopelessly out of touch with the real world:
           

         • EB New study (from one dem bona fide universities) finds that Christian brains were once again the most washed thing in 2022..followed closely by money sent to Unkraina

9. This is how the piss-stream media sold the ‘killer’ Bryant to the public
   SUBMISSION TO AUSTRALIAN PRESS COUNCIL RE NEWS CORP AUSTRALIA
   SPECIFIC WORDINGS : SPECIFIC NEWSCORP ARTICLES RE MARTIN BRYANT

   The following articles appear in newspapers and/or on websites owned, controlled, and/or used by News Corp Australia and its publications. (note this listing is not complete)

   Martin Bryant: The life behind bars of Australia’s worst killer Sarah Blake, »Senior Writer«; 12 SEP 2015 Adelaide Advertiser
   Monster on the inside Sarah Blake, »Senior Writer«; 13 SEP 2015 The Australian
   Martin Bryant: A police officer on scene at the Port Arthur massacre says staff need to be protected from violent offenders Sarah Blake; »Senior Writer«; 14 SEP 2015 Courier Mail
   Monster on the inside Sarah Blake, »Senior Writer«; 13 SEP 2015 Daily Telegraph
   If you needed proof that Martin Bryant is a loser, you’ve got it Sarah Blake, »Senior Writer«; 15 SEP 2015 Daily Telegraph
   Mass murderer Martin Bryant is a danger to front line jail workers, says police officer instrumental in arresting him Sarah Blake, »Senior Writer«; 13 SEP 2015 Herald Sun
   Martin Bryant: The life behind bars of Australia’s worst killer Sarah Blake, »Senior Writer«; 13 SEP 2015 news.com.au
   Mass murderer Martin Bryant is a danger to front line jail workers, says police officer instrumental in arresting him Sarah Blake, »Senior Writer«; 13 SEP 2015 NT News Facebook
   Mass murderer Martin Bryant is a danger to front line jail workers, says police officer instrumental in arresting him Sarah Blake, »Senior Writer«; 13 SEP 2015 perthnow.com.au

   If you needed proof that Martin Bryant is a loser, you’ve got it Sarah Blake, »Senior Writer«; 15 SEP 2015 RendezView
   Martin Bryant attacked inmates, staff: report writer not revealed; 13 SEP 2015 skynews.com.au
   Bryant still a vile menace Sarah Blake, »Senior Writer«; 13 SEP 2015 Sunday Tasmanian
   Mass murderer Martin Bryant is a danger to front line jail workers, says police officer instrumental in arresting him Sarah Blake, »Senior Writer«; 13 SEP 2015 Sunday Times

   The following wordings have been taken from the articles listed in this submission. Each of the wordings is followed by an italicized comment (KAN).

   »…a grossly overweight loner….« In all the articles, there is no hard evidence or verifiable reference that the person identified in the articles and in the images [still & video] is actually Martin Bryant. Identification is one of the major never-resolved issues in the Port Arthur case and it continues in all these articles.

   »[Barrister Gary] Barnes is among a small section of the legal fraternity who question Bryant’s representation at his emotion fuelled trial in 1996.« Sarah Blake either did not investigate, or she lied. She tells her readers that Martin Bryant had a trial which was fuelled by emotion. Well the truth is there was NO TRIAL – not in 1996 or at any time later. Three corrupt official mongrels (John Avery, Damian Bugg, William Cox) ensured there was nothing beyond a hearing. None of the witnesses who made written statements – there were over 100 – or Martin, or any other person gave evidence at a trial. Poor innocent Martin was arbitrarily condemned and is now dying in hell. THIS IS A STATE CRIME.

   »Bryant has been involved in several assaults and was part of an attack in February that left a male nurse with a fractured jaw.« What part (large part? small part? mere observer?) Martin Bryant played in this alleged attack is not revealed. This cruel statement is hearsay unsubstantiated by any reference and is unaccompanied by a name of a real person who could (would?) swear it was true.

   »Bryant has wreaked a violent path through various wings of Hobart’s sprawling jail, including vicious assaults on government staff and nurses.” Again, this cruel statement is hearsay unsubstantiated by any reference and is unaccompanied by a name of a real person who could (would?) swear it was true.

