Home Trump “And Finishing Off with Iran” — A Conspiracy for World War Three. ...

“And Finishing Off with Iran” — A Conspiracy for World War Three.  Is It Treason?

119
General Qasem Soleimani

by Mary W Maxwell, LLB

I am a low-profile candidate for US president, on the ballot of only one state primary, New Hampshire’s, to be held on February 11, 2020. I am a conservative Republican, as seen on my website ConstitutionAndTruth.com  My “preferred president” would be Senator Rand Paul, even though he is not running — at the moment.

To be a US president is a huge job, no doubt an impossible job. Foreign policy, too, is an impossible job. But the Framers of our Constitution were geniuses. They were familiar with Europe’s incessant wars, and they came up with very good guidance about the machinations of the powerful.

Below I will exclaim loudly that their guidance can’t work if the persons in government are traitors — that is if they are answering to a power other than the people (as expressed in the document itself, that was agreed to in 1789).

Yesterday, President Trump ordered the assassination of a general in the Iranian military (in Iraq).  Please step aside from the particulars of the case for a moment and consider the general question: “If Nation A kills the military leader of Nation B, will Nation B react in some violent way?”

Surely the answer is Yes. Therefore, Trump must be intending to start a war.  It is often said that the next war will begin in the Middle East will be very complicated, and thus probably lead to a World War.

Who Is Responsible for the Assassination in Iran?

Some conspiracy theories are junk, but many are accurate. Here at GumshoeNews.com, we endeavor to cover the accurate ones. I wish we had been able to push this information more assertively on the public. Maybe if the best of the theorists would go harder, we’d not now have both a raging bushfire in Australia and a potential war.

I assume the “outbreak of hostilities” in Iran is a fulfillment of the memo that General Wesley Clark revealed to the world in 2007. He claims to have seen it at the Pentagon in 2001 after we were already attacking Afghanistan. That memo listed 7 more countries that we (the US) would destroy.

The seven are: Libya, Lebanon, Somalia, Sudan, Iraq, Syria …”and finishing off with Iran.”

Did we not accomplish all but the last two?  Shouldn’t Congress have jumped on the matter in 2007, or at least some time before now?  Pretend you are a Congressman. You see the Democracy Now video of Wesley Clark’s interview. You smell a rat. But you are inexperienced in foreign policy.

So, you abdicate your responsibility. You let nature take its course, as it were. More of the seven continue to be destroyed, always on some barely plausible excuse. (E.g., US troops’ entry into Somalia was for a humanitarian mission; Iraq had WMD’s, etc.).

Who, if not you, O Congressman, should have acted? Whoever is leaderly in your chamber should have acted. I note Rep Tulsi Gabbard got her act together and went to Syria to interview President Assad. Rep Barbara Lee put her foot down on the renewal of AUMF (authorization for use of military force), which was Congress’s kowtowing to Pres Bush after 9/11.

The AUMF unconstitutionally handed Congress’s war-making power to the executive on the flimsy pretext of ferreting out terrorists. Oh, come on.

Those two gals were not listened to. Two is not enough to overcome laziness, ignorance, and treachery on the Hill.

Next, the military itself could have objected. Occasionally some retired officers do object (never those in active service, as they might lose their pension!).

One active-serviceman, Captain Nathan Smith, took the matter to court in 2016, but the judiciary did its own version of kowtowing to the president.

I, too, took it to court, in 2017, in protest of Trump’s threat to nuke North Korea, but to no avail. My case relied correctly on Article I, sec 8, clause 11 of the parchment. A president is NOT ALLOWED to make war short of a Congressional decision. This is because, as the framers said at the 1787 convention, a president, like a king, might get carried away and also might make secret deals.

A Fresh Impeachment

President Trump should now be re-impeached by the House of Reps for his reckless risking of world war by ordering the assassination of an Iranian general.  I hear you say “But , Mary, the decision may have been a good strategic one. It may have saved soldiers lives, etc.”  Fine. But that’s for Congress to decide. Trump acted illegally. Period.

There needs to be an intelligent debate when war is being considered. (Note to millennials: There actually were intelligent debates in Congress before you were born. Honest. They’re still needed, and they should not be “on party lines.”)

In regard to trying a president for misuse of the war power, recall Rep Henry Gonzalez, in 1991 offering articles of Impeachment against the senior president Bush. Article III said “[Poppy] has prepared, planned, and conspired to engage in a massive war against Iraq [including] the placement of and potential use of of nuclear weapons.”

Try Him for Treason?

It is my guess that Trump is not his own man. He is a puppet for someone. Most US presidents of the last 100 years were puppets. One exception would be Franklin Delano Roosevelt, a member of the top cabal (on the Delano side of his family).

Perhaps Poppy Bush, who had been CIA Director before being president, also made policy up on his own initiative. But  I speculate that Wilson, Truman, Ike, LBJ, Nixon, Ford, Reagan, Clinton, Sonny, Obama, and Trump were carrying out orders from above.

Let’s consider if they are traitors. The Constitution is clear as to the crime of treason. In Article III, section 3, we read:

“Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.”

A president who is a puppet for the cabal — or for any secret group whose actions are inimical to the American people — can be accused of “giving aid and comfort” to the Enemy.

Granted, the Framers did not foresee a cabal. They did not foresee cars or computers, either — but they knew enough to insist that the war-making power not be placed anywhere but in the legislature.

That’s because this is where the people are best represented. People have a vested interest in peace. They don’t want their sons to die. Maybe they would agree to a war in defense of the nation, but have any of the US’s wars really been of the defensive type?

Note: hardly anyone ever gets tried for treason in America. I think that’s because the cabal does not want citizens to think about it. The crime committed by Aldrich Ames — selling secrets to the Soviets — could easily have been categorized as treason, but instead he was convicted of some other crime.

Donald Trump need not fear a grand jury looking to see if he is indictable for treason. If not guilty, he can have fun chastising the jurymen for doing a bad job.

I realize I look like a monster for even saying this president may be a traitor, but don’t you wish others had said it of earlier presidents? Recall Woodrow Wilson and Lyndon Johnson.  It is said that Wilson could be controlled simply by blackmail over an extramarital affair. Imagine it. (Poor thing.)  LBJ must have been Mob-controlled, as was Nixon.

Is Israel the Boss?

I have argued many times that the race to find the source of evil in any one group is stupid.  I especially enjoy railing against the theory that “It’s the Jews.”

Granted, in regard to the Middle East, we do hear Israeli “spokespersons” boasting about their plan to get rid of such countries as are a threat to Israel. I can only say here that I think the leaders of Israel are just as enslaved to the cabal as anyone else.  I think the enslavers are based in Britain.

It looks as though many Congressmen think the boss they are supposed to obey is the one who tells them to uphold Israel’s interest.  If I am right, that boss is just a front-man, using “Israel’s interest” as a way of getting support for the cabal’s policy. (He or she uses a money bribe or a threat of trouble regarding reelection).

Either way, the Congressman is guilty. Of what crime?  I can’t quite say he is guilty of treason, as the wording in the Constitution is too tight. Perhaps corruption, or “obstruction of Congress.”

We should be jumping on all Congressmen who kowtow to Israel. It is ridiculous to see them giving numerous standing ovations during each talk by Bibi Netanyahu.

On a lesser charge than treason, Trump can be accused of breach of his Article II responsibility to honor the Bill of Rights. The Constitution lays out his oath of office:

[I] will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States.

Recently, Trump signed a document cancelling federal funding for colleges that recommend “BDS” for Israel. (BDS is boycott, divestment, sanctions, as a way to get Israel to stop oppressing the Palestinians.) It would be hard to think of a more direct challenge to the First Amendment right to free speech.

What Is the War Crime Situation Here?

You can see that I disapprove of the assassination of an Iranian general on various grounds. Do I also see a breach of international law?  No, I don’t, as I personally do not believe there is such a thing as international law.

In regard to war crimes, however, the US has its own set of domestic laws that call for the punishment of Americans who commit war crimes. In 1996, Congress passed the War Crimes Act and it is codified at 18 USC 2401ff. It says:

“Whoever, whether inside or outside the United States, commits a war crime, in any of the circumstances described in subsection (b), shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for life or any term of years, or both, and if death results to the victim, shall also be subject to the penalty of death.”

