Home Corona The Lone Star State Finds Real Value of Sheriffhood

The Lone Star State Finds Real Value of Sheriffhood

66
President George Washington, formerly General Washington, gave the opening prayer at the meeting of CSPOA – Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association, on February 26, 2021 in Houston

by Mary W Maxwell, LLB

Sheriff Mack is everything he is cracked up to be, and more. When he was a sheriff in Arizona, he didn’t like what was going on, re the feds’ overreach. He figured that the oath he had taken to defend the US Constitution was serious business and that if any official asked him to do something unconstitutional, well, the oath had precedence over that.

The meeting I attended today in Houston was about as mask-less as you can get. This is because when the state governor of Texas ordered everyone to wear a mask the sheriff of Montgomery County (which includes Houston) said “Ahem, ahem, cough, cough.” As in “Not in my county.  My peace officers will not enforce it.”

Look how easy it is to get the bullies to back down when you call their bluff. Here is an example of that, as told today by Brad Rogers former sheriff of Elkhart County, Indiana, which has a large population of very peaceful Amish people.

The FDA (or maybe the Commerce Dept) was hassling an Amish farmer for selling raw milk, including over state lines. He was being called to a grand jury, which could lead to a criminal indictment.  Smart fellow — he knew enough to seek help from the sheriff.  The sheriff, Brad Rogers, told the feds to naff off.  They naffed off.

There was a lot of trouble in between, including a threat to arrest Rogers, but Rogers (having been inspired by Mack) simply let them know he was not going to cave. Interestingly, I think the feds would have won. The Commerce Clause of the US Constitution does give Congress a right to regulate interstate trade.

I cried my way through several of the talks, as it sounded like stuff I have been preaching for years — but I never get an “A-men” from an audience.  It was Amen city here today.  And there were laughs galore.  The best knee-slapper was about Fauci.

Sheriff Richard Mack said Fauci had come out with a new “scientific” idea about Covid. Fauci (allegedly) proclaimed that germs in the air always rise to more than 40 inches off the ground.  Therefore, to escape the chance of inhaling Covid, you should get down on the ground. Instead of walking, you need to crawl.

Would the folks obey? asked Mack. Sure, and a whole new industry would develop to provide kneepads and hand-pads. When you get out of your car at Walmart’s, you should get right down onto the ground in the parking lot, rather than breathe the air at forty inches or higher.

Gives whole new scope to the concept of “virtue signaling” doesn’t it?

Another speaker, Attorney Michael Peroutka of Maryland, taught us that the authors of the Declaration of Independence, busy complaining about edicts from King George III, such as the Stamp Act, used the phrase “pretended legislation” when referring to laws that did not pass (the colonists’) muster.

Sheriffs in the audience (less than half of the 200 people in the conference room) were delighted when Peroutka pointed out that if it’s a pretend law, then the offender can only be considered a pretend offender. By the way, even the laypersons in the room were pretty well holstered.

There was a whopping talk by Laura Pressley.  She had been an engineer for 17 years before she decided, in 2018, to run for public office in Dallas. She made it to the runoff but then lost to the other guy, who had no power base. Naturally, she felt sure she was cheated.

Dr Pressley compared her runoff to other runoffs and saw that her numbers were very weird.  She went to check on such things as the required audit log and found that all was being conducted illegally.  Since Gumshoers don’t live in Texas, I won’t weigh you down with detail, but the following is worth telling, as it is right out of Paul Mullen’s playbook.

Laura filed a lawsuit to reclaim her stolen election. Having researched the election facts to the nth degree, she handed in all the evidence. The District Court judge dismissed her case as frivolous.  But more than that, he sanctioned her $100,000.  She went to the 3rd court of appeals. That judge, too, dismissed her case and added another $45,000.

And you think you’ve got troubles.

Here’s a new phrase I picked up today: “Every official from dog catcher right down to president of the United States.”

I also picked up the phrase “we work for God, family, and country.” As I found in Alabama in 2017, Southerners speak of Jesus as if He were a next-door neighbor. Sheriff Mack is Mormon. He is being sued by atheist group at the moment.

I picked up the fact that the feds officially own 90% of the state of Nevada.

And that sheriffs do NOT want legislation that restricts asset forfeiture.  They say the big cartel uses trucks worth $300,000.

