Home News Systemic Injustice by Judges. Whew!  And a New Look at Bill Gates

Systemic Injustice by Judges. Whew!  And a New Look at Bill Gates

30

Atty William Sumner Scott, in a presentation to a public hearing in 2016, Att William Sumner Scott, in a presentation to a public hearing in 2016, Photo:YouTube.com

by Mary W Maxwell, LLB

I have often found that judges (including US Supreme Court justices) betray the law in their rulings. Indeed, I have talked about it at length, in five of my books. But I rarely see anyone take on that problem directly. Sure, a federal judge can be impeached. (Eight judges, in the US’s 250-year history, have gone down the gurgler that way.) And some states have set up panels to judge a judge. But the panel members are often – you guessed it — judges.

William Sumner Scott, an attorney of the New Jersey Bar, has discovered a new approach. I will tell this story chronologically. It involves Scott trying to blow the whistle on Bill Gates.

Over the years, Congress has provided ways for citizens to file whistleblower claims. And, going back to the common law, there has also been a way to file a Qui Tam suit, in which one points out to the king that His Majesty is being defrauded. The person who brings a whistleblower action, or a qui tam suit, may hope to be paid for helping to correct the situation.

“Scott Versus Gates” (or Bill v Bill)

Scott first noted – quite apart from any issues of Covid’s criminality – that Bill Gates was cheating the government of taxes. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation claimed to be a charity, to assist health — particularly in the Third World. As a charity, it did not have to pay taxes. But, according to Scott, the Gates’s Foundation heavily promoted vaccinations, which added to their family’s wealth. At one point, Bill Gates boasted that his return on investment in Vaccine manufacture was 20 to 1.

Attorney Scott looked up the details of how to report to the IRS (Internal Revenue Service) that such-and-such a person who runs a ‘charity’ should not have the tax-free status, as the charity is making a profit. Thus he filed as a whistleblower, regarding Gates, back on May 24, 2024. The IRS replied by dismissing his filing without even looking into the facts, completing its normal review forms, or contacting Scott.

On October 24, 2024, Scott appealed the IRS decision to the US District Court for Southern Florida, claiming that the law says IRS is obliged to investigate such matters. The US Department of Justice, rather than causing the IRS to investigate Scott’s claims against Gates, came to the defense of Gates against Scott. The District Court, too, in response to a DOJ Motion, immediately dismissed Scott’s appeal!  Scott took a further appeal to the US Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit in Atlanta, GA.

My article here is based on Scott’s latest filing of a “Reply” to the Court of Appeal that strikes me as a major breakthrough for good law. As an aside, in that Reply, dated January 12, 2026, Scott requests that the appeals court take judicial notice (per Federal Rules of Evidence 201) of a pending case in the Netherlands, and its interim ruling of November 26, 2025. I quote:

“In this action, private plaintiffs have asserted claims against William H. Gates III and others (including Albert Bourla, former Dutch officials, and the Dutch State), of misleading promotion of, and the effects of, COVID-19 mRNA injections—characterized by the plaintiffs as constituting bioweapons.”

Scott points out that, owing to the Covid vaccine, there have been more that 80,000 deaths or serious health problems, worldwide. He is NOT referring to the people who are said to have died from Covid; rather he is estimating the number who have died or suffered serious health problems from taking the vaccination. Recall that the vax was mandatory for many classes of people, including college students, military, and nurses, but not for politicians and judges.

For me, the number of deaths-from-vaccination ought to cause prosecutors to charge Gates for murder or manslaughter, but Scott has found Gates intentional or gross negligence sufficient to make his claim that the IRS take away his Foundation’s vaccine related 501(c)(3) charity designation. Unfortunately, not only did the IRS not investigate Scott’s claims, but the District Court also denied him access to discovery and a hearing.

The Kitchen Sink

As of 2026, Scott has decided to throw the kitchen sink at the courts. I will now switch to a matter, separate from Gates or Covid, one in which the behavior of judges stands out. Scott lists the examples of two 2023 cases. One is Brook Jackson v Ventavia Research Group. There, the court approved the FDA’s disregard of clinical norms in the collection of data, which rendered all of the data unreliable.

The other case is that of plaintiff Deborah Conrad suing Rochester Hospital, where she reported failures to properly report vaccine caused deaths and health injuries. In that case, the Court limited the inquiry to the deficient reporting of vaccine injuries to only those where the hospital injected the vaccines rather than all of the deaths and injuries that occurred at the hospital.

