2,535 Australians
More than two thousand Australians commit suicide every year. In 2012 the figure was 2535. About 300 people drown – and around 10 people succumb to stings from the European Honey Bee each year in Australia. Three people died at Martin Place.
Even though Prime Minister Tony Abbott is on a mission to keep us safe – living is not risk free.
Metadata Man
Let us hope that the government does not use Monis as their ‘Metadata’ Man. Even before the dust settled in Sydney, the new Police Commissioner was on mainstream television pushing for our data. I doubt any amounts of metadata could have changed Monday’s events. They even got an anonymous tip off shortly before the event to view his increasingly disturbing website. We definitely do NOT need our metadata scooped up at such a huge cost to our liberties and pockets as a protection from people like Monis. We need the government and the media to put the Monis ‘event’ back into its box, and get back some perspective.
Fortunately, at least one Senator is proving to us that capturing our metadata is “...appalling, it’s absolutely appalling“. Senator Leyonhjelm agreed to have his company’s metadata captured – with shocking results. Any law passed today for the yielding of personal data will be usable by future governments, and governments whose size and shape we cannot today predict.
“The government’s basically saying we’re going to spy on everybody in the country,” said Leyonhjelm. And–
“If you’re going to invade people’s privacy and treat them all like criminals-in-waiting, then to what extent do you do that? Malcolm Turnbull has said it’s nothing more than phone data, to and from and time and location, but it’s a lot more than that. I don’t see how it can be limited to that and I don’t believe it will be, either.”
And all this to keep us safe? No, it is about control. But look on the bright side: We might put tens of thousands of Australian to work sifting through the megatons of metadata garbage. (see garbage satirical post)
But talking about saving lives: Maybe issuing some drought relief money to farmers (and not from the Federal Reserve debt machine) could save hundreds of farmers from committing suicide.
And as for tracking terrorists: Take 9/11 as an example: The FBI were tracking Mohammed Atta for at least nine months. But someone ‘above’ deliberately created intelligence ‘failures’ to facilitate the ‘9/11 staged event’.
Intelligence Failures
That was the post 9/11 mantra: ‘intelligence failures’. And the mainstream media have (justifiably) in this instance touted 10 catastrophic failures re: Monis – with ‘granted bail’ over accessory to the bizarre murder of his ex-wife; ‘dropping’ off the ‘watch list’, and ‘information not shared’ among them.
With the case of ‘Metadata’ Monis, it is difficult to gauge whether he was being ‘managed’ in any way. He has the perfect profile for such a role – as is clearly described in a 21st Century Wire Special Report, but there are some oddities to Monis that point to a socially rejected and mentally-unstable-media-junkie at the end of a long road of a political, religious, criminal and legal misadventure.
Does someone, after two decades of being a camera addict, then acquire a gun (shotgun at that) and go off on a ‘mission’ that has really only one conclusion – death or life in prison? Maybe?
He was allegedly pacing outside Channel 7 – but as they had recently beefed up security – he supposedly lands up at the Lindt cafe opposite buying a coffee. But – ooops – he forgot his ISIS flag. (My guess is that if he was being ‘managed‘, he would have been given the gun and the ISIS flag).
But as reported in Globalresearch he was a ‘Shape-Shifting Sheik’ with various aliases, from Sunni to Shite, from pens-for-peace to pledging allegiance to ISIS – and with his last words allegedly being, “Look what you’ve made me do”. All very odd.
And now we can only speculate what his plan of action was going to be?
But as my friend Mary said to me, “I just want to know when and how he managed to urinate during the 17 hours“.
In any event, I believe these questions should be asked: Was Monis at one time an informant? Had a psychological assessment ever been done? Any traces (anti-psychotic) medication?
Police Action
As I said in Pt 1, it was curious as to why we – the public – were kept in the dark about his identity until late into the night. We could also easily have been assured early in the afternoon that the person holding the hostages was acting alone. The perspective on prime time news and on the day would have taken on an entirely different hue had the public known who the police were dealing with. To me this could be a ‘sign’ of a staged event: The media and authorities creating a drawn out false reality.
I believe the authorities should not take the public for dummies. They should provide more open information – post the event. (I have seen many letters and comments “Why didn’t they just shoot him?”. Now we are told that the kind of glass in this building is “bank glass”, impossible to shoot through.) Also, we need to know how they tried to negotiate with the hostage taker?
Transparency
Again – the entire investigation must be transparent and nonrestrictive – so we can confirm that this was in fact the actions of a mentality unstable loner. For example, one has to be immediately suspicious of the the MH17 investigation, as it has been signed into secrecy until a consensus has been reached.
