Home Conspiracy Sandy Hook, Part 5: The Paucity of Evidence

Sandy Hook, Part 5: The Paucity of Evidence

33
(L) Wolfgang Halbig, Photo: Jeff Reidel, New York Magazine (C) the late Robert David Steele, Photo: fak.dk (R) James Fetzer, Photo: Rollingstone.com

by Mary W Maxwell, LLB

I am a conspiracy theorist. I have sufficiently looked into the 1996 Port Arthur Australian massacre and the 1996 Dunblane Scotland massacre to be able to say confidently that the victims really did die, and that the nominated gunman was not the gunman — someone else did it. Police and Parliament provided whatever was needed to prevent people from seeing the respective massacres as inside jobs.

I’ve also done my best to show that the 2014 Sydney siege was staged, and that the 2013 Boston Marathon’s “Laurel Street shootout” was staged. Regarding the 2012 Sandy Hook massacre of 20 children and 6 adults, I have been opposed to the conspiracy theory, as I assumed the children did die. I have published my beliefs that the conspiracy theorists of Sandy Hook were planted to lead us down the garden path.

I no longer think so. The three men pictured above now seem to me to have worked hard at getting the truth but were defeated at every turn. But I still have not found enough to “close the case,” either for or against, to my personal satisfaction. In Part 4, I described the firing of conspiracy theorist James Tracy, a tenured professor, which itself makes the officials look dicey.

Here in Part 5, I will attempt the simple job of describing the quite empty barrel of evidence, especially photographic evidence, of the Sandy Hook massacre. I have collected this material from several sources, but the principal investigator — for almost nine years — has been Wolfgang Halbig. He leaves no FOIA stone unturned.  I have to say that each time he is rebuffed, the conspiracy theory gains strength — as it certainly looks like they are hiding something.

The MSM Narrative

All three networks, plus PBS and CNN, came on strong within days of the massacre (December 14, 2012), and later the Encyclopedia Britannica provided a documentary. They tell it straight; there is no criticizing or questioning of officialdom, no sniffing around for foul play. For those of us who can remember the old TV show “77 Sunset Strip,” those days of crime-solving are gone.

In sum: a 20-year-old mentally ill boy, of diminutive build, wrecked his hard drive at home and shot dead his Mom. He — Adam Lanza — then drove to the rather hidden Sandy Hook Elementary School (SHES). He crashed his way through a glass door, went into a classroom of first-graders and killed 14 of them, then went to another classroom and shot 6 more.

Lanza also shot 7 adults, but I have not got any data on how he did that. Per the media, he then killed himself (but a later Connecticut State Police Report said the police killed him). The Newtown Police Department was 2 minutes away, but it took them 20 minutes to get there, and they waited 6 minutes before entering the building.

One odd feature of the story was similar to the Dunblane event, where the parents of the deceased children were not allowed to go see their child for five hours. At Sandy Hook they were not allowed to see them at all. Late at night on Saturday, the bodies were removed.

Physical Evidence

The theme of this article is that one doesn’t have much to work with in trying to decide if the massacre really took place. So here is my inventory of what you might expect to have at hand to work with but, sorry, ain’t got:

*Interviews with eyewitnesses to the actual shooting,

*Videos of the parents entering the school,

*Videos of the full student population, almost 500, as they departed school that day,

*Names of the 20 kids, appearing in the Social Security Death Index (I don’t mean you get rebuffed, as Halbig does when he asks impertinent questions; the SSDI is public.  The names of the 20 children are, however, not on it, nor on the Federal Master list.),

*Photos of blood stains on the floor

*Interview with the janitor who reportedly helped lock classroom doors

*Interviews with Peter Lanza who lost both his son Adam, the gunman and his ex-wife, Nancy Lanza. (It is rumored that such an interview did appear on YouTube but is now gone),

*Interviews with Ryan Lanza, Adam’s brother, whose ID was found in Adam’s pocket.

*Photos of the deceased children or adults

*Cell phone records of Adam Lanza

*Email history of Adam Lanza (maybe Wikileaks has it!),

*Videos of the kids running up the street (such as the 6 who ended up in the nearby yard of Gene Rosen),

*Hospital records of emergency care,

*Autopsy reports (these are under seal),

*Photos of bullets on the floor of the school, or bullet holes in the wall,

*Photos of the dead body of the gunman,

*DNA tests to prove anyone’s identity,

*Fingerprints on the gun or Lanza’s steering wheel,

*Interview with the school nurse

*Interview with the school principal or deputy

*Video from school surveillance camera

*Audio from anyone’s cell phone

*Evidence of bullets at Nancy Lanza’s house (since razed)

*Photos of the three wounded persons

*Trial transcripts (no trial)

The Iconic Photo

Although we have not seen the 27 things in the above list, many people think they did see a lot. They did in fact see videos of funeral processions, interviews with bereaved parents, commentators on the need for gun control, psychologists analyzing Adam Lanza (by proxy, as it were), and anything a TV show could think of to mark the event.

