Home Corona The First Vax Genocide Was the Balmis “Philanthropic” Expedition in 1804

The First Vax Genocide Was the Balmis “Philanthropic” Expedition in 1804

71
President Gerald Ford gets a swine flu vaccination in 1976
President Gerald Ford gets a swine flu vaccination in 1976

by Mary W Maxwell, LLB

Thanks be to God, the dirt has finally come out. I am referring to the hefty video proof of “Sudden Adult Death Syndrome” — SADS. I didn’t think I would live to see such evidence of a government crime like that, did you?

I know of many governmental crimes related to medicine and will sketch some of them here.

Most have got only circumstantial evidence, but the new 2022 video scenes of death, presumably following a Covid vax, ought to make it easier to recognize earlier crimes.  As we say in Australia, the penny will drop.

The legislation that protects wrongdoers, i.e., The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 (the NCVI), needs to be repealed by Congress right away.  We need to see which Congresspersons refuse to repeal it before we step into the polling booth on November 8, 2022.

For that matter, we need to see which legislators will propose and sponsor the bill. Maybe they don’t know that back in the Middle Ages of 1986 the excuse given for removing liability from Big Pharma was that it may cause them to end their vax manufacturing as unprofitable.  Poor things.  That was before Bill Gates let slip that his financial return on vaccines is twenty-to-one.

Note:  The rules of admissibility of evidence can be changed by legislation, subject always to the due process rights in the US Constitution.

I’ll give a list of vaccine scandals, and then mention who is behind all this. And most importantly what we can do about it — this week!

Vaccine from 1798 to 1918

The very first episode of immunization in Western countries, Dr Edward Jenner’s alleged invention of the alleged smallpox vaccine in England in 1798, was dishonest. Briefly, it is said that he noticed that milk maids were getting sores on their hands which he deduced was from their touching the udders of cows who had the pox. No, not monkeypox, cow pox.

Is there such a thing?  Jenner allegedly got a company to make the relevant vaccine, but many years later, when a fabulous investigator, Charles Creighton, MD of Aberdeen, tried to trace that substance, he got nowhere.  I have published my evidence as to the fakery of Jenner in two of my books, Consider the Lilies (2013) and Balm in Gilead (2014). For today I ask you to take it from me that smallpox vaccine is fraudulent.

Britain then made the vax mandatory. Each doctor got paid (from the rates) for inoculating. It wasn’t exactly by needle at first.  One child with smallpox put his arm against the other child. In the US President Jefferson participated by ‘officializing’ the transport of the stuff via Post Offices. There was a big inquiry in UK in 1898, which Alfred Russell Wallace studied and found to be your basic crock.

Anyway, let’s move now to the Balmis Expedition. What if I told you that the King of Spain was so interested in people’s health that he sent doctors to every highway and byway in South America and the Philippines, to give the inoculation. Would you believe me? What if I added that this was during the Napoleonic Wars when he must have a lot else on his mind?

I had better come to my point.  I say the spread of smallpox vaccine in UK, US, and many other places was malicious. I say it brought diseases, perhaps later in life, to the recipients. As everyone knows, the Hawaiian island of Molokai has many people who are lepers. But this was not so until the smallpox vaccination reached Hawaii. Note: a disease is not a thing in itself “Oh, he’s got leprosy, she’s got diabetes.” It’s an observation of something having gone wrong in the normally wonderful human body.

The precedent from the US Supreme Court is the 1905 case of Hennig Jacobson. His town in Massachusetts mandated smallpox vaccination.  He refused to take it so had to pay a fine of $5. This was upheld as being properly within a state’s authority to look out for the public’s health. (Note: he was not, however, forced to submit to a vax.)

The 1918 Flu

The CDC website offers this on the 1918 flu:

“It was caused by an H1N1 virus with genes of avian origin. Although there is not universal consensus regarding where the virus originated … it was first identified in military personnel in spring 1918…. The number of deaths was estimated to be at least 50 million worldwide with about 675,000 occurring in the United States. … The high mortality in healthy people, including those in the 20-40 year age group, was a unique feature of this pandemic.”

Hmm. Did no one figure out why?

Dr William Crompton, in Dublin, knew how to cure influenza and he did so.  Also, veterinarians knew how to cure distemper in dogs since 1910, and microbiologist Edward Rosenow, at the Mayo Clinic, knew how to cure polio in 1917. The secret for all three has to do with the fact that a virus can morph into a bacillus, which can be cultured and used as a cure. This is called pleomorphism.

Those cures were subsequently lost. Dogs now get mandatorily vaccinated. How can later generations of doctors have never heard of cures that were well known? It’s because John D Rockefeller (perhaps as a front man for Rothschilds) took over the medical schools. No physician is allowed to talk about pleomorphism. But you can be sure it’s talked about and used at Ft Detrick or any bioweapons lab!

Polio Shots (circa 1955), Swine flu shots (1976), Autism (1990s)

I’ll mention these three scandals quickly. Had we acted on them, the great swindle and genocide of ‘Covid’ would not have happened. And why didn’t we act on them? I think it is because we are shy and polite. Also, we have a hard time disagreeing with any statement that seems to come from experts. Of course the media help to enforce this. And doctors do what they are told, mainly because the AMA has ways to control them. (Docs, you are a disgrace!)

There was an outbreak of polio in Australia in 1949 and one in the US in 1955. I think they were deliberate rather than natural, as I also think the recent “outbreak” of polio in Nigeria was deliberate. By 1955, Jonas Salk had invented a vaccine for polio. Parents were lining up to get shots for themselves and their kids. (Recall that polio had been cured by Rosenow in 1917, via his awareness of pleomorphism.)

I believe the point of getting all Americans vaccinated in 1955 was to seed them with material that would later develop into cancer. One of the ingredients of the polio vaccine was “SV40” — simian virus 40. This was supposedly an unintended contaminant, but even after it was found in the vaccine, it was not removed. Cancer, which had not been a frequent illness before 1955, became one by 1970.

Next, we had the swine flu fandangle of 1976. This flu appears to be transmissible from pigs to humans. The government tried to get everyone vaccinated — who knows why? — but there was too much controversy (partly due to people getting Guillain-Barre paralysis) and so the program was stopped. Very good. Thank you, protesters!