We are justified in questioning every (odd) ‘event’ as a possible false flag (or staged event). That is what police do when a husband calls 000 and says he has just arrived home and found his wife murdered. It is routine to investigate the husband to make sure he has not ‘staged’ the murder (event). Thus, it should be routine to investigate for a false flag event (and possible foreign intervention). We too, as Australians, need to be on guard for what might be staged, most likely by some controlling entity outside Australia, to manipulate us (and to manipulate our police and our politicians in Canberra) – for some (global) agenda that might not be in the interests of Australian citizens.
In analyzing Sydney, one has to peruse numerous factors with logic and without bias. There are a few factors, that individually mean little:
a) There had been a ”mock terror drill” at Martin Place only 12 months earlier,
b) Man Haron Monis fits the ‘unhinged’ lone wolf profile,
c) Identity of Monis withheld,
d) There was a tip off,
e) Legislation is waiting in the wings,
f) Inquiry with narrow terms of reference,
g) Intelligence failures,
h) The event was opposite a media organisation,
i) Government presently unpopular.
It seems these days there is always draconian legislation waiting in the wings and as Monis was a media junkie, it is logical to be near Channel 7. In reflection, maybe the police, on confirming Monis’s identity, were less proactive than they might have been – deciding the best option was to wait the ‘nutter’ out. And the police fortunately don’t get much practice dealing with hostage takers – but will probably be analyzing their tactics.
Monis’s seemingly haphazard modus operandi maybe more an indication of an unhinged loser than a managed one. But we will need to be more informed of the facts.
In any event, we do NOT need the metadata legislation to save us from the Monis’s of the world. And if the government uses Monis for this end, then we need to be more questioning and suspicious.
Clues on Staged Events
Over the years there have been countless ‘staged events’ – all done for all sorts of nefarious reasons. For example Operation Himmler in 1939 was a project planned by Nazi Germany to create the appearance of Polish aggression. There is the Gulf of Tonkin incident that started the Vietnam War – the list is endless. The most egregious and blatant in recent times is 9/11. Once you clear the smoke screen created by the mainstream media and government spin, the evaluation of the evidence (and spontaneous first reactions) provides clarity to this false flag event.
On staged events and false flags, there are some signs and patterns that need to evaluated and analysed. I am an amateur at this, by these come to mind:
1. The event is usually a high profile attack.
2. The government of the day is having a ‘bad day’ and needs ‘help’ to regain power/popularity.
3. There is a drill matching the ‘attack’ (9/11, 7/7 bombings, Sandy Hook).
4. There is often legislation (to remove liberties) waiting in the wings (9/11, underpants bomber, Sandy Hook).
5. There is some kind of stand down by police or military ‘allowing’ the attack to ‘happen’ (Cheney, NORAD on 9/11).
6. Crucial timelines and evidence is withheld from the public (e.g. cameras at the pentagon, 28 redacted pages).
7. Politicians and their spokes people seem prepared with a ‘narrative’ (e.g. Paul Bremer and Jerome Hauer on live television identified Bin Laden within hours).
8. The immediate reaction by newscasters etc. morphs or changes later to fit the political narrative.
9. The ‘lone-wolf’ scenario is pushed when evidence points to multiple sources/shooters (e.g. JFK, Aurora).
10. A scapegoat – a person that is a loose cannon / or mentally unstable, or mentally challenged is behind the ‘attack’ (e.g. Sirhan Sirhan, Sandy Hook, Port Arthur). This person is a patsy.
11. The scapegoat often has covert connections with intelligence agencies.
12. A mainstream media ‘beat up’ – creating an illusion of the reality, often stirring up public emotion (to fit an agenda).
13. Eyewitness accounts are often quelled (e.g Aurora witnesses reported multiple shooters).
14. Evidence of crisis actors (e.g. Sandy Hook, Boston bombing?).
15. An official inquiry/investigation where the narrative can be controlled (and tainted), but provides superficial comfort to the public.
16. An outcome that benefits those in power or aligned with power (e.g. Profits of war by invading Iraq). The outcome of the event benefits the (global) power structure.
17. Secrecy and non-transparency around detail.
18. Denial and obtuseness by people in power regarding the facts (e.g. WTC 7).
19. Newly appointed officials in critical controlling positions.
20. Advance predictive clues, or advance tips.
21. The mainstream media refuses to report the event honestly – often suppressing the obvious.
I’m am sure there are other factors. It is also logical to believe that false flags are also becoming more sophisticated to counter the internet sleuths and alternative media analysts.
