by James O’Neill*
One of the most difficult questions for the foreign observer to answer is: what is the reason for Australia’s addiction to United States foreign wars? History provides some insights. For the first 180 years of its existence as part of the British Empire, there was rarely a question asked about Australia’s involvement in foreign wars of choice.
Australian troops fought on behalf of British settlers against the indigenous Maori population in New Zealand’s colonial wars of the late 18th and early 19th centuries. Australians were similarly involved on behalf of their British masters in South Africa. The so-called First World War had Australian troops fighting the Germans in Europe and the Turks in the Middle East although one will struggle long and hard for the least evidence either country posed a realistic threat to Australia. This is, even more, a case in the light of recently released documents showing that the United Kingdom began planning for a war with Germany 20 years before it began because the role of the newly unified German State was perceived as a threat to the United Kingdom’s worldwide empire.
The Second World War more legitimately posed a perceived threat to Australia’s national interests, not from the old foe of Germany, but an aggressive Japan who didn’t excite western interest with its rape and carnage of Korea and China, but only elicited a response when it attacked Pearl Harbor. Even that may be seen as a defensive measure by Japan that was suffering from American sanctions.
We also now know that Pearl Harbor was not a surprise as the Americans had broken the Japanese code and had advance notice of the attack. As a consequence, the warships in Pearl Harbor were mostly outdated members of the US fleet.
That attack and the fate of Singapore had the effect of Australia transferring its allegiance from reliance on British support to that of the United States. That allegiance has remained intact ever since. The major threat to US dominance of Australian foreign policy, of which joining the wars in Korea and Vietnam were obvious symptoms of obedience, was the Labor government of Gough Whitlam (1972-1975) pulling Australian troops out of Vietnam, recognising the People’s Republic of China as China’s legitimate government and threatening to close the major United States spy base at Pine Gap.
The coup d’état of November 1975 did more than remove a democratically elected government. It gave an unmistakable message to the Australian political class that independence and foreign policy was subject to the overwhelming need to be in alliance with the Americans.
Since that 1975 coup, Australian foreign policy has essentially been a reflection of United States foreign policy. This has taken many forms. Most obviously it may be seen in Australia joining the United States wars of choice in Afghanistan (2001 and still there), Iraq (2003 and still there), and Syria (2015 and still there).
All three of these wars are not only illegal in terms of international law. None of them could be said to remotely threaten Australia’s national interests. What is even more astonishing is that none of these wars are the subject of Parliamentary scrutiny or even public debate. The mainstream media are conspicuously silent with the sole exception in recent weeks of the ABC reporting on the alleged war crimes of one of Australia’s highly decorated soldiers, currently the subject of defamation proceedings by that soldier.
As to the rest of Australia’s role in Afghanistan, there is complete silence. Of the list of things never to be mentioned is the role played by so-called Allied troops in protecting the cultivation of the poppy fields, source of 90% of the world’s heroin and a major source of off the books CIA income.
Why the silence? Presumably, the media barons do not approve of this large-scale illicit activity. It is perhaps best interpreted as an expression of loyalty to the United States alliance. Nothing to be said or done to embarrass Australia’s great ally by pointing out that in addition to being the world’s greatest killing machine through its constant wars, it also contributes to the world heroin disease rates by being responsible for distributing the overwhelming bulk of the deadly heroin crop.
It is not as if this information is buried in classified reports protected by espionage laws and official secrets acts. The figures are published annually by the United Nations for all the world to read.
The Trump administration is currently waging a propaganda war against China, accompanied by highly provocative naval exercises, with two aircraft carriers and their accompanying flotilla, in the South China Sea. The Australian media faithfully parrot the ritual excuse of ensuring freedom of navigation in one of the world’s busiest sea lanes. The complete absence of any evidence of Chinese interference with civilian shipping is completely ignored.
Similarly not deemed worthy of mention by the Australian media is the fact that the South China Sea is a depository of a vast quantity of undersea oil and gas reserves. As is so often the case, what was not told is more important and what was publicly said and this is a classic example.
There are legitimate and unresolved issues in the South China Sea, including the extent of China’s territorial claims. Whatever foundation they may have had in centuries long past, they did not sit comfortably with modern concepts of territorial waters and accompanying rights to resource exploitation of those waters.
Another contemporaneous example of Australia acting in United States interests to its own great potential detriment is the extraordinarily stupid conduct of the Australian government (with the complicity of the alleged Opposition) in going out of its way to annoy its most important trading partner, China.
Again, one looks in vain for a rational explanation as to why Australia is engaging in these acts of economic suicide. The only explanation that makes sense, in a rather weird way, is that Australia is again following the dictates of the United States.
To describe this conduct as economic suicide is not an overstatement. China is Australia’s most important economic partner by a very large margin. Replacing that relationship, while not impossible, is not something that can be achieved in the short or even medium term.
While the government has its share of rabidly anti-China hawks, those same people are notably silent on the question of suggesting viable alternatives to Australia’s economic relationship with China. It seems too kind to describe them as profoundly stupid and short-sighted.
A pessimist might suggest that the current state of affairs, from illegal wars, breaches of international laws, and a total disregard of what constitutes a country’s real interests, is only the inevitable consequence of decades of slavish adherence to the world’s greatest serial offender on all counts, the United States.
The sad truth is that the said pessimist is, in fact, the realist.
*Geopolitical analyst. He may be contacted at jamesoneill83@icloud.com
Thanks James. One has to watch undersea mining developments.
This from FORBES:
$771 trillion GOLD DEPOSITS
“In search of gold? Looking for the next gold rush? The oceans are a good place to look, however, it’s not as easy as panning for gold. Ocean waters around the world contain about 20 million tons of gold in them. When I say “in” that is meant literally, there is gold in ocean water. Unfortunately, the concentration lies on the order of parts per trillion, making it extremely difficult to get. Based on today’s spot price of gold at $42.51 USD per gram, that amount of gold would be worth roughly $771 trillion. Compare that with the United States gross domestic product (GDP) in 2016 of 18.57 trillion and its 41 times. Alternatively, you can compare it to the world domestic product of $78.28 trillion in 2014, almost 10 times the entire world’s domestic product.”
