Home Corona JOBS, the Acronym (Jacobson, Outlawry, Blaisdell, Self-Defense)

JOBS, the Acronym (Jacobson, Outlawry, Blaisdell, Self-Defense)

51
Justice Harlan (1833 – 1911), grandfather of a more famous Justice Harlan (1899-1971)

by Mary W Maxwell, LLB

Editor’s Note: This article appeared at RumorMillNews.com on September 22, 2020

We are in crisis. Ernst Wolff recently summed it up nicely in a September 20, 2020 article at GumshoeNews.com. A handful of people, he says, is now able to control the world economy, and this will affect you personally, soon, in very unpleasant ways.

For an attempt to overcome the extraordinary power now wielded by those few men, the participation of citizens is vital.  I personally have no talent for forming an organization, and I‘m not sure an organization would work. But I have talent for recognizing that society is the owner of the law, at least in the US.  I am certain that law is a significant challenge to the overlords. It is a weapon of well-established validity.

In this short article, I ask citizens to make use of four items in order to resist and reject the pandemic trick, with its threat of vaccination and arrest of people who protest. I have spelled each out more fully in my new book Grass Court: How To Use Law To Deal with the Pandemic.

The four things are: the US Supreme Court’s ruling in Jacobson regarding forced vax, the law of Outlawry, the Blaisdell case, and the law of Self-defense.  They can be blended to the acronym JOBS.  Please become comfortable with all of them so you can use them to counter every stupid claim that the government has authority over your body.   Let me begin with the Blaisdell case.

Home Builders v Blaisdell (1931)

The US Constitution does not say what the government (any branch) should do if there is a health emergency. Indeed the Framers in 1787 did not grant any power to Congress to deal with health – that is a state matter. Since 1976 there has been a federal law called The National Emergencies Act. Many presidents have invoked it.

Can either Congress or the president decide that all persons must be vaccinated, or that all must, say, open their homes to inspection? Certainly not. The Fourth Amendment of the Constitution says

“The Right of the People to be secure in their Persons Houses, Papers and Effects against unreasonable Searches and Seizures shall not be violated.”

Wait! That was written in 1789 and later, in 1976, Congress passed the National Emergencies Act.  Doesn’t that law mean that IN EMERGENCY, the right of a citizen to those Fourth Amendment protections has to be cut back?  Can’t Congress come up with good laws that overturn the Constitution?

The answer is: Emphatically no. Luckily, this was stated in Home Builders v Blasdell – which I refer to as “Blaisdell.” A majority ruling by the Supreme Court said:

“Emergency does not create power. Emergency does not increase granted power [wow] …. The Constitution was adopted in a period of grave emergency. Its grants of power…were not altered by emergency.”

Although that was written in 1931, it has not been overturned and so it remains as the binding precedent. You can shout it from the rooftops: “Officials today cannot override the Bill of Rights.” If they try to do so, don’t let them. Believe me, they are worried about your response – so sock it to them.

Self-Defense

If someone is about to hurt you, you have a well-established right to prevent that from happening. How could it be otherwise? Who would ever pass a law saying “Don’t shoot your attacker?” There is no such law.

Your right to preserve your own life comes first if someone else is about to kill you or deliver serious bodily injury. Similarly, you can act violently in defense of another person close by. If there is a nonviolent way to do it, that is of course preferable.

Here is an Australian High Court ruling (DPP v Zecevic), on self-defense, also known as justifiable homicide:

“The question to be asked in the end is simple. It is whether the accused believed upon reasonable grounds that it was necessary in self-defence to do what he did. If he had that belief and there were reasonable grounds for it, or if the jury is left in reasonable doubt about the matter, then he is entitled to an acquittal.”

That ruling, of 1987, is based on common law that pertains in each of the 50 states of the US.

The Vaccination Case — Jacobson v Massachusetts

In 1904, a man named Henning Jacobson violated a state law mandating vaccination for smallpox. Massachusetts had passed a law that gave the local health departments the right to determine what was needed for public health in their district. When Jacobson said No to being vaxxed, he was fined $5.00.  (comparable to more than $100.00 today).

