Home UFO/ Space Was the 1969 Moon Landing a Hoax?

Was the 1969 Moon Landing a Hoax?

99

newpaper imageJuly 21, 1969, the day after “The Eagle Has Landed”

by Mary W Maxwell, LLB

Although I am a conspiracy theorist, I don’ t believe every conspiracy story that goes floating by.  Granted, there are some false-flag events that are so obvious you could hardly fail to identify them as false. But there are other stories out there that may, or may not, be true.

The first time I bumped into a false flag was in 1990 when my spouse and I were living in the Persian Gulf.  It was claimed that Saddam Hussein was about to invade Kuwait, and therefore the US needed to bomb the living daylights out of Saddam.  The usual — as we now see it.

I can’t explain how I knew the event was not cricket. But we did at least know, by that point, that the US had provided arms to both sides during the Iran-Iraq War, which lasted from 1980 to 1988, basically the Reagan years. Providing arms to both sides in a war is disgusting. My friend, who was an Anglican vicar in the region, said he saw umpteen amputees in Iraq.

In 1989, George HW Bush became president. By August 1990 we had Operation Desert Shield, and by January 1991 we had Desert Storm. My reaction in early January was to hop up to Boston and make a press release — ask me about that later. (Nobody believed anything other than what our government and media said.)

Anyway, when 2001 rolled around a decade later, you would think I’d be perky enough to see the WTC tragedy, too, as a false flag. (“False flag” refers to incidents that give rise to war and are later seen to have been “arranged.”)

However, shortly before September 2001, one of my respected teachers, himself an Arab, had told me that Osama bin Laden was a real worry. So when the telly said Osama did 9-11, it all made sense. Yes, “blowback”, you know. “Arab hate us for our involvement in the region.”

It wasn’t until February 2005 that I got the corrected story (Inside job.)  I thought I was one of the few who knew, so I was pretty scared. At the time I was in Canada, so I wrote a letter immediately and delivered it to the local police and to a judge — very typical of me. I also tried to bring a copy to the bishop, but the taxi driver couldn’t find his residence.

Sorry, this is long-winded — I only want to say that every claim of a false flag operation does not win my patronage. I have to get into it with full attention and canvass all the resources.  As it happens, I got drawn into four such cases to such an extent that I wrote books about them.

(Two occurred in Australia — the Port Arthur massacre of 1996 and the Sydney siege of 2014. And two in the USA, the Boston Marathon bombing and the Sandy Hook school shooting; all four are false flags. Most of my investigation was done via court documents. And don’tcha be fooled by the current media circus regarding Alex Jones.)

To the Moon, Then

I have never had the opportunity to look into the claim that the US moon-landing of 1969 was a hoax. Offhand, it seemed to me that the very story of it being a hoax was a hoax. So I did not pursue it.

Some of my friends think I am being stubborn by believing the official story.  That’s not quite correct. I just had nothing strong enough (without doing good research) to push me into disbelieving.  There were videos on the Internet that showed what looked to be the astronauts practicing getting out of the spaceship, on earth.  I thought “OK, that was a good precaution in case the camera on the big day did not work.”  Nothing hoax-y about that.

I have also been chided for not taking seriously the announcement that astronauts cannot pass through the Van Allen Belt without getting radiated to death. The reason I was not moved by that, is that I used to live around the corner, in Adelaide Australia, from Sir Mark Oliphant.  He told me plenty of stories before he died in 2000. I assumed that if he hadn’t quizzed the Van Allen Belt problem, there was nothing to quiz. (Oliphant, in the 1920s, was a protege in of Ernst Rutherford, at Cambridge, who split the atom.)

Long story short, a friend sent me the video, today, of the son of Cyrus Akers. It is a death bed confession of the son, dated 2022, telling what his dad told him in 2002. The dad was privy to a government secret. Needless to say, I cannot teach anyone that the moon landing was a hoax, based on a video narrated by someone who us not able to be quizzed. (He died in February ’22.)

Nevertheless, for my own satisfaction, the video did the trick. I think the son’s story and the dad’s story pass the sniff test. You can watch it below. Here is what he says (from 4 minutes on the tape to 11 minutes):

In 1968 Lyndon Johnson went to Canon Air Force Base, New Mexico, where Dad Akers was stationed. Akers and 14 others were sworn to secrecy. Trucks arrived with all the props needed for a lunar-landing scene. As best as I can attempt the spelling of names, from hearing Son Akers rattle them off , they are as follows:

Neil Armstrong, Buzz Aldrin, Werner von Braun, Robert Eminare (filmmaker), Jean [or Gene?] Crag, James Will, Joe Perrin, Dr Thomas Payne, Lan Loddy,  Dr Crout [or Kraut?], General Trudeau, Lt Col Donald Sims, Grant Norray “of the FBI or CIA or NSA,” and — wait for it — Dr James Van Allen (after whom the Belt was named).