Back to the gold standard… and the end of the oceans?
Maybe they can filter out the plastic at the same time
Dee, the Forbes article you quote above is apparently a few years old.
A gold price of USD $ 42.51 translates to USD $ 1322 / troy oz.
Gold has appreciated around 50 % in the interim.
Silver meanwhile, has more than doubled from its March 2020 lows.
David Ellis Report: Surveillance (the Five Eyes cement)
“A huge deposit holding at least 470 tons of gold has been discovered beneath the seabed of the East China Sea. The largest deposit is located two kilometers below sea level in an area with estimated reserves of at least 1,500 tons of gold. It was discovered in the Laizhou city which has the largest gold reserves in China. More than 2,000 tons of gold has been found there recently.”
https://www.rt.com/business/321669-china-gold-seabed-discovery/
So the Malaysia airlines flight which according to the fairly stupid official story turned around and headed for antarctica and crashed into the indian ocean, was supposedly searched for by Abbott with his “yellow submarine”(?) up and down an ocean ridge off the WA coast. So now they are going for undersea gold, there must be a future in gold, or has someone just asked for their gold back, as the French did in about 1970 when Nixon abolished the gold standard and made money printing official. And now we hear there is ice on the south pole of the moon so there is a race to fence that off.
A Second Letter to Thomas F. Bayard,
CHALLENGING HIS RIGHT, AND THAT OF ALL OTHER
SO-CALLED SENATORS AND REPRESENTATIVES IN CONGRESS,
TO EXERCISE ANY LEGISLATIVE POWER WHATEVER
OVER THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES (1884)
by Lysander Spooner (1808-1887)
To Thomas F. Bayard of Delaware:
http://praxeology.net/LS-LB.htm
“…..……1. No man can delegate, or give to another, any right of arbitrary dominion over himself; for that would be giving himself away as a slave. And this no one can do. Any contract to do so is necessarily an absurd one, and has no validity. To call such a contract a “constitution,” or by any other high-sounding name, does not alter its character as an absurd and void contract.
No man can delegate, or give to another, any right of arbitrary dominion over a third person; for that would imply a right in the first person, not only to make the third person his slave, but also a right to dispose of him as a slave to still other persons. Any contract to do this is necessarily a criminal one, and therefore invalid. To call such a contract a “constitution” does not at all lessen its criminality, or add to its validity. These facts, that no man can delegate, or give away, his own natural right to liberty, nor any other man’s natural right to liberty, prove that he can delegate no right of arbitrary dominion whatever — or, what is the same thing, no legislative power whatever — over himself or anybody else, to any man, or body of men.
This impossibility of any man’s delegating any legislative power whatever, necessarily results from the fact that the law of nature has drawn the line — and that, too, [*5] a line that can never be effaced nor removed — between each man’s own interest and inalienable rights of person and property, and each and every other man’s inherent and inalienable rights of person and property. It, therefore, necessarily fixes the unalterable limits, within which every man may rightfully seek his own happiness, in his own way, free from all responsibility to, or interference by, his fellow men, or any of them.
All this pretended delegation of legislative power — that is, of a power, on the part of the legislators, so-called, to make any laws of their own device, distinct from the law of nature — is therefore an entire falsehood; a falsehood whose only purpose is to cover and hide a pure usurpation, by one body of men, of arbitrary dominion over other men. That this legislative power, or power of arbitrary dominion, is a pure usurpation, on the part of those who now exercise it, and not a “trust” delegated to them, is still further proved by the fact that the only delegation of power, that is even professed or pretended to be made, is made secretly — that is, by secret ballot — and not in any open and authentic manner; and therefore not by any men, or body of men, who make themselves personally responsible, as principals, for the acts of those to whom they profess to delegate the power..
All this pretended delegation of power having been made secretly — that is, only by secret ballot — not a single one of all the legislators, socalled, who profess to be exercising only a delegated power, has himself any legal knowledge, or can offer any legal proof, as to who the particular individuals were who delegated it to him. And having no power to identify the individuals who professed to delegate the power to him, he cannot show any legal proof that anybody ever even attempted or pretended to delegate it to him.
Plainly, a man who exercises any arbitrary dominion over other men and who claims to be exercising only a delegated power, but cannot show who his principals are, nor, consequently, prove that he has any principals, must be presumed, both in law and reason, to have no principals; and therefore to be exercising no power but his own. And having, of right, no such power of his own, he is, both in law and reason, a naked usurper.
Sir, a secret ballot makes a secret government; and a secret government is a government by conspiracy; in which the people at large can have no rights. And that is the only government we now have. It is the government of which you are a voluntary member and supporter, and yet you claim to be an honest man. If you are an honest man, is not your honesty that of a thoughtless, ignorant man, who merely drifts with the current, instead of exercising any judgement of his own?
https://static1.squarespace.com/static/55a3c833e4b07c31913e6eae/t/55a52475e4b0bf42f2b02cd7/1436886133244/A LETTER TO THOMAS Bayard.pdf
DE JURE SANGUINIS CORONAE
Ancient Latin legal maxim literally meaning “concerning (the) law of (the) blood of crowns” In COMMON LAW since the end of the 16th Century, royal or noble blood has claimed superior status — in particular to the freedom of their body, protection of property and the obligation of any matter brought against them to follow DUE PROCESS (of the LAW), especially right of RELIEF. When an individual claims de jure sanguinis coronae, providing they demonstrate a comprehension of the term and why they should be granted such status (for example–knowledge of the valid argument that you are of royal birth by virtue of being Sons and Daughters of the King of Kings) then the COURT must grant such recognition.
If Cardinal Pell had understood the Bible?
