Home Australia Finally … A Voice Exposing The Covid Mafia Cowards in Canberra

Finally … A Voice Exposing The Covid Mafia Cowards in Canberra

33
Senator Roberts

Introduction by Dee McLachlan

Just a quick note before going to Senator Malcolm Roberts’s address in parliament (sourced from Cairn’s News). The Covid cookie is crumbling, and the vaccine fascists are being exposed as patsies for big pharma and being responsible for the gross medical negligence that followed.

Those that advocated and pushed the “injections” will surely regret their decisions in the future. Unfortunately, some were too young to make their own choice. Santino Godoy Blanco — a four-year-old boy who had been the face of Argentina’s national vaccination campaign — passed away. (The autopsy ultimately determined that Blanco died of pneumonia, the child reportedly received several different diagnoses, including gastroenterocolitis and laryngitis.)

Senator Roberts

Hansard: As a servant to the people of Queensland and Australia, I note that at the European parliament inquiry into COVID two weeks ago, Janine Small, the President of International Developed Markets for Pfizer revealed that the Pfizer vaccine injection was never tested to see if it would prevent transmission—never tested. Small went on to say this was because Pfizer had to work at the speed of science. Well, it seems the speed of science and the velocity of money are the same thing. Shameful decisions were taken deliberately to facilitate big pharma getting their injections to market in time. The mouthpiece media have the same large investment funds on their share register as big pharma. It’s no surprise the mouthpiece media amplified the COVID scare, doubling down on fear porn and demonising anyone who clung to ‘my body, my choice’, just so the media’s shareholders could line their pockets with tens of billions of dollars in windfall profits.

I remember when the political left walked behind banners reading ‘my body, my choice’. Now real conservatives hold those banners high while the Left abuse us. How fast the Left abandon their principles when an opportunity to tell people what to do comes along, to control people. It was clear after just four months of COVID the scary Chinese videos of people dropping dead in the streets should not have been taken at face value. Measures taken out of an abundance of caution in March 2020 should have been re-examined just a few months later, as we requested and suggested. They never were. At the time, the data clearly showed COVID was no more deadly than a severe flu and well under anything the public would consider to be a pandemic. Let me support that statement.

The following data is from the Australian Bureau of Statistics published in part as a result of a One Nation document discovery a few weeks ago. In 2019, the year before COVID, the seasonal flu cost 4,126 lives. The next year, in 2020, Australia recorded 882 deaths from COVID and 2,287 deaths from the flu for a total of 3,196 deaths, 1,000 less than before COVID, almost a thousand less than the flu alone killed the previous year. In 2021, 1,137 deaths were recorded from COVID and 2,073 from the flu, for a total of 3,210. This means deaths from the flu including COVID across the first two years of the so-called pandemic were right on the long-term average of 3,255. There was nothing unusual about the Australian death rate in 2020 or 2021 yet the COVID substances—I won’t call them vaccines—the COVID injections, were given emergency approval. The only thing about our death rate in 2020 that was unusual was that it was at a seven-year low.

These are facts. This makes a joke of provisional approval granted for injections out of urgency. There was no urgency. It is not just the vaccines that were inappropriately approved; dangerous drugs like the antiviral Remdesivir were waved through using the same false urgency. Remdesivir’s side effects include respiratory failure and organ failure. The perfectly safe but out-of-patent antiviral ivermectin was banned to make way for remdesivir—banned, proven, banned. The UK has recently put ivermectin back into use. We must as well. The conclusion an increasing number of Australians are coming to is that our health technocrats tore up our tried and true health systems to shift products for their mates in the pharmaceutical industry, and now people are dying from those same products.

Once the injection rollout started, there was a spike in deaths. It must be noted correlation is not causation. The link between the cause—vaccines—and the effect—death, injury and suffering—must be proven. Well, it has now been proven beyond a shadow of a doubt. At my second COVID Under Question inquiry in August, many highly-qualified medical professionals from around the world established that link, providing evidence the injections were responsible for many more deaths than the health technocrats admit.

