Dee wanted to do a short 10 minute video that people would be inclined to watch. I also prepared a rough draft screenplay for her to work from to understand the evidence. Not surprisingly, nobody wants to touch a longer full length movie – they are way too scared to take on such a project.
The draft screenplay does help to explain the evidence in a story form and the dialogue helps fill in some facts. Here’s a one of the scenes.
SCENE OF EMILY WITH HER RETIRED CONFIDANT
Emily is having lunch with a friend who worked in Special Forces and Intelligence, he’s older man that looks weathered – Emily: “What did you think of the information I sent you? Do you have any ideas about this guy that did the killing?” John pushes the manila envelope back to Emily. John: “The shooter was a pro alright, I’m good but not that good. He was so good that it boggles the mind that people haven’t caught on. The first thing I noticed was he shot from the hip, that is difficult, the movies make it look easy, but that’s because they want to film the actor’s faces, can’t do that when the actor is looking down the barrel.” Emily: “How much practice would it take to be able to shoot from the hip?” John: “More than I wanted to do, let alone waste that much ammo trying to get good.”
John opens his left hand and continues “Bryant also shot from the left side, this guy shot from the right, looks like they couldn’t find a left-handed shooter or maybe they didn’t know how Bryant shot, or that people wouldn’t notice, whatever, it was a big screw-up” Emily: “He was a very good shot, 19 of the 20 people in the Café were hit in the head.” John: “Head, neck, same thing, it is a CNS shot, a central nervous system hit. You can shoot a man through the heart and even if the blood flow stops immediately he still has enough oxygen in his brain for another 10 seconds, maybe more. That’s a long time to deal with someone that is really pissed off. A CNS shot is immediate incapacity. That was the result this guy was aiming at, he wanted those people to go down quick without any issues. Bryant wouldn’t know that, this guy was experienced, not Bryant.”
John continues “There were plenty of other things I noticed. The shooter stopped at 29 rounds and changed magazines. That is a trick where you put a tracer in the next to the last round in the magazine. When you see the tracer, you drop the empty mag and put in a fresh one. The last round from the previous magazine is already chambered and you don’t have to remove your hand from the trigger to recycle the action. They should have put the tracer in the 26th or 27th position, that way there would have been a few rounds left in the magazine. By doing it military style, they gave the game away.”
“Then there is the way the guy did a classic ambush technique of burning a magazine and then putting in a fresh one to use while he withdraws. I’d say this guy has done similar things before. Then there is his attempt to kidnap the woman.” Emily: “Mrs. Mikac?” John: “Yeah, he told her to get down on her knees. That is a common technique for taking a prisoner. He told her three times to get down on her knees – on your knees, on your knees, on your knees.” Emily: “Why did he kill her?” John: “Probably the little girls complicated things, so he killed them all. I figure the script they were working from required him to take a female hostage. First Mikac, then the toll booth argument and finally at the General Store. Each time he was going for a woman. I think he finally gave up when the woman at the store refused to get out of the car and the boyfriend volunteered. So he took the boyfriend and killed the woman. He also didn’t put the SLR down at the tollbooth, he kept it up and at the ready with his right hand and pulled the bodies out with his left hand. Most people would put down the gun to move the bodies, not this guy. He was an experienced killer, most likely former military.”
John tapping the envelope John: “I also noticed that Paul Mullen gave the psychiatric report – that is a big red flag nowadays.” Emily: “Why, who is he?” John: “He’s the go-to boy for a cover-up. He interviewed Julian Knight of the Hoddle Street massacre, and he just happened to be living in Aramoana, New Zealand when they had the massacre there and interviewed Gray. The big give away was when he was appointed the Court psychiatrist in the Chemlsford Royal Commission.” John smiling. Emily: “I don’t understand” John: “Chelmsford was a place for doing mind control experiments in Australia. The CIA had moved the MK ULTRA experiments out of the U.S. and into Canada and Australia. Dr. Bailey at Chelmsford was in contact with Dr. Cameron in Canada and they were comparing notes. They killed 24 people at Chelmsford trying to mess with those people’s minds. The Royal Commission was a white wash that attributed the deaths to medical negligence, but what they were doing was intentional, they were using the people like lab rats. Mullen was appointed the Court psychiatrist to make sure the Royal Commission avoided the mind control links.” Emily: “This is freaking me out.” John: “Wait until you get as old as me, nothing will surprise you anymore.”
Emily: “Any ideas who is behind this? John: “It’s international, but I can give you one name. Ever hear of George Soros?” Emily: “Yes, I thought he was just a big time investor.” John: “He’s into a lot of things with his NGOs, that’s Non-Government Organisations. See if you can get access to the financial records of The Coalition for Gun Control. The head of the Coalition is a woman named Rebecca Peters, she’s on Soros bankroll through his Open Society. I expect you will start connecting dots back to Soros and his NGOs.” Emily: “It was Roland Browne of the Coalition for Gun Control that said ‘We are going to have a massacre in Tasmania like those elsewhere’”
John: “Yes, I remember what he said, (smiling) he must be a prophet (sarcasm). – The Attorney General, Daryl Williams, was also financing the Coalition for Gun Control, he gave them $80,000 of public money and got caught. He’s also the Patron for the Western Australian branch of the Coalition.”
John continuing: “The Coalition for Gun Control isn’t the only NGO involved. Take a look at the AIC, the Australian Institute of Criminology. They’re the government body that has come up with all the phoney gun control figures.” Emily: “What phoney figures?” John: “Everything they’ve been saying is a lie. They said that 700 people are killed by guns each year in Australia, the truth is it is around 80. They had to pad the statistics, so they added in firearm suicides, which are around 450.” Emily: “That still doesn’t add up to 700.” John: “Like I said, they lie, they just grabbed a few hundred more out of thin air – 700 people killed by guns. – What do you think is the highest form of homicide is?” Emily: “Guns?” John: “Nope, it is assault, kicking, stomping, clubbing your fellow citizens to death. The second highest is knives. Guns rank third. Even if you take away all the guns, you will still have the intent to kill and people find their ways.” Emily: “I had no idea about any of that.” John: “Of course not, you have to get your information from legitimate sources. Here’s one that the AIC will never publish. The homicide rate through the 20th Century is fairly consistent year after year, except for one period where the rate dropped significantly. Care to take a guess when that was?” Emily: “I have no idea.” John: “It was during WWII when virtually every man and his dog was walking around with a firearm.” John laughs, “The BS coming out of the AIC is so deep you need gum boots to wade through it.”
Emily: “Is the AIC a Soros NGO?” John: “It might as well be. The Director of the AIC is a bloke named Duncan Chappell (John places his right hand down) he was also the Chairman of the NCV, the National Committee against Violence (John places his left hand down), which was the organisation that gave the AIC the desired recommendations for the gun laws. Go back one more step (John moves his right hand over to the other side of his left hand) and you get to the United Nations and Soros with his UNICRI. They were the ones directing the NCV. – It is like a shell game, they use multiple bodies to create the illusion of independent organisations when it is really being directed from a single source. (John leap frogs his right hand onto the left hand, then places the right hand down again.) “Then when Chappell leaves the AIC, he goes to work for his mates at UNICRI” (John moves his right hand back over to the other side of the left hand). John smiles “The pea is under all the shells – and none.” (John turns his hands over to show they’re empty)
Emily: “Thanks for looking at this, is there anything else?” John: “Yeah, be careful – and thanks for the lunch.”
This was sent to me by a friend of mine after I have been sending information on.
21 DEC 2015
TO:
TASMANIA BARRISTERS
THE TASMANIAN BAR
Andrew James Abbott SC, William Ayliffe, Greg Barns, Kim Laura Baumeler, Raymond J. Broomhall, Aneita Browning, Bernard Cairns, Dan Coombes, Tom Cox, Kate Cuthbertson, Matthew Goldberg, Caroline Graves, Philip John Gray, Bill Griffiths, Chris Gunson, Craig Hobbs, Philip Jackson, Todd Kovacic, Joseph Lee, Bruce McTaggert, Aziz Gregory Melick, David Mitchell, Kate Mooney, Michael O’Farrell SC, Garth O’Rafferty, Keyan A.M. Pitt QC, David Porter QC, Ken Read SC, Mark Rinaldi, Mary Anne Ryan, Cameron Scott, Julian P. Siggins, Rodney J. Skiller, Ken Stanton, Garth Stevens, Charles Sweeney QC, Sandra Taglieri, Philip Theobald, Andrew Walker, Jennifer Mary White, Andrew Wood, Justin Zeeman, Phillip Zeeman. (43)
On 22 and 27 NOV 2015, you were sent emails related to the wrongful imprisonment of innocent Martin Bryant. (copies available to all readers on request) My email to you of the 22nd ends with these words:
“If no written statement declaring that Martin Bryant has NOT had his legal rights fulfilled is made public by you, by 20 December 2015, then the only conclusion can be is that the Barristers of Tasmania are wilfully corrupt like the Tasmanian State which is responsible for the official killing at Port Arthur in April 1996. (see MASS MURDER and THE WORST OF BRITISH JUSTICE) That conclusion together with your names (and images?) will be distributed internationally and no doubt it will be websited on the Internet. You are involved with Martin Bryant – you cannot wash your hands of his coercion, conviction, incarceration, torture, and impending death. Again, you are reminded that you are all officers of the supreme court of Tasmania. Your ethical responsibilities are not dependent on whether you receive financial payment.”
But, no written statement has been made public by you. So it is concluded:
You – OFFICERS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA – are wilfully corrupt; and,
You – OFFICERS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA – cannot wash your hands of his coercion, conviction, incarceration, torture, and impending death of innocent Martin Bryant now incarcerated in Tasmania for the term of his natural life.
You were sent an email (22 NOV 2015) from your barristerial colleague Paul Mason, now in Brisbane. He states this: “Although I am no longer a member of the Tasmanian Bar, it would disturb me if all avenues judicial, administrative and political were not pursued to enable Mr. Bryant’s removal from lifelong solitary confinement and rehabilitation in custody or even application for eventual release…. Solitary confinement is inherently a torture….” (thank you Paul Mason)
Of course torture is not the whole story. You know this. The mentally-handicapped Martin Bryant is incarcerated for life but he has never had a trial. NO TRIAL!!! The entire legal system in Tasmania was turned on its head – NO coronial inquest, NO credible public inquiry, NO royal commission, NO trial – to ensure innocent Martin can never speak to the public. Your legal colleagues – mongrels* John Avery, Damian Bugg, and William Cox – put Martin in prison. (* Australian slang for a despicable person)
All of you, officers of the supreme court of Tasmania, have allowed this, and continue to allow it, and, it seems, will continue to allow it until innocent Martin Bryant is DEAD! What gutless mongrels you are. You, with your sharp Salamanca addresses and stunning sandstone offices. You don’t give a damn for that “caged circus animal” (Gary Ramage; photographer, News Corp Australia). You concur with the following: “Burn in hell”; “Burn him alive”; “Filthy fat scum”; “Firing squad practice sessions”; “Give him a bullet”; “…he should have got the firing squad scum bag animal”; “…one of the inmates should knock him”; “This pos sucks dicks to get chocolate”; “Injection soon”; “Kill him”; Etc. (SUBMISSION DOCUMENT TO AUSTRALIAN PRESS COUNCIL: News Corp Australia Articles Inciting Hatred & Killing) You concur with these cruel words and the fact that the Australian Press Council refuses to take action against News Corp Australia from publishing articles which incite hatred and killing. It is noted that not one of you have spoken out about this. (Please correct me if I am wrong.)
Over 70 years ago on 1 NOV 1945, Australia became an official member of the United Nations. Within, its Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 11(1) reads as follows: “Everyone charged with a penal offence has the right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty according to law in a public trial at which he has had all the guarantees necessary for his defence.” But you have, to date, ensured that innocent Martin Bryant is incarcerated without any proper legal defence and without a trial. This is undeniable. But you and your sophistry (barristerial bullshit) will probably argue some exclusionary reason which denies Martin Bryant his inalienable human rights. The literature is devoid of any legal concerns or defence raised on Martin’s behalf which has arisen from you the barristers of Tasmania. You turned away as this boy-man was set up, demonized with false words and manipulated images, coerced, convicted, then incarcerated where he is now being slowly tortured to death. Your abject and appalling nonfeasance makes all of you GUTLESS MONGRELS. This is undeniable too.
