Home Australia Letter To South Australian Senator and Humanity’s Dependency on Vaccine-induced Immunity

Letter To South Australian Senator and Humanity’s Dependency on Vaccine-induced Immunity

72

For the attention of:

Alex Antic

Australian Senator

Liberal Party, South Australia

Alex, tomorrow [19 March 2022] South Australians head to the polls, severely ill-equipped to make a decision on their political future.

For the past two years, the electorate has been misled and lied to about Covid-19, with the Morrison and Marshall governments, and other state and territory governments, pumping out fear-mongering propaganda via the mainstream media, to back the grossly disproportionate and ill-targeted Covid-19 response, as I raised with you previously in my email: Covid-19 jab mandates, the media/propaganda, and elections… 8 March 2022.

People are compelled to vote, but most are not equipped to make an informed vote, because they’ve been so grossly misinformed by the propaganda pouring forth from politicians and the mainstream media and others. It’s a dire situation, because so many of the candidates have betrayed the electorate with their complicity in the extraordinary controls which stole South Australians’ free movement and association, and bodily autonomy and bodily integrity via Covid-19 jab mandates.

The South Australian election, and the upcoming federal election, are now shrouded in illegitimacy due to the gross abuse that has been heaped upon the electorate for the past two years. Rogue governments have used ’emergency laws’ to disenfranchise the people, there is no accountability. 

The Marshall government in South Australia has refused to provide proof of ‘the emergency’ which has been used to constrain South Australians for the past two years, with no satisfactory response forthcoming to my email to Steven Marshall, see: Curtailing the free movement of South Australians – Questions for SA Premier Steven Marshall, 20 July 2021. My email to Steven Marshall was in response to his government sending the entire state into lockdown, on the back of 14 active ‘cases’, causing chaos across the state, disruption everywhere, including delaying treatment and operations for people in hospitals, closure of schools, closure of construction sites, effectively bringing normal life to a standstill, impacting on livelihoods, and family and social interaction. It’s incredible to think of the hysterical Covid-19 response by the Marshall government and other governments around Australia.

Chief Public Health Officer Nicola Spurrier has personally urged South Australians to have the Covid-19 injections. In June 2021 I raised the subject of informed consent before vaccination with Nicola Spurrier in my email Coercive covid-19 injections in Australia, 4 June 2021. No notice was taken of my arguments, and subsequently Covid-19 jab mandates were imposed in South Australia from November 2021, i.e. No Jab, No Job for many people, signed off by police commissioner Grant Stevens, see for example: Emergency Management (Healthcare Setting Workers Vaccination No 7) (COVID-19 Direction 22, (copy attached). I also raised the principle of informed consent with Lesley Dwyer, Chief Executive Officer of the Central Adelaide Local Health Network, see my email Is it ethical to insist on covid-19 injections for health staff? 7 July 2021. But again my arguments were ignored.

South Australians are still compelled to wear masks inside public places. In January 2022 I asked police commissioner Grant Stevens to provide evidence to support this imposition, see my email Covid-19 restrictions – masks. I received the response “…the State Coordinator acts on the best available advice from relevant experts, including the Chief Public Health Officer and her team at SA Health”. In other words, no evidence was provided…

Alex, your recent media release Covid Theatre Alert! provides a link to the meager ‘evidence’ backing the Marshall government’s onerous restrictions imposed in response to Covid-19. Your initial analysis of this ‘evidence’ indicates there is “Nothing to support the mandates, nothing to support the coercion, nothing to support the theatre of putting masks on as you walk to your seat and then take them off when you sit down. NOTHING”.

What do we face if the Marshall government is returned tomorrow, given the arbitrary rules and blatant lack of accountability for the past two years? The situation could be even worse if Peter Malinauskas becomes premier, judging by the Labor tyrants dominating other states and territories, i.e. Daniel Andrews, Mark McGowan, Michael Gunner and Annastacia Palaszczuk, who have set in place discrimination and segregation against critical thinking people who have refused the defective Covid-19 jabs.