I don’t know if you will believe the video. But if you do believe it, you will be mighty pissed off, as I am, to think how we are made fools of.  I am particularly furious that my parents were thusly mocked. Not that they were into science; they were simply watching it on TV and would have felt proud.

Retch! And the very day of the landing was my father’s 70th birthday. He was born on July 20, 1899. Also, when “we landed on the moon” it was the day after Ted Kennedy had had a problem at Cape Cod with a girl, Mary Jo Kopechne, who drove off a bridge in his car and drowned at Chappaquiddick.

Come to think of it, that was a false flag of sorts. Let me quote from page 19 of my 2011 book “Prosecution for Treason.” I learned of this from a 1971 book by Zad Rust, entitled Teddy Bare:

“The next morning, July 21, 1969, Mary Jo’s body was sent to her home state on a Kennedy-chartered plane, thus avoiding Massachusetts’ autopsy jurisdiction. A deputy sheriff, Christopher Look, had said he saw the car on dry ground an hour after it supposedly tumbled, but he was not called to testify….

“The grand jury was run by Judge Paquet. At the hearing he brought with him and invited to his bench the Rev Donald Cousa who offered a short prayer ‘for prejudice to be set aside and replace by charity’.”

Retch!

Now for the movie. It was uploaded by Bart Sibrel on September 13, 2022. Has 109,000 views so far.  And has not been deleted from YouTube!

 

SHARE

99 COMMENTS

  1. There are some problems with the studio story. It can be read both ways. When I was in Sri Lanka in 1994 making a movie, one night the rigger/crane operator got drunk and spilled the beans. He built camera cranes and we used this in the movie. He had Mowgli (Jungle book) swinging thru the trees by hanging under the crane.

    But his story went like this: He was employed to build a crane and operate it on a MOON SET. The crane was to bounce the astronaut along the moon surface. He told us that they were watching a ‘live stream’ of the moon landing and imitating the movements of the astronauts and that if the live feed was cut the broadcast would cut to their studio. After hours of this he wasn’t quite sure if they were following the TV monitor or not, and was thinking “are we just following another studio”.

    It’s admitted they had studios, and the large moon model. So one can be duped by numerous studio accounts and trials. There’s this classic ‘ladder falling’ — ‘let’s do another take.

    • My father worked at the LRO Station in Carnarvon WA which was a joint OZ and NASA project and I’ll never forget the look on his face when my brother and I told him we had just watched man land on the moon on our little TV in the kitchen. He looked at me, looked at my brother and then looked back at me. He said nothing and walked away. His name was Oscar Watzl and his name is on the honour roll of Carnarvon LRO. He was also a CDC for Hawker de Havilland, Plessey and Texas Instruments back in the 70s. I learned a lot from him. He showed me the first laptop back around 1974.

  3. But there is so much wrong with the ‘evidence’. The footage found in the capsule and how they faked the earth looking far away; the radiation readings in their suits indicated they hadn’t gone higher than the space station; the NASA guy from Orion saying man hasn’t ventured therough the van Halen Belt etc.

    I find this a fascinating topic — and good MM for publishing the confession video.

    Some old articles:

    https://gumshoenews.com/50-years-ago-man-landed-on-the-moon/

    And I think one of my favorite articles:

    https://gumshoenews.com/the-armstrong-parallel-two-extraordinary-americans-one-confirmed-lie-and-one-undecided/

    “Today is the final day of the 2015 Tour de France – and this month, 46 years ago (July 20 1969), Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin stepped on the moon.

    The name, “Armstrong” represents two extraordinary Americans, both exceptional in their field; One a superbly skilled and bold test pilot, and astronaut – the other, possibly the most exceptional cyclist ever seen (even with the help of EPO).

    NASA sent men to walk on the moon SIX times – and Lance Armstrong won the Tour de France SEVEN times. Just one too many. The seventh win tipped the scales of believability – and it was most likely his demise.

    Maybe NASA knew their luck would run out – one way or another – on #7, and called it a day.

    (The Tour de France is the world’s largest annual sporting event, lasting 3 weeks as the cyclist ride about 3,500 miles (mainly through France). About 3.5 to 4 billion people watch the Tour de France annually in 188 countries around the world.

    The team bus, which had been transformed into a secret blood transfusion unit, went undetected – even though Lance was the epicenter of attention of about 2,000 journalists and thousands of support staff.)

