by Mary W Maxwell, LLB
I graduated from Adelaide Law School in 2011, as a mature age student, in a state of deep ignorance. Part of that can be blamed on the law school whose teachers never once, in my earshot, mentioned the corruption of the courts.
I can see why they wouldn’t mention it. Law is a very valuable thing. A law school must celebrate the beauty of law. Teachers must instill in students a great respect for the law itself and for jurisprudence (the rationale of judges’ decisions). Naturally, they would convey reverence for judges of the past and be eager to show approval of present-day judges.
I believe the main reason for a law teacher to refrain from lecturing on corruption is that other law teachers are silent on it. Fear of sticking out, or of not conforming to the culture, is surely the strongest motivator for people, in any group, to remain silent.
To speak out about court corruption is specifically the responsibility of anyone who teaches law. If we have corrupt courts, isn’t that going to affect your students’ subsequent legal career, on a daily basis?
The Underworld
I suppose that any big city has an underworld engaging in crime. Originally, theft may have been the simplest crime for which a collaboration of persons could be effective. A notable habit of the Mafia is to thieve from every shopkeeper in town by asking them to pay “Protection.” The shopkeeper will pay because she cannot know how many strongmen are out there to punish her if she balks at paying.
(I once got an eyeful, accidentally, when I entered the wrong door of a pizzeria. I found myself in the kitchen, where the owner, whom I knew to be quite the bully, was acting like a whimpering sissy in the face of some Protection collectors.)
The underworld grew in the 20th century, owing to the illegality of stuff that some people desire — gambling, prostitution, quick loans, etc. For mafias to make their living purveying these illegal goods, they would need to bribe cops, mayors, and others. We all know that.
The Hoity-Toity Underworld
But I’m not here to discuss the low-grade underworld. I am thinking of something that is directed from the top. Let me refer to its members as “hoity-toity” types. Most would be found on “the Mayor’s A-List” in Australian capital cities. And the issue I am coming to is child sex trafficking. It is in that realm that we have discovered court corruption to a fantastic extent.
The hoity-toity underworld necessarily includes judges, as they are the final blockage point to getting justice. I hear you ask “Who is above them”? If they are misbehaving it’s got to be because someone is protecting them.
Ah, thereby hangs a tale, but we won’t get to it today.
Bagmen? What Bagmen?
A nice girl like me (practically sequestered in a convent!) would normally be unaware of the phenomenon of bagmen. I do recall reading in Kathleen A Sullivan’s book Unshackled, that she was a pre-bagman. Skilled in the use of a knife, she worked for the CIA. If a covert operator died in circumstances that must be hidden, she would cut up the body and put the body parts in bags. I suppose she wasn’t, strictly speaking, the bagman — an accomplice had to dispose of the bags.
But then Rachel Vaughan came into my life. She explained how her late father, Max McIntyre, was the bagman for people who killed children and teenagers in Adelaide. Being a psychopath, he was also the killer in some of the cases. I must say I hadn’t thought of bagging as a regular occupation, but you can see the need. If a surreptitious murder is occurring, you don’t want the body to show up in a morgue.
Much later, we heard that British prime minister Sir Edward Heath disposed of “used boys” by throwing them off his boat. (This has not been proved, but police have said they are blocked from investigating — which is almost proof enough.)
Hoity-Toity Kidnap
The child sex trafficking under discussion in this article refers to kids who get trafficked for use by the hoity-toity set. In NSW, Fiona Barnett says she was trafficked both in Australia and overseas, but I am talking only about the local scene. I suppose you could just say the kids are “kidnapped.”
The thesaurus provides the following synonyms for kidnap: capture, abduct, ravish, steal, impress, pirate, hijack, nobble, snatch. The initial act of snatching the children is criminal enough. The further criminal acts consist of raping them, terrifying them, destroying the formation of their minds, and in some cases ending their lives.
We know, from such famous examples as that of Jeffrey Epstein and Prince Andrew, that the abduction of girls for sex is considered acceptable within elite circles. The person’s ability to afford sex activity, financially, is taken to mean that he’s entitled to seek it.
Members of the hoity-toity set no doubt require others “down the line” to assist in procuring the girls (pilots of Epstein’s planes?). All of these helpers must be shielded from police action. Rarely, though, does it come to prosecution — so judges don’t get seen as corrupt for letting such people off the hook.