In a very philosophical manner, the Supreme Court said:

“[Mr Jacobson’s] other eleven propositions all relate to alleged injurious or dangerous effects of vaccination. The defendant ‘offered to prove and show [by] competent’ evidence these socalled facts. Each of them, in its nature, is such that it cannot be stated as a truth, otherwise than as a matter of opinion.

“The only ‘competent evidence’ that could be presented to the court to prove these propositions was the testimony of experts, giving their opinions. [Nevertheless, the judge] would have been obliged to consider the evidence in connection with facts of common knowledge, which the court will always regard in passing upon the constitutionality of a statute.” [Emphasis added]

It is true that a court uses common knowledge – dogs bark, a child grows up to be an adult, the capital of South Australia is Adelaide. But today the dangers of vaccines are themselves common knowledge.

Justice Harlan, writing for the Court, went on to say in Jacobson:

“The authority of the state to enact this statute is to be referred to what is commonly called the police power,—a power which the state did not surrender when becoming a member of the Union under the Constitution. Although this court has refrained from any attempt to define the limits of that power, yet it has distinctly recognized the authority of a state to enact quarantine laws and ‘health laws of every description;‘ …” [Emphasis added].

That’s what we want to hear. The states, not the Executive of the US should be the deciders.

Continuing with its 1905 opinion:

“There is, of course, a sphere within which the individual may assert the supremacy of his own will, and rightfully dispute the authority of any human government … to interfere with the exercise of that will. But it is equally true that in every well-ordered society charged with the duty of conserving the safety of its members the rights of the individual in respect of his liberty may at times, under the pressure of great dangers, be subjected to such restraint, to be enforced by reasonable regulations, as the safety of the general public may demand.” [Emphasis added]

Again, this is good news. In the 2020 pandemic, the dangers have been so far unmeasurable since the test for Covid-19 is not reliable. (The Nobel Prize-winning scientist who invented the Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) proclaims that it cannot be used for diagnosis!)

Finally, the Court said that its ruling did not stand for the position that every legislative health act is beyond question:

“Before closing this opinion we deem it appropriate … to observe … that the police power of a state, whether exercised directly by the legislature, or by a local body acting under its authority, may be exerted in such circumstances, or by regulations so arbitrary and oppressive in particular cases, as to justify the interference of the courts to prevent wrong and oppression.” [Emphasis added]

 I say a new case needs to be brought soon to get a new opinion.

So far, my proposed acronym “JOBS” has been explained in terms of Jacobson, Blaisdell, and the law of Self-defense. Lastly, we turn to the law of Outlawry.

Outlawry

It’s not for nothing that the term “outlaw” was used to describe criminals in the Wild West. As there were no police officers, the thief or the murderer was outside the law. The whole situation was lawless. Therefore, the aggrieved parties had to do what was needed to counteract criminality.

The ancient law of outlawry is still in force as a part of common law — unless a state has specifically repealed it. This law makes it your duty to give the outlaw no food, no haven. You are allowed to kill him. He is “civilly dead.” To qualify, he has to be “beyond the law.” Is that not true of many people today?

Consider the case of the now-deceased Jeffrey Epstein who ran a sex trafficking business whose purpose was perhaps to get top politicians into bed with underage girls. for blackmail purposes. Everyone knew his crimes but he wasn’t arrested until 2008 — and then got a deal from the DoJ by pleading guilty to two state charges.

He got a mere 13 months in a semi-jail. At the time, the FBI had identified 36 underage victims. If you were a victim, you would have realized that this plea deal shows that Epstein was above the law – no one was willing to hold him.

I say he was an outlaw. It is hard to know at what point the public could have killed him under the Law of Outlawry. You may say “The law was working; he did get some punishment.” I say that’s lawyerese talk. Anyone can see Epstein was protected — he was invited to continue his crimes.

In a 1854 case in New South Wales, Australia — R v Elliot  — the chef justice said that it is justifiable homicide to kill an outlaw as long as the hue and cry has been raised:

“The Law of England makes every man an officer to arrest a Traitor or Felon, and all persons of Competent Age, who are present where treason or felony is committed or a dangerous wound is given, are bound to apprehend the Offender on pain of being fined and imprisoned for their neglect; they are also bound to raise Hue and Cry, and pursue him….” [Emphasis added]

My 2020 book, Grass Court, says that an amateur court (somewhat like a moot court that law students perform) could carry out a trial of any person who appears to have engaged in treason or genocide — crimes where it is structurally predictable that the miscreant will be protected.