    “The recreation of footage is well documented. There are anomalies in many photographs that point to stage lighting; there was the coke bottle incident (only seen by Perth viewers); the “c” mark on the rock; duplicate backdrops; photographic cross-hair inconsistencies and much more. I have pointed out in the past to the pool stage lighting effects, and another give-away is that all the camera work and the photography is always near perfect – and almost all the same.

    This does not mean they did not get to the moon. This means NASA preferred to use recreated footage (or just mix up the footage).

    NASA was doing a “Lance” on the population. NASA was “doping” and MANIPULATING the footage.

    • You know I used to give NASA the benefit of the doubt as far back as probably 2011 and I was becoming aware of 9/11 being other than they told us and the federal reserve act of 1913 and the central banks .
      Who would of thought you can’t trust the banks and it appears that the science is not to be questioned! I was of the opinion that science was and should always be open to question, or was that religion I’m thinking of ?
      I guess when the thread is pulled it is impossible to push it back and the whole yarn will come undone,
      The question I think that most would ask is why would they lie about it ? It is a good thing that it is not incumbent upon us to answer that, we just have to point out the inconsistencies for long enough and the reason why the lie will become a self evident truth I feel in the fullness of time.
      If we have been lied to about pretty much everything we thought we knew from cradle to grave and becoming aware that it was a belief system we had and not an actual knowing. As unsettling as it is, it does make it very fertile ground for self-development as individuals and as communities.
      Why some people have cognitive dissonance and can not see it and others can see it more readily, can be a mystery for the ages , but we can teach each other humility and patience in this journey.
      Thanks Dee!

    • Nobody has come out to dispute whether all the equipment on the ground was able to do the job or not, from this telescope to the Saturn 5 rocket to the lunar module and space-suits, it all seems viable enough to me in the late 60’s, whether they wanted to pay for all the missions is another question and the dune buggy was a bit excessive especially with the weight of batteries and the primitive solar panels. I would guess they did have backup videos for cold war propaganda and the dune buggy was probably exuberance, a hoax. Everyone had dune buggies back then in California, the US must have confiscated lots of VolksWagens for ww2 reparations.

    • I used to be a computer engineer that worked on complex mainframe systems. The early computer memories were ‘ferrous core’ memories or sometimes referred to as ‘rope’ memories. The ferrous core memories that I worked on were very robust and the memories used on the space flights were even more robust. – They no longer make such memories.

      Further, the electronics were very robust as they were discreet components such as transistors, resistors, capacitors and the like. They were not the complex integrated circuits (ICs) you find in your smart phone.

      Those complex ICs are very easy to damage. As the computer industry advanced, we had to ground ourselves with a wrist band to prevent any static electricity we might be carrying from discharging through the IC and burning out the circuitry.

      It truly is a ‘Back to the Future’ to re-create the robust systems that were used 50 years ago.

    • From a comment by ArjunV on December 23, 2019 at 12:19 pm

      Faking the moon landing in 1968 would have been harder than just going there – therefore they went.

      • Why the Moon Landing COULDN’T Have Been Faked | Adam Ruins Everything

      I have read Moondoggie – most excellent, delightfully satirical style.

  10. • EXCLUSIVE: Buzz Aldrin Confirms UFO Sighting in Syfy’s ‘Aliens on the Moon
    (“Entertainment Tonight” channel – where it belongs)

    • Robert Emenegger on using actual footage from a UFO landing at Holloman AFB for his 1974 documentary
    (“Eyes On Cinema @RealEOC presents: Eyes On UFOs” channel – where it belongs)

  13. Orbiting the earth, avoiding satellites, I get it.
    Landing on the moon with a ‘tardis’ holding a beach buggy, sounds a bit like Bin Laden directing with a walkie talkie from a cave in Afghanistan….BS.

    I was 14, when grandfather said they landed in Nevada. Then again, he wasn’t a scientist, only a farmer fisherman carving stones to build houses. His words, make more sense now than then.

    Agree with Berry, it’s pointless and a wasted effort.

  16. Iran and Iraq were pawns of the Oil majors. Each has/had a problem with Sunni, in Iran and Shia, in Iraq. So they had a war. Elite, ie loyal units, made sure the conscripts were sent out, mostly the dissidents.

    Horrifying, right?

    Then we have Aceh, during a ceasefire!

    Fukushima has questionable justification, since it was to encourage disarmament of plutonium possessed by Nippon

  17. Patrick, I dinna ken this:

    “Fukushima has questionable justification, since it was to encourage disarmament of plutonium possessed by Nippon”

    Are you talking about the tsunami’s aftereffects?