So now things will move ahead. Twenty years of wrongful imprisonment are up in APR 2016. If someone (official or unofficial) does not “knock him” before this date, innocent Martin Bryant and the official killing (APR 1996) at Port Arthur will be made subjects of household conversations throughout Australia. And right in the middle of this, it is our (decent people in and out of Australia) intention to ensure that you, the GUTLESS MONGREL BARRISTERS OF TASMANIA, are mentioned.
In the beautiful Apple Isle, you approved Martin’s imprisonment with NO TRIAL. You approve of his ongoing torture. You approve of him being put in a cage to be photographed with the images being displayed in newspapers and on newspaper websites around the world. You approve of the living hell his dear mother and sister are being put through – day after day for nearly 20 years. And you do not care if the families, relatives, and friends of all the Port Arthur Massacre victims have been lied to and NOT served justice. All of you are complicit right up to your ridiculous horsehair wigs.
Continuation from my friend
image001.png Cameron SCOTT
“Cameron was educated at the University of Tasmania, upon graduation he commenced working as a criminal lawyer in Melbourne’s Western suburbs. Cameron later moved into the Melbourne CBD where he practised as both a criminal and family lawyer. Cameron has returned to Tasmania where he has established himself as a barrister.” (http://www.tasmanianbar.com.au/)
Cameron, you must have been right there in Tasmania when the Port Arthur Massacre was officially perpetrated. Has it not bothered you – not even once? – that Martin Bryant had NO TRIAL? What kind of legal enlightenment was bestowed on you at that University of Tasmania? Innocent until proven guilty is a foundational principle of your profession.
Don’t tell me Chester Porter QC is full of bull when he states: “The fundamental basis of liberty in the common law of England and Australia is the presumption of innocence. Thus any person accused of a crime is presumed to be innocent until his or her guilt is proved beyond reasonable doubt in a court of law.” (The Conviction of the Innocent: How the Law Can Let Us Down; 2007: p.1). Don’t tell me the guilty plea forced down Martin’s throat by that criminal of a lawyer John Avery permitted your legal system to dismiss every right Martin had. To treat him as an Untermensch. Quoting Chester Porter QC again: “If a person has an IQ of seventy, it is not difficult…to persuade him or her to confess to almost anything.” (p.19) Martin had an even lower IQ of 66 and he lived his life at a school-grade 6 level. It was easy for your mongrel mates John Avery, Damian Bugg, and William Cox to kick his guts in then send him to Risdon Prison – forever. It is the worst contrived injustice in the history of Australia.
So Cameron, you say you studied and practiced criminal law. So then do the right thing for innocent Martin Bryant. But if however you don’t like what I have just written, go and tell your own family that Martin Bryant had the best of British justice. Tell them his legal-aid lawyer was truly brilliant. Tell your family that even though Martin never had a trial, he is truly guilty of killing 35 people and wounding 23 others at seven crime scenes – all on his own. Tell them he arranged for the 22-body refrigerated mortuary vehicle and the special embalming equipment – all on his own. Tell them he held off a highly-armed and trained police assault group overnight – all on his own. And while he did so he made snacks, used the toilet, and had dozens of scripted phone conversations with the police negotiator while using firearms he never owned and which inexplicably were damaged just before he set himself alight then calmly waited inside Seascape Cottage until he had some 3rd-degree burns on his back. Tell your family that he is guilty because everyone knows he did it. And tell your family that Pope Francis is an absolute jackass for saying: “Life imprisonment is a hidden death penalty.” (http://www.cruxnow.com/life/2014/10/23/pope-francis-blasts-supermax-prisons-as-torture/) Cameron – tell them whatever you like. But then look at yourself in a mirror, with or without your wig. What will you see? A man or a mouse?
All your names, and the available images as per the listing on the Tasmanian BAR website, will be used as deemed appropriate to convey to the world how complicit and corrupt you barristers really are. If you don’t like this, take me on in the court of public opinion.
A pdf copy of LEAKED DOCUMENTS will be emailed to you separately. None of you requested a copy, which is most telling. It’s free, you’ll like that. Read what witnesses reveal in their statements. Have no doubt that most of you will try and make their words inculpatory so you can wash your hands of this evil matter. But just like the mongrels Avery, Bugg, and Cox, you won’t be able to. You are marred by guilt, and guilt grows. Your legal system in Tasmania is complicit and corrupt to the core when it comes to the Port Arthur Massacre and the wrongful imprisonment of innocent Martin Bryant.
Read what the State does not want the public to know. Get some courage (not more piss into you down at the barristers’ bar), stand up, and speak out for a mentally-handicapped boy-man who is now being officially tortured to death à la Guantánamonot far from you. His family lives in hell. And all the families, relatives, and friends of the Port Arthur Massacre victims have NOT been served justice. This must end.
STAND UP AND SPEAK OUT – FOR TRUTH! FOR JUSTICE!
Sincerely,
Dr. Keith Allan Noble; author
Unit 72 B, Am Heumarkt 7
1030 Vienna, Austria
t. 43-1-9712401
copies distributed internationally
related releases:
REWARD (A$20,000)
Replication of Images Inciting Hatred & Killing
Published by News Corp Australia
2015 NOV 22
poster & conditions: murder.research@gmail.com
LEAKED DOCUMENTS:
Statements of Port Arthur Massacre Witnesses
leaked from DPP Office, Hobart, Tasmania
2015; 122 pp.
free pdfs: murder.research@gmail.com
SUBMISSION DOCUMENT TO AUSTRALIAN PRESS COUNCIL:
News Corp Australia Articles Inciting Hatred & Killing
2015 SEP 22; 21 pp.
free pdfs: murder.research@gmail.com
THE WORST OF BRITISH JUSTICE:
Readings Related to Injustice in Australia
(66 Readings; 80 Inserts; 100 authors)
2015; 2nd edition; 796 pp.
free pdfs: BIGWORMBOOKS@gmx.net
paperbacks: bookfinder.com
MASS MURDER:
Official Killing in Tasmania, Australia
2014; 2nd edition; 696 pp.
free pdfs: BIGWORMBOOKS@gmx.net
paperbacks: bookfinder.com
These 8 sentences below explain it all especially after 30 years!
“Australian Government Is Officially Illegal”
“The recent attempts by the Tasmania State Government to amend Laws to ensure validity was a poor effort to hide the facts and legal errors of the past, but more important it shows something is not right!”
“In April 2015, the Tasmania GOVERNMENT oversight has cast a question mark over the appointment of the state’s magistrates, coroners and justices of the peace. In fact, this oversight applies to all state’s of Australia.”
“Under the 1869 Promissory Oaths Act, all magistrates, coroners and justices of the peace are required to take the judicial oath tendered by the Clerk of the Executive Council and taken in the presence of the Governor or the Chief Justice or another judge of the Supreme Court.:
That originally was for the respect of office and to testify by an eye witness of high authority that has been blatantly ignored in my opinion.
“The requirement has not been followed for 30 years. Why hasn’t it? Who stopped it? Did no one question the stoppage? Many questions after 30 years of insubordination is my opinion. I would love to hear the excuses after 3 decades! Malfeasance in Office is another charge against them as well
“”Valid Law and Government Does Not Exist In Australia, and has been noted in the UK Parliament and at the UN.”
A group of us have been fully aware of this “Concealed Colony” business for decades… it could be more.
Then we have sedition, treason and spying:
Aussie Government collusion
According to this presenter, ex Pm Malcom Turnbull, Julie Bishop, Alexander Downer and George Brandis is going to be indicted shortly for their part of attempting to overthrow a duly elected president of a foreign country and colluding with another country to do so the UK.
1st Comment
I have seen three Youtube videos mentioning Alexander Downer and also how Australia and the UK illegally spied on President Elect Trump and how they continued to spy on him after he was elected President. Both governments then went through diplomatic channels to keep this secret from both countries. I think the Whittaker is the name you wanted. as AG. They have had to cleanse the Department of Justice and the FBI of criminal elements at the highest level prior to getting Judge Kavanaugh in office. Then they can commence the military tribunals against these traitors, murderers, pedophiles, blackmailing and bribing, sedition etc. As ex Prime Minister Turnbull was in office at the time and President Trump, Q and others were quite angry about this illegal spying between allies. The Americans have done it in the past as well. So the Gang of Four or more Malcolm Turnbull, Julie Bishop the Minster for Foreign Affairs, George Brandis the High Commissioner to the UK and Alexander Downer who was the High commissioner in London. I would add the insidious criminal CIA who have most certainly infiltrated the Australian intelligence services which is quite obvious in a number of areas. This is High Treason of helping a foreign government to oust a democratically elected President of another country. If this is so, I hope all get properly indicted and charged with stiff jail terms and fined heavy penalties.
An excellent speech by Andrew Wilkie in which no other politicians will mention! It is such pity that there are only a handful of people in the chamber! What does that tell us? Australians need to wake up and take notice!
I have said ever since 9/11, in which it was never open to debate, discussion or dialogue about who was actually behind that audacious event to create series of perpetual false flag wars for the Fascist US and for the evil Zionist Israeli regime.
Parliament can’t even debate on issues let alone vote of them! That is certainly not a democratic principle. The Westminster system is undemocratic and there are far too many Executive decisions being made without judicial and legislative oversight with the proper checks and balances.
AUSSIE TREASON
Aussie Treason Part 2
Aussie Collusion
Australian Government Acts of Treason 1/4
It has been said over and over without any effort before Aussie Treason Part 1 & 2 just recently a few months
So obviously something is very very wrong and everyone is just going along fine minding their own business with all of the above going on! Amazing to me!
Thank you for this work Dee, Terry et al- yes the evidence is certainly there. I found this account of events today, of particular interest to me, the media watch report.
So you have both political parties and others supporting the signature of a Communist UN in finance, support and ambassadors.
http://www.hiddenmysteries.org/conspiracy/conspiracy/parthur2.html All this action by the Tasmania Police was as per the SOG manual, prepared by SAC-PAV, the Federal based body that controls the Police SOGs, in the SAC-PAV ‘Anti-Terrorist Plan’ that had been implemented in November 1995. Now the SAC-PAV has control of the various State Police SOG bodies, but not only that, they also have trained other members of the police, such as the Police Media Liaison Officers. However, what is of real interest is the fact that the SAC-PAV is run by the ‘Protective Security Co-ordination Centre’, the PSCC, which is an intelligence body operating out of both the Federal Attorney General’s Department and the Justice Department. It has also been recorded that the Police Special Branches were also being run by the PSCC.
We have been informed by ‘A Current Affair’ that the three top Tasmania Policemen, McCreadie, Prins and Bennett are all SAC-PAV trained. So was their Media Liaison Officer, Geoff Easton who prior to his appointment with the Tasmania Police was a Communications Officer at Canberra. Another Media Officer was Peter Hazelwood, who has connections with the Hilton Hotel Bombing back in 1978. It was this event that initiated the formation of SAC-PAV and the PSCC.
What other bodies are connected with SAC-PAV? ASIO is for a start, and of course the military. Then there is the Australian Federal Police, many of whose officers end up in the PSCC, the Australian Protective Service, which is an off-shoot of the Australian Federal Police, and is also seen as another ‘Intelligence Service’ which, by the way is responsible for security at the Woomera base where rioting illegal immigrants were treated with force outside that considered by proper police forces. The Department of Foreign affairs, and the list goes on, even to include bodies from New Zealand!
Mass murder in Australia : Tavistock’s Martin Bryant.
by Allen Douglas and Michael JJ Sharrp
Terry, From what I’ve read your sketch is accurate. I’ve done a bit of donkey shooting from helicopters and one year they gave me an SLR to use. The peep sight was a bloody hopeless pest and got in the road. I much preferred the 7.62 bolt action on which I filed out a big V on the front sight. Much quicker to get off a heart shot in a mob. Once I got going it was like pointing your finger of which the rifle was but an extension. Only difference I did look down the barrel at the target. No way could the Port Arthur shooter have carried out the task with accuracy in the time frame by trying to sight the rifle.