The only female sheriff who spoke was a tiny-built girl, Pam Elliot.  She mainly told dirty jokes.  Example: “I’m so nervous when I get up here on stage. My Mom told me to look at the audience and imagine everyone is naked.” Then she points to a sheriff and says “You, sir, stay after.”

One of Pam’s sayings is “public servants are just that.”

She is my hero, as she has arrested four officials for public corruption.  I asked her if she could do the needful if I name some names.  She reminded me that her jurisdiction is, alas, limited.

One other female on the official team is Dawn, the wife of Sheriff Mack. He credits her for thinking up the whole gig about the sheriff having greater power than other parts of government. I did not quite understand this at first but now I get it — if the feds or state officials order anything unconstitutional to be done, the sheriffs can veto it by not enforcing bad law or bad un-law or pretend law.

A judge, yes a judge, gave a fiery speech.  (I think his surname is also Mack). He kept saying “Freedom is not free.   Freedom is not free.”   Too right, Mate.

The final act of the conference was Sam Bushman who read us the Red Neck Bill of Rights.  It consists only of this: “Don’t hurt me and don’t take my stuff.” Sam runs a national talk-back radio show.

Sheriff Mack is a powerhouse, believe me. Insha’allah I will say more about him later.

 

SHARE

66 COMMENTS

  1. MM, So glad you were there.

    Maybe I should be moving to Texas. You caught some great catch phrases

    “Freedom is not free. Freedom is not free.”
    “Every official from dog catcher right down to president of the United States.”

    Where are the powerhouse officials in Oz?

    • Oh-oh, Your Bossness, you missed the point. It’s not powerhouse OFFICIALS we need. It could be — and it is — you.

      Admittedly, Mack is in a unique position as sheriff. HE can talk to cops in a way others can’t.

      The meeting was really en-couraging.

  2. As I understand it, and I seek confirmation from Mary on this, following the Civil War, when all states joined the Union, Texas chose to do so as an interim measure. In other words, the move was never ratified by State legislature and therefore Texas is a State of the United States of America “until/unless we change our minds”.

    I am intuiting that many Texans are currently thinking that if they want to exercise freedoms, they might be well-advised to go it alone. ie become the nation state of Texas.

    Which also means that Texas could be the first of a very long row of dominos to kick the NWO in the guts.

    So too, could Australia, if only we could get rid of Murdoch and his zionist mates.

    • Tony, I’m not good at the history of any except the New England states (S’truth, sorry).

      No, it’s not correct that all states were added in 1861. I can remember when I was a kid hearing a song constantly on the radio “Alaska, Alaska, we salute you as the 49th state.” And I can’t have heard radio in 1861. Can I?

      As for Texas having the prerogative of “departing,” we all 50 of us can depart. I hold that the reason the rebels were pardoned, en masse, by Pres Johnson in 1858 was to avoid a court test of whether secession had been a sin.

      Funny you mention it, though. At the opening of the meeting on Friday, we couldn’t find a flag to pledge allegiance to. (I do not approve of pledging to a flag, but never mind that). So someone carried up to the stage a big curtain that had stars and stripes on it and the Emcee wittily remarked “Watch out, one of those stars might fall off.”

      So, Tony, why don’t you start a secessionist movement for the Northern Territory. I think you personally could make a good case (or Mal for WA).

          • Who’s the debtor, the government or the people?
            The latter can hardly be legally bound by a transaction that took place without their knowledge or consent

          • No one can be legally bound by something to which they’ve not specifically put their name
            The situation just exemplifies the fact that Aus. governance is 100% rogue.

          • Paul the apostle to the Romans – Romans 13:1-2

            A translation of my Greek interlinear provided this –

            “Every soul to authorities higher be subject to. For there is no authority if not from god, but the existing authorities under Me having been ordained are. So the one resisting the authority of his God has opposed and those having opposed to themselves judgement will receive.”

            Luke 11:28 – But he said, Yea rather, blessed [are] they that hear the word of God, and keep it. Acts 5:29 – Then Peter and the [other] apostles answered and said, We ought to obey God rather than men.

            “…….Romans 13 is in play until the government, ruling class, authority over you, whatever you want to call it, decides that it is the final arbiter and sets itself up in the position reserved for God alone. When the state or the government moves to exclude God and to erect itself in that position, a Christian has an obligation before God to expose and resist evil.