South Australia’s Youth Court As Kidnapper
Now please switch your attention away from the court-as-convictor of criminals to court-as-kidnapper. I am positing as corrupt the Youth Court of South Australia, with regard to child sex trafficking. Quite possibly the purpose of the Youth Court is to enable kidnapping by certain people.
I may be wrong. I have not been able to discuss it with any member of the court – maybe they would persuade me that my deductions are not justified. (Indeed, I invite them to contact me now with corrections; I will amend the record and humbly apologize as needed.)
As described in my book Reunion, I think the dirty scheme goes like this: Someone out in the field chooses a kid for kidnap, in order that the kid may be used by the powerful for sex purposes. Legal action is then taken to remove the child from its parents, or more typically, from one Protective parent who has accused the other parent of sexually abusing the child.
The legal action consists of the state asking for custody or guardianship of the child. The parent, typically the mother, is labelled a mental case (even if there is zero evidence of it), and that’s said to be reason enough to remove the child. After all, a kid is in danger when living with a mental Mum, right?
I do agree that a psychotic parent is a risk to a kid’s development — over the centuries many a child has likely been harmed in that way. But if you examine transcripts of the Youth Court, you will see that, time and again, a mother is absolutely prevented from proving her mental wellness. The rules of evidence are not given any harbor in this court.
Secret information in the file of the Department of Child Protection will be bandied about, calling Mum every name in the book. Startlingly, every lawyer in Adelaide — no exceptions — will advise her that there is not going to be a happy ending. She will lose custody, and also lose guardianship!
Off goes the kid to meet his/her fate in the thriving trade of child sex and child pornography.
How the Youth Court Describes Itself
The Youth Court is arguably not a real court, at least insofar as it doesn’t even give lip service to due process. It is more like an administrative arm of government. According to the website courts.sa.gov.au:
“The Youth Court of South Australia was established under the Youth Court Act 1993 and hears matters in relation to criminal offending, child protection, adoption and surrogacy. … [Here we are not concerned with child offending, adoption or surrogacy – only with child protection] The Court is presided over by the Judge [or Magistrate]. All Youth Court hearings are closed to the public….
“The Children and Young People (Safety) Act 2017 establishes the Youth Court’s Care and Protection jurisdiction, which empowers the Court to hear Applications relating to the care and protection of children and young people.”
A citizen may assume from that, that any person can become a litigant if they have a relevant issue needing adjudication in the Youth Court. But it appears that only the government initiates “applications.” Specifically, it is the Crown Prosecutor who starts the case. Note: the DPP – Director of Public Prosecutions — stays well away. This whole thing is a sleight-of-hand operation, in my view. Again, from courts.sa.gov.au:
“If it is considered that a child is at risk and that court orders are appropriate to protect the child from harm, the Minister for Child Protection [currently Rachel Sanderson MP] or Chief Executive of the Department for Child Protection [currently Cathy Taylor] may apply to the Court for care and protection orders. ….
“The Court has power to make orders regarding the guardianship of the child, … and any consequential orders that the Court thinks fit. [However] the Court does not have the power to make orders regarding the parents’ access with the child, these decisions sit with the Chief Executive of the Department for Child Protection.” [Emphasis added]
Holy cow! A court that can’t act on the most essential issue – the rescue of a kid from sex slavery!
Pretend you are a Protective parent and the DCP has removed your child (forcibly) from your excellent, non-psychotic home. You will, of course, want to have that arbitrary – criminal! – action undone. But there’s apparently nowhere for you to go. The Youth Court has been designed, from at least 2017, to bar you from pleading your case. It is a FACT that your little boy or girl is going to get raped. Can you bring that to the ordinary authorities as a criminal matter? No. You are barred.
I repeat the title of this article: “South Australia’s Underworld Includes Killers, Bagmen, Child Molesters, Police, Lawyers, and Judges.” As I have often claimed, it is the judges that really matter – they let the others get away with the various crimes involved.
Am I sorry to be ratting on my own state, South Australia (where I lived from 1980 till recently)? Yes, yes, of course. But I feel we have to take action somewhere, and the set-up of the SA Youth Court is a dead give-away as to the real plan. Other writers have shown an exact set-up in Hartford Connecticut and Manchester, England, whereby a government agency grabs a kid on a ludicrous claim of harm-by-the-parent. (In a video with Shaun Attwood, we hear a British critic, Willard Wong tell an identical story.)