Deuteronomy 19:15-19 (NKJV) The Law Concerning Witnesses. 15 “One witness shall not rise against a man concerning any iniquity or any sin that he commits; by the mouth of two or three witnesses the matter shall be established.
Law history –
From 3rd Century BCE Latin lāres = “a group ancient Roman deities (gods) defining localized activities, customs and practices accumulated over time including (but not limited to) home, family, the state, the sea, land and travel”;
12th Century Old English lārs = “a collection of common doctrines, customs and practices accumulated over time; and the teaching of such customs”; later
16th Century Middle English lore/law = “A collection of rules (doctrines), customs and practices (accumulated over time) enjoining or prohibiting certain action; also the individual rules themselves “.
Contrary to misleading information, the Ancient Roman Legal System never considered the customs of lāres as being other than religious doctrine and ancient superstitions (witchcraft). Instead, the Roman Empire was founded on lēx/lēgis (statutes) and later (under Constantine) ilex (universal statutes).
The modern western legal systems of nations are therefore based on inferior lāres –religious doctrines and concepts designed by the Roman Cult–while the Roman Cult reserved the formal structure of superior lēx/lēgis in the form of covenants and agreements such as Concordats, Official Church Councils and Papal Bulls.
Divine Law Definition:
the law that defines the Divine in accordance with Astrum Iuris Divini Canonum and clearly demonstrates the spirit, mind, purpose and instruction of the Divine Creator including the operation of the Volition and Will of the Divine Creator through existence. Therefore all valid Law may be said to be derived from Divine Law. The highest law of all Law is therefore Divine Law, then Natural Law, then Cognitive Law, then Positive Law
Natural law –
Definition:the law that defines the operation of the Volition and Will of the Divine Creator in accordance with Astrum Iuris Divini Canonum through its existence in the Form of matter and physical rules. Natural Laws define the operation and existence of the physical universe, all valid Positive Law may be said to be derived from Natural Law
Cognitive law
Definition:the set of laws that define the special attributes possessed by certain higher orderlife such as mind, ideas, knowledge, recognition and self-awareness created through the simultaneous application of both Divine Law and Natural Law
Positive law
Definition:the laws that are enacted by Men and Women through proper authority in accordance with Astrum Iuris Divini Canonum for the government of a society. As Positive Law ultimately refers to physical objects and living beings, all valid Positive Law may be said to be derived from Natural Law
Natural person –
Definition: A man or woman in Roman law as a perverse or false attempt to claim that the fiction of Person is part of Natural law
Personailty
Definition:At the beginning of the 19th Century, a new definition was added to reflect the real-world fact of unique differences between individuals, namely “A set of qualities that makes a PERSON distinct from another”. The use of the word “personality” in the creation of the fictional and extremely dangerous “science” of psychology is attested from the early 20th Century meaning “assumed role or manner of PERSONAL behaviour”.
Who or What is a Person ? Court actions and God’s opinion.
As a young boy at Nudgee Boys Collage, Brisbane, Queensland, I was referred to as ‘Master’, and never really understood why?
Now I’m fully aware that One is the ‘Master of their vessel’ until the age of 14, (12 in the USA) and then through deceit and ignorance, One becomes the ‘Vassal of their Master’!
As you all should be aware by now, the legal definition of ‘Person’ is “Corporation”; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vD8ISiJfgW4
And the legal definition for Human is “Monster”‘Unable to ever be an Heir to land’; https://thelawdictionary.org/monster/
Also at Nudgee, they drummed into us that ‘All roads lead to Rome’, Rome wasn’t built in a day’, and ‘When in Rome, do what the Romans do’!
That said, all LAW/law in the West is ecclesiastical (Admiralty LAW of the sea; AKA Inland Piracy), No exceptions; this is why the Bible is in all Court rooms in the West and beyond.
I clearly remember the story of Adam and Eve, and the stark warning, ‘don’t eat the fruit!’! Translated into Latin is Usufruct, say it slowly; Us u fruct or use the fruit.
Don’t use the fruit of another’s creation, as God will NEVER-RESPECT-EWE! Here’s the legal definition of Usufructuary; https://thelawdictionary.org/usufructuary/
Remember, a Person in LAW is nothing more than a ‘Thing’.
Here’s the actual legal definition of Usufruct; https://thelawdictionary.org/usufruct/
All Western countries and beyond have been infiltrated by Vatican UNIDROIT (Private LAW) Banker/quasi Governments, see here; https://www.unidroit.org/about-unidroit/membership
Here is a direct extract from an Australian LAW book known as; ‘Elements of Roman LAW by R. W. Lee, printed by The Law book company of Australia PTY LTD’. Printed in 1944. Not so long ago. Page 47; “Was the Roman Slave a thing or a Person? The answer is he was both. He could be owned and as such was a res. [financial instrument] but he was a human being and as such a person.” [Do the words resume, reside, resolve, resist, resonate with you?]
DE JURE SANGUINIS CORONAE
Ancient Latin legal maxim literally meaning “concerning (the) law of (the) blood of crowns” In COMMON LAW since the end of the 16th Century, royal or noble blood has claimed superior status — in particular to the freedom of their body, protection of property and the obligation of any matter brought against them to follow DUE PROCESS (of the LAW), especially right of RELIEF. When an individual claims de jure sanguinis coronae, providing they demonstrate a comprehension of the term and why they should be granted such status (for example–knowledge of the valid argument that you are of royal birth by virtue of being Sons and Daughters of the King of Kings) then the COURT must grant such recognition.
If Cardinal Pell had understood the Bible?
Deuteronomy 19:15-19 (NKJV) The Law Concerning Witnesses. 15 “One witness shall not rise against a man concerning any iniquity or any sin that he commits; by the mouth of two or three witnesses the matter shall be established.