“War crime” is defined as a “grave breach of the Geneva Convention.”  I am not sufficiently informed of the circumstances of the Iranian general’s assassination to say if it is a war crime. I doubt that it is.

However,  Common Article 3 of the Geneva’s includes torture and other outrages upon personal dignity. The US is presently torturing many people at Guantanamo Bay and elsewhere. You may have figured that this had stopped following certain court cases. No, it has not stopped.

Or you may have figured that it is justifiable, in order to extract information from a terrorist. It is well established that torture is not a reliable way to get information.  It would be better to pay attention to George Orwell’s torturer in “Room 101” who explains that “the purpose of torture is torture,”

Are the US president and many military officers guilty of war crimes?  I say Yes. And not just officers but soldiers who carry out any instruction to torture.

Conclusion

These are not happy times for our nation.  I am hoping that the newest crisis, making Americans apprehensive about war, will lead us back to the path of law.

For decades we have been acculturated to the (loony) idea that prestigious persons should never be punished. We have lulled ourselves with the idea that “the flag is still there.” That is, we make assumptions that rule of law is actually seen to, by the judiciary and others.

Generally we Americans think right will prevail.

Good-oh. Let’s have it prevail now. Let’s get up off our duff and make it prevail. The outcome could be wonderful.

SHARE

119 COMMENTS

  2. Did they hold back the impeachment papers — waiting for the next one. I can’t help but think Trump was potentially set up here. But we don’t have the Intel documents.

    • Dee, the ‘impeachment’ was solely a bipartisan attempt (Dimwits) to hinder the release of the FISA documents, and as such, hold no charges that would implicate Trump in any wrongdoing, hence the reason for why the ‘urgent impeachment’ has not been produced on the floor of the Senate and also for why some Republican and Democrat Senators are now calling the ‘impeachment’ as dead in the water. A Bill will soon be presented in the Senate to kill the ‘impeachment’ some time this month.

    • The impeachment is theatre, justice is rigged, forget about any sort of justice, it’s theatre.
      The money crowd who runs everything is not organised unless you mean by being members of Bush controlled golf clubs, going to Davos, House of Lords etc.
      WW3 began when Poppy Bush set up Kuwait as bait for Saddam and I am glad you mentioned Wesley Clark’s 7 wars in 5 years because it gives substance to this observation, the “world wars” should be called oil wars because oil war 1 (1914) was started to keep the Germans from building a train line through Serbia and Turkey to bring back oil to Europe. Oil war 2 (1939) was an extension of the same thing. Oil war 3 (1990) was started by Poppy Bush and his cabal, who had worked together in the Nixon admin, dispatching the Kennedys, throwing Nixon under the bus (he was just a stupid old time politician who thought he could do things the old way), and getting his skull & bones fraternity mates into all the jobs. So WW3 actually started in 1990 and the Hitler figure was Poppy, but this WW3 is limited because it cannot go nuclear for obvious reasons, hence, it is dragged out over decades, and consists of bashing smaller places and using them as proxies.
      As well as selling weapons there are the oil pipelines, the invasion of Syria by Obama and Hillary was in order to run a pipeline through but Putin wouldn’t allow it, now they are talking about an Israel pipeline. The invasion of Libya by Obama and Hillary was simply to pick off an upstart small-time competitor who was always too troublesome. All the refugees are of no consequence.
      (Speaking of treason, Abbott’s role in shutting down Rudd’s Hybrid Camry initiatives just before electric cars started to take off is of interest.)
      With the drone assassination yesterday, I think we can see the role of Secretary of State clearly. Mike Pompeo (former CIA boss) will tell Trump what to do, it’s a bit like the Hong Kong government. Trump can sack him if he comes up with some good reason and then another one will be found who is hardly different.
      In the same way Hillary was the puppet who ran the Obama puppet. Obama let everyone walk all over him and now he goes around, probably getting paid off via the “speaking tours” thing, saying he is “woke”. He let the banks steal everything from the poor blacks and now he says he is “woke”.
      Trump doesn’t have the power to overthrow the swamp and the person he answers to first is his beauty queen wife who wants world peace. That’s what beauty queens want, they all tell us that. Trump’s greatest legacy to the world will probably be simply telling us officially, that everything is a lie. This gift should never be underestimated. Trump’s most amazing achievement is simply his own daily survival.
      The Bush empire has been going for generations, since George Herbert Walker (plantations, banking and shipping for the Nazis) and before that I think I heard King George III. Anyone thinks Trump can unravel all this in one or two terms is delusional, but who knows what the guy is capable of, if he can survive.
      There was once a magazine called George, to lead everyone in the right direction, but nobody was paying much attention at the time, it was 1999, blood moon, and W had just got the Republican nomination, so we were all distracted, and could not see things in plain sight.

  3. tulsi
    https://www.tulsi2020.com/a/we-need-get-out-iraq-and-syria-now?contactdata=zryv2fL4ptCLFaXuGg1gE9%2f8ReVCGd6wmov3ZCszvj0tyy5KTkhAcbgLYJpcqcuFzI4giR%2bsEbrzv4PPI6sxn9of7bFRiNsAUV0DgS%2f3DnUpql63hPs8FENAiU%2fkihERhB0zUMmKxP6Iivd2sen%2fvkht8Jzh7xkXlkBy0CEP%2filXOVVFYka7GByHLs1jhHSTAvJY4nnkZXSkGOB5LfjTrQ%3d%3d&ms=em200103&refcode2=c0e36634-8b2e-ea11-a601-2818784d6d68&emci=bfe36634-8b2e-ea11-a601-2818784d6d68&emdi=c0e36634-8b2e-ea11-a601-2818784d6d68&ceid=926703

  4. I think it’s important not to mistake means for end. Particularly in the case of openly threatening a figure in another country. Countries can and often do “probe” one another, look for a reaction, hope for a mistake in that reaction, and then capitalize politically on that mistake if and when it occurs.
    KAL007 was a great example of this. There was much more going on over Kamchatka/Sakhalin than just an off-course airliner on that night.

    In the case of “calling for assassination”, it’s important to note that effective extra-national and extrajudicial killing (murdering influential people elsewhere on purpose for gain) is substantially compromised if it is made public. Also worth noting that there is no need to make it public.

    Obama ordered many extrajudicial killings outside the US, but the list of who was next was generally not completely public for good reason.

    My opinion is that the desired result was to see how the geopolitical universe would react to the threat. That is not to say that the goal of war with Iran is not present. It would, however, be politically more expedient if that war appeared to be “justified” by some action Iran took.

  5. Two days before the protests against the vast US military compound in Baghdad (aka embassy) there were a number of air strikes against Iraqi (and Syrian) forces actually engaged in fighting ISIS.

    Déjà vu Deir ez-Zur …

    Recall Deir ez-Zur in Syria – 17 September 2016 – when Syrian soldiers were closing in on an ISIS outpost – the US came to the rescue of their proxy militia then also, killing 80 Syrian soldiers..

    US Air Strikes Kill 80 Syrian Soldiers Besieged by ISIS

    https://russia-insider.com/en/us-air-strikes-kill-80-syrian-soldiers-besieged-isis/ri16504

    (This event, including the Australian government’s role in this war crime was discussed here on Gumshoe with some excellent insight by James O’Neill I recall.)

    On Australia’s role in the massacre [September 2016] of Syrian soldiers – Questions to Ms Bishop, Australian Foreign Minister
    https://disinformationfinder.net/2016/09/19/on-australias-role-in-the-massacre-of-syrian-soldiers-questions-to-ms-bishop-australian-foreign-minister/

    Fast forward to December 2019 – with Idlib under threat of liberation and the Pope calling for peace, the US has been busy redeploying their proxy militia, mainly to Iraq (as is Turkey – to Libya). Again, with Iraqi forces threatening these proxy terrorists, the US had to do something to protect their ‘assets’.

