Home Corona After The World Got Injected Video and A Letter To The South...

After The World Got Injected Video and A Letter To The South Australian Premier

29

Editor’s note: A video (above) interviewing Prof Dolores Cahill and then Sucharit Bhakadi, followed by an email by Elizabeth Hart.

Letter by Elizabeth Hart

Vaccination is political…

‘Our elected representatives’ are being manipulated to impose highly questionable and lucrative medical interventions on the community, e.g. Covid ‘leaky vaccines’ and flu jabs. These medical interventions are being mandated for millions of people in a variety of circumstances.

Who is actually behind the push for the never-ending stream of ‘vaccine’ products…? We really need to get to the bottom of this.

In the meantime, please see below my email to South Australian premier Peter Malinauskas, questioning the evidence for ‘free’ Covid jabs and flu jabs, and raising the subject of natural immunity, a matter I brought to the attention of Peter Malinauskas in March 2020, when I forwarded him my BMJ rapid response: Is it ethical to impede access to natural immunity? The case of SARS-CoV2.

There’s a lot to look back on now to consider the grossly disproportionate and ill-targeted global Covid-19 response.

For example, who drove the plan to inject the entire global population with Covid ‘leaky vaccines’ over and over again…against a disease it was known from the beginning wasn’t a serious threat to most people? 

Where were the doctors? Why didn’t they challenge this INSANE plan to jab the entire population?

Time to track this back now… 

Please see my email to Peter Malinauskas below. This email is also publicly accessible via this link, please feel free to share: https://bit.ly/3NumNA0

THE EMAIL

For the attention of: Peter Malinauskas

Leader of the SA Labor Party, Premier of South Australia

Peter Malinauskas, re the unfolding Covid ‘leaky vaccines’ disaster, and the recent suggestion you are “considering making flu vaccinations free for all South Australians following calls from health experts”. See: Flu vaccine Adelaide: SA Premier considering making flu jabs free, The Advertiser, 25 May 2022. (Copy attached.)

I’ve submitted the following comment on The Advertiser article:

What is the evidence supporting flu vaccinations “for all South Australians”?

Who exactly is at serious risk of flu?

Flu jabs are now being pushed for children also – what is the evidence supporting flu jabs for children?

What is the impact of flu jabs and Covid jabs on the natural immune response?

What are the cumulative long-term effects of repeated flu jabs, and repeated Covid jabs throughout life?

Who exactly is behind this push for ‘free’ flu vaccinations “for all South Australians”?

On the subject of children and Covid jabs, I have still not received a response from ATAGI chair Nigel Crawford to my email: Why does ATAGI recommend COVID-19 mRNA injections for all children aged 5 to 11 years? 22 April 2022. Similarly, Royal Australian College of General Practitioners President Karen Price has not deigned to respond to my questions re ‘valid voluntary consent’ or my queries to her re COVID-19 mRNA injections being pressed upon children.

The lack of accountability to the Australian public for taxpayer-funded vaccination policy, including mandated vaccination policy, is a shocking situation in our supposed ‘liberal democracy’, and demonstrates utter contempt for the bodily autonomy and bodily integrity of all Australians.

Peter Malinauskas, here’s a reminder for you… 

Please see in the email thread below your email to me dated 1 April 2020, in response to my email of 28 March 2020, which included my rapid response published on The BMJ (aka The British Medical Journal).

Peter Malinauskas, I suggest you think very, very carefully about my previous email and my BMJ rapid response published on 25 March 2020…because some chickens could be coming home to roost in the emerging defective Covid ‘leaky vaccines’ disaster…

BMJ rapid response: Is it ethical to impede access to natural immunity? The case of SARS-CoV2

If children, young adults and others can mount their own effective immune response to SARS-CoV2, is it ethical to impede their ability to access natural immunity by interfering with the natural progression of the virus? 

According to the WHO, “Illness due to COVID-19 infection is generally mild, especially for children and young adults.”[1]

Is the focus on future fast-tracked vaccine products blocking full consideration of the opportunity for natural herd immunity? Who is Neil Ferguson to say “The only exit strategy [in the] long term for this is really vaccination or other forms of innovative technology that allows us to control transmission”.[2]

In regards to young people’s and others’ right to natural immunity, it’s also vital to consider the startling admission by Heidi Larson, Director of The Vaccine Confidence Project, during the recent WHO Global Vaccine Safety Summit, i.e. “…We’ve shifted the human population…to dependency on vaccine-induced immunity…We’re in a very fragile state now. We have developed a world that is dependent on vaccinations”.[3]

This is a very alarming statement by Professor Larson, particularly with the prospect of other epidemics emerging in the future. We have to learn to deal with epidemics and illnesses as they emerge, it’s not feasible to vaccinate the global population against every threat.