In sum, I claim that judges are supporting what I called the hoity-toity underworld. It is a dire, dire situation. The child’s life can never be made good again. Please help!
Are you a lawyer in Australia? Send me an email and I will tell you more. Dee McLachlan and I have collected a huge amount of proof of what I have argued here. It must stop!
Are you a judge in Australia? Are you sick and tired of seeing your colleagues living in such a fantasy world?
Are you a law professor in Australia? I realize you are possibly unaware of the whole game. Oops, I mean you were unaware of it – but now you’re in the loop.
Are you on the Mayor’s A-List and did not know that your comrades engage in such dark things?
Are you a cop? Go to your father, or your pastor, and ask for advice. Plenty of cops have said they hate collecting the kid forcibly from the home. Well, you would, wouldn’t you?
This horrendous stuff must stop. You must stop it! Come on, Adelaide, save the world! These anti-child crimes are going on everywhere, albeit with local variations. (E.g., in Connecticut, doctors seem to have a hand in the criminal kidnaps.) Thousands of people have written comments to websites saying the CPS (child protection service) kidnap routine is blatant.
I will be waiting for your email, dear professionals – preferably before sundown. Gimme your phone number and I’ll ring you, if you wish to chat.
Here we go — MaxwellMaryLLB@gmail.com — resident of New Hampshire, which is 13.5 hours behind the loveliest state in Australia.
This is an important article. If you wish to talk about COVID-19 it will be appreciated if you place your comment under the previous article (about Angela Merkel) or new articles on this topic.
Start at 40 seconds and see the two cops push the unwilling arrestee into the paddy wagon.
I am not sure what law he broke but I’ll assume the arrest was kosher. Now imagine an 8 year old child screaming and wrestling to avoid being bundled into a car by two SA cops who have taken her from Mum.
Think I’m kidding? Not kidding. Question: What law did she break?
“Statutory Guidelines
In all Care and Protection matters, the paramount consideration is to ensure that children and young people are protected from harm. In addition, the Children and Young People (Safety) Act 2017 provides the following further considerations in the administration of the Act:
The child’s need to be heard and have their needs considered;
The child’s need for love and attachment; [SERIOUSLY]
The child’s need for self-esteem;
The child’s need to achieve their full potential;
The importance of early intervention;
The child’s personal views on the matter...."
The Youth Court is completely in breach here. The child is never consulted — even when there is a taxpayer-paid ICL in the courtroom (I think they have to use the initials ICL, because to say the words out openly –“Independent Childrens Lawyer” would reveal the incongruity.)
That lawyer will never meet the child. After all, to meet the child would be to hear the child’s side of the story and, under the rules of the Hoity-toity Underworld that I am presenting today, we can’t have that!!!!
Dear Law Students, don’t be fooled. Just because you see the words in the legislation does not mean anybody in authority feels bound by them.
If you want the law to work, if you want to help your client, you have to … [Gumshoe readers, please complete that sentence.]
As a start.
Refer articles here at gumshoe on the topic to all your fellow students, and add anyone else you are in contact with.
This same corruption is why no lawyer will look into the fiasco of the Port Arthur massacre. Independent researchers have found evidence or lack thereof, but nobody wants to touch it.
Who can you trust today to set up a system with the child’s best interests at heart that does not have an ulterior motive in mind? Who can you trust when the whole rotten edifice is corrupted to the core and controlled via gatekeepers put in place to exercise their ‘authority’ to keep the lid on the boiling pot?
In my opinion, the whole system needs to be exposed first, as Trump is doing, and then when the folks realize just how rotten it all is, the guilty need to be made accountable and the ‘system’ revised to include many checks and balances that will at least keep the would be wrongdoers out.
Those office holders such as judges and police chiefs need to be elected and subject to recall when things they are in control of head south – government should never be in a position that it can put into place judges and others in positions of authority and who have been vetted to favor any ideological viewpoint that does not uphold the requirement of the Law of the Land.
In short, we need to tear it all down and start again!
Agree, been trying to communicate that for years. However, although I’m a combat vet, I’m too damn old to get down and dirty. Gawd forbid, any change is going to have to happen from the PC crowd of 57 genders. – The future is for the young, it is their problem.
Terry – the ‘Heinz crowd’ are a direct product of the system that we would like to see destroyed. That exposure will come as a greater shock to them than to us old farts, especially when the shyte hits the fan, as it most surely will, and soon.