Law history –
From 3rd Century BCE Latin lāres = “a group ancient Roman deities (gods) defining localized activities, customs and practices accumulated over time including (but not limited to) home, family, the state, the sea, land and travel”;
12th Century Old English lārs = “a collection of common doctrines, customs and practices accumulated over time; and the teaching of such customs”; later
16th Century Middle English lore/law = “A collection of rules (doctrines), customs and practices (accumulated over time) enjoining or prohibiting certain action; also the individual rules themselves “.
Contrary to misleading information, the Ancient Roman Legal System never considered the customs of lāres as being other than religious doctrine and ancient superstitions (witchcraft). Instead, the Roman Empire was founded on lēx/lēgis (statutes) and later (under Constantine) ilex (universal statutes).
The modern western legal systems of nations are therefore based on inferior lāres –religious doctrines and concepts designed by the Roman Cult–while the Roman Cult reserved the formal structure of superior lēx/lēgis in the form of covenants and agreements such as Concordats, Official Church Councils and Papal Bulls.
Divine Law Definition:
the law that defines the Divine in accordance with Astrum Iuris Divini Canonum and clearly demonstrates the spirit, mind, purpose and instruction of the Divine Creator including the operation of the Volition and Will of the Divine Creator through existence. Therefore all valid Law may be said to be derived from Divine Law. The highest law of all Law is therefore Divine Law, then Natural Law, then Cognitive Law, then Positive Law
Natural law –
Definition:the law that defines the operation of the Volition and Will of the Divine Creator in accordance with Astrum Iuris Divini Canonum through its existence in the Form of matter and physical rules. Natural Laws define the operation and existence of the physical universe, all valid Positive Law may be said to be derived from Natural Law
Cognitive law
Definition:the set of laws that define the special attributes possessed by certain higher orderlife such as mind, ideas, knowledge, recognition and self-awareness created through the simultaneous application of both Divine Law and Natural Law
Positive law
Definition:the laws that are enacted by Men and Women through proper authority in accordance with Astrum Iuris Divini Canonum for the government of a society. As Positive Law ultimately refers to physical objects and living beings, all valid Positive Law may be said to be derived from Natural Law
Natural person –
Definition: A man or woman in Roman law as a perverse or false attempt to claim that the fiction of Person is part of Natural law
Personailty
Definition:At the beginning of the 19th Century, a new definition was added to reflect the real-world fact of unique differences between individuals, namely “A set of qualities that makes a PERSON distinct from another”. The use of the word “personality” in the creation of the fictional and extremely dangerous “science” of psychology is attested from the early 20th Century meaning “assumed role or manner of PERSONAL behaviour”.
Who or What is a Person ? Court actions and God’s opinion.
As a young boy at Nudgee Boys Collage, Brisbane, Queensland, I was referred to as ‘Master’, and never really understood why?
Now I’m fully aware that One is the ‘Master of their vessel’ until the age of 14, (12 in the USA) and then through deceit and ignorance, One becomes the ‘Vassal of their Master’!
As you all should be aware by now, the legal definition of ‘Person’ is “Corporation”; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vD8ISiJfgW4
And the legal definition for Human is “Monster”‘Unable to ever be an Heir to land’; https://thelawdictionary.org/monster/
Also at Nudgee, they drummed into us that ‘All roads lead to Rome’, Rome wasn’t built in a day’, and ‘When in Rome, do what the Romans do’!
That said, all LAW/law in the West is ecclesiastical (Admiralty LAW of the sea; AKA Inland Piracy), No exceptions; this is why the Bible is in all Court rooms in the West and beyond.
I clearly remember the story of Adam and Eve, and the stark warning, ‘don’t eat the fruit!’! Translated into Latin is Usufruct, say it slowly; Us u fruct or use the fruit.
Don’t use the fruit of another’s creation, as God will NEVER-RESPECT-EWE! Here’s the legal definition of Usufructuary; https://thelawdictionary.org/usufructuary/
Remember, a Person in LAW is nothing more than a ‘Thing’.
Here’s the actual legal definition of Usufruct; https://thelawdictionary.org/usufruct/
All Western countries and beyond have been infiltrated by Vatican UNIDROIT (Private LAW) Banker/quasi Governments, see here; https://www.unidroit.org/about-unidroit/membership
Here is a direct extract from an Australian LAW book known as; ‘Elements of Roman LAW by R. W. Lee, printed by The Law book company of Australia PTY LTD’. Printed in 1944. Not so long ago. Page 47; “Was the Roman Slave a thing or a Person? The answer is he was both. He could be owned and as such was a res. [financial instrument] but he was a human being and as such a person.” [Do the words resume, reside, resolve, resist, resonate with you?]
And the legal definition for Human is “Monster”‘Unable to ever be an Heir to land’; https://thelawdictionary.org/monster/
Also at Nudgee, they drummed into us that ‘All roads lead to Rome’, Rome wasn’t built in a day’, and ‘When in Rome, do what the Romans do’!
That said, all LAW/law in the West is ecclesiastical (Admiralty LAW of the sea; AKA Inland Piracy), No exceptions; this is why the Bible is in all Court rooms in the West and beyond.
I clearly remember the story of Adam and Eve, and the stark warning, ‘don’t eat the fruit!’! Translated into Latin is Usufruct, say it slowly; Us u fruct or use the fruit.
Don’t use the fruit of another’s creation, as God will NEVER-RESPECT-EWE! Here’s the legal definition of Usufructuary; https://thelawdictionary.org/usufructuary/
Remember, a Person in LAW is nothing more than a ‘Thing’.
Here’s the actual legal definition of Usufruct; https://thelawdictionary.org/usufruct/
All Western countries and beyond have been infiltrated by Vatican UNIDROIT (Private LAW) Banker/quasi Governments, see here; https://www.unidroit.org/about-unidroit/membership
Here is a direct extract from an Australian LAW book known as; ‘Elements of Roman LAW by R. W. Lee, printed by The Law book company of Australia PTY LTD’. Printed in 1944. Not so long ago. Page 47; “Was the Roman Slave a thing or a Person? The answer is he was both. He could be owned and as such was a res. [financial instrument] but he was a human being and as such a person.” [Do the words resume, reside, resolve, resist, resonate with you?]
