Home News The Insanity of Cutting Earth’s Jugular

The Insanity of Cutting Earth’s Jugular

44
The Jugular of the Earth — known as the Strait of Hormuz

Intro by Dee McLachlan

I was appalled when the West went to war in Iraq. It was all a grotesque failure dressed up as strategy. Everything about it was fake… except the million or so who died. And that was the beginning. The opening act, and this wasn’t about stability — it was about dismantling ‘neighbours’, one by one.

Fast forward, and nothing has changed and we are now on country number “seven” — Iran — and it seems the author of the Pentagon message read to General Wesley Clark must have been written by Bibi himself. It seems the Israeli prime minister has sucked the life and money out of the West and flooded its countries with ‘refugees’.

After ‘they’ killed Charlie Kirk, the US President’s ear wasn’t just shot off — it was chewed off by Bibi and the usual band of unhinged neocons. ‘Delusion’ doesn’t even begin to cover it. These are the kind of people — barracking for another country while depleting their own — the Founding Fathers wouldn’t have debated… they’d have been reaching for rope.

Now we arrive at Iran. The long-planned war. The inevitable showdown. Except this time, it’s not going to script (or is it?). It’s escalating — and it’s brushing up against the unthinkable: Bibi (if he’s alive) blasting off nukes.

The war has resulted in cutting the earth’s jugular – the Strait of Hormuz. Maybe this was always part of the plan — at least one of the default options. Cut earth’s jugular… and let humanity bleed out just enough to initiate the GREAT RESET — through energy lockdowns. Digital IDs. Food shortages. Movement controls. And all this rolled out not as power grabs — but as “solutions” to (planned) stupidity.

And whatever happened to those Georgia Guidestones?

So no — this doesn’t feel like chaos. It feels like choreography.

MESSAGES FROM SOME PEOPLE

A Message from a US Israeli-first media personality: Benny Johnson

 I replied:
@MclachlanD1818   Replying to @bennyjohnson

You are a warmongering whore, Benny. Shame on you. Would Christ agree to this murder and mayhem.

Iran’s president — Masoud Pezeshkian — sends message to people of the United States

In the name of God, the Compassionate, the Merciful

To the people of the United States of America, and to all those who, amid a flood of distortions and manufactured narratives, continue to seek the truth and aspire to a better life:

Even after enduring occupation, invasion, and sustained pressure from global powers–and despite possessing military superiority over many of its neighbours – Iran has never initiated a war. Yet it has resolutely and bravely repelled those who have attacked it.

The Iranian people harbour no enmity towards other nations, including the people of America, Europe, or neighboring countries. Even in the face of repeated foreign interventions and pressures throughout their proud history, Iranians have consistently drawn a clear distinction between governments and the peoples they govern. This is a deeply rooted principle in Iranian culture and collective consciousness–not a temporary political stance.

Within this same framework, the United States has concentrated the largest number of its forces, bases, and military capabilities around Iran – a country that, at least since the founding of the United States, has never initiated a war.

Recent American aggressions launched from these very bases have demonstrated how threatening such a military presence truly is. Naturally, no country confronted with such conditions would forgo strengthening its defensive capabilities. What Iran has done – and continues to do – is a measured response grounded in legitimate self-defence, and by no means an initiation of war or aggression.

Relations between Iran and the United States were not originally hostile, and early interactions between the Iranian and American people were not marred with hostility or tension. The turning point, however, was the 1953 coup d’etat – an illegal American intervention aimed at preventing the nationalisation of Iran’s own resources. That coup disrupted Iran’s democratic process, reinstated dictatorship, and sowed deep distrust among Iranians towards US policies. This distrust deepened further with America’s support for the Shah’s regime, its backing of Saddam Hussein during the imposed war of the 1980s, the imposition of the longest and most comprehensive sanctions in modern history, and ultimately, unprovoked military aggression – twice, in the midst of negotiations – against Iran.

Yet all these pressures have failed to weaken Iran. On the contrary, the country has grown stronger in many areas: literacy rates have tripled – from roughly 30 per cent before the Islamic Revolution to over 90 per cent today; higher education has expanded dramatically; significant advances have been achieved in modern technology; healthcare services have improved; and infrastructure has developed at a pace and scale incomparable to the past. These are measurable, observable realities that stand independent of fabricated narratives.

