Home Australia An Open Letter to Dr Paul Mullen Regarding Martin Bryant

An Open Letter to Dr Paul Mullen Regarding Martin Bryant

44

by Mary Maxwell

To Paul Mullen, Psychiatrist and “Chief of Forensic Psychiatry at Monash University.”

I was shocked to see, when perusing a 2006 article in The Age, that you told that newspaper that Dunblane was the trigger point for Port Arthur.

What? What are you talking about? How could you say that in 2006, completely contradicting what you presented to the DPP in 1996?

Dunblane

The Age article, dated March 29, 2006, is entitled “Shedding Light on the Port Arthur Killer.” (O Gorrrd.) The reporter quotes you as saying:

“He [Martin Bryant] followed Dunblane. His planning started with Dunblane. Before that he was thinking about suicide, but Dunblane and the early portrayal of the killer, Thomas Hamilton, changed everything.”

You know that is not true, Dr Mullen. Did you even write it, or did the media furnish it from their endless stock of ideas to deceive the public? The goal of the real murderers is to persuade us that the real Martin Bryant was at Port Arthur on April 28, 1996. No he was not. You know he was not.

In 1996 you offered a different bunch of misstatements. Have you no conscience?

In the official court case, R v Bryant we see your statement:

“I have prepared this report at the request of Mr Bryant’s legal representative, Mr John Avery. It is based on interview conducted on the 4 May 1996 at the Royal Hobart Hospital, lasting in total some 3 1/2 hours. In addition I had access to extensive documentation.”

Here is your description of your talk with Martin, Beginning on page 361 of the DPP’s transcript (as presented to the Court in November 1996):

“The enormity of Mr Bryant’s crimes call out for some explanation equally dramatic and extraordinary. It is not to be wondered at that the media have either attempted to portray Mr Bryant as afflicted by a dramatic mental illness, such as schizophrenia, or to be some kind of evil genius. In my opinion the origins of this terrible tragedy are not to be found in a single dramatic and sufficient cause, but in the interaction and combination of a range of influences and events. We may never know fully the intentions and state of mind which led to the killings, but a number of contributions are apparent.”

Dr Mullen you may not know “the intentions which led to the killings”, but they certainly were not Bryant’s intentions. They were the intentions of the actual murderers, not some poor patsy.

I continue the quote:

“Mr Bryant is an intellectually limited man who from early childhood showed marked impairment in his capacity to cope with interpersonal and social relationships. He responded to frustrations with aggression towards others and towards property. From an early age his behaviour was characterised by an unfortunate tendency to take delight in the discomfort of others and in the tormenting of people and creatures weaker than himself. This probably reflected in part the struggles of a child who felt buffeted and helpless in the face of the demands of the world and who sought to gain some sense of power, and restore some sense of self-esteem, through ridiculing and hurting others.” [all emphasis in this article is by me, MM]

What’s Your Source?

That is not true. What record of his childhood are you reading from? You did not interview his mother or sister. Whom did he ridicule? From what we see in the two lengthy interviews with Martin – by police on July 4, 1996 and by John Avery in October 1996 — there is no tone of ridicule. No indication that he wanted to hurt others, rather the opposite. He even mentioned that he does not do practice-shooting with glass bottles in case the broken glass would hurt an animal’s foot.

So who are you to tell the Court that this is a personality feature of Martin. Did he ridicule anyone while he was being interviewed by you? Did he strike you as the ridiculing type? I’ll bet not.

You opine, in a sympathetic-sounding way:

“Mr Bryant received considerable support from his father and there are indications in the record during his later adolescence that a degree of stability and more effective social integration was beginning to emerge in this young man. The relationship with Ms Harvey for all its eccentric features probably added to Mr Bryant’s increasing sense of having some place in the world. The death first of Ms Harvey and then the suicide of his father stripped away from Mr Bryant the two main sources of support and stability in his life.”

Well, it would wouldn’t it. By the way do you know that a cop named Phil Pyke told the world that when Martin heard of his Dad’s death he laughed. Of course that cop can say anything, as there is no chance given to Martin to refute anything.

By the way, you must be aware from the publication in The Bulletin in April 2006 that Martin told his lawyer, John Avery, that two doctors at Risdon were trying to brainwash him into not having a trial. Who were those two? They have been disguised in the transcript by Avery as Dr B and Dr D. When you heard of it, did you rush to find out? One of them could be Dr Ian Sale.