The grossly disproportionate and ill-targeted Covid-19 response, with its one-eyed focus on a mass population ‘vaccine’ solution, is a disaster…and things could get much worse if things go even further awry with the defective Covid-19 jabs. This is a massive experiment which is being conducted upon the world’s people, without valid voluntary consent. How did this happen? It’s way past time to evaluate the situation. In this regard, please see my recent email to senator Gerard Rennick: Call for urgent examination of vaccination policy, including the Covid-19 jab rollout, 15 March 2022.

My email to Gerard Rennick includes an alarming statement, i.e. “We’ve shifted the human population…to dependency on vaccine-induced immunity…We’re in a very fragile state now. We have developed a world that is dependent on vaccinations”, made by Heidi Larson, Director of the Vaccine Confidence Project, during the WHO Global Vaccine Safety Summit in December 2019, just as SARS-CoV-2 was appearing on the scene… I transcribed Heidi Larson’s plenary lecture given at this WHO summit, please see copy attached, including my highlighting. This transcript should be considered very carefully by people investigating vaccination policy. The Vaccine Confidence Project is all about promoting vaccine products…but people associated with this organisation are reluctant to disclose conflicts of interest. I discuss this in my rapid response published on The BMJ (The British Medical Journal), see: ‘Pharma-led chorus’ dominates the public narrative on vaccination, 6 February 2019.

We’re facing an unprecedented plan to repeatedly inject the entire global population with defective Covid-19 jabs that don’t prevent infection nor transmission…against a disease it was known from the beginning wasn’t a serious threat for most people. This is on top of a burgeoning vaccination schedule which has been protected from scrutiny for years. It’s way past time to shine the spotlight on taxpayer-funded vaccination policy, this area has been colonised by the vaccine industry and its associates in academia.

For example, consider the influence of the vaccine industry-funded Immunisation Coalition, which is funded by vaccine promoters Pfizer, Moderna, CSL/Seqirus, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi, Biocelect, and MSD (aka Merck). Members of this vaccine promoting organisation, which is very influential over the medical profession, pop up regularly in the media touting their professional affiliations and promoting vaccine products, including Robert Booy, Raina MacIntyre, Paul Griffin, Margie Danchin, Mary-Louise McLaws, Katie Attwell etc, but they often seem reluctant to fully disclose their conflicts of interest, e.g. their membership of this vaccine industry-funded organisation.

Alex, we have to talk about this now, about the increasing ‘vaccine load’ that’s being imposed from cradle to grave – this subject must be on the table before the federal election which is likely to be held in May 2022, including examination of Scott Morrison, the Murdoch media/News Corp Australia, and No Jab, No Pay/No Play.

I request your acknowledgment of this email and your response on this matter.

Kind regards

Elizabeth Hart

Independent person investigating the gross over-use of vaccine products and conflicts of interest in vaccination policy. vaccinationispolitical.net

 

SHARE

72 COMMENTS

  2. Presuming Alex is a typical politician, there will be no reply. They are gutless and do not represent their conned ..stuents..
    If I am wrong the Senator will reply and ‘please explain’. But she will not and would be up to the usual political ‘Antics’ …… lies.

    • I’ve met Alex several times and he’s a good guy – very well informed and a good man with Christian values. To assert that he is gutless if he fails to reply to every email is unfair.

  3. This is not fiction this is a reality–propaganda theatre-they exchange truth for lies-evil is very real–a war plan–medical tyranny–the blueprint is set–a futuristic script– they don’t deny they are wargaming– 2025–2028– no it is now–Wow– it is happening—a blueprint for the total take-over of society–going after children pregnant women –older citizens–the script is writ–neurological symptoms -6 months to a year later– John Hopkins Bloomberg school-??- a soft kill– adverse side effect–emerge–highly sophisticate military operation-just part of story.

    We do not deserve this–

      • You are all delusional.

        The mRNA jab campaign has been in the planning for forty-five years.

        These are highly intelligent manipulators who anticipated almost every every conceivable response to the mandate:

        Protests, rallies, legal challenges, recalcitrant politicians and bureaucrats, assassins, military rebellion, foreign rescues, international appeals, charasmatic rebels in the community, philosophical inspiration of strategic population centres, spontaneous emergence of new independent media, police refusal to cooperate… everything that might happen has been anticipated and a response installed decades ago.