The autism scandal began in the 1980s (as did the AIDS scandal). It’s easy to prove that this terrible illness resulted from childhood vaccination. In fact, I think it is sufficient to ponder the new rudeness that mothers of autistic kids received from doctors. In the old days, a mom bringing a rare problem to a doctor would correctly believe that the doctor would search for the cause. But here, she was made fun of.

The so-called discrediting if Dr Andrew Wakefield was a message to all other doctors to NOT take seriously the seemingly great correlation between the onset of autism and the date of a child’s vaccination — especially the MMR, measles, mumps, and rubella. Astonishing as it may be, I believe the autism tragedy was planned and carried out so that families would be frazzled by it. I think some of the planners are so demented as to laugh at those families.

(Conceivably, a different purpose of the autism epidemic was: to satisfy some occult program.)

Covid 2020 and Onwards

So now to SADS, sudden adult death syndrome. It could be stated in one word instead of four: homicide. These deaths were probably caused by the vaccines from Pfizer and Moderna. For the last 2.5 years, the citizenry was put through many confusing rules about Covid, ranging from social distancing and lockdowns to mandatory mask wearing and pressure to get vaccinated. Some could not visit Grandma in hospital, and some grandma’s got put on a ventilator unwillingly. All of that now emerges to have been a game.

Several persons, including myself, filed lawsuits. Mine asked for a restraining order against anyone who would order me to be vaccinated. No case that I know of, so far, is about dying from the vaccine but surely some cases are in the works. Bring them on!  Still, a lawsuit is not the same as a prosecution. It does not use the word “crime.”

We need indictments immediately. I have been watching for years as indictable people get protected from the law. The result of this is that people no longer make an automatic connection between “Hey, we just saw a murder” and “the murderer will soon be arrested.” Unless the murderer is a street criminal, the matter gets hidden away. The media provides some silly reason (stated in a serious tone) as to why the matter won’t proceed.

Please folks, please. We let the JFK murder slip by.  We let the 9-11 mega-murders slip by. In both those cases there were indictable participants galore. Instead of suffering society’s wrath, however, they went on to commit bigger horrors.

Please change your approach so that you don’t let this one slip by. With Covid, a handful of humans has sprung a death plan on much of the human race. Do you feel caught up into acceptance of this? Come on, there are plenty of people who will support you in your resistance to this garbage. Don’t disappoint us by your timidity or by your “looking the other way.”

Listen to what Bill Gates and Klaus Schwab are saying. They speak as if they don’t expect any trouble from you.  Give them a huge surprise!  One of Schwab’s sidekicks, Noah Harari, has gone so far as to say that he sees “on one hand the emergence of a new upgraded elite super humans … and on the other hand a new massive useless class…. How will they find some meaning in life when they are basically meaningless – worthless?”

Well, well, well. Go get a pen and paper and write a list of who is indictable here. The homicide of thousands of vaccinated people is more than enough to start the ball rolling. I have heard of plans to indict for genocide or even for “Crimes against humanity.” I say go for something simpler to start with.

Note: The law of homicide is clear that accomplices are just as guilty as the principal. How about accusing “every employee at Pfizer and every doctor in Indiana.” (I chose Indiana randomly; it’s hard to picture “every doctor in the nation.”)

How about Chris Cuomo? Clearly many media people are indictable. They were not passing on some information to the audience; they were deceiving the audience and stampeding people to get vaccinated. Every time they said “safe and effective,” they were screwing you.

And how about the scientists in the biolabs, and the military protection they get? How about our elected leaders? It is true that they can’t be held liable for decisions they make when legislating. But no person in America has immunity if they commit crime. That includes presidents, senators, mayors, generals, and judges.

Will they be indicting themselves?  No, it’s up to you.

It’s up to you, Indianapolis Indiana.

SHARE

71 COMMENTS

  1. Dee, on Oct 18, 2022 you published “It’s in the Blood” which contained a long clip from GBN. Please source it. Who was able to collect all those surveillance videos of people dying?

    I guess it is slightly possible that the Powers That Be created that video as proof of their invincibility.

    • Excellent recent history explained MM.

      I believe everyone (vaxxed) has the evidence in their blood stream. They should start filling the courts with “discovery”… who got paid to implement this madness.

  2. Psalm 139: 17-22
    How precious also are thy thoughts unto me, O God! how great is the sum of them!
    If I should count them, they are more in number than the grains of sand….
    Surely thou wilt slay the wicked, O God: depart from me therefore, ye bloody men.
    … am not I grieved with those that rise up against thee?
    I hate them with perfect hatred: I count them mine enemies.

    • Thank God,.
      BU has found a way to rid us by 80% of a mice plague.
      Well seems that the report missed other reports that 80% of the mice were dispatched.
      Keep at it BU, improvement needs to be at 100% to satisfy Schrab, Fauci and Gates. (Send another cheque)

  4. This is funny. Found at wrh referring to a government web page.
    Seems that the Australian beneficial government will pay the funeral expenses for those dying from the covid injection.
    No? April the first is long gone.
    There are conditions set out in the web page.
    One is good, a doctor has to report that the deceased died as a result of a covid injection.
    (So family members can go to the injecting doctor and obtain a report that the doctor killed the deceased💁)
    Alternatively, go to another doctor to obtain a report that the government with mass media propaganda killed the deceased💁
    Miserable bastards do not offer anything for the wake. (Waike?)
    Do not get me on to the banning of ivermectin and or hydroxy.
    Be kind to the pollies and shock jokes, invite them to the funerals. They are poor intellectually dumb suckered nincompoops and really care for us.
    Note that a European politician has publicly called for his government’s details of the contracts made by government with the pharma companies.
    What a great idea for transparency. and honest government.
    Come on Albo, TABLE IN PARLIAMENT ANY RELEVANT DOCUMENTS.
    Alternatively, CALL A ROYAL COMMISSION.
    Who profited from banning ivermectin and hcl? Tell us teals⚖️

  8. I want to say somehing abut Brazil later, so am just putting this quote here now to note the dates:

    “In the early 1520s, the Portuguese established a garrisoned trading station at Pernambuco, where sugar cultivation was introduced in 1526. French-Portuguese hostilities along the coast intensified. In 1530, the Portuguese Crown responded by commissioning Martím Afonso de Sousa to begin the process of settlement and colonization, an expedition that in 1532 established the first permanent colony at São Vicente near modern São Paulo.

    “As conflicts with the French grew, in the mid-1530s King João III and his advisers devised the donatory system, which divided the coastland into 15 sections or donatories that extended along imaginary boundaries west into the interior, each to be ruled by a captain or hereditary lord.”