In a recent article raising concern about making decisions about this pandemic without reliable data, John Ioannidis notes that “School closures may also diminish the chances of developing herd immunity in an age group that is spared serious disease”.[4] The UK’s chief scientific adviser, Sir Patrick Vallance, raised the prospect of developing natural herd immunity[5], but this idea was subsequently howled down by Matt Hancock, the UK secretary of state for health and social care[6], and others such as Willem van Schaik, a professor of microbiology and infection, as reported by the Science Media Centre.[7]

Again, is it ethical to deny children, young people and others their opportunity for natural immunity, and to plan to make them dependent on vaccine-induce immunity, to in effect make them dependent on the vaccine industry? 

This is even more serious to consider in light of emerging vaccine product failures, e.g. pertussis and mumps.

The international community must be assured that independent and objective thinkers are carefully considering the way ahead on this matter.

The thing is Peter Malinauskas, I don’t think there were any independent and objective thinkers carefully considering the way ahead on this matter – ‘independence’ and ‘objectivity’ were very far indeed from the industry-driven Covid-19 response and the INSANE plan to inject the entire global population with Covid ‘leaky vaccines’ over and over again…

And now here we are, in a diabolical shambles, awash with defective Covid jabs, flu jabs, whatever lucrative jabs the vaccine industry wants to foist upon the community….and no idea of the impact on people’s natural immune response and long-term health.

Peter Malinauskas, please see our correspondence from 2020 in the email thread below.

Sincerely

Elizabeth Hart

Independent person investigating the over-use of vaccine products and conflicts of interest in vaccination policy. vaccinationispolitical.net

THE 2020 EMAIL

Sent: Saturday, 28 March 2020 12:35 PM

Dear Mr Malinauskas, what evidence is being used to support the draconian measures being imposed on 25.4 million Australians re COVID-19?

Who is advising our elected representatives on this matter? Who are your advisers and what qualifies them to recommend such drastic measures which are going to impact severely on our economy, our society, our health, our freedom to associate, our very liberty?

I understand a group of eminent Go8 infectious disease researchers has been convened at CMO, Professor Brendan Murphy’s request, to discuss and synthesize recommendations of the scope and scale of Social Distancing Measures re COVID.

Who are the members of this group who are influencing policy affecting all of us?

It is understandable to want to protect the vulnerable in our community who might be at risk with the current threat. But the WHO indicates most people will not be too troubled by the novel coronavirus. Is it not better for those at risk to self-isolate, and still provide them with services such as pharmacy deliveries, home library etc, and let others continue with their lives and livelihoods as herd immunity is built up?

My recent rapid response published on The BMJ (The British Medical Journal) is relevant, please see below:

BMJ Rapid Response: Is it ethical to impede access to natural immunity? The case of SARS-CoV2

If children, young adults and others can mount their own effective immune response to SARS-CoV2, is it ethical to impede their ability to access natural immunity by interfering with the natural progression of the virus?

According to the WHO, “Illness due to COVID-19 infection is generally mild, especially for children and young adults.”[1]

Is the focus on future fast-tracked vaccine products blocking full consideration of the opportunity for natural herd immunity? Who is Neil Ferguson to say “The only exit strategy [in the] long term for this is really vaccination or other forms of innovative technology that allows us to control transmission”.[2]

In regards to young people’s and others’ right to natural immunity, it’s also vital to consider the startling admission by Heidi Larson, Director of The Vaccine Confidence Project, during the recent WHO Global Vaccine Safety Summit, i.e. “…We’ve shifted the human population…to dependency on vaccine-induced immunity…We’re in a very fragile state now. We have developed a world that is dependent on vaccinations”.[3]

This is a very alarming statement by Professor Larson, particularly with the prospect of other epidemics emerging in the future. We have to learn to deal with epidemics and illnesses as they emerge, it’s not feasible to vaccinate the global population against every threat.

In a recent article raising concern about making decisions about this pandemic without reliable data, John Ioannidis notes that “School closures may also diminish the chances of developing herd immunity in an age group that is spared serious disease”.[4] The UK’s chief scientific adviser, Sir Patrick Vallance, raised the prospect of developing natural herd immunity[5], but this idea was subsequently howled down by Matt Hancock, the UK secretary of state for health and social care[6], and others such as Willem van Schaik, a professor of microbiology and infection, as reported by the Science Media Centre.[7]

Again, is it ethical to deny children, young people and others their opportunity for natural immunity, and to plan to make them dependent on vaccine-induce immunity, to in effect make them dependent on the vaccine industry?

This is even more serious to consider in light of emerging vaccine product failures, e.g. pertussis and mumps.

