23 COMMENTS

  1. Hey, why knock Metadata?
    Metadata will help to expose all the lies that are used to trick shock jock commentators, mass media, expired arm chair generals and politicians from lying to the public to have them conditioned to spend lives and our tax dollars on wars invading and killing.
    With an efficient Metadata spying regime we would have discovered some examples of False flag’ events, such as for example:
    Operation Gladio planning/committing crimes against humanity such as the murder of 80+ at Bologna railway station.
    The planned attack on the USS Liberty and coverup.
    Hitler’s planned crimes
    and thus save the Jews and the rest.
    The Gulf of Tonkin lies and the saving of 550 Aussie lives and the rest
    Stopped 19 mad, Mostly Saudi Arabs going and doing three buildings with two planes on 911. (:-
    Exposing and catching those who have covered up 911.
    Exposed to the world ‘curve Ball’ and his lies about alleged biological moving laboratories being part of Powell’s deceit of the UN and making a fool of the Howard Goverment!
    Ok, enough for now, come on Metadata, Brandis, do your job and catch those bastards whilst the rest of us Metadata contributors can feel safe from psychos out there.
    As they say; nothing to hide, why hide?
    Go for it Tony, all information be put on the record, including this observation.
    I feel so safe with Mr Metadata!
    Thank you Mr. Metadata, you are my family’s hero. Superman, you are so pass’e. To, Tony, Julie and the rest of our Aussie parliament: thank you for keeping us safe and bringing; peace and goodwill, Santa and democracy to;
    Afghanistan, Iraq, Yemen, the Sudan, Somalia, Libya, Syria, The Ukraine, not to omit Lebanon and Iran. (They will get theirs!)
    Merry Christ-mass to the heathens with all the best, from we, Gentiles/Goyin and Infadels.
    May the bankers prosper with peace and democracy to all men of goodwill.
    Amen.

      • I suppose that “they” are the very same people who planned all those other inside jobs right ?

        Why is it that you always talk about “they” ? Didn’t those people get a name when they were born ?

        If you’re so f*cking clever to unravel each and any “conspiracy” (according to you) then why is it so damn difficult to name these people ?

        My guess is that you’re really not that clever after all right ?

        In fact, it’s not a guess… It’s a fact.

        Proof me wrong and give me some names for a change… instead of making complete idiots out of yourselves.

        (except if you like to be called an idiot of course)

      • You fancy polls when they are at your convenience, so here you have one from Wikipedea:
        Most conspiracy theorists are males in their 20’s.
        Dumb ass kids, reinventing old school stuff.

        • No she is over 80 and holds the title as Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth 11. Her Majesty’s Crown prosecutors put forward
          conspiracy theories in all commonwealth countries to a jury nearly every day for a jury to decide a verdict on the evidence presented.
          Pretty simple procedure……considering all the evidence, be it circumstantial or otherwise.
          Try it some time.

          • PS. Her Majesty”s prosecutors are way over the age stupid Wikipedia cites and then many of them become judges.
            Forget Wiki and also look up the studies to suggest that those who can pick a conspiracy at 20 paces are more intelligent and discerning than mugs who cannot.
            Suggest: never go on a jury you will bore your colleagues to death by claiming that the prosecutor is just a 20 year old conspiracy theorist.

  2. To all of our “they”,
    Joe Cocker just died and it leaked.
    All leaves are withdrawn.
    “They” gave the order to cover up this event.
    Report to your managers, leave nothing behind, pull your stations.
    See you at the office for briefing.

    We.