            Eph 5.11 have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove them. even if it means that resistance has consequences from those who assume power that you are resisting…………”

          • no need to resist an entity that’s intrinsically powerless
            in fact doing so just imputes undue credit
            the idea is to simply lay low, and as demonstrated by Frodo below, that’s never going to be comfortable

        • As I recall, the matter was taken to the UK (as Australia was clearly still a colony then) and the relevant UK authority formed a committee to deal with the matter.
          In classic “Yes Minister” strategy, the committee did nothing from thereon, and it was not that long ago that the committee formally was disbanded.
          It was just in the year 1983 that the office of Colonial Secretary had a name change:

          It is hereby directed that any reference contained in-
          .

          (a) any law; or

          (b) any instrument, contract, or legal proceedings made or commenced before the coming into operation of this Order,

          to-

          (c) the Chief Secretary; or

          (d) the Colonial Secretary,

          shall be read and construed as a reference to the Minister for Employment and Administrative Services .

          from the Government Gazette, W.A. 3 June 1983

          • I guess the very best anyone can do is to steer clear so as to let them go ahead and kill each other:

          • There are some very interesting comments here that would be worth unravelling.
            Remember when there was a name change from the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia to the Australian Government.

            Essentially the body politic known as the people of the Commonwealth of Australia was put into administration in the 1930’s, with further incremental steps taken up to the present.

            The people voted by referendum to alter the Constitution to facilitate this (Section 105 and 105A).
            Most Supreme Court Acts of the various States changed just after this to facilitate the new basis of law and the change of the status of the people that would occur as they acted in ignorance thereafter.

            The people were enticed to leave the de jure jurisdiction of the Commonwealth to “reside” in the de facto jurisdiction of the administrative jurisdiction.

            As crisscross states – “how can a debtor secede from the bank?”

            The answer of course is by paying all that is due.
            And to do this, one must use the law of trusts and the jurisdiction of equity.

            So when berry asks: “who is the debtor, the government or the people?” the answer is both!

            What if the government is there to serve the people?

            Section 105 declares that the States indemnify the Commonwealth for the debts taken over by the Commonwealth.
            The people are treated as the equitable collateral, and their performance is ‘converted’ (pure equity term, where an equitable asset is changed into a legal form by securitisation) into frn’s, which later become pure fiat currency.
            (Remember privately held gold being claimed by the various western governments at this time – Commonwealth Bank Act No 31 1929)

            The States are holding the equitable assets of the people in the form of their Birth Registration Statements (or equivalent) presented/given/deposited/ by our parents (usually) and so can be made trustee of an equitable trust.

            The equity jurisdiction deals with inheritance, banking, transaction, correcting mistakes caused by ignorance of rights, creating records and more.

            The people have been duped into believing that they are something that the government created, and they wonder why the only rights they seem to have are those granted by government.
            Where are their unalienable rights?

            This is just a taste for those who would like to change the nature of their relationship with the States, Commonwealth and various crowns/Crowns.

          • Some definitions I’ve come across –

            Divine Law Definition:

            the law that defines the Divine in accordance with Astrum Iuris Divini Canonum and clearly demonstrates the spirit, mind, purpose and instruction of the Divine Creator including the operation of the Volition and Will of the Divine Creator through existence. Therefore all valid Law may be said to be derived from Divine Law. The highest law of all Law is therefore Divine Law, then Natural Law, then Cognitive Law, then Positive Law

            Natural law –

            Definition:the law that defines the operation of the Volition and Will of the Divine Creator in accordance with Astrum Iuris Divini Canonum through its existence in the Form of matter and physical rules. Natural Laws define the operation and existence of the physical universe, all valid Positive Law may be said to be derived from Natural Law

            Cognitive law

            Definition:the set of laws that define the special attributes possessed by certain higher orderlife such as mind, ideas, knowledge, recognition and self-awareness created through the simultaneous application of both Divine Law and Natural Law

            Positive law

            Definition:the laws that are enacted by Men and Women through proper authority in accordance with Astrum Iuris Divini Canonum for the government of a society. As Positive Law ultimately refers to physical objects and living beings, all valid Positive Law may be said to be derived from Natural Law

            Natural person –

            Definition: A man or woman in Roman law as a perverse or false attempt to claim that the fiction of Person is part of Natural law

            Personailty

            Definition:At the beginning of the 19th Century, a new definition was added to reflect the real-world fact of unique differences between individuals, namely “A set of qualities that makes a PERSON distinct from another”. The use of the word “personality” in the creation of the fictional and extremely dangerous “science” of psychology is attested from the early 20th Century meaning “assumed role or manner of PERSONAL behaviour”.