        And still you hope for miracles.

        The so-called intellentsia, is the most deeply imbedded with the cultivated belief that “Non-violent peaceful protest” will win the psychopathic controllers over to decency and human compassion. Yet there is not a shred of evidence to support this hypothesis.

        Only the bogan working class automatically views such nonsense for what it is, but they are all jabbed, so they will fight back once they commence dying and realise the cause, which may never happen, because they reflect on and analyse nothing.

        The enemy knows full well it has all bases covered and that the rebellion that could so easily unseat them, will be delayed until too late.

          • The requirement of the hour is to stymie all fear based action/inaction
            And fear is not a physical phenomena per se

          • Those are mere words, based on no evidence whatsoever, for the simple reason that such evidence cannot be produced.

            And, anyway, re-labeling ‘self defense’ as “brute force” is a pathetic and transparent illogical extension.

            On the other hand, I have been attacked by groups who intended to injure me and I fought back and won, and on many occasions. Had I not taken the initiative I would be dead, several times over. Kindly permit me to accurately assess the threat of those circumstances, seeing I have the expertise and you, clearly, do not.

            This experience trumps your girly boarding school trite and substancless assertion, hands down.

            Outside of movies, anybody who does not meet violence with violence is either injured or dead.

            If you cannot grasp this reality, please desist from deriding those who do. I would bet you cannot even identify the genesis of your foolish beliefs. You simply sucked up whatever notions your peers deseminated, with no evidence whatsoever.

          • Oswald Mosley after the BUF Olympia meeting:

            “A collection of weapons taken from the attackers was afterwards made and the photographs are still on record. Our stewards had to eject these armed men with their bare hands, for they were not only forbidden to carry weapons, but were often searched to ensure the order was obeyed. Our Constitution laid down precise rules for dealing with disorders at meetings: ‘Interrupters will be ejected only on the instructions of the speaker as chairman of the meeting when the persistence of an interrupter prevents those in his vicinity from hearing the speech. Ejection will be carried out with the minimum of force necessary to secure the removal of the interrupter from the meeting.’ Were our stewards really to be blamed if they punched with their fists men who attacked them with ‘razors, knuckle-dusters and iron bars’? If they handled the opposition with such brutality, why was not a single case of that kind detained in London hospitals that night? At our own dressing-station, according to signed statements of highly qualified medical personnel: ‘Sixty-three Blackshirts were treated for injuries, mostly abdominal, and injuries caused by blunt instruments’; the injuries included, ‘Blackshirts kicked in the head and in the stomach and laid up for three weeks’… ‘girl Fascist with a scratch, commencing under her eye and running down her cheek and neck and finishing on her back, between her shoulder blades. I do not think this scratch could have been done with a finger nail, but that some sharp instrument must have been used. While treating this case, another girl Fascist was brought in; she had been struck by a man and her glasses smashed in her face. She was bleeding from the region of the left eye.’ A long list of these cases could be made, but no evidence was produced of similar injuries among the opposition or of any serious injuries at all.”

            Mosley was on about improving the slum dwellings, reducing employment, improving wages and shoring up the domestic economy against cheap imports – a nationalist ideology – and staying out of wars and imperialism.

            These policies were in direct opposition to those of the Jewish Oligarchs/communists – especially globalism versus benign nationalism and promoting endless wars.

            Another published eyewitness report:

            Mr. Patrick Dormer, M.P. wrote, for instance, in the National Review:

            “… that fact is that many of the Communists were armed with razors, stockings filled with broken glass, knuckle-dusters, and iron bars; that they marched from the East End, the police kindly escorting them, with the avowed purpose of wrecking the meeting. A friend of mine saw a woman Fascist with a razor-cut across her face, and with my own eyes I witnessed gangs of Communists (some of them dressed in black shirts to make identification of those responsible for the uproar more difficult) resisting ejection with the utmost violence. If then, as cannot be disputed, some of these hooligans were armed, can it in equity be argued that the stewards used their fists, when provoked in this manner, with more vigour than perhaps the situation required?”

