Home Conspiracy Sandy Hook, Part 6: Who Can Be Punished for the Deaths?

Sandy Hook, Part 6: Who Can Be Punished for the Deaths?

30
Cemetery scene on first anniversary of the Sandy Hook massacre, 2013, Photo:  Real Stories at YouTube.com

My theory of the decline of America in the period 1980-2020 is that all the government criminals who have harmed the nation enjoy protection from prosecution by the corrupt Dep’t of Justice. Therefore, I try to take every opportunity to point out who is eligible for punishment, and under what law or constitutional provision.

(Equally, I like to zoom in on the many wrongful punishments that have been meted out to whistleblowers, including the punishment of being “bumped off,” but I will save that for Part 7.)

Federal Crimes

The US Constitution did not foresee much in the way of punishments for criminals (which is a state matter).  The Framers in 1787 did not grant any police power to the federal government except in cases of a few crimes: treason, counterfeiting, piracy, and violations of the law of nations. The Thirteenth Amendment, in 1865, added slavery to the list of crimes.

The fact that there is now a huge prosecutorial function of the “US Attorney” has to do with Congress cooking up “federal crimes” such as related to drugs and terrorism. Naughty behaviors have also been defined by statutes related to IRS, the EPA, or even Fish and Wildlife. (Hook the wrong fish, you might go to jail.)

One never sees the DoJ prosecuting the sex slavery of minors, even though at 18 USC 1591 it is punishable for 15 years up to life in prison.  Recall the Mann Act, which federalized the crime of taking of a woman across state borders for sex — it is seen to fit under Article I, sec 8, Clause 3, a.k.a. the Commerce Clause: “Congress shall have power to …  regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states, and with the Indian tribes.”

Impeachment

The Constitution, however, is big on punishing office holders by means of removing them. Any president, vice president, federal judge, military officer, and other appointed bureaucrats can be impeached by the House of Representatives and then tried by the Senate. Eight judges have lost their bench this way. No president has been removed from office (though Clinton came close in 1998).

A Cabinet member need not be impeached, as his boss can pink-slip him at any time. I believe the Attorney General is not a Cabinet member, and is impeachable.  Certainly his underling, the FBI Director, is. (A quick way to know who is impeachable is whether their nomination for the job was Senate-confirmed.) A state can do impeachments, too, if its constitution says so.

The Attorney General and FBI Director when the Sandy Hook massacre occurred cannot be impeached as they are no longer in office:

(L) Eric Holder (with President Obama) was US Atty General from 2009 to 2015, Photo: Boston Globe (R) Robert Mueller was FBI Director from 2001 to 2013

Note: the FBI made a report of the Sandy Hook massacre, but it is “heavily redacted.  One must ask Why?”

Blackstonian Law and Statutes of Limitations

At both the state and federal level, members of government — as well as citizens — can be criminally punished for Obstruction of Justice in various forms. I call this Blackstonian Law. Sir William Blackstone’s 1769 book Commentaries on the Laws of England was well read by the American colonists, and no doubt will soon again be read by up-in-arms citizens, given the reckless criminality of government during the pandemic.

Examples of Blackstonian crimes are: tampering with evidence, influencing jurors, suborning perjury, and threatening a witness. Abuse of process is also a crime — don’t try to use court procedure to accomplish a goal other than justice. (Oh, my.)

Now to the matter of Statute of Limitations. One cannot prosecute a miscreant after a certain time — in Connecticut it is five years; in some places it is seven years.  But there is no statute of limitations on murder and treason.  As far as lawsuits (civil actions) are concerned, the “stat of lim” is usually 2 years.

Note that a statute is a statute — thus a legislature can change it at any time. I propose that all 50 states and Congress modify their currents stat-of-lim to say that in cases where the government is the accused, the tolling of time begins when information that was hidden by government (e.g., is “classified”) becomes available. Otherwise, we are letting the government impudently hide its criminality.