The ‘Heinz crowd’ will be left world less – they will have a lot of soul searching to do.
Shaun Atwood. Wilfred Wong You tube
Proof that Satanic Ritual Abuse is Real (ft. Shaun Atwood & Wilfred Wong)
YouTube · 387 views · 30/03/2020 · by Alexander Bell
Satanism, Savile And Battling Darkness: Wilfred Wong | True Crime Podcast 89
YouTube · 102,000+ views · 30/03/2020 · by Shaun Attwood
Shaun Atwood. Wilfred Wong You tube
OK, this bottom one is what I was looking for, thanks Diane.
(Diane is a survivor of all this stuff in England and Oz, I believe.)
At 48.58, Wong starts in on the Family Court for 10 minutes. I insist that everyone invest the ten minutes.
Good news — in order to deal with the Youth “Court”, we do not have to accomplish a full conquest of the Satanist addiction. We have only to get citizens and half-decent solicitors to acknowledge the heavy lying that goes on there every day. I am sure some moms have committed suicide from the pain of seeing a “legitimate” institution take their kid(s) away.
The frickin’ Youth Court is not legitimate. It is part of a criminal syndicate. Come on, lawyers you can absorb that concept into your brain, can’t you?
Another brilliant and much needed article Mary. This subject desperately needs greater scrutiny. I have posted links to MANY Gumshoe articles on a couple of Shaun’s recent interviews. Wilfred Wong is another one of my heros, along with GumGum.
Wilfred is great
Rachel Mary what happened to Rachel’s interview with Shaun-there one minute gone the next, Brilliant evidence Rachel you are amazing.
https://www.google.com/search?q=Shaun+Attwood+Interview+with+Rachel+vaughn&client=safari&rls=en&sxsrf=ALeKk00qPX5Dqj8yUy2ebkYWsxjnSps0cQ:1587986670685&tbm=isch&source=iu&ictx=1&fir=fXe_y7OvdT0FLM%253A%252Cx8QBzHBJ0yhkaM%252C_&vet=1&usg=AI4_-kTeQG2Ii9lWrsj6MkaH6aqYtULgZg&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi94qerv4jpAhUEyzgGHWJXCa4Q9QEwB3oECAoQBQ#imgrc=fXe_y7OvdT0FLM:
What a scream, Diane. The post that I made earlier with Rachel’s interview now says, on my screen “Your comment is awaiting moderation.”
It seems the little gremlins are having fun. Last week Dee and I were prevented from emailing each other. Ned’s comments get edited in real time, as Terry Shulze calls it. Ned and Terry are both barristers so they will be targeted, natch. But the gremlins can’t target a thousand barristers, can they?
recently someone said/ i heard that ann bressington adelaide independent ex MP i think? who knew this much – and had spoken up loudly and.. was outspoken – now lives overseas because she and family had death threats. But times they are a changing .. and we are mostly outspoken .. there is a rising consciousness and people are waking up. Hope the whole family returns home and we all continue to tell the truth.
I am truly ashamed of knocking my home state.
Adelaide is beautiful. Just to name 3 worthy tourist attractions: The Barossa Valley with wine tastings (an essential business, I imagine), gorgeous Christies Beach, and Tandanya center of Aboriginal Art (in the CBD).
Oh, and a ride on the Popeye. I had to use it one day for actual transportation and was amazed at the loveliness of the Torrens River. Oh, and Cleland Reserve where you can have conversations with emus. Did I mention The Fringe Festival, every February-March?
If you are a senior citizen (and who isn’t?), you pop into the WH Smith shop on arrival at Adelaide Airport and they give you a 2-week pass for use on the buses and trains. Take the J1 bus straight into Wright St (in back of the Central Market) and stand outside the Youth Court holding a protest sign.
Tell me what your sign will say. [There are language restrictions here at Gumshoe, but I am Madam Supervisor and I will go light this time.]
If there is a big turnout of protestors, will media show up to film it?
Not a snowball’s chance in Hell.
Nuns to the guillotine. Not a joke.
@Nemesis.I wish the various naive Trump admirers here would view and read theYoutube videos and writings of investigative US journalists Whitney Webb and Wayne Madsen showing his decades-old predilection for pedophile sex with underage girls.
They will see from Webb that Trump was a guest of Epstein in the 90s and his ex wife went out with Ghislaine Maxwell to procure said girls.