        • I take it that you have no kept up to date with your favourite ‘jerk’ at
          X22Report.com. And other reports re military trials and consequences.
          Look up the principle of devolution, re US military running the US.
          Consider, that Biden has no power, thus cannot send in the military to the Ukraine for ww111 as being pushed by the banker globalists.
          Now who is really delusional? Be patient it will be apparent.

  5. “We do not live under the rule of law, we live under the rule of men corrupted by the law.”

    Ukraina has become the oligarchs hell on earth, for all things corrupt and illegal, at the bloodied hands of the Globalist Corporate Committee which is Global Government.

    If their plans are revealed, Agenda 2030 fails.

    Archbishop Vigano has proposed, the Anti-globalist Alliance, for all people to unite against the eugenicists evol dictatorship.

    As former pawns in their game, we need to unite and unshackle the chains around our necks, so all children can live in peace, harmony and joy, as recommended by Our Lord, with His two universal laws for the healing of all nations.

    • “We do not live under the rule of law, we live under the rule of men corrupted by the law.”

      I have pondered this quote and cannot make sense of it. How can one be corrupted by the Rule of Law? Unless, of course, the Law was corrupt in the first place.

      In that case, I would describe all western law as corrupt because it was the compromise outcome of conflict over repression.

      Not that it matters at this point in time, but I am wary of quotes that deceive people.

      • Tony,
        I have supplied labour and materials, on numerous occasions, and have not been payed for good work. On one misfortune, went to court thinking it would help, won two court cases and still had to pay legal costs! This system here is corrupt beyond redemption. As you know, there are those that are like oil on top of water.

        • ant56… it seems we are on the same page then… the Law is corrupt.

          And by “Law” I mean statutory law, not Common Law.

      • -a conversation following launch of First Astronomers

        Here is the sharing link to the recording of the book launch for The First Astronomers by Duane Hamacher including input from Ghillar and TSI Elders:

        Bringing a different cultural perspective a different world view–great wisdom

        • Thanks Diane, my net is on a slow redundant channel so only 8 minutes of the first link you embedded. At some point I need to “chat” with Uncle Ghillar to see if I can resolve my trespass. A close nation to my country that I have enjoyed. He would know the protocols I need to follow locally to attempt this.
          You can’t just tell the custodian that your squatting and how do you share in that because your only going to go squat on another nation. Would show no respect for either.
          The sky is fantastic here given the pollution and geo. Not like sitting in a hot artesian pool in freezing winter but nice.

          k

          • Simon I’m sure by acknowledging you need to —you can do–yes he would know the protocols and I’m sure would welcome you and acknowledge you and respect you

  7. The whole Covid narrative is based on a false premise.

    “We’ll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false” CIA Director William Casey

    “The fact remains, no one has isolated, purified, and characterized the virus. Therefore, it is not available from anywhere. Sorry!”

    Buyer Beware!

    Published on January 15, 2022

    https://principia-scientific.com/buyer-beware/

    https://bioanalyticx.com/virus-naughty-pictures/

    See more here: bioanalyticx.com

    https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2020/08/13/cia-sponsored-propaganda-has-been-around-for-75-years/

    The Covid-19 Pandemic Does Not Exist
    Part I

    https://www.globalresearch.ca/the-covid-19-pandemic-does-not-exist/5760903

  12. Re Maetowo Jerusalema… zombies dancing to the music, missing the entire point of the African message… become the music, live the music, be the music. View the original versions, kids and adults, to get the point. Life is for living, not going through the motions as a vague and aenemic simile.

    This desecration of African music happens every time it is introduced to the West, or the East for that matter. Little Richard got diluted by Chubby Checker; Carlos Santana got diluted by the record companies. The Christian Churches were so horrified by the “Satanic invasion of Rock” that they bribed and blackmailed the DJs of 1950s radio stations to not play anything “black” and it was not until the Rollingstones and Beatles revived black music with a talent that could not be repressed, that Rock and Blues were returned to us.