    Faces of the young Iraqi soldiers martyred by US attack

    These men were fighting AGAINST the US/Israeli proxy ISIS terrorists – they had families too so I imagine there was some emotion in the homes and on the streets directed against the command centre in Baghdad for this latest atrocity.

  6. Digressing for a moment back to Syria and related to the last video above – the human aspect

    Asma al Assad meets with children of Syria’s fallen soldiers

    Lady Asma meeting mothers of kidnapped soldiers on Mother’s Day in Syria

    • Every interview or documentary of Asma has always left me impressed with the lady. Assad really knew what he was doing when he married her.

      Thankfully, things are turning around in Syria, but then ((they)) seem to have alternative ways of advancing the chaos. This latest Iran/Iraq caper is likely to produce more blow-back/resolve than ((they)) realize.

  7. Re Wesley Clark’s memo recollection in 2007, recall also that one of the chief architects of ‘9-11’, Ehud Barak, was positioned in the BBC studios ready to be interviewed within an hour of the WTC demolitions.

    On that very morning, as ‘9-11’ was unfolding, Barak was calling for pre-emptive strikes against “rogue states – there are five of them – Iran, Iraq, Libya, [?Syria must have slipped his mind but wait for it …] and North Korea …”

    From around 7:60

  8. How to figure this all out? X22 Report. Did Obama prevent a previous assassination attempt?
    ***https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uIYhX9wNdyk

  9. It was before my time so someone may enlighten me.
    Was it not Adolf Hitler who dressed up a few prisoners in Polish uniform, had them shot claiming they were attacking a German radio outpost with a false flag event and then bombed the crap out of the Poles the next day?
    Then he invaded a heap of other countries soon after and Bob Menzies told us that he had a ‘melancholy duty’ to tell us that we are at war with Germany.
    Bugger, must have just been a dream, but the sacificed Aussie soldiers keep appearing and telling me that I am not dreaming.
    Maybe I am not dreaming, John Winston Howard joined in the bombing of Afghanistan, again based on a false flag attack, then went ‘All the Way’ (!) In invading Iraq, again another load of bs based on imaginery weapons of mass destruction.
    Oh, not much changes, murderers, betrayal and thieves have existed on a mere 30 pieces of silver for, well before my time.

      • Who financed Judas? Babylon (Rome) via the Sanhedrin.Babylon is still controlling us today which is why Trump is doing what Trump is doing.

        As Jesus warned us all about, but many still do not listen.

      • Who financed Judas?
        Well he was Jesus’ treasurer so………………….

        What interests me is that he was hand-picked to fulfill a certain role.
        In the same way as apostate Judah(the modern State of Israel) will be unwittingly used to glorify God

    • Ned – I’ve been trying to figure this out also.

      Here is a good place to start specifically:

      ”Why Germany Invaded Poland” – John Wear (Inconvenient History)
      https://inconvenienthistory.com/11/1/6391

      and a definitely recommended read for the broader picture:

      “The Bad War” – Mike (M.S.) King 2015 (link to pdf for download)
      http://c-cluster-110.uploads.documents.cimpress.io/v1/uploads/a7586e33-21f0-4fee-8151-8c1c601d8a31~110/original?tenant=vbu-digital

      Some research into the Katyn Forest massacre of up to 22,000 Polish military officers and intelligentsia carried out by the Soviet Union is also essential.

      • Julius – you’ll need to research who invented Communism and put such an ideology to the test in Paraguay back in the 16th Century, before you can fully understand how such a demonic ideology could gain such a foothold amongst Humanity finally merging into the catastrophe of socialism in all its forms during the 20th Century.

        The Jesuits, but not limited to them, would be a good place to start.

    • Ned, a couple of titles I came across in my archives that you might be able to find online.

      Red Famine: Stalin’s War on Ukraine (Anne Applebaum – 2017)

      From the Preface:

      “The warning signs were ample. By the early spring of 1932, the peasants of Ukraine were beginning to starve. Secret police reports and letters from the grain-growing districts all across the Soviet Union – the North Caucasus, the Volga region, western Siberia – spoke of children swollen with hunger; of families eating grass and acorns; of peasants fleeing their homes in search of food. In March a medical commission found corpses lying on the street in a village near Odessa. No one was strong enough to bury them. In another village local authorities were trying to conceal the mortality from outsiders. They denied what was happening, even as it was unfolding before their visitors’ eyes.

      Some wrote directly to the Kremlin, asking for an explanation:

      *"Honourable Comrade Stalin, is there a Soviet government law stating that villagers should go hungry? Because we, collective farm workers, have not had a slice of bread in our farm since January 1 … How can we build a socialist peoples’ economy when we are condemned to starving to death, as the harvest is still four months away? What did we die for on the battlefronts? To go hungry, to see our children die in pangs of hunger?"* … “

      Execution by Hunger: The Hidden Holocaust (Miron Dolot – 1985)

      From the Author’s Note:

      “THE POLICY of compulsory collectivization introduced at the end of 1929, called for all farms to be collectivized, and the **farmers to be firmly bound to the collectives just as they used to be bound as serfs to the feudal estates some seventy years before**. [I must try and condense what Solzhenitsyn had to say about this situation some time.]

      The farms were collectivized, but not without struggle. The farmers fiercely resisted the collectivization efforts. They clung to their plots of land and their possessions for dear life, and the struggle became one for life or death. But unarmed, disorganized, and leaderless, the farmers were no match for government forces. They were crushed mercilessly. Their villages were ruined and depopulated. Millions died. Many were sent to concentration camps, or banished from their villages to God-forsaken northern regions, and still others simply disappeared mysteriously, without a trace. Those who survived swallowed their pride and finally joined the collective farms in order to save themselves and their families. Thus the battle came to an end: the farmers lost and the Communists triumphed. Within only a few years—four in all!—the traditional patterns of village life were destroyed.”

      In mentioning these I am reminded of what Trotsky said as revealed by the declassification of Soviet documents and quoted in ”Secondhand Time: The Last of the Soviets” (Svetlana Alexievich – 2013):

      N G Kuznetsov to Trotsky (1919): “Moscow is literally dying of hunger”

      Trotsky [aka Lev Bronstein]: “That’s not hunger. […] When I have your mothers eating their young, then you can tell me you’re starving.”

      • Julius,
        25 years ago, did contract job for butcher come developer on 9 townhouses. Last claim owing me 12k, he said, “I wouldn’t even pay my mother.” Got in his merc and drove off. Never saw him again.
        There were many jobs like that.
        Going to court was even worse. I won at court, never saw the money owed (these days a house) and still had to pay legal costs. Don’t despair every day is a blessing.

  10. AUGUST 31, 1939
    JEWISH-POLISH GUERILLAS ATTACK GERMAN RADIO STATION
    Overestimating their strength, underestimating German strength, and knowing that France and the UK would now be forced to back them, Polish-Jewish terrorists cross the border and attack a German radio station in Silesia, Germany. It is actually the latest in a string of deliberate border instigations against Germany.

    The “Poles” then broadcast a message (in Polish) urging others to take up arms and start attacking Germans. German police quickly arrive and retake the station, killing one of the Red terrorists. Jewish Red terrorists, their Polish government protectors, and their Globalist-Zionist masters have picked a fight with Germany!

    Modern historians claim that the Gleiwitz incident was staged by Germans dressed as Polish terrorists. But as is the case with the Reichstag Fire conspiracy theory, they offer no evidence, (beyond a forced “confession” obtained after the war) to support this theory – a theory that ignores the outrageous and repeated pattern of provocations directed at Hitler’s Germany ever since 1933, the numerous border incidents, and also Hitler’s sincere attempts to negotiate a fair resolution to the Corridor and Danzig controversies.
    Soon after broadcasting a call to kill Germans, Polish-Jewish partisans, with the blessing of the Polish government, kicked off the war between Poland and Germany.

    “I lived in Germany during the 1980’s when many people who lived during the war were still alive. I sought out anyone who lived near Poland in 1939 and was lucky enough to meet several people. One was a customs official who said it was so bad on the border they were armed and also had grenades in their office ready for attacks. Another told me his farm animals were often stolen by Polish (Jewish?) terrorists. Another told of his niece being raped by a Pole (Jew?) who crossed the border. He told me in 1940 they caught the man and showed me a copy of the death order signed by Heydrich, in which he ordered the man put to death.