Sandy Hook — Persons Connected to the Event

This is Part 6 of my series on Sandy Hook. I have been fence-sitting as to the issue of “Did the 20 Children Really Die?”.  I think there is a lot to suggest that they did not die, but for purposes of discussing punishment I do not have enough data to accuse So-and-So of staging a false massacre. Perforce, I will take as the baseline the official story that 20 kids and 6 adults were shot dead in the school.

(Pardon me, let’s make that 5 adults, as one of the six, Dawn Hochsprung, the 47-year-old school principal, was subsequently sighted in New York, I believe.  Not sure, but I’d rather go for the minimum.)

Sandy Hook Elementary School principal,Dawn Hochsprung, Photo: Reuters

 

 

Two other people are sometimes included to make a total of 28, namely Adam Lanza, killed by police, and Nancy Lanza killed by her son. I will not include Nancy here; I have some doubt that she died, even if all the children did die.

So what crimes, if any, were committed at Sandy Hook school on December 14, 2012?  Mainly, the homicide of the 25 people.  It’s unlikely that Adam Lanza was the murderer and therefore the murderer is still at large. (There are no photos or video of Adam’s presence on campus that day, and no forensic stuff either — see Part 5 of this series).

Note: to weed out the real killer, or exonerate the falsely accused, does not mean that the official record will change!. James Earl Ray is still written in textbooks as the killer of Martin Luther King in 1968, even though a court case (King v Jowers) proved otherwise. Lee Harvey Oswald is still, ridiculously, credited with the 1963 assassination of JFK.

My reason for thinking Adam did not do it, has to do with my background as a student of the Port Arthur massacre and the Dunblane massacre. Those two cases took place within six weeks of each other in 1996.

We know that the shooter at Dunblane, Scotland was someone other than the alleged killer, Thomas Hamilton (“who then turned the gun on himself” — how implausible!). Lord Burton later spilled the beans on his colleagues in the Freemasons and the Speculative Society as the planners of this murder of 16 children and their teacher.  Lord Robertson, a local, seem to have had some involvement — in 1999 he became Sec’y General of NATO! See my article on that.

Now back to my other “study” — the Port Arthur massacre in Tasmania, Australia. As discussed in Part 1 of this Sandy Hook series, media was given the public a photo of Adam Lanza that was photoshopped to make his eyes look wild.  The same was done to Martin Bryant at Port Arthur.

Who needs it? A regular mugshot would do, if the man (Martin or Adam) was really the killer.  I mean, if media has to fool you to think Adam Lanza is a crazy man, he probably is not a crazy man. If media has to fool you that he is killer material, media probably knows it is someone else. Eh?

In any case we need to charge someone with the 25 murders at Sandy Hook, and there is no statute of limitation on murder.

I would also charge media with the crime of fraud, for that misrepresentation of Adam Lanza — but, as noted, there is a 5-year statute of limitations, so it is too late.

What about Civil Actions?

As for bringing civil actions against the Connecticut government, it is also too late.  Besides, Connecticut is a sovereign state and can legally prevent suits against it. (A plaintiff files for “leave to sue” and this is often granted.) I have in mind a family suing the government for wrongful death of the loved one, be it a child or adult.

One attorney, Irving Pinsky, attempted to bring a case of negligence against the State Board of Education, for not providing a safe setting for students at Sandy Hook. His client, “Jill Doe,” had heard the gunfire and screaming.  He sued for a million dollars, but — according to CNN: “a flurry of online comments – many of which surfaced on Pinsky’s Facebook page – blasted the potential lawsuit and accused Pinsky and his client of trying to profit from last month’s tragedy.” So he withdrew the case.

Speaking of money, one person was criminally charged with using a Donations page to harvest some dough.  Apparently she had nothing to do with the tragedy.