    Even then if it were not for the pirate radio stations, this too would have been repressed.

    EMI and others responded with Punk, to kill rock and drive black music from the airways. But, Reggae sneaked it back in from the English Ghettoes. And so on it went, soul-expressive music always under attack. Why? Because the Rockefeller’s Trilateral Commission realised the power it has to become the march and banner of rebellion and the fight for freedom. It happened in the 1920s, supporting womens equality and the right to smoke and vote. The 1950s, and the rebellion against the Grey Society, in which repression and hypocrisy ruled the community. It emerged in 1964 and was immediately stolen from the pathetic folk music community and adopted by Rock.

    Music is not an adjunct to living, it is the pulse of life; but only Africa managed to make us move in a way that cannnot be constrained. And so it was that in the footsteps of Mirium McCaber, Jerusalema emerged and was immediately subjected to funded luke warm versions to flood our consciousness.

    Don’t get sucked in. Watch and listen to the originals and get the message. Music will once again become the march and banner that enables us to defeat the globalists. Jerusalema was just the beginning, coming from an Africa that has not yet been defeated by the Globalists.

    • Santana wasn’t just diluted, he was put through a sausage machine
      EMI subverted punk by dilution but look at the most famous punk lyrics of all time
      ( Thatcher era 3 million unemployed ) in today’s context:
      “God save the queen
      The fascist regime
      They made you a moron …
      And our figurehead
      Is not what she seems
      Oh God save history
      God save your mad parade
      Oh Lord God have mercy
      All crimes are paid
      Oh when there’s no future
      How can there be sin
      We’re the flowers
      In the dustbin
      We’re the poison
      In your human machine
      We’re the future
      Your future
      God save the queen
      We mean it man
      We love our queen
      God saves
      God save the queen
      We mean it man
      There’s no future
      In England’s dreaming God save the queen
      No future
      No future
      No future for you
      Someone obviously laid things out for Johnny Rotten from a young age”

      Now he is only noted for calling out Jimmy Savile in the 70’s (no-one else did)

  13. I nominate the attached story for this week/month Wallace award

    https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-03-19/russian-astronauts-iss-ukraine-flag-cosmonauts/100923800

    Propose a Sunday,the proposal should be a current angle into nonsense world. The idea from the Darwin awards, Wallace was a Darwin protagonist, just as full of nonsense or nonsense on nonsense. Comment replies can throw it around per the subject interest Anything goes, even defending the target nomination, hidden satire, misinformation or pull the scab of it. A meta-story, to war-game or disseminate intent, motive technique and reexamine stories past.

    Can’t get blood out of stone but you can get gold out of rocks. People are noticing connections of a tedious nature now. Show respect for the article, let it run its course. Try for a nominee of a obvious connection, though not criteria. The Austin Fitts type page is perfect.

    https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-03-19/nurse-loses-fight-against-sa-covid19-vaccine-mandate/100923840
    fits the article, the idea of parliament debating and approving an act of violence, is ridiculous because they have and would. What stories got us here and still running strong award worthy.

    • “The South Australian Employment Tribunal action brought by nurse Joanne Teague claimed her employer — the state government — changed her terms of employment unlawfully,”
      https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-03-19/nurse-loses-fight-against-sa-covid19-vaccine-mandate/100923840

      So far so good, but then instead of simply stating that ” Ms Teague, who worked at the Royal Adelaide Hospital,became aware of said alleged breach on October 7 last year”

      The same report proceeds to insinuate that SHE breached something or other:
      “Ms Teague, who worked at the Royal Adelaide Hospital, was informed of the vaccination requirement on October 7 last year but refused to get vaccinated by November 1.”

      But I guess we can all take heart in the fact that any entity that’s incapable of making a dispassionate logical deduction is dead meat.