Late last month, the Clinical and Experimental Immunology journal published an article entitled ‘COVID-19 vaccines—an Australian review’. The authors are Conny Turni and Astrid Lefringhausen, from the University of Queensland. This article details the medical science behind the wide range of medical harms inflicted on Australians as a result of the hubris and the criminal negligence of health technocrats. I promised to hound you people down, and now science has done that for me. The issue of vaccine harm must be referred to a royal commission today. These criminals must be brought to justice. This report is reproduced on my website, and anyone who reads this report and still defends the fake vaccines is as guilty as the companies that made it.

It’s no surprise that COVID has spiked in correlation with the rollout of the fake vaccines. ABS data is not yet available for 2022, although Australian actuarial data is. In the first four months of 2022, death from all respiratory diseases—the flu, pneumonia and COVID taken together—is still at normal levels, yet deaths from cardiac and pulmonary events are up 11 per cent, and unexplained deaths are up 13 per cent. At this rate, an extra 10,000 Australians will die in 2022. Anyone reading the journal article I referred to will know exactly why this is happening. I refuse to believe our health technocrats do not know. A royal commission must ask what they knew and when.

In May 2020 I criticised fear-driven response to COVID in the Senate, within months of this mismanagement of COVID. At that time Senator Hanson and I were the lone voices of dissent in the Senate, and Craig Kelly and George Christensen were the lone voices in the other place, and Senators Rennick and Antic joined us—six representatives out of 227 people. Everyone else in both houses displayed an ignorance of proper scientific process, an inability to read empirical data and a misplaced trust of health bureaucrats. Health technocrats have spent their entire professional lives working closely with the pharmaceutical industry. And we expected them to be impartial. Come on! We delegated authority to the last people who should have been trusted with that authority.

The Senate is the house of review. Every aspect of our COVID response should have been scrutinised to the last detail. The Senate failed in that mission. COVID measures were beyond question, and it seems they still are. Rather than review, the Senate covered up. Senators Rennick and Antic, in company with myself and Senator Hanson, tried to draw out the truth and were demonised for doing so. Not one senator amongst the political Left entertained a moment’s thought that fear-driven response could be harming more people than it helped. ‘Resistance is futile’ was the message repeated at every press conference on every television in every house of parliament. New Zealand, Canada, the UK and America all joined in the circus of despair, designed to scare people into taking a substance they knew would cause serious harm and death.

Even today, vaccine mandates are still in place around Australia. The reality of a falling birth rate, unexplained increases in deaths and more than 130,000 cases of vaccine harm here in Australia is being ignored. Still, we are told the injection is safe and effective. Safe and effective is not one lie; it is two lies. The vaccine is neither safe nor effective. Medical practitioners who stood up for the rights of their patients were deregistered after action from big pharma’s enforcement arm, the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency—under the direction, it seems, of CEO Martin Fletcher and Yvette D’Ath, as chair of the Health Ministers Meeting. They’re the ones who were in control. These technocrats decided they knew what was best for patients—better than the patient’s own doctor. AHPRA must be referred to the royal commission—and the TGA, ATAGI, the Chief Medical Officer, the secretary of the federal health department and Greg Hunt, the federal health minister at the time.

The vaccine emergency use authorisation expires early next year. An inquiry into how the vaccines went would normally be conducted, but they need to stop now. The emergency authorisation needs to stop. I do not have confidence the Therapeutic Goods Administration, the TGA, and the Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation, ATAGI, will be honest and impartial in this inquiry. They have not been so far. Only a royal commission can decide all of the issues I have raised tonight. One royal commissioner will not be enough for the litany of legal and regulatory abuse, medical practice, financial malfeasance, conflict of interest, child abuse, human rights abuse and the shredding of international agreements Australia has endured for 2½ years.

The harm from our COVID response was foreseeable and preventable. If only the Senate, the ultimate house of review, had had the courage to stand up and call bullshit. The Senate did not.

The ACTING DEPUTY PRESIDENT ( Senator Chandler ): Order! Senator Roberts, that language isn’t parliamentary. I ask that you withdraw or find another word.

Senator ROBERTS: I retract that—the brown stuff.

The ACTING DEPUTY PRESIDENT: Thank you.

Senator ROBERTS: The Senate did not. As a result, the public has lost confidence in the medical profession, health administration and politicians. To his credit, member of parliament Dan Tehan publicly admitted his silence last year was wrong. This week a survey in the Daily Telegraph found that, based on the 50,000 respondents, 37 per cent of Australians who took the vaccine regret it. Only 43 per cent said they would do it again. The damage to the reputation of our once-trusted medical institutions can only be repaired with a royal commission to unravel the lies and get to the truth, and, in so doing, ensure this tyranny, this suffering and this loss of life never happens again.

