Sandy Hook, Part 10: In the Light of the Marathon Bombing

[Editor’s note: Benson Kipruto, a Kenyan, was first cross the finish line today in the 125th Boston Marathon]

by Mary W Maxwell, LLB

I wish to bring this series of Sandy Hook articles to a satisfactory close, soon.  I can’t stand an unsolved mystery. In fact, why don’t I come to it right now — I believe Sandy Hook did not involve actual deaths of actual children. There, that’s it!

As you know, I believed for the last 9 years that it was a true story. That’s mainly because I didn’t look into it.  If you look into it, it’s hard to accept as real. Meanwhile, whilst I was ignoring Newtown Connecticut (the site of Sandy Hook school), I was studying Boston. That taught me a thing or two.

So now in Part 10, I will explicitly try to persuade my audience that 2012 Sandy Hook is fake, just as the 2013 Laurel St shootout connected to the Boston bombing was fake. As to whether a bomb really went off on Boylston St, I imagine it did, but that is not part of my investigation. I came in through the door of the court in the 2015 Tsarnaev trial and have worked on Jahar’s innocence.

Oops, now that I think of it, I came in at least by July 2014, when I attended the Jury Instructions in the case of two friends of Jahar Tsarnaev at Boston federal courthouse. At that point I did not even realize how surreal it was for these college kids to be sentenced to prison for — wait for it — “lying to the FBI.”

(Seriously, can you even lie to the FBI?)

Sandy Hook Similarities

Before expounding about Boston, let me lay out some of its relevant connections to Newtown.

1. The “Sandy Hook massacre” (December 14, 2012) took place four months before the Marathon (April 15, 2013) and may have been a try-out to see how much a hoaxer can get away with. The networks and CNN went ahead with assertions about Adam Lanza as though no one could doubt it. All details were provided — how he shot through the front door, what kind of weapons and ammo he carried, how the parents were made to wait a long time for details, and so forth.

Remember, as of this article today, I am taking the position that there were no actual parents of deceased children.  The whole thing is fictional, it exists in words but not in the flesh. However, the perps would have measured the public’s resistance as being rather weak, so they could proceed to do the Boston thing uninhibited. Even now, eight years after the Marathon, resistance is so weak that the perps have been able to commit the Covid Vaccine scam with impunity.

2. Both Sandy Hook and Boston were false flags. This means that an evil deed is carried out and the blame is placed on someone whom we want to set up for punishment. In 1990, another false flag involved the report that Saddam Hussein’s troops had thrown babies out of their incubators “onto the cold floor of the hospital” and thus the US was justified in attacking Iraq over its supposed invasion of Kuwait. The conveyor of that story was play-acting.  She spoke to Congress, claiming to be an Iraqi nurse, but she was really the daughter of the Kuwaiti ambassador to the US.

Adam Lanza stood for gun-owners, who were to be demonized. Jahar Tsarnaev stood for Muslim terrorists who have been getting demonized since the 1970s. Once the public “understands” that gun owners and Muslims “throw babies out of their incubators”, anyone who pleads for merciful treatment of them will find herself castigated. She is a disloyal American, a radical, or a tinfoil hatter.

3. Both at Boston and at Sandy Hook, there had to have been large numbers of people who were “in on it.” This in itself makes it difficult for any ordinary citizen to accept that there is fakery in the air. You naturally reckon “It must have happened, as there are so many who watched it and would yell if the media was lying.”

At both sites, there had to have been police, doctors, and media all of whom had prior knowledge of what would occur, in order to perform their specific task, or at least play dumb.  Non-participants had to be kept out of the action area, as they may have upset the whole activity. Not to worry, though, if someone really threatens to blow the story, he can be killed by heart attack, car accident, etc.

The Smoking Guns at Boston

Let me just name two smoking guns of the Marathon story.  These are widely known and should cause any good Bostonian to put his foot down and say “This story is false. I refuse to go along with it.”

The first is the plainly visible arrest of Tamerlan Tsarnaev, age 26, in Watertown, Massachusetts in the wee hours of Friday, April 19, 2013. There are two perfect videos. In one, taken on Mt Auburn St at roughly 1:05 am, Tamerlan is not easily viewed but his voice is clear.  As the cop is asking for his ID, Tamerlan realizes he is a patsy.  He yells “Podstava”. –  Russian for “It’s a set-up.” (That video was shot by a local, named “Big Headphones.”) A better visual can be had from CNN (as shown above) which shows him being escorted to a police car, naked and unwounded.

The reason Tamerlan’s arrest is a smoking gun is that it ruins the whole thrust of the “Muslim terrorist bomber” story. That story depended on the brothers having been in a shootout with police at approximately 12:35 am on Laurel St. I believe a sub-patsy was used. This is, I think an innocent young man was substituted for Tamerlan on Laurel St and died there. (Sgt John McLellan stated, at my 2018 Watertown Library lecture, that he saw a guy bleed to death on Laurel St.)

The second smoking gun of the Marathon is the so-called confession written by Jahar Tsarnaev on the wall of a dry-docked boat. It is absurd. For one thing, he had no instrument with which to write it, and for another thing, it speaks of Tamerlan as having gone to heaven when, according to the official story, Jahar could not have known Tamerlan was dead. It is also written in a formal religious style that Jahar never used. Had an honest defense lawyer knocked down that piece of false evidence at Jahar’s trial, the audience would have seen that the boy was being framed. Instead, he was sent to Death Row.

There are other smoking guns at Boston, such as the claim by the hugely injured Jeff Bauman (in his book, Stronger) that he had told the ambulance driver that he had locked eyes with Tamerlan and suspected him of the bombing. (What hooey!) And there’s the deceptive film White Hat, produced by National Geographic, that used Alex Karavay to play the part of Jahar placing a bomb. It has a voice-over with FBI saying the film came from a surveillance camera at one of the Boylston St shops.