   »…Bryant stockpiled military grade automatic weapons.« There is no hard evidence confirming a stockpile of any weapons. This allegation is part of the official narrative which is corrupt, inaccurate, and deceptive. Martin Bryant’s then girlfriend Petra Willmott declared the following in an official written statement dated 30 APR 1996: »I have never seen any firearms or ammunition at Martin’s place.« The corrupt so-called expert Gerard Dutton made damning ballistic statements which were NEVER PROVED at a trial.

   »…he has also been known to pay other men with family blocks of chocolate in order to let him perform sexual services for them.« (sic) Again, the so-called journalist has written hearsay which can never be verified by any member of the public – or at worst, the publications have lied to their readers.

   »He was later described by experts as having the emotional and intellectual age of a five year old.« Again no reference is given. No expert is named. If it is true, then the public is to accept the official incarceration, FOR LIFE, of a boy-man who the publications want the public to hate.

   »…is drugged to point of being ›almost a vegetable‹.« (sic) It seems Martin Bryant has been drugged since 30 APR 1996. After he was apprehended, it was reported he had an IQ of 66 [retarded; what must it be now?] and he was functioning at a school-grade six level. It seems Bryant is officially and constantly drugged and the public is encouraged to hate him because he is now almost a vegetable.

   »…one insider saying other prisoners would ›kill him in a spit if they could get him‹.« Here the poison flows and the hate abounds. KILL HIM! KILL HIM! And the reference given for the source of this murderous statement is »…one insider….« The content of this statement, which at best is hearsay and at worst a lie, cannot be proved or verified.

   »Others talk of violent and unpredictable predator who targets the most vulnerable of his fellow inmates.« And the reference given for the source of this statement is »…jailers….« At best, this statement is hearsay and at worst a lie by the publication. It cannot be verified.

   »Some jailers refer to him as Porky Pig….« NO TRIAL and INCARCERATED FOR LIFE. An innocent human being of limited intelligence is struggling to hold on despite an appalling existence which Tasmania has forced upon him – and jailers laugh and call him Porky Pig. (God have mercy on your souls you mongrel screws.)

   »…put the cost of Bryant’s incarceration far higher than the $2.2 million the state has so far spent housing and feeding him. Should he enjoy an average lifespan and live to 82 years, there will be at least another $7.4 million spent on him.« After having NO TRIAL and being incarcerated for life, Martin Bryant is now blamed for the costs of keeping him in a cage. His death [natural?] will be celebrated by the cost-savers.

   »The fact is he’s Martin Bryant, and in some circles, to kill Martin Bryant, well you could hold your head up.« This murderous remark is said to have been made by Tony Bull, allegedly a former inmate. It is a good example of the outcome of the demonization of innocent Bryant, demonization which commenced even before he was left inside Seascape to be burnt alive on 29 APR 1996.

   »…the images of a heavily-sedated lump who is wasting away….« No compassion here. Sarah Blake has described a mentally retarded human being, who has been wrongly imprisoned for 19 years and who is officially drugged, as a lump (of shit?).

   »The last time we saw Martin Bryant, he looked like a fit, powerful young man. Now, he’s a huge, middle aged, lonely and pathetic piece of work. An animal, caged in the prison where he will die.« Here is hate unhidden. This so-called journalist knows nothing beyond the official narrative. Her failure to undertake a critical investigation is obvious. With investigative journalism on its last legs, her words confirm how bad things are with mainstream publications.

   »…turned the weapons on both random strangers and those he believed had wronged him.« There is no hard evidence that Martin Bryant shot any person at or near Port Arthur on the 28 or 29 APR 1996. NONE! There are however, written statements* in which witnesses clearly declare that the shooter they saw at or near Port Arthur was not Martin Bryant. Only one person who was a witness personally knew him. And this witness – Jim Laycock – stated in writing that it was not Bryant. The same observation was also written by other witnesses. This conflicted with the official narrative so these witnesses were never called to give evidence. In fact no witness was ever allowed to give her/his evidence under oath during a trial.

   . These statements given to Tasmania Police expose the corruptness of the official narrative. What is in the staggering witness statements – there are some real shockers from then members of Tasmania Police – is one reason why there was NO TRIAL. Martin Bryant was and is innocent beyond all reasonable doubt. But News Corp Australia will not tell you this.” https://indymedia.org.au/files/PENDER%20&%20WEISBROT%20-%20APC.pdf

   Reply

   • Crikey, I feel sorry for Sarah Blake. Not allowed to exercise her Brian.

