Home Health The Vaccine–Autism Controversy

The Vaccine–Autism Controversy

16
Amish kids playing (Photo from aworldtotravel.com, Nerea Capon)

By Tony Ryan

This article does not seek to dissuade the reader from being vaccinated, but to provide frustrated truth-seekers with some information that is never permitted to appear in the public media. The author’s attitude is that if people are gullible enough to believe the propaganda of the sickness industry, they thoroughly deserve the outcomes.

The author claims no qualifications or expertise other than a willingness to undertake the arduous research of those who are in fact qualified and who have also demonstrated intelligence, competence and integrity. This, in the author’s opinion, disqualifies around 95% of ‘health professionals’ and, most certainly, all politicians and ‘health’ bureaucrats.

History

The history of Autism goes back only 84 years.

  • In 1933, autism was unheard-of.
  • In 1934, the first case of autism was encountered. This occurred months after public vaccination regimes commenced.
  • Fifty years ago, with vaccination regimes much-expanded, the occurrence of autism was declared one in 10,000.
  • Now in Australia autism is reported as one in sixty-seven; and in the US, one in fifty? The exponential increase has exactly paralleled the expansion of vaccination regimes.
  • Independent studies showed that unvaccinated populations experience no autism at all.

Two independent studies into the 300,000 population of Amish in the US recorded only two cases of autism and these were in children of one family who had spent time away from the Amish community and were vaccinated by non-Amish relatives.

Autism and other vaccine injuries are clearly a serious global phenomenon, one that is injuring and even killing millions of babies and infants. One would routinely expect all governments to spare no expense or effort to urgently identify the cause or causes, and the remedy. Yet not one government is doing this, except to fund research to prove the pandemic is not caused by vaccinations.

Something is very wrong here.

The entire point of government is to protect The People from exploitation and oppression by the powerful. Yet here we are, with governments and the media protecting the medical / pharmaceutical monopoly from public scrutiny.

Moreover, governments are punishing citizens who question the validity of medical practices, which easily-available evidence demonstrates are harmful to children.

Doctors who support these citizens and who duly recognise that the contra-indication evidence cannot be repudiated; are vilified and ridiculed, and many have lost their licences.

When governments repress evidence or wrongdoing and death, to any normal human being, this can only be described as absolute corruption.

However, in jurisdictions where outcomes are regulated solely by evidence, and I refer here to law courts, the outcome is very different.

Injury Caused by Vaccines

Court actions in UK, Italy, Sweden, India, Nepal, Hungary, France, the US and other nations have proved instances of injury caused by the following vaccines: polio, mumps, measles, MMR (combo measles, mumps, rubella), H1N1 swine flu, seasonal flu, tetanus (the tetanus/diphtheria/pertussis combo vaccine), and varicella (chicken pox), and the new HPP (Gardasil cervical cancer vaccine with 39 US deaths); while the Australian Government and Australian Medical Association posture inexplicably that such risk either does not exist or is so low as to be of negligible concern.

It is routinely claimed by authorities that the cause of autism is essentially unknown, but is probably of genetic origin. Given the exponential explosion of incidence over 84 years from a position of no cases at all, one thing we can presume for an absolute certainty is that genetics plays no causal part in autism and any claim that it is a gross insult to our intelligence. (Nonetheless, doctors have been routinely insulting our intelligence for decades and with remarkable success; aided by prolific film and TV public relations creations.

The doctor/pharmaceutical/government alliance (known to healthy cynics as the Sickness Industry) has also told us there is no known cure for autism.

UK neurologist, Dr Natasha Campbell-McBride, following through on the research of fellow-national Dr Andrew Wakefield, was one of those who made a breakthrough when she cured her own child of autism largely through reintroducing gut flora.

I have viewed a video in which a tearful mother told us that her teenage son had just looked her in the eye for the first time in his life and said “I love you Mum”. This is the impact of Campbell-McBride’s therapies and treatments, cures that desperate parents of autistic children would probably kill for, but are denied to them.

What follows in the next few paragraphs is, for the sake of brevity, my own interpretation of Campbell-McBride’s and others’ experience and research results:

A pattern appears to have emerged that vaccinations interfere with the natural development of children’s immune systems leading to new chronic infections: typically tonsil, adenoid, and ear infections; but also chronic diarrhoea (initiated by lack of protective gut flora, and then again exacerbated by repeatedly prescribed antibiotics and vaccines). These were conditions which emerged following introduction of vaccines, most especially MMR.