It is up to you to make the hue and cry first. And check your state to see if it has ever explicitly repealed the law of outlawry. If it hasn’t, then the law of outlawry applies, via common law, which is the customary law that we inherited from Mother England.

Thank you, Mom.

Note: my book, “Grass Court: How To Use Law To Deal with the Pandemic,” is a free download here.

Click to access GrassCourt_2020_.pdf

 

SHARE

51 COMMENTS

  1. Law at work:

    https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-09-22/mp-anne-webster-awarded-defamation-payout-over-online-posts/12689178

    “Taking a stand

    Speaking after today’s judgment was handed down, Dr Webster said she was interested in exploring legislative changes that could lead to publishers, such as Facebook, being made more accountable for material published online.

    "It’s not an unknown world — but it is a bit of a scary world — where people can share whatever they like and it’s only by going through legal cases that things can change," she said.

    “I wasn’t so aware of the whole conspiracy theory at the time — for me, it was an issue of justice and it was to make a stand.”

    Dr Webster, a former social worker with a PhD in sociology, said she hoped that people who used social media to falsely attack others would realise that their actions were not only harmful but could have costly ramifications.”

    *** won’t someone think of the children, this could lead to free speech ****

    https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-05-14/federal-court-judge-on-vile-videos-about-nationals-mp/12248236

    “The contents of the posts cannot be reported, but Justice Michael Wheelahan said, on their face, they were “vile” and described it as “one of those exceptional cases” where the court could order the removal of alleged defamatory content before a trial.”

    on the face vile, so I will prejudge and hide this “evidence”

    Thank-you for your protection Justice, you and the Doctor should be celebrated for your stand, two bravehearts, bravo.

    Sorry if “wordy” – only a few the ignorant ones are mine ***, the rest scholarly

    In Honour of Fiona

  2. How Mussolini dealt with the Communists

    CASTOR OIL FOR THE BOLSHEVIKS.

    “In their war against Bolshevism the Crusaders of the Black Shirt
    used many weapons. One of the most effective was castor oil.
    As one youthful leader explained to me, it was not so much a
    weapon as a remedy. The Fascisti were constantly encountering
    acts of disloyalty which deserved punishment on the lower scale,
    and Signor Italo Balbo, who looks like a millitant poet, but is nevertheless
    one of the veterans of Fascismo despite his 27 years, conceived
    the idea of purging society in this simple way.

    , He had to deal with the case o a man of nearly 60, who was
    guilty of propaganda against the State. The culprit was too old
    to be beaten. Signor Balbo had him forcibly fortified with a pint of
    castor oil, administered in two large tumblers by simply stopping
    his breath unt he had to swallow or die. He was kept under restraint
    until the remedy had taken a firm hold on him and then sent
    back to his family.

    Thereafter castor oil became a sovereign remedy for ‘* Red madness.”
    It was given to all breeds of Bolsheviks, from desperadoes
    recruited from the criminal classes to schoolmasters and ” intellectuals
    ” higher up in the movement to overthrow the kingdom.

    The effect was unfailing. I am told that a ” patient ” never
    rendered himself liable to a second dose. When he emerged from
    his retirement, pale and haggard, he found himself an object of
    ridicule instead of a martyr. He was never quite the same man
    again. Fascisti would pass him by with an ironic inquirj.^ as to the
    state of his health, and Communist accomplices had difficulty in
    expressing sympathy which did not betray a suggestion of amusement.

    Ridicule thus became a powerful ally of the Crusaders of the Black
    Shirt. The psychologists at the head of the movement gauged
    exactly the mentality of their opponents, and where less subtle
    leaders might have relied mistakenly on brute force alone, they
    waged war with fine discrimination.

    https://ia801408.us.archive.org/29/items/reddragonblacksh00phil/reddragonblacksh00phil.pdf

  3. I love to see a speech by ‘Dan’ after he had been fortified with a litre of castor oil. It would make more sense and positive influence then the crap he has dumped on Victorians.