I have no doubt that, when the truth comes to light, history will judge those in this place as being cowards all. We have one flag, we are one community, we are one nation, and Australians want justice.

 

SHARE

33 COMMENTS

    • Question for Dee.
      Why post such weak, misleading video when most of us know, the testing is FAKE, the disease is FAKE and the ‘experimental’ Poison Jab is REAL ?

      • If you are expecting Roberts to stand up and say that Canberra is participating in a GENOCIDAL PLAN … that I think will not be happening just yet.

        This is showing that the dam wall has leaks. But I’d be happy not to post it, but hoping Roberts gains more courage to eventually say what we are hoping for someone to say in parliament.

        Slowly slowly catch a monkey

      • Gary, just to add to this. I have been for the last four years writing to countless ministers about the rape of a child. NOT a f*** one of them has given a reasonable response and would never dare to mention this in parliament. So when one lone voice stands up and calls them out on the Cov-scam — this is something. When they go to jail, then we’ll be really writing about itl.

        • Sorry Dee, I was talking about the following video where they were talking about infection and transmition of a disease that does not exist.

  4. Only a Royal Commission can fix this, yeah, think Charles the Adulterer and then some will let you onboard.

    Worth the space Dee, kicking space.

  5. I welcome Senator Roberts candor, and courage, but the good Senator has failed in addressing the other elephant in the room – the complicity of the entire Australian Government, in what is now, and that can only be termed as, a world wide genocide that has exceeded the numbers of deaths from the Holocaust.

    It is not just the Senate that has failed us, but our entire system of government and media, the so called Fourth Estate, that has failed us all – and the good Senator only exposes parts of a corrupted and malevolent system that has been slowly working against us all ever since the time of Federation.

    He is correct about bringing to justice those who have willingly taken part in this world wide genocide, but that justice will not be sought via another corrupt system known as a Royal Commission but via the Military Court system and Nuremberg 2 Courts, to be convened around the middle of next year (2023) for Crimes against Humanity.

    Military Courts are already in effect in Guantanamo Bay, Diego Garcia and the White House.

  6. Tag: polysorbate 80 linked to infertility
    Posted on November 28, 2017
    Polysorbate 80 in Vaccines: Is it safe?

    Vaccines are loaded with ingredients that the average person doesn’t know much, if anything, about. We don’t know why any particular ingredient is needed in a vaccine, how that ingredient interacts with other vaccine ingredients, or how that ingredient will affect our bodies when it is injected. We assume that scientists who create vaccines know the answer to these important questions prior to licensing for public use. We assume our doctors have read all the scientific studies exhibiting the safety of the various vaccine ingredients prior to assuring us that any given vaccine is safe for us or our children. But, have the studies been done? Can these scientists and our doctors definitively answer these basic, yet necessary, questions about the safety of each ingredient?

    https://truthsnitch.com/tag/polysorbate-80-linked-to-infertility/

    The Polysorbate containing AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine is tolerated by polyethylene glycol (PEG) allergic patients

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34822190

    Abstract

    Background: Polyethylene glycol (PEG) is the excipient found in the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. We previously demonstrated PEG allergy was a cause of severe anaphylaxis to the Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. PEG is widely used in many household products, cosmetics and medicines. However PEG allergy is rare, there have been few confirmed cases of PEG allergy. The excipient of potential concern in the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine is polysorbate 80 (PS80). Cross-reactivity between PEG and polysorbate has been suggested, based on their composition and skin-test data. The aim of this study was to determine whether PEG-allergic patients could be vaccinated with the PS80 containing AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine.

    The excipient of potential concern in the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine is polysorbate 80 (PS80). Cross-reactivity between PEG and polysorbate has been suggested, based on their composition and skin-test data. The aim of this study was to determine whether PEG-allergic patients could be vaccinated with the PS80 containing AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine……………”

  7. The Medical Industrial Complex and the Khazarian Kontrolled Media have a severe case of ABJ disease……………………………(((Anything But the Jab)))

  8. A mandate is only a contract if voluntarily accepted

    Blacks Law Dictionary – Definition of MANDATE – It is NOT a LAW!