If money is still coming in, or is still being improperly spent, the statute of limitations for that may perhaps still be running. It is also the case that if any charity is breaking IRS’s rules there is room for prosecutorial action.

Much money came in to Sandy Hook through the United Way.  As far as I know, it did not get distributed to the families of deceased children, or to the three injured survivors. It was given to organizations that could promote gun control and mental health.

Note: By contrast, a Congressional payout to victims of 911 — payable on the signing of a promise not to sue — was handed to each family, at an average amount of $2 million per deceased victim.  The One Fund — donated by corporations — handed above $1 million to each of the amputees after the Boston Marathon bombing. Both of those funds were administered by Kenneth Feinberg.

Conclusion

I think justice has not been done in regard to the 2012 massacre. Even apart from the controversy over the “reality” of the event, normal police procedure was not carried out.

There could not be a court trial for Adam Lanza since he was killed at the site, but this leaves the public with no proof that he was the gunman. Had Lanza been prosecuted for homicide, the state would need to show that he had the means the motive, and the weapon. There is no forensic proof of his presence there that day, and no evidence of his prior skill with guns (the kill-to-wounded ratio at the Sandy Hook massacre was that of a top-class marksman).

As for a motive, it is not enough to say that a crazy boy decides to kill a lot of children.

I call for a search for the real murderer.

SHARE

30 COMMENTS

  2. Alex Jones says he was pilloried for investigating this and making some comments based on hearsay. Seems he backed off it. But if the authorities want to get themselves right off the “hook” they can just use the time-honoured tactic of engaging an old incoherent, unintelligible guy who doesn’t make any sense for a while until he goes under the bus – problem solved. We had a very successful politician in Queensland called “Joh”, later “Sir Joh” which means he is owned by the Queen. (different queen). Speaking of the queen… “Cor, Mum, that was a close one”. £££ fixed everything.
    But I digress, here is a nice quick video of an old unintelligible guy in the role, doing his stuff:
    https://nationalfile.com/biden-the-ohio-pennsylvania-the-ohio-pennsylvania-from-pennsylvania-the-uh-the-uh-illinois-president-of-the-don-harmon/

    • What’s this ‘we’ shit? Have you ever worked with a bunch of cowards before? “Don’t worry, we’re right behind you!” – ‘behind you’ means they are freaking over the horizon behind you.

      This culture has collapsed, it deserves what awaits it.

    • OK, I have read Lanza’s bio. Bob, I suspect you are American. Most on this website are ‘Strayan. So we are familiar with Martin Bryant (now age 50, in prison since 1996). He too has a “CV” of doing many weird things, but very likley it is BS.

      Martin Bryant was “created,” so to speak, by the CIA or its Aussie equivalent. Oh, come to think of it, his trainer was Dr Eric Dax who relocated from UK to live in the wilds of Tassie for purposes we can only guess. Dax was high-level Tavistock.

      An insider lent us a report of how Martin got handled as “fodder” in 1988. You will be shocked if you don’t already know this stuff. I was shocked but now it is “par for the course” in my life — I’ve got the message.

      Would not surprise me if Adam Lanza was of this type. I’ll read it to you on a video:

      • I know nothing about Martin Bryant and that case, so I won’t comment.

        Back to Lanza, at the end of the article you say you want a search for the real murderer. What evidence is there that anyone else did it? The Bushmaster rifle found in the school was purchased by Nancy Lazna. the bullets found in the school matched that gun. Lanza was found dead in the school. All that points to Lanza committing the crime. That’s without the evidence that the state police has locked away.

          • They collected the evidence at the school and the Lanza home. Once the investigation was over, the evidence was locked away. If anymore investigation is required they can get the evidence out and look at it again.

