Home Law Betrayal of Our Westminster Judicial System

Betrayal of Our Westminster Judicial System

78
General Flynn, Photo: lawandcrime.com

by Brae Antcliffe BA LLB (retired NSW barrister of 50 years in the law; occasional crown prosecutor)

Linked within this short observation is a link to a recent interview at a X22 report.

The first 20 minutes contains a report by Dr Dave Janda and his observations of the conduct by a court in the US relating to the prosecution of General Flynn

I doubt if more than a handful of lawyers in Australia have heard of these proceedings.

To save finger tapping I ask readers to just scroll down to the link and listen to Dr Janda for the 20 minutes or so to appreciate the history and present situation with a decision to be handed down by the court shortly.

The proceedings are truly a disgraceful example of the abuse of power by a rare example of the judiciary in the United States. The judicial system is being used to prevent Flynn from exposing systematic corruption at high levels in the US hierarchy over many decades.

As a retired barrister practicing in criminal law, I express my deep concern for the conduct of the original prosecution of General Flynn, now being exposed as a tragedy in the administration of justice in the United States.

I suggest that It is every lawyer’s duty in Australia to be acquainted with this injustice so that it is not perpetrated as a precedent here in Australia in the prosecution of any criminal case in the Commonwealth.

What happened in this courtroom is hugely significant, and sends a chilling message.

Dave Janda was listening in on proceedings via phone, and said it was simply a “goat rodeo.” As Janda says in the interview:

“It was a hearing that should have lasted, according to my friends who are in the legal profession … anywhere between 15 minutes and at most an hour… Flynn had not lied and that evidence had been tampered with and edited. And that evidence that showed his innocence, what’s called exculpatory evidence, was withheld from General Flynn and withheld from the court and the justice department…”

All prosecutors of any criminal case are duty-bound in Australia to ensure that any exculpatory material discovered in any investigation must be served upon any accused charged with a crime.

This hearing, which was to move on the motion of dismissal of all charges, turned into the most horrendous example of a failure to apply the law. This is exemplified by the abominable corrupt charging and prosecuting of General Flynn and a Judicial attitude to promote the original injustice contrary to the prosecution wishing to not proceed.

I bring this to the notice of my past colleagues, and in the public interest.

Please listen to the first 20 minutes of the interview:

David H. Janda, M.D. was a practicing orthopedic surgeon based in Ann Arbor, Michigan before his retirement in January 2017. Dr Janda currently hosts The Operation Freedom Radio Show which broadcasts every Sunday from 2-5 PM Eastern.

 

SHARE

78 COMMENTS

  1. The replica is unfolding in this country. WITH the media as complicit in this terrible case.

    https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-10-19/child-stealing-network-accused-granted-bail-in-brisbane-court/10396726

    The prosecution have been caught with their pants down their knees — having withheld SO MUCH EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE.

    The parallels are frightening. “chilling”

    Where do we go from here?

    Australians need not look to the Flynn’s case for this “Betrayal of Our Westminster Judicial System”, they can look at a court in Queensland.

    Brae the same applies to this case of the good DR W RUSSELL PRIDGEON et al. Their case Pridgeon, O’Dea, Greer etc “turned into the most horrendous example of a failure to apply the law.”

    “All prosecutors of any criminal case are duty-bound in Australia to ensure that any exculpatory material discovered in any investigation must be served upon any accused charged with a crime.”

    But on top of this the media are supporting the pedo-protecting-prosecutors.

    • “All prosecutors of any criminal case are duty-bound in Australia to ensure that any exculpatory material discovered in any investigation must be served upon any accused charged with a crime.”

      Here’s an oldie, but a goodie, poor Martin Bryant. Somehow the prosecution ‘forgot’ to disclose the existence of the exculpatory evidence of the fingerprints and DNA from the tray the real killer ate from. Also, that Bryant’s AR-10 was held by Terry Hill and Bryant had never seen the substituted SLR. Then there was Jim Laycock’s multiple statements saying that the killer was not Bryant, and then there was…..

      https://gumshoenews.com/2019/03/31/justice-in-the-lucky-country/

      • Yeah.
        There might already have been truckloads of articles on the subject but, so far as understanding what the justice system is all about you don’t really need to look any further

  2. It seems strange to me that politicians who make laws then need judges to interpret them. Why don’t politicians make their so called laws absolutely clear in the first place?

    The Westminster System

    At the heart of the system is the concept of the separation of powers between the three branches of government:

    The Legislature: the Parliament, which makes the law
    The Executive: the Governor, Prime Minister/Premier, Ministers, departments and agencies, which implement the law
    The Judiciary: the courts, which interpret and apply the law.

    Another key feature of the Westminster System is an apolitical, professional public service providing impartial advice to the Government of the day and implementing the Government’s policies and programs. ln addition, as was first proposed in the Northcote-Trevelyan report to the UK House of Commons in 1854, a core requirement of the Westminster System is that the recruitment and promotion of employees in the public service is on the basis of merit.

    https://www.psc.nsw.gov.au/employmentportal/ethics-conduct/behaving-ethically/behaving-ethically-guide/section-1/the-westminster-system

  3. This is hard to understand. Per Article II of the Con, “Prez shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed.”