    • Japan has refused to send its stock of Plutonium ‘back’ to Europe. It is in breach of contract and while not having signed the Treaty, the Non Proliferation Pact.

      The USA, who else?, used their newly enhanced Tsunami weapon to send an unmistakable message. A 6.2 EQ that caused mild alarm in EQ savvy Japan, but that also detonated millions of tons of clathrates on the ocean bed.

      All theur nuclear power plant is on the coast and susceptible to repeat visits…. so they shut down the lot of them and have still refused to ‘disarm’. They have ICBM capability and it is reckined that 24 hours means they could fashion up to 5,000 warheads.

      Japan and the USA have been at war since 2011.

      We live in interesting times!

    • How much radiation are the astronauts exposed to on the ISS? originally appeared on Quora: the place to gain and share knowledge, empowering people to learn from others and better understand the world.

      https://www.forbes.com/sites/quora/2018/11/13/how-much-radiation-are-iss-astronauts-exposed-to/?sh=18aead1018a9

      Answer by Robert Frost, works at NASA, on Quora:

      For ISS astronauts, measurements from the crew’s personal dosimeters indicate a range from 12 to 28.8 milli rads per day.

      The number is not a constant because radiation comes from more than one source. There are galactic cosmic rays (GCR) and solar cosmic rays (SCR). There is also radiation trapped within the magnetic field, auroral precipitation, and albedo radiation. Activity of the sun and location of the ISS both cause significant variations in the amount of radiation that impinges on the International Space Station. Radiation is higher at higher latitudes, so, since the ISS flies at an inclination of 51.6 degrees, it experiences more radiation than it would at 28 degrees (standard inclination for Space Shuttle flights). Altitude also affects the dosage. We’ve set a danger line at 500 km (312 mi). At 500 km, the average daily dose is around 50 milli rad (5x10E-4 Sv). Shielding within the different ISS habitable modules also varies.

      There are locations over Earth, such as the South Atlantic anomaly (SAA), where radiation is higher at lower altitudes. In fact, a significant portion of the radiation experienced by the crew occurs when their orbit takes them over the SAA. At 440 km, within the SAA, the radiation can be 1000 times as intense.

      Much of the solar cosmic radiation is deflected by the Earth’s magnetic field, which, fortunately, is above low Earth orbit (LEO). An astronaut on the moon could receive a lethal dose of radiation in just a couple of hours, during a solar flare.

      The Multilateral Medical Operations Panel (MMOP) monitors and sets the standards for crew exposure. They track to separate limits that are referred to as deterministic and stochastic. Deterministic refers to acute effects such as rashes and burns and stochastic to long-term effects, such as cancer. It can get a little confusing because they use different units for each concern. But, for example, they set a 30 day exposure limit of 0.25 Sv and an annual limit of 0.5 Sv and a career limit of 1 Sv. A sievert (Sv) is equivalent to 100 rads.

      This question originally appeared on Quora – the place to gain and share knowledge, empowering people to learn from others and better understand the world. You can follow Quora on Twitter, Facebook, and Google+. More questions:

      International Space Station: If you put ISS in rotation, in a static position, will it create gravity for crew?
      Earth: Does the rotation of the earth causes seasons?
      Outer Space: How hazardous is outer space?

  27. • Von Braun’s Legacy (with Dr. Carol Rosin)

    I believe von Braun was a fraud and an exhibitionist [most probably a high-ranking freemason from some ‘nobility blood line” that happened to live in Germany – AND therefore opposed to National Socialism] fixated with the concept of travelling to the moon. His mentor Hermann Oberth was a technical advisor on “Woman on the Moon” produced by Fritz Lang.

    • Trailer – FRAU IM MOND 1929

    • Thank you Gary

      19:00
      “you add the drones – you add the microdust – you add in the beam weapons that they tell us they have. They also have a blast wave accelerator. And when you look at the population of the United States, the majority of the population lives along the coastlines. And the blast wave accelerator was a tidal wave invention that the United States dreamt up with the Soviet Union back in the 40s.

      Pars and ponder that sentence very carefully …

      the blast wave accelerator was a tidal wave invention that the United States dreamt up with the Soviet Union back in the 40s.

      And more …
      21:40
      “One of the reasons they send our men and women off to war is to reduce the population … “

      THIS IS ESSENTIAL VIEWING … continuing …

      • Shite!
        And the blast wave accelerator was a tidal wave invention that the United States dreamt up with the Soviet Union back in the 40s.

        As with Covid (or vax, OK Mal?), if science can use the laws of physics in a creative way, there ain’t no stopping the scientist (methinks).

