Minister Robb.
I again asked the Minister for Trade and Investment Andrew Robb’s office on Wednesday (4/2/15) whether the Minister has actually READ the detail in the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) document? I have not heard back. I have been asking this question for over a year.
I should be easy to answer (e.g. “Of course the Minister has read the document“) – but the same carefully worded sentence is always the reply.
“Mr Robb remains fully engaged with the negotiating process including on all chapters of the treaty.”
Mr Robb is obviously engaged in the negotiating process (his job) – but I can only assume now that the Minister has NOT READ the detail. And if the Honourable Minister has not – who in the Australian government has? Is is a real concern that (International) Corporate Kelptocrats are moulding the detail in their favour.
The GetUP campaign‘s production.
I will be happy to post an immediate update to the post – if or when his department confirms that he has read the document.
Minister Robb signing the Korea Australia Free Trade Agreement (KAFTA) in Seoul.
Dalia, last Halloween you posted an article about the Apollo Space Mission. It led Christopher Brooks to comment thusly:
“The aspect of the Apollo program and the many amazing achievements of mankind that collide with my sensibilities is the staggering contradictions between humanity’s capacity for courage and brilliance compared with the tragedy of the present world condition where genuine integrity and authenticity are far too scarce.”
Maybe we are spending too much time on this website lamenting what is instead of dreaming what could be.
Like Christopher I think what could be is going have in it a big piece of the human achievement-style of the past.
It is just so disgusting to read that this poor Robb creature doesn’t even claim to have read a treaty that he’s going to sign.
Good God.
I don’t think I can stand too much more of this awful news.
Mary, your sentiment recalling my statement reminds me of a comment I made to a Weekly Times article last week.
I comment was directed at me that I was a “glass half empty” kinda guy.
I responded suggesting that I know we honestly can achieve and deserve an abundant overflowing full glass and the masses have been deceived into accepting only half a glass.
A half empty glass and a half full glass are always just half a glass but Orwellian conditioned chants that fool ourselves into acceptance of less than a “cup run’th over” are just subliminal apologetics for not challenging how, who and why we must be satisfied with the wealth inequality and injustice that is very evident in Australia and beyond to extreme degrees.
It is only reasonable that as critics of the crimes and schemes of the Rothschild Gang we have explanations and solutions for a better path that are logical, convincing and CONSISTENT.
What if everyday on talk back, in article comments, letters to editors, political desks, journalists desks and in our wine bars the term “Rothschild Gang” was being spoken consistently with no apologies as the identifiable driver of the monopoly idea and it’s central methodology of the perversion of the money creation monopoly plus interest.
David Icke is possibly not my first reference choice for broad public discussions but his analysis here is generally very good.
http://investmentwatchblog.com/david-icke-detailing-the-rothschild-zionist-agenda-you-guys-gals-are-going-to-like-this/
This interview adds incredible intellectual understanding to the essence of the Rothschild Gang methods and tools.
The Rothschild Gang has everyone conditioned to only whisper their name in dark corners but we defeat ourselves if we are bluffed into not stating what is very evident, just rarely stated.
I guess my point here is we must identify and unravel the ugly core because the effects and symptoms are riddles and puzzles unless their pedigree and purpose explain the full perspective.
The GetUp report on the TPP is good, to a point, but a valid question is where is the complete picture and why is it not complete?
Compromise, ignorance, fear or deception?
We should be asking this question to it’s producers?
Dear Christopher, I realize it’s important to out the secrets of the past few centuries. (I say that even though, when I do the ‘outing,’ my friends do not believe me!) But the Andrew Robb behavior is truly a separate matter.
Let’s grant that there is a Bank-Emperor, or such, and that he deprives us of – as you say – having our cup runneth over.
It does seem that he controls the parliaments of all governments. It is shameful and shocking. Yet we can’t simply blame that Emperor. We should blame the (robotic) parliamentarians and the (puppet) presidents. Agree?
In a year’s worth of Gumshoe News, we have had Dalia harping on the following themes:
–Dr Karl of ABC won’t answer her scientific qq about the collapse of the WTC;
–Julie Bishop sucks up to the NATO guys, re MH17, turning Russia into a demon, so that we can justify a war;
–Tony Abbott went along with the lone gunman interpretation of the Sydney ‘siege,’ thus paving the way to a police state;
–Angela Merkel & Co posed for a picture seemingly to say that Muslims (distressed over a cartoon) killed Paris journalists.
What is wrong with these ‘creatures’? I am in the Liberal Party, and I felt bad referring to Robb as a creature, but it’s my ordinary understanding of the Oz democracy that he is absolutely required to think about the contents of a treaty and decide whether it’s what the nation wants. So how DARE he send the quoted letter to Dalia, acting like he does not take that to be his duty!
