Home News Tsarnaev Trial – A Pictorial Review

Tsarnaev Trial – A Pictorial Review

10

by Mary W Maxwell LLB

I have argued that an entirely false story has been mounted against Dzhokhar – Jahar – Tsarnaev. He is not the Marathon bomber. My way of showing Jahar’s innocence is NOT via pictures. It is via the mishandling by a court. I dislike the way Youtubers, such as Peekay, have used photos and videos – who can know their source, and the chain-of-custody?

I asked my friend Ian to fiddle with the picture above. He inserted Trump to the right of Jahar’s hat, and inserted Josef Stalin (who died in 1953) at the top right. Ian hadn’t tried photo-shopping before – that’s how easy it is to do. This picture is at 755 Boylston St.  It was shown to the court (without Ian’s additions!).  But did it contain Jahar as an “addition”? I don’t know. It was tendered as evidence that Jahar was at the place where a bomb was found.

Jahar was supposedly near the Richard family. Look at the three persons on left, leaning on the railing – Jane, who suffered an amputation, Martin who died, and his Mom. Some have noted that Jane has very straight hair yet in photo minutes later it’s curly.

I have no intention of using pictures to find the bomber. On another occasion we can discuss the deceptive use of a reenactment by National Geographic. Still, let’s walk through some the official pix now.

Here is a clear shot of the brothers, allegedly at the 2013 Marathon. Most likely it was taken BEFORE 2013.  Note Tamerlan’s lack of a beard. His family insists that he grew a beard for religious reasons in 2012 and never shaved it off. I think Jahar, too, is looking a bit young there. The facial features seem OK. I guess it tp be a real shot of the Tsarnaev’s but INSERTED like Trump and Stalin.

Now for a picture of Tamerlan supposedly taken at the Marathon, which was shown in Court.  I can’t see the face well enough to judge, but the body does not seem heavy enough for Tamerlan.

Any normal defense attorney would have that photo tossed right out as the context is not discernable. Supposedly it was taken on Dartmouth St. Oh, really?

The following shot was frequently run as a video on TV as proof that the brothers were at the Marathon. No one was asked to explain why the boys were walking single file. Or how there would be so much empty space in which to parade at such a crowded event.  (I tried to attend the 2019 Boston Marathon starting at 2pm. It was so crowded you could not get near it.)

Jahar and sister Ailina have a resemblance. Both siblings have a similar chin, but it doesn’t stick out as much as the chin of the “Coram Boy” or “Dorito boy” – as we shall now see.

 Court Exhibit 22K

This is the one I call “Coram boy,” as it led me to write a petition for Coram Nobis to the court. I said the normally portrait layout of the frame was altered into a square in order to crop out the problematic backpack he had on.  Later I judged that it is not Jahar anyway; I believe it is an actor.   And I offer the possibility that he is touching his chin to disguise the fact the chin is too prominent to be Jahar’s.

Now look at “Dorito boy.” This photo is supposed to prove that Jahar went into the Shell station to buy snacks. He too is a chin grabber. Also he may be left-handed, as when we see him take an item from the shelf with his left hand.  On the right is, allegedly, Dun Meng making his escape from the SUV while it was parked at Shell. I am guessing, but only guessing, that both are actors.

However, I think the photo below is genuinely of the brothers, and so probably taken on a different day. (Tamerlan is in the black circle, standing outside the shop.).

En route to Shell, Jahar allegedly stole from an ATM. I feel sure it is not Jahar.  It’s from a surveillance  video that includes footage of this boy walking into the bank’s little foyer. I don’t think Dorito boy is the same person as Coram boy, or ATM boy! Talk about body doubles, did Jahar have body triples?

Next,  I offer these family pictures so you can compare Jahar’s facial features with “ATM boy.”

A typical batch of groomsmen. Red-vested Jahar seems to be best man

  Graduating, Rindge and Latin

In a dishonest world you can’t believe anything.  There’s a surveillance video of brothers coming down stairs at their gym, which the voice-over says was near the day of Marathon. I doubt it. In it Jahar looks only age 17 or so.

And then there’s the naked man video that Gabe Ramirez of CNN narrated in a live broadcast in the wee hours of April 19. It is Tamerlan, according to his family, yet the court ignores it.

What the Court Provided

Jurors were shown images intended to support 10 claims:

  1. that both boys walked on Boylston St at the 2013 Marathon
  2. that Jahar stood near 8-year-old Martin Richard
  3. that Jahar put a backpack on the ground with a bomb in it
  4. that Jahar talked on his cell phone at the crucial time
  5. that the boys walked away, not panicking like the others
  6. that the boys killed MIT cop Sean Collier, to get his gun
  7. that Jahar used Dun Meng’s ATM card to steal $800
  8. that they parked Meng’s SUV near the Shell station pumps
  9. that Jahar bought snacks at the Shell convenience store
  10. that the brothers shot at cops on Laurel St.