The complex sequence of multi-sourced attacks appears to be as follows:

1.  Since the introduction of the contraceptive pill, which is now thought to compromise gut flora, thus-effected women appear to pass on this deficiency to their female babies; who grow up to pass on a more enhanced gut flora deficiency (Gut and Psychological Syndrome… GAPS) in their own children, and so on. This is believed to be intergenerationally cumulative. Such babies, especially if not breastfed are highly susceptible to infections.

Babies harvest gut and skin flora in the birth canal and, therefore, Caesarean babies do not receive this critical benefit. Breastfed babies receive their second launching of their immune system from initial breast milk, and this quality is self-modifying over the breast-feeding period. (Breastfed babies become susceptible when breastfeeding ceases, which is why breast feeding for four years is recommended; but bottle-fed babies suffer from birth).

Because they have yet to develop an immune system, GAPS babies are incapable of benefiting from vaccines (some opinion has it that no baby less than two years old can benefit from vaccines, period… a thought which makes absolute sense). Worse, many vaccines contain genetically modified viruses with unknown effects (incorporated in the vaccine purely to enable patenting by the pharmaceutical corporations).

2.  Routinely, as infections or symptoms occur, doctors prescribe antibiotics and the consequential further or complete elimination of gut flora exposes the child to atypical infections while simultaneously depressing normal immune system development. One strain of atypical bacteria tends to form an exclusive and dominant colony and produces a toxin that damages parts of both the cranial and enteric nervous systems; and sometimes the extent of this damage is exacerbated by other factors (3 & 4).

3.  Brain and nerve damage is also influenced by the kind of adjuvants used in vaccines, particularly, it would seem, glutamate, mercury, aluminium and formaldehyde; which appear to independently cause brain harm of their own, hardly surprising considering mercury is the second most toxic element after uranium; and glutamate is the substance that regulates early brain development, influenced by the overall immune system (see Dr Blaylock link here, and below.)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aUCCdCecLTo&feature=BFa&list=PLA77C01EF916264F7

4.  Common and (in this context) toxic vaccine adjuvants and additives are: aluminium, monosodium glutamate, sodium phosphate, phenoxyethanol, gelatin, sulphites, yeast protein, antibiotics, RNA and DNA from animal and human tissue cultures, squalene, ethyl glycol (anti-freeze), triton disinfectant, phenol, and polysorbate 80. Additional chemicals implicated in autism are preservatives 280 and 283. Many of these are extremely toxic in minute doses and at least two of these seriously retard or stop infant brain development, so why are these substances used in medical treatments for babies and children and pregnant women?

There is one very obvious answer: because they are cheaper adjuvants than the expensive alternatives. Is this partly about profit? These multi-sourced interactive attacks on the brain and nervous system tend to explain the wide spectrum of autism manifestations; possibly exacerbated by aspartame, food MSG and, without doubt, by bottle-feeding of babies (all legal dairy milk contains rBST).

5.  A fourth series of effects can be sourced in the active component of the vaccine itself. The polio vaccine administered in India has so far caused 47,000 cases of paralysis, inexplicably dubbed non-polio paralysis by typically dishonest medical scientists.

6.  A fifth cumulative or even primary concern is contaminants in vaccines. Jonas Salk himself admitted in a video interview that there were 37 contaminants in his polio vaccine, ranging from animal protein to pathogen particles. (Having explained this he cackled insanely, and then died).

Autism is not the only issue of contention.

Claimed vaccine efficacy itself has been a fraud. Objective research of two centuries of disease incidence reveals that all of the diseases claimed to be reduced or eliminated by vaccines, had declined dramatically long before vaccine programmes were established (ie small pox et al); largely due to improved public nutrition, personal hygiene, and treatment of injuries. The claims by the pharmaceutical corporations and medical industry are bogus. (See here and here.)

The high percentage of already vaccinated disease victims demonstrates the vaccines simply do not work (ie pertussis and tetanus).

Some vaccines actually cause disease. Chicken pox vaccine, for example, causes previously unknown childhood shingles, more dangerous and infinitely more painful than the original childhood disease.