  3. Who are they?
    Examine:
    G Edward Griffin on the new fascist control system: ‘Collectivism’. Same attributes as with communism, fascism, supremeism and all the other totalitarian control and anti-democratic systems.
    Read up on Cass Sumstein who wants government to infiltrate those who question authorities’ propaganda.
    Try the Bankers who issue currency for interest, paid by you (?) out of thin air and finance wars to bankrupt countries.
    In history, ‘they’ have always been there. As kings with godlike Devine right, as plunderers, such as Ghengis Khan, the Spanish plundering the Aztecs, the slave merchants plundering Africa, even the money changers whipped at the Temple.
    One can reasonably suggest that by ridicule the agents of ‘they’ bore us silly here with ignorance and distraction.
    For actual names? Ever heard of the defamation laws to protect ‘they’?
    Look up the present allegations stemming from the UK parliamentary paedophile club. ‘They’ are ripe to be blackmailed by ‘they’ who manipulate policy and warring/whoring.
    Read the exposure from the Address on 20th March 1969 exposing they; the NWO. See Dr. Day. Note the plan to dumb down the populace by deting knowledge. Apparently, the agents of ‘they’, in some police candidature systems pass only if their IQ is below average. Congratulations to our vilifiers for having being selected on that basis.
    ‘They’ are those who promote totalitarianism withtheir toadies in support.
    For some names of toadies, read up on the articles by Alan Sabrosky on 911.
    Wishing all toads a plentiful supply of flies for 2015 and that they have sufficient stored away to survive with their family and are on Lilly pad far away pending ww111, as forecast in the writings of Albert Pike from the 19th century exposing plans for three world wars.

  4. With all due respect to other posters here, anyone who thinks that the metadata of all Australians is not already being collected is a bit naive. According to Snowden and others, it’s already happening in the U.S. (Understand that “metadata” refers to such information as the phone numbers one calls and receives but not the actual contents of the phone calls.)

    Equally naive is anyone who thinks that Man Haroon Monis was not being closely monitored and physically followed in all his movements. He was obviously an intelligence and propaganda asset ever since he arrived in Australia but even so, such people are closely monitored. And almost certainly the DETAILED data of several thousand Australians is also being collected. You don’t need an army of workers to do that with automated, computerized information management. That’s why the security industry is so interested in facial recognition software, because it can be combined with public video feed to automate a lot of this collection and monitoring work.

    With this in mind,. the recent statement by the Police Commissioner about metadata was obviously a deceptive statement, meant to fool the public into thinking that Monis was not being monitored. This is a further indication that it was a staged event. “Staged” does not always mean that there were no casualties, for example, the 7/7 London bombings.

    • Actually, I hearts many years back that such primitive’data collecting’ started just after WW11 by a private company that was bought out by a newspaper magnate and info was sold to assist employing the right compliant people in significant areas.
      The police have had taps running for decades at central locations.
      If you were naughty and found out then one progressed as one of The Team’.
      Not that it was the only way to progress from the times of Cecil Rhodes with his scholarships provided for, in one of his wills.
      Interesting study been done on that: ref; G Edwars Griffin and the development of ”think tank’ satellites around a central hub where ‘they’ plan their spin and control. Some even refer to themselves as ‘Institutes’. Funny what that term rhymes with.
      Poor Johnny and co do not even know their masters!

  5. May I have a quiet word with those who see the shills for what they are?
    One of the most impressive film accounts of a battle, is portrayed in the film ‘Zulu’ depicting the battle of Fork’s Drift/Rift (sp: ?)
    McKane was a lead with other greats of the early 60’s.
    From memory, the battle produced over 11 VC’s.
    Early in the staging for the battle. ‘Terrorists’ were firing captured weapons from the high covered ground. The on ground attackers stood in line at about 100 yards, (?) in line with animal hide shields and chanting. The defenders just shot them.
    There is a comment to Mckane after his question; ‘what are they doing!? . The reply was to the affect: ‘the chiefs in the hills are counting our guns’
    So it is with shills, they are counting the guns of truth.
    As it was with the Zulus, the shills will depart……. When they realise that McKane and his defenders out shot the lot.
    Shills; examine history, the goatskin shields cannot defend against courage and truth.
    So that is the work of shills; to count the guns! (Metaphorically speaking)

    • Ned, I didn’t exactly follow your story above, but I think John Yoo has made a correct guess of the strength of truth and realizes he is in trouble as a result of the US Senate’s Torture Report. He is trying to backtrack on his 2002 Memo. Got to give him credit for his IQ there. His position is Law Profwessor at Berkeley.

C'mon Leave a Reply, Debate and Add to the Discussion

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.