By Dee McLachlan
A Gumshoe reader, Jaz, has sent us what seems to be unreported background audio, from a video that has been viewed over 146,000 times. He was supposed to have a meeting in Manhattan on 9/11, but his work called to changed the venue. He describes the moment the first tower fell, and that he knew the world would never be the same.
The video (below) is noted as the Westside Highway CBS Camera Angle and seems to run continuously for seven and a half minutes before Building 7 comes down.
The Long Pre-Roll is a Give Away
I have been operating cameras and working with cameramen for several decades, and know that it takes only a second to push that ‘on’ button. When I was filming wildlife in the 80s, you waited for hours – the camera at the ready, but not rolling. And then, as soon as you sense some action, you switched on the camera.
The only time you would have a long locked-off pre-roll is if you have been alerted to, and/or are EXPECTING something to happen imminently and quickly – but are not sure of the exact second it is going to happen.
So why was this CBS crew rolling the camera on a building that appears VERY much intact and stable? Earlier, someone put the word out that the skyscraper was going to “come down” – so a CBS manager must have been informed of the approximate time, and then relayed this to the crew to start rolling — and keep rolling until it does.
If it was going to collapse as a result of fire, you would have imagined the cameraman to switch the camera off and on, plus search for flames. For example, one cameraman did exactly that — and was zooming out to grab the collapse (see here at 0.07 in).
But in this CBS case, it is obviously set up — intentionally staged — to “get the shot” of the WTC 7 coming down in a particular window of time. And the building does come down – in what looks like a perfect demolition job, in part free-fall.
NIST never explained how a building with office fires can collapse with such PREDICTABILITY.
There is only one conclusion. Building 7 was wired with explosives, and that its demolition was arranged at a convenient time that afternoon. This implies that the whole attack was a staged event. How could it not be?
It is time now for Minister Josh Frydenberg and all the politicians in Canberra to stop being “stupid and wrong.”
The Audio
On the audio you can hear people chatting and even laughing, then seven and half minutes into the recording the building comes down. There’s a “Whoa whoa”, but 15 seconds later calm voices continue talking. At the end of the video, it cuts to a reporter striding up to camera, and asking, “Did you guys get that?” “We got it.”, is followed by someone saying “I called that an hour ago.”
Jaz transcribed the audio (and visual) details below:
6:28 Casual laughing and chatting in the background. (It is hard to believe this audio is recorded on 9/11. Neither I nor anyone I was around was laughing and casually chatting that day, and we were not in the immediate area.)
6:37 Comment about “radio” heard with response of
6:42 “That transmitter is off, right?”
6:50 “Brian and [Vane?] coming in right now?”
6:53 “What are you doing up there?”
6:54 “Uh, he’s a fucking cowboy. I don’t know.”
7:18 Faint EXPLOSION
7:25 The left side of the WTC 7 starts coming down and at same time a few windows on the left side of the building about 7 stories from the top can be seen as breaking (There seems to be more time between this movement and the building falling than other camera angles of the WTC building 7 falling – worth investigating)
7:26 Four windows are broken 7 stories down, 1 six stories down, and one 4 stories down.
7:27 Additional windows breaking 3 stories down from the top, and 10 stories down.
7:29 Now broken windows on nearly every floor on the left side of the building.
7:31 Remaining elevator shaft structures above building begin to fall into building
7:32 The entire building begins its seemingly impossible uniform FREE-FALL.
7:33 Nearly all floors on right side and around right corner have some broken windows, and some in the middle. Building still appears completely in tact, besides elevator shaft (strongest part of building) that has already fallen into the center of the building.
7:34 Local person says “Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa!”.
15 seconds after the building falls, you can hear some interesting comments. To continue:
7:49 Local person talking on radio says “7 just went down” in a very calm voice as if confirming something happened that they were waiting to occur.
7:52 Remote person on radio says “What’d you say?” or perhaps “What’d you see?”
7:55 Local person talking on radio says, again in a calm way, “Yeah, we got it.” (As if he was completing the task he was specifically assigned to do and was waiting for.)
8:11 Local person talking says “I think I got it.”
8:14 “Yeah, I think I probably got it.”
8:20 Something like, “Man, I think we have some tape to feed.”
8:25 Sounds like someone else may say “What?” in a high pitched response to the comment about having some tape to feed.
8:31 Local person says “[We] Got it.” to someone walking up. Person walking up asks
8:33 “Tell me what you shot before.” (then can’t quite make out for than a couple of words.)