Schizo

It looks like your assignment from Avery in 1996 was to make sure no one could claim that the 29 year-old Bryant was unfit to stand trial. To that end you brought up the reference to schizophrenia — to rule it out. I quote you:

“In February 1984 Mr Bryant was assessed by a very experienced clinical psychiatrist, Dr Cunningham-Dax. This assessment was initiated to consider Mr Bryant’s eligibility for a disability pension. Dr Cunningham-Dax stated that Mr Bryant was intellectually handicapped and personality disordered. He also raised the possibility that he might be developing an illness of a schizophrenic type.

“On the basis of this report and subsequent assessments which relied upon it, Mr Bryant was granted a disability pension. There are subsequent references to Mr Bryant having a schizophrenic illness and of being a paranoid schizophrenic in the records of Dr Mather (December 1991) and Dr P M McCartney (December 1991). These diagnostic formulations, it transpired, were not the results of the doctors own conclusions, but based on the report of Mr Bryant’s mother that he had been diagnosed by Dr Cunningham-Dax as suffering from this illness.”

What? A doctor makes a “diagnostic formulation” based on what a mother said a doctor said? Hello? You know no doctor ever does that. He or she would look at the records and examine the patient. This is all getting to be absurd.

Not So Freudian Slip

At one point (this is kind of funny) you made a slip. The judge of course could have ordered that the record not show it but Justice William Cox did not object and needless to say the ‘defense” lawyer John Avery said nothing. I quote you:

“[Martin] described his pleasure in life as watching the television, music and killing. – sorry, I’ll reread that. “Mr Bryant described his pleasure in life as watching the television, music and drinking. The music that he most favoured was the sound track of the Lion King and records made by Cliff Richard. On direct questioning he acknowledged that he spent a considerable amount of time watching videos and going to the pictures.”

Your Mike Willessee Chatter

Now for the 2016 “twentieth anniversary” TV show hosted by Mike Willessee. You said of Bryant:

“He wanted to be seen as powerful and evil. Some of the early news coverage which portrayed him as demonic was exactly what he wanted — delighted him.”

Ahem, did he say to you “Dr Mullen, the news coverage delighted me?” Did he say that at your one-and-only meeting with him, dated May 4 – five days after his burns? Martin claims he was not allowed to see TV or read papers – and that hospital personnel were not allowed to tell him what the Port Arthur massacre was all about.

So how did you know he was delighted? Do you have ESP?

What about My Querulousness?

I see from Pubmed that you have written about those of us who go to court to seek redress. I quote you:

“Querulous paranoia was once of considerable clinical and academic interest in psychiatry. Over the last 40 years, however, it has virtually disappeared from the professional landscape. This decline occurred [when folks were] asserting their individual rights through the pursuit of claims and grievances …. through which they seek their vision of justice”.

Their vision? Is “due process” a personal hallucination? I continue:

“This article examines querulous behaviour in the vexatious litigant …. The phenomenological and nosological issues [diagnosis] are outlined and the risks of the emergence of threatening and violent behaviour is emphasized.

“Threats should not be ignored, for a variety of reasons. Approaches to managing querulous behaviour in the courts and the complaint organizations are discussed …Those caught up in a querulous pursuit of their notion of justice are amenable to management that can ameliorate their suffering and reduce the disruption they create.”

Just simply Wow.

Aramoana

Finally, but you knew I was coming to this, Doctor? Aramoana, New Zealand. The killing spree by David Grey, at which Michael Dyson handled the SOG response. You handled the psychiatry. So, everybody wants to know: why were you living in Aramoana of all places, a nice, cosmopolitan Melburnian like You?

People are dying to know. I’m waiting to see what you can come up with. Maybe an elderly aunt asked you to visit or something? Maybe you study a particular species of conch native to the area?

As recently as August 12, 2015 the Canberra Times recounted your glories:

“He interviewed Martin Bryant, the man who shot 35 people dead in the Port Arthur massacre in 1996, and Hoddle Street mass murderer Julian Knight, who he more recently assessed as being unlikely to repeat the random shooting spree that killed seven in Melbourne in 1987. He worked on the Snowtown​ murders in the 1990s, also known as the bodies-in-barrels case, which has been described as Australia’s worst serial killings. [They forgot Aramoana.]

“Professor Mullen has also worked as an expert assessor for the US Army defence team acting for former Guantanamo Bay detainee David Hicks, and assessed Bali nine pair Andrew Chan and Myuran Sukumaran years before their execution.”

What was the point of an Australian shrink studying prisoners caught in the Indonesian justice system? And what did you do at Chelmsford?

“The court appointed [Mullen] as its expert in the Chelmsford Hospital medical negligence case, the largest of its kind to date, which sued for the devastating use of electroconvulsive and deep-sleep therapy on patients with mental illness.”

