Home Trump SCOTUS’ 2024 Ruling in US V Trump – Egregious, Egregious, Egregious

SCOTUS’ 2024 Ruling in US V Trump – Egregious, Egregious, Egregious

53

(L) Justice Katanji Brown Jackson. Photo: Pepperdine University

(R) Justice Sonia Sotomayor. Photo: Constitutional Law Reporter

by Mary Maxwell, LLB, Appellant in Maxwell V Trump

I am presently a candidate in the New Hampshire Republican primary for US Senate. I believe the so-called Insurrection of Jan 6, 2021 was a psy-op, with the violence being carried out by ‘hirees,’ all in aid of collapsing the First Amendment. I believe President Trump lies persistently and that even this is a psy-op, designed to leave us feeling helpless. I am tired of the partisan name-calling and I consider the entire Congress to have failed us in recent years. I hope none of them will be returned to office I January 2027. My lawsuit, Maxwell v Trump, filed on February 20, 2026, seeks a restraining order against a ‘presidential’ war with Iran.

The 2024 Case of US v Trump

The Department of Justice (what a name!), prosecuted Donald Trump after he left office. He was charged with (1) conspiracy to defraud the United States [18 USC 371], (2) conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding [18 USC1512(k)], (3) obstruction of and attempt to obstruct an official proceeding [18 USC 1512], and (4) conspiracy against rights [USC 241.1]. All of this had to do with the former president’s allegedly pursuing fraudulent claims about the 2020 election, encouraging Vice President Pence to upset the Electoral College ballots, ordering states to “do the right thing, and finally, adding encouragement to the rioters.

It is hard to know if he committed any crimes. The Senate had passed up its chance to “try” him based on the House’s Impeachment of him. (His Party had enough votes to agree on acquittal without even debating the matter for ten minutes). And then when the Biden Administration brought the case as a prosecution, there was no trial because the US Supreme Court made the decision, to be discussed here, that it could not try Trump for crimes if they were done as part of his “core” duty.

Had I been a juror when the aforementioned charges were made, I would have said he was innocent of all of them. Indeed,at the time, 2021, I published my opinion that the rioters’ appearance on Capitol Hill had the immediate and predictable effect of ruining Trump’s chances to correct the “stolen election” – many Congresspersons were all set on Jan 6, 2021, to challenge of the Electoral ballots per the Constitution (Ah! remember the Constitution?) but the ‘emergency’ shut that down. At the time, I also published that Trump’s pressuring Georgia was quite kosher — and I’m a States’ Rights man!

The District Court denied Trump’s defense (about presidential immunity), so it went to Appeals at the DC Circuit, and then to the US Supreme Court which ruled, in 2024:

“We conclude that under our constitutional structure of separated powers, the nature of Presidential power requires that a former President have some immunity from criminal prosecution for official acts during his tenure in office. At least with respect to the President’s exercise of his core constitutional powers, this immunity must be absolute.”

I will now quote from Justice Sotomayor’s dissent (which shows how poor a job SCOTUS did) and then from Justice Jackson’s separate dissent (which emphasizes the frightening consequences). Both are of great importance. I am omitting the references but you can easily find them at https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf

JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR’s Dissent, Joined by Justices Kagan and Jackson

“Today’s decision to grant former Presidents criminal immunity reshapes the institution of the Presidency. It makes a mockery of the principle, foundational to our Constitution and system of Government, that no man is above the law. Relying on little more than its own misguided wisdom about the need for ‘bold and unhesitating action’ by the President, the Court gives former President Trump all the immunity he asked for and more. Because our Constitution does not shield a former President from answering for criminal and treasonous acts, I dissent.

… II

“The Court now confronts a question it has never had to answer in the Nation’s history: Whether a former President enjoys immunity from federal criminal prosecution. The majority thinks he should, and so it invents an atextual, ahistorical, and unjustifiable immunity that puts the President above the law.

“…the majority’s attempt to apply it to the facts expands the concept of core powers beyond any recognizable bounds. In any event, it is quickly eclipsed by the second move, which is to create expansive immunity for all ‘official act[s].’ Whether described as presumptive or absolute, under the majority’s rule, a President’s use of any official power for any purpose, even the most corrupt, is immune from prosecution. That is just as bad as it sounds, and it is baseless.