8:39 “Are you rolling back there or you going (over here?).”
8:41 “Uh, I got it right here.”
8:42 “Alright. Uh, we should, uh, interview that cop. Um.”
9:00 Video shot changes, likely with new videotape (same voices talking)
9:09 Sounds like a video tape rewinding.
9:20 News talent with white shirt, tie, and microphone walks up and asks “Did you guys get that?”
9:21 “We got it!”, followed by someone saying…
9:23 “I called that an hour ago!”
The video:
Screen-grab comments from Ned that he couldn’t post (see comment below):
” … maybe the smartest thing to do is to pull it .”
Good ‘ol Larry
Larry and Lowy. The Ziomatic duo.
Ziomatic!
Sounds like a kosher laundrey washing machine.
Worth a copyright claim.
😯
And so they pulled out all of the firemen from WTC7 and they set up a safety perimeter.
At the time that chief commander Nigro from the fire department informed Silverstein about WTC7 some 100’s of firemen had already lost their lives in the twin towers.
WTC7 had been evacuated hours before it collapsed. Basically, an empty office building was left with all of the contents that you might expect from that building. How on earth could anyone predict that fires would occur in that particular building on so many different floors ?
I think that there’s a mayor misunderstanding about the job of a fireman. A fireman’s job is to save the life of people ! The loss of a building is a question of Insurance and will not be the concern of a fireman. As a fireman, you don’t put that much of importance to a building. Once, everyone is safe and sound evacuated from the building, they will try to contain the fire in order to avoid further damage to surrounding buildings. I guess it should be clear for everyone that on 9/11 (after the collapse of the twin towers and collateral damage to 10 other buildings), setting up a safety parameter was the smartest thing to do and so they did (out of a fireman’s point of view -> Larry Silverstein had no authority whatsoever on the decision making of the fire department).
But I guess you’ll disagree.
After all, there MIGHT have been some documents stored (without any backup of those files?) in that building which deserved the loss of some more lives.
You know : how does it feel if I tell you that all you’re saying is that some document is more important to you than the life of a firefighter.
Does it feel good ?
A NOTE ON COMMENTS:
This is extremely concerning. It seems certain people are being “prevented” from commenting on this site at the moment. For about a week, since Ned initially tried to post a comment — and was error rejected — I have tried everything to get him to not be blocked. I have tried countless settings, but it seems he just can’t get on. What is strange too, is that when working on my site — it sometimes suddenly SLOWS to exceptionally unresponsive levels.
Anyway, Ned tried to comment for ninth time tonight — to only get each one cancelled — so he forwarded me the messages — so they can be published. I would app[appreciate anyone else emailing me at mclachlandee@gmail.com if they are having problems. (Thank you for your patience Ned)
https://gumshoenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/ned-comments-1.jpg
I will add the screen-grabs as an attachment to the article
Dear Dee, If you find that so concerning/disturbing, maybe you should consider a source for your website other than WordPress ?
If I’m not mistaken, tt’s not the first time that you experience problems with your website.
WordPress is a good way to manage your website if you don’t want to spend a lot of money and still manage your website yourself (without html knowledge) but it has some downsides as well.
This is a remote Test for Ned
To Jaz: Ta.
The smoking gun that is WTC 7. When will the penny drop for the masses? Hopefully soon.
I’ve posted Dr.Alan Sabrovshy’s “(/11 was an Israeli Mossad operation” video before, but let’s listen to the director of the U.S. Army War College say it once more in his own words, for the dummies.
BTW: Dr.Alan Sabrovsky is himself Jewish. This is not a “Jewish” thing. It’s a Zionist thing.
Big difference!!
I sure hope the decent Jewish people don’t have to take the fall for the criminal Zionist cabal.
it is their choice.
A Jewish mate commented to me in all seriosness. ‘We prefer the official account’.
I know him well, we have discussed 911 and I supect strongly that he knows the official government 911 conspiracy theory is BS…….. he is not dumb, just that some truths are inconvenient to some people.
The event of 9/11 and the subsequent years of unreality, after discovering the obvious contradictions in the official reports of this tragedy, has left the moral compass of the red pilled in a state of suspended disbelief. The corporate media, the universities, governments and major businesses must be all going along to get a long in full knowledge that there is something wrong with the truth relating to this event. Natural Law be damned.