    The AG is the prez’s agent. If he says “Drop the charges” there is no scope for a court to continue. I don’t know why the judge’s colleagues would not laugh hm out of court. Must be more to it.

  4. As I listened to Dave Janda recite various incidents in court, I had my own ‘flashbacks’ of similar incidents in Australia. However, I never had ALL of them in one case! – Especially in a simple motion before the court that was supported by both parties. 15 minutes and we should be out of there.

    It would be a shame if judge Sullivan had a fatal accident and another judge was assigned the case.

  5. PROTOCOL No. 15

    WORLD CONQUEST THROUGH WORLD JEWISH GOVERNMENT

    Under our influence the execution of the laws of the GOYIM has been reduced to a minimum. The prestige of the law has been exploded by the liberal interpretations introduced into this sphere. In the most important and fundamental affairs and questions, JUDGES DECIDE AS WE DICTATE TO THEM, see matters in the light wherewith we enfold them for the administration of the GOYIM, of course, through persons who are our tools though we do not appear to have anything in common with them – by newspaper opinion or by other means …. Even senators and the higher administration accept our counsels. The purely brute mind of the GOYIM is incapable of use for analysis and observation, and still more for the foreseeing whither a certain manner of setting a question may tend.

  6. Bar association exposed –

    “………All Bar Attorneys throughout the world pledge a solemn oath to the Temple, even though some may not be aware that this is what they are doing, because their only given an Inferior understanding of Law, enough to keep them brainwashed into the Temple’s agenda. The Bar is not a Constitutional establishment of the United States of America Republic, but rather its the British Association establishment, under the Knights Templar’s, who are controlled by the Rothschild banking family……………..

    http://www.macquirelatory.com/Bar%20Association%20Exposed.htm

    P.S. for the People: BAR Attorneys passed a very sneaky law in 1980 that says they represent both sides in a case! But it is a felony for an attorney to take money from someone he does not represent. So if an attorney bothers you, tell him he’s fired! Enjoy!

    http://freedom-school.com/open-letter-to-agents-of-the-crown.pdf

    • On that subject…
      Facts You May Not Know

      1.The UNITED STATES OF AMERICA was incorporated in London in 1783. The United States of America is a territory
      of Great Britain. The Colonists did not win the Revolutionary War. The British troops did not leave until 1796.
      Republican v. Sweets, 1 Dallas 43; Treaty, 8 Stat. 116; The Society for Propagating the Gospel & c .v. New Haven, 8 Wheat
      464, Treaty of Paris (Peace), 8 Stat. 80, IRS Publication 6209, Articles of Confederation, October 20, 1774.

      King George III of England financed both sides of the Revolutionary War.
      Treaty of Versailles, July 15, 1782; Treaty of Paris (Peace), 8 Stat. 80.
      The IRS is not a U.S. Government agency. It is a Debt Collection Agency of the International Monetary fund (IMF).
      Diversified Metal Products v. IRS, et. al.,CV-93-405E-EJE, U. S. D. C. I., Public Law 94-564, Senate Report 94-1148
      pg. 596, Bankruptcy Reorganization PlanNo. 26, Public Law 102-391.
      The IMF is an agency of the United Nations (UN).
      Black’s Law, 6th Ed. pg. 816.
      The U.S. has not had a Treasury since 1921.
      41 Stat. Ch. 214 pg. 654.
      New York City is defined in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) as the United Nations
      Rudolph Giuliani stated on C-Span that “New York City is the capitol of the world” and he is correct.
      20 CFR Ch. 111, subpart B 422.103 (b) (2).
      No judicial courts, nor judges, have existed in America since 1789. Executive Administrators, not judges,
      enforce Statues and Codes. FRC v. GE, 281 US 464, Keller v. PE, 261 US 428, 1 Stat. 138-178. See also the 11th
      Amendment. This was the abolishment of all inferior courts to hear cases of law or equity (this means that all courts
      below the “one supreme courts”, not the U. S. Supreme Court.
      You cannot use the U.S. Constitution to defend yourself because you are not a party to it.
      Padelford Fay & Co. v. The Mayor and Alderman of the City of Savannah, 14 Georgia 438, 520.
      (Use instead the Bill of Rights)
      You own no property. slaves cannot own property. Read the Deed to the property that you think you own.
      You are listed as a Tenant. Senate Document 43, 73rd Congress, 1st. Session
      We are slaves and own nothing, not even who we think are our children.
      Tilman v. Roberts, 108 so. 62: Van Koten v. Koten, 154 N. E. 146; Senate document 43 and 73rd Congress
      1st, Session, Wynehammer v. People, 13 N. R. REP 378, 481.
      Great Britain is owned by the Vatican.
      Treaty of Verona, 1213
      The Pope can abolish any law in the United States. (It is an presumption once again!)
      Elements of Ecclesiastical Law, Vol. 1, 53,54
      https://pepehateme.wordpress.com/2014/04/06/elements-of-ecclesiastical-law/