    This is just one of many stories told to me by German civilians who witnessed these border incursions just like had happened in 1919-1928. One thing many people fail to see is that Poland openly attacked Germany right after World War I, which led to many border battles. Once Germany started pressing Poland to work out a solution to the corridor, the attacks started again. And one thing that is clear to me is that Germany did not make up these attacks.”

    G.H. Ohio, USA
    http://tomatobubble.com/worldwarii.html

  11. Sorry but to say Trump is fulfilling Wesley-Clark’s prediction with this strike is fatuous. Firstly, Trump has resisted MIC/Deep State Hawks and at least hasn’t started any new wars. Clearly Trump himself is not part of the Deep State/MIC and has been at war with them since his election. Secondly he did not invade Iran but took out leaders in response to the attempted Bengazi-style storming of the US Embassy.
    Of course it begs the question – should the US be in Iraq at all? No – in my humble opinion. The pretence to invade Iraq was the MIC/Deep State PNAC “new Pearl Harbor” operation. But the reality is that they are there now and we need to deal with that reality.
    What worries me is that we in the dissident right become so contrarian that we find in everything a conspiracy. What happened here is that Iran backed militias tried to storm the US Embassy as they did in Benghazi. An embassy is a country’s sovereign territory. If successful they would likely have tortured and murdered the officials there as they did to Ambassador Stephens in Benghazi. Then Khameini taunted Trump on Twitter that he couldn’t do anything about it. Well he did something about it. He took out his top military leaders. Excellent, aggressive 2D chess!
    Having said that, if there is a conspiracy to be found here, the Embassy attack may have been a joint Iran/MIC/Deep State provocation to hurt Trump 2020 like it did to Jimmy Carter in 1979. However, Trump showed he is not a weakling like Carter. Neither is he a crypto-Muslim like Obama or a psychopath like Hillary. Trump has shown restraint but also toughness. Top job i say.

    • Richard, Quote, “An embassy is a country’s sovereign territory. ” Unquote. L.O.L. Really ???
      How well was that claim respected in the U.S. when the the U.S. Military raided the Russian’s Embassy and kicked them all out ???????????? Clearly, what your saying in regards to Embassies does not apply in the U.S.

      • There may be an argument that embassy property/land is not sovereign, but there is exemption/immunity from local law and permission required from hosting nation to enter. Different countries have different systems of land ownership. So it is effectively sovereign yes. If it is not US territory, why did locals have to “storm” it to try to enter? And what is your point? Are you critical of Trump? If so say why, rather than nit-pick me.

    • Richard, if you will allow me to nit-pick you (I’m only doing it because I like your comment), I would say the embassy since the time of construction was well understood to be a “base” (as in military base) and the US interest would run far beyond normal diplomatic stuff (what diplomatic stuff), so if Pompeo even went as far as giving Trump some options then Trump may have picked the least murderous … but who knows what really went on, quite likely they just gave him a script to read out.

  12. Zbigniew Brzezinski (professor at Columbia Univetrsity) who said “the Katyn Massacre was the biggest crime” in the video above, is the man who wrote Between Two Ages: America’s Role in the Technetronic Era. In his book, Between Two Ages, Brzezinski wrote: p97 [The technetronic era] involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled and directed society. Such a society would be dominated by an elite whose claim to political power would rest on allegedly superior scientific know-how. Unhindered by the restraints of traditional liberal values, this elite would not hesitate to achieve its political ends by using the latest modern techniques for influencing public behaviour and keeping society under close surveillance and control.
    p246 – the nation-state as a fundamental unit of man’s organized life has ceased to be the principal creative force: International banks and multinational corporations are acting and planning in terms that are far in advance of the political concepts of the nation-state.
    Brzezinski and David Rockefeller jointly formed the elitist group called the Trilateral Commission in order to create a “New International Economic Order”.
    Patrick Wood, an authority on Sustainable Development aka Technocracy states in his book Technocracy Rising The Trojan Horse of Global Transformation, p9, “[Antony] Sutton and I wrote extensively on Brzezinski’s philosophy and conclusions as revealed in Between Two Ages, but neither of us had any inkling that the word “Technetronic” might have been a knockoff for the word “Technocratic”.
    Patrick in his book Technocracy Rising, states that Brzezinski was the guiding light of foreign policy in the Carter administration, p52. Also, “Brzezinski had more than continued the policies of befriending our enemies and alienating our friends…eg: since early 1977 “normalized” relations with Communist China, Cuba, the USSR, Eastern European nations”…
    p 63 states: In 1972 Zbigniew Brzezinski even called for a Constitutional Convention to change the fabric of America but the suggstion was rejected by the public as outrageous and dangerous.

    Brzezinski was a Zionist Polish Catholic (it has been stated at his death) thus he understood conquest of the world by an elite said to be a superior people. Globalism, Zionism, Polish and Russian Jewish activities connect through the history of the world wars with so much bloodshed.

    • The cherry on top of all that trilateral stuff was HWBush’s chilling “New World Order” speech, for anyone who has forgotten, he intoned something like “when we succeed, and we will succeed”…
      When the Islamics in Iran etc talk about the “great satan” I think they can find evidence quite easily to support their position.
      Everyone in the world should get electric cars and solar panels just to try to extract ourselves from some of this, personally I am hanging onto my old LPG powered car in the meantime.

  13. Have to respectfully disagree with your view on international law. Having been a practitioner in this area for 35 years I can reassure you that it both exists and is a vital component of the international legal system. Frankly, the system of international trade, let alone a host of other areas would collapse without an appropriate legal system to govern and direct developments. The fact that some countries, notably the US and Israel, are serial violaters does not render the system obsolete.
    If there was more accountability for the actions of States the world would be a better and safer place.

    • James, I’ll bend to he extent of recognizing “private law.” E.g., voluntary cooperation re contract-and-sale. But not public law as there is no one to enforce it.

      Would you agree that the 1998 “Rome treaty” — that resulted in the International Criminal Court — is a bad joke?

      What about the US arming both sides in the 1980-88 Iran-Iraq war. Did that offend any international statute?

      Or what of the 1979 hostage crisis mentioned in this column. To grab a bunch of embassy personnel is a pretty direct violation of the Vienna Convention. Was there any “international’ muscle to release those (mainly CIA) hostages?

      You say “If there was more accountability for the actions of States the world would be a better and safer place.” That’s what my article is about. We need enforcement of domestic law, or even, as I said, enforcement of constitutional separation of powers — but I assure you the US Supreme Court dodges its responsibility in that area 100%). See Massachusetts v Laird. It’s outrageous.

      Here in the US, as in Australia — think Julie Bishop, George Brandis — the govt does not feel pressure from the people. Might makes right, period. I, like you, am opposing that.

      Where do international law practitioners stand on 9-11? Have they ever published anything on that fandangle?

      Does international law have any effect on the overseas child-trafficking trade? If you can cite even one case, please do.

    • Depends what you mean by “law”: So far as I’m concerned it’s a consensus that defines nationhood.
      That’s a completely different kettle of fish to treaties, ententes or other mutually beneficial deals

      • The only “international law” that’s enforceable is the law of the jungle, i. e. “if you can’t defend it you don’t own it”. Seems like the inhabitants of Israel and Aus have got a common gripe in that regard

  14. The Iranian general taken out in Baghdad by the American military was responsible for the Benghazi Embassy attack. He was also planning an attack on Washington DC, London and the Vatican with nuclear devices.

    That is why he was killed.

    Mary, you’re off with the fairies!

  15. “He was also planning an attack on Washington DC, London and the Vatican with nuclear devices.”

    Nem, where did you get this information? Got any links?