    Short Video Explanation:

    https://www.librti.com/page/view-video?id=1002

    Blacks Law Dictionary:

    https://thelawdictionary.org/mandate/

    “A mandate is a contract by which a lawful business is committed to the management of another, and by him undertaken to be performed gratuitously. The mandatary is bound to the exercise of slight diligence, and is responsible for gross neglect.”

    Using the term vaccine ‘mandate’ is a legal loophole to manipulate your free will to allow it to become a law.

    ‘Gratuitously’ means voluntarily.

    It’s not about ‘non-compliance’; it’s about not volunteering.

    In other words, a mandate only becomes mandatory through your own free will, by legal definition.

    They are not telling you this because they are attempting to manipulate your free will through fear.

    https://lawreview.law.miami.edu/federal-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-constitutional-issue-proper-exercise-emergency-powers/

    “According to the Congressional Research Service, there is currently no express law that allows the federal government to issue vaccine mandates to the general population. However, President Biden purports that his mandate is authorized by the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970.

    Under the Act, The Department of Labor may issue an Emergency Temporary Standard if it determines that (1) “employees are exposed to grave danger from exposure to substances or agents determined to be toxic or physically harmful or from new hazards,” and (2) “such emergency standard is necessary to protect employees from such danger.”

    When OSHA issues an Emergency Temporary Standard, it can remain in effect for up to six months without enduring the normal review and comment process of rulemaking under the Act.

    Opponents of President Biden’s recent executive order argue that states, not the federal government, are tasked with protecting public health within states. House Republicans have argued that the mandate infringes on Americans’ individual rights and oversteps the reach of the federal government’s powers.

    The Supreme Court’s interpretation of Tenth Amendment issues makes clear that congress cannot commandeer state legislatures. The Court held in New York v. United States and Printz v. United States that the federal government cannot coerce states into using their own resources to carry out federal policies.”……………………………….”

    https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/qb29d0/blacks_law_dictionary_definition_of_mandate_it_is/

    • “A mandate is only a contract if voluntarily accepted”

      That doesn’t exactly make sense.
      A contract is, of course, only morally binding if voluntarily accepted
      But the vaccine program had nothing to do with any such agreement
      It was nothing more than a con job/blackmail combo

  9. For the benefit of the future booster brigade; Dr, Chant in NSW, the msm mob and shock jokes like 2GB’s ‘Hardly et. al.
    Try the UK awakened in it’s Parliament.

    Yes we need a Royal Commission, but that would take too long and be obfuscated and a designed predetermined cover up. All RC’s are based on forgone findings!
    JUST GO STRAIGHT TO NUREMBERG AND PREPARE THE GALLOWS.⚖️⛓
    And sell the Australian BS Commission💁🏼

  11. I agree with you Ned. Straight to the Nuremberg trials. I have no faith in a Royal Commission or a Military Tribunal. Why, you may ask?

    We have a low-life ex military person presently serving as a Governor General who has done nothing for the Australian public, only grovelling to the Australian politicians and the foreign Cabal.

    When I was trying to get some justice for Martin Bryant over the false accusations of
    the Port Arthur Massacre another ex-military person at that stage Sir Michael Jeffery, another Governor General I got no answers directly from him. That was the first of several letters to him from 22 September 2005. They all appear to be putty in the hands of the Cabal.

    To finish off, good work to Malcolm Roberts and Pauline Hanson. It appears that you are representing a few politicians presently in Parliament earning their salaries, looking after the welfare of all Australians.

    • Problem in implementing such surveillance is that no one can be compelled to own a computing device re such purposes.

      As for the driver’s licence issue, more attention needs to be given to the fact that engaging with any form of licensing actually cedes State control over traveling, selling goods and services, possessing a firearm, and even teaching your own kids. The two latter instances woke me up to the fact that it’s got nothing to do with maintaining a reasonable standard of care and safety and everything to do with spiritual obeisance

      • According to biblical law, we’re free to do everything bar specific prohibitions
        According to the system of the Age everything is prohibited unless specifically allowed – no question as to doubt re where that’s headed

        • we’re all living within a system of preemptive restrictions and requirements;we’re all counted guilty till proven innocent, the ultimate Satanic reversal

C'mon Leave a Reply, Debate and Add to the Discussion

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.