This does not disprove Pizzagate or other Democrat pedophilia or satanic ritual abuse.
Reminds me of those rightwingers who were so besotted with Thatcher that they did not want to know about the protected doings of her son Mark, also the subject of investigative journalism.
Nope. What makes anyone be sure that Webb is who or what you think?
Not being a Trump admirer would not make Webb reliable. She too may very well belong to the Church of Satan. So many do.
I’ve found Wayne Madsen reliable for many years. By the way, as soon as the sexual-humiliation-torture at Abu Ghraib was announced (around 2008?), Madsen reported that it was being live-streamed into the White House for the entertainment of Pres G Bush, Jr.
Duns Scotus – you don’t believe that the Democrats and lying media would have been all over that ‘problem’ if they could prove it was true?
The Globalist/Deep State have tried everything else -even attempted assassinations – pretty obvious to me that Trump never was, or is, one of their own.
There are other more informative articles concerning Trump the man that you could be looking at?
As a woman I must say that I find the tarts on this clip a good deal more offensive than Epstein & Trump put together
In Rachel’s interview with Attwood, at the 40-minute mark, she says that the phrase “it’s an operational matter” means someone is making allegations against the police. She then says the whole point was to shut down any investigations. She compares it to a contemporary (1980s) thingie in the UK called Operation False Flag.
Dear Readers, please deal with Rachel’s entirely deserving need for an investigation, separately, from the issue I raise about Youth Court (and some of the Family Courts, too — ask Dee). I am trying to get the legal community to brave up to the fact that Youth Court is obviously a scam. It needs to stop hurting protective parents — and the littlies — right now.
I think it does not matter if there is Free Masonry involved. What matters is that “straight” solicitors — say, the graduating classes of Flinders and Adelaide Law — need to apply their normal sense of the law. Some judges, cops, social workers, etc are CRIMINALS.
So waddya gonna do, Boys?
Or, if the boys can’t handle it, waddya gonna do, Girls?
Some of you are on hols, thanks to COVID-19. You could do it. Here is one thing you could do. Write to every faculty member of the 2 schools and ask them to commit their name to answering a simple question: Do they think the Mullighan Report should remain under seal for 80 years — yes or no, and if yes, on what justification, and if no, what do they recommend be done to unseal the unsealable?
You had to have high TER scores to get into law school. Act smart.
Mary – I admire your grit and drive to expose what needs to be exposed.
I’ll give you an example for why the exposure needs to come from above and from those who are willing to push that giant turd up hill, and not from the grass roots level who are kept in check by the gatekeepers, no matter how much evidence and determination they may have in their willingness to see ‘justice’ done.
Michael Smith, from michaelsmithnews, like me, is an ex-copper. His profile after the cops got him all the way into radio. His first experience of that was at 4CH? Brisbane, in the early 2000s then getting a morning slot at 2UE around 2006 in Sydney.
He was first made aware of then prime minister, Julia Gillard’s wrongdoing during the early 1990s some time later, I believe 2008. Anyway, Smith chose to expose Gillard’s criminality via some very compelling evidence as put to him on air.
Some days later he was told by 2UE management to desist in exposing a sitting prime minister, Smith refused and continued his presentations, and was sunsequently sacked. it came out later that Gillard had called the station and threatened legal action, and some say, pulling the stations broadcast license.
Gillard then gave a speech in federal parliament, disparaging Smith’s name – slandering private citizens in parliament is against house rules – but the Speaker when presented later with a letter seeking redress from Smith, refused to act on it. So Gillard got away with that.
Anyone who has followed michaelsmithnews as I have, and the evidence he has exposed on his website concerning the wrongdoing that Gillard committed as a lawyer, can have no doubt that Gillard should never have been considered for election into federal parliament, let alone become a prime minister.
Smith is the proverbial dog at a bone when seeking ‘justice’ and some 14 years after being sacked for exposing Gillard, he is still seeking his ‘justice’, even to the point of attempting to push through at the local court level, a private prosecution for Gillard’s wrongdoing that has gone absolutely nowhere to date.
What Smith has unwittingly exposed in what has now come, his personal vendetta, is just how corrupted the system really is and to what lengths it will go to protect their own.
Food for thought Mary.
Start at around 3 minutes. Mona not allowed to see her grands until they turn 18, but this video has been up since 2008 so age 18 may have arrived.