    (I am wondering if the Balmis expedition went into Brazil)

    • This is from connectinhealth.org:

      “The importance of Jenner’s invention shouldn’t be underestimated. Smallpox is an infectious disease that has plagued humanity for millenia, with its earliest appearance dating back to 10,000 B.C.E. Smallpox was introduced to the Americas by Spaniards in the 16th century, where it eliminated 90% of native populations. By 1796, the disease had caused millions upon millions of deaths worldwide, with 400,000 Europeans dying each year. But over 100,000 Europeans were vaccinated by the year 1800 thanks to Jenner’s medical breakthrough.

      “By this time, the news had also reached King Charles IV of Spain, sitting atop the powerful but crumbling Spanish Empire. Charles IV may well have never accomplished anything of importance if his own daughter, the Infanta Maria Teresa, had not succumbed to smallpox.”

      Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose ….

  9. This is the abstract of an article at europepmc.org:

    “Six years after Jenner discovered the anti-smallpox vaccine, King Charles IV mandated the initiation of vaccination campaigns throughout his kingdom. The overseas campaign was coordinated by the Valencian military doctor Xavier de Balmis with the aid of the Catalan Josep Salvany. The vaccine was transported to America “in vivo” in 22 children.

    “The expedition departed from La Coruña on November 1806 and arrived to the Venezuelan port of La Guayra where it was split in two: One sub expedition under the order of Josep Salvany, continued by land to Colombia, Ecuador, Peru and Bolivia. Salvany died in the Bolivian city of Cochabamba. The other sub expedition, leaded by Balmis himself, continued by sea to Cuba and Mexico. From Acapulco it arrived to Manila and from there to Macau followed by inland penetration into China.”

    Oh, and the vaccine was sent “in vivo.” That is 22 orphans went on the journey to be the living inoculators. How many times did they have to have their arm cut? Thousands of times?

    Went into China? The king if Spain is trying to save Chinese children from smallpox? Raise hands anybody who thinks this was a philanthropic mission.

    Here is something to think about. Assuming I’m right that this story is not true, and that the mission was sinister, what kind of men cared enuf to perform that sinister mission? Who could be bothered? But the way, how is it that Fauci-boy could be bothered to do so much harm. Or Gov Andrew “ventilator” Cuomo. Or Chris (bro of gov who worked for CNN). Or Ted Turner. Or Jon Faine. I vaguely suspect that all were mind-controlled even back to 1806.

    There doesn’t even seem to be a financial incentive available for the Balmis crowd.

  11. Welcome to the jungle.

    If you carefully listen, Mary also has been amazon for a long time. Thank you Mary, for your present too.

  12. You left out most of the 19th Century, read Ethel Douglas Hume’s ‘Béchamp or Pasteur’. Tidbits in the book will reveal that Béchamp was the first to see bits of a cell like the mitochondria and nuclei using a fluoroscope which had just been invented. Also, ever wonder why the French are not known for beer production? Pasteur ruined it with his process of Pasteurization (a heat process to kill germs).
    Pasteur also pervert the original germ theory of Béchamp which is best explained as ‘terrain theory’ today.
    Pasteur also promoted vaccines, which was rolled out mostly with livestock and in doing so decimated the livestock industry of Hungary which promptly outlawed vaccines.
    Pasteur was in the pocket of Napoleon III and had just a bachelors degree and Béchamp had 2 doctors degrees and was Dean of Medicine in a French University, his discoveries were deemed “…not profitable” and ignored
    Study Florence Nightengale, in the beginning of the 20th Century she had cared for large numbers of WWI casualties, many sick with the Spanish Flu and being among them never falling ill herself. She believed that fresh air and sunshine was needed and had many patients rolled outside at her hospitals.
    Remember that in WWI what caused illness was the horrific conditions army enlisted men endured. Cramped ships transported them, they started thier enlistment in the winter, in tents with poor rations, suffered feted conditions in trench warfare, little sleep. War kills the soldier with illness more than combat and this is hard info to find but I once heard that it was the vaccinated that died from the ‘Spanish Flu’ more than any other group.
    Unfortunately, the medical industry is best categorized by Mary Shelley’s ‘Frankenstein’ than anything else. People do not think much anymore, an industry that is out of control with costs yet people still trust is the Medical Industry.
    Did you know that Hitler’s ‘compassionate’ response to his people was thru the use of the medical industry? For example he thought the Jews were ‘filthy and unclean’.
    and you know of his experiments in his death camps…

    • When I was very young there were still old soldiers around from ww1, with arms or legs missing and so forth, so it’s easy to see why it would be a good economic and PR move for our governance to be rid of all of them.

    • Ken, your quote, “War kills the soldier with illness more than combat and this is hard info to find ” is INCORRECT. During my service, I was regalled countless times, that illness contracted from living conditions in war zones, was the MAJOR incapaciator of soldiers. I don’t believe that FACT is witheld from anyone. At least it wasn’t witheld from us during the Vietnam war. What is FACT, is people do not really understand what W.A.R. means. A serious hard look at the conditions the people of Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria and today Ukraine are required to live under, might clarify very quickly, why such conditions are dangerous to human AND animal health. But then the supporters of these wars of aggression, couldn’t give a rat’s arse about any of that. Part of their agenda is reduce the World population anyway, so these wars play a serious part in their agenda, besides cancelling debt and making massive amounts of profit. Onething I learnt very early in the game, human lives are expendable and are of no value.

      • You say Ken is INCORRECT
        but then proceed to validate the respective claim, quote, “A serious hard look at the conditions the people of Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria and today Ukraine are required to live under, might clarify very quickly, why such conditions are dangerous to human AND animal health” !

  16. You left out the entire 19th (1800-1899) century except for your title mention.

    Mid-19th Century a Doctor by the name Pierre Jacques Antoine Béchamp a rival and contemporary of Louis Pasteur fought over things like your health. Béchamp was the first human being to see enzymes, nuclei, mitochondria, and other organelles in the cell. He used a fluoroscope recently invented. Like most pioneers he was interested in science, not marketing.
    To be short and not complete, (you need to read the book by Ethel Douglas Hume, Bechamp or Pasteur.
    Bechamp had 2 Doctor degrees was a Dean at a medical school in France while Pasteur had a mere Bacholors Degree in Science. Pasteur was in Napoleon III’s pocket while Bechamp, in addition to his teaching duties, practiced Science on his own time and dime.
    Pasteur stole Bechamp’s ‘Germ Theory’ and perverted it, while Bechamp’s Germ Theory became known as “Terrain Theory”. The word ‘enzyme’ comes from his discover of cellular bits, (nuclei, mitochondria, golgi aparatus, etc) which he called ‘zymas’.
    Hungary outlawed vaccines, promoted by Pasteur due to the decimation of livestock.
    You do not here about Bechamp because his discoveries were deemed unprofitable.
    On Pasteur’s death bed he finally admitted that Bechamp was correct.
    Modern Medicine is more a criminal organization than a benefit to mankind.