To repeat, I think all evidence provided by the prosecution to convict Jahar is garbage, notably: the cuckoo story of the brothers bothering to carjack when they already had a car, or the one about choosing to purloin a gun from an MIT cop, or the one about Jahar running over Tamerlan. I don’t suggest that the above pix have any bearing on the unworthiness of the case. The case was already a paragon of unworthiness.

Note: If any if the fake Jahars or fake Anybody’s would like to confess, I am all ears. No doubt they did not know that their five-minute acting job could land a fellow millennial on Death Row. It would also be nice to hear from any (or all) of the groomsmen. They probably knew Jahar well enough to know that he not only didn’t have the motive to bomb the Marathon, he also did not have the brains. They can gmail me at MaxwellMaryLLB.

SHARE

10 COMMENTS

    • Dear Fish, I don’t know what you mean by “H8” but yes I do want to be argued against. Dee was reluctant to accept this article from me. She is a film expert and can see that I haven’t proven anything.

      But I am not trying to prove. I am questioning.

      Oh never mind the H8. I get the joke. Still, let’s see if anyone else gets it. Ha ha.

  2. Wow, Fish. Thanks for the link to the work of Daniel Hopsicker. I lost touch with my old faves like his website Mad Cow. He is a serious researcher. I had never seen this page which was written within weeks of the 2013 bombing. It says:

    “Ken McCarthy May 19, 2013 at 9:40 pm
    Here’s some grist for your prodigious mill: Officer Sean Collier. Notice that no charges have been filed in his murder. What? They have security cam footage of everything that ever happened in this case, but no footage of a guy sitting in a car in a parking lot, in front a of a bank (credit union really), and one of the main entry points to a university. (There should have been cameras all over and the footage has been referred to, but never shown.)

    Also, shouldn’t there have been shells left at the shooting? It should not be hard to at least make a preliminary connection to the brothers “arsenal” (oops, one gun and a target pistol) and the shooting. Did you know that Collier was a big boxing fan? He would have HAD to recognize the twice Golden Gloves heavyweight champion (’09 and ’10) of New England. And when Collier died, he was active at a boxing gym that Tamerlan had been affiliated with.”

    • and 4 years after the death of Collier we found out that Collier revealed that the Sumerset Police asked money from candidates who wanted to become a Sumerset police. So who had an incentive to kill him other than the Tsarnaev?

  3. Just picked this up from Hopsicker. Printing it in case it’s of use to anyone:

    Jeffrey Epstein, the CIA, Dyncorps, & N-number N474AW
    By Daniel Hopsicker – July 12, 2019
    I received a query from a concerned citizen yesterday, about a subject many find as fascinating as 19 tons of cocaine. Who knows? The two subjects may well be shown to intersect.

    “I know you know about tail #’s and the confusing FAA. What do you make of suspected #Epstein plane sharing the same tail # (N474AW) as plane registered to St. Dept & DynCorp?”

    She enclosed a headline, which read: “Aircraft N-number N474AW shared by Jeffrey Epstein, DynCorp, the State Department and the CIA.”

    After a brief investigation, I replied: The government knows far more about the owner of a 20-year old VW van than they do about ownership of $40 million Gulfstream luxury jets, an increasing number of which are owned by dummy LLC’s located offshore. …. I believe the FAA has been thoroughly compromised by the CIA.

  4. Indeed the FBI bad art of photo shopping is in evidence in Government exhibit 22. First you see someone resembling Jahar carrying a white (or light grey) backpack, then you see Jahar without legs in a still picture that was inserted into the video, then you clearly see Jahar placing his backpack down to the right of the tree. What you will not see in the video itself, is a little back and white bag at the base of the tree that the government say exploded, however you will see a still image that was maliciously inserted into the video by the FBI. That insertion merits that you look at it and think about it seriously as it provides evidence of prosecutorial misconduct.

    The government mislead the jurors by showing them the backpack that allegedly exploded, by inserting, into video exhibit 22, a still image taken from across the street. This lead the jurors to believe that Jahar had actually placed his backpack to the left of the tree.

    Michelle Gamble employed the the FBI is a photograph who has admitted during cross-examination that she has photoshopped exhibit by removing 4-5 people, at the request of prosecutor Weinreb, to show that Jahar planted a bomb directly behind children. Well just that proves that Jahar did not place a bomb at the spot where one exploded as those children are to the right of the tree not the left.

    There is so much that I would like to talk about but what is the point when the ones that should be interested to find the truth are not interested (Boston Police, Boston residents, lawyers, etc.)

  6. Wait a minute. Let’s be logical. Just because it is impossible for Josef Stalin to have attended the 2013 Marathon does not mean Donald Trump also was inserted by photoshop. Trump may have been there.

    The White House was not even a twinkle in his eye yet. In fact he could have done the bombing. Jahar could have done it. I could have done it. (I can prove I was in Australia but maybe the FBI made a false passport in my name, as we know they love to do.)

    Also re Coram boy, maybe Jahar had a nose job. Michael Jackson had a nose job.

    The real qq is: If Trump did it, was it under Russian influence?

C'mon Leave a Reply, Debate and Add to the Discussion

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.