     Reply

10. http://greataustraliandream.net.au/questions-about-port-arthur/
    Questions about Port Arthur
    3 years ago18 Comments by Malcolm R Hughes

    Reply

11. Incarceration equals torture.
    Arena
    https://arena.org.au/the-aboriginal-gulag-the-northern-territory-criminal-legal-system/#comments
    ‘THE ABORIGINAL GULAG’: THE NORTHERN TERRITORY’S CRIMINAL LEGAL SYSTEM

    ARENA ONLINE
    JOHN B. LAWRENCE SC
    22 OCT 2020
    Editor’s note: This article was sent to the Australian Lawyer’s Alliance’s publication Precedent in the hope of offering critique of NT legal professionals’ complicity with the disgraceful status quo of mass Aboriginal incarceration. Precedent proposed heavy edits to the article, including the very notable extraction most of the critical references to NT legal professional organisations. Such proposed censorship of dissenting voices shows a shocking lack of willingness to critically reflect on uncomfortable truths in the legal profession and adds additional weight to the arguments presented below.

    Diane de Vere says:
    October 28, 2020 at 9:39 am
    Sadly the Northern Territories Criminal Legal System has been rolled out across Australia with massive State of the Art detention centres run by SERCO.
    I share a couple of introductory paragraphs from a very comprehensive submission I made to the RC regarding Child Protection and Youth Detention in the NT. There appears to be no record of this Submission.
    “This submission supports the need for:
    1. Decisive urgent action, to expose the corruption and failure within the current system. The already identified highly paid senior executives and ministers need to be held accountable for what is in my opinion gross crimes against humanity. There is a long history of cover ups, negligence and destructive behaviors that have impacted on individuals, families and communities in the NT and I believe these politically sanctioned programs and practices are designed to control and break the minds and spirits of those who have been deliberately marginalized, and racially targeted and vilified.
    Of particular concern: re Dondale. It appeared on the video that the training and the work place culture within the detention center is based on a US Military MKUltra model that uses torture to instill fear and terror into its subjects, creating a very toxic unhealthy environment for both those in detention and those working in these facilities. There is a strong link here to the onset of complex post- traumatic stress disorder leading to suicide”

    Reply

    • Thank you, Diane. I wonder what “Serco training” consists of, now that you mention it.

      We can’t continue to put up with this.

      Reply

    • Diane, I hope you get to have a look at my response to Ant’s post above re the historical role and the extent that ideological Christianity played in helping to create a (Tavistock-like) sense of fragmentation of identity, emotional numbness, powerlessness, and internaization of blame for Original peoples…along with the more obvious physical dispossession and devastation caused via invasion.

      Reply

      • It’s true you can’t clearly define goody goody Christians vs diabolical Satanists because look the Christians in history made everything a “sin” while being infiltrated by pedos and so forth, in that light Crowley’s “Do what thou wilt” would be a liberating movement. Even the breakaway Christian sects like Hillsong and others got plenty of pedo rumours and infiltration.
        Anyway you use the term “ideological Christianity”, what is that exactly, in the context of today it could be taken to mean a type of Veganism, it doesn’t appear to mean point-of-sword conversions

        Reply

      • yes thank you aa and thank you all- for holding space.

        Reply

12. re above ABOUT THE AUTHOR
    JOHN B. LAWRENCE SC
    “John B. Lawrence SC is a Darwin barrister. He was a Crown prosecutor in Darwin and later solicitor in charge of the Northern Australian Aboriginal Legal Aid Service. He is a past president of the Northern Bar Association and of the Criminal Lawyers Association of the Northern Territory. He represented one of the Don Dale youth detainees during the Royal Commission.
    More articles by John B. Lawrence SC”

    “That silencing of Australian history was first articulated by Professor W. E. H. Stanner in his groundbreaking Boyer Lectures in 1968. Entitled ‘The Great Australian Silence’, the lectures reminded listeners not only of the historical injustices and massacres committed against Aboriginal people but how that history was deliberately buried and forgotten. Stanner explained that Australia’s sense of its past, its very collective memory, had been built on a state of forgetting that couldn’t ‘be explained by absentmindedness’. He called it a ‘cult of forgetfulness’ practised on a national scale.”

    Reply

    • You should see what’s going on in Israel at the moment. 100,000 protested in Tel Aviv yesterday against the clobbering of Palestinians. American Jews are siding with the protestors, which has Bibi worried.