CPS is a killer. Why are we continuing to let this happen? I first learned of Mona from the Bill Windsor show “Lawless America.” Bill then got imprisoned on false charges.
Salutations, Bill Windsor!
I am receiving Cathy Fox emails almost daily– this one very relevant to my “knowledge”
just a brief up date. Not to distract from important videos- above and Rachel work
What is significant at this time is Cathy always acknowledges Australia through Fiona Barnet testimony as does Shaun Atwood in his interview with Rachel. As Mary says Adelaide has been the central point for the running of the country since colonisation. And as Churchill said using education and religion would be easy –however medicine and law would be more difficult. We need a cadre of psychologists to infiltrate every organisation—–etc etc to take over the world –apologies for inaccuracies —
I am otherwise occupied for the next short while -will post a second comment from Cathy
“Cisco Wheeler and Fritz Springmeier – Illuminati Whistleblowers
by cathy fox blog on Child Abuse
This will be very short, as I just wish to point towards Cisco Wheeler and Fritz Springmeier, and and the wealth of information that they have published. For anyone who does not know, Cisco Wheeler and Fritz Springmeier are also whistleblowers on the illuminati.
Fritz wrote the excellent Bloodlines of The Illuminati [2] and his website is here [5] and there is more information here Whale Fritz Springmeier [6]”
“Note also that Fritz Springmeier only documents 13 bloodlines stemming from Jacob’s twelve sons, both of Jacobs grandsons from his son Joseph (Manasseh and Ephraim get counted).
It is little known that there is a 14th line which comes through Abraham also and the descendants of his son Ishmael. They are Muslim and what are considered true blood ie there is not much genetic inbreeding between them and the other bloodlines. Iran, Iraq, and many of these countries in those areas tie into the line of Ishmael. This can be known as the Muslim Brotherhood bloodline, which may go far to explain some geopolitical manoevres. Antichrist Rising – The When and Where and How… [8]
Cisco Wheeler and Fritz wrote these reveals of the programming techniques…
Fritz Springmeier & Cisco Wheeler The Illuminati Formula Used to Create an Undetectable Total Mind Controlled Slave [3]
Fritz Springmeier & Cisco Wheeler Deeper Insights Into the Illuminati Formula [4]
For more on the structure of the illuminati check here The Five Child trafficking Networks of the Illuminati [9]”
Diane, it must have been someone else that claimed Adelaide as a center. I have no sense of that.
Regarding Fritz Springmeier, I value his investigations of Illuminati in the 20th century, which seem to be from open sources. Anything from the Middle Ages we can have no way of proving or disproving.
Here’s a sample of down-to-earth stuff from Fritz’s book on Walt Disney re Warren Buffett:
“According to the San Francisco Examiner, Buffett owns 24 million shares of Disney. Warren Buffett is part of the Ak-Sar-Ben fraternity and Monarch slave abusers who were exposed in the Nebraska Savings and Loan scandal. He is too powerful for anyone to touch.”
Second Cathy Quote
“I only post on this blog and links on Twitter at present, if you have found this post useful, please post on other social media – facebook, instagram, pinterest, gab – whichever ones you are on. This is most helpful to spread the information. The people who do this are essential. Thankyou.
These sites may be useful for people wishing to deprogram…
Deprogramwiki [Q]
How to Integrate Alters – Fiona Barnett [P]
SurvivorsJustice Triggers post [E]
I will not commit suicide and if it appears I have, then people may judge for themselves why this is so, after blogging these exposes of the top level of illuminati. I do not wish to live in the kind of world that the psychopathic illuminati want to bring in, which is a world wholly and absolutely controlled by them, which is why I wish to expose them. This carries some risk but if I am killed or go silent, my wish is for more people to tell the truth, they cannot kill us all…”
Another Shaun Atwood gift
The spiders web. —it runs through the strands
@Nemesis and Dot.
the us media are not about to uncover trump in respect of pedophilia for the same reason that they cover for the clintons, that is, if they expose trump they would uncover democrat child predation as well. there is one party in the usa and it is called republicrat.
the 1 percent of the 1 percent play together and fight together.
it is noticeable how you both reject whitney webb and wayne madsen out of hand, because they threaten your partisan beliefs. it seems you are no different to those who scream at us that we are disrespectful of the dead when we say that martin bryant did not do port arthur.
or the gillard admirers and hence tony abbott haters, such as media watch on the abc, who continually cover for alp and green malfeasance.