  4. Now we have increased facial recognition surveillance, e-mail, text and phone monitoring, geolocation data from smartphones and vehicles, credit card data and ad tracking information.
    These technological tools are used to track everyone in the world. Hacking and fraud are sophisticated enough for one nation to control another and with economic sanctions they are the ultimate tools – Without the mark, people are not allowed to buy and sell.

    816 have died in Australia from ‘crown’ virus, 606 in residential care.
    This is the statistical reason for Martial Law enforced.
    There are no nations anymore, just oligarchs and slaves.
    These oligarchs cannot be prosecuted by any laws or regulations!

  5. OFF TOPIC Levity

    I was just reflecting on some of my favourite movies and thought I might give some of them a re-run … 😊

    • Silence of the Dans
    • Good Dan Hunting
    • They Shoot Dans, Don’t They?
    • Clockwork Dan
    • The Dan Who Fell to Earth
    • Dan and Danner
    • Dan with the Wind
    • Last Dan in Paris
    • The Good, The Bad and the Dan
    • Saving Private Dan
    • Kill Dan (I and II)

    My real comment soon …

    • I DANICUS, the soro sstory of modern day gladiators. A rogue band of politicians fight on the road back home to Beijing .

      Dan in real life, creating a new category of autobiographical comedy.

      O Danny Boy, the rare off Broadway 15 second tutorial

        • The Dan from U.N.C.L.E.
          The Dan who shot Liberty Valance.
          The Dan Who Knew Too Much (Alfred Hitchcock film).

          On second thought, I retract the last one seeing as Dictator Dan is one dumb f@ck.

          • Meanwhile Fish, just to hand some news that will interest you and hopefully a few other readers.

            Andre Vltchek is dead – and it wasn’t from natural causes :

            https://www.veteranstoday.com/2020/09/22/vltchek-murdered/

            In the words of Dr Kevin Barrett : ‘We just lost one of the world’s greatest journalists’.

            Also from the article :

            ‘Andre Vltchek’s purpose in life was to royally piss off the people who misrule the world. Based in Lebanon, he was a scourge of the Zionist genocide perpetrators.’

            So, we don’t have to look far as to the likely culprits responsible for his demise.

            When someone is doing GENUINE journalism, exposing the malfeasance of the powers that be with info that Cuts-to-the-Bone, they’re not going to be long for this world (and/or likely to be extradited by a Zio-controlled regime where they’ll get a 175 year prison term).

            By contrast, I suspect Zio-Dave from the X22 Report is going to be with us for many moons to come.

  6. Mary, there must be a better word than ”congratulations” to express my appreciation for what you do. I will reserve the use of “congratulations” for when you have topped your class in a test or won a lemon race or an egg and spoon race. It’s something you get to keep but others are happy for you.

    I am almost halfway through the book. Not sure if I am going to be able to stand against the headlong rush of militia thugs and quote R v Elliott so ‘Self Defence’ keeps popping into mind. Nothing to lose when all is otherwise lost anyway if we don’t resist. We are all at Wounded Knee with our backs to the wall.

    These two articles came to light resonating with the same theme.

    Caitlin Johnstone – Seven Countries In Five Years: Notes From The Edge Of The Narrative Matrix

    https://caitlinjohnstone.com/2020/09/22/seven-countries-in-five-years-notes-from-the-edge-of-the-narrative-matrix/

    Caitlin takes a positive and defiant approach of contempt for these psychopaths and I particularly liked the following lines. They are about Assange but you can substitute any topic of relevance.

    There are three possibilities if you support Assange’s extradition to the United States, and only three:
    • You are a part of the power establishment Assange’s work embarrassed.
    • You are uninformed about the realities of his case.
    • You just have a severely underdeveloped conscience.

    All three can come under the banner of being a “Complicity Theorist” (anon. – borrowed)

    The second article is
    COVID World – Resist! – by Iain Davis
    https://off-guardian.org/2020/09/22/covid-world-resist/

    I thought some of the comments were really great (as always).

    Thanks for the book. You are very gifted and very generous.