So VAERS reports vaccine deaths and harm are also unreliable and the court does not want to go into how deep the problem could be. In that case, the Court limited the inquiry to the deficient reporting of vaccine injuries to only those where the hospital injected the vaccines rather than all of the deaths and injuries that occurred at the hospital.

(“Any port in a storm,” I’d say. Too often we see courts either dismissing or limiting valid claims). In a third case, United States v Plastic Surgery Institute of Utah, Inc., that was dismissed on July 12, 2025, please see video below. Dr Michael Kirk Moore had been accused of completing government vaccine id cards to prove the person was vaccinated when Dr. Moore knew he did not vaccinate them or, for children, with parents’ consent, he injected them with a harmless saline solution.

Scott says: “These decisions and the lower court decision here are intended to preserve the government claim that Operation Warp Speed was a success with limited or no review of the merits.” And “This leaves the public without remedy for the FDA and Gates failures while judges gave themselves an exemption from the Covid vaccine mandate.”

Scott does not stop at the particulars of Warp Speed. (By the way, I think I was first cab off the rank to fight Warp Speed in 2020. See Maxwell v Secretary of Defense et al, which I appealed, unavailingly, to the First Circuit, case number 20 cv 01193 PB. It was based on Fourth Amendment protections.)

To strengthen his case, Scott reports some disgusting statistics that reveal the judiciary’s ability to coverup criticism of itself:

“[There is a] lack of recourse under the Judicial Conduct and Disability Act (28 U.S.C. §351), where complaints [against judges] are dismissed without investigation. Recent data shows that in the 12-month period ending September 30, 2024, 1,510 new complaints were filed, while 1,710 were dismissed (including those from prior periods). The average dismissal rate over a ten-year period is approximately 99% — rendering the judicial complaint process illusory and leaving litigants without meaningful review of potential judicial bias.”

Now let’s look at ‘the camouflage effect.’ “The fact that Gates vaccine efforts were, And continue to be, classified a charity by the IRS camouflages the frauds and supports the courts, DOJ, and IRS prevention of the proper evaluation of the damage caused by the Gates for-profit efforts in regard to the Covid-19 vaccines.”

Slavery and Lack of Access to the Courts

Those of us who are old today can recall how refreshing it was, during the Civil Rights Movement of the 1960s, that African Americans suddenly got the wherewithal to stand up in court and “tell it like it is.” Before that, they lacked a podium. Same now for all of us, regarding the huge sins of Covid with full-on Coverup. Scott says: “Allowing Judicial and DOJ defenses, without addressing the conflict, perpetuates silencing whistleblowers contrary to §7623(b).”

Rule 12 is a well-known framework for denying access to the courts. Scott points out that it is systemic, and it dates back to the 1788 ratification of the US Constitution. (Article IV, Section 2, Clause 3 of the un-amended U.S. Constitution, requiring return of escaped slaves. It supported the notorious decision in the Dred Scott case of 1857.)

“Subsequently, the United States fought a civil war to abolish slavery. However, the underlying judicial framework that had enforced slavery— implemented through the Judiciary Act of 1789 (1 Stat. 73) — remained unchanged. Although abolitionists on occasion were permitted access to courts to challenge slavery (e.g., Prigg v. Pennsylvania, 1842), the framework was designed to exclude abolitionists and others opposed to official government policies and narratives [!]

This has persisted post-Civil War. Scott says Rule 12(b)(1) evolved to serve as a gatekeeping tool that bars merit reviews. (Granted, US Courts have recently expanded exceptions for merits considerations.)

CONCLUSION

William Sumner Scott’s Reply, filed on January 12, 2026, as document 62 in the US 11th Circuit Court of Appeals at case number 25-10509, concludes with: “This case must be remanded with instructions:

“1. For appointment of an unbiased independent special master or referral to the Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) for investigation of Scott’s Form 211 claim that the Gates entities had sufficient control or were negligent in the covid virus and vaccines creation, approval and distribution process and, therefore, should be classified as for-profit enterprises, subject to corporate taxes rather than be exempt as 501(c)(3) charities; and

“2. for direction to the lower court and DOJ to reassess their roles and change course to investigate alleged IRS malfeasance.”

Postscript by Mary Maxwell

I expect many readers will be uncomfortable with my wanting to ‘discipline’ our judges. Sure, that’s how I felt for a long time, too. They are considered sacred, as they ought to be — judges are “law” and law is justice. But the decision to make them sacred came from us in the first place, and if they no longer fit the bill, what is the point of re-charging a deception?