  16. HR 608 was a bill introduced to the House in 2017 by Reps Gabbard, Welch, Massie, Lee, Jones, Garrett, and Yoho. It “prohibits the use of funds to provide covered assistance” to al Qaeda or ISIL.” (2) COVERED ASSISTANCE.—The term “covered assistance” means—
    (A) defense articles, defense services, training or logistical support, or any other military assistance provided by grant, loan, credit, transfer, or cash sales;
    (B) intelligence sharing; or
    (C) cash assistance.
    (3) DEFENSE ARTICLES AND DEFENSE SERVICES.—The terms “defense articles” and “defense services” have the meanings given such terms in sections 47(3) and 47(4) of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2794 note), respectively.”
    Rand Paul introduced the companion bill in the senate. All 535 congresspersons should have been glad to support it, no? So why didn’t they?

  17. Great article Mary .

    As for your list of Presidents who you speculate were / are carrying out orders from above , I have no disagreement there – other than for one ( & it’s not Trump ).
    Because there’s a deluge of evidence confirming Trump’s the most compliant Zio-puppet in the history of the Republic, having delivered on all requests from Israel & the Zio-Military-Security complex (with added compound interest ) .

    I’m not so sure that Nixon was controlled by the cabal for the last half or so of his tenure.
    Yes, he escalated the war in Vietnam in the early part of his Presidency but then de-escalated Cold War tensions by :

    1) Visiting China & re-established diplomatic & trade ties & in the process removed a high profile bogey-man which the military complex had been using as an excuse for an arms build up.

    2) Signed the SALT 1 treaty with the Soviets which entailed the significant reduction of each side’s nuclear arsenal.

    A lot of people are not aware of the JFK assassination / Watergate connection.

    The same entity were behind both assassinations – literally ( JFK ) & politically ( Nixon ).

    Said entity did what it had to do to remove these Presidents from office – as both were viewed as an existential threat to Israel.

    To quote Michael Collins Piper ( author of ‘ Final Judgement ‘ – the benchmark in JFK assassination research ) :

    The Dallas-Watergate Connection has been the basis for an
    incredible amount of misinformation and disinformation since the fall
    of Richard Nixon in 1974. There is indeed a Dallas-Watergate
    Connection—but it’s one that even the most intrepid JFK assassination
    researchers have somehow seemed to miss. The true Dallas-Watergate
    Connection is the long-hidden role of Israel’s CIA man, James Jesus
    Angleton—the prime CIA mover not only behind the JFK assassination
    but also the forced resignation of Richard M. Nixon.

    The reasons for Israel's hatred of Nixon are numerous, but here are a few ( also quotes from 'Final Judgement' ) :

    In light of what we now know about John F. Kennedy’s bitter conflict
    with Israel over its determined intent to develop a nuclear arsenal, it is quite
    interesting indeed to learn, according to journalist Leslie Cockburn, that
    “when Nixon came into office, the second thing he asked J. Edgar Hoover
    to do for him was ‘Get me the files on Israeli nuclear espionage.'”

    And …..

    Clearly, Nixon had big plans [ for his 2nd term ] : he was actually going to assert himself
    and attempt to gain control of the executive branch and its myriad agencies.
    This move, needless to say, made many in the American Jewish community
    uneasy. Rumors of Nixon’s “lists” of Jews in high-ranking positions in the
    executive branch and the agencies began circulating, adding fuel to the
    already long-standing suspicions of Nixon. And as all of this was taking
    place in the United States, events in the Middle East began to unfold that set
    a new tone to Israel’s perception of the American president.

    Also ….

    Following his massive 1972 re-election victory, Nixon crossed the line
    as far as his previous support for Israel was concerned. In 1973, the Nixon
    administration knew of the planned attack on Israel by Syria and Egypt
    thirty hours before the United States actually notified Israel.
    According to pro-Israel Nixon critics, John Loftus and Mark Aarons,
    Nixon’s staff “had at least two days advance warning that an attack was
    coming . . . but no one in the Nixon White House warned the Jews until the
    last few hours on the day of the attack.”

    Bottom Line : Nixon was not following the script so the cabal engineered an event ( Watergate ) with which to take him down – & CIA Kingpin James Jesus Angleton featured prominently ( utilising E. Howard Hunt & Frank Sturgis who had both been involved in JFK’s demise ) .

    • I tend to agree with all this about Nixon but Jews are not really more embedded than Anglo or German Americans. The thing over the mediterranean real-estate has been going on since the fall of the roman empire. Constantine, the crusaders, Mohammad, anyone wonders why the Kurds don’t get their own state, maybe it is because of Saladin over 1000 years ago.
      Words keep getting deliberately mangled, the average Jew is not really a Zionist, semite means Arab people not Jewish in particular, Israel does not mean Zion, the project of Israel as started by Rosthschilds after WW2 would have always expected to extend right up to south lebanon because of water security. Now a pipeline is mooted to bypass the persian gulf. It’s not really about the wider jewish public and I don’t know that the “truth” is well served by implicating the whole lot of them. btw I don’t have any Jewish blood or connection

  18. Correction to my last comment :

    I said that Trump is the most compliant Zio-puppet in the history of the Republic .

    I’m sure Nemesis & Richard will be happy to hear that I retract that statement.

    Trump ranks SECOND as far compliant Zio-puppets go .

    Because LBJ , of course, is far and away the most corrupt , conscience-free , devoid-of-integrity Zio puppet that ever drew breath.

    A hard act for Trump to follow but he’s working overtime to close the gap .

    • Stupid millennials. Totally reliant on their Iphones and panicking when there was no service. Using the phones to navigate, no map. Fleeing the U.S. because of ‘gun violence’. The fires are because of ‘Global warming’ and it is frightening…

      • A “reliance” that goes hand-in-glove with no understanding that:
        * Kids aged 2 – 4 are better entertained with a couple of cardboard boxes & a ball of string than being constantly plied with pre-fab toys & lollies.
        * Healthy adults can go without food for a week, and so far as dealing with a stressful situation, fasting works much better than stuffing one’s-self with takies.

        And I thought my generation were the ultimate consumerholics !

  20. AUNT ROZA SPEAKS.

    I just found an old item by Montse Alrcon Flix at Gumshoe. You really should read it. She lives in Catalonia. She quotes Jahar Tsarnaev’s aunt in the Russian federation:

    “The position of the Russian mass media, which supported the USA’s gangster policies (I emphasize the word “gangster”) in relation to this false Boston story, is totally incomprehensible. It is clear that the Americans are hatching their plan of unleashing [more] conflicts in the Caucasus and Central Asia.” — Roza Tsarnaeva

    Montse makes many interesting points about Syria, e.g.:

    “Syria has always been an example of religious tolerance. The non-confessional state that many countries have as an ideal, is, in Syria, real! For centuries it has been maintained even in the middle of the most atrocious wars.”

    htps://gumshoenews.com/2016/12/16/al-assad-the-caucasus-tsarnaev-and-a-grateful-heart/

  22. Military industrial is good for business.
    We know that our owners always finance all sides, cause wars are good for business.
    Yes, they are for the gulag controllers/collectors but for the 99% all wars are genocide.
    Tulsi knows that wars financially ruin destroy and murder common people worldwide. That’s why she says to bring the troops home.

    Currently we have our communist controlled government deliberately at war against the good people living on this land. They are enforcing their masters agenda. Scorched earth policy causing exponential sufferings to innocent victims – the real Australians – who by the fruits of their labour have been feeding us whilst getting shafted year to year.
    Now our handlers have decided they are not good enough by forcing mass evacuations from the land into the urban concentration camps.

    For all who have eyes, it is in our face, this land has been gifted to the ccp one world gulag. Our controllers/collectors are cold blooded reptiles.
    After fleecing us dry now they want us all dead.
    We never unlocked our shackles from colonialism and just like the original natives, it is now our turn to be ethnically cleansed.

    • I was just pondering – will we be subject to Noahide laws

      (‘Not all lives are equal”, apparently)
      https://www.bitchute.com/video/6hWkJJwzI4wJ/

      or have to learn Confucius, Sun Tzu, poetry ‘n stuff? – you know, stuff like “Respect yourself and others will respect you”, “The man who asks a question is a fool for a minute; the man who dos not ask is a fool for life”, ”Better to argue with a wise man than prattle with a fool”.

      Oh well – here is a “Let’s Study” song

      • The American Dream has become the CCP reality.
        George Carlin said,”you have to be asleep to believe it.”
        For the 100 million party members it was never a dream. Being above the debt/usury system their reality has been guaranteed.