      13.We are Human Capital
      See Executive Order 13037

      We are enemies of the State.
      Trading with the Enemy Act or 1917 and 1933, October 6, 1917, under the Adr, Section 2, subdivision (c) Ch. 106
      Enemy defined “other citizens of the United States…” March 9, 1933, Ch 106, Section 5, subdivision (b) of the
      Act of Oct. 6, 1917 (40 sta. L. 411) amended as follows : “…any person within the United States.” Se H. R. 149
      Public law No.1

      15.Your name when spelled in all capital letters is a corporation:
      A Cestui Que Vie Trust. —Cannon law

      “The People” do not include you and me since our names are all Capital Letter fictional names.
      Barron v. Mayor of city coundil of Baltimore, 32 U. S. 243
      A 1040 form is for tribute paid to Great Britain (and the Vatican)
      IRS Publication 6209 IMF decoding manual
      Everything in the “United States” is for sale: roads, bridges, schools, hospitals, water plants, prisons, airports, etc.
      (Who bought Klamath Lake in California?) See Executive Order 12803
      It is not the duty of the police to protect you. Their job is to protect the Corporation and arrest Code breakers.
      Sapp. v. Tallahassee, 348 SO.2d363; Reiff v. city of Philadelphia, 477 F. Supp. 1262; Lynch v. N. C. Dept. of Justice,
      376 S. E. 2d 247
      The FCC, CIA, FBI, NASA and all the other alphabet gangs were never a part of the United States Government, even
      though the “U. S. Government” held shares of stock in the various agencies.
      U. S. v. Strang, 254 U. S. 491; Lewis v. U. S., 6880 F.2d 1239.

      • I could put it more simply… the famous founding fathers merely established a faux monarchy and ensured its survival by excising the words of Thomas Paine from the Constitution. The US has never been a democracy and has always been run by the secret government.

        • Yes it has and it is nothing more than a vast criminal consortium at the expense of taxpayers. Its much worse now because of the avast amount of money spent on war and surveillance with all of the technology for megalomaniac control freaks who are deranged

  7. It so happens occasionally in Australia in criminal courts after a accused is indicted, that the crown prosecutor may tell the court that the crown will offer no evidence.
    FULL STOP: the court discharges the accused and that is it.
    Clearly Dr Janda’s opinion of the court’s decision that it is a political set up is correct
    AND that is the tragedy, the court does not serve the function as a alleged court.
    As Janda indicates, it is just a goat Show.

  8. Before I listen to the video I will just like to put down what I heard on “live” al-Jazeera this morning, a press conference with Trump doctors who were preparing to let him rise from the dead after 72 hours (the usual rise from dead period). One brave reporter asked about hydroxychloroquine. The spokesman doctor who was very relaxed up until then made a very conspicuous involuntary “gulp” with his throat then almost as if off balance said something like “we won’t be discussing any specific regimes”.
    Sounds like advocating HCQ is a career-stopper. The knives will be out.

  9. The CORPORATION GOVERNMENT or the unconstitutional CORPORATION needs to be UN-INCORPORATED! We are under a ruse and unfortunately most people are unaware of it. The separation of powers is a myth and people need to understand and realise it is a myth and a complete fiction. I will endeavor to prove it to you as it is not difficult to provide the correct information and evidence in abundance. Most Americans and Australians do not understand the type of system that we have unfortunately, nor do they understand the framework of what is ‘supposed’ to be. Both are ruled and controlled by foreign dictation. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ABN CORPORATION vs. The United States of America and THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA vs. the Commonwealth of Australia. Both Corporation NAMES are registered in Washington D.C. for those who do not know. This knowledge seems to become more widespread now. We are dealing with, or should I say the ‘commercial entities’ is dealing with us. Let me be quite clear and frank.

    We are not under the auspices and protection of a genuine and legitimate government as we all think of government and what that means and how we were taught in school.

    Corporate Australia
    http://corpau.blogspot.com.au/2015/04/indemnity-to-all-persons-acting-under.html

    Planned Surrender of Australia 1989 – by ED Butler
    http://www.manbook.biz/2015/05/14/planned-surrender-of-australia-1989-by-ed-butler/ Youtube

    • Role of the Governor

      (One of the group commented on this document)
      The Governor of Victoria is appointed by the Queen, on the advice of the Premier, to act as her representative as Head of State in Victoria. Since the Australia Acts of 1986, it is the Governor, and not the Queen, who exercises all the powers of the Head of State, and he or she is not subject to the direction or supervision of the Monarch. Upon appointment, he becomes a Viceroy. The Governor’s main responsibilities fall into three categories; constitutional, ceremonial and community engagement

