Home Corona A List of Covid-related Crimes, and Sue Grey’s Letter to NZ Ministers...

A List of Covid-related Crimes, and Sue Grey’s Letter to NZ Ministers about Jab-As-Homicide

33

by Mary W Maxwell, LLB

It’s about time someone raised the matter of criminality on the part of government officials. Sue Grey is a lawyer in New Zealand who has written to several Ministers with a veiled threat as follows:

“Dear [Ministers],

I attach below some new and very important research which I must assume your advisors have not yet provided to you, or the experimental Pfizer injection rollout would surely already have been suspended. It is now clearly established that the SProtein is a toxin that causes the harmful symptoms known as “Covid”.

I surely don’t need to explain the legal, ethical and human rights consequences of a government knowingly promoting a program which intentionally injects a life threatening toxin into healthy people. I also attach a report indicating that injected nanoparticles (and the SProtein) do not remain in the arm muscle but instead circulate throughout the whole body.”

Attorney Sue Grey also has a degree in microbiology. She is therefore able to throw her weight around when talking about the Covid vaccines.  However, all lawyers, even ones who do not know what an “s-protein” is, must be aware of the accountability of persons, including doctors and nurses, who give a lethal jab.

In this article, I’ll go far beyond the two charges Ms Grey suggests, namely homicide (if a person dies from the vax) and assault (if they don’t die but are injured). What about fraud, genocide, treason, abuse of power, racketeering, profiteering, etc?

Allow me to cite some relevant American laws, both state and federal. Most of these subjects are found in Australian law also, with the exception of genocide (for which Australia depends on so-called International Law) and treason (which in Australia does not include the crucial concept of “levying war against the people”).

The Indictment-worthy Activities

Covid-related actions that are indictment-worthy, besides those for homicide and assault, include: untrue statements by government, busines, and media; the deliberate engendering of fear, the depriving of citizens of well-known cures (such a HCQ and ivermectin), the making of contracts between Pharma and government whose provisions anticipate violations of the Constitution, and so forth.

Then there is the whole matter of wrongly controlling the population by way of: mandates for testing, mandates for vax, lockdowns, travel restrictions, the issuing of fines when the legislature hasn’t criminalized the behavior, the requiring of vaccine passports (an obvious prelude to “social credit scoring”), mask mandates, temperature taking at entrance to public buildings, and so forth.

And there are deliberate knock-on effects of lockdowns and mandates: children losing education, small businesses collapsing, people going hungry, citizens being arrested for protesting, workers losing their livelihood for refusing to be vaccinated, and so forth. (Some say the vaccines and lockdowns are making us lose our natural build-up of immunity, but I do not feel qualified to evaluate that.)

Note: It is often thought that government officials are immune to criminal charge. No, they are never immune. I repeat, a government official has no immunity. Whether you be a government clerk, or the president of the United States, you are not above the law. In regard to civil liability, you may be immune from being sued for decisions you make as a legislator or a judge, and there are others whom a particular statute may protect, but if you commit a crime, you do the time. (In Australia, there is one exception: the king can do no wrong.)

Covid Crimes in the US — A Tentative List

I feel certain that the entire Covid thing (well documented by the Rockefeller Foundation in its 2014 publication) has nothing to do with a “novel virus,” but is an attempt to change our political arrangement to tyranny, and that the lockdown and vaccinations are depopulation efforts.

In that vein, I suspect that all of the following crimes are being committed in relation to Covid: homicide, assault, treason, giving false statements, genocide, development of bioweaponry, bribery, false claims (financial fraud), incitement of violence, and racketeering. Black-letter law criminalizes all of those things.

I am not in a position to prosecute anyone (at the moment), so I will not name the suspects, except Dr Anthony Fauci. Rather, I will quote the law, using federal law as expressed in Title 18 of the United States Code, or state law, e.g., that expressed in the MGL — Massachusetts General Law.

Homicide.  Homicide is of course a common law crime, as old as the Bible. In the MGL it’s at Chapter 265 section 1:

“Murder committed with deliberately premeditated malice aforethought, or with extreme atrocity or cruelty, … is murder in the first degree. Murder which does not appear to be in the first degree is murder in the second degree. The degree of murder shall be found by the jury.”