      The “right-wing,” whatever that is, is trying to launch a new “war” in Gaza. It is also threatening to cancel the power of the judiciary. I thank God for Jewish awareness of justice. Wait till you see how they can fight better than the rest of us.

      But we can all learn. There’s no law of physics that says people can’t lift their game, is there?

      Reply

      • Their weapon in Australia is “I’m all right Jack”

        Reply

      • Reply

        • That narrator is brilliant, Berry. Wow.

          To anyone who thinks the Comments are going too far from the article, i.e., the fate of Martin Bryant, please ask how is the Bryant judicial injustice going to get undone?

          Also note, you can come back to this page later and add more about Bryant. Let this page stand as the venue for Martin and the Tsarnaev page, of two days ago, stay in business for Jahar stuff.

          (I’m proposing that without getting Dee’s permission, as she is out of range.)

          Reply

13. Max Igan and Gemma 1 hour.

    Check from min 42 (Netanjahu aso)
    He made the deal with Pfizer to Quackzinate the people of Israel. (In my humble view, around 60% of their 10 mil are programmed to die – Why?)

    https://gemmaodoherty.com/problem-reaction-solution-max-igan-on-the-staged-acts-of-violence-manufactured-by-government-to-bring-in-police-state/

    Reply

    • Max Igan is saying the “missing” (Gareth?) Train who was staying with his brother was contacting Mark Latham about a pedophile network operating in schools, so they are anti-vax pro-gun conspiracy theorists, now safely dead anyways.

      Reply

14. Hello Ita,
    I’m listening to you droning on from the other room, I don’t know who wrote the stuff you are reading or why you have no autocue to stop you from mixing your pages up. This stuff about hero journalists you are reading is misleading because you are the ABC, an editorial and spin-doctoring dept of the government, an embedded (communist) ALP entity. Just because you employ a few journalists to hide behind doesn’t alter the fact that your organisation is doing everything it can to stifle journalism on certain subjects, including the subject of the story on this page.
    From where I’m sitting, lies of omission are as good as any, in your position as self-proclaimed “national broadcaster”.

    Reply

15. D4CE 5th Symposium: The Psychology of Covid-19 Atrocities

    “This video summarizes the Unlimited Hangout article, Covid-19: Mass Formation or Mass Atrocity?, analyzing the abuses enacted under COVID-19 through the lens of the psychology of mass atrocity. It stresses the dangers of demonising active bystanders as ‘conspiracy theorists’, and the importance of holding atrocity’s instigators to account. The video summary, with audiovisuals by Daniel Broudy and text by David Hughes, Valerie Kyrie and Daniel Broudy, contains compelling footage of state violence and vaccine casualties never-to-be seen on prime-time TV.” https://rumble.com/v25jwa2-d4ce-5th-symposium-the-psychology-of-covid-19-atrocities.html To read the article, visit https://unlimitedhangout.com/2022/11/investigative-reports/covid-19-mass-formation-or-mass-atrocity/

    Reply

16. Well !!!
    The Alt-news is saying the Brunson case rejection has been used as a constitutional trigger for the military
    The Corporate M$M is saying Mike Pence has been busted with unauthorised official documents
    Somebody was saying Biden had a huge mountain of documents from his previous life as VP senator & whatever, so hopefully the military gets there and we’ll finally get some action

    Reply

    • they are panicking, we need to drive down harder, and enjoy our progress

      Reply

      • “palya lingku ” Simon–
        my day has been Huge
        http://nationalunitygovernment.org/content/time-fully-import-law-against-genocide-stolen-children-crisis
        support your comment Tony 11.02