Objective analysis of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) also seems to reveal vaccination to be the cause.

Conclusions

The most immediate logical conclusion is that all suspect vaccines should be immediately taken off the market.

Vaccines that do not work, or that cause disease, or pose high risk of autism or Guillain-Barre Syndrome (H1N1 swine flu vaccine) must be condemned and discontinued.

Currently, almost all safety checking is done by the pharmaceutical corporations themselves and all of it is very short term (ie a few weeks rather than years).

Australia and NZ’s reliance on America’s FDA is naïve in the extreme, or as many would say, cynical, considering how many FDA executives have career origins in the pharmaceutical corporations they are purported to regulate.

This is my only recommendation, one that government has ignored for seven years now:

Each government should immediately establish an independent and transparent research facility to examine the short and long term effects of all pharmaceutical and commercial products that are ingested by humans.

 

Disclaimer: I am merely a health product consumer and I make no claim to be an expert. But as a component of various university courses (education, social welfare) I was required to study Public Health, which memorably held that historical disease incidence reduction occurred following a series of initiatives: 1880s introduction of sewerage systems; establishment of clean drinking water reservoirs; garbage collection; improved housing; enhanced nutrition; public education, facilitating health education; the discovery of antibiotics; and a succession of preventive environmental health programmes.

With this dichotomy of public health successes were accompanying graphs which time-sequenced these events and their impact on disease incidence. Time-honoured public health knowledge suddenly evaporated and we were told that vaccinations were responsible.

© Tony Ryan

[Editor’s Note: There will be further articles from Tony on this issue.]

SHARE

16 COMMENTS

  1. Thanks Tony, I found this an interesting read: at

    https://www.omicsonline.org/open-access/the-science-behind-the-absence-of-autism-in-the-amish-community-energeticimmunity-2165-7890-1000e131.php?aid=59058

    I quote:
    “[the Amish] Making a choice not to vaccinate their children is a well-known albeit controversial practice in the Amish population by and large. What has been largely overlooked and misunderstood as to how their immunity is robust without following the vaccination schedule as advised by conventional medicine is the psychoneuroimmunological basis that underlies their choices and hence the positive results they are experiencing as a result of those choices in the form of almost all their children being free from the symptoms of autism.

    …The Amish community is world renowned for their way of life that is based on leading life in a manner that honors the intelligence of the cells of the body, trusting the signals that their bodies send that reveal what resonates with well-being and acting on those signals and impulses.

    … vaccination, if they make the choice to do so, causes more harm than good.

    … more obvious biomedical basis for the absence of autism in the Amish community is the fact that throughout many centuries they have rigorously followed organic farming and have been consuming only organic produce grown mostly on their own farms, by themselves. Their food is therefore pesticide free and is consistently sustained as such over many generations.”

    • The Amish live and eat healthily, but this would not stop them from developing autism or other damage incurred from absorbing mercury or aluminium in adjuvents. The article is actually an attempt to dilute the evidence pertaining to zero vaccination correlations.

      In point of fact, non-Amish Australians have the same good health as Amish, even though their diet is not as good.

  2. The duty of governments is to save us, the prime responsibility of individuals who are selected for representing the people is to, in the name of the public good is to commit and obey a unwritten code in the full light of of public announcements proclaim the destruction of the integrity of those who vote the representatives in and the need for overseas ownership of the nations sovereignty to own the assets and all wealth a nation has and to impress the sale of the nations wealth is for the publics health and good, to be gratefull to pay for military assets to protect our nation from greater harm for those who are overseas owners or absentee landlords and for us all to make a greater effort in our delusion to remain within a prison and having a bracelet giving us the message of freedom, those who are considered a risk to any ideology of`other than being free will be reported or if those who think other than being correct? society will have to make rules to ensure punishment will be a solution to curtail behavior being modified to what is thought normal.

  3. Another very good article. I am 73 years of age, so have lived through the era of the origination of the affliction known as autism. I have a nephew who is diagnosed with autism, I think only mildly, but he is unable to retain work, because of his non ability to concentrate. When I was a young fellow, not only was anyone not diagnosed with autism, nobody seemed to be acting as though they had autism.

    There were certainly naughty children, usually of parents who allowed their children to rule them, instead of the other way round. But these spoilt kids did not outwardly show the symptoms of autism.