Assault.  I am thinking here of the assault of injecting someone with a harmful substance, but also the assault of filling people with fear by spreading panic stories. Here is MGL (Massachusetts General Law), Part IV, Title I, Chapter 265, section 13A:

(a) “Whoever commits an assault … upon another shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than 2.5 years in a house of correction or by a fine of not more than $1,000.”

Treason. In Mother England, persons could be charged with the crime of treason merely for insulting the king.  When the US Constitution was being written in 1787, the Framers took care to eliminate that kind of nonsense, so they wrote a strict definition in Article III, section 3:

“Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.”

Congress later codified that at 18 USC 2381:

“Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them … is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined….”

“Levying war” does not have to mean soldiers in uniform; it means attempting to kill “the people” by any means. Treason violates state law, too; MGL Chapter 264, section 6 says:

“Whoever commits treason against the Commonwealth shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for life.”

Giving False Statements. This is a federal crime and “little guys” often get punished for it, such as for lying to the FBI. Per 18 USC 1001:

“(a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, whoever … knowingly and willfully—(1) falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact; (2) makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or (3) makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry; shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years….”

Senator Rand Paul, at a July 2021 Senate hearing, accused Dr Fauci of lying to Congress. (More on that below.)

Genocide.  Do not look to international treaties, if you are American: we have the following as domestic law at 18 USC 1091:

“Genocide: (a) Basic Offense — Whoever, whether in time of peace or in time of war and with the specific intent to destroy, in whole or in substantial part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group as such — (1) kills members of that group; (2) causes serious bodily injury to members of that group;… (4) subjects the group to conditions of life that are intended to cause the physical destruction of the group in whole or in part….

(b) Punishment for Basic Offense (1) in the case of an offense under subsection (a)(1), where death results, by death or imprisonment for life … (2) a fine of not more than $1,000,000 or imprisonment for not more than 20 years, or both, in any other case. (e) There is jurisdiction … if the offense is committed in whole or in part within the United States; or (2) where the alleged offender is— (A) a national of the United States …. “

Possession of a Bioweapon. Senator Rand Paul accused Dr Fauci of engaging in Gain-of-Function research. The function that is gained is the function of making a virus more virulent, and/or making it easier to jump from animal to man. In his capacity as Director of National Institute for Health on Infectious Diseases, Fauci funded that research in a lab in China, even though Congress had ordered him not to. The crime of developing bioweapons is codified at 8 USC 175:

“(a) Whoever knowingly develops, produces, stockpiles, transfers, acquires, retains, or possesses any biological agent, toxin, or delivery system for use as a weapon, or knowingly assists a foreign state or any organization to do so, or attempts, threatens, or conspires to do the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for life or any term of years, or both.

“(b) Whoever knowingly possesses any biological agent, toxin, [etc] that … is not reasonably justified by … peaceful purpose, shall be fined … imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both.”

Fraud. There is massive fraud going on in the hugely expensive effort to “fight Covid.” This includes paying over a billion dollars to vaccine manufacturers to get a product ready for market in 2020. (Why would they need help?) There is also the fraud involved in “testing” people for Covid, using a method — the pcr, Polymerase chain reaction test — that is not suitable for diagnosis. Per 18 USC 371:

“If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.”

Making False Claims.  This crime was legislated in such a way as to that allow citizens to file qui tam suits (“on behalf of the nation”) where money coming from the public trough ends up in the wrong hands. How about the ridiculous payment of $39,000 to a hospital for each patient that it put on a ventilator?  Per 31 USC 3729:

“(1)In general.—Subject to paragraph (2), any person who—(A) knowingly presents, or causes to be presented, a false or fraudulent claim for payment or approval; (B) knowingly makes, uses, or causes to be made or used, a false record or statement material to a false or fraudulent claim; (C) conspires to commit a violation of subparagraph (A), (B), (D), (E), (F), or (G) … is liable to the United States Government for a civil penalty … plus 3 times the amount of damages which the Government sustains because of the act of that person.”

Obstruction of Justice. More generally, it is felonious to wrongly influence any branch of government.  Per 18 USC 1503:

“(a) Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication, endeavors to influence, intimidate, or impede any …officer in… any court of the United States … or… obstructs … the due administration of justice, shall be punished…[by] imprisonment for not more than 10 years, a fine under this title, or both.”