I met some fellows from Tasmania – not very bright bright, who got around with Martin Bryant in their younger days. They said he was a Christian and was always talking about the Bible.
OFF-TOPIC.
SCOMO GAVE THIS SPEECH IN CANBERRA TO THE AUSTRALIA-ISRAEL GROUP:
New Zealand has world class police, medical and forensic staff and any assistance we are providing reflects simply the scale of these atrocities.
Rightly, this is a time for grief and it is a time for reflection.
In time, we will have a better idea of how this all happened.
How did this terrorist stay in the shadows, hiding among us in plain sight? [EXCELLENT QUESTION!!]
Where and how did his vile radicalisation take place? [HOW ABOUT CHECHNYA?] During the last three years the terrorist spent just 45 days in Australia, travelling extensively overseas.
What laws need to change, what additional actions and precautions need to be taken?
Answers to those questions will come with time, and must.
Such questions are practical and necessary and can be posed and considered without the need for defensiveness or blame.
[AHEM, AHEM. ANYBODY WANT TO BLAME ANYBODY FOR APRIL 28, 1996?]
And if Mr. Tarrant (or whatever his real name is or was) only spent 45 days in Australia over the last 3 years, who the hell was funding his travelling and living expenses? Doesn’t travelling overseas require visas? and airline tickets? and hotel bills? and food costs? and not to mention purchases of weapons, ammo, body armour and go-pro cameras to film the operation in order to carry out a terrorist operation.
As Scomo says, “such questions are practical and necessary” and “New Zealand has world class police, medical and forensic staff”
How about these “world class police” do their damn job and stop allowing these atrocities to happen.
http://www.hiddenmysteries.org/…/conspiracy/parthur2.html Barry Unsworth had discovered in his effort to retain the New South Wales Government in 1988 that any government that moved into the area of gun control would lose power at the next election, be that State or Federal. Again, because of the moves against the gun owners of Australia, there was a new political party born, and that party had to be destroyed before it gained too much strength within the political sphere.
However, Graeme Richardson gave out one further clue to demonstrate just what the push was, regarding firearm control and that was the shift of power from the States to Canberra. Graeme Richardson stated that the easiest way for uniform firearm laws would be for the States to cede their constitutional powers in relation to firearm to the Federal Government. However, we are then informed that Premier Bob Carr had already initiated legislation in regard to ceding that power to the Federal Government. Now this was before John Howard had announced his ‘National Guidelines’ policy, and it must be viewed as a ploy to have the Prime Minister adopt the full Labor Party Policy in relation to gun control, a policy that emanates from the United Nations.
http://www.hiddenmysteries.org/…/conspiracy/parthur2.html What this demonstrates is that the moves for total firearm control in Australia, is based on that power being controlled by Canberra, and that policy lines itself up with other initiatives that have emanated from Canberra in the past decade such as the push for a Republic and a New Constitution, which would give Canberra complete control over Australia, which was the complete opposite of all those Australians who realised the dangers of centralised power, and opted for the American system of Federation of States back prior to 1900.
What happened in regard to the Port Arthur Massacre was that the entire judicial system was stifled. We were never permitted to have any form of a proper trial for the accused Martin Bryant. We were never permitted to have a Coronial Inquiry, nor shall we ever get any such proper inquiry into that tragic event that has affected so many Australians. Our constitutions have been overruled, our judiciary has been compromised so much so that we appear to be that of Keating’s ‘Banana Republic’, and our government representatives no longer hear the voices of their constituents.
So what happens the next time Australians fail to heed the new ideology? Who will ‘they’ murder to bring us into line? Will it be your parents’ your brother or sister, or your children or grandchildren? Don’t say it will never happen, because it already has.
Had Australia had one politician with the guts, the integrity and the honesty to tell Australians just what had happened, then the bluff would have been called, and little Johnny Howard would never have had to wear his flack jacket at Sale or in Queensland. Australians though are not that lucky.
Arlyn, emotive responses to what the government states is ‘fact’ and is then backed up by media outlets as, ‘News’ that reinforces what the government line is, still controls much of the population of this country.
Emotion will always overcome reason or logic, if the receiver of the information is not already aware of how propaganda is being used to gain control over our entire existence.
There is still far too much trust in our governments and media by a majority of Australians.
Until the many, rather than the current few, realize how they have been manipulated, events like the Port Arthur massacre will remainy out of focus.
Nemesis
Yes I am well aware of the “Emotive Factor” with the corporate-government propaganda apparatus. There are two ways to think about it. It just gets worse if you do nothing to rectify the problem especially when it comes to ‘National Sovereignty’
There are so many talented and reputable websites and Youtube sites where you can get real news compare to what Australia gets fed daily. Yes people need to wake up and start to think differently quickly. A hell of a lot is at stake here called ‘Freedom of Conscience’, ‘Freedom of Choice’, due process, justice and accountability etc.
The Establishment promotes terrorism to support a police state and to justify militarism against those who are considered not one of us to exploit there resources/
It reminds me of the black ops of the Hilton bombing by Special branch who were later disbanded. They tried to blame it on Tim Anderson and the Ananda Marga sect but finally after Tim Anderson was found not guilty and the evidence lead to
Their spying had a collection of 60,000 secret index cards on organisations and individuals including politicians, judges and journalists. The Police Integrity Commission report tabled yesterday found Special Branch was “virtually unaccountable.”The examination of a cabinet in the Special Branch records room revealed firearms, weapons and detonators – some of which had been there for eight years and which the group’s commander admitted to having no knowledge about. The retention of “dirt files” on MPs, significantly increased the risk of “blackmail or extortion” through leaks, the report found.
Between 1939 and 1997, Special Branch also established an additional 10,324 in-depth files however, all but 1079 had been destroyed&emdash;the report found their destruction might have been illegal. [my emphasis: this means the truth about the Hilton Bombing may never be know and shows they had a lot to hide.]
Labelling Special Branch a “law unto itself”, Police Minister Paul Whelan vowed yesterday to ensure as many people as possible had access to their files.
Terry Griffith, one of the policemen injured by the Hilton Hotel bombing, believes ASIO (Australia’s national secret service organisation) and the NSW Special Branch did the bombing. The information he has gathered suggests strongly that they arranged for the bomb to be planted and then to find it in front of the Australian and world media. This tactic would have halted strong public demands to close down Special Branch and reduce ASIO’s security powers. However, due to an apparent timing mishap, the garbage men arrived to empty the bin before the bomb squad, and it exploded in the garbage truck. The Security Forces then pinned the crime on Ananda Marga to cover their mistake.
At the Hilton bombing inquest Griffith alleged that the private secretary of an unnamed Australian senator told him that he had spoken to an ASIO agent who had said ASIO were involved in the bombing. He said an army bomb disposal vehicle was waiting in the city at the time of the explosion (12.40 am) and Special Branch were observing the hotel from nearby, as part of a prearranged action.
Griffith also gave evidence suggesting that even the then Prime Minister of Australia, Malcolm Fraser, may have known about the bungled attempt.
He also said that a man called William Reeve-Parker had told him that an army officer had admitted planting the bomb by switching rubbish bins 24 hours earlier. A statutory declaration by Reeve-Parker was shown at the Hilton bombing Coroner’s inquest. http://members.tripod.com/~Hilton_Bombing/specialbr.html
The Byrant Martin case is clearly another government black ops and the purpose was to disarm Australia. It is obvious it was and is a conspiracy by the government and its agencies and outside forces. This poor soul was selected, used and blamed without a trial. The so-called mainstream press and media were and are still complicit in this conspiracy and tragedy to Byrant Martin and Australia at large. It must be uncovered at all costs. http://crazzfiles.com/martin-bryant-innocent-21-page-submission-to-the-australian-press-council/
-Political wrangling before the event from 1995 onwards-
*Police Officer closest to Port Arthur, Constable Chris Iles was moved to another station after 15 years, replaced by Constable Paul Hyland.
*Ian Kingston manager of the areas state emergency service since 1984 took a part time job as security manager and parking attendant at Port Arthur site.
*In March 96 a month before the ‘EVENT’, Tasmanian Premier Ray Groom ‘stepped down’ from the premier role to take on a number of different portfolios which all had to do with the P.A.M., including Attorney-General and Minister of Port Arthur.
*The Special Operations Group got a new leader, Hank Timmermann ten days before the massacre. Were these moves to put people ‘on the team’ into position https://www.change.org/…/the-hon-will…/u/14199470
Did anyone ever try going to the Chief Justice in Tasmania after the Kangaroo court was over? It would be yet another embarrassment if they refused and another embarrassment if they actually followed it through to expose the sinister event.
The Constitution of Tasmania is silent on the establishment of the State judiciary. The Supreme Court of Tasmania was originally vested with its jurisdiction by the Australian Courts Act 1828, Charters of Justice issued pursuant to it, and the Supreme Court Act 1831 (Tas). However, as there is no State constitutional entrenchment of judicial independence and impartiality, protection of State judicial independence may be repealed by Statute,1 with the ultimate repository of State judicial power resting in the legislature, and not the judiciary.2 The independence and impartiality of judicial officers are secured by the pegging of judicial salaries to South Australia and Western Australia,3 the prohibition on judges from holding parliamentary seats,4 and limited security of tenure.5 These protections are unlikely to be removed due to significant criticism from the public and the legal fraternity. David Clark noted that the suggestion that the legislature might completely dismantle the court system is ‘so unlikely as to be practically in the realms of fantasy.’6 This independence however finds limited support in Constitutional legislation. For instance, judges are only mentioned once in the Tasmanian Constitution Act, which has no provisions (entrenched or otherwise) relating to security of tenure or renumeration; the Supreme Court (Judges’ Independence) Act 1857 (Tas) is silent on the grounds by which judicial officers may be dismissed by Parliament; the Supreme Court Act 1856 (Tas), s 2 expressly allows judges to be sued in the Supreme Court, but does not provide an equivalent express protection from suit in the performance of judicial functions (which instead must be found in the Criminal Code and common law). This leaves the implied or common law protections (except where provided for by the Commonwealth Constitution) subject to erosion by statute. It also does not make judicial independence, impartiality and immunity the clear cornerstones of the constitution system of the state as the Commonwealth Constitution does, and indeed as is reflected by constitutional convention more generally.
The Chief Justice as Lieutenant Governor
It is an ‘autochthonous expedient’ of the Australian constitutional system that the State court can exercise the judicial power of the Commonwealth. The Supreme Court of Tasmania does this when it applies the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), for example, or tries Commonwealth offences. However a notable restriction is that when using the judicial power of the Commonwealth it is bound by its restrictions.7 This exercise of the judicial power of the Commonwealth engages constitutional restrictions for the Tasmanian Parliament.
It cannot impair the institutional integrity of Tasmanian courts. This restriction arose from the case of Kable v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (‘Kable’), and a subsequent line of jurisprudence from the High Court of Australia which clarified the principle.
(Ex PM Howard or the Commonwealth interfered, intervened and ordered no Coronial Enquiry which is criminal offence when foreigners are murdered is this not correct?)
Tasmania’s constitutional arrangements do not require the same separation of judicial power that is needed at a federal level ((Kirk v Industrial Court of New South Wales (2010) 239 CLR 531, 573)). As was explained by Keane J in North Australian Aboriginal Justice Agency, a ‘complaint about the separation of powers’ at the state level is not one which engages the Kable principle and is unconstitutional.8 This is demonstrated in practice in Tasmania through the Magistrates Court being enabled to carry out administrative merits review.9 One significant issue is the fact that the Chief Justice acts as the Lieutenant-Governor of Tasmania. It is accepted that judges can perform non-judicial functions in a personal capacity, provided that the functions conferred on them are not incompatible with their judicial role.10 The High Court confirmed in the case of Wainohu v New South Wales that a form of this incompatibility doctrine extended to state courts.11 It is unclear whether Waihonu compounded a unified doctrine of incompatibility, but Gummow, Hayne, Crennan and Bell JJ suggests there is, as their honours invoked the principles in Wilson.