        Reply

    • J.B.
      I am aware of much that you are aware of and even a lot more? of what you report and it is getting interesting.
      So many are gazing on their navels with thoughts that each have all the solutions after centuries a gazing and presenting, pasting pages of mirages without considering the immediate present and how their navels may explode,
      I am not unaware of nearly all the conflicting views. Just a bit sick o hearing all over, so many decades without a answer.
      Oh well I have tried with many others.
      Just some dots.
      My local NAB closed today…… staffing problems, said the notice.,will open on 27th….. so they know to the day when the staffing problem will be resolved.
      The Bank of America is broke… or denying withdrawals for fun.
      I am not going to compete in the contest for a winner here with the number of words presented on navel gazing with lost conspiracy causes. We know the governments and MSM are murdering evil bastards.
      Right, so let’s look at the present disclosures dripping out, there are interests on the ball, whom know and going to disclose the serial evils and deal with it, bit by bit.
      It is our duty to be aware and support such and compete, not as to whom has the deepest and widest navel with the most pearls of wisdom.
      We must consider THE CURRENT AND REAL EVIDENCE BEING DISCLOSED, for without that disclosure, that is understood, we are up the creek.
      I have tried to inform, but nothing is examined and been vilified, as usual.
      All right, want some stuff.
      The alleged presentation of brain dead Hamlin was a hoax…. To cover for discussion of the SADS.
      Bugger if I will bother awakening idiots…. Do your own research….. at BIN.
      I could not be bothered, trying to feed any more sheep.
      If anyone gives a stuff, look up todays ‘situation update’ presented by Mary and note that Senator Roberts opens up the video…..and states; “….. by God we are going to hunt you down….”
      Yep, every one of our killers to be hunted down….. says he.
      Sorry to interrupt the serial navel gazer theorists with some pearls of fact……carry on with your ‘dreams’ of justice and pages of theories for no results.
      Finally: Mm, why have YOU NOT followed up on the real Boston bomber killers photographed in the their UNIFORM KHAKI PANTS AND BLACK JACKETS?
      As I commented upon in your Boston article?
      OK, I take it that you are to busy getting justice for Bryant……. But have you ever considered the Same modus and agenda? AS FOLLOWS as examples.
      Have you ever opined on operation gladio run by NATO or the USS LIBERTY MURDERS BY ISRAEL In 1967?

      Reply

      • A watched pot never boils and this is the longest and most bizarre pot-boiler I have ever watched

        Reply

      • https://gumshoenews.com/the-liberty-ship-part-2-frontlet-615-the-key-to-everything/.

        That’s my Liberty opinion. There’s evidence that the US (LBJ) was the mastermind, not Israel. But who was lbj’s boss? I would say the globalists. As for my NATO opinion, there was a piece at juscogens.org, but its host Elias Davidsson died and the website is defunct (unless you know how to use the Wayback Machine which you and I, Ned, are not exactly geeky enough for). You’d have to go to my book Fraud Upon the Court which has a chapter entitled “Maxwell to NATO: Drop Dead.”

        I thought it was too Seppo for Gumshoe but I’ll ask Dee if she wants to run it. NATO is the ultimate scam. Do you remember when its Scottish Secy General was the guy I incriminate over Dunblane?

        Reply

        • you can welsh or be a sell out, but its hard to be more Seppo than this unit.
          

          Reply

17. but if i was to go ‘ol English I would crack like this
    

    Reply

18. Come on, Justice Cox. Be the fall guy. Your prestige colleagues will be relieved of their panic. You can do it! you can do it! They want a way out of the 2023 deadlock. If you but say “I boo-booed, sorry, xcuse me” the field will open up for all sorts of — dare I say — innovations.

    What the hell could you possibly lose? This is a win-win situation. You will be the sassiest Australian ever.

    Reply

    • I’ve been advised that if I were a member of the American Bar Association (which I’m not), I could be disbarred for writing to a judge.

      i nominate that for Stupidest Rule of the Month.

      Reply

      • Depends on what you write💁🏼

        Reply

19. Mary,
    Thank you, in appealing for justice on the unjust suffering of innocents, falsely accused and imprisoned by perpetraitors who did the killings, here and there.
    May your good work inspire all young Aussies in need of fair play.

    Reply

20. Some personal truth telling–What’s your name -who’s your family -where’s your country -what’s your story???

    https://www.portrait.gov.au/streams/michael-ghillar-anderson

    Join us online or in the Gallery for a powerful conversation with Michael Ghillar Anderson, as he speaks about his personal involvement in the establishment of the Aboriginal Tent Embassy, its 50-year legacy, and the significance and power of its continuing presence

    Reply

21. OT, In the US Might is Right but it seems now that they have met their match. –

    WARNING: USA Surrounded? Russian & China Nuclear Warships & Sub | SHTF

    Reply

    • They’re all sneaking around everywhere all the time, meanwhile Germany is probably going to send tanks to Ukraina now which probably breaks their peace treaty with Russia so now the German leadership will have to be taken down by legal means and their judiciary which is no doubt corrupt may have to be taken down by military means, all these people will look good in nooses, but personally I prefer the stocks, like Keating they should be done slowly.