Incitement. We have heard that Monia Smit was arrested for protesting in Australia, with the crime being specified as “incitement.” I am sure that crime could be turned around — the government is inciting people to violence, is it not? Per MGL, Chapter 264 section 11:

“Whoever by speech or by exhibition, distribution or promulgation of any written or printed document, paper or pictorial representation advocates, advises, counsels or incites assault upon any public official, or the killing of any person, or the unlawful destruction of real or personal property… shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for not more than three years… or by a fine of not more than one thousand dollars.”

Racketeering. If ever there was a racket, it is Covid. In 1970, law professor Robert Blakely drafted, and Congress enacted, a law designed to capture those who are heard to capture thanks to the complexity of their operations.  This is the RICO Act — Racketeer-Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act. I will quote only a bit of it from 18 USC 1961:

(1) “racketeering activity” means (A) any act or threat … (B) any act which is indictable under any of the following provisions of title 18, United States Code: Section 201 (relating to bribery), section 659 (relating to theft from interstate shipment) if the act indictable under section 659 is felonious, section 664 (relating to embezzlement from pension and welfare funds), sections 891–894 (relating to extortionate credit transactions), section 1028 (relating to fraud and related activity in connection with identification documents), …

section 1503 (relating to obstruction of justice), section 1510 (relating to obstruction of criminal investigations), section 1511 (relating to the obstruction State or local law enforcement), section 1512 (relating to tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant sections 1581–1592 (relating to peonage, slavery, and trafficking in person, section 1958 (relating to use of interstate commerce facilities in the commission of murder-for-hire), section 1960 (relating to illegal money transmitters), sections 2251, 2251A, 2252, and 2260 (relating to sexual exploitation of children),… sections 175–178 (relating to biological weapons)…”

The original intent of RICO was for the Department of Justice to prosecute on that basis, but it rarely does so.  The task is to identify an “enterprise” and show that the defendants have committed two relevant crimes (even mail fraud qualifies) within a ten-year period.  Covid defendants could be, say, the FDA and the NY Times.

(Note: Citizens can file a RICO suit if they suffer an economic loss. I sued the FBI and the Boston Globe under RICO for acts related to the Boston Marathon bombing.)

Do NOT be dissuaded by a lack of technical skill in the fine points.  Consider the maxim: Apices juris non sunt jura — “the niceties of the law are not the law.” Covid is a scam and vaccinated people are being murdered. This is an emergency.

I mentioned New Zealander lawyer Sue Grey writing to the Ministers. Her penultimate paragraph says, concisely: “Please put aside your pride and the dogma, and suspend this program.”

Yes, a first step is to make this thing stop happening. Some arrests may be the sharpest way to do this.

A worry is that there may not be enough prisons to hold the miscreants. I hear that Adelaide has just cancelled the Royal Show, due to Covid.  Perhaps the Showgrounds could be used for public trials, with the stables modified to hold the accused(s).

Please get with it. Things are upside down.  You can turn them right-side up. Yes, YOU CAN DO THIS.

 

SHARE

33 COMMENTS

  1. I find it heartening that lawyers around the world are becoming mobile. To these lawyer/ attorneys I say do not dally. The lives of innocents, even if brain dead are being sacrificed for the benefit of greed and power for politicians and public servants, police commanders, doctors, hospitals, the pharmaceutical and health industries.

  2. Very good photos, Dee. The color orange can be sooo reassuring.

    As for the one on the left, I mistakenly thought you meant that the CDC was running a prison. Now I see you mean the CDC is the prisonee.

    Or as Fair Dinkum would say, the gaolee.

    However, I sadly heard from Adelaide today that the gov’t has ANNOUNCED that as of November we will have “welcome camps.”

    I now begin to think that the ushers who will usher us thereto are the persons who enter every night to Sydney airport on planes from Who Knoweth Where.

    • I did notice in a previous writing of yours recently you used the word “gaoled” – i was planning on saying how pleased i was but must have got distracted by something else.

      both thumbs up! 🙂

      • When I first started writing for Gumshoe, circa 2014, I spelled the word “organized.” Fair Dinkum yelled “FFS, Its organiSed.”

        I apologized and said I was brought up that way in Seppoland.

        Fair replied also with an apology, and said it was OK for Visiting Dignitaries (not his exact words). We have been friends ever since.