This is a 2 year old thread but I shall contribute as I think I may be able to clarify some aspects, and deal with a jurisdictional aspect that very few are aware of or able to use.
Firstly the Supreme Court came into being as a grant (so there is a trust which hardly anyone knows about) from the reigning Monarch of the UK at the time, being in the person of King George IV, wherein both NSW and Van Dieman’s Land were given the grant of the Charter of Justice 1923.
At the time the 2 colonies were under the one administration.
The Australian Courts Act of 1828 added to the original Charter of Justice of 1823.
The current Supreme Court Act of 1932 was acknowledgement and facilitated the change in jurisdiction of the State as a consequence of the financial emergencies of the late 1920’s and early 1930’s where the States’ debts were taken over by the Commonwealth.
No longer could the people access the ‘justice’ administered by the new Supreme Court except as in the fictional form of corporate soles, corporations or body politic.
This new jurisdiction overlaid the original jurisdiction, which still existed but became redundant because the people ‘elected’ to abandon it and partake in the new fictional jurisdiction.
That the original jurisdiction still existed is evidenced by the definition of the Supreme Court in the Acts Interpretations Act of 1931 which is:
Supreme Court shall mean the Supreme Court of Tasmania, and shall include the Supreme Court as first constituted under letters patent under the Great Seal of the United Kingdom, dated 13th October 1823;
The Chief Justice in the original Charter of Justice also had the capacity to be the High Chancellor with all the powers of the same for the UK.
And it is in the original equity jurisdiction that the people can seek redress for rights transgressed.
The people have unalienable rights granted to them by God, this being acknowledged by the Monarch in the Coronation Oath.
The Chief Justice acting as the High Chancellor in the jurisdiction of the State in the Commonwealth is the source for these rights to be protected and enforced.
Whereas when the Supreme Court is used by those people presenting as legal fictions, then the people forfeit their unalienable rights for the benefits of using the fictional jurisdiction and receiving whatever benefits are thrown to them.
From personal experience I can state that if presenting as one of the people in the original jurisdiction then the front counter of the Supreme Court is foreign to you, and the forms used under the current Rules are also foreign and inappropriate.
And it goes without saying that the justice in the fictional jurisdiction of the Court is a different form of justice that the Monarch promises to provide through the Coronation Oath.
Gun control is not about guns, it is about CONTROL.
The bad guys want total control of everything. People can keep turning away from what is happening and then one day it will really strike home to them personally. By that time, they will have realized that letters to politicians, to the media, protests in the streets, etc. do not work, but instead are a dead-end street to waste their energies.
Then they have to make the decision to take up pitch-forks – because that’s all they will have.
Not only have the Australian government and ASIO and who else knows what other agency and foreign government/s was part of it, approved a state sponsored terrorist act in murdering innocent foreign US unarmed civilians and Australians with an innocent baby but they have tried to hide the history and revise history in the process with their evil Communist agenda of over-ridding state powers by scaring them into submission and fear. They were all Liberal state governments so why did they not investigate this whole sordid matter with their state intelligence agencies?
What does the legislation say about ASIO operatives acting on behalf of a foreign power against the sovereignty of Australia and against the Australian Constitution? 7 of ASIO’s operatives were also murdered in the Port Arthur Massacre as we know. See how they explain that away…
Were there any Constitutional experts raise their voices when the Commonwealth Government aka ex PM Howard interfere with state rights for the stopping of Coronial Enquiry for the international tourists who were murdered? They were Americans so Australia are allies to this country. I wonder if diplomatic channels were set up by wily Clinton to suppress this info in Tasmania so the police would not have to testify…?
Arlyn, at the time of the Port Arthur massacre, there supposedly was 2 to 3 million firearms of all types in Australian hands. If one takes into consideration that Australians were armed in this country from the get go and had unrestricted access to firearms of all types until the Port Arthur massacre, then the 650.000 firearms that were handed in during the gun buyback scheme was really a piddle in the bucket. Nearly all those handed in were of the antiquated single shot bolt action variety – to my knowledge – and there were not many of the firearms that the government was really targeting handed over at the time – the high powered semi – auto and automatic long arms.
My own experience as a police officer at the time was that neither my colleagues nor I, took over the counter any firearm of the auto or semi-auto variety.
By my own reckoning the government made nearly 2.5 million Australian firearm possessors criminals overnight with their illegal legislation that takes the means of self-defence away from the average law abiding Aussie.
I note that no government is yet prepared to build enough jails to house those 2.5 million Australian ‘illegal’ gun possessors.
Nem, your may remember this thread over on the NZ’s Kiwi Gun Blog. It was back in 2017, well before this psy-op in NZ and lays it all out about what happened in Oz in the comments section.
Thanks Terry – good to go over old ground occasionally.
Terry
Yes they always rob Peter to pay Paul. Taking it from the health is insanity! It is also was an increase in tax that people will not complain about because many think it was the poor Martin Bryant and not the state sponsored terrorism by their own government!
Is true Terry and I really like your style,
We have all the tools we require, all given to us in secondary school. No fear, what I love here
:caveat “tools=democratic dissertation”
Defence lawyers are employed to represent their client to see that he/she receives justice from the system and a fair trial in matters of felonious offences. A Defence lawyer is never employed to convince his client that he/she is guilty for something that his/her client did not do.
John Avery’s part in Martin Bryant’s guilty plea gets rare mention.
As too, does Bryant’s status as being intellectually disadvantaged and not given legal representation, or ‘support’ from a trusted person during his police interviews – that deliberate omission should have raised immediate red flags from other police and the legal fraternity.
But I don’t know of anyone who protested on behalf of Bryant’s lack of legal requirements.
Many lawyers at the Tasmanian Bar have been informed about Bryant’s case – they turn away, they won’t even acknowledge receipt of any information. Cowardice? “What’s in it for me?”
Bugger if I know what is going on down there.
The legislation clearly exists for someone to open up an appeal on ‘new and compelling evidence’.
“A Defence lawyer is never employed to convince his client that he/she is guilty for something that his/her client did not do.”
In WA there’s no such thing as legal representation in a “not guilty” plea to ANY firearms-related charge; the very most that any lawyer will do is a plea bargain. Unfortunately most people don’t realise that consenting to any such deal will ultimately leave them in a worse position than otherwise.
Berry, the reason they have to take a plea is because of ‘legal positivism’ – what ever those hacks in Parliament say is the ‘law’ is the law. There is NO defense.
You may wish to review this article I wrote, it will explain what has happened in Australian law –
I guess the point I’m trying to make is that when anyone outside of the magic legal circle is prepared to take the bull by the horns such corruption simply implodes. So far as I’m concerned the big hurdle is the fact that such accounts are always kept under wraps; only the loser stories are considered worthy of publicity.
Nemesis
Its a ‘brotherhood’ and those who call themselves a “police officer” and stay silent are not police. It is a despicable and an abomination to stay silent over premeditated murder and cover up by the whole police. Surely the Police Commissioner would have also known what is going on.
I would like to know more of the 7 ASIO operatives that were murdered as well.
Arlyn, yes, nearly all organizations are Janus in makeup – the lower levels or the ‘public face’, simply being the ‘shop front’ for the higher level/s agenda that marries into the Global agenda.
Mal, if only some producer had the courage to put together a project, Dee could clean up the draft (she has some dynamite ideas, the first scene cracked me up with the doctors and MSM hacks in Hobart all trying to get booked in for the weekend – classic!)
With a full length movie the entirety of the evidence can be reveled without interruption. No idiots asking stupid questions, no personal insults (how do you insult a movie?), no deflections off into LaLa land – the information just flows straight into their consciousness.
This topic about ‘gun massacres’ is such a big topic nowadays, whether in Oz, or NZ, the U.S., Europe – you would think that such a film would have a large audience available. Crikey, how many people would see it and then tell their friends to see it – just in the U.S. The more the MSM panned it, the more interest it would stir just to see what it was all about.
It shows how scared the producers are that they shy away from it.
Attorney-General George Brandis has commended Senate President Stephen Parry for his service after he announced he will resign upon confirming he has dual citizenship.
Updated Updated 1 November 2017
By Louise Cheer
Senate President Stephen Parry will resign after the UK Home Office confirmed he is a British citizen.
Senator Parry revealed on Tuesday he may be a dual citizenship as his father was born in the UK. He confirmed this was the case on Wednesday.
Senator Parry said he would be submitting his resignation as Senate president and Senator for Tasmania to the Governor-General on Wednesday.
“With a heavy heart I inform you that I have received advice from the British Home Office that I am a British citizen by virtue of my father’s birthplace, thereby being a dual citizen under the provisions of the Australian Constitution,” Senator Parry said in a statement.
No politician at present is eligible to sit in parliament.
Section 44 and Section 46;
Item (9).
.
44. Any person who–
(i. ) Is under any acknowledgment of allegiance, obedience, or adherence to a foreign power, or is a subject or a citizen or entitled to the rights or privileges of a subject or citizen of a foreign power:
The RBA is a foreign power. The UN Charter was signed in full by PM Ford.
The Australian government takes out overseas Bank loans ( The borrower is servant to the lender ).
PROTOCOL No. 20
TYRANNY OF USURY
So long as loans were internal the GOYIM only shuffled their money from the pockets of the poor to those of the rich, but when we bought up the necessary person in order to transfer loans into the external sphere, all the wealth of States flowed into our cash- boxes and all the GOYIM began to pay us the tribute of subjects
According to Wikipedia:
.
“Parry was born on 31 October 1960 in Burnie, Tasmania, to William Stephen Parry and Patricia Dawn Evans. He was educated at Burnie’s Marist Regional College after which he enrolled at the Tasmanian Police Academy in Hobart.
.
Parry was employed as an officer with the Tasmanian Police from 1977 to 1986, and was promoted to Detective in 1983. After leaving the police force, he completed a certificate in Mortuary Science at the Australian College of Funeral Service, and was a funeral director from 1986 to 2004, becoming president of the Australian Funeral Directors Association. Parry was also president of the Burnie Chamber of Commerce and Industry from 2000 to 2004, and a director of the Tasmanian Chamber of Commerce and Industry from 2000 to 2005.”
.
In 2004, Parry was elected to the Australian Senate for the State of Tasmania as a member of the Liberal Party.
.
Senator Parry was eminently qualified to lead the embalming team and as such his published comments would have to be accurate.
.
On February 26 he was emailed a ‘Show Cause’ notice by Keith Noble who accused the Senate Leader of having prior knowledge of the tragedy.
.
As of going to print Mr Noble says he has had no acknowledgement or reply from senator Parry.
.
Cairns News emailed senator Parry’s office with a copy of the notice but he had not responded at the time of going to print……………..”
. https://cairnsnews.org/2016/03/06/startling-new-information-proves-port-arthur-massacre-was-planned-by-government-2/
.
“…………….What we had at Publicdebate.com was an admission that Jean-George Estiot aka Joe Vialls was at Hobart on the evening of the Port Arthur Massacre, and as there was no way for any person to decide to visit Hobart via aeroplane immediately after the news of the massacre broke, as all commercial travel was totally booked out, Joe Vialls had to have been in Hobart prior to the massacre.
However it was not until the ‘Shooters News website identified Joe Vialls as one of the three men on the Broad Arrow Cafe balcony shortly after the massacre that we were able to identify Joe Vialls as the Intelligence officer who was in charge of the psy-ops. By July 2001 the Port Arthur Forum on Publicdebate.com had closed down due to ‘lack of public interest’……….”
I just watched the video Expose EP1 Justice in the Lucky Country which views many Americans in the so-called ‘justice system’.
Australia has the same ‘conditions’ as the US in the suppression of evidence, doctoring of evidence and facts, doctoring of images, police corruption and lies with at times an inept forensic report/s or destruction of evidence, a corrupt Bar system, corrupt government officials, a corrupt media and press that intentionally spread lies, misinformation and disinformation to the public at random with complete impunity! We are living in a police state or police nation already with sedition and High Treason!