“…Under scrutiny, its arguments crumble. To start, the majority’s broad “official acts” immunity is inconsistent with text, history, and established understandings of the President’s role.

…III

“The main takeaway of today’s decision is that all of a President’s official acts, defined without regard to motive or intent, are entitled to immunity that is ‘at least . . . presumptive,’ and quite possibly ‘absolute.’ Whenever the President wields the enormous power of his office, the majority says, the criminal law (at least presumptively) cannot touch him. This official-acts immunity has ‘no firm grounding in constitutional text, history, or precedent.’ Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, (2022). Indeed, those “standard grounds for constitutional decision making,” id all point in the opposite direction. No matter how you look at it, the majority’s official-acts immunity is utterly indefensible.

A

“First, the Framers clearly knew how to provide for immunity from prosecution. They did provide a narrow immunity for legislators in the Speech or Debate Clause…. Second, some state constitutions at the time of the Framing specifically provided ‘express criminal immunities’ to sitting governors.’ If the Framers ‘had wanted to create some constitutional privilege to shield the President . . . from criminal indictment,’ they could have done so…. Third, insofar as the Constitution does speak to this question, it actually contemplates some form of criminal liability for former Presidents. … an official impeached and convicted by the Senate ‘shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment,’ —including conduct such as “Bribery,” which implicates official acts almost by definition.

B

“The historical evidence that exists on Presidential immunity from criminal prosecution cuts decisively against it. For instance, Alexander Hamilton wrote that former Presidents would be ‘liable to prosecution and punishment in the ordinary course of law.’ The Federalist No. 69, …For Hamilton, that was an important distinction between ‘the king of Great Britain,] who was ‘sacred and inviolable,’ and the ‘President of the United States,” who ‘would be amenable to personal punishment.’

“At the Constitutional Convention,…. Delegate Charles Pinckney later explained that ‘[t]he Convention which formed the Constitution well knew’ that ‘no subject had been more abused than privilege,’ and so it ‘determined to . . . limi[t] privilege to what was necessary, and no more.’ ‘No privilege . . . was intended for [the] Executive.’

“Other commentators around the time of the Founding observed that federal officials had no immunity from prosecution…. James Wilson recognized that federal officers who use their official powers to commit crimes ‘may be tried by their country; and if their criminality is established, the law will punish. A grand jury may present, a petty jury may convict, and the judges will pronounce the punishment.’

“The majority fails to recognize or grapple with the lack of historical evidence for its new immunity.

“ ‘Long settled and established practice’ may have ‘great weight in a proper in- terpretation of constitutional provisions’ (quoting The Pocket Veto Case, 1929) .

“After the Watergate tapes revealed President Nixon’s misuse of official power to obstruct the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s investigation of the Watergate burglary, President Ford pardoned Nixon. Both Ford’s pardon and Nixon’s acceptance of the pardon necessarily “rested on the understanding that the former President faced potential criminal liability.”

“Subsequent special counsel and independent counsel investigations have also operated on the assumption that the Government can criminally prosecute former Presidents for their official acts, where they violate the criminal law. See, e.g., L. Walsh, Final Report of the Independent Counsel for Iran/Contra Matters: Investigations and Prosecutions (1993).

“Indeed, Trump’s own lawyers during his second impeachment trial assured Senators that declining to impeach Trump for his conduct related to January 6 would not leave him ‘in any way above the law.’ They insisted that a former Pres- ident ‘is like any other citizen and can be tried in a court of law.’

IV. “Today’s Court, however, has replaced a presumption of equality before the law with a presumption that the President is above the law for all of his official acts.

“Quick on the heels of announcing this astonishingly broad official-acts immunity, the majority assures us that a former President can still be prosecuted for ‘unofficial acts.’ Of course he can. No one has questioned the ability to prosecute a former President for unofficial (otherwise known as private) acts…. This unremarkable proposition is no real limit on today’s decision. It does not hide the majority’s embrace of the most far-reaching view of Presidential immunity on offer.