  4. Using children for medical experiments in Australia including vaccines is nothing new –

    Some people may find content on this website distressing. Read more
    Victoria – Event
    Medical experiments (c. 1945 – c. 1970)
    Summary Records Photos Full page

    During the twentieth century, babies and children in Victorian orphanages and Homes were used as subjects for medical experiments. Reports from the Senate Inquiry into Children in Institutional Care contained details of studies carried out by the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute and the Commonwealth Serum Laboratory (CSL) between 1945 and 1970. One reason given for the use of children in institutions in medical trials was that this group of children was particularly vulnerable to epidemics. Journalists at the Age newspaper investigated these experiments in 1997. A report written by the Department of Human Services in November 1997 considered the issue of who had given consent for these children’s participation in the medical trials. The report found that ‘it is likely that the research institutes gained consent to conduct the research from staff responsible for the institutions and possibly in one case, from a Departmental employee’.

    Medical experiments on ‘orphans’ in institutions are discussed in the ‘Forgotten Australians’ report (2004) and ‘Protecting Vulnerable Children’ (2005). Australian research institutes (including the Water and Eliza Hall Institute and CSL) trialled new vaccines on babies and children in Victorian Homes, particularly during the period after World War Two.

    Trials of a herpes simplex vaccine were carried out on babies at the St Joseph’s Foundling Hospital in Broadmeadows in the 1940s and the results were published in the Medical Journal of Australia and the Australian Journal of Experimental Biology and Medical Science.

    The Medical Journal of Australia also reported on experiments with influenza vaccines conducted by the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute in the 1950s, on children under the age of 3 at Broadmeadows.

    CSL tested quadruple antigen vaccines on babies and young children between 1959 and 1961 at five Victorian institutions: St Joseph’s Foundling Hospital, Broadmeadows, the Foundling Hospital and Infants’ Home [Berry Street], East Melbourne, Bethany Babies’ Home, Geelong, Methodist Babies’ Home, South Yarra and Turana in Royal Park.

    In 1997, the Age published reports about medical experiments and research trials conducted on children in Victorian institutions in the 1950s and 1960s. The media attention led the Chairman of the National Health and Medical Research Council to comment that everyone involved in clinical research needed to ‘heed the lessons of the past’.

    In 2009, the Vice-Chancellor of the University of Melbourne strongly supported the Federal Government’s apology to child migrants and Forgotten Australians and in a statement, expressed

    its deep regret for the part played by researchers linked to its community in vaccination research trials conducted after World War II using children in orphanages as 'subjects'.

    https://www.findandconnect.gov. au/ref/vic/biogs/E000503b.htm?fbclid=IwAR1wO_TPA3M5ouLwltFlZ46B1b86UqzbJ-N62Ss6BQarG9vraPt6mmMA1p8

  5. Thank You Mary! People have been lacking confidence but the encouragement to stand up for ourselves is building strongly.
    Mark Latham offers easy help: https://t.me/realjoeljammal/120.
    Further down that thread: Craig Kelly and Tony from AFL solicitors running a case against the NSW Health Minister & CMO in NSW Supreme Court to obtain ruling to declare such vax mandates unlawful & in breach of Australian Constitution sect 51, the Nuremburg Code, the International Covenant & various other laws incl the Federal Bio Security Act. there are several points, but the main thing is be confident. to mandate a vax is illegal “rubbish” so calm down and take a deep breath.

  7. I’m really tired of blardy drongoes flogging “Americanism” as if it was the pinnacle of social order which should be exported and imposed on the whole World. To have “rights” defined by a secretive gang of revolutionaries, whether in North America or Central Europe (France, for example) is nothing but words on parchment for blardy lawyers to interpret and twist according to the demands of who’s paying or blackmailing.

    Most of what Americanist Mary cites above is well covered in the “Common Law” and the precepts “Thou shalt not kill, Thou shalt not bear false witness, Thou shalt not steal (including by usury and extortion etc.), Thou shalt not covet… ” Grievances of a Man (or group) against another should be judged by a competent, lawful agency (a jury of peers is common in neo-Christian society) under a transcendent moral authority… not the fatuous quibbles of mercenary “lawyers”.

    The much scoffed at by anthropocentric humanist revolutionaries Australian Constitution is not a pretence at arbitrary giving or taking “rights”; it is simply an agreed (by the Monarch and the people in referendum) of how the government of the self-governing colony should work with the means for the people to represent their concerns to the ultimate temporal responsibility.