    • was talking to other friends about this last night, and i told them i remembered reading a very good argument, about why they would not expose the hoax. unfortunately both some sections of my memory, and some internet addresses, are equally incapable of being accessed these days.. but..

      as best my recollection, it boiled down to a situation where russia interests were more favoured by not exposing the hoax than if they did expose it.

      not the first time they have either collaborated or at least acted in ways that benefited “both” sides, if indeed they are separate entities..

      maybe they both have the same masters. they .. like the US – probably dont tell us lots of thing

  35. The enemy uses sorcery, brainwashing people into believing lies that are 180 degrees opposed to common sense and survival.
    Thumb twitching kids should be learning how to garden and build stuff, skills that make them independent of the beast system.
    The oligarchy prefers we remain stupid and dependant on their satanic corporate communism that is debt slavery.
    Dog eat dog culture encouraging treachery in the workplace and punishing morality, with the honest finishing last.
    Massive myth is maintained by law in crown nations. So what, if we went to the moon?
    Babies are injected with poisons and elites drink their blood and our mass worship the BS.

      • “None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free”
        – Johann Wolfgang Von Goethe

        Which part of the Communist Manifesto does Australia not follow and why is it becoming more of a totalitarian State every day?

        Isaiah 9:15-16, “The elder and the lifted of face, he is the head; and the prophet who teaches lies, he is the tail ( symbolising a snake! ) For this peoples leaders are led astray, and its guided ones are destroyed”.

        Politicians publicly pray in their synagogue [congregation- called a parliament], for our Father, Lord and God [John 20:28] to deliver them from evil and to forgive them of their debts as they forgive others of their debts. What Hypocrites

    • That would send the value of the fiat money quickly to zero and then we would all have to go back to using gold and silver which would indeed be more sane, since 90% of the finance (gambling) sector would have to get real jobs

  37. Mind-numbingly dull M$M coffin chasers have buried the Pacific rim news, big earthquakes in Taiwan (south east) and Mexico (west), plenty of video just search.

  42. Start at 3 minutes. God save our prez-i-dent, long live our prez-i-dent, God save Joe Biden….

    Send him victorious, happy and glorious,
    Long too-oo riegn over us, u-until we im-peach.

  46. I took notice of the black and white Freemasons chequered floor on which they placed the Queens coffin today.

    The Checkered Flooring

    https://freemasoninformation.com/banks-of-the-euphrates/the-checkered-flooring

    The mosaic pavement in an old symbol of the Order. It is met with in the earliest rituals of the last century. It is classed among the ornaments of the lodge along with the indented tessel and the blazing star. Its party-colored stones of black and white have been readily and appropriately interpreted as symbols of the evil and good of human life.

  47. I really like Tim Alberino’s take on this issue – namely that NASA DID go to to the moon but they found “alien/nephilim” tech already there. This explains several vexing issues, namely this is why they HAD TO get Kubrik to re-film it all in a studio, to hide the tech. It explains why they (NASA) never went back to the moon (not as a civilian project anyway but instead as $Trillion DEFENCE Projects). It explains the obviously depressed countenances of the astronauts at the first presser where they were obviously told to claim up, much to their distress. It explains where the breakaway civilisation got their tech from, including DUMBs & the”UAPs” currently being clumsily disclosed to assist the establishment of world government/religion.

  48. x22 (2878b) is reporting Elon Musk said “Starlink” is ready to go on all continents including Antarctica”
    Biden has cancelled the scamdemic, “it’s over but we are still working hard”
    M$M reviews:
    The Guardian: Is Truth Social another of Trump’s bungled businesses ?
    Forbes: Is it time to close Trump’s Truth Social ?
    BBC: Trump’s Truth Social barred from Google Play
    Rollingstone: Trump’s social media company is trying to hide it’s struggles
    Politico: What the Truth Social Flop Says About Trump
    Youtube: Trump Truth Social Investors LOSE LIFE SAVINGS and VENT …
    MSNBC: Trump’s Truth Social media platform is a perfect mess
    Inquirer: Trump’s disastrous launch of Truth Social raises doubts about …

    • And Tucker Carlson is saying the planeload of Venezuelan border crossers that Florida Governor Ron DeSantis sent to Martha’s Vineyard (a luxury holiday island for super rich chardonnay socialists people near Cape Cod) were bussed away somewhere after 44 hours, he tried to contact them for comment but the chardonnay socialists had them locked up in a detention centre, incommunicado.
      Other US politics news, something about Kamala getting some VP powers stripped maybe as a precursor to Crazy Nancy taking over ??? I thought Nancy was running Biden, x22 says Obama is running him, so probably both fighting over him

C'mon Leave a Reply, Debate and Add to the Discussion

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.