The international community must be assured that independent and objective thinkers are carefully considering the way ahead on this matter.

[References SUPPLIED]

Competing interests: No competing interests

25 March 2020

Elizabeth M Hart

SHARE

29 COMMENTS

  1. Basically it’s a crown zionist plot to take over the world. British royalty and all five eye nations secret services are owned by the Rothschild trading company, pushing the Belt and Road to develop the Eurasian empire at the expense of all the nations in the ‘west’, which they plan to depopulate and enslave. The war in Ukraina, past eight years, a horrific reality of the agenda with a population reduction of 10 million people since 2014.

    • Have you ever considered the “City of London” was first known as “Londinium” 2000 years ago and that the continuity quite likely never ended ?

      • Yes, it is secret societies in power, all related.
        The average punter, be they Londoners, Jews, Chinese etc. has no idea such evol exists, yet we listen to directives of serpents hellbent on abominations, day after day.
        Doherty Institute, head orfice of the five bsl4 labs in Oz. Now Albanese, replacing Morrison, parroting the ‘suckers scribe.

        Jesus called them out and He inspires all, then today and always.

  2. Ms Hart, thank you for so much effort. I hadn’t ever noticed the issue of “failure to grow up naturally” re immunity.

    Each time you mention a name, I feel “Hey, that person would not have been apointed to that position without first being approved by the masters as suitably lacking in moral character.”

    Has any reader out there ever heard of even one of the officials “seeing the light”? and maybe apologizing? Since that is so rare, it must be that 99% of them are uder mind control.

    This, in a democracy, would seem to make the government illegitimate overall.

    (Note: I don’t mean they are corrupted by mammon. I mean they are not connected to their brain. That is not the “corruption” for which we have an answer.)

    PS, off topic: Dee is foot-dragging.

      • I don’t think the words “Dee” and” holiday” ever appear iin the same sentence.

        Yes she is OK, in western Victoria as of last phone call.

  3. re: video
    At last a simple and clear explanation for why some people just “drop dead” or in other cases a heart attack suddenly comes out of nowhere and makes them crash their car, or aeroplane. And somewhat surprisingly the injections are being given against specific manufacturers directions.
    We are now being led into preparations for the death wave by our sold out red-blue governments. They are clamouring for more money for hospitals and they will soon be wanting to import more staff from the cheaper countries. The multiple-injected imports will also become hospital customers maybe within the suggested 5-year time-frame and more will be sourced in an ongoing consumption and replacement program. Superannuation funds will be carved up in various directions as the supposed owners of the actual money ( more accurately, credit ) won’t be around to claim it. The funds and administrators will pilfer it through exorbitant fees and more of it will end up in hospital insurance schemes. This is the way to taper a ponzi, previously thought impossible, all you do is kill off the shareholders. Some places like Melbourne can lose half the population with no ill effects at all, they will go through the hospital system from emergency to morgue, and the new Melbourne will be sexier and more affluent, for a while at least, with the vibrancy and energy of all the new citizens. In Perth, the workers are too expensive and need to be replaced by imports but the size of the city will not shrink, because the mining services have to be maintained. All in all the demographic plan is clear, to make Australia Inc. a better and more efficient industrial area, with removal of vast numbers of useless eaters and a strong focus on cost-effective increased productivity.

  4. Elizabeth Hart is on the right path, and that for years.

    I was just listening to Judy Mikovits on InfoWars a minute ago.

    Judy M fires up herself (as an example, watch at minute 38!) and she becomes very difficult to follow, not dissimilar to Gert Vanden Bossche. Most likely one should read her books to benefit maximally.
    Alex interrupts her several times trying to get clarity.

    Judy Mikovits’ final word: “Walk away! = Do not take any more shots”.

    https://www.bitchute.com/video/WfJxKwP2atKP/

  5. Our local council, instead of keeping rates down, has decided to go into publishing:

    “Message from the Mayor.
    Welcome to the June edition.
    Earlier this month I got to witness body camera footage of an extraordinary circumstance and the bravery of one of our own.
    A new Ranger with the City’s Community Safety team, was mid-way through his lunch break near a City reserve when he saw a young woman fighting for her life.
    Over the next half an hour, he performed CPR until the ambulance arrived, and he managed the family and members of the community who were also attempting to assist. His background as a police officer in the United Kingdom and extensive training served him well, and no doubt saved her life.”

    Our local council is apparently branching into emergency services, this will be a growth industry and well suited to the council which has also been heavily promoting the Covid-19™ fear + va666ine agenda. Create the problem then sell the solution, it’s a winning formula.