    The ink wasn’t even put to paper when the secretive “enlightenment” revolutionaries and plutocrats set about conforming the proposed system to a Party dominated oligarchy. Americanism by stealth.

    Americanism is a self-destruct; what (democratic) Caesar giveth Caesar can taketh. It seems to me that the secretocracy wants to put more pressure on Aus because it is potentially much less malleable than the Yankified “enlightenment”.

  8. I do not concur with a few statements made by this man as you will see but overall it is a very informative read –

    Lawfully Enter Rebellion
    By steveadmin on Wednesday, May 16th, 2018 | Comments Off

    Breaking News The UK Government Is Bankrupt.

    Here are a few basic questions which everyone should know the correct answers too.

    What is legal?
    What is Lawful?
    Are Legal and Lawful the same?
    What is common law?

    What is LEGAL, the legal systems man made legislation, acts of parliament, statutes and rules (man made laws needing consent) coming from the UN because our sovereignty is treasonously being given away by the British government. It has been going on behind everyone’s backs for decades. There must be thousands and thousands of the man made laws which needs your consent to be governed in the first place. No Act or Statutes are above our UNALIENABLE RIGHTS.

    ……….. So the simple answer is DO NOT CONSENT, if you haven’t caused no one any harm or loss then there really is no crime being committed. The reason to use NO ONE is because those are the words used in Magna Charta 1215 Article 40 states To NO ONE will we sell, to NO ONE will we refuse or delay, right or justice…………..

    See for yourself below is our unalienable rights…………….

    http://steven-kirk.com/

    On 24th August 1215 the Pope declared the Magna Carta null and void.

    “…………Magna Carta – An Immediate Success…?

    No. Not in the slightest.

    Yes, King John agreed to the terms of Magna Carta, and yes, the barons renewed their oaths of allegiance to him. But the settlement did not last long. The security clause and the 25 barons of Magna Carta made it difficult for King John to wriggle out of the agreement as freely as he would have liked (for he had now given the royal seal of approval to a document that made him as susceptible to the law as any other ‘free man’), and he was much aggrieved by the manner in which Magna Carta had been enforced. And so he sought help from the Pope

    Pope Innocent III

    At the time, the pope was the official overlord of the kingdoms of England and Ireland. King John sent messengers to the Pope requesting that Magna Carta be annulled. In response, the barons did not give up the city of London, and vowed not to do so until the terms of the charter were implemented.

    Pope Innocent III saw the Magna Carta from the king’s perspective, however, and was indeed very alarmed by the charter’s terms. On 24th August 1215 the pope issued the papal bull, a document in which he describes Magna Carta as “illegal, unjust, harmful to royal rights and shameful to the English people”. The papal bull declared Magna Carta “null and void of all validity for ever”………………..”

    http://www.magnacartatranslation.com/about-us/magna-carta/

    By the terms of the “FOREVER” Treaty of 1213, the Vatican has since owned the Crown which it has rented to the British Monarchy per the terms of said Treaty, to wit:

    http://amazingdiscoveries.tv/media/123/211-the-secret-

    So all we have left as our law giver is Our Father Jesus Christ himself.

    • The easy way to read all this is that Trump doesn’t think he will get a good deal under the Rockerfellas – Bush/Scherff – Gates NWO, in fact he probably expects the Trump dynasty will get the “own nothing and be induced happy” treatment. Simple and clear case of self-interest.

  10. Our lying filth SBS TV is pushing mRNA miracle with Hungarian female hero (er, heroine) inventor.
    Hmm, Hungary huh. Aren’t all the discoveries normally STOLEN at some point. So?

    So, mRNA will now fix aids & cancer, used as a preparatory step before chemotherapy !!!
    Also to fix malaria !!! rendering cheap HCQ totally obsolete, according to the advertising material.
    You can see why we all need to be injected, probably monthly, forever !!!
    Side effects eg paralysis, stroke etc. should simply be dismissed as a secondary issue.

  11. I don’t recall any recent democratic govt ever using so much PR, coersion, fear-mongering and collusion with hopes of convincing the public of anything. MSM is not unbiased, and no longer educates, but are now part of the govt machine, trying to convince us that we know nothing.

    Critical thinking seems a foreign concept for many.