      This statement is patently wrong and treacherous

      Firstly it does not mention which queen it is referring to, whether it is the Queen of England and the UK or the Queen of Australia or some artificial corporate queen as registered with ASIC (see attached)

      In any case, the assumption of the Governor of Victoria as being authorised under the Australia Act is wrong

      The Australia Act only applies if at all to the Governor General as representative of the Queen of Australia ( whoever that is)

      The Governor General cannot and is not authorised to assign any powers to the governors of the States because the states fall under a different authority and the Governor General’s authority is strictly restricted to the Queen of Australia ( not the Queen of England and the UK )

      Secondly, The Australia Act is void because it was not given proper lawful assent by the States nor had the states such as Western Australia and Queensland held a referendum as per their own constitution prescribed in order to be included under the Australia Act or to have their constitution altered as the Australia Act purports to do.

      So anything relying on the Australia act or enacted after or as a result of the Australia Act 1986 is invalid as is the Supreme Court Act 1986

      The Australia Act falsely purports to amend the constitution of Western Australia as follows:

      14 Amendment of Constitution Act of Western Australia

      (1) The Constitution Act 1889 of the State of Western Australia is in this section referred to as the Principal Act.

      (2) Section 50 of the Principal Act is amended in subsection (3):

      (a) by omitting from paragraph (a):

      (i) “and Signet”; and

      (ii) “constituted under Letters Patent under the Great Seal of the United Kingdom”;

      (b) by omitting from paragraph (b):

      (i) “and Signet”; and

      (ii) “whenever and so long as the office of Governor is vacant or the Governor is incapable of discharging the duties of administration or has departed
      from Western Australia”; and

      (c) by omitting from paragraph (c):

      (i) “under the Great Seal of the United Kingdom”; and

      (ii) “during a temporary absence of the Governor for a short period from the seat of Government or from the State”.

      (3) Section 51 of the Principal Act is amended:

      (a) by omitting subsection (1); and

      (b) by omitting from subsection (2):

      (i) “(2)”;

      (ii) “this section and in”; and

      (iii) “and the expression ‘Signet’ means the seal commonly used for the sign manual of the Sovereign or the seal with which documents are sealed by
      the Secretary of State in the United Kingdom on behalf of the Sovereign”.

      This cannot be done without a referendum of the electors of WA

      The relevant points in the Western Australian Constitution of 1889 are:

      under Miscellaneus section 73 of theAct

      and

      (g) the Bill has also prior to such presentation been approved by the electors in accordance with this section,

      and a Bill assented to consequent upon its presentation in contravention of this subsection shall be of no effect as an Act.

      (3) On a day fixed by the Governor by Order in Council, being a day not sooner than 2 months, and not later than 6 months, after the passage through the Legislative Council and the Legislative Assembly of a Bill of a kind referred to in subsection (2), the question for the approval or otherwise of the Bill shall be submitted to the electors qualified to vote for the election of members of the Legislative Assembly according to the provisions of the Electoral Act 1907.

      (4) When the Bill is submitted to the electors the vote shall be taken in such manner as is fixed by law.

      (5) If a majority of the electors voting approve the Bill, it shall be presented to the Governor for assent by or in the name of the Queen.

      (6) Any person entitled to vote at a general election of members of the Legislative Assembly is entitled to bring proceedings in the Supreme Court for a

      declaration, injunction or other remedy to enforce the provisions of this section either before or after a Bill of a kind referred to in subsection (2) is presented for assent by or in the name of the Queen.

    • Presentation by Butler was a magnificent history lesson. Much new information to me. Politicians are far worse enemies than I gave them credit for. Traitors, traitors, most of the leaders of politics fit this title. As well as War Criminals.

  10. Only the people can reclaim democracy http://www.cla.asn.au/News/only-the-people-can-reclaim-democracy/

    Corruption fighter Tony Fitzgerald made these comments in association with the 2014 Griffith University Tony Fitzgerald Lecture in September…

    It would not occur to today’s politicians that power should be used only for the State’s “peace welfare and good government” or that legal requirements are conventionally supplemented by ethical norms.

    Political reform is therefore a task for the community. If Queenslander’s want a free, fair, tolerant society, good governance and honest public administration, a sufficient number of voters must make it clear that they will decline to vote for any party which does not first satisfy them that it will exercise power only for the public benefit.

    It’s difficult to perceive what legitimate reason a party seeking election in a democracy could have for declining to make commitments such as the following:

    the public to be fully and accurately informed promptly and not to be misled;
    all government decisions and actions to be taken for the common benefit without regard to personal, political or other considerations;
    all people to be treated equally with no person given special treatment or superior access or influence; and
    all public appointments to be made on merit.
    Effective democracy needs principled politicians, an independent, impartial judiciary plus, as the American author Norman Mailer said, “individuals not only ready to enjoy freedom but to undergo the heavy labor of maintaining it.” That task includes blunt criticism of political misconduct. As President John F. Kennedy said, “without debate, without criticism no administration and no country can succeed and no republic can survive.”