Isaiah 9:6 NKJV – For unto us a Child is born, Unto us a …
For unto us a Child is born, Unto us a Son is given; And the government will be upon His shoulder. And His name will be called Wonderful, Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.
“This is, even more, a case in the light of recently released documents showing that the United Kingdom began planning for a war with Germany 20 years before it began because the role of the newly unified German State was perceived as a threat to the United Kingdom’s worldwide empire.”
James I was aware that England planned and started both WW I and WW II, but I did not suspect it was planned so long ago. I bet the Jewish Bankers were the planners.
A similar situation between Australia and China to that of England and Germany. The Jewish Bankers expected to be able to war with Germany and have no repercussions to the Jewish population, the same as Morrison expects no repercussions in trade with China due to his idiotic remarks against that country.
In relation to my second paragraph, “The Jewish Bankers expected to be able to war with Germany and have no repercussions to the Jewish population”
This was even though the Zionists had placed embargoes on German trade and declared war on Germany on behalf of World Jewry as far back as 1933, six years before the outbreak of war.
Germany’s War
The Origins, Aftermath and Atrocities of World War II
https://www.unz.com/book/john_wear__germanys-war/
Criss X, the article you posted above by John Wear appearing in Unz.com is one of the most outstanding anyone is likely to read on the TRUE events surrounding WW II.
It’s a must read.
Chapter 8 : ‘ The Alleged Genocide of European Jewry’ is a standout for those who mistakenly believe that more than a few hundred thousand Jews perished in World War II.
Of course, those of you that can spare the time, will do well to read all chapters from John Wear’s book – it’s only 167,000 words.
I don’t have a horse in the race, I just call it how I see it.
If the Jews could start both world wars then why are they moving so slowly on Zion?
They had national hero Moshe Dayan down there in the Sinai decades ago, with his eyepatch and his tank, and they should have taken their old land back east of the Nile but nothing happened. I don’t see that they have so much power as people say.
People blaming other races for things they didn’t do, irks me, and I can’t explain why the Jews and Muslims don’t disown things they are accused of.
H.W.Bush was essentially completely stoopid, let the cat out of the bag with NWO and 9-11. Because he couldn’t keep his mouth shut, and he couldn’t stop organising stoopid things, we know everything. He even proved the Bushs had a stoopid gene by his offspring. Jews and muslims weren’t required, they just had bit-parts.
Further.
Why did the blood moon rise in 1999 exactly when W won the nomination.
Rabbi Bobby, seeing as we’re mates now, there’s no need to peddle the nonsense about ‘taking back their own land east of the Nile’.
After all, 98 % of the Jewish diaspora (and I assume you are among them), are Ashkenazi Jews.
And 100 % of the fanatical Likudnic Apartheid state administrators of Occupied Palestine (Netanyahu and his minions), are also Ashkenazi.
That said, ‘your own land’ is the former Khazarian territory of Dagestan , northern Turkey / Armenia / Caucasus region more or less.
Why are your people STEALING the lands of the TRUE Semites ? (seeing as we know for CERTAIN that Palestinians, Lebanese, Syrians and Jordanians are the bloodline descendants of the peoples that occupied the lands of Judea in biblical times).
C’mon Bobby, you’re an educated guy, all the Gumshoe readers want to know on what basis you can justify theft of these lands and the ongoing genocidal practices against the good peoples of Palestine ?
I may have been a rabbi yesterday but today I am an agent for Putin.
Turkey and Syria were always a bloodbath for millennia (as everywhere).
Philistines I read somewhere were originally Cretans, came on a boat.
Your ashkenazi thing is something from medieval times.
I’m not here to defend Zionist Terra Nullius doctrine.
I can say that I heard muslims have a law that they may not sell to Jews so if they want to sell their house to a Jew they have to pretend they were evicted. This sounds quite feasible to me. I’m not saying every case, not at all. Things are not simple as you demand of them.
My chief interest is how much clout do the Jews have in the evils of the world, how much influence do they have via banking.
I suggest they are mostly doing legitimate business, I don’t excuse “Rotschild parties” of the 70’s but again, they may be an easy target, look at our sovereign’s husband, did a hit and run quite recently and not even one night in the slammer. It’s just gone away. Maybe Rotschilds were not the only ones doing satanist parties, they may be the only ones we heard about. Hitlers crowd threw a big party, lasted a few years, probably we don’t hear enough about that. Left guessing.
I think the Jews got fingered by the neo-Nazis and they are and always have been an easy target.
I’ve previously posted this on Gumshoe but there seems to be a bit of short memory syndrome
New to me, it’s a good watch
I’m going to watch it again too
I watched this video when previously posted.
This so called ‘Muslim cleric’ is not only unrepresentative of the views of Palestininan/Arabic peoples collectively, he doesn’t represent the views of a SINGLE Arab person.
He’s obviously been paid to say those things to appease his Jewish masters.
His views are worthless.
Seems like he could’ just possibly, be a bit more qualified to speak than someone who’s totally unfamiliar with both the Koran and the Bible:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abdul_Hadi_Palazzi
Good link and an excerpt: “Palazzi accepts Israel’s sovereignty over the Holy Land, and says the Qur’an supports it as the will of God as a necessary prerequisite for the Final Judgment.”
Berry, I know plenty about the Koran. (I know it’s sometimes written as Qu’ran).
NOTE TO SELF : Always be tactful and diplomatic in future when responding to Berry *.
(* I’ll be pursuing this course of action from now on in light of events that transpired the other day.
I was paying out on Berry and she returned fire by opening up with both barrels at short range.
I did as well as could be expected under the circumstances and managed to limp away with three limbs still intact).