            Who or What is a Person ? Court actions and God’s opinion.

            As a young boy at Nudgee Boys Collage, Brisbane, Queensland, I was referred to as ‘Master’, and never really understood why?

            Now I’m fully aware that One is the ‘Master of their vessel’ until the age of 14, (12 in the USA) and then through deceit and ignorance, One becomes the ‘Vassal of their Master’!

            As you all should be aware by now, the legal definition of ‘Person’ is “Corporation”;

          • Loans from Banks cannot be repaid as all money is issued as an interest bearing debt. How is it possible to pay off a debt with a debt? In Banking terms debts cannot be paid, only discharged and I cannot see Banks letting governments off the hook that easily.

            The only alternative for the government and the people of this nation would be to shake off the interest charging parasites altogether. The only problem with that idea though is that we would undoubtedly get bombed into oblivion the same as Libya.

          • I had a quick look for Astrum Iuris Divini Canonum, and it seems (correct me if I am wrong) to be a unilateral declaration by a party/parties that are not deriving their authority from a pre-existing standing ( https://scannedretina.files.wordpress.com/2018/06/extract-canons.pdf ).

            The problem I see is that they do not have standing to declare, as they are still bound (by actions and lack of right actions) to a pre-existing jurisdiction and obligations therein.
            I’ll bet London to a brick that they are still debtors and bondsmen/bondswomen lacking that capacity of being unencumbered.

            The following quote ties in with their thinking:

            John Bouvier, Inst. Am. Law 1882;
            “Law is nothing without equity, and equity is everything, even without law. Those who perceive what is just and what is unjust only through the eyes of the law, never see it as well as those who behold it with the eyes of equity.

            Law may be looked upon, in some manner, as an assistant for those who have a weak perception of right and wrong, in the same way that optical glasses, are useful for those that are short sighted, or those whose visual organs are deficient.

            Equity, in its true and genuine meaning, is the soul and spirit of the law; positive law is construed, and rational law is made by it.” [Equity is the foundation of all law]

            And Equity is known to be a fiction, because it is man’s best attempt to reflect the Law of Creation.

            Given that there is no lawful money with which to fulfil contracts, all social interactions become trusts, and the equity jurisdiction has the exclusive jurisdiction for enforcing private trusts.
            Statutory trusts ( driver’s licence, birth certificate etc ) come under statutory equity which is granted by the State.
            The legal jurisdiction uses equity to enforce performance.

            I suspect the US Civil War was essentially fought because the southern States were breaching a trust ( the constitutional trust which had the purpose of repaying the debt incurred by the original united states of America ).
            [ Constitutor (Black’s 4th) In the civil law. One who, by a simple agreement becomes responsible for the payment of another’s debt. Inst. 4, 6, 9 (see ‘surety’) ]

          • Regarding loans owed to Banks, there is an important consideration most people are ignorant of, which is that the Bank is holding your equitable asset.

            [Equitable Assets Black’s 4th
            Equitable assets are all assets which are chargeable with the payment of debts or legacies in equity, and which do not fall under the description of legal assets. Story 552
            They are so called because they can be reached only by the aid and instrumentality of a court of equity, and because their distribution is governed by a different rule from that which governs the distribution of legal assets. Story 552]

            Hardly anyone claims and uses their equitable asset, but rather they “give” it to the Bank.
            The Bank ‘converts’ that asset by securitising it and then ‘selling’ it on the Securities Exchange for legal tender.
            That legal tender then becomes the substance of the loan.

            [ Prof. Werner brilliantly explains how the banking system and financial sector really work.
            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EC0G7pY4wRE ]

            Read the Cestui Que Vie Act 1666 to see who is the real owner of that signed loan agreement.

            Also a court case that reaffirms who the true owner of the loan agreement is: Mitchell vs MERS Case no BK-S-07-16226-LBR District of Nevada.

          • As a promissory note is by definition money, then a borrower in fact finances their own loan and pays interest on the money they gave to the Bank.

          • A promissory note in the legal jurisdiction, may be by definition money, but there is no money in general circulation for a promissory note to be honoured.
            Legal tender is already a promissory note, but until lawful money comes back into general circulation, legal tender already represents a novated debt.

            So a promissory note becomes trust res, and by its nature, bearing the signature of a living man/woman, it is equitable.
            The only thing lacking is the law of the equitable trust yet to be designated by the grantor (owner and maker of the note) along with the parties and the purpose.