      Reply

    • Germany’s For. Min. A.L. Baerbock said yesterday (Wednesday, then Tuesday in Germany): “We are at war against Russia.” According to a paywall article in the Bonnier owned DWN, Germany.

      https://deutsche-wirtschafts-nachrichten.de/701994/Baerbock-Wir-fuehren-Krieg-gegen-Russland?src=live

      Reply

      • https://rumble.com/v273f0a-breaking-germany-just-declared-war-on-russia-biden-escalates-with-tanks-to-.html

        Reply

22. Questions For Those That Still Believe Martin Bryant Was The Shooter at Port Arthur:

    How did Barry Unsworth come to make the prediction in December 1987 that, “there would never be uniform gun laws, until there had been a massacre in Tasmania? Why Tasmania?

    Why did Ray Groom change from a ministerial position in Federal Parliament to take up a Tasmanian Parliamentary career about the time of the above statement by Unsworth?

    Why did Ray Groom step down as Premier of Tasmania early in 1996, but still retain ministerial portfolios concerning the up-coming massacre?

    Why did his replacement Premier Tony Rundle take a trip during this busy change-over time, to Dunblane, Scotland? (See Notes below.)

    Why did the Tasmania Government buy the Broad Arrow Cafe when all governments, State & Federal were privatising all other ventures?

    Why did the Tasmanian Government ask a Hobart funeral business to tender for a 22 berth freezer mortuary truck in the 12 months before the massacre? No other state had such a vehicle. Why after the massacre was there an attempt to sell this truck, seeing its use was so successful?

    Why was this vehicle seen to leave Tasmania on a Military vehicle mover?

    Why did the same funeral business buy mortuary boxes to handle the corpses in excess of 22, from a Victorian company in time for the massacre?

    How is it that Police Commissioner Richard McCreadie had Martin Bryant’s file before the gunman had been identified as “Martin Bryant”?

    Why were police in numbers, not sent to Port Arthur immediately the massacre was reported? Port Arthur is 1 hour, by road from Hobart, yet only one on-duty police officer arrived at the scene by 4.30 pm.

    Who organised to keep police members from Port Arthur for over 3.5 hours? Was this also Commissioner Richard McCreadie?

    Why were there 30 people that have been identified as intelligence agents at Port Arthur that weekend?

    The gunman was never reported as wearing gloves, so why did the police never recover DNA or fingerprints from his eating tray, utensils, drink container, rifles or magazines said to have been used for the massacre? This sort of evidence is always the first evidence sought when a crime has taken place. This proves that the police knew that the killer was not Bryant. If they recovered this type of evidence the whole deceitful plot would have come apart.

    Why did the police leave the window down of the abandoned Volvo overnight so that dew would dissipate fingerprints from the steering wheel?

    Why did the gunman need to take the BMW to Seascape when he already had transport via the Volvo? Answer: There was equipment and false evidence in the BMW that had to be delivered to Seascape.

    Why was the BMW set on fire, at Seascape by a SOG officer?

    Why did the gunman need to take Glen Pears as a hostage?

    Why did the Victorian bank manager stand up and say, “no not here, not here” when the shooting started in the Broad Arrow Cafe, after which he was immediately killed?

    Why did John Avery not present Witness Statements ( in Notes below) or any other favourable to Bryant, to the court?

    Why was Roger Larner’s Witness Statement in which he proves beyond doubt that Martin Bryant could not have been at Port Arthur at the time that shootings began, taken into account?

    How did Police Commissioner Fielding know that there were no live hostages in Seascape, on Monday morning, if he did not have radio contact with the people inside Seascape?

    Why was Carleen Bryant, who was escorted to Police Headquarters by police, not asked to identify the telephone caller’s voice from Seascape as her son Martin?

    If the caller was Bryant, why was she not asked to convince Martin to give himself up?

    Why did Sergeant Dutton falsify evidence about the weapons supposedly used?

    Why did Sergeant Dutton have a questioner threatened with arrest and escorted from a “Port Arthur Massacre” meeting held in Queensland and then close the meeting?

    Why when a sniper at Seascape requested to take out a gunman firing at helicopters, he was told, “negative, this has to happen, this has to happen”? This was overheard by emergency workers on their radio.