The police, the politicians, the media, and the public – we need to all be on the same side. If there is complete transparency, and questions are answered without fear or favour, then we – as Australians – will be comforted that we are living in a democracy. But if certain aspects remain shrouded in secrecy, then, by default, it becomes a ‘managed’ event.
Hey, why knock Metadata?
Metadata will help to expose all the lies that are used to trick shock jock commentators, mass media, expired arm chair generals and politicians from lying to the public to have them conditioned to spend lives and our tax dollars on wars invading and killing.
With an efficient Metadata spying regime we would have discovered some examples of False flag’ events, such as for example:
Operation Gladio planning/committing crimes against humanity such as the murder of 80+ at Bologna railway station.
The planned attack on the USS Liberty and coverup.
Hitler’s planned crimes
and thus save the Jews and the rest.
The Gulf of Tonkin lies and the saving of 550 Aussie lives and the rest
Stopped 19 mad, Mostly Saudi Arabs going and doing three buildings with two planes on 911. (:-
Exposing and catching those who have covered up 911.
Exposed to the world ‘curve Ball’ and his lies about alleged biological moving laboratories being part of Powell’s deceit of the UN and making a fool of the Howard Goverment!
Ok, enough for now, come on Metadata, Brandis, do your job and catch those bastards whilst the rest of us Metadata contributors can feel safe from psychos out there.
As they say; nothing to hide, why hide?
Go for it Tony, all information be put on the record, including this observation.
I feel so safe with Mr Metadata!
Thank you Mr. Metadata, you are my family’s hero. Superman, you are so pass’e. To, Tony, Julie and the rest of our Aussie parliament: thank you for keeping us safe and bringing; peace and goodwill, Santa and democracy to;
Afghanistan, Iraq, Yemen, the Sudan, Somalia, Libya, Syria, The Ukraine, not to omit Lebanon and Iran. (They will get theirs!)
Merry Christ-mass to the heathens with all the best, from we, Gentiles/Goyin and Infadels.
May the bankers prosper with peace and democracy to all men of goodwill.
Amen.
Ned – great comment.
By the way ‘they’ know what you have got in your Xmas stocking before you – and before you even open it.
Well said Ned, love you 😀
I suppose that “they” are the very same people who planned all those other inside jobs right ?
Why is it that you always talk about “they” ? Didn’t those people get a name when they were born ?
If you’re so f*cking clever to unravel each and any “conspiracy” (according to you) then why is it so damn difficult to name these people ?
My guess is that you’re really not that clever after all right ?
In fact, it’s not a guess… It’s a fact.
Proof me wrong and give me some names for a change… instead of making complete idiots out of yourselves.
(except if you like to be called an idiot of course)
Well said Xing, love you to pieces 😀
Hello, we are “they”, pleased to meet you, hope you guessed our name 😀
You’re so right. I forgot that we are “they” 🙂
By the way, we still need a name for our newest covert op.
Would it be appropriate to name it “project Gumshoe”
Xing,
Request denied.
We are on the Tibet monks now.
The 8 Aboriginals are of no importance.
To them I say:
What’s puzzling you is the nature of our game.
Yours cinceraly,
We
You fancy polls when they are at your convenience, so here you have one from Wikipedea:
Most conspiracy theorists are males in their 20’s.
Dumb ass kids, reinventing old school stuff.
Why bother with us el kammoflage ??????? You are so niggled by the fact that you cannot come up with a similar B7. Still waiting.
There is always a first time to everything.
No she is over 80 and holds the title as Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth 11. Her Majesty’s Crown prosecutors put forward
conspiracy theories in all commonwealth countries to a jury nearly every day for a jury to decide a verdict on the evidence presented.
Pretty simple procedure……considering all the evidence, be it circumstantial or otherwise.
Try it some time.
PS. Her Majesty”s prosecutors are way over the age stupid Wikipedia cites and then many of them become judges.
Forget Wiki and also look up the studies to suggest that those who can pick a conspiracy at 20 paces are more intelligent and discerning than mugs who cannot.
Suggest: never go on a jury you will bore your colleagues to death by claiming that the prosecutor is just a 20 year old conspiracy theorist.
To all of our “they”,
Joe Cocker just died and it leaked.
All leaves are withdrawn.
“They” gave the order to cover up this event.
Report to your managers, leave nothing behind, pull your stations.
See you at the office for briefing.
We.
Who are they?
Examine:
G Edward Griffin on the new fascist control system: ‘Collectivism’. Same attributes as with communism, fascism, supremeism and all the other totalitarian control and anti-democratic systems.
Read up on Cass Sumstein who wants government to infiltrate those who question authorities’ propaganda.
Try the Bankers who issue currency for interest, paid by you (?) out of thin air and finance wars to bankrupt countries.
