Cancer Tsunami from the RF Spectrum?

Will the Victorian government survive the financial burden of a class action suit of “the people vs the government” when evidence reveals that smart meters attribute to a possible cancer tsunami in decades to come? Smoking was never made mandatory – but smart meters were. An interesting thought. And why is Prof. Bernard Stewart, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales so coy and dismissive about the dangers of radiation – when the IARC, the International Agency on Research for Cancer – the very sub-group of the World Health Organization that sponsored the report, had classified RF (microwave) radiation and everything on the RF – EMF Spectrum a 2B or “possible human” carcinogen in May of 2011. (the IARC is the cancer agency of the WHO, and a core part of their mission is to disseminate information on cancer).

But on the Monday, February 3, 2014 in London two scientists faced a room full of reporters in the Royal Society Library’s Special Events Room on Carlton House Terrace. Two scientists distinguish themselves as authors of the thick, glossy World Cancer Report 2014 – nearly six years in the making. Co-authors Prof. Bernard Stewart, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales and Christopher Wild, PhD, Director of the World Health Organization’s (WHO) esteemed International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) prepare to tell the world we are on the verge of a cancer tsunami.

They inform us that they expect cancer rates to nearly double in the future, but they make no mention of radiation that is awash in our lives – and in some cases imposed on us. So why is Prof Stewart saying RF Spectrum is not a sufficient risk at this time to deserve a place alongside inactivity, obesity, the sun, alcohol and smoking – when the approximately 30 scientists (except one) of the IARC voted that it was a danger?

What are they not telling? For the full article go here.