        • This kinda’ puts our relevance in context – 220 million people in the Yangtze River Delta region

          Yangtze River Delta region accelerating integrated development

          Stock up on popcorn and proverbs.

  24. I have just received a call from our ‘source’

    ” The US did not knock out Soleimani, it was entirely an Israeli operation”

    He further said that Soleimani was in Iraq on invitation to negotiate some settlement.

    Now this has some logic in many aspects:
    – Soleimani was noted for fighting ISIS.
    – Some 5 or 6 Iraqis also killed.
    – Why would the top Iranian general be flying (openly) into Iraq
    – Also killed, Al-Muhandis (Iraqi born), who was born Jamal Jaafar Ibrahimi, was revered by many in Iraq for building an effective fighting force against the IS out of many militias
    – Who was supporting ISIS fighters? (and ISIS fighters landed up in Israeli hospitals.)

    The Q: why would Trump take the credit?

    • To avoid a war. If Iran knew that the Israelis had killed Soleimani then all Hell might break loose. Isn’t that what Trump said, he did it to avoid a war.

      When the Iranians do pay-back on America, then it opens another door for entry into a war on Iran. The Americans have already asked Iran to be ‘proportional’ in their response.

      I’m getting tired of all the deception.

  26. Agreed 56, people can hold to any views that seem right in their own minds until the light of truth dawns and helps them to see the error of their former ways – Prov 14:12 There is a way which seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death.

    Our own Vict premier Daniel Andrews is a self-described devout and practising Roman Catholic and the head of that religious institution is the Jesuit Pope Francis who went to address the UN to endorse the United Nations SDG for 2030.
    The UN programs tell it all. In JUNE 26, 1945 THE FOUNDING CHARTER FOR THE UNITED NATIONS WAS SIGNED IN SAN FRANCISCO. The U.N. replaced the League of Nations as the foundation of The New World Order. All 51 nations signing the original charter agreed to be bound by its articles. Australia was one signature and has since continued to co-operate with the UN organisation by implementing their policies, plan & objectives over and above our heads like a ever-speeding rolling ball in the areas of business, government and religion.

    It is growing more evident that the leaders of the world conspire together exalting themselves above the Lord’s Christ (Messiah) for achieving a great (supposedly) brotherhood of man ruled over and controlled by a superior group. They aspire for peace but do not know in their hearts what even a little child can receive and understand.

    This monument gives us all a clue that ancient history is a work in perpetuity. Please click on
    https://hawthornartistsociety.org/richard-stringer

  27. Yes Mary Maxwell , for those readers unfamiliar with the USS Liberty incident in 1967 , your link to a previous Gumshoe article is a must-read.

    Which brings me to that single adjective that best describes LBJ – TREASONOUS .

    LBJ is hands down the worst US President of all – there’s blue sky to second place .

    Yet, he never features on lists of worst POTUS’s .

    Hmmm … I wonder why that is. Could it have something to do with the ownership of the entirety of the MSM , publishing houses , over representation of key positions in academia by those of a particular ethnic / religious group ?

    • The short answer is No. The clue as to why is in the history of the Whitlam government. The day before he was to announce the closure of Pine Gap he was sacked by CIA asset, the then Governor General Kerr. No government since has dared to deviate from US wishes. Hence Australia’s endless involvement in US wars.

    • Déjà vu all over again … ?

      Peace Mission:

      Rudolf Hess’s peace mission comes to mind:

      In short, Rudolf Hess flew solo to England with a peace proposal (perhaps, if not probably, a proposal for an alliance with England against the bolsheviks who had taken over and decimated Russia and threatened the rest of Europe). Hess was incarcerated in solitary confinement (Julian Assange style) by Churchill/the British Establishment until he was murdered by British agents in Spandau Prison in 1987 at the age of 93 to prevent his ‘secrets’ being made public.

      On behalf of his handlers, the drunkard, whoremongering [sic] Churchill would have none of it and was determined to fulfil the Balfour Agreement no matter what the cost in human lives.

      A lengthy discussion by David Irving:

      David Irving Discusses Rudolf Hess (November 2013)
      https://www.bitchute.com/video/rT66GJ7gme7g/

      A pdf download – “Hess: The Missing Years 1941-1945” – David Irving
      http://www.fpp.co.uk/books/Hess/Hess.pdf

    • … Déjà vu continued

      Peace Letter:

      Hitler’s Sincere Peace Letter to French President
      http://tomatobubble.com/id723.html

      It is worth quoting this abridged text of the thoughtful and logical letter which Hitler wrote to French President Edouard Daladier [bold emphasis added]:

      (pdf for download copy here … )
      http://tomatobubble.com/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderfiles/hitdal93951142.pdf

      “My dear Minister President:

      I understand the misgiving to which you give expression. I, too, have never overlooked the grave responsibilities which are imposed upon those who are in charge of the fate of nations. As an old front line fighter, I, like yourself, know the horrors of war. Guided by this attitude and experience, I have tried to remove all matters that might cause conflict between our two peoples.

      I have quite frankly given one assurance to the French people, namely, that the return of the Saar would constitute the precondition for this. After its return I immediately and solemnly pronounced my renunciation of any further claims that might concern France. The German people approved of this, my attitude.

      As you could judge for yourself during your last visit here, the German people, in the knowledge of its own behavior held and holds no ill feelings, much less hatred, for its one-time brave opponent. On the contrary, the pacification of our western frontier led to an increasing sympathy. Certainly as far as the German people are concerned, a sympathy which, on many occasions, showed itself in a really demonstrative way.

      The construction of the western fortifications, which swallowed and still swallow many millions (of Marks) at the same time constituted for Germany a document of acceptance and fixation of the final frontiers of the Reich. In doing so, the German people have renounced two provinces which once belonged to the German Reich, later were conquered again at the cost of much blood, and finally were defended with even more blood.

      I believed that by this renunciation and this attitude every conceivable source of conflict between our two peoples that might lead to a repetition of the tragedy of 1914-1918 had been done away with.

      This voluntary limitation of the German claims to life in the West, can, however, not be interpreted as an acceptance of all other phases of the Versailles dictate. I have really tried, year after year, to achieve the revision of at least the most impossible and unbearable provisions of this dictate by way of negotiation. This was impossible.

      In this sense I have tried to remove from the world the most irrational provisions of the Versailles dictate. I have made an offer to the Polish government which shocked the German people. Nobody but myself could even dare go before the public with such an offer. It could therefore be made only once.

      I am deeply convinced that if, especially, England at that time had, instead of starting a wild campaign against Germany in the press and instead of launching rumors of a German mobilization, somehow talked the Poles into being reasonable, Europe today and for twenty-five years could enjoy a condition of deepest peace.

      As things were, Polish public opinion was excited by a lie about German aggression. Clear decisions that the situation called for were made difficult for the Polish government. Above all, the government’s ability to see the limitations of realistic possibilities was impaired by the guarantee promise that followed.

      The Polish government declined the proposals. Polish public opinion, convinced that England and France would now fight for Poland, began to make demands one might possibly stigmatize as laughable insanity were they not so tremendously dangerous. At that point an unbearable terror, a physical and economic persecution of the Germans although they numbered more than a million and a half began in the regions ceded by the Reich.

      I do not want to speak of the atrocities that occurred. Suffice it to say that Danzig, too, was made increasingly conscious through continuous aggressive acts by Polish officials of the fact that apparently it was delivered over to the high-handedness of a power foreign to the national character of the city and its population.

      **May I now take the liberty of putting a question to you, Herr Daladier: How would you act as a Frenchman if, through some unhappy issue of a brave struggle, one of your provinces severed by a corridor occupied by a foreign power? And if a big city – let us say Marseilles – were hindered from belonging to France and if Frenchmen living in this area were persecuted, beaten and maltreated, yes, murdered, in a bestial manner? **

      You are a Frenchman, Herr Daladier, and I therefore know how you would act. I am German, Herr Daladier. Do not doubt my sense of honor nor my consciousness of duty to act exactly like you. If, then, you had the misfortune that is ours, would you then, Herr Daladier, have any understanding that Germany was without cause to insist that the corridor through France remained, that the robbed territory must not be restored, and that the return of Marseilles be forbidden?