“In fact, the majority’s dividing line between “official” and “unofficial” conduct narrows the conduct considered “unofficial” almost to a nullity. It says that whenever the President acts in a way that is ‘not manifestly or palpably beyond [his] authority,’ he is taking official action. [I believe that making war on Iran was manifestly beyond the president’s power — MM].

B

“So how does the majority get to its rule? With text, history, and established understanding all weighing against it, the majority claims just one arrow in its quiver: the balancing test in Nixon v. Fitzgerald, (1983). Yet even that test cuts against it. The majority concludes that official-acts immunity ‘is required to safeguard the inde- pendence and effective functioning of the Executive Branch.’ [Oh my.]

Compare civil actions: “In Fitzgerald, plaintiff A. Ernest Fitzgerald sued then- former President Nixon for money damages. He claimed that, while in office, Nixon had been involved in unlawfully firing him from his government job. The question for the Court was whether a former President had immunity from such a civil suit. The Court explained that it was ‘settled law that the separation-of- powers doctrine does not bar every exercise of jurisdiction over the President …a court ‘must balance the constitutional weight of the interest to be served against the dangers of intrusion on the authority and functions of the Executive Branch.’…

In light of [various] considerable protections, the majority’s fear that ‘bare allegations of malice,’ … would expose former Presidents to trial and conviction is unfounded. Bare allegations of malice would not make it out of the starting gate. …

“I am deeply troubled by the idea, inherent in the majority’s opinion, that our Nation loses something valuable when the President is forced to operate within the confines of federal criminal law.

V … VI

“…Not content simply to invent an expansive criminal immunity for former Presidents, the majority goes a dramatic and unprecedented step further. It says that acts for which the President is immune must be redacted from the narrative of even wholly private crimes committed while in office. They must play no role in proceedings regarding private criminal acts. …

VII

Today’s decision to grant former Presidents immunity for their official acts is deeply wrong. … The President of the United States is the most powerful person in the country, and possibly the world. When he uses his official powers in any way, under the majority’s reasoning, he now will be insulated from criminal prosecution. Orders the Navy’s Seal Team 6 to assassinate a political rival? Immune. Organizes a military coup to hold onto power? Immune. Takes a bribe in exchange for a pardon? Immune. Immune, immune, immune.

With fear for our democracy, I dissent.

JUSTICE JACKSON, dissenting.

“I also address what that paradigm shift means for our Nation moving forward.

I…

“To say that someone is immune from criminal prosecution is to say that, like a King, he ‘is not under the coercive power of the law,’ which ‘will not suppose him capable of committing a folly, much less a crime.’ 4 Blackstone *33. Thus, being immune is not like having a defense under the law. Rather, it means that the law does not apply to the immunized person in the first place. Conferring immunity therefore ‘create[s] a privileged class free from liability for wrongs inflicted or injuries threatened.’ Hopkins…

“It is a core tenet of our democracy that the People are the sovereign, and the Rule of Law is our first and final security. ‘[F]rom their own experience and their deep reading in history, the Founders knew that Law alone saves a society from being rent by internecine strife or ruled by mere brute power however disguised.’ United States v. Mine Workers, (1947) (Frankfurter, J., concurring in judgment).

“We have long lived with the collective understanding that ‘[d]ecency, security and liberty alike demand that government officials shall be subjected to the same rules of conduct that are commands to the citizen,’ for ‘[i]n a government of laws, existence of the government will be imperilled if it fails to observe the law scrupulously.’ Olmstead v. United States, (1928) (Brandeis, J., dissenting).

JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR has already warned of the dire consequences that are likely to follow from the majority’s decision in this case. ..

Here, I will highlight just two observations about the results that follow from this paradigm shift. First, by changing the accountability paradigm in this fashion, the Court has unilaterally altered the balance of power between the three coordinate branches of our Government as it relates to the Rule of Law, aggrandizing power in the Judiciary and the Executive, to the detriment of Congress. Second, the majority’s new Presidential accountability model undermines the constraints of the law as a deterrent for future Presidents who might otherwise abuse their power, to the detriment of us all.

“From this day forward, Presidents of tomorrow will be free to exercise the Com- mander-in-Chief powers, the foreign-affairs powers, and all the vast law enforcement powers enshrined in Article II however they please—including in ways that Congress has deemed criminal and that have potentially grave consequences for the rights and liberties of Americans.