  17. 💁🤪💁🤪💁
    20th October 2022.
    Sydney Morning Herald editorial calls for a ROYAL COMMISSION INTO the COVID REACTION.
    Start with publication of all government contracts with all the pharmas killing and screwing Australians.

  18. Australia’s government must have the approval of the American Eagle in that no one is protesting to bring about regime change.

    Thailand: US-backed Opposition’s Violence Intimidates Critics, Paves Way for Regime Change
    29,871 views Oct 19, 2022 The US-backed opposition in Thailand replicates in many ways the violence and intimidation the US sponsored in Ukraine from 2014 onward – just as Ukraine is meant as a proxy against Russia – a US client regime in Thailand would transform the country into a proxy against China.

    An alarming incident of violence where a Thai opposition leader publicly assaulted his critic is dangerously being portrayed as “heroic” by Western-sponsored opposition media to encourage further violence and intimidation – creating the same division and destruction throughout Thai society that is currently consuming Ukraine.

  19. The Secret Covenant: A Member of the Illuminati Tells All

    “An illusion it will be, so large, so vast it will escape their perception.

    “………………“We will keep their lifespan short and their minds weak while pretending to do the opposite. We will use our knowledge of science and technology in subtle ways so they will never see what is happening. We will use soft metals, aging accelerators and sedatives in food and water, also in the air. They will be blanketed by poisons everywhere they turn.

    The soft metals will cause them to lose their minds. We will promise to find a cure from our many fronts, yet we will feed them more poison. The poisons will be absorbed through their skin and mouths, they will destroy their minds and reproductive systems. From all this, their children will be born dead, and we will conceal this information.

    The poisons will be hidden in everything that surrounds them, in what they drink, eat, breathe and wear. We must be ingenious in dispensing the poisons for they can see far. We will teach them that the poisons are good, with fun images and musical tones. Those they look up to will help. We will enlist them to push our poisons.

    “They will see our products being used in film and will grow accustomed to them and will never know their true effect. When they give birth we will inject poisons into the blood of their children and convince them its for their help. We will start early on, when their minds are young, we will target their children with what children love most, sweet things.

    When their teeth decay we will fill them with metals that will kill their mind and steal their future. When their ability to learn has been affected, we will create medicine that will make them sicker and cause other diseases for which we will create yet more medicine. We will render them docile and weak before us by our power. They will grow depressed, slow and obese, and when they come to us for help, we will give them more poison…………………”

    https://www.veteranstoday.com/2022/10/15/a-member-of-the-illuminati-tells-all/?mc_cid=4e0c9df1ea&mc_eid=742c7852b0

  21. There’s been no “Black Plague” since soap, water and sewer systems, the benefits of personal hygiene and nutrition.
    Sickness means nothing to investors unless it affects the “bottom line”. Gates doesn’t vaccinate his own children because he knows the risks.
    The agenda is enslaving survivors to a miserable technocracy programmed by communists. Our naive mass are unaware of the living hell the elite have planned. This satanic oligarchy are abnormal, irritating and depressingly dull.

    People enjoy socialising, we like to gather together, smile, tell jokes and discuss all things. Wearing masks is dehumanising, it’s setting the system so that we become disconnected and totally dependant on computers, like babies to a tit. Online interactions constantly monitored and recorded by beasts, WHO demand we be jacked up with boosters.
    Millions in China are enduring this AI insanity, now it’s our turn. As many cameras as people, all tied to central database “metaverse” at Gore Hill former ABC, state of the kraft artificial insanity.
    Every move analysed, all money digitised, cash gone. If television and AI are eliminated maybe the spell can be broken?

    • quote unquote ant56:

      If you want to know what the human future looks like, think of a boot stamping on the human face forever, right near a Doherty biolab.

        • James 3:12
          “Can the fig tree my brethren, bear olive berries? either a vine, figs? So can no fountain both yield salt water and fresh.”

          Why did God create different races if His final intention was to blend them all together into one rootless mass? Isn’t this exactly what is pushed today?
          Race mixing is tactic number one in satan’s big bang of tricks. The enemy think they can win if they wipe out the Adamic bloodline by genocide, wars and revolutions.

          Who is gathering all wealth into their hands?
          Who are the banksters and corporations?
          Who controls media and science?
          Who’s behind every war?
          Deliberately obliterating the Christian way of life, replacing it with filth, degeneracy, sickness and death, and profiting in trillions.
          Our youth in their prime, herded like sheep onto slaughter fields, killing each other as demons sit and collect.

          Are we steering towards the Biblical flood?

          Jesus said that we would “know them by their fruits”.

  22. The Cancer-Causing Metal Millions Eat, Wear or Have Injected Into Their Kids

    Aluminum is considered by most health authorities perfectly acceptable to eat, wear as an antiperspirant, and inject into your body as a vaccine adjuvant, but research indicates it has cancer-causing properties, even at levels 100,000 times lower than found in certain consumer products……………….”

    https://wakeup-world.com/2013/09/23/the-cancer-causing-metal-millions-eat-wear-or-have-injected-into-their-kids/

  23. Bottom line is, everything is lies, deceptions and false flags of all shapes and sizes, and the end the establishment is working towards is global communism, Australia is halfway there with Nanny State tax and regulations, government “borrowing” and UN “obligations”, slowly but surely putting everyone in a little box no different to a chicken farm.

  24. The story of modern cancer research begins, somewhat improbably, with the sea urchin. In the first decade of the 20th century, the German biologist Theodor Boveri discovered that if he fertilized sea-urchin eggs with two sperm rather than one, some of the cells would end up with the wrong number of chromosomes and fail to develop properly. It was the era before modern genetics, but Boveri was aware that cancer cells, like the deformed sea urchin cells, had abnormal chromosomes; whatever caused cancer, he surmised, had something to do with chromosomes.
    Today Boveri is celebrated for discovering the origins of cancer, but another German scientist, Otto Warburg, was studying sea-urchin eggs around the same time as Boveri. His research, too, was hailed as a major breakthrough in our understanding of cancer. But in the following decades, Warburg’s discovery would largely disappear from the cancer narrative, his contributions considered so negligible that they were left out of textbooks altogether.