I know because I have been involved with the Royal Commission into the Lindy Chamberlain case as the state representative for South Australia. I was especially picked by Betty Hocking who was a member of the House of Assembly in Canberra. I was the the president of the Vietnam Veterans Association for 2 years in the Vietnam Veterans Royal Commission into Chemical Defoliants Agent Orange where I researched, collated and presented evidence to the Royal commission in South Australia where the Federal government tried to hide, coverup, mask and suppress evidence and at times lied. I was involved in the Splatt case and the Perry poison case in South Australia where eventually all were freed.
There are a number of other cases in all states and territories as well that I don’t have to mention.
Governments are simply acting like criminal syndicates or criminal consortiums at the expense of the taxpayer which is a double insult to injury. There are not the proper checks and balances in the Westminster system. Those checks and balances that are there are not being utilised for the Common Good. Our Common Good not their common good of deceit, deception and sedition against the Australian constitution and Australians as whole.https://duckduckgo.com/?q=governments+are+criminal+syndicates&t=opera&ia=web
Corporate Australia
A look into Corporate fraud in Australia, Stranglehold of Monopolies, Telecommunications Oppression, Biased Law System, Corporate influence in politics, Industrial Relations disadvantaging workers, Outsourcing Australian Jobs, Offshore Banking, Petrochemical company domination, Invisibly Visible. It’s not what you see, it’s what goes on behind the scenes. http://corpau.blogspot.com https://realnewsaustralia.com/2016/04/24/1973-the-birth-of-corporate-australia/
Well: politicians, shock jokes, ABC and MSM fakes; seen the short film above?
No questions? All happy little vegemite’s?
Happy that an innocent man could be existing under such cruelty and alone in prison.
‘F. wits”!
Never ever serve on a criminal jury …………… you do not have the intellect to even think of any evidence that may be tendered or spoken.
“arrogant”??? Nah, just plainly: a evil lot of greedy dumb Psychos with their fake ‘prestituted’ running dogs on their side with their snouts in the trough for advertising revenue and a regular massage from the Mockingbird controllers. (As in operation mockingbird …)
I really do fail to see how repeating the “we’ve been betrayed” mantra could possibly free anyone of anything. No significant change of any sort has ever been known to take place save by personal revelation as to how/why one was deceived in the 1st place: I realise that that’s not a comfortable process but there really is no other way of taking authority over anything.
This is where people are required to become patriotic towards their country to take a stand when governments become tyrannical, murderous, deceitful, dishonest, conniving, seditious, and traitors to Australia and to the Australian Constitution.
Other wise people have already ‘surrendered’ to the Communist UN mandate that is supported by the evil Zionists, the Roman Catholic-Church-State and the globalists for global control.
The whole concept of entitlement needs to be ousted by the principle of obligation. Getting a grip on the fact that the former was never intended to do anything but enslave is critical.Any beggar can be turned into a King simply by replacing “the right to a fair trial” with a duty to broadcast the truth to the best of his/her ability.
COMMENT RE “A QUESTION OF GUILT” DOCO LINKED BY DIANNE:
Very interesting to see that a number of the early MSM reports did, in fact, acknowledge that all was not well within their own ranks or the justice system. That’s exactly what I’ve observed 1st hand re divers court cases:A flash-in-the pan “oops we’ve mucked up badly”or “what the hell is going on” is ALWAYS followed by a swift, totally unexplained emphatic denial coupled with palpable discomposure. ALWAYS AND ALWAYS.
Her Bossness made the 10-minute movie, above, with an eye to expanding it later.
Dee wanted to do a short 10 minute video that people would be inclined to watch. I also prepared a rough draft screenplay for her to work from to understand the evidence. Not surprisingly, nobody wants to touch a longer full length movie – they are way too scared to take on such a project.
The draft screenplay does help to explain the evidence in a story form and the dialogue helps fill in some facts. Here’s a one of the scenes.
SCENE OF EMILY WITH HER RETIRED CONFIDANT
Emily is having lunch with a friend who worked in Special Forces and Intelligence, he’s older man that looks weathered – Emily: “What did you think of the information I sent you? Do you have any ideas about this guy that did the killing?” John pushes the manila envelope back to Emily. John: “The shooter was a pro alright, I’m good but not that good. He was so good that it boggles the mind that people haven’t caught on. The first thing I noticed was he shot from the hip, that is difficult, the movies make it look easy, but that’s because they want to film the actor’s faces, can’t do that when the actor is looking down the barrel.” Emily: “How much practice would it take to be able to shoot from the hip?” John: “More than I wanted to do, let alone waste that much ammo trying to get good.”
John opens his left hand and continues “Bryant also shot from the left side, this guy shot from the right, looks like they couldn’t find a left-handed shooter or maybe they didn’t know how Bryant shot, or that people wouldn’t notice, whatever, it was a big screw-up” Emily: “He was a very good shot, 19 of the 20 people in the Café were hit in the head.” John: “Head, neck, same thing, it is a CNS shot, a central nervous system hit. You can shoot a man through the heart and even if the blood flow stops immediately he still has enough oxygen in his brain for another 10 seconds, maybe more. That’s a long time to deal with someone that is really pissed off. A CNS shot is immediate incapacity. That was the result this guy was aiming at, he wanted those people to go down quick without any issues. Bryant wouldn’t know that, this guy was experienced, not Bryant.”
John continues “There were plenty of other things I noticed. The shooter stopped at 29 rounds and changed magazines. That is a trick where you put a tracer in the next to the last round in the magazine. When you see the tracer, you drop the empty mag and put in a fresh one. The last round from the previous magazine is already chambered and you don’t have to remove your hand from the trigger to recycle the action. They should have put the tracer in the 26th or 27th position, that way there would have been a few rounds left in the magazine. By doing it military style, they gave the game away.”
“Then there is the way the guy did a classic ambush technique of burning a magazine and then putting in a fresh one to use while he withdraws. I’d say this guy has done similar things before. Then there is his attempt to kidnap the woman.” Emily: “Mrs. Mikac?” John: “Yeah, he told her to get down on her knees. That is a common technique for taking a prisoner. He told her three times to get down on her knees – on your knees, on your knees, on your knees.” Emily: “Why did he kill her?” John: “Probably the little girls complicated things, so he killed them all. I figure the script they were working from required him to take a female hostage. First Mikac, then the toll booth argument and finally at the General Store. Each time he was going for a woman. I think he finally gave up when the woman at the store refused to get out of the car and the boyfriend volunteered. So he took the boyfriend and killed the woman. He also didn’t put the SLR down at the tollbooth, he kept it up and at the ready with his right hand and pulled the bodies out with his left hand. Most people would put down the gun to move the bodies, not this guy. He was an experienced killer, most likely former military.”
John tapping the envelope John: “I also noticed that Paul Mullen gave the psychiatric report – that is a big red flag nowadays.” Emily: “Why, who is he?” John: “He’s the go-to boy for a cover-up. He interviewed Julian Knight of the Hoddle Street massacre, and he just happened to be living in Aramoana, New Zealand when they had the massacre there and interviewed Gray. The big give away was when he was appointed the Court psychiatrist in the Chemlsford Royal Commission.” John smiling. Emily: “I don’t understand” John: “Chelmsford was a place for doing mind control experiments in Australia. The CIA had moved the MK ULTRA experiments out of the U.S. and into Canada and Australia. Dr. Bailey at Chelmsford was in contact with Dr. Cameron in Canada and they were comparing notes. They killed 24 people at Chelmsford trying to mess with those people’s minds. The Royal Commission was a white wash that attributed the deaths to medical negligence, but what they were doing was intentional, they were using the people like lab rats. Mullen was appointed the Court psychiatrist to make sure the Royal Commission avoided the mind control links.” Emily: “This is freaking me out.” John: “Wait until you get as old as me, nothing will surprise you anymore.”
Emily: “Any ideas who is behind this? John: “It’s international, but I can give you one name. Ever hear of George Soros?” Emily: “Yes, I thought he was just a big time investor.” John: “He’s into a lot of things with his NGOs, that’s Non-Government Organisations. See if you can get access to the financial records of The Coalition for Gun Control. The head of the Coalition is a woman named Rebecca Peters, she’s on Soros bankroll through his Open Society. I expect you will start connecting dots back to Soros and his NGOs.” Emily: “It was Roland Browne of the Coalition for Gun Control that said ‘We are going to have a massacre in Tasmania like those elsewhere’”
John: “Yes, I remember what he said, (smiling) he must be a prophet (sarcasm). – The Attorney General, Daryl Williams, was also financing the Coalition for Gun Control, he gave them $80,000 of public money and got caught. He’s also the Patron for the Western Australian branch of the Coalition.”
John continuing: “The Coalition for Gun Control isn’t the only NGO involved. Take a look at the AIC, the Australian Institute of Criminology. They’re the government body that has come up with all the phoney gun control figures.” Emily: “What phoney figures?” John: “Everything they’ve been saying is a lie. They said that 700 people are killed by guns each year in Australia, the truth is it is around 80. They had to pad the statistics, so they added in firearm suicides, which are around 450.” Emily: “That still doesn’t add up to 700.” John: “Like I said, they lie, they just grabbed a few hundred more out of thin air – 700 people killed by guns. – What do you think is the highest form of homicide is?” Emily: “Guns?” John: “Nope, it is assault, kicking, stomping, clubbing your fellow citizens to death. The second highest is knives. Guns rank third. Even if you take away all the guns, you will still have the intent to kill and people find their ways.” Emily: “I had no idea about any of that.” John: “Of course not, you have to get your information from legitimate sources. Here’s one that the AIC will never publish. The homicide rate through the 20th Century is fairly consistent year after year, except for one period where the rate dropped significantly. Care to take a guess when that was?” Emily: “I have no idea.” John: “It was during WWII when virtually every man and his dog was walking around with a firearm.” John laughs, “The BS coming out of the AIC is so deep you need gum boots to wade through it.”
Emily: “Is the AIC a Soros NGO?” John: “It might as well be. The Director of the AIC is a bloke named Duncan Chappell (John places his right hand down) he was also the Chairman of the NCV, the National Committee against Violence (John places his left hand down), which was the organisation that gave the AIC the desired recommendations for the gun laws. Go back one more step (John moves his right hand over to the other side of his left hand) and you get to the United Nations and Soros with his UNICRI. They were the ones directing the NCV. – It is like a shell game, they use multiple bodies to create the illusion of independent organisations when it is really being directed from a single source. (John leap frogs his right hand onto the left hand, then places the right hand down again.) “Then when Chappell leaves the AIC, he goes to work for his mates at UNICRI” (John moves his right hand back over to the other side of the left hand). John smiles “The pea is under all the shells – and none.” (John turns his hands over to show they’re empty)
Emily: “Thanks for looking at this, is there anything else?” John: “Yeah, be careful – and thanks for the lunch.”
Excellent Terry
From what I’ve seen you do, I’m sure you can clean that scene up much better.
I also like the way you introduced Jim Laycock earlier in the screenplay, that definitely has an impact on the evidence.
This was sent to me by a friend of mine after I have been sending information on.