If a judge has chosen to work for someone other than the People, we do not have to put up with that. Quite possibly he or she has been terribly pressured into his/her perfidy. So what? We don’t have to put up with it, and we certainly should not honor it.

Mary W Maxwell’s latest book is “The Constitutional Kiosk: What To Do When Our Government Is Anti-Law.” It is a free download at her website: www.ConstitutionAndTruth.com

Below is the Dr Moore case in Utah. He had given out cards of allegedly having vaccinated the patient. But the government suddenly dropped all charges. I’m guessing that US Attorney General Pam Bondi figured that the only way to avoid Discovery was to chirp “Nolle prosequi.”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OeFtquLWFPQ&t=640s

30 COMMENTS

  7. Want to face injustice? REALLY!
    Then invest 107 mins of your time and invest in educating your grandchildren.
    ‘SHEILA HOLM (and Scott McKay?) MAJOR SHOCK 1/16/26 ITS GONNA (sic) HIT MASSIVE A FIGHT IS COMING’ (what an understatement – if you have been following for the last ten years!)
    At least note first-7 mins but keep going to 107 at
    http://www.beforeitsnews.com. People powered news to face REALITY AND EXPOSING THEIR LIES.
    I am off to the library to get Sheila’s book.
    1007

    • Well well, guess what!
      Went to the DOIBLE BAY PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SAW A LONG LUST IF SHEILA’s BOOKS BUT THE LIBRARY HAS NOT EVEN INE OF THEM.
      Wonder why not?
      Find out listen to the interview at BIN referred to above🙀💁🤪
      1147

  8. People, People!! Please go back to a 2022 Gumshoe article. entitled “Letter to South Australian Senator,” by Elizabeth Hart. Scroll down to the first Comment by Dee, where she shows us a 40-minute InfoWars talk
    https://gumshoenews.com/letter-to-south-australian-senator-and-humanitys-dependency-on-vaccine-induced-immunity/
    Yes, back in 2017 Fauci said “There will be a new virus…” it is worth watching the whole thing.

    It also says Bill Gates organised the propaganda in advance.

    • “But Kevin’s revelations didn’t stop at Canada’s borders. In 2010, he founded the International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State, a citizen-led court aimed at prosecuting global elites for crimes against humanity. Through ITCCS, he escalated his accusations, linking residential school horrors to a vast international network. His most recent explosive claims center on the “Ninth Circle Cult,” a secret society of high-ranking figures – including Vatican officials, European royals, and politicians – who engage in ritual child sacrifices dating back centuries. Kevin whistleblows eyewitness testimonies of Ninth Circle ceremonies in Vatican basements and remote estates, where children from orphanages and trafficking rings were ritually abused and killed to appease ancient occult rites.

      The Vatican stands at the cult’s rotten core. He accuses former Popes Benedict and Francis of direct involvement, claiming Benedict resigned in 2013 amid ITCCS arrest warrants for genocide and child trafficking. His books, like Hidden No Longer: Genocide in Canada, Past and Present (2010), compile survivor affidavits, historical documents, and forensic evidence of mass graves, exposing the Vatican as a millennia-old perpetrator of Indigenous and child exploitation.

      Continuing from our last interview, Kevin and his team have discovered a whole new area of crime involving the use of ICE detainees as involuntary human test subjects in Elon Musk’s Neuralink experiments in brain chipping, relying on the usual Vatican financial involvement and Trump endorsement. Kevin will lay out the new evidence today that the court has uncovered about this latest crime against humanity and describe what citizens are doing on the ground to stop it.”

      • And if one listens to Sheila HOLM referred to up a bit at BIN, people will understand how the evil Kevin refers to is based and continuing.
        1157

  10. I note a free speech article is next so this will probably be one of the last comments on the subject article. However it is opportune for me to make my last comment. I thought of a couple of headings:
    JUSTICE IS A MOST MYSTERIOUS RIDDLE.
    BRING OUT YOUR DEAD.
    At first I felt so sorry for humanity but after 17 mins a possible answer appeared from MICHAEL JACO AND SCOTT.
    One has to give it some thought and decide……. And HOPE.
    At:
    http://www.beforeitsnews.com – people powered news.
    ‘M J and S M game over 1/17/26 deep state battle’
    I think some might start noting the ‘med bed’ reports from real Mary in her commentaries. ……… I have family too!
    12- 52

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.