    Unlike Boveri, Warburg wasn’t interested in the chromosomes of sea-urchin eggs. Rather, Warburg was focused on energy, specifically on how the eggs fueled their growth. By the time Warburg turned his attention from sea-urchin cells to the cells of a rat tumor, in 1923, he knew that sea-urchin eggs increased their oxygen consumption significantly as they grew, so he expected to see a similar need for extra oxygen in the rat tumor. Instead, the cancer cells fueled their growth by swallowing up enormous amounts of glucose (blood sugar) and breaking it down without oxygen. The result made no sense. Oxygen-fueled reactions are a much more efficient way of turning food into energy, and there was plenty of oxygen available for the cancer cells to use. But when Warburg tested additional tumors, including ones from humans, he saw the same effect every time. The cancer cells were ravenous for glucose.
    Warburg’s discovery, later named the Warburg effect, is estimated to occur in up to 80 percent of cancers. It is so fundamental to most cancers that a positron emission tomography (PET) scan, which has emerged as an important tool in the staging and diagnosis of cancer, works simply by revealing the places in the body where cells are consuming extra glucose. In many cases, the more glucose a tumor consumes, the worse a patient’s prognosis.

    In the years following his breakthrough, Warburg became convinced that the Warburg effect occurs because cells are unable to use oxygen properly and that this damaged respiration is, in effect, the starting point of cancer. Well into the 1950s, this theory — which Warburg believed in until his death in 1970 but never proved — remained an important subject of debate within the field. And then, more quickly than anyone could have anticipated, the debate ended. In 1953, James Watson and Francis Crick pieced together the structure of the DNA molecule and set the stage for the triumph of molecular biology’s gene-centered approach to cancer. In the following decades, scientists came to regard cancer as a disease governed by mutated genes, which drive cells into a state of relentless division and proliferation. The metabolic catalysts that Warburg spent his career analyzing began to be referred to as “housekeeping enzymes” — necessary to keep a cell going but largely irrelevant to the deeper story of cancer.

    “It was a stampede,” says Thomas Seyfried, a biologist at Boston College, of the move to molecular biology. “Warburg was dropped like a hot potato.” There was every reason to think that Warburg would remain at best a footnote in the history of cancer research. (As Dominic D’Agostino, an associate professor at the University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, told me, “The book that my students have to use for their cancer biology course has no mention of cancer metabolism.”) But over the past decade, and the past five years in particular, something unexpected happened: Those housekeeping enzymes have again become one of the most promising areas of cancer research. Scientists now wonder if metabolism could prove to be the long-sought “Achilles’ heel” of cancer, a common weak point in a disease that manifests itself in so many different forms.
    There are typically many mutations in a single cancer. But there are a limited number of ways that the body can produce energy and support rapid growth. Cancer cells rely on these fuels in a way that healthy cells don’t. The hope of scientists at the forefront of the Warburg revival is that they will be able to slow — or even stop — tumors by disrupting one or more of the many chemical reactions a cell uses to proliferate, and, in the process, starve cancer cells of the nutrients they desperately need to grow.

    Even James Watson, one of the fathers of molecular biology, is convinced that targeting metabolism is a more promising avenue in current cancer research than gene-centered approaches. At his office at the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory in Long Island, Watson, 88, sat beneath one of the original sketches of the DNA molecule and told me that locating the genes that cause cancer has been “remarkably unhelpful” — the belief that sequencing your DNA is going to extend your life “a cruel illusion.” If he were going into cancer research today, Watson said, he would study biochemistry rather than molecular biology.
    “I never thought, until about two months ago, I’d ever have to learn the Krebs cycle,” he said, referring to the reactions, familiar to most high-school biology students, by which a cell powers itself. “Now I realize I have to.”

    Born in 1883 into the illustrious Warburg family, Otto Warburg was raised to be a science prodigy. His father, Emil, was one of Germany’s leading physicists, and many of the world’s greatest physicists and chemists, including Albert Einstein and Max Planck, were friends of the family. (When Warburg enlisted in the military during World War I, Einstein sent him a letter urging him to come home for the sake of science.) Those men had explained the mysteries of the universe with a handful of fundamental laws, and the young Warburg came to believe he could bring that same elegant simplicity and clarity to the workings of life. Long before his death, Warburg was considered perhaps the greatest biochemist of the 20th century, a man whose research was vital to our understanding not only of cancer but also of respiration and photosynthesis. In 1931 he won the Nobel Prize for his work on respiration, and he was considered for the award on two other occasions — each time for a different discovery. Records indicate that he would have won in 1944, had the Nazis not forbidden the acceptance of the Nobel by German citizens.

    That Warburg was able to live in Germany and continue his research throughout World War II, despite having Jewish ancestry and most likely being gay, speaks to the German obsession with cancer in the first half of the 20th century. At the time, cancer was more prevalent in Germany than in almost any other nation. According to the Stanford historian Robert Proctor, by the 1920s Germany’s escalating cancer rates had become a “major scandal.” A number of top Nazis, including Hitler, are believed to have harbored a particular dread of the disease; Hitler and Joseph Goebbels took the time to discuss new advances in cancer research in the hours leading up to the Nazi invasion of the Soviet Union. Whether Hitler was personally aware of Warburg’s research is unknown, but one of Warburg’s former colleagues wrote that several sources told him that “Hitler’s entourage” became convinced that “Warburg was the only scientist who offered a serious hope of producing a cure for cancer one day.”

    Although many Jewish scientists fled Germany during the 1930s, Warburg chose to remain. According to his biographer, the Nobel Prize-winning biochemist Hans Krebs, who worked in Warburg’s lab, “science was the dominant emotion” of Warburg’s adult life, “virtually subjugating all other emotions.” In Krebs’s telling, Warburg spent years building a small team of specially trained technicians who knew how to run his experiments, and he feared that his mission to defeat cancer would be set back significantly if he had to start over. But after the war, Warburg fired all the technicians, suspecting that they had reported his criticisms of the Third Reich to the Gestapo. Warburg’s reckless decision to stay in Nazi Germany most likely came down to his astonishing ego. (Upon learning he had won the Nobel Prize, Warburg’s response was, “It’s high time.”)