  12. Reclaim Democracy Restoring Citizen Authority Over Corporations American
    http://reclaimdemocracy.org/

    Revoke Corporate Personhood — Reclaim Democracy! is on Facebook.
    https://www.facebook.com/ReclaimDemocracy

    How a clerical error made corporations “people”
    http://www.hightowerlowdown.org/node/664#.VT1xCM015NU

    The fanciful notion that a corporation is a “person”
    http://www.hightowerlowdown.org/node/2095#.VT1vgc015NU
    It’s all presumption and abuse of power and corruption

    “The corporations don’t have to lobby the government anymore. They are the government.”
    http://www.hightowerlowdown.org/node/2093#.VT1vCc015NU

  13. THE ASYMMETRY OF THE SEPARATION OF POWERS
    http://www.murdoch.edu.au/School-of-Law/_document/WA-jurist-documents/WAJ_Vol3_2012_Greenfeld—The-Asymmetry-of-the-Separation-of-Powers.pdf

    This requires that the judiciary, the executive and the legislature all remain distinct from each other to ensure that the different arms of government do not encroach upon each other. The quote that this essay will be addressing is whether the separation of powers doctrine has been compromised to such an extent that it no longer exists. This essay will critically address this by firstly defining the separation of powers doctrine and examining the history of the separation of powers doctrine. Also this essay will show the degree to which the doctrine has been compromised. Although the doctrine has been compromised to an extent, it still upholds the vital and necessary principles that protect the rights of the people from an abuse of power by the government.
    (Last sentence:That is a matter of opinion and I will provide evidence under constitutional articles provided, as this is not the case and needs to be tested)

    The separation of powers doctrine requires that each arm of government should be separate and not exercise the powers or functions of the others….

  15. ON TOPIC re: video
    Just after 20:00 he says … Pence will be moved out and Flynn will be moved in – Flynn knows where all the bodies are buried – weapons being run into Isis by Obama and Hillary …

    • The word credit used incorrectly. I have a plastic card which I use for passing on payment to a trader. Surely I have credit to pay. I don’t pass debt to that trader. However, in this upside down world my card is called a debit card and if I was, as in the past, using bank money, that should be called a debit card as I would be in debt to the bank. Screwy?

  16. The court system was corrupt thirty years ago, nothing has changed if anything it is worse.
    I took a builder developer to court for not paying me for work done. Won twice in court.
    Still had to pay legal costs of 70k, otherwise they were going to sell house to get the money.
    The guy that stole my blood sweat and tears a multi millionaire. Everything legal here is bullshit.
    There is a law that protects the rich and no law that protects the poor.
    In desperation, I asked a QC (married to a second cousin) for help. He took the documents saying not a problem. Called him after waiting for a few months. He said, “back off, or the guy will kill you.”
    Advance Australia Fare !!!

        • The price being a sub contractor in a deregulated industry.
          Another job, 22 years ago, the butcher come developer told me, “that he wouldn’t even pay his mother.”
          Still had the tattoo number on his arm.

          • Suffering creates suffering for everyman.
            Jesus gave two universal laws for peace and prosperity for all men/women kind. Simple pure true.
            Theoretical books and now digital are educated exponential perversions of real law, that is total in two sentences.
            All Glory to Him.

          • “In common understanding, the word “credit” implies something Good. A positive. Something that adds to, increases, or improves. “Well done! That work is a credit to you.”

            A “credit” does not add (+) to an account. It subtracts from it (-). So Christ is the account holder. “If you don’t work you don’t eat” Credits are accrued from positive energy expended.

            1 Peter 1:17 “And if ye call on the Father, who without respect of persons judgeth according to every man’s work, pass the time of your sojourning here in fear”:

            ‘A labourer is worthy of his hire’

            The General Epistle of Barnabus, chapter 9

            ‘Neither, says he, will you eat the eagle, nor the hawk, nor the kite, nor the crow; that is, you must not keep company with the kind of men who do not know how to get themselves food by their labor and sweat, but injuriously steal the things of others and watch how to lay snares for them, when at the same time they appear to live in perfect innocence.”

            Money lenders/Banks come to mind.

    • 56 I would say that the ju dicial systems moral code is these days based on Judaism’s
      Babylonian Talmud. Statute law is the Law of the Sea on which the Pirates of Finance are in control.

      To be an Orthodox Jew is to agree with the Talmud that, “It is permitted to deceive a goy.” (Baba Kama 113b) ,

    • ’56’, I’m sorry that happened to you and if we lived in a just world, said developers would be stoned to death in the public square.

      It seems that the developer did a ‘Donald Trump’ on you.

      Trump has a history of not paying out contractors and somehow, miraculously, gets away with it every time.