      Certainly I cannot imagine, Herr Daladier, that Germany would fight against you for this reason. For, I and all of us, have renounced Alsace-Lorraine in order to avoid further bloodshed. Much less would we shed blood in order to maintain an injustice that would as unbearable for you as it would be immaterial to us.

      Possibly we, as old front fighters, can best understand each other in a number of fields. I ask you, however, do understand this also: That *it is impossible for a nation of honor to renounce the claim of almost two million human beings and to them maltreated at its own borders**. I have therefore set up a clear demand to Poland. Danzig and the Corridor must return to Germany.

      I see no way of persuading Poland, which feels herself as unassailable, now that she enjoys the protection of her guarantees, to accept a peaceful solution. If our two countries on that account should be destined to meet again on the field of battle, there would nevertheless be a difference in the motives. I, Herr Daladier, shall be leading my people in a fight to rectify a wrong, whereas the others would be fighting to preserve that wrong.

      That is the more tragic since many important men, also among your own people, have recognized the insanity of the solutions then found (at Versailles) as also the possibility of maintaining it lastingly.

      That our two peoples should enter a new, bloody war of destruction is painful not only for you, but also for me, Herr Daladier. As already observed, I see no possibility for us on our part to exert influence in the direction of reasonableness upon Poland for correcting a situation that is unbearable for the German people and the German Reich.

      Adolf Hitler”

    • Thats why we invaded the place: Bring democracy, freedom and security to the people by ,letting them control their country’s resources.
      And keep us safe too!
      Now we can get out and hand out our medals.
      Maybe we might get Sir Winston Howard and Lady Janet? It will be her Majesty’s first appointment to the ‘Honourable Order of Fridge Magnets’, the motto being; ‘ be a Lert but not a Larmed’. (I think that is pigeon latin?)

  32. Thank you Julius for your information.
    I wanted to post about the economic turn-around of The German nation under Hitler and I compared this turn-around to our sad national economic system under technocracy and globalization today.
    Pls find: http://www.ihr.org/other/economyhitler2011.html

    Truth will make us free as we seek to find it, even in history. Called a Nazi when I was a teenager I had no idea what this meant. Today after researching family history and being a christian observing the changes in our churches (Zionism is one) and reading from other researchers, I am quite content to think that it is true that Germany did not start the world wars, as I was told by others.

    I read 2 books by Thomas Goodrich Hellstorm and Summer, 1945…which will turn anyone away from making war.

    • “the economic turn-around of The German nation under Hitler”

      Talk about topical discussion – Mike King of Tomatobubble / Real History has just posted this.

      Why Did Hitler Invade the Soviet Union?

      https://www.realhistorychannel.org/new-page-(rename)

      That speech is contained in the link below – albeit a subtly different grammatical translation, for example:

      “After long months when I was forced to keep silent, despite heavy concerns, the time has come when I can finally speak openly.”

      “The hour has finally come for me, weighed down by heavy burdens and sentenced to remain silent for months, to speak openly.“

      Adolf Hitler – proclamation to the German folk
      – June 22, 1941

      See also his address
      Adolf Hitler – speech to the German Reichstag
      – September 1, 1939

      https://archive.org/details/AdolfHitlerCollectionOfSpeeches19221945

      I also urge readers to also read the very first speech:

      Adolf Hitler – speech in Munich
      – April 12, 1922

      “at the end of the World War Germany was burdened with her own debt of some 7 or 8 milliards of marks and beyond that was faced with the debts of ‘the rest of the world’ – the so-called ‘reparations’.”

      This one statement underpins Hitler’s essential motivation to achieve fairness and justice for the German people. The Danzig and Sudetenland questions just added grievous physical injury to insult.

  33. Thank you Ally, and with mutual appreciation. We keep gathering and sharing these little pebbles of truth. This knowledge is all quite new to me so I am coming from a position of recent awakening, and it begins to explain EVERYTHING! I have watched the documentary “Hellstorm” based on Goodrich’s book (I have those books but not yet read), and various other masterpieces like TGSNT.

    Hot off the press – a brilliant and short article by Bill Willers (it was reposted by Aletho News this morning) with deserved reference to and acknowledgement of a certain Caitlin Johnstone.

    https://dissidentvoice.org/2020/01/some-war-truth-in-a-single-photograph/

    It begins with the quote from Ron Unz:

    “Once I realized to my dismay that I couldn’t believe a word of what our media and political leaders said about major events in the here and now, their credibility on controversial happenings so long ago and far away entirely disappeared.”

    — Ron Unz, 2018

    Of David Irving, Willers writes:

    “He [David Irving] writes that many details in the generally-accepted history of WW II, apparently like much of history itself, are simply wrong. His depiction of Winston Churchill is as a central causative agent of both world wars. What’s that? you say! Churchill, during his lifetime considered the greatest living Englishman, a war monger?”

  34. Very interesting pick ups Julius.

    1) EU > The Marshal Scam’s OEEC (Image 1) consists of 18 nations. It is the embryo which will eventually grow into the European Common Market, and then the European Union (Image 2)
    http://tomatobubble.com/id193.html

    2) the bull > the bull, the serpent, the ivy are signs of Greek mythology and relate (from your pasted link) to the sensual, spontaneous, and emotions

    Other instances of the bull/calf are:
    Exodus 32:7-8 7 And the Lord said unto Moses, Go, get thee down; for thy people, which thou broughtest out of the land of Egypt, have corrupted themselves:
    8 They have turned aside quickly out of the way which I commanded them: they have made them a molten CALF, and have worshipped it, and have sacrificed thereunto, and said, These be thy gods, O Israel, which have brought thee up out of the land of Egypt. (PS: The Torah however is not the Judaicic Talmud (oral law))
    Markuk [young bull of the Sun] was late generation god of ancient Mesopotamia and patron deity of the city of Babylon from c18th BC. Marduk became god of magic/Bel/Baal,Depicted with bow, arrows, mace, lightning, flame.
    syncretistic evolution of Nandi bull of Shiva
    Nimrod was called the Horned-one.
    Rsabha founder of Jainism associated with bull; symbol is the bull Sanskrit c1st BC
    (All this late research because of Messianic Judaism)

  35. Mary > “run out of food soon”
    I think it was 56 and Phil’s thread re the MDBA and Mekong River connection, so further to this:

    Trilateral Commissioner Quentin Grafton, UNESCO Chair in Water Economics and Transboundary Water Governance in Australia, for Asia and Pacific (https://en.unesco.org/themes/water-security/chairs) directs the Water Justice Hub

    It will have a primary focus on Australian justice (esp.for First Peoples) and will also respond to the global challenges of delivering ‘water for all’ fulfilling Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 6.

    FE2W Network (Food/Energy/Environment/Water Network) is Quentin’s work too, which will educate, collaborate, facilitate, determine outcomes for poverty reduction, sustainable livelihoods, and maintain critical ecosystem services dealing with RISKS and SHOCKS across the FOOD, Energy, Environment, WATER systems.

    And here we find reference to what 56 said about MDB and Mekong > In the first operational phase of the FE2W Network’s operations we will focus on six regions: Colorado Basin (United States), Ganges-Brahmaputra-Meghna Basin (South Asia), MEKONG Basin (South-East Asia), MURRAY-DARLING Basin (Australia), Nile Basin (East Africa), and Volta Basin (West Africa).
    https://waterjusticehub.org/initiatives/fe2w-network/

    There’s more truth (to me) in this statement that those above (some may differ) >

    “The nation does not live for the sake of the economic system, and the economic system does not exist for the sake of capital. On the contrary, capital is the servant of the economic system and the economic system is the servant of the people.” Adolf Hitler

    Since the outbreak of the French Revolution, the world has been moving with ever increasing speed toward a new conflict, the most extreme solution of which is called Bolshevism, whose essence and aim, however, are solely the elimination of those strata of mankind which have hitherto provided the leadership and their replacement by worldwide Jewry. No state will be able to withdraw or even remain at a distance from this historical conflict. It is not the aim of this memorandum to prophesy the time when the untenable situation in Europe will become an open crisis. I only want, in these lines, to set down my conviction that this crisis cannot and will not fail to arrive and that it is Germany’s duty to secure her own existence by every means in face of this catastrophe, and to protect herself against it, and that from this compulsion there arises a series of conclusions relating to the most important tasks that our people have ever been set. For a victory of Bolshevism over Germany would not lead to a Versailles treaty, but to the final destruction, indeed the annihilation of the German people.