Similarly I ask: how DARE Dr Karl slink away from answering a question! Does Dr Karl understand that he is supporting a false flag? It has already had incredible medical consequences for Iraqi children (and PTSD for Australian soldiers).
I want to say explicitly that I never find it humorous, or sophisticated when these pollies twist their answers to public questions. (Really, Gillard is the genius in this area). I say they are being wicked, wicked, wicked. Repeat: wicked.
So, get the Rothschilds if you can, Christopher – but you probably CAN’T. These creatures are blocking the way. They are enslaving us. They are killing us. Re the American Congress, I found it easy to ‘indict’ the lot of them for treason, in my book Prosecution for Treason. It isn’t quite so easy to stick it to Canberra, but recall my article on Oct 7, 2014: “Who Should Be Tried for Treason?” I cited the Commonwealth Criminal Code Part 5.1, Division 80.1:
“(1) A person commits an offence, called treason, if the person:… (d) levies war, or does any act preparatory to levying war, against the Commonwealth….
(2) A person commits an offence if the person:
(b) knowing that another person intends to commit treason, does not inform a constable of it within a reasonable time or use other reasonable endeavours to prevent the commission of the offence. Penalty: Imprisonment for life.”
Let the creatures answer for their putting us in extreme danger (OK, and for the cup-runneth-over thing, if you insist). I hereby implore them: Stop your wickedness! Do NOT suck up to NATO. The ‘Emperor’ has NATO as his Pretorian guard, for cripes’ sake.
Christopher, at the end of your Feb 9, 5.13am discourse, above (which makes sense to me), you mention “their” powerfully-designed emotion-filled causes. I presume the Bali bombings, the Port Arthur massacre, and the Sydney siege are examples. Australia’s emotions needed some tweaking, eh?
Was a mother-of-three singled out to be killed in Martin Place, to make the event more emotion-filled? She is said to have died from “many ricocheting bullets.” Don’t we have SAS marksmen who would have shot the one-and-only target, Man Haron Monis, with a good shot? (I note that an earlier report, in the mainstream media, said Mrs Dawson died “later at hospital, from a heart attack.”)
If perchance I am right, how was the final scene organized, in Sydney at 2am on December 16, 2014? Who decided that no SAS marksman would go in and do the job cleanly? Or that pepper-spray would not be used? Who actually runs New South Wales?
I never had the impression during the siege that Prime Minister Abbott was making any decisions. He seemed to defer to the “authorities.” Wow. So in future crises, we shouldn’t expect elected leaders to make crucial decisions. It will be handed over to “security experts.”
Christopher, I don’t recall if it’s you or Ned that keeps throwing the Bologna railway bombing at us. In that case, it was proven in court that the bombing was done by Gladio (a subset of NATO) for purposes of causing a stir. Fancy that. Dozens of Italians killed so their countrymen can be stirred against ‘terrorism.’ Must we be so pathetic as to tolerate this?
Would Dalia be willing to write her usual letter (to which she gets the Dr Karl bedbug answer) to see who made the decision as to how “the storming of the chocolate café” would proceed? I mean, just to ascertain the chain of command.
One more thing. I recall from Lawrence Dunegan, MD’s report of the Dr Day speech, which can be found on Gumshoe December 27, 2014: “Most people don’t understand how governments operate and even people in high positions in governments don’t really understand how and where decisions are made.” Christopher, do you think any Canberra pollie knows? I think Robert Menzies knew and that he handed the country over.
In my experience politicians will not engage on the taboo subjects relating to the Rothschild Gang, money realities and all “National security” issues so it is very difficult to know exactly what they do and don’t know. Isn’t this an incredible situation!
I think we can change this situation with better time resources and some exacting correct strategic action.
The time, which is part an economic issue, is the limiting factor because the evidence, experience and technology available is up to the task.
A patient well planned approach is essential that could integrate multiple competent constituents and intelligent media.
Eg, one might begin with a questionnaire to all your MP’s on your target subject announcing a planned documentary project for public consumption. The key is to get responses on the public record.
The “We Are Change” approach has some instructive insights.
As far as I have discovered, many politicians are very narrow in their real economic knowledge but highly skilled in distracting conversations and remembering their next urgent appointment.
They have well trained staff to help them with “problems”.
Christopher, Thank you for saying “Isn’t this an incredible situation?”
As for your reading of the pollies, I can’t fault it at all. Yet some among the Brethren have to be clued in, in order for the plans to go smoothly.