Most of all, people seem to remember that they saw the children running out of the school, crying. Here is the “iconic” photo, which was carried on the front page of newspapers around the world:

But it has since been learned that this was not taken on the day. We can be sure it was a photo-op arranged on some other occasion, as there is a simultaneous shot of these kids and the policewoman, taken from a few feet behind this cameraman. It shows parents standing, casually watching this photographing.  (It is not known what caused the girl in the blue sweater to cry.)

Conclusion

Of course, I cannot conclude anything from the list in this article other than the fact that the paucity of evidence is itself remarkable. When there is a major car crash, news photographers are there fast to get a picture of the mangled cars. Here they may well have not wanted to show deceased children, but they could have grabbed the joyful scene of a parent reunited with a survivor child.

For now, the Sandy Hook case is unsolved. The FBI provided a report in 2013 but it is heavily redacted. It is up to American citizens to check out the story. This need not take the form of insulting the families, or “harassing” state officials.

It would help if some wealthy soul would offer a Reward for any significant whistleblowing. Or if some of the kids who were in the school that day would tell the public what they saw. Kids who were 10 years old then are 18 now. We would be grateful for their pluck.

SHARE

33 COMMENTS

  1. The school had been closed for over a year. There were no children. The school was in need of major repair before it could be reopened. Just like the twin towers except that was an insurance fraud. AND I still like the VicSims theory of September Clues which makes more sense than the families of 3,000 just settling for the mainline narrative of the perpertators. But then again, half seems stupid enough to believe there a pandemic.

  2. The Sandy Hook incident falls under what I call the Massacre Moments-a glut of similar massacres in a rather short length of time. Living 70 years on this planet, I have noticed patterns of particular types of violence, starting with serial killers that seemed to spring up from nowhere in the early-mid 60s and peak in the 80. Not that there weren’t serial killers before, nor none after, because there were.
    Then in the 90s school shootings reared their ugly Medusa heads and peak about the time of Sandy Hook. After that began seemingly unconnected incidents like Boston, military bases, churches. In all of this, with only a smattering of exceptions (Manson clan, Boston for example) was the magic “lone gunman” scenario.
    Overlapping these were/are the, again, “lone gunman” shooters who assassinated political figureheads. Imo, this forms a 3D layered predictability pattern.
    Saying all that, I do believe that at least some of the killings weren’t lone gunman, such as Lee Harvey Oswald, and some of them were false flag, like Boston. I also believe that either Sandy Hook was a non event, or committed by someone or ones than Adam Lanza. I readily admit that much of my belief is based on my personal feelings that something’s off-way off-with the whole shmeggeggi. Can’t put my finger on it, but it’s there: something probably buried in the pentagon catacombs, or in the puzzle palace or even that special facility in Utah for all that information they have gathered-and continue gathering mountains of info on us.
    Will we ever know? Nope. Or at least 99.99999999% nope. Such is life on NWO ruled planet earth.

  4. Sorry to digress in another direction, but this is in fact related. You are talking about a PlausIble Credibility test case, one of many.

    The “Metaverse” represents an imaginary (literary) 1992 concept of living in a cyber world which, one day, I believe will be compared with Brave New World and Animal Farm as predictive.

    I have been poking around looking for what is the 20th element of the New World Order agenda.

    And to clarify that statement, a decade ago, I built a website (oziz4oziz.com/ “How Australia was Globalised”) that explained the 17 identified elements of the Globalisation Programme. To put this in perspective, Israel Shamir’s editor told me he had until then identified only 9.

    Come the scandemic, it is now clear that the covid global fabrication is number 18 and the programme of installing totalitarian governments is number 19. Knowing well the Rothschild penchant for numerology (their own twisted version), I knew there had to be a number 20. I now consider this to be the Metaverse.