    As is mentioned in the article, the gut health has a lot to do with human behaviour. If the gut is not digesting nutrient from food, then the rest of the body cannot produce the goodness for performing correctly. The brain is starved of minerals and vitamins, so actions and thoughts are inappropriate. The bones of our skeletal frame cannot absorb the same vital elements, so we develop osteoarthritis and worse still osteoporosis.

    The combination of the program of excessive vaccinations at the same time that our feeding habits have been under attack is a situation that our bodies cannot correct, our neutralise.

    The article also mentions that the prevalence of most diseases and disorders of the body have diminished in the towns and countries where sewage, rubbish collection, better hygiene and eating habits are in use, than in the past history. This has to be common sense as to why disease is less of a threat.

    If as much finance was put into investigating the connection between vaccinations and disease, as there is to pay for advertising the “necessity” of vaccinations, I am sure governments would be forced to curtail the use of vaccinations. After all I am sure it would produce evidence that the aggressive vaccination programs are (1) to provide rich pickings for the pharmaceutical industry and (2) a tool whereby “One World Government” gets to reduce the World’s population and the “dumbed down effect” of the population that it so desperately requires.

    In fact I challenge our Federal Government to provided funds to independent laboratories to test whether vaccinations are as big a danger to human health as this and other articles imply.

  4. The Australian media, politicians, journalists, and medical establishment refuse to permit a study into the thousands of Australian children who have never been vaccinated.

    independent studies have shown that unvaccinated children are way more healthy than vaccinated children, and more intelligent. Attempts to put this information before the public have been obstructed.

    Doctors who have provided qualified evidence that holds vaccines suspect have been deregistered and vilified.

    The fact that, for seven years, government, controlled by the medical industry, has refused to permit objective research to determine once and for all the truth about vaccines and other toxicities, is ipso facto evidence that they have something to hide.

    • They certainly do have something to hide: deliberate genocide.

      Tony, in my book Consider the Lilies (free download) I trace the phoniness back to the very first vaccination by Dr Edward Jenner. Even at that stage it had nothing to do with saving lives.

      Anger, please. Anger.

      Oh and by the way many good doctors opposed vax in the 1800s, and there was no means to take away their license for that, but UK Parliament kept passing laws as though no doctor had found anything wrong.

      Thanks Tony. Time to say Get the murderers who are doing this. (They thinks it’s great sport.)

      Mal points out that it makes money, but I say the money is only a by-product.

      Parents should not cave in no matter how much pressure is put.

  5. Think about these points. If, as many people believe, vaccinations have nothing to do with saving us from certain diseases, and the Australian Government was not allowed to finance these “free” vaccinations, that money would be freed up for other helpful purposes. Not only that, what about the money subsidising most other health problems that are brought on by the immune system being attacked by these vaccines.

    Many types of cancer are promoted by the weakening of the immune system.

    If the huge amount of money spent needlessly(?) on health issues was able to be used in other areas, our National debt could have been paid off in a very short time.

    Many people who are on sickness benefits, unable to work, and collecting invalid pensions, would maybe still be in the workforce. Saving the Government probably millions of dollars a year in payments, and instead be collecting taxation from these people.

    There are many side issues of this debate.

  7. Medical/Nursing/Allied health staff still not being compelled to receive vaccines so far in the public health system. They still rely on shaming at the collegiate level to push the agenda.

    • Paul… In NSW, doctors and nurses are required to be fully vaccinated to work in public hospitals. I think it’s the same in private hospitals. And although all NSW doctors promote flu vaccines, 50% of NSW doctors refuse to take them themselves.

  8. Much of what government do regarding the health and safety of the individual is claimed to be out of care and concern for the physical safety and security of the individual.
    When I put this claim up against a comparative measure such as their concern for our financial security, I find there is a vast chasm between the professed concern of government for our health and their actual concern for our financial security. However; for wealthy individuals and corporations things are very different.
    This vast chasm, IMO, proves the lie in their claims that they are concerned for my physical safety.

  10. I suspect that the truth about the genesis of coronavirus may graqdually seep into the mainstream Australian community, creating a credibility problem for pseudo-scientists and the sickness industry.

C'mon Leave a Reply, Debate and Add to the Discussion

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.