  3. “To control all the guns is priority number one. To control the secret police is everything, once you do that you can turn the guns on the people.”

    “The sons of the builders, the makers, are being subverted to the philosophy of the destroyers.”
    – Henry Ford

    “You are not alone. All across America, a quiet rage is building against the assault upon American values.
    More so than ever in the history of America, the concerns and patience of it’s people are being tested, tried and attacked by a group of elitists that are hell-bent on the destruction of this country. Refuse to remain silent.”

    Our government has been infiltrated, together with our financial system, our entertainment industry and all mainstream media.

      • Yes, Justin: government, courts, academia, and media. Also, I think, the two professions that used to stand up for what’s right (when called upon to do so): medical and legal.

  4. ok article but great photo lead. we are all old here so its great to see Mayflower Mary.
    i have heard Sheriff Mac speak, and ‘hell yeah”.
    New England, New Rome, New Hampshire… olde story, drugs of biological retardation go one way and people as payment on the now ‘ledger’ go the counter trade.

    [deleted]
    Mary’s words are always on the honest side of the trade. So I thank you, even if dismayed at you having have lost your bonnet for the photo opportunity.

    • sorry,

      thought the video stop was the Sheriff at that place in those times. Barry Seal, no way, all good but no way this individual , anywho blah blah. Not even “aviator Ray(theon) sunnies.

      No way, really Barry Seal, anywho everything is BS.

      Sorry for my inadvertent misinform.

      Picture worth a thousand words.

      Again sorry, ahhhh

  5. Walked past the local Catholic primary school bus stop, with only one advertisement on side.
    Full gloss colour in glass frame, double life size. A late teens girl in army combat gear, titled, ‘a easy life’!
    Is this sarcasm or confidence? Freedom nowhere.

  6. Is it time to write America’s obituary? Is it time to say, ‘Goodbye, America’?

    “We, the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it.” — Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, October 3, 2001
    .
    Kevin MacDonald’s review of Wilhelm Marr’s pamphlet, Der Sieg des Judenthums über das Germanenthum, 1879, (“The Victory of Judaism over Germanism”), is a fascinating compendium of pessimistic quotations in which German political pundit Marr concludes gloomily that there was no hope left for Germany.

    It was finished — yes, as early as the 1870s. The Jews, he lamented, were simply too formidable a foe. 

    Marr’s pamphlet ends with these chilling words: “Let us accept the inescapable, since we cannot change it. Its name is: FINIS GERMANIAE—the end of Germany!”

    1.  Is America the new Germany?

    I confess I had no idea the outlook was so bleak in Germany as early as 1879. (Marr’s pamphlet has recently been translated into English and is now available in pdf format).  I had been under the false impression that the notion of Jewish domination came much later — after the publication of the Protocols (1903) and the Russian Revolution (1917).

    We have seen it all happen though. Germany was brought to its knees, exactly as Marr predicted. Its cadaver now lies rotting.

    It was only quite recently that Israel demanded from Germany a further 1 billion Euros ($1.4 billion) in Holocaust reparations for its endlessly traumatized Jewish survivors. Almost 70 years after World War II, the grim extortion racket continues unabated.

    Though World War II ended sixty-eight years ago, the number of Holocaust survivors today is truly phenomenal. This prompted Norman Finkelstein’s mother to ask somewhat cynically, after she had been cheated out of her reparations money by the rabbis who administered the Holocaust Fund: “If everyone who claims to be a survivor actually is one, who did Hitler kill?”

    Good question……………….”

    https://www.darkmoon.me/2013/under-jewish-rule-by-lasha-darkmoon/

    • Latest news re competition between US and Germany:

      Elias Davidsson (near Frankfurt) told me the other day that he saw a train conductor admonishing a rider for taking too long to eat a sandwich (as it means less mask time).

      Yesterday, on a flight from Orlando to Boston, the maitre d of Spirit Air tells us: “You must put your mask back on between sips and bites.”

      He then said — and I know you won’t believe me (but Simon, earlier in this comments section, said Mary is honest):

      “As an example, imagine you have a bag of M&Ms candy.You eat one M&M, then you put your mask back on. Then you eat another M&M, and so forth.”

      OK. Who’s ahead in the collapse of society stakes? Germany or the US?

    • Quoted from a link posted by Diane DeVere:

      “Project your country into a position similar to Hungary’s!

