Thank You, Virginia Guiffre (1983-2025)

by Mary W Maxwell

Virginia Guiffre was born in California in 1983 and later arrived in Australia by way of marriage. She died near Perth, Western Australia on ANZAC Day, April 25, 2025, at age 41.  This short article is meant in praise of her standing up against her abusers.

Her death is disputed. I have no way to penetrate the powerful group that runs sex-trafficking so I’m willing to listen to any of the following interpretations of her death (or her “death,” as the case may be). Here are seven possibilities:

1. She died of suicide, which is usually a result of depression.
2. She died of programmed suicide. (That is, she really pulled the trigger, or jumped into the river, or whatever, but it was because of a message that had been planted in her head. This is known to be part of MK-Ultra or Tavistock training.)
3. She died from injuries related to a recent bus collision.
4. She died from other natural causes (e.g., cancer).
5. She did not die, but is voluntarily in hiding.
6. She did not die, but has been kidnapped by the baddies.
7. She was murdered.

It’s not for me to get involved in investigating her death. I have investigated other deaths, such as at the Port Arthur massacre in Australia in 1996 and the Sandy Hook school shooting in Connecticut in 2012. (See my books on those, downloadable at my website.) I can say with complete confidence that in those two cases:

1. The MSM (mainstream media) lied, lied, and lied.
2. The MSM never acted journalistically to uncover the truth.
3. Governmental law enforcement played no role in apprehending the guilty.
4. The judiciary played the role of creating more lies.
5. The standard features of a psy-op were present.
6. Whistleblowers were punished.

Isn’t that a nice kettle of fish?

Virginia Guiffre Spoke Out

As we all know, the abuse of children for sex and other purposes, such as porn and blackmail, is rampant.  Dee McLachlan’s book, “The Child Protection Racket,” focuses on the participation in sex trafficking of the social work industry, at the state level in four Australian states. She found that the agencies purporting to look out for the welfare of children play a much more sinister role. And that in the Family Court, the abused child’s mother typically get unfairly blamed. A typical judge appears to have nothing happening between his two ears while the case proceeds.

Virginia Roberts (that’s the maiden name of Ms Guiffre) broke new ground by coming forth in a 2019 lawsuit in which she sued Jeffrey Epstein, Prince Andrew, and Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz, better known as ‘Dersh.’ This lawsuit is of great value to other victims, as it shows the possibility of using a civil action, where there will predictably never be a criminal action against the abusers.

The outcome (I have not researched the details) is that Prince Andrew made an out-of-court settlement, and Epstein got arrested. As for the suit against Dersh, Virginia withdrew her accusation, saying she may have made a mistake.

Prostitution?

It seems to me that Virginia was a prostitute, an intentional sex worker. According to the narrative she was working in Mar-a-lago and got picked up by the Epstein enterprise. She was 17 which technically might make the case for “child sex abuse.” However, it was a business deal, which is not true of the kids who get trafficked. She voluntarily went to work for Jeffrey Epstein, and his business partner Ghislaine Maxwell.

Others at Epstein Island or at Epstein’s many mansions, have said they were approached with an offer to become highly paid models. I can see how that might trick someone, but pretty soon the request for massage services would creep in and then full sex. At that point I imagine the girl could walk away. She may then be offered a high salary but could say No. Maybe sone girls did say No. 

It is normal for a 17-year-old to have sex voluntarily, isn’t it?  Plenty of teen girls at this moment are having sex with their boyfriends, where no money or coercion is involved. That fact of life was often used in court whenever a true victim of sex abuse tried to make a case.  Having not read Virginia’s case, I don’t know if she said she was coerced. But if 18 is the legal minimum, and she sued someone for having taken advantage of her, she could technically win.

Crimes Galore

I have never heard that Ms Guiffre said was a mind-control victim. But many girls who ended up at Epstein’s locations were under some form of mind-control. This makes for criminality on the part of the sex perpetrator and all associated with his sex business, plus also all those who originally subjected the girl (or boy) to mind control, for that – as a separate crime.

By the way I have heard that Epstein was clearly a victim of MK-Ultra himself.

I am very interested in the prosecution of mind-controllers. And who might be charged?  Two of the cases mentioned at the beginning of this article, the Port Arthur massacre and the Sandy Hook (totally fictional) school shooting, can shed light here. Law enforcement personnel and media had to be well-trained to oversee a psy-op. Yes, I am saying that a psy-op is criminal. At the very least it can be categorized under the crime of fraud.

That’s all I can say in this “obituary” for Virginia Guiffre. Since it is too late to thank her directly, I say thanks to her ghost, hoping that other women who stepped up to the plate will know that such efforts are appreciated. The full power of society acts against them.  Citizens prefer to stay silent or, sadly, to outright reject claims of child-trafficking.

As for how she died, my own best guess is murder. And by the way, I am under the impression that I am “on the list.”

Is there some reason why US Attorney General Pam Bondi or US Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard is not “releasing the Epstein files”?

Huh?

— Mary Maxwell is a graduate of Adelaide Law School and has run for Congress. Her website is www.ConstitutionAndTruth.com.  Her books on the subject of child abuse include Deliverance and Judging the Family Court. Her book Society Is the Authority is about the unfair court case of Dr Russell Pridgeon and Patrick O’Dea.  O’Dea has outrageously been imprisoned for his noble work.