    Why did Damien Bugg, the Public Prosecutor, write to Wendy Scurr and other important witnesses before Bryant’s appearance, stating that they would not be required to give evidence?

    Why was the Tasmanian Government able to confiscate Martin’s assets (approx. $1 million) so that he was unable to fund his own defence team? Legislation to this effect was passed after Bryant “pleaded guilt”.

    Why was John Avery, illegally chosen as Byrant’s defence lawyer, even though he had represented the D.P.P. against a witness in the same criminal case?

    Why were military helicopters heard overhead most of the night? They were not civilian or police helicopters, as it was not legal at that time in Tasmania for those mentioned, to fly after sunset.

    Why were Wendy Scurr and her husband, Graeme persecuted so much by Tasmanian Police that they had to eventually leave Tasmania?

    Why did the Australian Federal Police attempt to attack my computer three times with viruses and then crash it twice after I had made attempts to contact the then Governor General, Michael Jeffrey, in regard to my information from civilian investigators on the subject of the Massacre?

    Why was Damien Bugg rewarded with the position of Commonwealth Public Prosecutor then given permission to operate from Hobart not Canberra? (Unheard of!)

    Why was Justice William Cox rewarded with the appointment of Governor of Tasmania, the first time a Tasmanian born was given that position?

    Why is it that after Benjamin Overbeeke, was named the gunman on the internet, he supposedly committed suicide. However I have heard that his father, also implicated at Port Arthur, has stated that he did not suicide, but died in an accident? Set up by whom?

    Why was Federal legislation on gun control drawn up prior to the Massacre?

    How is it that a rifle handed in during a previous amnesty, was one of the weapons supposedly used in this massacre? Bryant could never have got his hands on such a weapon.

    Why did John Howard lie to me personally, saying that the Port Arthur Massacre was out of the Commonwealth’s jurisdiction, even though he had already declared that there would be no enquiry and that the Broad Arrow Cafe was to be destroyed? Both of those edicts were illegal.

    If the official story is true why did the Justice Cox have all official records locked away, initially for 30 years, but that has been extended to 45 years? What do the authorities have to hide?

    Notes:

    Graham Collyer who was shot in the neck, but survived, reports in his Witness Statement “that the killer had a pock-marked or acne face”, but it is known that Martin Bryant had a smooth complexion.

    James Laycock, who had known Bryant for years, stated in his Witness Statement that “he did not recognise the gunman as Martin Bryant”.

    Bryant left Larner at 1.15 pm at the earliest, yet he is supposed to have driven 3 kilometres, arrived at Port Arthur in time to stop to help two young women start their car and sell them some drugs, pay parking fees, park his car, carry rifles and video camera to the Broad Arrow Cafe, stand in a queue to order a meal walk to the verandah, then be seated and eat that meal, to then start firing a weapon at 1.27 pm. Absolutely impossible in that time frame!

    The reason for Tony Rundle’s trip? It appears the only connection between Tasmania and Dunblane, is the already executed school massacre and the planned massacre at Port Arthur.

    Seven of the dead have been named as intelligence agents. Two killed in the Broad Arrow Cafe and five at the scene where the killer exchanged the Volvo for the BMW, after he had killed them all. Two of these had been seen seated in the Volvo with the gunman.

    The bank manager, Anthony Nightingale mentioned in questions above, knew that the killings were planned to take part at the jetty. However the organisers did not take into account that daylight saving adjustment took place during the previous night. This changed the time of the cruise boat departure.

    When I reported the computer crimes, with evidence, to Mick Keelty of the A.F.P. and to the Australian Crime Commission, I received no answers.

    Four of the people involved in devious action during this time of Tasmania’s sorry history,
    Ray Groom, Damien Bugg, Justice William Cox and Police Commissioner Richard McCreadie are all receivers of the OAM. The only one that missed out was John Avery, who spoilt his chance, by being found guilty of stealing funds from a client.

    The BMW was set ablaze at Seascape to erase all evidence that Martin Bryant had not been in that vehicle. Had it not been burnt and underwent forensic testing the real gunman would have been revealed.

    See above, the use of Military helicopters. Commonwealth jurisdiction?

    Do you still believe that Martin Bryant is guilty of mass murder? If you do, I pity you, as I do Martin Bryant!

    This is a crime of massive proportions, organised by both Federal & State of Tasmania Governments and the Intelligence Agencies of Australia against the population of Australia.

    That is TREASON!

    Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.