In history, ‘they’ have always been there. As kings with godlike Devine right, as plunderers, such as Ghengis Khan, the Spanish plundering the Aztecs, the slave merchants plundering Africa, even the money changers whipped at the Temple.
One can reasonably suggest that by ridicule the agents of ‘they’ bore us silly here with ignorance and distraction.
For actual names? Ever heard of the defamation laws to protect ‘they’?
Look up the present allegations stemming from the UK parliamentary paedophile club. ‘They’ are ripe to be blackmailed by ‘they’ who manipulate policy and warring/whoring.
Read the exposure from the Address on 20th March 1969 exposing they; the NWO. See Dr. Day. Note the plan to dumb down the populace by deting knowledge. Apparently, the agents of ‘they’, in some police candidature systems pass only if their IQ is below average. Congratulations to our vilifiers for having being selected on that basis.
‘They’ are those who promote totalitarianism withtheir toadies in support.
For some names of toadies, read up on the articles by Alan Sabrosky on 911.
Wishing all toads a plentiful supply of flies for 2015 and that they have sufficient stored away to survive with their family and are on Lilly pad far away pending ww111, as forecast in the writings of Albert Pike from the 19th century exposing plans for three world wars.
With all due respect to other posters here, anyone who thinks that the metadata of all Australians is not already being collected is a bit naive. According to Snowden and others, it’s already happening in the U.S. (Understand that “metadata” refers to such information as the phone numbers one calls and receives but not the actual contents of the phone calls.)
Equally naive is anyone who thinks that Man Haroon Monis was not being closely monitored and physically followed in all his movements. He was obviously an intelligence and propaganda asset ever since he arrived in Australia but even so, such people are closely monitored. And almost certainly the DETAILED data of several thousand Australians is also being collected. You don’t need an army of workers to do that with automated, computerized information management. That’s why the security industry is so interested in facial recognition software, because it can be combined with public video feed to automate a lot of this collection and monitoring work.
With this in mind,. the recent statement by the Police Commissioner about metadata was obviously a deceptive statement, meant to fool the public into thinking that Monis was not being monitored. This is a further indication that it was a staged event. “Staged” does not always mean that there were no casualties, for example, the 7/7 London bombings.
very good points persecuted2
Actually, I hearts many years back that such primitive’data collecting’ started just after WW11 by a private company that was bought out by a newspaper magnate and info was sold to assist employing the right compliant people in significant areas.
The police have had taps running for decades at central locations.
If you were naughty and found out then one progressed as one of The Team’.
Not that it was the only way to progress from the times of Cecil Rhodes with his scholarships provided for, in one of his wills.
Interesting study been done on that: ref; G Edwars Griffin and the development of ”think tank’ satellites around a central hub where ‘they’ plan their spin and control. Some even refer to themselves as ‘Institutes’. Funny what that term rhymes with.
Poor Johnny and co do not even know their masters!
Some further developments in the story as we expected.
These revelations are to be drowned in Christmas distractions.
http://www.news.com.au/national/man-haron-monis-may-have-fired-a-warning-shot-before-police-stormed-lindt-cafe/story-fncynjr2-1227160199220
May I have a quiet word with those who see the shills for what they are?
One of the most impressive film accounts of a battle, is portrayed in the film ‘Zulu’ depicting the battle of Fork’s Drift/Rift (sp: ?)
McKane was a lead with other greats of the early 60’s.
From memory, the battle produced over 11 VC’s.
Early in the staging for the battle. ‘Terrorists’ were firing captured weapons from the high covered ground. The on ground attackers stood in line at about 100 yards, (?) in line with animal hide shields and chanting. The defenders just shot them.
There is a comment to Mckane after his question; ‘what are they doing!? . The reply was to the affect: ‘the chiefs in the hills are counting our guns’
So it is with shills, they are counting the guns of truth.
As it was with the Zulus, the shills will depart……. When they realise that McKane and his defenders out shot the lot.
Shills; examine history, the goatskin shields cannot defend against courage and truth.
So that is the work of shills; to count the guns! (Metaphorically speaking)
Well shills, jump as high as the chiefs command and be shot whilst your masters sit safely in the hills.
Ned, I didn’t exactly follow your story above, but I think John Yoo has made a correct guess of the strength of truth and realizes he is in trouble as a result of the US Senate’s Torture Report. He is trying to backtrack on his 2002 Memo. Got to give him credit for his IQ there. His position is Law Profwessor at Berkeley.
[…] our time, an example of oppressive law, one that has led to the suicide of many Australian farmers, has to do with lending. If a farmer can’t pay the mortgage, a bank is legally able to force the […]