The Smoking Guns at Newtown

Needless to say, it is up to any person to pick his own faves among the available smoking guns in relation to the Sandy Hook affair. Mine are rather abstract. Thus, I don’t rely on “moldy walls in the school building which proves it was not an operative school.”  Nor do I care for the pitch that “children who closely resemble the deceased children were seen in a choir at the 2013 Superbowl.”

And I find it worthless evidence that the FBI national report of murders in 2012 did not list any occurring in the relevant area of Connecticut. Also, I hope to be forgiven for not denying the massacre on the grounds that Lanza was too small-built to carry all the guns and ammo he is supposed to have been found with. Perhaps it all matters but most of those bits don’t grab me.

By the way, I not only am not worried about the giggling by a parent (Robbie Parker) after the tragedy, or the histrionics by Gene Rosen. I think those were thrown in to cause doubt and thus be a barometer of how serious was the vaccine hesitancy of the day — so to speak.  Same for the loose tourniquet on Jeff Bauman’s leg at the Marathon. Many people talked about it, but none did anything about it, so it must have been deemed safe for the “authorities” (that is, the Boston Globe) to continue to prattle on.

My best smoking gun at Sandy Hook is the iconic photo.  The journalist from the Newtown Bee, Shannon Hicks, does claim to have taken it on the day — December 14, 2012.  But it was not taken on that day, and it’s not a scene of children escaping.  It is a posed shot. Furthermore, there are other shots taken by her minutes later in which the director (the alleged policewoman in the photo) is re-arranging the order of kids to get a better “congo line.”

Had there been an error by which the wrong item from Ms Hick’s collection of photos got sent out to the whole world, there could have been a humble retraction by the big media. But no, to this day they speak of it as the escape photo

To please those who want me to cite a more nitty-gritty forensic issue, I hereby offer the lack of any blood stains in the school as proof that no shooting occurred.

A comprehensive fave of mine is the attacks on James Tracy who lost his job for calling the massacre a hoax and the physical attack on Wolf Halbig in his Florida home. Both episodes were completely uncalled for. Tracy’s university could have just published a statement that it does not agree with his “nincompoop” ideas about a Sandy Hook hoax.  And Halbig could have received a letter in the mail telling him there is a prosecution pending against him for harassing a parent (or whatever it was they were charging him with).

Using aggression, instead, tells me that the real perps wanted to sew up the problem of critics by scaring everyone off. They don’t scare me because, at 74, I’m Nearer My God to Thee anyway, and because I am so vainglorious as to believe I can get the law to prevail. S’truth!

Finally, there is the out-and-out censorship issue. James Fetzer has lost his ability to make an income by selling books, per the edict of Amazon, and the Connecticut legislature has discussed the possibility of criminalizing any criticism of Sandy Hook. I am very suspicious of the fact that the SSDI closed down all public access to data about deaths. Now we won’t be able to find out if George Washington and Abe Lincoln really died. Oh, well.

I have said that a cause of these false flags may have been to set up enemies — be they gun owners or Muslims. But another purpose is to reduce us to uncritical idiots.  And I think a further purpose, now that we have YouTube and other fora for conspiracy-theorizing, is to make us throw up our hands in frustration.  We can state the truth — Jahar’s boat-wall confession is a crock — and yet face serious magazines such as The New Yorker telling us that the boat-wall confession reveals Jahar’s inner love for Allah and jihadism type thing.

After a while you say “There is no standard to measure truth — it’s all relative.”  In fact, you may eventually resign yourself to the notion that it is morally OK to promote fake stories if it be for a good cause. Setting up a straw man named Adam Lanza helps us face the fact that guns are dangerous (blood or no). Creating Middle-East complected men as the enemy helps us steal oil from their part of the world, and we all need our oil don’t we?

The Tragedy and Treachery of the Judiciary

In this Part 10 article I have cast my vote for the hoax theory of Sandy Hook. Personally, what gets me down the most is the sellout by the judiciary.  In Boston I have been squawking for years about the wrongful trial of Jahar. Sure, the prosecutor — the DoJ — and the Public Defender did everything wrong.  And witnesses lied like there was no tomorrow. But whatever they did could have been thwarted by an honest judge

So far in the Sandy Hook case there have been opportunities for judges to afford the truthers the opportunity to present their case and stick up for the right. As mentioned in Part 4, a judge in Florida made a summary judgement against James Tracy in his wrongful-firing case. (Tracy should have made it explicitly a constitutional case re freedom of speech, I ween.)

In Connecticut, the judge in Soto v Remington could have asked why Remington Bushmaster made a $33 million offer of settlement before discovery. In Wisconsin the lower court judge could have seen to it that James Fetzer got a go at discovery before rendering a decision that Fetzer had defamed Leonard Pozner, to the tune of $450,000 — and so forth.

I think they are all in it.  This is tragic beyond belief. If we have lost our courts, we have also lost the ability to rely on the law. Powerful people can exploit us to their heart’s content — nuttin’ to stop ’em. No matter how egregious an injustice you have suffered, there will be no place to go to get retribution, much less be paid damages. It will be a free for all, a veritable Hobbesian state of nature.

I call upon the folks of Massachusetts and Connecticut to stop what they are doing via their passive acceptance of false stories, which then invite outrageous court judgements. Come on, is it so hard to say “I have seen Tamerlan naked and looking mighty buff and I don’t believe for a minute that he had just been run over by an SUV”?  Or “That iconic photo of the children at Sandy Hook did not document any escape from a massacre, and I won’t tolerate CBS continuing to pretend that it did”?

You can do it.  I know you can do it. Just do it.  Say: Jahar is innocent, and Nobody died at Sandy Hook.