Get this: a few days ago in the US, a new Appeals judge was approved (senate confirmation requires 51%). He supports Obama killing US citizens with drones. How can this be? It’s not a piece of legislation, in which a senator could fear critism if he doesn’t take the law-and-order approach. It was merely a confirmation of a judge. How could 51 Americans be so lacking in respect for their great Constitution?
For that matter, how can that new judge have kept his seat on the faculty of Harvard Law School? What ever happened to tarring and feathering? Whatever happened to common sense?
In my experience, most of these political puppets are incredibly naive along with their staff and our journalists.
They genuinely do not understand the money creation trick.
Unless the money question is understood then the debt crisis and the force towards concentration and integration appears to be a natural and the only option.
If someone is possessed by a cult they are more victim than deliberately evil.
We have to break the spell that dominates the communities mindset by explaining the who, how, effect and options for a vastly different economic outcome that would release the potential for abundance and choices that under the spell these people have never ever imagined was possible.
The money monopoly and relative beneficiaries according to proximity and supportive association with the printing press operations can only be unraveled with a complete account of the Rothschild Gang’s history and their systemic method of selective promotion, rewards, fame and privilege according to the value offered and delivered to those with greater power in the hope of gaining more power.
This “Masonic” type possession of incremental privilege in exchange for loyalty and advancement is the ABC of power which is manifest evil but those possessed are blinded until the spells are broken by being rescued through intellectually and logically shaking people out of their Zombie state.
The Cult is designed with all the protective security layers that money can buy to keep threatening knowledge isolated but I know my own mind can be bluffed into a passive and defeatist mindset if I choose an easy “diplomatic” option over the complete truth when discussing any issue..
If I exclude the Rothschild Gang, their money printing monopoly and their psychological victim-hood Auschwitz lies it could be argued I am corrupt.
The technical facts are all in our possession so the task is to be able to open peoples minds so they start to listen which is not easy when it is a zombie mindset that is under possession but if i am going to the trouble I am always going to dish up the full story and not just part of it if I get the opportunity.
I always state the “Rothschild gang” imposes it’s “money trick” with “sorcery” to progress the “monopoly idea” towards dominating and controlling mankind under sophisticated slavery which includes regular wars as and economic convulsions as essential strategy.
I challenge people very directly to point out where I am wrong and why would any rational honest person accept this reality?
I know that breaking the spell requires a type of shock treatment that forces peoples minds to accept a logical contradiction to the false narrative which then destroys the resistance to all my information.
Every person and group has variable vulnerable subjects and interests that we have to identify and exploit to break the spell over their mind to restart independent thinking.
Due to the the nature of our mind the spell needs reinforcing challenge over a concentrated period.
The anti-thesis of this is the repeated false world views, fake fear crisis, “religious” retreats, intensive business sales seminars, powerfully designed emotion filled causes and much more that shut down the independent thinking method.
If we can understand the science of persuasion and mind control we can better know how to reverse the effect.
My thoughts a wandering here but I offer them free.
Christopher – I think you are right in your point, that until you understand that the world is governed entirely by a “money trick” it is almost impossible to put perspective on anything else.
I have discussed this with accountants – and they try explain that it is not a trick… no that’s how money works…
And not even taking into account exponential growth on the trick. Reminded again playing monopoly…. once one player has a couple of hotels on high paying properties—it’s game over.
Monopoly rules are a deception.
If monopoly reflected how money works the “Banker” only gives players money as debt with interest and their is no limit on how much can be loaned.
Beyond question the banker wins every time and controls the whole game because it is mathematically rigged and no other result is possible until the rules are changed.
The Monopoly game entrenches the mythology of “markets” and “commerce” when in fact the system is a debt money dictatorship.
Yes thanks for pointing that out. Yes…. absolutely right. My reference was to the imbalance AFTER the trick. (There are only a fixed amount of play money. The reality is very different.) By the way your thoughts on how an individual can challenge the money trick?
Do you mean in terms of breaking the spell over your accountants mind?
Dave Hodges in the US has raised this TPP nightmare and ties it in with the Western ports troubles, as the ships are not unloading. That means supplies to the US of various goods is well behind schedule and could cause hardship.
The Baltic Dry Index is at one of its lowest ever levels. Some day the msm financial journalists will actually wake up to what that means and tell you
Just search ‘Dave Hodges The Common Sense Show’ and the last few aticles.
One has to hope he is wrong.
The dealings over there fit in with the secrecy of our government in regard to the TPP proposals……………. which are basically to result in the global corporates usurping our sovereignty.
Sorry if I distracted everyone, just go back to the cricket and see the Irish do a clean sweep? (:-}