    Also, it seems the anger of many towards those who question, is because they now realise they’ve been duped.

  14. I heard something on the news yesterday ( took a while to process ) I think about an appeal failing in the federal court ? Can’t find anything new today but a couple of old stories. It would seem the owner of a publishing platform might be liable for defamation posted on the platform despite disclaimers to the opposite effect ? So a person motivated by malice could put a comment on the platform and have the platform owner / publisher dragged through court ? It fits well with the police state agenda to shut down the comments section of everything.
    In the Bangkok Post they delete all the comments frequently, in the stories relating to the virus plandemic. Some of the commenters seem to be shills for BIgPharma whether paid or not I can’t say. Comments on stories relating to the king are always disabled. It presumably always comes down to depth of pockets.

    https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/media-companies-liable-for-facebook-comments-made-by-others-court-finds-20190624-p520rf.html

  17. Craig Kelly is publishing the “vaccine” adverse events from TGA
    https://uap-media.com.au/tga-full-report-of-covid-vaccine-adverse-events-and-deaths/

    Note at the top
    Number of reports (cases) 46438
    Number of cases with a single suspected medicine 45778
    Number of cases where death was a reported outcome 448

    OK 45778 / 46438 = 0.986 or 98.6% were a single suspected medicine
    And 448 / 46438 = 0.0096 or 1% of cases were deaths (but could be higher than 1% of cases because “multiple adverse events have been reported for some patients”.

    I have done straight % calculations but you can see there is scope to fudge any amount away by playing with the numbers. The most famous fudge is the reports themselves, of which most go unreported.
    In many other countries you can see on the news they don’t wear the dust-masks, they don’t have bodies lying in the streets (except beggars sleeping), the drama seems to be almost entirely contained to &/or originated within THE MEDICAL SYSTEM !!!
    ($$$)

    • Craig Kelly is the kind of politician I want in a leadership position. ‘United Australian Party’, will be getting my vote and I haven’t even seen their positions on various issues.

      Perhaps this election there will less morons that ‘I always vote Labor/Liberal’. The plandemic has affected everyone and more people are now awake. As Kelly said, Liberal and Labor have both failed Australia.

      I predict that Dan and Gladys will be thrown out.

      A legitimate Royal Commission into this Plandemic is needed. Then afterwards there may be criminal charges brought against a heap of scum.

  18. Dicktator Dan from MKpedia
    Following his election to parliament in the Legislative Assembly seat of Mulgrave at the 2002 election, Andrews was appointed Parliamentary Secretary for Health.
    In 2007, Andrews became Minister for Health. In 2008, Andrews voted in favour of abortion law reform in Victoria. During the passing of the Abortion Law Reform Act 2008, Andrews sought counsel from senior church clergy who advised him that the act was contrary to Church teaching. Andrews replied that he “… did not intend to be a Catholic health minister”.
    Upon his election, Andrews fast-tracked Victoria’s ties with the PRC. Firstly, he led a group of prominent Victorians to China on his first overseas trip, and promised to send his entire cabinet there during his first term. His government signed a Memorandum of understanding (MoU) with the Chinese government under the Belt and Road Initiative in October 2018, but kept its details secret until he released it five weeks later. The MoU involves cooperation on facilities connectivity, unimpeded trade, finance, people-to-people bond[s], and the “Digital Silkroad”.
    In March 2018, the Ombudsman released a report stating that Victorian Labor had wrongly used $387,842 of staff budget entitlements during the election campaign, breaching guidelines for the use of electoral staff. The report identified 21 MPs (11 current MPs including six ministers) who had used the scheme. Andrews stated he was sorry the incidents had occurred, and that Labor had repaid the money.
    On 20 September 2017, the Voluntary Assisted Dying Bill 2017 was introduced by the Andrews Labor Government.
    In 2019, an independent tribunal granted Andrews an 11.8% salary increase, giving him a total salary of $441,000 and making him the highest-paid state premier in the country.
    Andrews is one of the few state politicians in Australia to have never spent a day on the backbench. He has spent his entire tenure in the Legislative Assembly as a junior minister (2002–2006), minister (2006–2010), opposition leader (2010–2014) and premier (2014–present).

    A tune from more optimistic times ( first prison state lockdown, early 2020 )

C'mon Leave a Reply, Debate and Add to the Discussion

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.