Canada’s Chief Medical Officers Says You Should Wear a Mask While Having Sex
http://www.renegadetribune.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Screenshot_2020-09-02-Wear-a-mask-while-having-sex-Canadas-top-doctor-suggests.png
I am not even kidding. The world has become completely insane and most people are just accepting “the new normal.”
Read the post
http://www.renegadetribune.com/canadas-chief-medical-officers-says-you-should-wear-a-mask-while-having-sex/
re: media barons
I see Zuckerberg this morning saying Facebook has an arrangement with Reuters for news, the latter of course being a Rotschild company, the former, no doubt, helped along by Rotschilds, cloaked as various anonymous investment companies and agencies.
Facebook wiped out Murdock’s “myspace” startup even though it was older. (2005 to 2008, it was the largest social networking site in the world – source google).
So one might suppose Murdock is a bit dirty on Rotschilds.
It is said Murdock sold “sky” but probably just arranged for it to be financed by other people’s money, maybe to stop his sons from selling it like James Packer who sold 9 fairly soon after his father’s death.
Sky and Fox are like the alternative news now, lots of good stuff archived on youtube.
Here’s Clive Palmer getting a right of reply, it’s all ok but some Gumshoe people might be most interested in the last 2 minutes
OFF TOPIC: More on Grand Solar Minimum by NOAA –
https://www.sott.net/article/440781-NOAA-confirms-a-full-blown-Grand-Solar-Minimum
I wonder what this crazy world will look like by 2030.
Excellent link (from my fairly superficial examination), supports Isaac Newton’s position (arrived at independently) that nothing very terrible would happen before 2060.
Thanks,
My thinking had me jumping off the barn roof just now. Sir Isaac you say, perfect name for a mattress.
(wink y/all)
I’m almost 73, so by 2030 I may not even be around. Crikey, by 2040 things should be really interesting, let alone going into 2050.
Anyway, my property will hopefully be passed on to a young couple that can work the permaculture, good soil, raised gardens, water tanks, root cellar, etc. and come out the other side with a strong, healthy family.
I had a haircut today from the local hairdresser (I’m a quick job with my balding head) and her family is building up an egg farm. She’s looking at 400 hens and showed me pictures of the packing equipment with a conveyor belt system on the property. – I think I will be OK for eggs…
Topic re bioweapons carried forward (they are all ultimately interlinked)
I have borrowed this comment from elsewhere:
“This is going to be interesting. Dilyana Gaytandzhieva has been working away on researching that lab in Georgia. There has now been a data leak of hundreds of documents from the lab. She had discovered something fishy going on there earlier in the year, a biological warfare program run on Georgian soil by the US. Interesting, everyone involved in fighting disinformation then turned on her and said it was Russian propaganda. More recently, there have been claims in the media further obscuring the actual work there by saying that the lab has been working on COVID research. Right. Anyway, Dilyana’s twitter feed is worth checking.”
Dilyana:
“Arms Watch has been alerted to the massive data leak from the Pentagon biolab in Georgia and we are currently analyzing with our volunteers hundreds of leaked documents https://t.co/BPu4Ss5IRu [Twitter link]”
This was her original major report on this topic – go to her home page for more:
http://dilyana.bg/bulgarian-journalist-confronts-robert-kadlec-over-the-us-secret-bio-weapons/
I look forward to learning of further developments.
Comment from the comment monitor.
Dear Criss cross. I have no idea what you want us to learn from your exegesis. Maybe it would be very valuable to us. It lacks any introduction.
I suggest you write it up as an article rather then a bunch of comments, and submit it to Dee. In any case, the word limit for comments is 200 words, expandable if the topic is a direct reply to the author of the article, in this case James O’Neill. The word limit for articles is 2000.
Tony Ryan. oziz4oziz.com
Why am I poor in wealthy Australia?
End free trade and restore prosperity.
Thank you, Tony
Off topic, from Jim Corbett’s video “Who is Bill Gates?”
The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation spends tens of millions of dollars per year on media partnerships, sponsoring coverage of its program areas across the board. Gates funds The Guardian‘s Global Development website. Gates funds NPR’s global health coverage. Gates funds the Our World in Data website that is tracking the latest statistics and research on the coronavirus pandemic. Gates funds BBC coverage of global health and development issues, both through its BBC Media Action organization and the BBC itself. Gates funds world health coverage on ABC News.
When the NewsHour with Jim Lehrer was given a $3.5 million Gates foundation grant to set up a special unit to report on global health issues, NewsHour communications chief Rob Flynn was asked about the potential conflict of interest that such a unit would have in reporting on issues that the Gates Foundation is itself involved in. “In some regards I guess you might say that there are not a heck of a lot of things you could touch in global health these days that would not have some kind of Gates tentacle,” Flynn responded.
Gates has a piece of Facebook
Janes,
I do not read your articles any More.
When you explain that all foreign affairs and policies are controlled by the bankers for their agendas, then I might reconsider.
I did not read the article ether, as the photo put me off. “Congress” has nothing to do with what James considers Australia’s subservience to “the United States.”
Both are subservient to the global masters.
Is there any creature more subservient than a US Congressperson? Show me one.
Greg Hunt ?
I don’t know, Ned. I cannot be sure if James is 100% accurate on every single detail but he doesn’t seem to be deliberately obfuscating or omitting to me. There are plenty of hooks and handles that that can take readers down one of the many rabbit holes that eventually provide the big picture.
This is what James’ article brought to my mind (with thanks James).