Where exactly are we as a society and what is the future looking like?
You’ve got to be kidding me. Do you still believe that building 7 fell in free fall ?
Geez, you even took the time to document the timing of the collapse using the reporters transcript and you still didn’t notice that the collapse took longer than 6,5 seconds (which would be free fall for a 47 story building).
Face the facts for once…. PLEASE…. I insist.
7:25 The left side of the WTC 7 starts coming down
7:34 Local person says “Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa!”.
That’s already 10 seconds (not 6,5 seconds) ! And the building is still collapsing at the moment the reporter shouts “whoa, whoa, whoa,,…).
In short : total collapse took about 18 seconds (3 times longer than some people wish to believe but hey, video doesn’t lie you know).
Besides, the controlled demolition theory is based on nothing. One would expect from truth organisations who claim to fight for truth, would have come up with some evidence by now (16 years later already).
If you didn’t hear from me for a long time, than it’s for that reason. The searchers for truth haven’t come up with anything new over the past few years..
Did you already find an answer on how the explosives (or nano-thermite for that matter) could have survived the 7-hour lasting fires in WTC 7.
I’d expect that you could answer that one by now ?
You’re back XXXXXingFu with more BS.
Maybe check with that mathematician about free fall.
Back here to distract… with advice and more.
I spoke to the official fire expert who consulted on the collapse.
He admitted that it looked like a perfect demo job — but they wiped if off the board — becsause they didn’t want to investigate that option.
By the way — why don’t YOU write you version — and explain to us WHAT HAPPENED to the building… and we’ll publish it. (But if my memory serves me correctly, we’ve been down that path before.)
By the way, how is dr. Hulsey’s experiment/model on the collapse of WTC 7 going ? For all I know, Richard Gage’s A&E for 9/11 Truth has been asking money from its supporters to fund Hulsey’s project for years now. I guess we are talking about tens of thousands of American Dollars that were donated…
Where can we see the results of this investigation ?
One would expect that an organisation like A&E has collected enough funds over the years to come up with something like this :
I guess that Richard Gage has other priorities and spends the money he receives on other things (whatever that may be).
It’s a shame.
(You might say that the video above still doesn’t look like what has been caught on camera on 9/11, maybe that’s because the author didn’t have a specific goal in mind when entering the data or perhaps although computer models have become more reliable over the years, it’s still lacking some variables which can influence the final result ).
Anyhow, I think the author came up with a rather realistic model of the collapse entering the pure and raw date which is available. We must accept that there will always be variables that we will never know. I tend to say that any computer model which fully represents a collapse as seen on 9/11 has been tampered with.
When will you realize that you have been scammed by Gage (and others) ? I spoke with Richard Gage personally about 2 years ago for about 2 hours after his presentation on 9/11 in Brussels (Belgium). He’s way in too deep to retreat and to confess he was wrong (because of all the money he has asked his audience to fund his projects… and he has had MANY projects to sponsor for).
I don’t know about you Dee ? Are you in too deep to admit you might be wrong about 9/11 ? In my opinion, there’s nothing wrong in searching for the truth. It has been refreshing for some time, but I think you should have come accrossed enough evidence by now which refutes the controlled demolition theory about 9/11. As you might remember from me, I’ve been a truther myself once and it took me literally a couple of years of in-depth researching to be convinced of the fact that fires DO bring down steel framed buildings. It IS possible if you learn more about materials and their behaviour when exposed to heat. Steel will expand (no one can deny that) and it will shrink again when getting colder again. Of course, we’re then talking about temperatures under extreme conditions like fires (that couldn’t be put out because there was no water available)
Anyhow, I hope the information above will be useful for you and your readers.
Kindest regards from Belgium,
XingFu.
The front of the building paints quite a different picture then presented here.
And there’s plenty of testimony from fire fighters and others on the buildings structural state being ready to collapse
Testimony that says it is burning, yes. Collapse — well “they” predicted a steel frame brilliantly constructed building was going to collapse in a few hours. Never happened before EVER. This has also NEVER been predicted before. How did they manage to guess that this single partly burning skyscraper was going to have a catastrophic collapse? And then just before — all the guys on the radio call out “Move back… move, its gonna come down… move back its gonna come down.” then a minute later WHABOOOOM freefall.
Its called a demo job. Don’t be conned, Conner
Hundreds of buildings have burned to frames — over 24 hours, but the never collapsed in a few seconds.