  17. Congratulations Brae for bringing this to our attention. It is unfortunately not a unique case. For those who have been following the Assange extradition hearing in London will know that the term “British Justice” is a contradiction in terms. There are manifold examples in the US and when one looks at the complete indifference of the Australian government to what is being done to Assange there can be no confidence that Australia is going down the exact same path where the rights of the citizen under the law are being shredded beyond recognition.

  18. As I have been involved in 2 Royal Commissions and I say where were the BAR lawyers with all of the miscarriages of Justice in this country? Absent and without comment…
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_miscarriage_of_justice_cases#Australia

    Of course nothing has been said or done for Martin Bryant with the highly publicised Kangaroo Court… the patsy set up for the Port Arthur Massacre. It is a corrupt and criminal system by the police, the judiciary with the aiding and abetting by the prostitute MSM propaganda apparatus

    Evil Freemasons are controlling this sinister system who have taken a Oath to a foreign power acting with an abuse of power and with impunity.

    We live in a highly corrupt and criminal society in sedition and treason at the highest levels of government with impunity for decades. where have the legals been…? Again silence with some of them were participating in the Australia Act and other nefarious legislation against ‘We the People”

    If you go to Corporate Australia or the Kangaroo Court of Australia is not only verifies but corroborates this position

    Corporate Australia
    https://corpau.blogspot.com/

    Kangaroo Court of Australia
    Why rent a lawyer when you can buy a judge
    https://kangaroocourtofaustralia.com/

  19. Acts Interpretation Act 1901

    16 References to the Sovereign

    In any Act references to the Sovereign reigning at the time of the passing of such Act, or to the Crown, shall be construed as references to the Sovereign for the time being.

    Who for the time being is our sovereign at present? Hint – “let me issue and control a nations money and I care not who makes its laws” – Rothschild

    Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (The Lawful one)
    Constitutional and Official Definitions
    17. In any Act. unless the contrary intention appears
    (a) “The commonwealth” shall mean the commonwealth of Australia:
    (b) “Australia” includes the whole of the Commonwealth
    .
    Acts Interpretation Act of 1973 (The Corrupt one)
    Constitutional and Official Definitions
    4: (1) Section 17 of the Principal Act is amended—
    (a) by omitting paragraphs (a) and (b) and substituting the following paragraph:-
    “(a) ‘Australia’ or ‘the Commonwealth’ means the Commonwealth
    of Australia and, when used in a geographical sense, does not include an external Territory

    Can anyone offer an interpretation?

    • Why is the Australian land mass deemed to be covered by water?

      Acts Interpretation Act 1901

      15B Application of Acts in coastal sea
      Coastal sea of Australia
      (1) An Act is taken to have effect in, and in relation to, the coastal sea of Australia as if that coastal sea were part of Australia.
      (2) A reference in an Act to Australia, or to the Commonwealth, is taken to include a reference to the coastal sea of Australia.
      Coastal sea of external Territory
      (3) An Act that is in force in an external Territory is taken to have effect in, and in relation to, the coastal sea of the Territory as if that coastal sea were part of the Territory.
      (3A) A reference in an Act to all or any of the external Territories (whether or not one or more particular Territories are referred to) is taken to include a reference to the coastal sea of any Territory to which the reference relates.
      Definition
      (4) In this section, coastal sea:
      (a) in relation to Australia, means:
      (i) the territorial sea of Australia; and
      (ii) the sea on the landward side of the territorial sea of Australia and not within the limits of a State or internal Territory;
      and includes the airspace over, and the sea‑bed and subsoil beneath, any such sea; and
      (b) in relation to an external Territory, means:
      (i) the territorial sea adjacent to the Territory; and
      (ii) the sea on the landward side of the territorial sea adjacent to the Territory and not within the limits of the Territory;
      and includes the airspace over, and the sea‑bed and subsoil beneath, any such sea.

    • This illegal corporate-government entity is null and void and so are the courts.
      Causal Links to Treason and Misprision of Treason

      a) The Australia Act 1986 Section-6. Manner and Form “means Referendums” In this particular activity the Referendum had a statutory and mandatory Constitutional requirement that was omitted, formulating and enacting a concealed fraudulent Grant of Power upon the people of South Australia and the Commonwealth of Australia.

      b) The Australia Act 1986 Section-13. Amendment of Constitution of Queensland.
      Subsection (1) The Constitution Act 1867-1978 of the State of Queensland is in this section referred to as the Principal Act. In this particular activity the Referendum had a statutory and mandatory Constitutional requirement that was omitted, formulating and enacting a concealed fraudulent Grant of Power upon the people of South Australia and the Commonwealth of Australia.

      c) The Australia Act 1986 Section-14. Amendment of Constitution Act of Western Australia.
      Subsection (1) The Constitution Act 1889 in the State of Western Australia is in this section referred to as the Principle Act. In this particular activity the Referendum had a statutory and mandatory Constitutional requirement that was omitted, formulating and enacting a concealed fraudulent Grant of Power upon the people of South Australia and the Commonwealth of Australia.