A quote – as usual:
“DEMOCRACY: it is controlled by capitalist ownership and control of the media, grants from tax-free foundations and favoured press coverage for favoured political candidates. Wide franchise to vote is given to the people to make them easier to control by making them think that “the people” are responsible for the inevitable distortions and negative consequences of the policies the super-rich mattoids impose in order to serve their selfish interests. Democracy separates authority from responsibility, this making it virtually impossible for the voters to reform the system. Those in authority (the mattoids) have no responsibility. Those responsible (the politicians) have no authority except that which is lent to them by their controllers.“
W. A. Carto. May 20, 2003 in “Populism vs Plutocracy: The Universal Struggle” and cited in ”Publisher’s Note” as preface to “The Third Rome: Holy Russia, Tsarism and Orthodoxy” by Matthew Raphael Johnson (first published 2003 – Third Edition 2010)
Johnson himself in “Introductory and Personal Notes” makes the following list of the consequences of ‘Democracy’ and our ‘liberalised’ culture: (bullet point structure added and several very US-specific ones omitted for brevity – bold emphasis added)
• Semi-literate “college graduates”,
• A flurry of meaningless low wage service jobs,
• Destroyed or corrupt labour unions,
• Destroyed and broke family farmers.
• Unspeakably concentrated wealth,
• A media monopoly based around a handful of major families,
• Debased art,
• A laughably inferior public education system,
• Mindless pop music,
• Endless deaths and murders on mainstream prime time television,
• Falling wages,
• Massive increases in bankruptcies and private debt,
• A violent and immoral foreign policy that has for no good reason except instruction from an alien state just destroyed 5000 years of culture in Iraq, **
• A horrifying divorce rate,
• Suicides in the tens of thousands yearly,
• Increasing social and economic dropouts,
• Gang warfare in the cities,
• Massive indulgence in both legal and illegal drugs,
• Ethnic strife,
• **Constant and media-driven racial violence,
• Increase in road rage incidents,
• Acts of violence in the workplace,
• Overstuffed prisons,
• An unapproachable and often incompetent academic elite,
Comment: Based on what we are now witnessing in Victoria, “Democracy” is voting in pencil for pre-selected individuals who, once in political office, then make decisions and take actions that the majority who voted them into office did not vote for.
That’s a tragic list, Julius.
Although taking place in a democracy, I think most of it — even the debased art and the broke family farmers, were under direction from the very top. So legislators, pollies, never even voted one way or the other for them
Speaking of debased art – I particularly like the “Black Circle” piece of Kazimir Malevich, don’t you?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kazimir_Malevich
Or perhaps the “Supremacist Painting Eight Red Rectangles”
Oh my – I am so caught between the two !!
A better summary of institutionalised mass delusion of grandeur (paranoia) epitomised in the slogan of the French Revolution: “each man will be his own king, his own pope and his own god” than Julius’ quote above: “Democracy separates authority from responsibility, this making it virtually impossible for the voters to reform the system. Those in authority (the mattoids) have no responsibility. Those responsible (the politicians) have no authority except that which is lent to them by their controllers.“
Democracy is the perfect recipe for what Aristotle miscalled “the tyranny of the ignorant”, which I think would be better called “the tyranny of the over-ambitious sycophants of the hidden hand”.
Such abject sycophants and ideologues, lacking wisdom and integrity, are legion such that if any one of them should no longer “suit the purpose” they can be easily replaced by more of the same carrying another rhetorical banner.
The Australian Constitution is fairly unique in that the elected representatives were not intended to be the supreme authority in the right order of civil affairs but delegates to represent the concerns and interests of the people of the Commonwealth. The ultimate (but challengeable) authority is the ONE appointed to that responsibility by heredity or something other than popular acclaim.
Does anybody remember Andrew Traitor Robb? The Daily Mail of Aug 27, 2020 says of him:
“He made the claim [that our relations with China were best ever] as China suspended beef imports from a fifth abattoir in Queensland after Prime Minister Scott Morrison threatened to tear up Victoria’s Belt and Road deal with Beijing.
“China’s customs authority claims it found the banned drug chloramphenicol in beef from the family-owned business John Dee Warwick. Nonetheless, Australia’s annual exports to China during the last financial year hit a new record high of $151billion – with the Communist nation buying 34 per cent of all Australian exports.”
As soon as the mental health thing became a thing, Andrew Robb discovered he was “depressed” and needed 6 months paid leave, during that time I think he was teeing up his Chinese career, after that he was no longer depressed.
John Howard’s best students appear to be accomplished liars, at least in their own minds, as they embark on their international careers. Could there be a law made against all this lying, or is that as silly as “who will bell the cat”
Well Denial Andrews on the morning TV looks very troubled, almost as if he is about to vomit and cry at the same time.
OFF TOPIC, BUT A BIGGIE!
I just sent this email to Dee, perhaps we can work it into an article –
OK, we all remember ‘Event 201’ last year as a prelude to the global plandemic. Christian of Iceage Farmer hit me between the eyes with another desk top exercise called ‘A global food security game’ that took place back in Nov 2015 – 5 years ago.
I looked through a few clips and there was John Podeska talking about the ‘new normal’. Agreements on carbon taxes, taking control of the world’s food supply, a global police force, etc.
Guess when this ‘game’ started? Go on, take a guess –
.
.
.
.
In the year 2020.
Here’s a clip, it looks like the people that put together the film for the Event 201 exercise also did this clip.
https://youtu.be/f03OtxEKXXY
Their time is short –
Zophar’s Sermon on the Wicked Man
Job 20 Then Zophar the Naamathite answered and said:
2
“Therefore my anxious thoughts make me answer,
Because of the turmoil within me.
3
I have heard the rebuke that reproaches me,
And the spirit of my understanding causes me to answer.
4
“Do you not know this of old,
Since man was placed on earth,
5
That the triumphing of the wicked is short,
And the joy of the hypocrite is but for a moment?
6
Though his haughtiness mounts up to the heavens,
And his head reaches to the clouds,………….…
Revelation 12:12 “Therefore rejoice, O heavens, and you who dwell in them! Woe to the inhabitants of the earth and the sea! For the devil has come down to you, having great wrath, because he knows that he has a short time.”
“We even place within you a ‘guilt complex’ making you afraid to criticize Jewry openly.”