  7. “The real criminals are bankers, lawyers and politicians. After draining us dry, the banksters have now taken refuge in China, to carry on with the enslavement of many for the benefit of a few. The banksters and politicians are responsible for this criminal system. A lie is a prayer for them. They lie for fun. They lie for habit. They lie for sport. They lie for profit.”
    – Anna Maria Riezinger

    • “….the banksters have now taken refuge in China……..” Mainland China definitely not, as I understand Rothschild does not own and control China’s Central Bank and Hong Kong Banking institutions have virtually lost their battle.

    • Politicians and CEOs, lies are their resumes, look at Abbott showing off with his straight faced suppository joke.
      This is where Trump is unusual, hard to guess how much he plans to deliver 2nd term.
      A few loose quotes of things Trump has said over the years, that other presidents would never have said:
      Planes could not do that, it was bombs
      Iraq was a disaster
      It’s all fake news
      Drain the swamp / lock her up
      I love wikileaks
      We never should have given all your jobs to China
      NAFTA was a disaster
      We’re going to stop these expensive, endless wars
      I met Kim Jong and we fell in love
      I have heard a lot of good things about hydroxychloroquine
      I am taking HCQ, I got it from my doctor
      The generals told me Beirut was a bomb and they should know

      Can you imagine any of that coming up on the Bush/Obama teleprompter?
      They were a pair of lying weasels, lying continuously for years about everything.
      The only good thing Bill Clinton came up with was “it’s the economy stupid”.
      The issue of whether Trump will crash the fed and implement a new (gold?) standard or whether the world money system is set to be crashed and we all get moved onto UN e-money, for me, is a total mystery. The chant or meme “all wars are banksters wars” has been around for a while. But a bank is a bank, it does money deals, it’s a bit simplistic to blame the banks for voluntary contracts that people decide to enter into. Banking actually forces some dynamism into the economy, you may have seen the bumper sticker, “I owe, I owe, it’s off to work I go”. Governments make the many rules banks are supposed to operate by.
      Dr Michael Hudson says bank managers used to do loans with a view to the success of the local economy but now they just see things purely in terms of what they can foreclose on.

      I don’t seek to be in or out of the crossfire, I’m just interested in facts, or maybe “accurate generalisations” if you prefer. The MSM will deliberately swamp us with football, entertainment etc in preference to a tidbit about the various Reserve Banks. Thus, most people know very little about it, and most are too lazy to want to know.

      • Max Keiser says the story that the Fed is buying all the junk bonds may be a lie, to get the punters and funds to “front run” and buy junk bonds thinking the Fed will take them.
        If that’s so, then the whole story may be getting legitimised by adding Trump’s name to it, and in that case “x-22 report” and others would have been totally stooged. Personally I don’t know if one or the other is the truth or if it’s somewhere in the middle.

      • Trump is big on rhetoric – but DELIVERS ON NOTHING.

        Let’s analyse some of his comments.

        ONE : ‘Iraq was a disaster’.

        SOLUTION : Provoke and intimidate nuclear superpowers like Russia and China (seeing as the ‘little war’ with Iraq which bankrupted America isn’t enough – so let’s start a HUUUGE war that will finish of the human race).
        And, for good measure, threaten and provoke war with Iran, sanction Venezuela (sanctioning is a de facto act of war).

        TWO: ‘Drain the Swamp / Lock her up’.

        RESULT: The Swamp (ie: the size of the Federal Bureaucracy and in particular the Military-Security Complex) has been enlarged to the most bloated proportions.

        As for ‘her’ being locked up, she’s free as a bird and living a life of luxury.

        THREE : ‘I love Wikileaks’.

        RESULT : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jBQ-i7ZsQUY

        Trump – the ultimate backstabber.

        HOW much more proof is needed that Trump is NEVER going to deliver on anything ?

        Most people would’ve slunk away in embarrassment with their tail between their legs and holed up in some burrow, after backing Trump on all these issues – only to see the EXACT OPPOSITE transpire during his tenure.

        Yet ‘dsw’ still has an unshakeable resolve that Trump will deliver.

        Yes Rabbi ‘dsw’, he’s delivered on YOUR Zionist agenda. ie: annexation of more Syrian territory (the West Bank) and backed Bibi Netanyahu to the hilt as the latter nukes his neighbours into submission.