      “Purely for argument’s sake, let’s assume that your country allows in migrant shepherds, itinerant laborers, but mainly refugees, of some ethnic group who subsequently settle there and enjoy the hospitality accorded them; they become citizens, and their descendents stay in your country for centuries without being forced to speak its language. Suppose further that one day your country is disastrously defeated, and the descendents of the shepherds, itinerant laborers and masses of refugees, who have found a new home in your country, suddenly ally themselves with their ethnic brothers on the side of your enemies, and with the help of your enemies their ethnic brothers take away one-third of your country (this refers to Rumania alone! Ed.), claiming that it was their forebears, not your forebears who had first created state in your country.

      This is exactly what is happening to the west, in place of Hungary.
      What was done to Germany (and Hungary), is now being done to the west in general.

      • Justin,
        Remember grandmother telling me, under Austro Hungarian rule before WW1, was as if God walked upon the earth. Her ancient but small land of islands, their navy. Peace and prosperity for all sovereign nations within. Centre of Europe had to be dismantled before elsewhere.

  7. “Well, all these authorities are pushing an agenda – it’s the same agenda, to decarbonise, deindustrialise and disempower the Western world. They are part of a concerted plan to redesign capitalism in a new image. That image of course is socialism. And it’s spearheaded by the grand daddy organisation of them all – the World Economic Forum. The WEF is the architect of the Great Reset and the fourth industrial revolution. They coined the ‘build back better’ hashtag, that is actually proving so popular with big government elites right across the globe. And they even predict that by 2030, you’ll own nothing and be happy. They call this ‘servitization’, which is a term and an agenda that looks a lot like servitude to me. The WEF claim that this servitude – I’m sorry, I mean ‘servitization’ will save the planet, and assist the post – COVID -19 recovery………
    Under the WEF vision, the Davos attendees will own what you’ll be renting. And trust me on this, it’s not going to be philanthropic enterprise. They’ll all be looking to make more money than they currently do, and actually to take more control of your life under the guise of equality. By reducing you to a mere user rather than an owner, the world does actually become more equal, because it will concentrate power, authority and money in the hands of a tiny few, while the rest of us become mere economic vassals for these oligarchs.
    So make no mistake – servitization is just a new name for economic slavery. It’s socialism on a global scale.”

    Cory Bernardi

    • Lefties I know hate Cory Bernardi even though he is one of the few more honest ones, this must be because the lefties want permanent dole because they are allergic to work.
      It’s heartening that we have a growing core of independents the latest of course being the truthful Craig Kelly. I hope ALP is forced into coalition with Greens and independents form a huge wedge into both sides.

  8. “The new world order, the biggest and most dangerous terrorist group in the world, want to kill 7.3 billion people. They have stated their intentions, very clearly, carved in stone, in 12 different languages.”

    Just a stones throw from my place of birth, house stolen by communists, archeologists found private land title deeds carved in limestone, from the 4th century BC.
    Resist with all hearts minds and souls.

  9. Dee, later this week please publish my RICO suit, Maxwell v FBI et al. I see that Simon is calling me “Mayflower Mary.” Maybe he knows something. Here is the end of my pleadings:

    “12. Declaratory relief under RICO could issue, say, from a judgment that The Boston Globe wrote up the Marathon bombing and its sequelae according to the enterprise’s agenda, both to establish a myth about Islamic terrorism coming to Boston, and to persuade Americans that they no longer live in that City Upon a Hill where, as Massachusetts Governor-to-be John Winthrop said, aboard the Arbella, en route hither in 1630:

    “Now the onely way to avoyde this shipwracke and to provide for our posterity is to followe the Counsell of Micah, to doe Justly, to love mercy, to walke humbly with our God, for this end, wee must be knitt together in this worke as one man, wee must entertaine each other in brotherly Affeccion, wee must be willing to abridge our selves of our superfluities, for the supply of others necessities.

    “Soe shall wee keepe the unitie of the spirit in the bond of peace, the Lord will be our God and delight to dwell among us…soe that wee shall see much more of his wisdome power goodnes and truthe then formerly wee have been eacquainted with.

    “Therefore lett us choose life, that wee, and our Seede, may live; by obeyeing his voyce, and cleaveing to him, for hee is our life, and our prosperity.”

    Respectfully submitted, Mary Maxwell, PRO SE, Concord NH

    • I have to say I really enjoyed the correct use , finally, omg, of the language.
      I’m still giggling too.
      See you all on the parapets.