The cause of mankind’s enslavement is that nations have allowed Cabalist bankers to create the medium of exchange (currency, credit) in the form of a debt to themselves when free governments could easily create this necessary commodity, debt-free. Success in society now depends on criminality and treason: complicity with this massive fraud and the pernicious agenda it represents.
In 1976, insider Harold Rosenthal revealed that this subversive agenda already extended to every aspect of Western life……………………..”
https://www.henrymakow.com/000334.html
“……..That is what I mean when I refer to corrupt governments. Any one who sacrifices the interests of the people for the benefit of profit-makers is a traitor. He is the fifth columnist of to-day-the enemy inside our gates.”
Australian Senator Richard Darcey Hansard 12 November 1941
1 Timothy 6:10
For the love of money is a root of all kinds of evil, for which some have strayed from the faith in their greediness, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows.
Luke 16:14
The Law, the Prophets, and the Kingdom
Now the Pharisees, who were lovers of money, also heard all these things, and they derided Him.
2 Timothy 3:2
For men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy,
Love Truth on a Son day morning.
Thankyou.
Malachi 4:2: “But for you who revere my name, the sun of righteousness will rise with healing in its wings. And you will go out and leap like calves released from the stall.” This blessing is promised to those who fear the Lord and are ready for His return.
‘Heaven is My throne, And earth is My footstool. What house will you build for Me? says the Lord, Or what is the place of My rest? … Acts 7:49
Vaxxed Downunder Qld tour starts Sept 10 heading north from Gympie
by Editor, cairnsnews
The North Queensland Vaxxed Downunder Tour starts next week in Gympie on the 10th of September.
It is not too late to sign up to see the bus and tell your story. Please fill out the survey monkey form ASAP.
https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/vaxxedaus
Gympie, Hervey Bay, Bundaberg, Gladstone, Rockhampton, Mackay, Townsville, Cairns, Atherton, Greenvale, Charters Towers, Clermont, Emerald, Springsure, Rolleston, Roma, Miles, Chinchilla, Dalby.
If you have friends and family in those areas interested in visiting the bus please let them know about the tour ASAP!
https://cairnsnews.org/2020/09/05/vaxxed-downunder-qld-tour-starts-sept-10-heading-north-from-gympie/
I miss much these days.
When did Northern Territory become Northern Australia?
This story just in titled : ‘US election: Osama bin Laden’s niece makes shocking 9/11 claim’ :
https://au.yahoo.com/news/us-election-osama-bin-ladens-niece-makes-shocking-911-claim-010425551.html
The first few paragraphs read :
“The niece of one of history’s most infamous terrorists has made a startling claim ahead of the US election.
Noor Bin Laden, 33, the niece of 9/11 mastermind Osama bin Laden, told The New York Post another September 11-style attack could occur if Joe Biden is elected president.
“ISIS proliferated under the Obama/Biden administration, leading to them coming to Europe. Trump has shown he protects America and us by extension from foreign threats by obliterating terrorists at the root and before they get a chance to strike,” she said.
Ms Bin Laden, an ardent Trump supporter since 2015, said the current US President “must be re-elected”.
OK, then it’s all settled.
Bin Laden’s niece says the only hope for the world is a vote for Trump.
So, those of you who are potential Biden voters should think twice.
After all, Trump is ‘obliterating terrorists at the root’ says Noor (although, I could’ve sworn that it was RUSSIA that destroyed ISIS whilst the U.S was actively aiding and abetting ISIS with weaponry in their quest to destroy the democratically elected government of President Assad – the mortal enemy of ISIS).
Then again, what do I know.
According to Yahoo News, ‘Noor knows More’.
Hyper-Hypocrisy of The West about ISIS
During the period of 17 September to 11 December of 2016, the United States and its allies carried out a massive operation to move ISIS’s surviving jihadists who were in the oil-producing Iraqi region of Mosul, into the Syrian oil-producing region of Deir Ezzor and Palmyra. This was done so that those oil-stealing-and-selling jihadists in Iraq would now be stealing Syria’s oil and would thereby increase the likelihood of overthrowing Syria’s long-existing non-sectarian Government. The US and its allies would then replace that Government by one which would be controlled by the fundamentalist Sunni Saud family, who own Saudi Arabia, the long-time leading oil-power, and which family are America’s main foreign ally. The Sauds are crucial to maintaining the US dollar as the world’s reserve currency. The US aristocracy rely upon them.
Now that ISIS is being defeated by Syria’s Government (and by its allies Russia and Iran) in Syria, the United States and its allies are trying to find other governments that will take them in as refugees. It’s part of a deal the US regime reached with ISIS.
Read on –
https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2019/03/19/hyper-hypocrisy-west-about-isis.html
You Can’t Understand ISIS If You Don’t Know the History of Wahhabism in Saudi Arabia!
http://themillenniumreport.com/2014/08/you-cant-understand-isis-if-you-dont-know-the-history-of-wahhabism-in-saudi-arabia/
.
The Wahhabi Sunni Muslim terrorists are backed by Israel, Australia, US, France, UK and the West in General.
“………..The fact that Al Qaeda is totally a Sunni operation, and the fact that Al Qaeda believes that all Shia should be killed, are simply being ignored by U.S. officials. 9/11 is instead blamed on Shiites, though its perpetrators (other than Bush, Cheney and their friends) were almost entirely fundamentalist-Sunni Saudis, and none at all were Shiites, from anywhere………………”
https://www.sott.net/article/395953-Congresswoman-Tulsi-Gabbard-Accuses-Trump-Pence-of-Shielding-Al-Qaeda-in-Idlib
Yes Criss X, the U.S moved the surviving ISIS jihadists to a safer zone (to be used for nefarious purposes / regime change at a later time).
THAT is the reality of what went on in the so-called Syrian civil war.
ISIS was trained and equipped by the Mossad/CIA and funded by U.S proxies acting on instructions from the U.S.
Yet there are some commenters on Gumshoe who persist with the ‘Trump took out ISIS’ nonsense.
It’s absolutely laughable.