Never mind I don’t want to know.

–Mary Maxwell is an elderly querulous American Australian with a bee in her bonnet about the continued incarceration of a patsy in Oz, Martin Bryant, and a patsy in US: Jahar Tsarnaev.

SHARE

44 COMMENTS

    • Thank you. Here is a quote from your website, Timothy, written by you, I assume:

      A very thorough Sky investigation published on You Tube on the 22nd June, 2017. (Note date!) (4) The programme must have been completed within seven days of the event. It should be noted that the Sun, also part of the Murdoch empire, by strange coincidence, had what appears to have had a pre-prepared article on the 22.5.2017 – the very day of the Manchester attack – specifically linking Corbyn to IRA terrorism, and this before the up-coming election. (5) It was described as “disgraceful” and caused a major political storm. (6)

      Dis you ever look into the Childers backpacker fire in 2000? Killed 15 hosteliers.

        • Nedskipooh, he started out by saying that Monash is a haven of naughty. That is the connection. It is I who reached for the fire example as I only recently heard of the Childers fire (for which someone is doing life), and it is probably not your basic random arsonist ifyouknowwhatimean.

          Actually Timothy started by saying “Monash and the Jewish community there” but I am tired tonight and don’t want to have to defend my friends the Jews.

          Still, I hear from the Boston set that NPR (sacred radio to some) has actually allowed Alison Weir to yak for 30 minutes on the Balfour declaration, and the Louis Brandeis connection. I think Brandeis University should just change its name and get it over with. Save a lot of angst.

  2. Excellent letter.

    I had no idea about the Aramoana event, let alone Mullen’s involvement.

    The two mugshots remind me of something out of a Hitchcock horror pic.:In one he looks as mad as a snake, in the other he looks like a wannabe clergyman. Talk about schizophrenic!

      • Oh, brother, did I forget to mention about pix? The University of Adelaide Law School has a photography contest every year and his year the theme is Alternative Facts. WINK WINK NUDGE NUDGE.

        Please grab you cell phone camera in the morning, take a pix of something and relate it to any of our wink winks or nudge nudges. You get a 100-word text to describe it.

        https://law.adelaide.edu.au/news-and-events/photographic-competition

        I have tried it other years to no avail, but am trying again with my photo of the rainbow LGBT flag which — in Adelaide — is worth about 20 points right then and there.

        Not that that’s why I chose it. I chose it because all the pix in my American cell phone are unable to be accessed (Thank you Verizon, you will be sorry on Judgement Day) whereas the rainbow flag got into a Gumhshoe article in June, from whence I lifted it. Yay.

        AL-TER-NA-TIVE FACTS.

    • “In one he looks as mad as a snake”, that’s because he is a psychopath, he has no empathy, no conscience – you’re looking into the eyes of a reptile.

  3. Wow! Give it to him. Of course his type are too aloof to debate the facts in the article. After all he is a professional. In the profession of what?

    There should have been an official inquiry as to why one particular person has been involved with all these mass shooters or accused mass shooters, before each of them went out on their killing spree. Especially when that person moved overseas temporarily to be in contact with one of those killers.

    Notice I said in contact BEFORE the killer went off the deep end.

    • Mal, Mullen is the go-to guy for a cover up. His biggest gig was being appointed as the court psychiatrist for the Chelmsford Royal Commission. It was his job to avoid the mind control links back to Cameron in Canada and the CIA. The Royal Commission made a determination that it was ‘medical negligence’, but it was intentional – they were using those people like lab rats.

      Since he has all those links back to spook work, then if he looks a bit arrogant in those pictures, it’s because he is – he knows he can’t be touched.

    • Oh yeah, I should have mentioned one more mass shooting. Mullen seems to get around and be available whenever there is a ‘gun control’ agenda mass shooting. – He was also available at Monash University when that shooting occurred and there was a push to ban handguns.

      Andrew MacGregor, Stewart Beatty and I were confident that there was going to be a ‘handgun massacre’ because of the ‘predictive programming’ in the media. We also figured it was going to be a school shooting. Our only surprise was that it was on a college campus and not in a grade school. We might have figured that out if we had paid attention to where Mullen was located.

      • There actually are people who are moved from one crisis to the next, either to hose things down, or to get dangerous or deservedly unpopular projects across the hurdles of public opinion.

        I am currently up against one at this moment and I am going to make sure this is his last gig.