        But for the overwhelming bulk of the American people themselves, for the rest of the peace loving world, Trump has delivered nothing but death, despair and economic Armageddon.

        • “……………….“Show no Mercy to a non-Jew”

          In the Middle Ages (the Rishonim era), Moses Maimonides devoted twelve years to extracting every decision and law from the Talmud of Babylon, and arranging them into fourteen systematic volumes. The work was completed in 1180 as the Mishneh Torah.

          In the Mishneh Torah, Moses Maimonides taught in “Avodat Kochavim” chapter 10, “Show no mercy to a non-Jew.”

          He gave the following example: “If we see a non-Jew being swept away or drowning in the river, we should not help him. If we see that his life is in danger, we should not save him.”

          Situation Ethics in the Killing of Christians

          Maimonides also taught that Christians should, under the proper circumstances, be killed. The “proper circumstances” are predicated on Rabbi Maimonides’ situation ethics: when Talmudists are powerfully dominant over goyim then worshippers of Jesus can be executed………….”

          https://thesaker.is/what-does-rabbinic-judaism-say-about-what-makes-jews-and-gentiles-different/

          • “When we come into our kingdom, our orators will expound great problems which have turned humanity upside down in order to bring it, at the end, under our beneficent rule. Who will ever suspect, then, that all these peoples were stage-managed by us according to a political plan which no one has so much as guessed at in the course of many centuries?” [“The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion”, end of Protocol No. 13.]

            https://www.cuttingedge.org/news/n2568.cfm

  8. “Rothschild does not own and control China’s Central Bank and Hong Kong Banking institutions have virtually lost their battle”

    Not so swift
    https://www.theswiftcodes.com/china/

    The Yuan Renminbi, which is the official currency of China, has the ISO 4217 Code of CNY. The corresponding ISO-4217 Code Number for CNY is 156

    They are all in it together, you can take it to the bank.

    All due to fail, if only we had a central system

    • “A SWIFT Code is a standard format of Bank Identifier Code (BIC) used to specify a particular bank or branch. These codes are used when transferring money between banks, particularly for international wire transfers. Banks also use these codes for exchanging messages between them…….”

      But do not indicate ownership – at least in my eyes.

      • As Mayer Rothschild famously did not say

        “Give me control of a nation’s money and I care not who makes it’s laws.”

        Its control they want, not ownership, they don’t want ownership of debt

        In a way there is already a one world currency. The monetary reset is more about, clearing the table and starting a new pyramid scam. Its a jubilee.

        Don’t believe me, start a bank, I’ll be your first customer.

        • These are the only countries left without a Central Bank owned or controlled by the Rothschild Family”

          Cuba
          North Korea
          Iran
          Syria
          Venezuela
          Russia
          Mainland China

          This is the reason why the United States is warring and placing sanctions on these nations?

          • I like you and we all contribute here. For you thoughts, in your words.

            “This is the reason why the United States is warring and placing sanctions on these nations?”

            If there was a equitable trading system, and warring was happening, who would turn up. The pot must be stocked to trade both sides of the same coin. Hence the show

        • Italians in Australia always used to use family bank to buy houses
          Most people use family bank to some extent, if you can get it up to 100% you’re free of that aspect of money anyway. Ultimately how you bank is a choice, most people prefer the bank and the e-money cards. If it is all Jews, then the Jews have showed they can deliver the best service, even better than family.
          Add inflation and house price rises, “it’s a winner”, best ponzi ever.
          As the Clintons showed with Whitewater and Glass-Steagall “GFC”, ripped off all those poor folks good and proper.

    • Interesting how they mention the industry sells off all the parts of the aborted foetuses, makes it clearer about the push for late-term abortions (start at 35:00)

    • I’m going to listen to this again tomorrow, how everything is planned in advance.
      Like freeways for example, they are on the map for decades before they are actually built.
      Australia got transformed from a “clever country” c.1970 to a one-dimensional quarry importing untold container loads of plastic novelties, over 50 years.
      Such irony that Hawke and Keating were going to make us into a clever country when the rot started under Whitlam. The well meaning voted for this and most of them are probably in Melbourne, and the majority of them seem happy to be on virus dole, until everything falls apart.

C'mon Leave a Reply, Debate and Add to the Discussion

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.