    “Modesty was not a virtue of Otto Warburg,” says George Klein, a 90-year-old cancer researcher at the Karolinska Institute in Sweden. As a young man, Klein was asked to send cancer cells to Warburg’s lab. A number of years later, Klein’s boss approached Warburg for a recommendation on Klein’s behalf. “George Klein has made a very important contribution to cancer research,” Warburg wrote. “He has sent me the cells with which I have solved the cancer problem.” Klein also recalls the lecture Warburg gave in Stockholm in 1950 at the 50th anniversary of the Nobel Prize. Warburg drew four diagrams on a blackboard explaining the Warburg effect, and then told the members of the audience that they represented all that they needed to know about the biochemistry of cancer.

    Warburg was so monumentally stubborn that he refused to use the word “mitochondria,” even after it had been widely accepted as the name for the tiny structures that power cells. Instead Warburg persisted in calling them “grana,” the term he came up with when he identified those structures as the site of cellular respiration. Few things would have been more upsetting to him than the thought of Nazi thugs chasing him out of the beautiful Berlin institute, modeled after a country manor and built specifically for him. After the war, the Russians approached Warburg and offered to erect a new institute in Moscow. Klein recalls that Warburg told them with great pride that both Hitler and Stalin had failed to move him. As Warburg explained to his sister: “Ich war vor Hitler da” — “I was here before Hitler.”

    Imagine two engines, the one being driven by complete and the other by incomplete combustion of coal,” Warburg wrote in 1956, responding to a criticism of his hypothesis that cancer is a problem of energy. “A man who knows nothing at all about engines, their structure and their purpose may discover the difference. He may, for example, smell it.”
    The “complete combustion,” in Warburg’s analogy, is respiration. The “incomplete combustion,” turning nutrients into energy without oxygen, is known as fermentation. Fermentation provides a useful backup when oxygen can’t reach cells quickly enough to keep up with demand. (Our muscle cells turn to fermentation during intense exercise.) Warburg thought that defects prevent cancer cells from being able to use respiration, but scientists now widely agree that this is wrong. A growing tumor can be thought of as a construction site, and as today’s researchers explain it, the Warburg effect opens the gates for more and more trucks to deliver building materials (in the form of glucose molecules) to make “daughter” cells.
    If this theory can explain the “why” of the Warburg effect, it still leaves the more pressing question of what, exactly, sets a cell on the path to the Warburg effect and cancer. Scientists at several of the nation’s top cancer hospitals have spearheaded the Warburg revival, in hopes of finding the answer. These researchers, typically molecular biologists by training, have turned to metabolism and the Warburg effect because their own research led each of them to the same conclusion: A number of the cancer-causing genes that have long been known for their role in cell division also regulate cells’ consumption of nutrients.

  25. Craig Thompson, the president and chief executive of the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, has been among the most outspoken proponents of this renewed focus on metabolism. In Thompson’s analogy, the Warburg effect can be thought of as a social failure: a breakdown of the nutrient-sharing agreement that single-celled organisms signed when they joined forces to become multicellular organisms. His research showed that cells need to receive instructions from other cells to eat, just as they require instructions from other cells to divide. Thompson hypothesized that if he could identify the mutations that lead a cell to eat more glucose than it should, it would go a long way toward explaining how the Warburg effect and cancer begin. But Thompson’s search for those mutations didn’t lead to an entirely new discovery. Instead, it led him to AKT, a gene already well known to molecular biologists for its role in promoting cell division. Thompson now believes AKT plays an even more fundamental role in metabolism.

    The protein created by AKT is part of a chain of signaling proteins that is mutated in up to 80 percent of all cancers. Thompson says that once these proteins go into overdrive, a cell no longer worries about signals from other cells to eat; it instead stuffs itself with glucose. Thompson discovered he could induce the “full Warburg effect” simply by placing an activated AKT protein into a normal cell. When that happens, Thompson says, the cells begin to do what every single-celled organism will do in the presence of food: eat as much as it can and make as many copies of itself as possible. When Thompson presents his research to high-school students, he shows them a slide of mold spreading across a piece of bread. The slide’s heading — “Everyone’s first cancer experiment” — recalls Warburg’s observation that cancer cells will carry out fermentation at almost the same rate of wildly growing yeasts.

    Just as Thompson has redefined the role of AKT, Chi Van Dang, director of the Abramson Cancer Center at the University of Pennsylvania, has helped lead the cancer world to an appreciation of how one widely studied gene can profoundly influence a tumor’s metabolism. In 1997, Dang became one of the first scientists to connect molecular biology to the science of cellular metabolism when he demonstrated that MYC — a so-called regulator gene well known for its role in cell proliferation — directly targets an enzyme that can turn on the Warburg effect. Dang recalls that other researchers were skeptical of his interest in a housekeeping enzyme, but he stuck with it because he came to appreciate something critical: Cancer cells can’t stop eating.

    Unlike healthy cells, growing cancer cells are missing the internal feedback loops that are designed to conserve resources when food isn’t available. They’re “addicted to nutrients,” Dang says; when they can’t consume enough, they begin to die. The addiction to nutrients explains why changes to metabolic pathways are so common and tend to arise first as a cell progresses toward cancer: It’s not that other types of alterations can’t arise first, but rather that, when they do, the incipient tumors lack the access to the nutrients they need to grow. Dang uses the analogy of a work crew trying to put up a building. “If you don’t have enough cement, and you try to put a lot of bricks together, you’re going to collapse,” he says.

    Metabolism-centered therapies have produced some tantalizing successes. Agios Pharmaceuticals, a company co-founded by Thompson, is now testing a drug that treats cases of acute myelogenous leukemia that have been resistant to other therapies by inhibiting the mutated versions of the metabolic enzyme IDH 2. In clinical trials of the Agios drug, nearly 40 percent of patients who carry these mutations are experiencing at least partial remissions.
    Researchers working in a lab run by Peter Pedersen, a professor of biochemistry at Johns Hopkins, discovered that a compound known as 3-bromopyruvate can block energy production in cancer cells and, at least in rats and rabbits, wipe out advanced liver cancer. (Trials of the drug have yet to begin.) At Penn, Dang and his colleagues are now trying to block multiple metabolic pathways at the same time. In mice, this two-pronged approach has been able to shrink some tumors without debilitating side effects. Dang says the hope is not necessarily to find a cure but rather to keep cancer at bay in a “smoldering quiet state,” much as patients treat their hypertension.