At the same time, the destructive and inhumane impact of sanctions, war, and aggression on the lives of the resilient Iranian people must not be underestimated. The continuation of military aggression and recent bombings profoundly affect people’s lives, attitudes, and perspectives. This reflects a fundamental human truth: when war inflicts irreparable harm on lives, homes, cities, and futures, people will not remain indifferent toward those responsible.

This raises a fundamental question: Exactly which of the American people’s interests are truly being served by this war? Was there any objective threat from Iran to justify such behaviour? Does the massacre of innocent children, the destruction of cancer-treatment pharmaceutical facilities, or boasting about bombing a country “back to the stone ages” serve any purpose other than further damaging the United States’ global standing?

Iran pursued negotiations, reached an agreement, and fulfilled all its commitments. The decision to withdraw from that agreement, escalate toward confrontation, and launch two acts of aggression in the midst of negotiations were destructive choices made by the US government – choices that served the delusions of a foreign aggressor.

Attacking Iran’s vital infrastructure – including energy and industrial facilities – directly targets the Iranian people. Beyond constituting a war crime, such actions carry consequences that extend far beyond Iran’s borders. They generate instability, increase human and economic costs, and perpetuate cycles of tension, planting seeds of resentment that will endure for years. This is not a demonstration of strength; it is a sign of strategic bewilderment and an inability to achieve a sustainable solution.

Is it not also the case that America has entered this aggression as a proxy for Israel, influenced and manipulated by that regime? Is it not true that Israel, by manufacturing an Iranian threat, seeks to divert global attention away from its crimes toward the Palestinians? Is it not evident that Israel now aims to fight Iran to the last American soldier and the last American taxpayer dollar–shifting the burden of its delusions onto Iran, the region, and the United States itself in pursuit of illegitimate interests?

Is “America First” truly among the priorities of the US government today?

I invite you to look beyond the machinery of misinformation – an integral part of this aggression – and instead speak with those who have visited Iran. Observe the many accomplished Iranian immigrants – educated in Iran – who now teach and conduct research at the world’s most prestigious universities, or contribute to the most advanced technology firms in the West. Do these realities align with the distortions you are being told about Iran and its people?

Today, the world stands at crossroads. Continuing along the path of confrontation is more costly and futile than ever before. The choice between confrontation and engagement is both real and consequential; its outcome will shape the future for generations to come. Throughout its millennia of proud history, Iran has outlasted many aggressors. All that remains of them are tarnished names in history, while Iran endures–resilient, dignified, and proud.

 

Tucker Carlson and Dave Smith

44 COMMENTS

  1. US messages via Witkoff and intermediaries are not negotiations: Araghchi | Talk to Al Jazeera
    Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi tells Talk to Al Jazeera that Iran is not negotiating with the United States, despite ongoing exchanges of messages, including direct communication from US envoy Steve Witkoff.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fgFq_jZwUYQ

  2. Iran’s Missiles SMASH Israel, Trump’s Bluff CALLED w/ Patrick Henningsen & Col. Larry Wilkerson

    Danny Haiphong
    Geopolitical analyst and war reporter Patrick Henningsen and former Chief of Staff to the State Department Col. Lawrence Wilkerson join to react to Trump’s war address and Iran’s stunning response as the war takes a turn for the worst for the US and Israeli warmongers.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C8JHgCzcMbA

  3. Will ALL THE WARMONGERS, POLITICIANS, GOVERNMENT AGENCIES, ABC, MASS MEDIA AND THEIR SHOCK JOKES JUST SET ASIDE THE FIRST THREE MINUTES AND LISTEN TO DAVE SMITH?
    GETTING THE PICTURE?
    Or are you A CRIMINAL or all too dumb to realise?
    I test the credibility of the goat up the top paddock before I feed it. The food provided is dependent upon passing this simple credibility test.
    I simplY ask the goat: DO YOU BELIEVE THE UNSCIENTIFIC, TIN FOIL HAT OFFICIAL 911 GOVERNMENT CONSPIRACY THEORY THAT IT WAS PLANNED AND CARRIED OUT BY SOME MAD MUSLIM TERRORISTS and NOT A ‘INSIDE JOB’?
    My goat is well fed!
    807

    • Now ask yourself
      Why are we feeding the CORRUPT fools referred to?
      They do not have the intellect or integrity of the average Billy goat and have spent at least a century getting our familY MEMBERS killed AND SABOTAGING OUR COUNTRY FOR THE GLOBALIST THIEVES AND KILLERS.
      817

  4. 17:06 first up at whatreallyhappened.com
    URGENT ALARM – RE ARTEMIS DISASTER.
    “F MICROSOFT”.
    🤷‍♂️🙀837

    • Yeah, the old ‘slip stick’, I did physics, chemistry and various mathematics using that device. Unfortunately, I often was off by one decimal point. You had to think through the equation and approximate what the answer would be, then the slip stick would hone in on the actual number.