IV

“[Because] …the risks (and power) the Court has now assumed are intolerable, unwarranted, and plainly antithetical to bedrock constitutional norms, I dissent.

Conclusion [by MM] — The 2024 ruling in US V Trump was a big fat mistake. It cannot be allowed to stand. Like the 2010 ruling in Citizens United v Federal Elections Commission, it truly destroys the Constitution. That case changed the limits on spending by Pac’s — Political Action Committee’s — to an unlimited amount. (This year alone, 2026, I have frequently read of corporations donating more than ten million dollars to a Congressional candidate.)

An easy method for changing a US Supreme Court rule is for the justices themselves to decide — sua sponte — to alter the judgment. Or, in a subsequent case, they can comment critically on their earlier choice of definition of “core powers.”

Trust me. We citizen cannot leave this precedent in place. It is very, very dangerous. I must also add that it is a real possibility that the ruling did not come from our Supreme court but was “sent down to them from above.”

I am not referring to the celestial sphere.

53 COMMENTS

  1. Seems like there is no longer even the pretense of the “separation of powers” in the “west”. There is nothing to balance here

    The immunity is the problem as it causes the corruption. We have our King and AG as the Pharaoh/Pope/Supreme Commander. They can confer immunity to any for any reason. Now i’m not wearing a lawsuit, just simplifying the issue. The system can not address this as it is corrupted beyond salvation. I hope I’m wrong and you are able to start to prosecute these horrible self believing deities.

    Maybe some swinging is required
    I am not referring to consensual non-monogamy

  2. [Cromwell]
    Happy if in the tufted brake
    The English hunter him mistake,
    Nor lay his hounds in near
    The Caledonian deer.
    But thou, the war’s and fortune’s son,
    March indefatigably on;
    And for the last effect
    Still keep thy sword erect;
    Besides the force it has to fright
    The spirits of the shady night,
    The same arts that did gain
    A pow’r, must it maintain.

    • That is the funniest link Mary that you have ever logged.
      It reminds me me of some naughty felon/s fighting in the street and a observer from across the street yelled:
      ‘DO NOT THROW HIM IN THE HORSE TROUGH’.
      I think it might have been a actual old English case. 🙀😜
      As for the rest….

      • Gene decode 25/8 Intel drop at:
        http://www.beforeitsnews.com – people powered news for those who do not want to waste their time but learn, research and think.
        For those who know Gene from say, about 25 mins, for the others, I do not care as he has been ignored here for years.
        Nothing to be heard about the information come usual pundits, bit over their paygrade to consider.
        1257
        They

  4. Digital IDs for ALL Livestock & Pets Rolling Out Worldwide
    The global food landscape is shifting under our feet, from mandatory poultry registration for a single backyard chicken to “animal passports” complete with advanced security features. A massive digital net is being cast over every independent food source on the planet. Governments are fast-tracking the digitization of livestock, and it isn’t just about “biosecurity”—it’s about knowing exactly who has the food when the grocery store shelves go dark.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPlaal_6uQI

    • As far as the article – the system appoints a dumb-ass woman to the Supreme Court that can’t define a woman because she is not a biologist (but can somehow define the words of the Constitution), hey sweetie, if you got to squat to piss you’re a woman.

      As far as Sandra’s comment, that shit only applies if you comply. If you do comply, you likely took the jab, please take another booster.

      I don’t have to worry about obtaining local meat and eggs, however, if the diesel is available I can take a lovely trip out bush (a nice vacation from the coast and the moronosphere) and knock off some roo and/or goats with my politically incorrect firearm ownership.

      I’ll probably purchase a deep freezer to go in the back of my ute. The rest of the space will be used for the all the jerky I can bring back.