    Warburg, too, appreciated that a tumor’s dependence upon a steady flow of nutrients might eventually prove to be its fatal weakness. Long after his initial discovery of the Warburg effect, he continued to research the enzymes involved in fermentation and to explore the possibility of blocking the process in cancer cells. The challenge Warburg faced then is the same one that metabolism researchers face today: Cancer is an incredibly persistent foe. Blocking one metabolic pathway has been shown to slow down and even stop tumor growth in some cases, but tumors tend to find another way. “You block glucose, they use glutamine,” Dang says, in reference to another primary fuel used by cancers. “You block glucose and glutamine, they might be able to use fatty acids. We don’t know yet.”
    Given Warburg’s own story of historical neglect, it’s fitting that what may turn out to be one of the most promising cancer metabolism drugs has been sitting in plain sight for decades. That drug, metformin, is already widely prescribed to decrease the glucose in the blood of diabetics (76.9 million metformin prescriptions were filled in the United States in 2014). In the years ahead, it’s likely to be used to treat — or at least to prevent — some cancers. Because metformin can influence a number of metabolic pathways, the precise mechanism by which it achieves its anticancer effects remains a source of debate. But the results of numerous epidemiological studies have been striking. Diabetics taking metformin seem to be significantly less likely to develop cancer than diabetics who don’t — and significantly less likely to die from the disease when they do.

    Near the end of his life, Warburg grew obsessed with his diet. He believed that most cancer was preventable and thought that chemicals added to food and used in agriculture could cause tumors by interfering with respiration. He stopped eating bread unless it was baked in his own home. He would drink milk only if it came from a special herd of cows, and used a centrifuge at his lab to make his cream and butter.
    Warburg’s personal diet is unlikely to become a path to prevention. But the Warburg revival has allowed researchers to develop a hypothesis for how the diets that are linked to our obesity and diabetes epidemics — specifically, sugar-heavy diets that can result in permanently elevated levels of the hormone insulin — may also be driving cells to the Warburg effect and cancer.

    The insulin hypothesis can be traced to the research of Lewis Cantley, the director of the Meyer Cancer Center at Weill Cornell Medical College. In the 1980s, Cantley discovered how insulin, which is released by the pancreas and tells cells to take up glucose, influences what happens inside a cell. Cantley now refers to insulin and a closely related hormone, IGF-1 (insulinlike growth factor 1), as “the champion” activators of metabolic proteins linked to cancer. He’s beginning to see evidence, he says, that in some cases, “it really is insulin itself that’s getting the tumor started.” One way to think about the Warburg effect, says Cantley, is as the insulin, or IGF-1, signaling pathway “gone awry — it’s cells behaving as though insulin were telling it to take up glucose all the time and to grow.” Cantley, who avoids eating sugar as much as he can, is currently studying the effects of diet on mice that have the mutations that are commonly found in colorectal and other cancers. He says that the effects of a sugary diet on colorectal, breast and other cancer models “looks very impressive” and “rather scary.”

    Elevated insulin is also strongly associated with obesity, which is expected soon to overtake smoking as the leading cause of preventable cancer. Cancers linked to obesity and diabetes have more receptors for insulin and IGF-1, and people with defective IGF-1 receptors appear to be nearly immune to cancer. Retrospective studies, which look back at patient histories, suggest that many people who develop colorectal, pancreatic or breast cancer have elevated insulin levels before diagnosis. It’s perhaps not entirely surprising, then, that when researchers want to grow breast-cancer cells in the lab, they add insulin to the tissue culture. When they remove the insulin, the cancer cells die.

    “I think there’s no doubt that insulin is pro-cancer,” Watson says, with respect to the link between obesity, diabetes and cancer. “It’s as good a hypothesis as we have now.” Watson takes metformin for cancer prevention; among its many effects, metformin works to lower insulin levels. Not every cancer researcher, however, is convinced of the role of insulin and IGF-1 in cancer. Robert Weinberg, a researcher at M.I.T.’s Whitehead Institute who pioneered the discovery of cancer-causing genes in the ’80s, has remained somewhat cool to certain aspects of the cancer-metabolism revival. Weinberg says that there isn’t yet enough evidence to know whether the levels of insulin and IGF-1 present in obese people are sufficient to trigger the Warburg effect. “It’s a hypothesis,” Weinberg says. “I don’t know if it’s right or wrong.”

    During Warburg’s lifetime, insulin’s effects on metabolic pathways were even less well understood. But given his ego, it’s highly unlikely that he would have considered the possibility that anything other than damaged respiration could cause cancer. He died sure that he was right about the disease. Warburg framed a quote from Max Planck and hung it above his desk: “A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die.”

      • That’s easier than starving yourself but only works on the surface, after that it gets more complicated, like if you have a melanoma with extensive roots growing everywhere, well anyway, the fungus theory, or “like” fungus, is out there now

          • Excellent finding crisscross!
            I had reason to look this up a couple of weeks ago. This is what I found.
            (Voltaren Emulgel = Diclofenac 11.6 mg per gram) Primarily applicable on actinic keratosis which can develop into various skin cancers.
            https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3132090/

            “Diclofenac is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID). Its proposed mechanism of action in treating actinic keratoses is blocking cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2), thereby reducing angiogenesis and cellular proliferation. Recently, topical diclofenac has been shown to upregulate apoptosis. Induction of apoptosis appears to be highly characteristic of the mode of action of diclofenac in hyaluronic acid, and the therapeutic effect may be related to sensitization of neoplastic keratinocytes for death ligand-induced apoptosis.19 Thus, it is believed that diclofenac starves out the dysplastic keratinocytes while causing programmed cell death, which results in lesion clearance with a minimum of inflammation. Diclofenac 3% + hyaluronic acid 2.5% (Solaraze™) is used twice a day for up to 90 days. Four weeks after 60 days of treatment, 100% of actinic keratoses were cleared in 33% of patients and, after 90 days of treatment, the 100% clearance rate was 50%.20 A recent study has demonstrated that 180 days of therapy with diclofenac shows no significant improvement over 90 days.21 A one-year extension study was performed that showed a further decrease in target (original) actinic keratoses from 90% to 95% after a year, although the cumulative actinic keratosis count had increased slightly as a result of new actinic keratoses developing in areas of field cancerization.22 Figure 1 demonstrates the steady decrease in the number of actinic keratoses over 90 days of treatment, and the further decrease 30 days and one year after completion of the 90-day course. Topical diclofenac + hyaluronic acid has been shown to be a safe and effective for treatment of actinic keratosis on the mucosal lip, with a minimum of irritation. In most cases, this consists of mild crusting, while the actinic keratoses are resolving. Patient satisfaction with this treatment is rated to be high.23 Diclofenac has been shown to be safe and effective in organ transplant recipients. Ulrich et al followed a group of 24 organ transplant patients for two years. In the active treatment group, none developed invasive squamous cell carcinoma.24”

          • I had basal cell carcinoma in my nose. I put a blob of Voltaren on the end of my forefinger and swabbed the inside of my nose for a couple of months. I can now breath properly. I might tell the doctor of the treatment one day.