      Perhaps that may indicate I’m an old fart, but back then it taught you to think.

  7. A simpleton’s view. The west is intentionally dismantled economies destroyed to pave the way for the east’s takeover. Passing the baton in the relay, same team since 1913 and before. It is crown cabal communism, as agreed at Yalta. America demolishes CCP rebuilds. For proof, go for a drive around Sydney, if you can afford it?
    Let’s pray for all who are suffering.

  9. Looking at the jugular article, I only see 4 comments at 955 am today
    WHERE ARE ALL THE REST?
    I feel guilty about tutles stuck on fence posts and felt obliged to guide one down safely.
    So out of curiosity I searched how.
    Only information for a turtle predicament might be found at the civil aviation website under the CASR ‘105-
    ‘Guide for parachuting from an aircraft’.
    Turtles might adapt their decent with the general principles.
    A serious adaption, according to my source who witnessed it, is when returning from the moon, catch a transport plane flying at high altitude, get into a safety pod and be chucked out of the back of the plane.
    Drift down with cameras then rolling, float for awhile in the sea ad be picked up by a helicopter and appear there from to the ships deck before the selected tourists.
    I hope our Artemis lot find it just as useful.
    Amazing what curiosity come up with.
    1007

  10. Re the pretence of celebrating the Passover and Exodus from Egypt by those who call themselves Jews today

    The Jews are of Esau (brother of Jacob) from Idumea, but not of Israel or Judah; Jewish Encyclopedia, 1925, vol. 5, page 41.

    Revelation 3:9 “Indeed I will make those of the synagogue of Satan, who say they are Jews and are not, but lie—indeed I will make them come and worship before your feet, and to know that I have loved you.”

    The END of this “AGE” – The New World Order! It is the EDOMITE JEWS who are bringing the N.W.O. about!

    Esdras 6:9 …”For Esau is the end of this age, and Jacob is the beginning of the age that follows”…

    Obadiah 1:18-19 KJV
    And the house of Jacob shall be a fire, and the house of Joseph a flame, and the house of Esau for stubble, and they shall kindle in them, and devour them; and there shall not be any remaining of the house of Esau; for the LORD hath spoken it. And they of the south shall possess the mount of Esau; and they of the plain the Philistines: and they shall possess the fields of Ephraim, and the fields of Samaria: and Benjamin shall possess Gilead.

    Jesus Christ is the end of the pure blood Chosen line — Judah/Tamar, Pharez, Naason, David — Ruth, Mary that was chosen to antecede Him. Christ has not fathered physical descendents, therefore there is no pure blood – physical line of Judah that can be said to have descended from Christ. Those who hate Christianity and call themselves Gods Chosen People in the flesh are liars – those of all nations who call on the name of Christ are of Judah in Spirit and therefore Semites. Jesus Christ – the King of Judah. Gen. 38 11-30, Ruth 4 18-22

  13. Well it seems that all pundits have a theory and know the gig.
    To help, try;
    ‘Ben Fulford report 30/3/26 kharzarian Mafia rule ending……… Israel invaded’.
    At rumormillnews.com – breaking stories
    On 2/4/26 – 14:35:03
    Let’s hope he has something right, but you will not know unless the report with evidence is read.
    1147

    • Has Israel ( the satanists) been left for last?
      NOTE that Ben suggests that the (fake) Trump will and his enablers (for Israel Satanist’s?) will be arrested.
      Now what a movie that would be – Nasum Dorma’. (That was heard often when the real ? T was there.
      I have not heard it for some time.
      Well, T used to say ‘we have caught them all’. We will soon know if he was right, but the people have to e shown!. Ref: ‘Q’. And the evidence irrefutable!⚖️⚖️
      1157

      • I recall a ‘Q’ drop: the first ‘arrest’ will shock the world’. Paraphrased.
        ‘Q’ is noted for deliberate miss spells.
        What if we add a ‘s’ to ‘arrest’.?
        1203

  15. This article is a brilliant piece of work.

    To many people religion fulfills the question of “where did I come from and where will I go when my life ends?” (When we die, we humans like all life forms, shrivel and turn to dust.) In my opinion that is the only reason for religion and all its stories and denominations. But it creates a great benefit for “divide and rule”.