      • Acyrologia

        An incorrect use of words – particularly replacing one word with another word that sounds similar but has a diffident meaning – possibly fuelled by a deep-seeded desire to sound more educated, which results in an attempt to pawn off an incorrect word in place of a correct one. In academia, such flaunting of common social morays is seen as almost sorted and might result in the offender becoming a piranha, in the Monday world, after all is set and done, such a miner era will often leave normal people unphased. This is just as well sense people of that elk are unlikely to tow the line irregardless of any attempt to better educate them. A small percentage, however, suffer from severe acyrologiaphobia, and it is their upmost desire to see English used properly. Exposure may cause them symptoms that may resemble post-dramatic stress disorder and, eventually, descend into whole-scale outrage as they go star-craving mad. Eventually they will succumb to the stings and arrows of such a barrage, and suffer a complete metal breakdown, leaving them curled up in the feeble position.

        https://img.ifunny.co/images/b7023aaa4e3ef752c75ad0c7e036c8cd3d4671acfce4254677b1206de73c4e32_1.jpg

        You might just think I am being a bit mischievious …

  10. Meanwhile –

    China’s Global Times decries the white supremacist Five Eyes surveillance state

    On February 23, 2021, China’s Global Times published an editorial entitled “Five Eyes Today’s Axis of White Supremacy” which condemned the new anti-Chinese attacks by the members of the Intelligence apparatus which has accelerated in recent weeks.

    The editorial began by condemning the Canadian government’s recent decision to unanimously condemn China as a sponsor of genocide during the embarrassing 266-0 vote on February 21, and then said:

    "Canada, the UK and Australia, three members of the Five Eyes alliance, have recently taken action to put pressure on China. They have formed a US-centered, racist, and mafia-styled community, willfully and arrogantly provoking China and trying to consolidate their hegemony as all gangsters do."

    While major mainstream press covering this editorial decried China Times’s accusations as conspiratorial and foolish, it is worth asking if there is merit and truth underlying the condemnation?

    For those who may not be aware, the Five Eyes is the name given to the British GCHQ-controlled surveillance structure that involves the four primary Anglo-Saxon Commonwealth countries (Britain, Canada, Australian and New Zealand) along with the United States.

    https://www.sott.net/article/449425-Chinas-Global-Times-decries-the-white-supremacist-Five-Eyes-surveillance-state

    Putin, crusaders and barbarians

    February 27, 2021 By Pepe Escobar and first posted at Asia Times Moscow is painfully aware that the US/NATO “strategy” of containment of Russia is already reaching fever pitch. Again.

    This past Wednesday, at a very important meeting with the Federal Security Service board, President Putin laid it all out in stark terms: We are up against the so-called policy of containing Russia. This is not about competition, which is a natural thing for international relations. This is about a consistent and quite aggressive policy aimed at disrupting our development, slowing it down, creating problems along the outer perimeter, triggering domestic instability, undermining the values that unite Russian society, and ultimately to weaken Russia and put it under external control, just the way we are witnessing it transpire in some countries in the post-Soviet space………

    Read more of this post

    https://uprootedpalestinians.wordpress.com/2021/03/01/putin-crusaders-and-barbarians/

  11. God knows how x22 is going to drag this out when he says all the time things are happening, the patriots are in total control etc, here in a (superficially at least) biased, lying article from murdocks’ stable, Trump seems to be condemning us to 4 years of this lockdown / quaxxination torment, or is he just teasing us

    https://www.news.com.au/world/north-america/us-politics/donald-trump-cpac-speech-former-president-reasserts-his-dominance-over-the-republican-party/news-story/bddb6f70e824d010e703498fc42e4920

    • Globalists lately seem to delight in initiating their mad programs on April 1 so we have one month to wait to see what horrors may await on the quaxxinations front. I remember they always used to organise their faux-Islamic terror attacks (such as London bombing July 7 2005) on the new moon so you would see the moon-god zoroastrian symbol of Islam if you looked outside at night after watching the news.

      The cops are reported to be looking out for anit-vaxxers trying to destroy stocks of quaxxine but this would be against every personal and political interest of anti-vaxxers. A bit of depopulation should be a good thing, as long as we can still rely on Gumshoe, Brighteon, Bitchute, Cairns News etc. to present actual news and not the propaganda. Maybe channel 7 is trying feebly to rise above the stench of 9 & 10 (recently purchased by CBS?), I wouldn’t know since I have boycotted TV for weeks now but I am of course interested in anyone breaking ranks.

