by Dee McLaughing
Oh boy, hasn’t the life of a patsy become tedious?
Today, I’ll take a look at the crazy parallels between two of the FBI’s highest-profile investigations: the alleged Boston Marathon bomber, Dzhokhar (“Jahar”) and the alleged Charlie Kirk shooter, Tyler Robinson. Different crimes, different eras, some striking similarities and the same FBI.
The Bomber(s) narrative:
Dzhokhar (“Jahar”) Tsarnaev and his older brother, Tamerlan Tsarnaev, were identified by the FBI as the perpetrators of the 2013 Boston Marathon bombing. The brothers planted two homemade pressure-cooker bombs near the marathon finish line, killing three people and injuring more than 260 others.
The Shooter narrative:
Tyler James Robinson, a 22-year-old electrical apprentice from Utah, is accused of fatally shooting conservative commentator Charlie Kirk with a 30.06 rifle during a public event at Utah Valley University on 10 September 2025. (An absolutely impossible scenario.)
Some of the magical comparisons:
1. FBI begging the Public
In both investigations, the FBI released surveillance images asking the public to identify the suspect(s) — who they knew already.
Tamerlan Tsarnaev was known to the FBI, yet they desperately wanted to identify him.
As for Tyler, he had already been mirandized at 6.30pm when the FBI at 8:00pm put new CCTV footage up begging for the public’s help to identify Tyler (who was already in custody).
2. Family involvement
In both cases, family members became significant to the investigation, although in slightly different ways. Tyler’s parents assisted in helping Tyler survive by arranging his surrender.
3. Confessions
For Tyler, investigators have described his Discord messages (his confession to “my love” and others) as proof of guilt. Around 6.30pm on the 11th of September the police confiscated his phone, but the main confession was only posted between 7 and 8pm.
For Jahar, he confessed by scribbling on the boat.
4. Extensive forensic evidence
The FBI, of course, relied heavily on forensic science in both investigations. In Tyler’s case, they claim to have DNA from a towel wrapped around the alleged rifle and the screwdriver. In the Boston Marathon case, forensic work included explosive residue, bomb fragments, fingerprints, DNA, ballistics, yawn, etc.
The FBI posted a random photo presenting it as the “gun”.
And of course, Jahar’s backpack was not carrying the bomb. CCTV footage identified that the Craft service guy was carrying the “Pot calling the kettle black” bomb.
5. Large public information campaigns
In both investigations the FBI had continual press conferences requesting public assistance.
6. The Want for Dairy
Immediately after bombing or assassinating the patsies went off for dairy.
After he allegedly shot Kirk, Tyler went off to Dairy Queen.
And after Jahar and Tamalan allegedly bombed the marathon, they went off to buy milk; wrong milk and exchange milk. My video from years back.
7. Demolishing the Crime Scene.
Here I will compare the Port Arthur massacre (demolishing Broad Arrow cafe – the site of the shooting) to paving over the Kirk “shooting” site.
Similarities
- The Boston Marathon bombing involved multiple explosive devices, numerous fatalities and injuries, and an alleged (fake) international terrorism investigation.
- The Charlie Kirk case involved one miniature explosive device — killing just Kirk, and NO investigation.
In both cases the patsies were to be killed. Tyler was going to be involved in a “shoot out”, but he avoided this fate by handing himself in early. Jahar was in the boat when authorities fired off 240 bullets. He somehow survived.
In both cases the FBI were “involved.”
I am not going to waste my time with normies to endorse 95% of Dee’s report ( 100% actually but I leave 5% ‘wiggle room’ for any slight corrections) and explain the obvious aspects that explain that officialdom murders innocent people and blame it on some patsy to cover for officialdom’s mass murders.
Just remember the 911 Commission report that was mostly lies, official deception and obvious unscientific BS .
If normies have not woken up to decades of official crack, nothing I can add to Dee’s article will wake up gullible fools who believe governments and lying fake mass media. THEY ARE COMPLICIT IN SO MANY KILLINGS.
As an example look up the GuLF OF TONKIN LIES THAT GOT ABOUT 450 of our boys killed and about 54,000 us boys killed.
Of course who gives a stuff about the million or so Vientnamese…….. now you can have cheap holiday there!
1017
Mary Maxwell LLB, I explained for many comments and explained the photos of THE REAL BOMBERS, but you always did not tie up (0r shoe ALL THE EVIDENCE AVAILABLE) all the photos at WRH, showing who did it. You kept missing the same back pack on a culprit matching the ruined back pack white tag.