    • I imagine this brave fellow is “vaccinated”. If not he may now have the effects of a “vaccinated” being. Nowadays there is no way I will risk giving another person CPR in an attempt to save their life to probably forfeit my own. That would really be stupidity, not heroic.

    • “bravery”: I’m SO sick of seeing that word misused.
      Why is a child who has some sort of congenital affliction called “brave” ?
      To distract everyone from the fact that some things just can’t be controlled and others just have to be endured perhaps?

      And yes, right from the very inception of the covid fantasy there was a flurry of cost cutting & business scams rolled out via all levels of “government”, a trend that had been building up for years. As I’ve previously mentioned, my biggest beef is the closure of public toilets. It’s not exactly hard to figure out that an entity that can’t/won’t even maintain such a fundamental health/hygiene requirement can hardly be trusted with anything else

  6. This falling house of cards is totally illogical and diabolical, yet most have been fooled because they are stupid and they base their fear on what everybody thinks. This is due to the deliberate censorship of real news.
    Covid is the most deplorable violation of human rights ever enforced. Billions $ are granted to bsl4 labs that ‘we the people’ pay for, developing totally unnecessary poisonous concoctions that the eugenicists are injecting and murdering innocents with indiscriminately. Mass eugenics in order to enter the beast system. This AI technocracy is the most oppressive system of control ever conceived by the serpents of deception.
    ‘No jab, no job’, WHO benefits.

    • Ant, you may recall my April 5, 2020 report on John Curnow and Lyme disease. He thinks some bioweapons (or natural diseases?) are vectored as part of bird migration. He named Milson Island, NSW, as “suspicious.”

      My article included this quote from Fiona Barnett:

      “My own brother contracted Lyme Disease while working as a surveyor in the Northern NSW rainforest. Witnessing his ordeal, I discovered Australia to be the only country in the world not to recognise the existence of Lyme Disease. Owing to our Government’s blatant denial, and ruthless persecution of dissident doctors, my brother and an estimated 60,000 fellow Aussie Lyme Disease sufferers have been denied medical treatment, workers’ compensation, social security, and more.”

      • What I’ve realised here looking back, everything is good around the barbie having snags and beers on weekends. Our diversity stimulating and bonding as it should be. True colours are revealed during the working week, on how the juice really flows, the ‘caste’ system entrenched. A pyramid structure, top down, goons and snoops recruited from communist regimes, supervised by pirbright pilgrim 🎓 graduates. Freemasonry the ring that bonds them. “It’s a club and we ain’t in it.”

  7. The New York Times has just sent out their Summer Reading List (as northern summer unofficially begins on Memorial Day, May 30):

    See if you see mention of my book “Unreality; Sandy Hook Messes Minds” here. NY Times says:

    I’ve been excited to try my colleague Eric Kim’s cookbook, “Korean American: Food That Tastes Like Home.” It’s described as “exuberant and erudite,” so I’m hoping it’ll be as fun to read as to cook from. Keith Thomson’s maritime history “Born to Be Hanged: The Epic Story of the Gentlemen Pirates Who Raided the South Seas, Rescued a Princess, and Stole a Fortune” sounds transporting. I want to read pretty much every thriller in Sarah Lyall’s roundup, especially Dervla McTiernan’s “The Murder Rule”: “part legal thriller, part detective story, part analysis of a small-town reign of terror and part excavation of the secrets and lies of the past.”

    Unbelievable! They skipped me!

  8. Truly, I am stunned. Jacinda got a standing ovation at Harvard Commencement when she pushed Gun conrtol. And she got no Boo-ing when she asked for more “responsible” control over social media. So there’s 2 amendments, First and Second, not loved by the 2022 graduates. Wow. I wonder how long this has been going on.

    My father graduated in the Class of 1922. I sent an article about him to the Harvard Crimson (student newspaper) a month ago and also to the alumni office. I was sure I would be invited to the Commencement. Have not had any reply.

    Dee, do you want to publish my Daddy article? God help us.

  9. In Australian politics, Holmes-a-Court’s Teal party is having its honeymoon, people want to believe it will be something different, their platform was to fight ClimateChange™ and corruption, let’s see them get out of this unscathed !!! At least the Blue party’s adoption of the ALP standard policy of Free Money worked for a while, if the blue party really wanted to win they would have kept it going. But they were told to take a dive and let the communists run things from there on. The only question in my mind is, did Holmes-a-Court senior fake his death (probably) and where is he now.
    Meanwhile in the US the old question of “Is Trump a Globalist minion or not” seems to be more “not” since he has been down at the NRA reinforcing the 2nd amendment, hardly something the communo-fascist Globalists would want him to do. But who knows, the script is written by think-tanks much smarter than me.

C'mon Leave a Reply, Debate and Add to the Discussion

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.