  12. Thank you for the list, w3.

    This item caught my eye: “Whistleblower: 8 of 31 Residents Dead in German Nursing Home After They Were Forcibly Injected with Pfizer Experimental mRNA COVID Shots Against Their Will.”

    As you know, my case against mandatory vax was dismissed in US District Court but I have until March 31 to appeal. I failed to show that I am under any real threat of it. Dee tells me that New South Wales has passed a law allowing shops, airlines, etc to demand vax proof from customers.

  13. For the record, I think there is a geriatric genocide going on. Do you remember the heat wave in France that killed many elderly in the 1990s? I presume that was an experiment with the help of geo-engineering.

    I also presume the recent Texas winter storm and blackout was both experimental and was a punishment either to the governor for the election lawsuit (recall 17 other states joined as amici), or was aimed at Sidney Powell in Dallas. Hey, I know that’s a stretch. How about the hurricane in Galveston of yesteryear being a message to Ron Paul?

    This morning’s Houston Chronicle says the TX atty gen is suing the power grid for overcharging customers during the blackout.

    • The only weather news I’m really curious about is did we experience global cooling in the last year as the plants & algae should have soaked up all the reduced emissions by now and presumably starving for a return to normal levels

  14. I forgot to mention that Texas’ Deputy AG spoke at the CSPOA meeting. He is young and serious and “with it.”

    In South Australia, the AG, currently Vickie Chapman, is appointed by the party in power in Parliament. In some US states — maybe all? — it is an elected job. So please run out and get elected to it, oh Seppo’s dear.

    Ah, what about the federal AG? It is appointed by the president with the confirmation of 2/3 of the Senate. One can hope Merrick Garland gets eliminated.

    Janet Reno, Alberto Gonzalez, Loretta Lynch, Wm Barr (in 1989 and again in 2019). Such names…. (To whom did they answer?)

    Note: the AG job is not in the Constitution. So, how about new legislation to create an ability for the 50 state AG’s to pick their Best Man for US Attorney General? They would then have to advise the president to nominate that person, per Article II, section 2. Yay!

  15. IT’S CORRECTION TIME. I said in my reply to Tony Ryan that Pres Johnson issued a pardon in 1858. Of course I meant 1868. Per loc.gov:

    “In a final proclamation on December 25, 1868, Johnson declared ‘unconditionally, and without reservation, … a full pardon and amnesty for the offence of treason against the United States, or of adhering to their enemies during the late civil war’…”

    Also, I misspelled the name of the speaker from Maryland who told us about pretend legislation (love that word). It’s Michael Peroutka.

    The person who is being sued by the atheists is Judge Wayne Mack, not the sheriff. I am not sure if it’s a First Amendment type thing or what. By the way, I should have mentioned that Judge Mack is also the coroner. I must give him a copy of my book “Inquest.” Think what a good coroner could do re Port Arthur or the Siege.

    What are we waiting for?

    The website of the group (they are planning more such meetings) is Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officer Association — http://www.cspoa.org The syndicated talk show host who read the Redneck’s Bill of Rights, Sam Bushman, is the Vice President of Operations of CSPOA. He can be contacted at libertyroundtable@gmail.com

    If some newbies are reading this, on the east side of the big pond, and would like to be “journo interns” at GumshoeNews, please write to McLachlanDee@gmail.com.

    Or contact me thru my website http://www.ConstitutionAndTruth.com

  16. Since we’re on the topic of ‘Sheriffhood’ and the need for people in responsible positions who are willing to prosecute criminals, comes this article authored by Dr Ron Paul titled ‘Biden’s Syria Attack: An Actual Impeachable Offense’ :

    http://ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/featured-articles/2021/march/01/biden-s-syria-attack-an-actual-impeachable-offense/

    Yes, Joe Biden should be impeached for bombing Syria in recent days.

    But, if we’re to be consistent, SO TOO should Trump have been impeached for his bombing of Syria in 2018 and his ordering of the murder of General Soleimani (not to mention his contribution towards escalating the Yemeni humanitarian crisis).

    Yet, many Gumshoe readers invariably give Trump a pass, no matter how egregious the crime he’s committed.

    That’s just hypocrisy and you all need to wake up to the fact that Trump is no better than Biden and is accountable to the same controllers.

C'mon Leave a Reply, Debate and Add to the Discussion

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.