Definition of terrorism: The use of violence and threats to intimidate or coerce, especially for political purposes. And the definition of terror: violence or threats of violence used for intimidation or coercion.
ISIS is using these be-headings for their brutal agenda, but the mainstream media (MSM) are in a strange way – doing their bidding.
Why – why would Murdoch’s paper, The Herald Sun, have a full spread front page (above) of Steven Sotloff and the London ‘killer’, PLUS an inside double spread (below) of much the same image? (He seemed to be flashing a real knife this time). Taking nothing away from the grief and pain of the Foley and Sotloff families – or the significance of this news event – but why not a smaller picture and a more sober commentary of what happened. But NO. They are publicizing the violence; propagating the threats; and using the ISIS violence and threats of violence for the intimidation or coercion on the Australian Public. Why is the publicity around this so blatantly provocative and inflammatory? We are being terrorized? And for what purpose? Is the agenda – just selling more papers?
With very brief analysis – I pointed out in a previous post that the ‘Foley Tape’ had fraudulent aspects. This should have been reported: A plastic looking knife and what appears to be a CPR dummy – as Foley’s real arm did absolutely NOT look like the arm on the ‘body’. There are plenty of YouTube clips pointing out other discrepancies.
So why is the MSM intimidating us – and possibly preparing us for something?
Lets look back:
Arms for the Syrian anti-al-Assad fight came from the US’s assistance in Libya. The West was supporting Al Qaeda factions in Syria. There are meetings that are never mentioned (below). This is reportedly a picture of McCain meeting with the man said to be Ibrahim al-Badri (the so-called Caliph of the Islamic State) in May 2013. This leads to the birth of IS and the ‘drive’ back into Iraq (after western training in Turkey and Jordan)
They arrive in a fleet of brand new 4 wheel drives – right out of the shop.
They are skilfully branded.
Faces are mostly covered to show they’re terrorists at photo opportunities (except Wahiyib – see disturbing video). Why? Aren’t they the new State. Have they been told to act like terrorists? Hired guns? (One does see ISIS supporters who think they are on a religious mission and usually they happily reveal their faces.
ISIS (as we have seen) have a veracious appetite for random destruction and selective plunder.
And they have the GREEN LIGHT to enact untold brutality (This picture below is mild compared to the be-headings, planned slaughter, random shootings etc). Crowds gather for punishments. Enlivened groups callously eliminate the ‘enemy’ and forego any hope of personal redemption.
So what is ISIS’s end game? A flag on the White House? To create a State? Or is the mission just to cause demonic MAYHEM?
There are many reports saying ISIS is controlled by the CIA. According to a document recently released by NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the leader of ISIS, now the Islamic State, is an intelligence asset. And Mayhem was planned in the Pentagon back in 2001.
And then there are reports out there that say Rupert Murdoch is a CIA ‘propagandist‘. Murdoch reported to be 13th most powerful person in the world, began to construct his media empire in Australia upon the media assets left to him by his father. During 1960s, with help from the CIA (Central Intelligence Agency), he extended his media holdings to Europe, Asia, and the Americas.
It couldn’t be that an alleged CIA backed organisation is being promoted by an alleged CIA supported press?
Well – back to James Foley.
I find it strange – as this seems so different to the rest of ISIS’s modus operandi.
Alone in the desert with one Londoner (and a message for Obama).
The Londoner has a plastic knife?
And a CPR dummy.
Just a two camera crew, sound guy and a props specialist standing by?
Where is Team ISIS?
Now the same lot do Take 2 with Steven Sotloff – but the video is not ‘available’.
Why do ISIS hold back on their terrible blood-lust and gloating now? (unlike their other barbarous videos). The background, the branding is all insular – to an organisation that is brutally extrovert. And there are fake props. Is this just an outpost, or a side mission of ISIS? Or orchestrated by an outside agent or arm of ISIS?
But yet the Foley/Sotloff videos and imagery was/is PLASTERED all over the western media. What – to scare the hell out of us. Was this just to go back to more war?
The MSM could easily mention the fakery (which some did after about a week). But we are in the meantime being (brain) washed with these images by the MSM. And I’m trying to work out for what political purpose?
WHAT THE HELL IS GOING ON?