          • The prohibition on blood & guts pics goes to the fact that the current World System is being held together by way of obscuring ground floor reality across the board

  6. No argument on my part that all the reported fatalities did take place
    What does strike me as unlikely is that a firearm would be used by anyone who was in the midst of a psychotic episode
    The scenario was far more indicative of some sort of Mafia-style vendetta
    But, as everyone knows, the Po are never on top of organised crime
    Most “lone-nutjob-went-on-a- bender-before-being-shot-dead-by-police” reports strike me as being highly sus
    Such individuals are more likely to just get in a car and plow into a crowd like so:

  7. Lots of countries have plenty of guns in private hands but you don’t see these massacres, the events in the US all have a different flavour. In Australia (Melbourne) they had two separate massacres both in about 1988 and then the big one Port Arthur about a decade later.
    They all seem contrived. In other countries they have domestic murders, they have organised militias, but they don’t seem to have massacres aimed at undermining he 2nd amendment.
    The US is in a unique position of being the dominant power in the world and the government therefore needs restraint which can only be provided by a very well armed civilian force.
    The got rid of guns quickly in Australia and even more quickly in NZ and that event was totally bogus. No discussion of massacres could be complete without this documentary:
    http://www.thecrowhouse.com/max_igan_on_christchurch.html

    • “There are 4 indisputable points contained within the shooters video that very clearly prove the government and media is lying. My main concern now, is that these 4 very important points are being deliberately covered in smoke, noise and misdirection by highly speculative claims of fakery, CGI shell casings, mannequins and hoaxes, all of which are speculation and conjecture, none of which can be proven, and all of which are obscuring the very real evidence the shooters video actualy reveals.”

      The same issue crops up all the time and although the effect is obviously that of counterintelligence, in my view the vessels are mostly unaware that they’re serving any such cause. It just doesn’t appear to be commonly understood that the best way of undermining a case is to lump salient fact and wild conjecture into the same doughball

    • “The US is in a unique position of being the dominant power in the world and the government therefore needs restraint which can only be provided by a very well armed civilian force.”

      I’d say that was the case with Switzerland and Israel but the U. S. is an entirely different ballgame. whereas federation couldn’t have been achieved without it the whole thrust was to minimise federal power.

      • whereas federation couldn’t have been achieved without the 2nd amendment the whole thrust of said clause was to minimise federal power.

      • Swiss citizens seem to probably be almost uniquely brainwashed, and in the same way as Australians, Australian citizens are used to getting a good deal relative to the rest of the world, the populations are small and harmless, they can be dispensed with anytime, but for now it suits the leadership’s purposes to keep them happy, compliant and cooperative with their little red / blue party illusion, zigzagging us toward the predetermined destination of total control and subservience.
        So many vested interests, peel off the layers like an onion. At the centre of it all is survival of the individual, that comes 1st, 2nd family, 3rd tribe etc That would be why some people walk out of freemasonry for example. They think they can get a better deal outside of it. George Washington seems to have been one such. David Bowie seems to have been another. And we are all hoping and expecting that Trump is/was too. You’re allowed to walk out so long as you keep all the secrets. David Bowie had a fascination with 1984 and themed one album around it. He seemed to know something about the scamdemic planning too since he wrote a song early in his career called “5 years – that’s all we’ve got” which is apparently about the public going into shock after learning about their upcoming demise, this was written around 50 years ago.
        The infiltration of the US has been a long process and only suited to the very patient.
        The substitution of “medicine” for religion, the total usurpation of the MSM and BigTech, the establishment of the debt economy, it hasn’t arrived purely by accident, it was all strategised, and we were informed along the way, by such luminaries as HW Bush with his Sept 11 1991 speech “The NWO will happen”.
        I think the Swiss public for all their military service etc get their credits from the bank and are probably more securely locked into the system than any nationality. They are probably an experiment in itself. The Swiss Guard at the Vatican is basically a comedy. The “Gnomes of Zurich”, another jest. Everyone is stitched up by the debt economy.
        The “hand to mouth” economy has been hybridised with the dangling carrot.

C'mon Leave a Reply, Debate and Add to the Discussion

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.