21 DEC 2015
TO:
TASMANIA BARRISTERS
THE TASMANIAN BAR
Andrew James Abbott SC, William Ayliffe, Greg Barns, Kim Laura Baumeler, Raymond J. Broomhall, Aneita Browning, Bernard Cairns, Dan Coombes, Tom Cox, Kate Cuthbertson, Matthew Goldberg, Caroline Graves, Philip John Gray, Bill Griffiths, Chris Gunson, Craig Hobbs, Philip Jackson, Todd Kovacic, Joseph Lee, Bruce McTaggert, Aziz Gregory Melick, David Mitchell, Kate Mooney, Michael O’Farrell SC, Garth O’Rafferty, Keyan A.M. Pitt QC, David Porter QC, Ken Read SC, Mark Rinaldi, Mary Anne Ryan, Cameron Scott, Julian P. Siggins, Rodney J. Skiller, Ken Stanton, Garth Stevens, Charles Sweeney QC, Sandra Taglieri, Philip Theobald, Andrew Walker, Jennifer Mary White, Andrew Wood, Justin Zeeman, Phillip Zeeman. (43)
On 22 and 27 NOV 2015, you were sent emails related to the wrongful imprisonment of innocent Martin Bryant. (copies available to all readers on request) My email to you of the 22nd ends with these words:
“If no written statement declaring that Martin Bryant has NOT had his legal rights fulfilled is made public by you, by 20 December 2015, then the only conclusion can be is that the Barristers of Tasmania are wilfully corrupt like the Tasmanian State which is responsible for the official killing at Port Arthur in April 1996. (see MASS MURDER and THE WORST OF BRITISH JUSTICE) That conclusion together with your names (and images?) will be distributed internationally and no doubt it will be websited on the Internet. You are involved with Martin Bryant – you cannot wash your hands of his coercion, conviction, incarceration, torture, and impending death. Again, you are reminded that you are all officers of the supreme court of Tasmania. Your ethical responsibilities are not dependent on whether you receive financial payment.”
But, no written statement has been made public by you. So it is concluded:
You – OFFICERS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA – are wilfully corrupt; and,
You – OFFICERS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA – cannot wash your hands of his coercion, conviction, incarceration, torture, and impending death of innocent Martin Bryant now incarcerated in Tasmania for the term of his natural life.
You were sent an email (22 NOV 2015) from your barristerial colleague Paul Mason, now in Brisbane. He states this: “Although I am no longer a member of the Tasmanian Bar, it would disturb me if all avenues judicial, administrative and political were not pursued to enable Mr. Bryant’s removal from lifelong solitary confinement and rehabilitation in custody or even application for eventual release…. Solitary confinement is inherently a torture….” (thank you Paul Mason)
Of course torture is not the whole story. You know this. The mentally-handicapped Martin Bryant is incarcerated for life but he has never had a trial. NO TRIAL!!! The entire legal system in Tasmania was turned on its head – NO coronial inquest, NO credible public inquiry, NO royal commission, NO trial – to ensure innocent Martin can never speak to the public. Your legal colleagues – mongrels* John Avery, Damian Bugg, and William Cox – put Martin in prison. (* Australian slang for a despicable person)
All of you, officers of the supreme court of Tasmania, have allowed this, and continue to allow it, and, it seems, will continue to allow it until innocent Martin Bryant is DEAD! What gutless mongrels you are. You, with your sharp Salamanca addresses and stunning sandstone offices. You don’t give a damn for that “caged circus animal” (Gary Ramage; photographer, News Corp Australia). You concur with the following: “Burn in hell”; “Burn him alive”; “Filthy fat scum”; “Firing squad practice sessions”; “Give him a bullet”; “…he should have got the firing squad scum bag animal”; “…one of the inmates should knock him”; “This pos sucks dicks to get chocolate”; “Injection soon”; “Kill him”; Etc. (SUBMISSION DOCUMENT TO AUSTRALIAN PRESS COUNCIL: News Corp Australia Articles Inciting Hatred & Killing) You concur with these cruel words and the fact that the Australian Press Council refuses to take action against News Corp Australia from publishing articles which incite hatred and killing. It is noted that not one of you have spoken out about this. (Please correct me if I am wrong.)
Over 70 years ago on 1 NOV 1945, Australia became an official member of the United Nations. Within, its Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 11(1) reads as follows: “Everyone charged with a penal offence has the right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty according to law in a public trial at which he has had all the guarantees necessary for his defence.” But you have, to date, ensured that innocent Martin Bryant is incarcerated without any proper legal defence and without a trial. This is undeniable. But you and your sophistry (barristerial bullshit) will probably argue some exclusionary reason which denies Martin Bryant his inalienable human rights. The literature is devoid of any legal concerns or defence raised on Martin’s behalf which has arisen from you the barristers of Tasmania. You turned away as this boy-man was set up, demonized with false words and manipulated images, coerced, convicted, then incarcerated where he is now being slowly tortured to death. Your abject and appalling nonfeasance makes all of you GUTLESS MONGRELS. This is undeniable too.
So now things will move ahead. Twenty years of wrongful imprisonment are up in APR 2016. If someone (official or unofficial) does not “knock him” before this date, innocent Martin Bryant and the official killing (APR 1996) at Port Arthur will be made subjects of household conversations throughout Australia. And right in the middle of this, it is our (decent people in and out of Australia) intention to ensure that you, the GUTLESS MONGREL BARRISTERS OF TASMANIA, are mentioned.
In the beautiful Apple Isle, you approved Martin’s imprisonment with NO TRIAL. You approve of his ongoing torture. You approve of him being put in a cage to be photographed with the images being displayed in newspapers and on newspaper websites around the world. You approve of the living hell his dear mother and sister are being put through – day after day for nearly 20 years. And you do not care if the families, relatives, and friends of all the Port Arthur Massacre victims have been lied to and NOT served justice. All of you are complicit right up to your ridiculous horsehair wigs.
Continuation from my friend
image001.png Cameron SCOTT
“Cameron was educated at the University of Tasmania, upon graduation he commenced working as a criminal lawyer in Melbourne’s Western suburbs. Cameron later moved into the Melbourne CBD where he practised as both a criminal and family lawyer. Cameron has returned to Tasmania where he has established himself as a barrister.” (http://www.tasmanianbar.com.au/)
Cameron, you must have been right there in Tasmania when the Port Arthur Massacre was officially perpetrated. Has it not bothered you – not even once? – that Martin Bryant had NO TRIAL? What kind of legal enlightenment was bestowed on you at that University of Tasmania? Innocent until proven guilty is a foundational principle of your profession.
Don’t tell me Chester Porter QC is full of bull when he states: “The fundamental basis of liberty in the common law of England and Australia is the presumption of innocence. Thus any person accused of a crime is presumed to be innocent until his or her guilt is proved beyond reasonable doubt in a court of law.” (The Conviction of the Innocent: How the Law Can Let Us Down; 2007: p.1). Don’t tell me the guilty plea forced down Martin’s throat by that criminal of a lawyer John Avery permitted your legal system to dismiss every right Martin had. To treat him as an Untermensch. Quoting Chester Porter QC again: “If a person has an IQ of seventy, it is not difficult…to persuade him or her to confess to almost anything.” (p.19) Martin had an even lower IQ of 66 and he lived his life at a school-grade 6 level. It was easy for your mongrel mates John Avery, Damian Bugg, and William Cox to kick his guts in then send him to Risdon Prison – forever. It is the worst contrived injustice in the history of Australia.
So Cameron, you say you studied and practiced criminal law. So then do the right thing for innocent Martin Bryant. But if however you don’t like what I have just written, go and tell your own family that Martin Bryant had the best of British justice. Tell them his legal-aid lawyer was truly brilliant. Tell your family that even though Martin never had a trial, he is truly guilty of killing 35 people and wounding 23 others at seven crime scenes – all on his own. Tell them he arranged for the 22-body refrigerated mortuary vehicle and the special embalming equipment – all on his own. Tell them he held off a highly-armed and trained police assault group overnight – all on his own. And while he did so he made snacks, used the toilet, and had dozens of scripted phone conversations with the police negotiator while using firearms he never owned and which inexplicably were damaged just before he set himself alight then calmly waited inside Seascape Cottage until he had some 3rd-degree burns on his back. Tell your family that he is guilty because everyone knows he did it. And tell your family that Pope Francis is an absolute jackass for saying: “Life imprisonment is a hidden death penalty.” (http://www.cruxnow.com/life/2014/10/23/pope-francis-blasts-supermax-prisons-as-torture/) Cameron – tell them whatever you like. But then look at yourself in a mirror, with or without your wig. What will you see? A man or a mouse?
All your names, and the available images as per the listing on the Tasmanian BAR website, will be used as deemed appropriate to convey to the world how complicit and corrupt you barristers really are. If you don’t like this, take me on in the court of public opinion.
A pdf copy of LEAKED DOCUMENTS will be emailed to you separately. None of you requested a copy, which is most telling. It’s free, you’ll like that. Read what witnesses reveal in their statements. Have no doubt that most of you will try and make their words inculpatory so you can wash your hands of this evil matter. But just like the mongrels Avery, Bugg, and Cox, you won’t be able to. You are marred by guilt, and guilt grows. Your legal system in Tasmania is complicit and corrupt to the core when it comes to the Port Arthur Massacre and the wrongful imprisonment of innocent Martin Bryant.
Read what the State does not want the public to know. Get some courage (not more piss into you down at the barristers’ bar), stand up, and speak out for a mentally-handicapped boy-man who is now being officially tortured to death à la Guantánamonot far from you. His family lives in hell. And all the families, relatives, and friends of the Port Arthur Massacre victims have NOT been served justice. This must end.
STAND UP AND SPEAK OUT – FOR TRUTH! FOR JUSTICE!
Sincerely,
Dr. Keith Allan Noble; author
Unit 72 B, Am Heumarkt 7
1030 Vienna, Austria
t. 43-1-9712401
copies distributed internationally
related releases:
REWARD (A$20,000)
Replication of Images Inciting Hatred & Killing
Published by News Corp Australia
2015 NOV 22
poster & conditions: murder.research@gmail.com
LEAKED DOCUMENTS:
Statements of Port Arthur Massacre Witnesses
leaked from DPP Office, Hobart, Tasmania
2015; 122 pp.
free pdfs: murder.research@gmail.com
SUBMISSION DOCUMENT TO AUSTRALIAN PRESS COUNCIL:
News Corp Australia Articles Inciting Hatred & Killing
2015 SEP 22; 21 pp.
free pdfs: murder.research@gmail.com
THE WORST OF BRITISH JUSTICE:
Readings Related to Injustice in Australia
(66 Readings; 80 Inserts; 100 authors)
2015; 2nd edition; 796 pp.
free pdfs: BIGWORMBOOKS@gmx.net
paperbacks: bookfinder.com
MASS MURDER:
Official Killing in Tasmania, Australia
2014; 2nd edition; 696 pp.
free pdfs: BIGWORMBOOKS@gmx.net
paperbacks: bookfinder.com
A warning given to Tasmanian barristers about Martin Bryant and Port Arthur
https://cairnsnews.org/2015/12/30/a-warning-given-to-tasmanian-barristers-about-martin-bryant-and-port-arthur/
“Australian Government Is Officially Illegal” (click on link for full article
https://plus.google.com/112392970850640272504/posts/TmWLKb1gnN6
These 8 sentences below explain it all especially after 30 years!
“Australian Government Is Officially Illegal”
“The recent attempts by the Tasmania State Government to amend Laws to ensure validity was a poor effort to hide the facts and legal errors of the past, but more important it shows something is not right!”
“In April 2015, the Tasmania GOVERNMENT oversight has cast a question mark over the appointment of the state’s magistrates, coroners and justices of the peace. In fact, this oversight applies to all state’s of Australia.”
“Under the 1869 Promissory Oaths Act, all magistrates, coroners and justices of the peace are required to take the judicial oath tendered by the Clerk of the Executive Council and taken in the presence of the Governor or the Chief Justice or another judge of the Supreme Court.:
That originally was for the respect of office and to testify by an eye witness of high authority that has been blatantly ignored in my opinion.
“The requirement has not been followed for 30 years. Why hasn’t it? Who stopped it? Did no one question the stoppage? Many questions after 30 years of insubordination is my opinion. I would love to hear the excuses after 3 decades! Malfeasance in Office is another charge against them as well
“”Valid Law and Government Does Not Exist In Australia, and has been noted in the UK Parliament and at the UN.”
A group of us have been fully aware of this “Concealed Colony” business for decades… it could be more.
Then we have sedition, treason and spying:
Aussie Government collusion
According to this presenter, ex Pm Malcom Turnbull, Julie Bishop, Alexander Downer and George Brandis is going to be indicted shortly for their part of attempting to overthrow a duly elected president of a foreign country and colluding with another country to do so the UK.