      • The gibber continues:
        “SA Health, through the Crown Solicitor’s Office, said it did not alter the terms and conditions of her employment since it was just following a direction under the state’s Emergency Management Act.Tribunal deputy president Stephen Lieschke agreed, saying that ‘The respondent [SA Health] is doing no more than respecting and applying the law, in the form of the Emergency Management Act direction.’ ”

        So here’s the section of said Act that purportedly supports that edict:

        EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT ACT 2004
        25 Powers of State Co-ordinator and authorised officers

        (1) On the declaration of an identified major incident, a major emergency or a disaster under Division 3, and while that declaration remains in force, the State Co-ordinator must take any necessary action to implement the SEMP and cause such response and recovery operations to be carried out as he or she thinks appropriate.

        (2) Without limiting or derogating from the operation of subsection (1) , but subject to the regulations, the State Co-ordinator or an authorised officer may, if of the opinion that it is necessary to do so, do or cause to be done all or any of the following things:

        (a) enter and, if necessary, break into any land, building, structure or vehicle (using such force as is necessary);

        (b) take possession of, protect or assume control over any land, body of water, building, structure, vehicle or other thing;

        (ba) remove or destroy, or order the removal or destruction of, any building, structure, vehicle, vegetation, animal or other thing;

        (bb) carry out, or cause to be carried out, excavation or other earthworks;

        (c) construct, or cause to be constructed, barriers, buildings or other structures;

        (ca) subject a place or thing to a decontamination procedure;

        (d) direct the owner of, or the person for the time being in charge of, any real or personal property to place it under the control or at the disposition of a specified person;

        (e) remove, or cause to be removed, to such place as the State Co-ordinator or authorised officer thinks fit, any person or animal, or direct the evacuation or removal of any person or animal;

        (f) direct or prohibit the movement of persons, animals or vehicles;

        (fa) direct a person to submit to a decontamination procedure;

        (fb) direct a person to remain isolated or segregated from other persons or to take other measures to prevent the transmission of a disease or condition to other persons;

        (fc) direct a person to undergo medical observation, examination (including diagnostic procedures) or treatment (including preventative treatment);

        (g) remove flammable material or any other hazardous material or cause flammable material or any other hazardous material to be removed from any place, building or structure;

        (h) cause any supply of fuel or other flammable liquid, any gas or electricity or any other hazardous material to be connected, reconnected, disconnected or shut off;

        (i) direct a person who is in a position to do so—

        (i) to stop any work or operation; or

        (ii) to close any premises or other place; or

        (iii) to contain the escape of any hazardous material, or to nullify the effects of the escape of any hazardous material; or

        (iv) to shut off or remove any plant, equipment, apparatus or device or to perform any operation in relation to any plant, equipment, apparatus or device;

        (j) connect, disconnect, reconnect, shut off or cut off the supply of water or any drainage facility;

        (k) make use of the gratuitous services of any person;

        (ka) require a person to furnish such information as may be reasonably required in the circumstances (other than information that may be required to be furnished under section 6 of the Essential Services Act 1981 );

        (l) remove to such place as he or she thinks fit any person who obstructs or threatens to obstruct response or recovery operations;

        (m) direct, insofar as may be reasonably necessary in the circumstances, any person (other than a control agency or other person referred to in paragraph (n) ) to assist in the exercise of any power under this section;

        (n) in the case of a major emergency or disaster—give directions to any control agency or person whose responsibilities require him or her to engage in response or recovery operations, or who is so engaged;

        (o) exercise any prescribed power.

        (3) In addition, if, after considering the advice of the Chief Public Health Officer, the State Co‑ordinator is of the opinion that the scope of an emergency is of such a magnitude that demand for medical goods or services cannot be met without contravening the laws of the State, the State Co‑ordinator may, despite those laws, authorise authorised officers, or authorised officers of a particular class, to provide, or direct the provision of, such goods or services or a particular class of such goods or services on such conditions as the State Co‑ordinator thinks appropriate."

        So where’s the bit about making employment subject to vaccination ?