or the tony abbott and john howard lovers at e.g, quadrant magazine who regally ignore how abbot tried to get the adf into ukraine confronting russia and hence trigger a war, as described by john helmer, australian doyen of russia correspondents.
it is called cognitive dissonance
nemesis, your admiration of michael smith does not surprise. his hatred of gillard and wish to bring her down, quite justified from a leftist standpoint too, goes hand in hand with his naive adulation of trump, adulation of the australian military at all times and in all places and worship of the police. and of course his hatred of trades union. in my view this underlies his admirable work in uncovering trade union corruption and sleaze.
presumably smith and his ilk long for the days when the lower classes really knew their place.
like smith, you are ex-police.
rachel has just shown again in her recent interview with shawn attwood that police forces across this country are de facto failing to discharge their duty, as we see from her statement that she gets told the strange phrase, its an operational matter, when she tries to name pedophile and satanic ritual abuse names and dates and places and get investigations opened.
Duns Scotus – If Trump was involved, as you imply, with the Satanic World Order then he would not have written the Executive Order of December, 21, 2017, that targets Human Trafficking – specifically aimed at women and children. Maybe you should read it online as to what exactly it entails?
And if you were following alternative media sites that rely on sources other than the Mockingbird Media, you would be up to date with just how many pedophiles and human traffickers have been put away to date that the media you believe covers for Trump refuses to report on.
There comes a time when the Truth of something becomes irrefutable on the knowledge gained to the beholder, and that no amount of ‘fake news’ will ever be able to discount. Hence my rejection of the article you would have me read.
As to your inference to police at the lower levels in those organizations being in some way able to achieve the same kind of exposure that the once up a time good journalist was able to expose, if you had any real understanding of how the inquisitive officer is treated by a hierarchy not interested in what he/she wishes to uncover, then you would not have raised your point.
I’ve been there!
nemesis, unlike you i am willing to read opposition references, so get yours straight, your executive order is from jan 2020 not late 2017
https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-combating-human-trafficking-online-child-exploitation-united-states/
now unlike you i have read it, it is aimed mainly at 13 russians.
AND were you born yesterday, since when do such fine documents apply to the rich and powerful? and to israel intelligence honeypot operations such as the ghislaine maxweLl-wexner-epstein one?
and ever heard the saying, dont watch what i say, watch what i do? this applies to trump as it does to anybody.
hence, not to mention.
“There is little doubt that Donald Trump knows Jeffrey Epstein, as Trump acknowledged in a 2002 New York magazine profile of Epstein:
Epstein likes to tell people that he’s a loner, a man who’s never touched alcohol or drugs, and one whose nightlife is far from energetic. And yet if you talk to Donald Trump, a different Epstein emerges. “I’ve known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy,” Trump booms from a speakerphone. “He’s a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it — Jeffrey enjoys his social life.”
personally i am glad that trump is president rather then killary, but only because we are still alive in spite of the deep states drive for war with russia.
but his service to the .01 percent incl. oligarchs in the usa is evident, he never enacted any of the fine leftist words he uttered when on campaign in 2016.
nemesis, i retract my allegation that the text of jan. 2020 of which i have given the url is aimed at 13 russians mainly, that was a previous trump edict.
however, your 2020 text, while full of fine words about child trafficking, online porn and runaway children does not involve cia, fbi or any police agency in its prescriptions.
the us attorney general and justice dept. are mentioned but i notice the phrase “subject to applicable law” which may imply that these matters do not need any new legislation.
but as i said, moral texts are one thing, enacting them is another.
in the usa as in the uk or in adelaide, complainants have to find police who are willing to investigate the complaint at all.
and you are teling me that because trump signs such a text, he is not involved in and knows nothing about pedophilia or sra?
Duns Scotus – your paragraph on Trump and Epstein only proves that Trump knew him. Did you also realize that Melania was introduced to Trump by Epstein? So what does any of that prove?
There can be no guilt by association, unless it’s an intimate one, and then intent for the intimacy has to be proven.
You have not proven your point!
Trump had many business dealings with Epstein – even attended some parties with him, but, what ended their relationship was when Epstein was at Mar al Lago some years back and while there, attempted to entice, some say molest, a young teenage girl.
Trump kicked him out!
Some media outlets have attempted in implicate Trump with Epstein’s Island by association, but there are no records of Trump attending that terrible place.