      d) The Commonwealth Constitution Section-128. In this particular activity the Referendum had a statutory and mandatory Constitutional requirement that was omitted, formulating and enacting a concealed fraudulent Grant of Power upon the people of South Australia and the Commonwealth of Australia.

      e) The State of South Australia Constitution-Section-34. In this particular activity the Referendum had a statutory and mandatory Constitutional requirement that was omitted, formulating and enacting a concealed fraudulent Grant of Power upon the people of South Australia and the Commonwealth of Australia.

      f) The South Australia Australia Act (Request) Acts 1985 No. 95 – Section 51. In this particular activity the Referendum had a statutory and mandatory Constitutional requirement that was omitted, formulating and enacting a concealed fraudulent Grant of Power upon the people of South Australia and the Commonwealth of Australia.

      g) The 1999 6th November Referendum 63% said No. The Criminal Offence of Fraud. Working Against the instructions of the Australian people in that Referendum and the operation of your Fraudulent Grant of Power.

      h) Acts Amendment and Repeal (Courts and Legal Practice) Act 2003, Enacted 1st January 2004.

      Part 8 Amendments about the Crown. (61 Amendments)

      Crown x 42, Her Majesty x 7 Our Sovereign Lady Queen Elizabeth the Second, Her Heirs and Successors x 5, Council for the Crown x 4, Queen x 1, Subjects x 1. Royal Arms x 1 (Changing the Royal Arms is an act of war on the people of the Commonwealth of Australia)

      And

      By deleting “Crown” and inserting instead “State or the Commonwealth” at sections 121(4), and,123(5) and (6b) and (7). In this particular activity the Referendum had a statutory and mandatory Constitutional requirement that was omitted, formulating and enacting a concealed fraudulent Grant of Power upon the people of South Australia and the Commonwealth of Australia.

      i) The Election Writs, Senate and House of representatives, spread this Criminal Activity throughout Australia. Criminal Offence of Fraud. Referendums omitted – operating your fraudulent Grant of Power.

      j) Allegedly, the Swearing of a Foreign Oath to Freemasonry. “Conceal and Never Reveal.” The Warrant for Freemasonry came out from the United Kingdom, “Sue v Hill” Illegally declared the United Kingdom a Foreign Power, but, in so doing actually declared that the Masonic Warrant to form Masonic Lodges within Australia did make this particular Warrant, the Warrant of a Foreign Power, it breaches PART IV – Both Houses of the Parliament, Section 44 Disqualification, subsection 1 of the Commonwealth Constitution in relation to Commonwealth politicians. This Offence is to be Discovered by either a Jury trial or Grand Jury trial.

      Herbert W Briggs (of the Board of Editors) (American Society of International Law), in an article entitled DE FACTO and
      DE JURE RECOGNITION:
      THE ARANTZAZU MENDI states: “In The ARANTZAZU MENDI we find Slessor L.J.,for the Court of Appeal, quoting Bankes,
      L.J., in Luther vs Sagor, who quoted Wheaton, who quoted Montague Bernard that…
      A de jure government is one which, in the opinion of the person using the phrase ought to posses the powers or sovereignty,
      though at the time may be deprived of them. A de facto government is one which is really in possession of them, although
      the possession may be wrongful or precarious”. That explanation perfectly describes the context of ‘de-jure’ used on this website.
      De jure is by rightful entitlement. De facto is by claim; without entitlement.
      http://www.google.com.au/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=Royal+commissions+in+australia&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&gfe_rd=cr&ei=1Ew0VYrgLsuN8Qfm3YCYDg

  20. COVID-19 FOREIGN-MILITARY-OCCUPATION

    COVID-19: Is this a smoke screen for a foreign military communist NEW WORLD ORDER take over by bankrupting the whole world to bring it to its knees in order that the bankers buy it back for nothing…

  27. Cheers They are just corrupt evil criminals deep into sedition, treason, greed and a whole host of other unlawful activities

  28. Hello to everyone,
    I received this email this afternoon in reference to the Omnibus Bill currently before the Victorian Parliament, that gives powers to any person, (no qualifications needed) to arrest, INDEFINITELY anyone who MAY commit a breach of the Covid directives. They can remove anyone they so desire, children can be removed indefinitely, as well as the elderly etc. Once you have been jailed without charges, and no right to representation, how can you defend yourself? They no longer require a warrant, they can enter anywhere, and do whatever.
    This bill is urgent and I ask all to quick a quick objection, and forward on to as many people as you can.

    ——– Forwarded Message ——–
    Subject: URGENT – less than 24hrs left to object the Omnibus bill
    Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2020 03:44:36 +0000
    From: Reignite Democracy Australia admin@reignitedemocracyaustralia.com.au
    Reply-To: Reignite Democracy Australia admin@reignitedemocracyaustralia.com.au
    To:

  29. OT
    “CLARA is pleased to announce that Telstra has signed on to contribute to the CLARA consortium as efforts continue towards developing the CLARA Plan to build new regional smart cities connected to major capital cities by high speed rail (HSR).