  5. Digital IDs for ALL Livestock & Pets Rolling Out Worldwide
    The global food landscape is shifting under our feet, from mandatory poultry registration for a single backyard chicken to “animal passports” complete with advanced security features. A massive digital net is being cast over every independent food source on the planet. Governments are fast-tracking the digitization of livestock, and it isn’t just about “biosecurity”—it’s about knowing exactly who has the food when the grocery store shelves go dark.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPlaal_6uQI

    • Oh well, many ignored it and missed out on the list of over 20 MK ULTRA TORTURE METHODS FOM ABOUT 48 mins
      So who are the gutless bastards who do not give a stuff> SICK AS……
      Before that good frequency declassification executive order being ignored by pur sick health ministers and evil mass media
      1127

    • FIFTY THREE MINUTES TO ONE HUNDRED AND FIVE MINUTES⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰😜
      Some here like their favourite PUNDITS BUT NEVER EVEN MENTION EX LT COL RICARDO BOSI. EX ADD
      Want to know why then stop being a dumb STUPID AND USE THE MINUTES TO WAKE UP AND FORGET THE BULLSHIT.
      It is good stuff ,
      THERE IS A PLAN’, and it is obvious. The city of London and the UN are the real enemy plus WEF, et all.
      1147

    • I noted about a month ago Europe is proposing that all vehicles being built must have a camera filming the driver …… presumably when the vehicle is being driven.
      I have access now to one of the latest vehicle spy tanks, the only thing it does not tell you, is that it’s your time to poo.
      So I am keeping my 2010 commodore. It has a CD player AND SIX CYLINDERS that use petrol.
      947

    • Anyone ever heard of journalist MICHAEL HASTINGS?
      He was stirring a few pots and annoying some authorities.
      He apparently drove his Mercedes into a tree at high speed …… the engine carried on for about 30ms, from recollection to escape the inferno.
      Heck was dreaded’
      Are yes the coroner said he was on drugs as he MUST HAVE BEEN.
      But he was KNOWN ‘KIRK’ and people who knew about him think he was ‘KIRKED’’.
      Have to the love the new term for back seat driver,
      How about a seated ‘driver ‘ behind a consul bored of doing ‘triple taps’ in Iraq, behind a computer screen in Langley💁
      1011

  10. 8/26/26 WTPN SITUATION UP DATE AT:
    http://www.beforeitsnews.com people powered news to live for… first report by real Mary!
    DO NOT DIE JUST YET, hang in there.
    I mentioned the executive order Declassifying all wavelength science and reports SOON.
    Plus all hospital administrators in the US ordered to close off all patient accounts by 20/11/2
    Not sure if the med bed technology is going to fix the stupids, but if you have a in-grown toenail BE HAPPY.
    Do you still have big pharmacy’s shares?.
    222

  11. 26/8 Michael Jaco bombshell news……. [discussion]
    For legal theorists and their favourite pundits eyeing off the Iran – Ukraine fear.
    just try and discern the political underbelly and the operation that has been underway in the greatest operation in our times on this planet
    At
    http://www.beforeitsnews.com – people powered news for dumbos who have no idea of a psychological and REAL WAR OPERATING. Simultaneously..
    Give it what you want; I am not your teacher and do not care if normies and stupids have no idea.
    Visitors might realise to scrap the msm and our lazy full bellied lake Griffin pelicans.
    507

  12. Where is my 507 Jaco bombshell……… down a bit at BIN.
    BIN IS ON Fire, ignore it all, have fun just go to Nepal for a great natural msm distraction with no mention of the Ex’ order on declassifying you future medical solutions referred to above in my other comments.
    517

    • And do not mention Dolly Parton’s advertisements – to take the ‘VACCINES’. Joelene!
      At least she had a better voice than Senator Lambie’s pushy guilt advertisements.
      Or have you all forgotten?
      IT IS TIME: NEVER FORGET!
      ALL OF THEM🙈
      524

    • Oops, O’Savin is ‘107’ .
      Theories abound, eg from Cassidy that he is John John (pres kennedy’s son ?) who survived the plane crash.
      I observed that at Butler ‘he’ [disguised?] was behind Trumps’s ear and NEVER FLINCHED’ as it all happened.
      😜
      613

  15. you don’t need to click the link, you are league grade theorists now.