            P.S. It does cause a short sneezing episode.

          • Thanks Crisscross,
            You sound like you have a good grip on the BCC.

            Diclofenac is said to be safe to use daily on tissues in the mouth for several months, so nasal tissues should be seen similarly. If the condition you describe cannot be easily inspected, maybe it would be wise to continue the therapy for a month or two and checked by en ENT??

            (Another agent said to be active against BCCs is EGCG = EpiGalloCatechinGallate). Prof Saverio Bettuzzi (Uni Parma It.) could prove that EGCG is an important protection against Prostate cancer. Green tea powder is now in the limelight again as a Zinc transporter (Ionophore) in the prophylactic efforts against Virus infections.

            https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16424063/

            https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/2/398/pdf

  26. Researchers Finally Confirm That Cancer Is A Purely Man-Made Disease

    https://artofdetox.com/cancer-purely-man-made-disease

    Researchers from the University Of Manchester, United Kingdom, have concluded that cancer is a purely modern, man-made disease. In the United Kingdom alone, Cancer claims more than 150,000 lives each year…………….

    DOCTORS WHO DISCOVERED CANCER ENZYMES IN VACCINES ALL FOUND MURDERED …

    https://globalpossibilities.org/doctors-who-discovered-cancer-enzymes-in-vaccines-all-found-murdered/

    These scientists all shared a common trait; they had all discovered that Nagalase enzyme protein was being added to vaccines which were then administrated to humans. Nagalese is what prevents vitamin D from being produced in the body, which is the body’s main defense to naturally kill cancer cells. (SCROLL DOWN FOR VIDEO) ……………..

  30. Technically a simple piece for Helene Grimaud (50 yoa at the time), however Silvestro’s arrangement of Schubert’s “Heirats Waltz” is brilliant.
    https://youtu.be/VDsONFwJ0YU

    Ron Farson
    2 years ago
    Outstanding…..this has to be one of the most beautiful things I have ever heard! thank you!

  32. Confusing re. CDC and ACIP voting. Is there a simple explanation, the dates wrong?
    Yesterday I mentioned that CDC had voted (16 votes to 0) to give infants down to 6 month the Quackzine. Today I read that ACIP voted on the same issue 15 votes to 0. Is it possible that CDC votes before ACIP?
    Steve Kirsch: https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/acip-committee-approves-mrna-vaccines
    (Do not miss what Meryl Nass says and how the chairperson Dr Grace Lee of ACIP tried to refuse receiving the (very) damaging Israeli data! Police in Palo Alto were called to her home to give her the document!!)
    Reuters 20OCT2022 : https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-cdc-advisers-approve-adding-covid-shots-vaccine-schedules-2022-10-20/

    Who is ACIP?
    The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) provides advice and guidance to the Director of the CDC regarding use of vaccines and related agents for control of vaccine-preventable diseases in the civilian population of the United States. Recommendations made by the ACIP are reviewed by the CDC Director and, if adopted, are published as official CDC/HHS recommendations in the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR).

  34. Mass Mind Control Through Network Television: Are Your Thoughts Your Own?

    “Experiments conducted by researcher Herbert Krugman reveal that when a person watches television, brain activity switches from the left to the right hemisphere. The left hemisphere is the seat of logical thought. Here, information is broken down into its component parts and critically analyzed. The right brain, however, treats incoming data uncritically, processing information in wholes, leading to emotional, rather than logical responses. The shift from left to right brain activity also causes the release of endorphins, the body’s own natural opiates–thus, it is possible to become physically addicted to watching television, a hypothesis borne out by numerous studies which have shown that very few people are able to kick the television habit.

    “………….. During World War I, Lippman and Bernays were hired by then United States President, Woodrow Wilson, to participate in the Creel Commission, the mission of which was to sway popular opinion in favor of entering the war, on the side of Britain. Edward Bernays said in his 1928 book Propaganda that,

    “The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country.” ………….”

    https://christianobserver.net/mass-mind-control-through-network-television-are-your-thoughts-your-own/

    • Western media’s lying narrative in anti-China news story –

      Chinese Consulate Attacked by Violent Thugs!
      30,088 views Premiered 12 hours ago Manchester’s Chinese consulate was attacked by a violent mob. But you would never know if if you only listen to “some” news agencies…

  35. European Union BLASTS Pfizer For Hiding Data

    45,841 views Oct 21, 2022 Here in the United States we may treat Big Pharma with kid gloves, delivering only slaps on the wrist for even the industry’s most egregious crimes against humanity, but that’s not the case in Europe. Recently some members of the European Parliament have raised serious questions about the COVID vaccines – specifically the information provided about vaccines’ effectiveness and side effects, and it appears these European political figures are serious about challenging the corruption that rots to the very core of the pharmaceutical industry.

    Jimmy and America’s Comedian Kurt Metzger discuss the backbone demonstrated by EU pols and why no domestic elected official will ever challenge Big Pharma.

    Here in the United States we may treat Big Pharma with kid gloves, delivering only slaps on the wrist for even the industry’s most egregious crimes against humanity, but that’s not the case in Europe. Recently some members of the European Parliament have raised serious questions about the COVID vaccines – specifically the information provided about vaccines’ effectiveness and side effects, and it appears these European political figures are serious about challenging the corruption that rots to the very core of the pharmaceutical industry.

    Jimmy and America’s Comedian Kurt Metzger discuss the backbone demonstrated by EU pols and why no domestic elected official will ever challenge Big Pharma.

C'mon Leave a Reply, Debate and Add to the Discussion

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.