    Telstra will play the role of consultant for ‘ICT and IOT networks, platforms and security that underpin and enable smart cities, such as that planned by CLARA.”

    https://tottnews.com/2020/10/06/telstra-joins-clara-consortium/

  30. Chelmsford revisited during covid 2020
    A defamation case of interest for those with time and some background knowledge about psychiatry and medical experiments in Australia.
    Timing significant-
    https://www.themonthly.com.au/issue/2020/september/1598882400/lane-sainty/chelmsford-revisited#mtrSEPTEMBER 2020
    ESSAYS
    Lane Sainty

    “A royal commission found in 1990 that “at least” 24 patients at Chelmsford had died from deep sleep therapy. The death certificates recorded causes such as cerebral haemorrhages and coronary occlusions, but experts testified in several cases that respiratory problems triggered by the deep sedation were the more likely culprit.”

    “Herron is 87, Gill 78, and litigation is a hell of a way to spend retirement. Herron has no money; Gill’s house is on the line. But the two men, in the twilight of their lives, are set on exoneration
    The court heard about leucotomies, lobotomies, insulin coma therapy, hysteria, treatments to turn gay people straight. Not a single witness to take the stand, other than Gill and Herron, supported deep sleep therapy as it was delivered at Chelmsford.”

    “Legally speaking, a defamation case cannot override a royal commission, or vice versa. They are judicial apples and oranges, with only a few things in common: neither can convict or exonerate, both can rewrite history.”

    More about the process-evidence

    https://estherrockett.com/2020/06/23/chelmsford-patients-give-evidence-gill-herron-v-harpercollins-cannane-defamation-trial/

    • There was a full inquiry in Canada about the DST done by Dr. Cameron. The inquiry brought up links to the ‘mind control’ experiments of the CIA. I found the entire inquiry and went through the documents and found correspondence between Cameron and Bailey. They were comparing notes on the patients.

      I had read a lot of medical reports by that time in my career, but the clinical notes were gibberish. They didn’t make sense – then I realized they were corresponding in CODE.

      This trial should get access to the documents from Canada and really hang those bastards out to dry. Forget a defamation’ trial they need some serious lengthy prison sentences.

  31. Similar to steroids, prescribed as lollies these days, electric shock therapy with largactyl and lithium has been standard procedure for treatment of depression. Oz has always been the testing ground for the freaks that control us. The movie, ‘ One flew over the cuckoo’s nest’, was tame compared to what goes on here in Sydney Melbourne and other cities, in this laboratory, by design.

  33. ANALYSIS: Trump’s “military” deployment of vaccines on Nov. 1 is a clever cover story to prepare for Insurrection Act invocation, mass arrests using military police
    https://www.newstarget.com/2020-09-13-analysis-trumps-military-deployment-of-vaccines-insurrection-act.html
    We shall see if this is true or not.
    It looks dismal for Australia with no sight in end unless there is a push back to the laws of the Commonwealth of Australia and to end this illegal corporate-government entity and to put those on trial who have been part of the sedition and treason for decades with impunity and at the present time

  34. Mary or anyone

    I always thought the Chelmsford John Herron was the same politician John Herron mentioned below. The one I knew as the Minister for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Affairs under John Howard.

    But it appears he died in February 2019.

    “Herron died on 25 February 2019, aged 86.[20] A State Funeral was held at the Cathedral of St Stephen in Brisbane on 1 March.[21]”

    If so how could it be that he is interviewed in this defamation case, as reported in the Monthly essay posted above.

    I need some enlightenment re this can anyone help.
    It is of significance and I believe on topic.

  35. Not sure where to post this but worth sharing … Given the outbreak of hostilities by Israeli/Turkish-backed terrorists in Armenia-Azerbaijan

    I do not share Sheikh Imran Hosein’s theological beliefs but he is absolutely insightful and truthful when it comes to geopolitical affairs. I have never been disappointed by his integrity.

    Azerbaijan – Armenia War! – Sheikh Imran Hosein

    this is not the first time he has ripped the Dönmeh Erdogan and the Zionist terrorist stronghold occupying Palestine apart.

  36. no opinion just sharing


    ENS
    Golden Dawn: clashes follow landmark court ruling in Athens
    Clashes between police and demonstrators continued on the streets of Athens on Tuesday after a Greek court ruled that the far-right Golden Dawn party was operating as a criminal organisation, delivering a landmark guilty verdict in a marathon five-year trial. Police had earlier used water cannon and teargas to disperse an anti-fascist rally attended by more than 15,000 people outside court Golden Dawn leader and ex-MPs found guilty in landmark trial

  37. Diane,
    The 1% have their 9% goon squads and we the people are all terrorists now.
    The banksters one world government war against all citizens of their global gulag.
    Tragic perverted justice, the military we finance are employed to murder us.

C'mon Leave a Reply, Debate and Add to the Discussion

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.