    https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-08-28/macquarie-island-scientists-to-be-evacuated-over-bird-flu-fears/107088108

    the link does that extra bs news thing, you know big pictures

    hey gutless scientists, you worried cartoon puff balls are going to infect you. I’m worried nobody is there to witness the real bio-weapon reason, that’s flashing red “incoming” on my “radar”

    come on people, lets get ahead of the curve, feels alot like 2019 and we smashed that outa the park(not that many, if any, listened but if we stopped just one clot shot, salute)

    • As said, if you are dying, put it off for awhile, treatment already available. Just a matter of time for civilians
      Remember.
      T ex order; release all the patents, studies and results for frequency treatment,120 days, about half the time has expired.
      All hospital administrators in the US have been ‘ordered’ to close off all patient accounts by 30/11 the administrators were called to the front desk and served.
      I wonder why our state government is annoying everyone with lack of service in public hospitals?💁🙀🤷‍♂️
      Hang in there?
      244

  16. Dark Journalist X-234: Joseph Farrell Part One: Project Rainbow Tesla UFO File Secret Revealed- August 21, 2026
    Topics: Unified Field – Philadelphia Experiment – UFO File
    Dark Journalist and Dr. Joseph Farrell go deep in this X Series Episode 234 as they reveal that the newly announced Headquarters for the Golden Dome Missile Defense Program by the Trump Administration is in the same Naval shipyard where the legendary Philadelphia Experiment was conducted! The secret Unified Field experiment that achieved invisibility using Tesla Technology and Torsion Physics happened in 1943. That was the same year that MIT Professor John Trump, President Trump’s Uncle seized Nikola Tesla’s papers.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BSu-pLaEUJM

      • Pity the normies here do not follow real Mary at WTPN SITUATION UPD AND WONDER WHAT IS REPORTED AS TO WHAT HAS HAPPENED AT PINE GAP..
        The all fiscal stuff is not for me, I know sfa., but the med bed stuff is hopeful.
        Have to love ‘CULTISTS’ Sandra.
        937

        • Listen to all of it.
          I do not care, I passed out tv room to a fascinated watcher of a program on historic aliens being here at least 17 thousand years ago.
          All I could comment: as I passed through, you are at least 60
          Years behind what I know. How about NOW?
          1011

          • Julius and caltrop et.al., trust that you are learning something from your tv.? Note the conditioning💁🙀😜
            There are shocks afoot.
            1017

  18. INTEL Roundtable w/ Johnson & Kwiatkowski – Weekly Wrap 28-August
    Judge Napolitano – Judging Freedom
    CIA Ratcliffe flew in an unmarked US Globemaster C17 transport to Moscow to retrieve Americans KIA.
    Scott Bessent manipulating stable coin market to profit Trump family.
    The Mecca pact.
    EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY
    CANADIAN GEESE
    are now called
    DONALD DUCKS
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CCJV2zU8LG4

    • Interesting ‘wrap up’. I presume.
      Now try this one too.
      Great news for our fence post turtles.
      ‘’JUDY BYINGTON, 107’ Charlie Ward 8:29:26 TRUMP ACTIVATES EMERGENCY POWERS ………’
      People powered news only For those who like fun and think ‘the BIDEN WAS REAL🙈😜😜😜🙈
      http://www.beforeitsnews.com
      HAVE FUN.
      657

    • HEAPS MORE FUN FROM JB ON THOSE KILLING BABIES IN SATANIC RIGHTS:
      ‘Just below the real Mary report above at Beforeitsnews.com see link above!
      ‘JUDY BYINGTON BOMBSHELL REPORT T … CANADIAN RESIDENTIAL SCHOOLS KILLING BABIES LOCAL SATANIC COVERNS ACTIVE’.
      Nothin much new here, most of us WHO CARR HAVE BEEN ON TO THIS FOR DECADES, even for centuries.
      BUT I HAVE ONLY NOTED A FEW CARING, particularly Diane De-Vere.
      Seem that the normies and those turtles must have some reason for ignoring the years of references here
      PARTICULARLY THE ARDRENOCHROME REPORTS for years by me🤷‍♂️
      717
      Oh well, it is all on record. FOR HEAPS OF ‘FUN’.