1st Comment
I have seen three Youtube videos mentioning Alexander Downer and also how Australia and the UK illegally spied on President Elect Trump and how they continued to spy on him after he was elected President. Both governments then went through diplomatic channels to keep this secret from both countries. I think the Whittaker is the name you wanted. as AG. They have had to cleanse the Department of Justice and the FBI of criminal elements at the highest level prior to getting Judge Kavanaugh in office. Then they can commence the military tribunals against these traitors, murderers, pedophiles, blackmailing and bribing, sedition etc. As ex Prime Minister Turnbull was in office at the time and President Trump, Q and others were quite angry about this illegal spying between allies. The Americans have done it in the past as well. So the Gang of Four or more Malcolm Turnbull, Julie Bishop the Minster for Foreign Affairs, George Brandis the High Commissioner to the UK and Alexander Downer who was the High commissioner in London. I would add the insidious criminal CIA who have most certainly infiltrated the Australian intelligence services which is quite obvious in a number of areas. This is High Treason of helping a foreign government to oust a democratically elected President of another country. If this is so, I hope all get properly indicted and charged with stiff jail terms and fined heavy penalties.
Lastly we have TreasonTreason in Australia
https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=10204387420721357&id=1705651486
An excellent speech by Andrew Wilkie in which no other politicians will mention! It is such pity that there are only a handful of people in the chamber! What does that tell us? Australians need to wake up and take notice!
I have said ever since 9/11, in which it was never open to debate, discussion or dialogue about who was actually behind that audacious event to create series of perpetual false flag wars for the Fascist US and for the evil Zionist Israeli regime.
Parliament can’t even debate on issues let alone vote of them! That is certainly not a democratic principle. The Westminster system is undemocratic and there are far too many Executive decisions being made without judicial and legislative oversight with the proper checks and balances.
AUSSIE TREASON
Aussie Treason Part 2
Aussie Collusion
Australian Government Acts of Treason 1/4
It has been said over and over without any effort before Aussie Treason Part 1 & 2 just recently a few months
So obviously something is very very wrong and everyone is just going along fine minding their own business with all of the above going on! Amazing to me!
Thank you for this work Dee, Terry et al- yes the evidence is certainly there. I found this account of events today, of particular interest to me, the media watch report.
So you have both political parties and others supporting the signature of a Communist UN in finance, support and ambassadors.
http://www.hiddenmysteries.org/conspiracy/conspiracy/parthur2.html All this action by the Tasmania Police was as per the SOG manual, prepared by SAC-PAV, the Federal based body that controls the Police SOGs, in the SAC-PAV ‘Anti-Terrorist Plan’ that had been implemented in November 1995. Now the SAC-PAV has control of the various State Police SOG bodies, but not only that, they also have trained other members of the police, such as the Police Media Liaison Officers. However, what is of real interest is the fact that the SAC-PAV is run by the ‘Protective Security Co-ordination Centre’, the PSCC, which is an intelligence body operating out of both the Federal Attorney General’s Department and the Justice Department. It has also been recorded that the Police Special Branches were also being run by the PSCC.
We have been informed by ‘A Current Affair’ that the three top Tasmania Policemen, McCreadie, Prins and Bennett are all SAC-PAV trained. So was their Media Liaison Officer, Geoff Easton who prior to his appointment with the Tasmania Police was a Communications Officer at Canberra. Another Media Officer was Peter Hazelwood, who has connections with the Hilton Hotel Bombing back in 1978. It was this event that initiated the formation of SAC-PAV and the PSCC.
What other bodies are connected with SAC-PAV? ASIO is for a start, and of course the military. Then there is the Australian Federal Police, many of whose officers end up in the PSCC, the Australian Protective Service, which is an off-shoot of the Australian Federal Police, and is also seen as another ‘Intelligence Service’ which, by the way is responsible for security at the Woomera base where rioting illegal immigrants were treated with force outside that considered by proper police forces. The Department of Foreign affairs, and the list goes on, even to include bodies from New Zealand!
Mass murder in Australia : Tavistock’s Martin Bryant.
by Allen Douglas and Michael JJ Sharrp
Again I refer to Mary’s Deliverance
sorry about above–the link should have been:
https://larouchepub.com/eiw/public/1997/eirv24n21-19970516/eirv24n21-19970516_046-mass_murder_in_australia_tavisto.pdf
Terry, From what I’ve read your sketch is accurate. I’ve done a bit of donkey shooting from helicopters and one year they gave me an SLR to use. The peep sight was a bloody hopeless pest and got in the road. I much preferred the 7.62 bolt action on which I filed out a big V on the front sight. Much quicker to get off a heart shot in a mob. Once I got going it was like pointing your finger of which the rifle was but an extension. Only difference I did look down the barrel at the target. No way could the Port Arthur shooter have carried out the task with accuracy in the time frame by trying to sight the rifle.
I met some fellows from Tasmania – not very bright bright, who got around with Martin Bryant in their younger days. They said he was a Christian and was always talking about the Bible.
OFF-TOPIC.
SCOMO GAVE THIS SPEECH IN CANBERRA TO THE AUSTRALIA-ISRAEL GROUP:
New Zealand has world class police, medical and forensic staff and any assistance we are providing reflects simply the scale of these atrocities.
Rightly, this is a time for grief and it is a time for reflection.
In time, we will have a better idea of how this all happened.
How did this terrorist stay in the shadows, hiding among us in plain sight? [EXCELLENT QUESTION!!]
Where and how did his vile radicalisation take place? [HOW ABOUT CHECHNYA?] During the last three years the terrorist spent just 45 days in Australia, travelling extensively overseas.
What laws need to change, what additional actions and precautions need to be taken?
Answers to those questions will come with time, and must.
Such questions are practical and necessary and can be posed and considered without the need for defensiveness or blame.
[AHEM, AHEM. ANYBODY WANT TO BLAME ANYBODY FOR APRIL 28, 1996?]
And if Mr. Tarrant (or whatever his real name is or was) only spent 45 days in Australia over the last 3 years, who the hell was funding his travelling and living expenses? Doesn’t travelling overseas require visas? and airline tickets? and hotel bills? and food costs? and not to mention purchases of weapons, ammo, body armour and go-pro cameras to film the operation in order to carry out a terrorist operation.
As Scomo says, “such questions are practical and necessary” and “New Zealand has world class police, medical and forensic staff”
How about these “world class police” do their damn job and stop allowing these atrocities to happen.
They really do think we’re stupid.
http://www.hiddenmysteries.org/…/conspiracy/parthur2.html Barry Unsworth had discovered in his effort to retain the New South Wales Government in 1988 that any government that moved into the area of gun control would lose power at the next election, be that State or Federal. Again, because of the moves against the gun owners of Australia, there was a new political party born, and that party had to be destroyed before it gained too much strength within the political sphere.
However, Graeme Richardson gave out one further clue to demonstrate just what the push was, regarding firearm control and that was the shift of power from the States to Canberra. Graeme Richardson stated that the easiest way for uniform firearm laws would be for the States to cede their constitutional powers in relation to firearm to the Federal Government. However, we are then informed that Premier Bob Carr had already initiated legislation in regard to ceding that power to the Federal Government. Now this was before John Howard had announced his ‘National Guidelines’ policy, and it must be viewed as a ploy to have the Prime Minister adopt the full Labor Party Policy in relation to gun control, a policy that emanates from the United Nations.
http://www.hiddenmysteries.org/…/conspiracy/parthur2.html What this demonstrates is that the moves for total firearm control in Australia, is based on that power being controlled by Canberra, and that policy lines itself up with other initiatives that have emanated from Canberra in the past decade such as the push for a Republic and a New Constitution, which would give Canberra complete control over Australia, which was the complete opposite of all those Australians who realised the dangers of centralised power, and opted for the American system of Federation of States back prior to 1900.
What happened in regard to the Port Arthur Massacre was that the entire judicial system was stifled. We were never permitted to have any form of a proper trial for the accused Martin Bryant. We were never permitted to have a Coronial Inquiry, nor shall we ever get any such proper inquiry into that tragic event that has affected so many Australians. Our constitutions have been overruled, our judiciary has been compromised so much so that we appear to be that of Keating’s ‘Banana Republic’, and our government representatives no longer hear the voices of their constituents.
So what happens the next time Australians fail to heed the new ideology? Who will ‘they’ murder to bring us into line? Will it be your parents’ your brother or sister, or your children or grandchildren? Don’t say it will never happen, because it already has.
Had Australia had one politician with the guts, the integrity and the honesty to tell Australians just what had happened, then the bluff would have been called, and little Johnny Howard would never have had to wear his flack jacket at Sale or in Queensland. Australians though are not that lucky.
Arlyn, emotive responses to what the government states is ‘fact’ and is then backed up by media outlets as, ‘News’ that reinforces what the government line is, still controls much of the population of this country.
Emotion will always overcome reason or logic, if the receiver of the information is not already aware of how propaganda is being used to gain control over our entire existence.
There is still far too much trust in our governments and media by a majority of Australians.
Until the many, rather than the current few, realize how they have been manipulated, events like the Port Arthur massacre will remainy out of focus.
Nemesis
Yes I am well aware of the “Emotive Factor” with the corporate-government propaganda apparatus. There are two ways to think about it. It just gets worse if you do nothing to rectify the problem especially when it comes to ‘National Sovereignty’
There are so many talented and reputable websites and Youtube sites where you can get real news compare to what Australia gets fed daily. Yes people need to wake up and start to think differently quickly. A hell of a lot is at stake here called ‘Freedom of Conscience’, ‘Freedom of Choice’, due process, justice and accountability etc.
The Establishment promotes terrorism to support a police state and to justify militarism against those who are considered not one of us to exploit there resources/
It reminds me of the black ops of the Hilton bombing by Special branch who were later disbanded. They tried to blame it on Tim Anderson and the Ananda Marga sect but finally after Tim Anderson was found not guilty and the evidence lead to
Their spying had a collection of 60,000 secret index cards on organisations and individuals including politicians, judges and journalists. The Police Integrity Commission report tabled yesterday found Special Branch was “virtually unaccountable.”The examination of a cabinet in the Special Branch records room revealed firearms, weapons and detonators – some of which had been there for eight years and which the group’s commander admitted to having no knowledge about. The retention of “dirt files” on MPs, significantly increased the risk of “blackmail or extortion” through leaks, the report found.
Between 1939 and 1997, Special Branch also established an additional 10,324 in-depth files however, all but 1079 had been destroyed&emdash;the report found their destruction might have been illegal. [my emphasis: this means the truth about the Hilton Bombing may never be know and shows they had a lot to hide.]
Labelling Special Branch a “law unto itself”, Police Minister Paul Whelan vowed yesterday to ensure as many people as possible had access to their files.
Terry Griffith, one of the policemen injured by the Hilton Hotel bombing, believes ASIO (Australia’s national secret service organisation) and the NSW Special Branch did the bombing. The information he has gathered suggests strongly that they arranged for the bomb to be planted and then to find it in front of the Australian and world media. This tactic would have halted strong public demands to close down Special Branch and reduce ASIO’s security powers. However, due to an apparent timing mishap, the garbage men arrived to empty the bin before the bomb squad, and it exploded in the garbage truck. The Security Forces then pinned the crime on Ananda Marga to cover their mistake.
At the Hilton bombing inquest Griffith alleged that the private secretary of an unnamed Australian senator told him that he had spoken to an ASIO agent who had said ASIO were involved in the bombing. He said an army bomb disposal vehicle was waiting in the city at the time of the explosion (12.40 am) and Special Branch were observing the hotel from nearby, as part of a prearranged action.
Griffith also gave evidence suggesting that even the then Prime Minister of Australia, Malcolm Fraser, may have known about the bungled attempt.
He also said that a man called William Reeve-Parker had told him that an army officer had admitted planting the bomb by switching rubbish bins 24 hours earlier. A statutory declaration by Reeve-Parker was shown at the Hilton bombing Coroner’s inquest.
http://members.tripod.com/~Hilton_Bombing/specialbr.html
The Byrant Martin case is clearly another government black ops and the purpose was to disarm Australia. It is obvious it was and is a conspiracy by the government and its agencies and outside forces. This poor soul was selected, used and blamed without a trial. The so-called mainstream press and media were and are still complicit in this conspiracy and tragedy to Byrant Martin and Australia at large. It must be uncovered at all costs.
http://crazzfiles.com/martin-bryant-innocent-21-page-submission-to-the-australian-press-council/
-Political wrangling before the event from 1995 onwards-
*Police Officer closest to Port Arthur, Constable Chris Iles was moved to another station after 15 years, replaced by Constable Paul Hyland.