  11. “Dunblane was the ‘trigger’ for Port Arthur”

    uh….yeh!

    youse people have really gotta start ‘reading-between-the-lines’ and stop taking what people, esp. influential people like Mullen, say @ face value…..
    start looking for hidden motives…
    as in: what’s his ‘agenda’? what’s he really saying?

    qui bono?

    get it?

    yeh….Dunblane was the ‘trigger’ all-right…..

    b’cs both Dunblane AND Port Arthur were cooked up by the same bunch of hoaxers…..
    and ….. Dunblane was the ‘softening up’ blow to get AUssies disoriented by Port Arthur…
    since many Aussies, back then, had rels and family still living in the UK….it had much more impact than some-thing occurring in the US would…..
    i shouldn’t even hafta ‘spell out’ stuff like this…it should be SELF-EVIDENT!

    https://nodisinfo.com/dunblane/;
    https://nodisinfo.com/dublane-massacre-hoax/ ;

  15. My belief is…The Port Arthur Massacre was a Psyops but it was the pinnacle of Martins Psyops, Martin had been groomed from a young age to perpetrate the PAM and the Bullivant family used the sale of Natures Own vitamins to Sanofi Pharmaceuticals as a front for payment for getting Martin Bryant to do the Port Massacre, Martin did it, but Avery, Professor Paul Mullen(and others) and ‘criminal elite” such as Vaughan Bullivant used a technology called Remote Neural Monitoring, with voices transmitted to Martins head with a technology called The Microwave Hearing Auditory Effect or Voice to Skull or the voice of god technology and the use of directed energy weapons with organised stalking to abuse Martin to the point of lashing out and perpetrating mass murder and the logic behind this is that electronic harassment and organised stalking techniques exactly replicate the symptoms of schizophrenia and other mental illnesses according to the DSM of MD(Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders) and therefore anyone who complains about being organised stalked and electronic harassment is immediately medicated and or hospitalized because this is serious no one wants another Martin Bryant and another PAM and who manufactures the psyche drugs forced onto people?…. Sanofi Pharmaceuticals(The company that paid the Bullivants $137 500 000) and they bill medicare the full cost of medications and who else benefits?…Psychiatry people such as Professor Paul Mullen who charge thousands of dollars an hour to stand around and carry on like they’re the experts and the “mind people” when they are the ones actually responsible for covertly abusing good harmless people to do mass murder or other horrific criminal acts such as getting people to drive down our city malls running over as many people as they can such as what James(JImmy) Gargasoulas did on the 20 January 2017 at the Bourke Street Mall at Melbourne or inducing(tricking) that Mum(Miss Thaiday) in Cairns to murder her eight children.To say that Australian Military personal are responsible is disheartening to members of our armed forces who would never do such a thing and saying such things causes the exact type of discord the choreographers of the Port Arthur Massacre want which is to divide us and make us run around in circles getting angry and confused. The gun banning is a side effect of the real reason for the Port Arthur massacre.

  16. The Motive was to remove Guns from the people of Australia.
    Martin did not do it. How do we know?
    He never got a Court Trial because the Australian Government knew that people would realise that Martin did not have the capacity and skill to do it.
    Not to give a Man a trial to defend himself is a Crime in itself and unlawful.

  17. […] Tarrant in fact would also be supplied by the same company that had armed David Gray Gun City owned by Christian fundamentalist David Tipple before Tarrant, poorly vetted armed with thousands of rounds, began training at a police friendly rifle range. A range inhabited by like ‘right wing’ minded individuals whose behaviour had led to several complaints to the police which were ignored or the police threatened. The lack of action following complaints in yet another replication of Grey who was also brought to police and mental health official yet slipped through the net repeatedly before going on to kill his first victim being Gary Holden a well known activist who had cost the local old boys millions when he prevented the construction of aluminium smelter due to environmental concerns.https://gumshoenews.com/2018/04/29/an-open-letter-to-dr-paul-mullen-regarding-martin-bryant/ […]

  18. Hey, I’m Paul Mullens grandson (step-grandson technically), and I just want to say you people are fucken nuts ay. this is by far the funniest thing i’ve ever read. i’ll make sure he reads it next time i see him cos he’ll crack up too. if you have any other conspiracies involving my relatives please link them i’m loving this.

    • Joseph, I would love to interview your grandfather on camera, so I could ask him a few questions. Maybe he could clear up about 40 points of evidence that have never been addressed. My email is at the bottom of the site.

  19. That is an interview that is needed and should be streamed live but I don’t believe Dr Mullen can handle that without getting to hot under the collar and overwhelmingly flustered.

C'mon Leave a Reply, Debate and Add to the Discussion

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.