      • adenochrome is a thing but its not just under cover and obvious. Question is where does all the “raw material” come from,

        Doctor Joanna Howe, another Adelaide Uni outsider, and awesome like our Mary
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u2xrn5PepLQ

        if a fetus can bootstrap, well you have a baby and trauma causing adrenaline production for these hidden satanists is traded.

  19. Palantir Inside the NDIS, ICAC Amnesia and the Private Credit Crash | Scam of the Week
    The West Report
    Palantir’s software now sits inside 25 Australian government agencies, the NDIS among them. It’s the same Gotham system the IDF used in Gaza, and the mainstream press hasn’t written a word about it. Michael West also has Michaelia Cash demanding to know what Albanese is hiding from the Bondi Royal Commission without ever saying what she thinks it is, the ABC’s interview with the Israeli officer who ordered the strike on three marked World Central Kitchen vehicles and isn’t sorry, and the $900 million Australia has handed Elbit.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vAjXHrOV2Y8

  21. FOR VISITORS who believe in the source of all (GOD!) .most of our usuals have been IGNORING GENE DECODE FOR YEARS. And just stuck in their conditions paradigms. At:
    http://www.beforeitsnews.com – people powered news.
    G decode a story big Intel a most dangerous game’ 29/8/26
    1207

    • Well that was ‘enlightenting for those who were game and. Pulse be bothered. Sandra, perhaps you can shorten you horror from about 114 mins for a few and note the references to Derek Johnson, JMc who often has Bosi on and note that your evil Trump has rarely been seen since about 2018 as the fake one parades on central stage.
      For the visitors, some commentators for their own reasons apparently IGNORE ANY REFERENCES TO ANYONE OTHER THAN THEIR AGREEABLE PUNDITS, and ‘Law of war manual’ is a forbidden understanding for some reason, like realising that the Biden was not the real Biden.
      HEAPS OF CROM THE START😜
      217

  22. Ever heard of Israel’s HANNIBAL DECLARATION/DOCTRINE.
    Try redacted news with Natalie Morrison and the interview where there is a study of it applied by Israel and the consequences.
    Seems that the October 7 Israeli situation room meeting was videoed for a period without permission, when the ‘doctrine’ in other terms was proposed.
    Seems that the media would not know of it let alone report it as applied.
    Sandra, there is a practical reason for the application. Never let hostages be taken: causes too much annoying leverage by the captors later to negotiate release of prisoners.
    Hannibal was a real Leader, it seems.
    Wonder what happened to the elephants?
    431

  23. Want to watch tv tonight or put up another program for hour or so to do some research.
    I am up to a bout 20 mins and finish off later.
    But you cane get an idea from John Michael Chambers on what to expect.
    Well gee wiz Sandra is going to have Derek Johnson up on The ‘COG’ and the music industry… ( the fellow you probably have never listened to, but you are not alone) he sings etc and know a bit about the industry. Dollly Parton is to come up, the midterm elections.
    military rule and all fun for you and the visitors.
    JMC IS ALWAYS GOOD TO LISTEN TO. I forgot, it is the fellow Gene Decode mentioned,,as well as JMC is respected. Brian Ardus and Dr ……. penny might be of interested for the injected. Seems that they have a program to publish ALL THE AFFECTS OF ALL INJECTIONS… to show your dumb injector. Fancy, a parent telling a doctor. Perhaps one can bill the doctor for the information that the ‘doctor’ is too lazy to research and be able to advise.
    Seems the government have never thought of the idea.
    607

    • Completely off topic but one at times reflects and this curiosity came to mind.
      In regard Tom Evil human identities who carry out evil things. Eg with child proven sacrifices.
      We know that the general attitude is the ‘millstone solution’ and ending.
      We may have heard Gene decode opine that such entities, have a soul but deny it, then their energetic existence as a soul is dissipated in the universe and they no longer exist in oneness.
      So is there any chance for those souls?
      Well I do not know.
      But I am reminded of the crucifying of Christ on the cross.
      I have not thought of this for about 70 years but it comes, as reported, now.
      Christ allegedly, by some, was crucified nearby with two alleged Criminals.
      One denied Christ but the other recognised him and was forgiven and promised to join Christ.
      Perhaps our bible believers of the New Testament might opine as it may reflect for some in current times?
      Just a thought!
      911

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.