        • In the pending Judicial Review in SA against the establishment of the emergency declaration by Commissioner Stevens and Pfizer-funded Spurious, Crown are currently in the process of intimidating and bullying not only the applicants but also the judge.
          In chambers this morning Crown sought that the trial be further adjourned to 5 April on some spurious grounds that someone in their legal team is a “close contact.”
          The matter was already adjourned for 10 days and is supposed to start this Wednesday. As a side strategy, SAPOL have ordered one of the applicants to return to work (with a RAT and a mask) or be disciplined, now that the vaccine mandate has been lifted. These are clearly the actions of a party who is not confident in the strength of their case. This ties in with the statements of people including Alex Antic noting that the evidence for the emergency declaration released to the court under discovery was parsimonious and certainly did not justify any kind of emergency. Indeed Professor Petrovsky has apparently eviscerated their case on the lack of scientific or medical evidence.
          Crown are also putting pressure on the judge to dismiss the matter if the emergency measures are discontinued (which they are keeping up their sleeve).
          There is a policy within government that in legal matters Crown must be the “model litigant” – ergo they must not use their position of power and unlimited finances to bully, intimidate or act in vexatious ways towards applicants who do not have such fortunate powers. They are clearly in breach of their own policy and are acting like a bunch of out of control goons. It’s not right.

      • Sorry, I was a bit vague, trying to truncate. Imagine me on twitter(won’t find me there or any).
        Imagined a team building exercise aiming at fake history begetting to mainstream accepted history today.
        If we can’t sort ourselves out there is zero chance of our collective work exiting the echo chamber.
        No secret my views that they are all in this together and have been for at least all modern wars, but that does not matter. We all know that something is not right and a path to engage self driven inspection is needed to help the awakening go through the process(crawl,walk,run,sprint) only self can break the MK, our work then available to quicken. Then we become decentralized, thwarting the plan.
        Wargaming ourselves to find a way to disseminate more widely and to sharpen ourselves to the “plays” that brought us to this point. But fun and a break from the heavy state, but still productive. We are all here working to the same goal.

        Good points Berry, but that’s the heavy state. We know but how did it get here and how can we get action(natural human-not current) on the wider dissonance.
        Anywho, all good, I’ll keep looking.

          • Thanks, Fair Dinkum.

            It appears that a stream of human consciousness flows parallel to, but distant from, my own and that I am excluded from its logic or any sense of continuity with prevailing conditions… for which I will be eternally grateful.

    • Its a game, to continue the split. I’ve seen the pictures and they are real, but so what, nothing we didn’t know. The alleged emails I have not seen or Hillary’s
      But
      FBI not destroying it.
      Rudy Giuliani, well
      Computer guy is adjusting his story that is still riddled with holes but just digs his hole deeper, now we find out his father and uncle are military colonel’s.That rank is the most senior field-grade military officer.

      Now confirmed by NY Post – owner Rupert Murdoch

      You can’t split “them” because they are one and the same

  21. The TV just said “Get your child va666inated, it’s all free and all va666ines have been thoroughly tested” – message from Australian Government.
    What does thoroughly tested mean now, 99% survival rate ?

  22. In the pending Judicial Review in SA against the establishment of the emergency declaration by Commissioner Stevens and Pfizer-funded Spurious, Crown are currently in the process of intimidating and bullying not only the applicants but also the judge.
    In chambers this morning Crown sought that the trial be further adjourned to 5 April on some spurious grounds that someone in their legal team is a “close contact.”
    The matter was already adjourned for 10 days and is supposed to start this Wednesday. As a side strategy, SAPOL have ordered one of the applicants to return to work (with a RAT and a mask) or be disciplined, now that the vaccine mandate has been lifted. These are clearly the actions of a party who is not confident in the strength of their case. This ties in with the statements of people including Alex Antic noting that the evidence for the emergency declaration released to the court under discovery was parsimonious and certainly did not justify any kind of emergency. Indeed Professor Petrovsky has apparently eviscerated their case on the lack of scientific or medical evidence.
    Crown are also putting pressure on the judge to dismiss the matter if the emergency measures are discontinued (which they are keeping up their sleeve).
    There is a policy within government that in legal matters Crown must be the “model litigant” – ergo they must not use their position of power and unlimited finances to bully, intimidate or act in vexatious ways towards applicants who do not have such fortunate powers. They are clearly in breach of their own policy and are acting like a bunch of out of control goons. It’s not right.

C'mon Leave a Reply, Debate and Add to the Discussion

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.