    At present we see our country Australian staggering under sharing our resources, land, wealth within a global community; but perhaps our leaders will see the consequences…make Australia great again! (gotta have hope)

    • They say “the winner’s write history:
      –> https://www.bitchute.com/video/2AuypcHCeC2m/

      EUROPA – The Last Battle ~ The Full Documentary (2017)

      After World War Two, the victors of the war not only went on to write our history books, infiltrate our media and public education but even going so far as to criminalize the mere questioning of the official story’s orthodoxy. The truth is, that our world today can only be understood through a correct understanding of World War II, the architects of it and the conflicts between Globalism and Nationalism. Between the old and new world order. The Traditional and the “Progressive”.

      –> https://europathelastbattle.wordpress.com/watch/

      Part1: –> https://www.bitchute.com/video/QtLvxZ9d0yEY/

      Communism was not created by the masses to overthrow the bankers, Communism was created by the bankers to overthrow and enslave the masses.

    • … And just when I was beginning to believe in something called “international law” (please feel free to elaborate, MM/JO)

      Trump: You’re not going to need an exit strategy

      Oh dear – and this is the leader of the free world.

      I trust he has been well rewarded and reassured.

      Is what we are witnessing reflective of this widely quoted statement.

      *“If we get caught they will just replace us with persons of the same cloth. So it does not matter what you do, America is a golden calf and we will suck it dry, chop it up, and sell it off piece by piece until there is nothing left but the world’s biggest welfare state that we will create and control. Why? Because it is the will of God, and America is big enough to take the hit so we can do it again and again and again. This is what we do to countries that we hate. We destroy them very slowly and make them suffer for refusing to be our slaves.”*

      Benjamin Netanyahu 1990

      (Cited as corroborated here …
      https://www.veteranstoday.com/2019/07/08/intel-drop-the-fbi-and-vt-the-children-of-a-strange-marriage/)

  38. This [Soleimani] event and the related commentary is certainly sorting out the wheat from the chaff.

    Several sites that I have subscribed to and have produced what I have appreciated as worthwhile articles in the past have suddenly gone solidly on the “I’m with Trump – not these terrorist savages” band wagon. They seem to have forgotten about ISIS and Shimon Elliot [sic] – I mean Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi. Even trusted sites can be drawn into error by not perusing and fact checking referenced articles closely enough.

    One such article is this otherwise ‘excellent’ debunking article by Craig Murray

    Lies, the Bethlehem Doctrine, and the Illegal Murder of Soleimani

    https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2020/01/lies-the-bethlehem-doctrine-and-the-illegal-murder-of-soleimani/

    (I caught it re-posted on Fort Russ and then it was cited by Caitlin Johnstone)

    A couple of passages from Murray’s article:

    “The truth of the matter is that if you take every American killed including and since 9/11, in the resultant Middle East related wars, conflicts and terrorist acts, well over 90% of them have been killed by Sunni Muslims financed and supported out of Saudi Arabia and its gulf satellites, and less than 10% of those Americans have been killed by Shia Muslims tied to Iran.”

    “Yet every journalist or aid worker hostage who has been horribly beheaded or otherwise executed has been murdered by a Sunni, every jihadist terrorist attack in the USA itself, including 9/11, has been exclusively Sunni, the Benghazi attack was by Sunnis, Isil are Sunni, Al Nusra are Sunni, the Taliban are Sunni and the vast majority of US troops killed in the region are killed by Sunnis.

    Some truths scattered about, but quite frankly, I think he is an opportunist (at best) trying to covertly sew division and confusion whilst obscuring the real “truth of the matter”.

    and check this out – Murray goes on …

    “… But there is zero evidence, as the 9/11 report specifically stated [believe that report], that the Iranians knew what they were planning, or that Soleimani personally was involved. This is total bullshit. 9/11 was Sunni and Saudi led, nothing to do with Iran.”

    See how it works? Tread carefully.

  41. Skoolafish , thanks for the letter you posted ( from Hitler to Daladier ) – an enlightening read.

    It’s great how you quote David Irving – the most outstanding WW 2 historian that ever lived , a man who’s been demonised (unjustifiably ) from pillar to post like no other by the rabid Zionist wing of the Jewish Lobby .

    In the kangaroo court that smeared David Irving's reputation ( aka the ' Lipstadt Trial ) , the presiding judge treated Irving very shoddily (was obviously put up to it by his Zio-controllers to make certain that Irving did not get a fair trial ) .

    That said, the judge went on to make this inescapable conclusion about Irving :

    ‘ As a military historian , Irving has much to commend him . He has discovered & disclosed to historians and others many documents which , but for his efforts , might have remained unnoticed for years .
    It was plain from the way in which he conducted his case and dealt with a sustained and penetrating cross-examination that his knowledge of World War Two is unparalleled .

    His mastery of the detail of the historical documents is remarkable ' . ........

    ……Sir Charles Gray QC .

    I commend you for mentioning Ron Unz ( who prepares The Unz Review at : www,unz,com ).

    For GumShoe readers not familiar with Unz , Paul Craig Roberts has alled him the bravest man alive.
    He’s a Jewish guy that is extremely well researched & not afraid to tackle issues that others dare not broach .

    An amazing man .

    Ally, it's so important how you mention the likes of Jewish financiers Bernard Baruch & Sth African mining magnate Henry Strakosch who financed Churchill's profligate lifestyle in the lead up to his becoming Prime Minister. ( Hmmm .... in exchange for some form of quid pro quo perhaps when he became P.M ? ) .

    Strakosch loaned Churchill 20,000 pounds in Feb. 1938 to pay off his debts.
    That was an enormous sum of money at the time & needs to be put in context – many workers in Britain at that time earned 30 shillings ( 1.5 pounds ) a week or less ( 78 pounds per year ) .

    If only British school children were taught the truth about Churchill ( one of the 20th century's great war criminals , directly responsible for the deaths of hundreds of 1000's of British & Commonwealth soldiers & civilians in WW 2 alone - not to mention the millions he starved in India through famine ) , they'd ditch their Extinction Rebellion protests & instead campaign to have his ugly noggin removed from the their 5 pound note :

    https://www.google.com/search?sxsrf=ACYBGNQCmEH70OLpEey6vDcpIXA4eOWFHw:1578376063697&q=churchill+on+5+pound+polymer+note&tbm=isch&source=univ&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiy2eSE5fDmAhWTb30KHTOOBE8QsAR6BAgJEAE&biw=1024&bih=653#imgrc=gQjRDHV-FR8xZM

    Winston Churchill was truly a despicable & corrupt coward of a drunkard .

  42. Correction to my post above : Churchill was NOT loaned 20,000 pounds by his Zionist benefactor in 1938..
    He was GIFTED this amount ( he never paid it back – nor was he ever under the impression that he had to ) .

  43. Vanessa Beeley has been bringing us the truth about Syria in particular since the beginning (before I even woke up). (Eva K Bartlett is another extraordinary woman of courage and integrity, as you know by now.)

    Vanessa brings us this one-minute clip

    General Qasem Soleimani saved Christian lives in Syria

  48. Pardon if this has been mentioned before.

    Btw, Iran and North Korea are two of the only countries left without a Rothschild owned central bank or a grand Freemason lodge, so now they are being targeted just like Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Lybia, and all of Israels other enemies.

  49. Good stuff Danny . Most Australians won’t be aware of that information.

    Even for those Gumshoe readers that are familiar with those facts , it’s important that we hear them again so that we never lose sight of the malfeasance within the western financial system.

C'mon Leave a Reply, Debate and Add to the Discussion

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.