    I have always been a “man of peace” but with this current situation I wish that Israel would just disappear with all its evilness. Mind you the U.S. is not far behind in evilness. Wanting to control all other countries near or far. If it can’t control, destroy. “Seven countries with Iran, last?”

    If Australia had had strong leadership, maybe we would have been No 8, with all our advantages of resources and climate. Think on that.

    One thing that this war has opened to reality is that Iran is not a country of “goat herders” but has many brilliant professionals. Not only have they produced weaponry that U S has not yet thought of, but they have kept that science from the prying eyes of the CIA and others.

    I hope that if BIbi is still alive, when this is over, both he and Donald Trump will face a Nuremburg Trial for they have committed far worse crimes than Adolf Hilter.

    • “Yesterday in Moscow and Berlin, the Non- Aggression and Mutual Assistance Pact-which had originally entered into force upon signature-was accorded final ratification. In Moscow this pact was as warmly welcomed as you welcomed it here. I second every word of the Russian Foreign Commissar Molotov’s speech.

      Our goals: I am determined to resolve
      1. the question of Danzig and
      2. the question of the Corridor, and to see to it that
      3. a change of tone comes about in German-Polish relations, so as to warrant peaceful coexistence.”
      • Adolf Hitler – speech to the German Reichstag on Poland – September 1, 1939

      Earlier in the same speech
      “For months a problem has tormented all of us. Long ago the Diktat of Versailles bestowed this problem on us. In its depravity and degeneracy it has now become insufferable. Danzig was a German city and is a German city! The Corridor was German and is German! These regions owe their cultural development exclusively to the German Volk. Without this Volk, these eastern regions would still be plunged in the depths of barbarism.

      Danzig was torn from us! Poland annexed the Corridor! The German minorities living there are being persecuted in the vilest manner imaginable. In the years 1919 and 1920 over one million men of German blood were forced to leave their homeland.

      As always, I sought to bring about a change by peaceful means, by offering proposals to remedy this situation which meanwhile had become unbearable.

      It is a lie when others in the world claim that we sought to carry out our revisions by the use of force exclusively. Fifteen years before National Socialism’s rise to power, there was ample opportunity to carry out these revisions by peaceful means. Nothing of the sort was done. In any event, I made proposals for a revision not once, but many times.

      You know that all these proposals were rejected. There is no need for me to enumerate them: my proposals on the limitation of arms; if necessary, even for the complete elimination of weaponry; my proposals for limited warfare, for the abolition of methods employed in modern warfare which, in my eyes, are hardly reconcilable with international law. You know of my proposals on the necessity of restoring German sovereignty to the territory of the German Reich. You know of the endless attempts I made for a peaceful resolution of the problem of Austria, and later of the problem of the Sudetenland, of Bohemia and Moravia. It was all for naught.

      There is one thing that is simply not possible: to demand that an impossible situation be resolved by means of peaceful revision-and then to consistently deny resolution by peaceful means.

      So there is really no comparison between Adolf Hitler and Churchill/Roosevelt/Stalin in the 1930s and 1940s and Trump/Hegseth/Netanyahu/Lindsey Graham and the rest of the Epstein-Spielberg cabal tod

    • “If a British statesman today demands of me that all problems related to Germany’s vital interests first be discussed with England, then I could as well insist that all issues pending in Great Britain had first to be discussed with us. It is entirely possible that the English would retort to this: “The Germans have no business being in Palestine!” Indeed, we do not want to be in Palestine. And just as we Germans have no business being in Palestine, the English have no business being in our German Lebensraum! And now they declare the issues at stake to be general questions of law and legitimacy. This opinion would hold good only if they were universally binding ones. They tell us that we have no right to do this or no right to do that. I would like to ask in turn: What right have the English – to cite only one example – to go about shooting Arabs in Palestine only because these stand up to defend their homeland? Who gives them this right? We in Central Europe, on the other hand, have not slaughtered thousands.”
      • Adolf Hitler – speech in Wilhelmshaven – April 1, 1939