And Epstein kept meticulous records because he was a meticulous blackmailer.
Operations to close down Globalist/Deep State human trafficking involves military personnel. and does not use civilian agencies for a very good reason, but you would already know that if you were following ‘Q’.
The Globalist/Deep State has far more resources with which to dig up dirt on those who refuse to tow their line, don’t you believe that if there was anything at all they could substantively prove against Trump it would be aired in public already?
But, folks like you will just keep on attempting to malign Trump in any way they think they can.
At some point in your own life you will be faced with the Truth of something, I just hope you recognize it as such when it happens.
@diane de vere,
as also with the anticatholic protestantism of fiona barnett as documented in her recent book, the problem with taking the bible with its ishmael and abraham stories as scientific truth is that there is no evidence.
read for this THE BIBLE UNEARTHED by finkelstein anhd silbermann,. both archaeologists.
it is quite possible that people believe in such biblical bloodlines, however, and act as if they existed.
after all, there are people who act as if covid 19 had the lethality rate of ebola and not that of the flu.
Anyone needing to check on the American version of the ICL — the GAL — please see this report by Keith Harmon:
https://gumshoenews.com/2019/08/28/family-courts-in-us-gals-doctors-custody-consultants-one-hand-washes-the-other/
DO NOT MISS THIS ESSAY BY DEE MCLACHLAN AND ITS SUPERB COMMENTS
https://gumshoenews.com/2018/10/30/who-is-trying-to-help-children-and-who-is-conspiring-to-defeat-justice/
… and don’t miss this link to the Gumshoe youtube channel article featuring Dr Russell Pridgeon
today’s cathyfox email–very relevant to Adelaide –and Australia-and the source/origin of networks–UK
https://cathyfox.wordpress.com/2020/04/28/dr-raymond-colin-birt/
Dr Raymond Colin Birt
Posted on 2020, April, 28by cathy fox blog on Child Abuse
In 1986 Geoffrey Dickens, MP for Huddersfield exposed Dr Raymond Colin Birt as a possible paedophile in the House of Commons [5].
“According to Hansard
Mr. Dickens asked the Attorney-General if he will now prosecute Dr. Raymond Colin Birt in respect of sexual offences involving an eight-year-old girl in Chelmsford.
However the Attorney General was none other than notorious gatekeeper for paedophiles Michael Havers [8] who also failed to prosecute Peter Hayman, Geoffrey Prime or anyone for Elm Guest House. So with hindsight it was no surprise that Michael Havers refused to prosecute.[5]”
I repeat my earlier comment– with a couple of extra points.
What is significant at this time is Cathy always acknowledges Australia through Fiona Barnet testimony as does Shaun Atwood in his interview with Rachel. Apologies Mary–will change this to “my research” tells me– Adelaide has been the central point for the running of the country since colonisation. And as Churchill said using education and religion would be easy –however medicine and law would be more difficult. We need a cadre of psychologists to infiltrate every organisation—– and I omitted The Big Pharma etc etc to take over the world.
Quid pro quo, Diane, here is some data on Havers, hot off the press from Wikipedia. Born 1923, educated at the Westminster School. Dad and Sis were judges. Took silk at age 41. Was appointed Solicitor General by Edward Heath. (I’m not saying anything, not a word.) Became AG from 1979 to 1987 under Thatcher (still not saying anything.) Participated in the wrongful conviction of the Guildford Four and the Maguire Family.
I feel sorry for these people. Do they have any joy at all?
I urge everyone (particularly Mary Maxwell, LLB) who is dismayed, righteously indignant, or enraged at the very evident corruption in the unlawful corporate “government”, “judiciary”, “public service” etc. etc. to pay careful attention to the contents of this video:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/b19qRPmKWZCa/
It offers a real opportunity for an effective “class action” against the corporate criminals who have taken over just about every State and institution in the World. More can be found at:
https://www.commonlawcourt.com/
I tried, in my own pedestrian, plebeian way, to initiate a movement in this direction but I got no interest, anywhere. Perhaps a ball that is already rolling can excite a bit more interest. As I claim, it is impossible that “the system” will fix itself from within… it’s too big with too many resources and lackeys. You can complain to them all you like but I think they only get an ego “fix” at the sight of people suffering under the jackboots of their esoteric ideology.
So PLEASE tell me if you have received ANY contact from a judge , lawyer or policeman since publication of this article ?