    To explain… China was destroyed and controlled with opium, the primary trader of which was the shadowy Sassoon Dynasty. I now think the Sassoons have invested in the new opium, the Metaverse, but with a vastly expanded market, and also co-investors (Gates, Zuckerberg, Rockefeller, et al)

    Long convoluted story reduced to one sentence, the world’s plebian population is to be reduced to a state of barely survivable slavery; ie total and unescapable misery, sadistically enhanced; to be made bearable with directly imported (into our minds) visons/experiences that are orgiastic in intensity (hence the graphene oxide and other bioelectronic transmitters). Actually, you can do this with the drug Romalar, albeit only for five hours.

    This makes opium look like the tool of troglodytes.

    The world has an opportunity to terminate this programme by abandoning Facebook and similar platforms. I suspect somebody just tried this yesterday, succesfully, for six hours. I also suspect this was the same shadowy entity that slammed Murdoch’s head into the wall with News of The World a few years back. His/her tracks were covered very professionally.

    This hypothesis places recent events into a new and clearly interrelated perspective.

    Bearing in mind, my predictions are notoriously unreliable. Eg. Each year, the Aborigines in Kakadu would ask me if the Wet Season was going to be early or late. They knew that whatever I predicted would be the opposite of the eventual reality. I was famous as an inverted soothsayer, so be warned.

    • Tony,
      You’ve written it true in oziz4oziz, above comment good primer for a factual read, how this mess came to be. Thank you

  5. The claim that Port Arthur & Dunblane were “inside jobs” does nothing but detract from the fact that both were used to accommodate scurrilous political agendas.

    Stitching up innocent individuals is, and always has been another facet of maintaining control: winning populous confidence depends on the Po being seen as being on top of everything

    • The “holes” in Sandy Hook need to be assessed on the basis that it was, at very best, a total flop re actuating civilian disarmament

  8. Reading the replies is rather ‘refreshing’ to me. I was doing research on the gun control agenda by the mid-1980s. When Hoddle Street and Queen Street massacres happened, I was already moving up to speed on misinformation in the media. Then came Strathfield Mall and there was heaps of things that were going on. Then finally Port Arthur.

    I kept trying to inform people, the media, politicians – anybody. I not only got a rejection of the information, but I was demonized for going against the MSM/government narrative. – Now there is a significant shift, if you are stupid enough to believe the narrative, then you are prima facie stupid enough to be eliminated from the gene pool. – It took a while, but it is pleasant to see happening.

    • Now there is a significant shift, if you are stupid enough to believe the narrative, then you are prima facie stupid enough to be eliminated from the gene pool. – It took a while, but it is pleasant to see happening.

      Harsh, but fair.

  9. Oh God! the moronosphere has encroached upon my community. My wife has a medical appointment with the doctor that visits once a week. We just got a call that she has to sit outside with a mask on because she is UNVACCINATED! – Outside in a rural, fresh air, blue sky, community with a stupid mask on.

    Fucking morons, nice people, but fucking morons. Hopefully by the end of the year they will either have wised up or died from the ‘vax’. At this point I’d prefer if they just dried up and died. More food and less stupid for me.

      • Not a chance. She receives the ordinary medicare fee for a visit, PLUS a fee for everyone she vaccinates.

        We were in her ‘office’ when she asked us if we wanted to be vaccinated. I replied no, but the wife waffled a bit and said she might, but then deferred to me (I’m her ‘excuse’ in situations like this). I said “your body, your choice, but I’d prefer you don’t get vaccinated.”

        The doctor was sitting right next to us, I then said to the wife, “The vaccination doesn’t give you any protection.” – The doctor was sitting right there and didn’t say a word. She knew it was all bullshit, but kept quiet. – The money is too good….

        • onya Terry, the mrs and i just watched a james corbett video..
          ****https://www.corbettreport.com/solutionswatch-vaccinemandates/

          goes for about an hour, basically just says to do exactly what you are doing already.. as Mary and many others here would also perhaps say, “JUST SAY NO!”

          if it comes to the worst, we will pack up the camper trailer and look for a community of like minded people and create our own new world order..

          the mrs also overheard a dr at work talking about the moderna shit to other staff, and in her words thought he heard him say something along the lines of, “why would ya?”

          maybe there is some hope. –

          i love the smell of organic garlic in the morning! 🙂

  12. There are bullet holes shown in the crime scene photos. Fetzer’s theory on that is the hole were drill marks, not from gunshots. A Theory he cannot prove.

    Halbig had his chance, but he settled his part of the Connecticut lawsuit.

C'mon Leave a Reply, Debate and Add to the Discussion

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.