    • “For it does not suffice that a few statesmen, uninterested in the fate of those immediately concerned, come together at the conference table and arrive at resolutions. Instead, it is necessary that someone, who shares in the life of these areas himself, works to restore an enduring situation there. The Western democracies have done nothing, at least in recent times, to prove their capacity to work for the establishment of such orderly situations. The example of Palestine amply proves that it is better to attend to current tasks and to solve these in a reasonable fashion, than to preoccupy oneself with problems which lie within the vital interests and spheres of interest of other peoples who are better equipped to deal with them.”
      • Adolf Hitler – speech before the Reichstag – Berlin, October 6, 1939

    • “Equally, it appears to have slipped Mr. Roosevelt’s mind that Palestine is not being occupied by German troops but by English ones. By brute force, England is curtailing Palestinian freedom and is robbing the Palestinians of their independence to the advantage of Jewish intruders for whose cause the Palestinians suffer the most cruel of abuses. The Arabs living in this territory assuredly have not complained to Roosevelt of German aggressions. Rather, in persistent appeals to international public opinion, the Arabs lament the barbaric methods by means of which England seeks to overpower a people who loves its freedom and fights only to defend it.”
      • Adolf Hitler – speech before the Reichstag – reply to F D Roosevelt – Berlin, April 28, 1939

    • “When the Zionists try to make the rest of the world believe that the new national consciousness of the Jews will be satisfied by the establishment of a Palestinian state, the Jews thereby cleverly dupe the simple-minded goyim. They haven’t the slightest intention of building up a Jewish state in Palestine so as to live there. What they really want is a central organization for their international world-swindle, one with sovereign rights and freedom from outside control–in other words, a refuge for convicted lowlifes and a training ground for budding criminals.

      As a sign of their growing confidence and sense of security, a certain portion of them openly and impudently proclaim their Jewish race, while another part hypocritically pretends that they are still German, French, or English.” [or American]
      – Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf (Thomas Dalton translation) Volume 1 Chapter 11

  17. Aussiemal,
    Matter for you, but if you are to return ! to dust as our bodies will, why did you bother to exist?
    Gets complicated but I could not be bothered!
    517

  18. And because it is Good Friday…
    Parts 1 and 3 from Fr. James Mawdsley (on Rumble or Odysee) – Part 2 in my earlier comment at 5:15 pm)
    • HN10 1/3 Standing for Christ on Good Friday – Scripture and Tradition — Fr JM (James Mawdsley)
    https://odysee.com/@tarsus:c/144-HN10-1-2-Standing-for-Christ-on-Good-Friday-COMPRESSED:3

    • HN10 3/3: How the Jewish Question Can Be Answered by Church and State. (The End of the HN.) – Scripture and Tradition — Fr JM (James Mawdsley)
    https://odysee.com/@tarsus:c/HN10-3-3-What-to-do-CHURCH-STATE-COMPRESSED:4

    • Hinduism, Judaism and Roman Catholicism were originated from Babylonian Baal worship.

      In the year 1215 Pope Innocent III decreed the doctrine of transubstantiation

      “………..The most important enactment of the council concerned the theology of the mass. For the first time, the doctrine of transubstantiation was officially defined. The definition reads:

      There is indeed one universal Church of the faithful. Outside this Church, no one at all is saved. Within this Church, the Priest, Jesus Christ, is also Himself the sacrifice. His body and blood are genuinely contained in the sacrament of the altar, beneath the outward appearances of bread and wine. By God’s power, the bread is transubstantiated into Christ’s body, and the wine into His blood. Thus we receive from Him what He received from us [that is, flesh and blood, which Christ received from us in the incarnation]. In this way the mystery of unity [between Christ and the Church] is made concrete. No one can carry out this sacrament except the priest, who has been correctly ordained according to the power of the Church’s keys, which Jesus Christ Himself gave to the apostles and those who followed after them.

      The word transubstantiation (change of substance) had been used before 1215 by men such as Hildebert of Tours (d. 1134), but the Fourth Lateran Council made the word and the associated concept official Roman Catholic orthodoxy………….”

      https://learn.ligonier.org/articles/13th-century

  19. The Shah of Iran Speaks Bluntly About the US ‘Jewish Lobby’

    CBS 60 Minutes – Video

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ksu5YHK5ZDo

    In this October 1976 interview, the Shah of Iran, Mohammed Reza Pahlevi, speaks to Mike Wallace about the power in the US of the “Jewish lobby.” It is “strong,” he says, and it is “controlling many things,” including “newspapers, medias, banks, finance.” And the Shah agrees when asked if “the Jewish community” in the US “makes the media reflect their view of foreign policy.” Runtime: 1:55 mins.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.