Now why did you keep ignoring the connection to the fellows with black jackets and tan trousers.
Now who do you really suspect where the uniformed bombers came from?💁🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️
Why did you expose the evidence for you ‘client’
207
Correct;
“………’NOT’ EXPOSE THE AVAILABLE…….
213
Dee, regarding the FBI. the book by Trevor Aaronson gets little coverage but it’s a gem:
I have a case in Appeals Court, Boson, at the moment, so this is a coincidence: For my “Exhibit C” In the case (Maxwell v Trump), I quotes Trevor Aaronsn’s 2013 book “Manufactured Terrorism” as follows:
“After 9/11, the FBI was tasked with recruiting a great number of informants who could check on the lives of Muslims. As a private researcher I became interested in “Muslim terrorism.” My statistics show that in the ten years following 9/11, the FBI and Department of Justice indicted and convicted more that 150 people via sting operations. If these, the FBI not only led 50 of the terrorist plots but also provided all the necessary weapons, money, and transportation.
The justification? By catching a lone wolf before he strikes, federal law enforcement can take hi off the streets before he meets a real terrorist who can provide him with weapons. However, to this day, no example exists of a lone wolf who, unable by himself to launch an attack, met a terrorist and became operational. Granted, an Afghan-American named Najibullah Zazi, came close to attacking the NY subway in 2009, with a plan to place backpack bombs on crowded trains but he had international connections and the ability to carry out the work on his own.
When Obama became president in 2009 he used many sting operations. In three years, his DoJ prosecuted 75 terrorism sting targets. Obama embraced national security as a tenet of his office. He also engaged US military resources in the ouster of Libya’s Gaddafi, and conducted secret wars in Yemen and Somalia. The FBI has become effective in creating the enemy it is hitting.
If the Fort Dix Five, as the media later dubbed them, were terrorists, they were coerced ones – pushed along by criminals who had personal interests in their prosecution. (I know of a case where the informant got $100,00.) Dritan Duka said that in the aftermath of 9/11, Muslims could be arrested just for talking. Bakalli asked the Duka cousins wat jihad meant. It didn’t mean violence, they told him, it was a personal struggle against oneself and a struggle to lead a good life. Soon, the FBI arrested the 5 men and charged them with attempted murder and conspiracy.
The key to conviction was that the prosecution did not have to prove that the Fort Dix Five would do the murder, just that they talked about it. This is the crime of conspiracy. In closing, US Attorney Fitzpatrick told the jury “We don’t have to prove that they intended to kill.”
This goes against the landmark case Brandenburg v Ohio (1969). Clarence Brandenburg, a Ku Klux Klansman, had given an inflammatory speech in 1964. He was prosecuted under an Ohio law of 1919 that prohibited advocating “unlawful methods of terrorism.” He appealed his conviction to the US Supreme Court where it was overturned – as the government cannot punish speech unless it is intended and likely to result in imminent lawless action.
Mehenna’s case is connected to this. Actually, the way prosecutors got around Brandenburg was by saying that Mehanna’s advocacy of Al Qaeda and violence provided ‘material support” to the terrorist organization which is against one of the new laws.
At his sentencing in 2012, Mehanna addressed US District Judge George A O’Toole, saying that he was the victim of a vengeful prosecution for his refusal to be an FBI informant. “I have spent the majority of four years in a solitary cell, the size of a closet, locked down for 23 hours each day.” Judge O’Toole, unmoved by Mehanna’s statement, sentenced the 29-year-old to seventeen years in prison.
[I rest my case.]
Rested. Excellent
If anyone cares listen to the report update via Judy Byington.
Per e-mails as known ISIS WAS a CREATED ‘TERRORIST ’ organisation.
Also Covid injections were concocted targeting the Caucasian and Negro populations… per Charlie Ward and not other selected ‘races’
It is going to be heaps of fun as it is all exposed.
Seems the genocidal ‘ DEAGEL’ was/is fairdinkum. I noted that report in about 20i5 and what races were to be reduced
AUSTRALIA WAS REPORTED TO BE REDUCED BY ABOUT FIVE MILLION.
Strange💁🤷♂️ seems that our politicians and fake mass media did not notice or read it.
537
NORMIES.
You lot are really, pathetic, seriously gullible, trusting and stupid……
5-43