*Ian Kingston manager of the areas state emergency service since 1984 took a part time job as security manager and parking attendant at Port Arthur site.
*In March 96 a month before the ‘EVENT’, Tasmanian Premier Ray Groom ‘stepped down’ from the premier role to take on a number of different portfolios which all had to do with the P.A.M., including Attorney-General and Minister of Port Arthur.
*The Special Operations Group got a new leader, Hank Timmermann ten days before the massacre. Were these moves to put people ‘on the team’ into position https://www.change.org/…/the-hon-will…/u/14199470
Did anyone ever try going to the Chief Justice in Tasmania after the Kangaroo court was over? It would be yet another embarrassment if they refused and another embarrassment if they actually followed it through to expose the sinister event.
Can anyone answer this?
Tasmanian Constitutional Law Reform Project (Abstract click on link for full article)
https://wikis.utas.edu.au/display/TCLRP/The+Judicial+Branch
Current arrangements
The Constitution of Tasmania is silent on the establishment of the State judiciary. The Supreme Court of Tasmania was originally vested with its jurisdiction by the Australian Courts Act 1828, Charters of Justice issued pursuant to it, and the Supreme Court Act 1831 (Tas). However, as there is no State constitutional entrenchment of judicial independence and impartiality, protection of State judicial independence may be repealed by Statute,1 with the ultimate repository of State judicial power resting in the legislature, and not the judiciary.2 The independence and impartiality of judicial officers are secured by the pegging of judicial salaries to South Australia and Western Australia,3 the prohibition on judges from holding parliamentary seats,4 and limited security of tenure.5 These protections are unlikely to be removed due to significant criticism from the public and the legal fraternity. David Clark noted that the suggestion that the legislature might completely dismantle the court system is ‘so unlikely as to be practically in the realms of fantasy.’6 This independence however finds limited support in Constitutional legislation. For instance, judges are only mentioned once in the Tasmanian Constitution Act, which has no provisions (entrenched or otherwise) relating to security of tenure or renumeration; the Supreme Court (Judges’ Independence) Act 1857 (Tas) is silent on the grounds by which judicial officers may be dismissed by Parliament; the Supreme Court Act 1856 (Tas), s 2 expressly allows judges to be sued in the Supreme Court, but does not provide an equivalent express protection from suit in the performance of judicial functions (which instead must be found in the Criminal Code and common law). This leaves the implied or common law protections (except where provided for by the Commonwealth Constitution) subject to erosion by statute. It also does not make judicial independence, impartiality and immunity the clear cornerstones of the constitution system of the state as the Commonwealth Constitution does, and indeed as is reflected by constitutional convention more generally.
The Chief Justice as Lieutenant Governor
It is an ‘autochthonous expedient’ of the Australian constitutional system that the State court can exercise the judicial power of the Commonwealth. The Supreme Court of Tasmania does this when it applies the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), for example, or tries Commonwealth offences. However a notable restriction is that when using the judicial power of the Commonwealth it is bound by its restrictions.7 This exercise of the judicial power of the Commonwealth engages constitutional restrictions for the Tasmanian Parliament.
It cannot impair the institutional integrity of Tasmanian courts. This restriction arose from the case of Kable v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (‘Kable’), and a subsequent line of jurisprudence from the High Court of Australia which clarified the principle.
(Ex PM Howard or the Commonwealth interfered, intervened and ordered no Coronial Enquiry which is criminal offence when foreigners are murdered is this not correct?)
Tasmania’s constitutional arrangements do not require the same separation of judicial power that is needed at a federal level ((Kirk v Industrial Court of New South Wales (2010) 239 CLR 531, 573)). As was explained by Keane J in North Australian Aboriginal Justice Agency, a ‘complaint about the separation of powers’ at the state level is not one which engages the Kable principle and is unconstitutional.8 This is demonstrated in practice in Tasmania through the Magistrates Court being enabled to carry out administrative merits review.9 One significant issue is the fact that the Chief Justice acts as the Lieutenant-Governor of Tasmania. It is accepted that judges can perform non-judicial functions in a personal capacity, provided that the functions conferred on them are not incompatible with their judicial role.10 The High Court confirmed in the case of Wainohu v New South Wales that a form of this incompatibility doctrine extended to state courts.11 It is unclear whether Waihonu compounded a unified doctrine of incompatibility, but Gummow, Hayne, Crennan and Bell JJ suggests there is, as their honours invoked the principles in Wilson.
This is a 2 year old thread but I shall contribute as I think I may be able to clarify some aspects, and deal with a jurisdictional aspect that very few are aware of or able to use.
Firstly the Supreme Court came into being as a grant (so there is a trust which hardly anyone knows about) from the reigning Monarch of the UK at the time, being in the person of King George IV, wherein both NSW and Van Dieman’s Land were given the grant of the Charter of Justice 1923.
At the time the 2 colonies were under the one administration.
The Australian Courts Act of 1828 added to the original Charter of Justice of 1823.
The current Supreme Court Act of 1932 was acknowledgement and facilitated the change in jurisdiction of the State as a consequence of the financial emergencies of the late 1920’s and early 1930’s where the States’ debts were taken over by the Commonwealth.
No longer could the people access the ‘justice’ administered by the new Supreme Court except as in the fictional form of corporate soles, corporations or body politic.
This new jurisdiction overlaid the original jurisdiction, which still existed but became redundant because the people ‘elected’ to abandon it and partake in the new fictional jurisdiction.
That the original jurisdiction still existed is evidenced by the definition of the Supreme Court in the Acts Interpretations Act of 1931 which is:
Supreme Court shall mean the Supreme Court of Tasmania, and shall include the Supreme Court as first constituted under letters patent under the Great Seal of the United Kingdom, dated 13th October 1823;
The Chief Justice in the original Charter of Justice also had the capacity to be the High Chancellor with all the powers of the same for the UK.
And it is in the original equity jurisdiction that the people can seek redress for rights transgressed.
The people have unalienable rights granted to them by God, this being acknowledged by the Monarch in the Coronation Oath.
The Chief Justice acting as the High Chancellor in the jurisdiction of the State in the Commonwealth is the source for these rights to be protected and enforced.
Whereas when the Supreme Court is used by those people presenting as legal fictions, then the people forfeit their unalienable rights for the benefits of using the fictional jurisdiction and receiving whatever benefits are thrown to them.
From personal experience I can state that if presenting as one of the people in the original jurisdiction then the front counter of the Supreme Court is foreign to you, and the forms used under the current Rules are also foreign and inappropriate.
And it goes without saying that the justice in the fictional jurisdiction of the Court is a different form of justice that the Monarch promises to provide through the Coronation Oath.
hotartglass39@gmail.com
Yes it is properly called Theft and Murder!
Gun control is not about guns, it is about CONTROL.
The bad guys want total control of everything. People can keep turning away from what is happening and then one day it will really strike home to them personally. By that time, they will have realized that letters to politicians, to the media, protests in the streets, etc. do not work, but instead are a dead-end street to waste their energies.
Then they have to make the decision to take up pitch-forks – because that’s all they will have.
Australia Admits Gun Buyback Failure, Announces Amnesty
https://bearingarms.com/bob-o/2016/10/21/australia-admits-gun-buyback-failure-amnesty/
Would anyone care to comment on this? I have not seen anyone post this material before as so articulate.
“Australian Government Is Officially Illegal”https://plus.google.com/112392970850640272504/posts/TmWLKb1gnN6
Not only have the Australian government and ASIO and who else knows what other agency and foreign government/s was part of it, approved a state sponsored terrorist act in murdering innocent foreign US unarmed civilians and Australians with an innocent baby but they have tried to hide the history and revise history in the process with their evil Communist agenda of over-ridding state powers by scaring them into submission and fear. They were all Liberal state governments so why did they not investigate this whole sordid matter with their state intelligence agencies?
What does the legislation say about ASIO operatives acting on behalf of a foreign power against the sovereignty of Australia and against the Australian Constitution? 7 of ASIO’s operatives were also murdered in the Port Arthur Massacre as we know. See how they explain that away…
Were there any Constitutional experts raise their voices when the Commonwealth Government aka ex PM Howard interfere with state rights for the stopping of Coronial Enquiry for the international tourists who were murdered? They were Americans so Australia are allies to this country. I wonder if diplomatic channels were set up by wily Clinton to suppress this info in Tasmania so the police would not have to testify…?
Arlyn, at the time of the Port Arthur massacre, there supposedly was 2 to 3 million firearms of all types in Australian hands. If one takes into consideration that Australians were armed in this country from the get go and had unrestricted access to firearms of all types until the Port Arthur massacre, then the 650.000 firearms that were handed in during the gun buyback scheme was really a piddle in the bucket. Nearly all those handed in were of the antiquated single shot bolt action variety – to my knowledge – and there were not many of the firearms that the government was really targeting handed over at the time – the high powered semi – auto and automatic long arms.
My own experience as a police officer at the time was that neither my colleagues nor I, took over the counter any firearm of the auto or semi-auto variety.
By my own reckoning the government made nearly 2.5 million Australian firearm possessors criminals overnight with their illegal legislation that takes the means of self-defence away from the average law abiding Aussie.
I note that no government is yet prepared to build enough jails to house those 2.5 million Australian ‘illegal’ gun possessors.
Nemesis
A very good reply thanks! 🙂
Nem, your may remember this thread over on the NZ’s Kiwi Gun Blog. It was back in 2017, well before this psy-op in NZ and lays it all out about what happened in Oz in the comments section.
https://kiwigunblog.wordpress.com/2017/02/24/are-australian-gun-grabbers-the-worst-mass-murderers-in-the-countrys-history/
Thanks Terry – good to go over old ground occasionally.
Terry
Yes they always rob Peter to pay Paul. Taking it from the health is insanity! It is also was an increase in tax that people will not complain about because many think it was the poor Martin Bryant and not the state sponsored terrorism by their own government!
Is true Terry and I really like your style,
We have all the tools we require, all given to us in secondary school. No fear, what I love here
:caveat “tools=democratic dissertation”
Defence lawyers are employed to represent their client to see that he/she receives justice from the system and a fair trial in matters of felonious offences. A Defence lawyer is never employed to convince his client that he/she is guilty for something that his/her client did not do.
John Avery’s part in Martin Bryant’s guilty plea gets rare mention.
As too, does Bryant’s status as being intellectually disadvantaged and not given legal representation, or ‘support’ from a trusted person during his police interviews – that deliberate omission should have raised immediate red flags from other police and the legal fraternity.
But I don’t know of anyone who protested on behalf of Bryant’s lack of legal requirements.
Many lawyers at the Tasmanian Bar have been informed about Bryant’s case – they turn away, they won’t even acknowledge receipt of any information. Cowardice? “What’s in it for me?”
Bugger if I know what is going on down there.
The legislation clearly exists for someone to open up an appeal on ‘new and compelling evidence’.
“A Defence lawyer is never employed to convince his client that he/she is guilty for something that his/her client did not do.”
In WA there’s no such thing as legal representation in a “not guilty” plea to ANY firearms-related charge; the very most that any lawyer will do is a plea bargain. Unfortunately most people don’t realise that consenting to any such deal will ultimately leave them in a worse position than otherwise.
Berry, the reason they have to take a plea is because of ‘legal positivism’ – what ever those hacks in Parliament say is the ‘law’ is the law. There is NO defense.
You may wish to review this article I wrote, it will explain what has happened in Australian law –
https://gumshoenews.com/2018/06/19/review-of-australian-law-and-its-decline/
Yeah, interesting article.
I guess the point I’m trying to make is that when anyone outside of the magic legal circle is prepared to take the bull by the horns such corruption simply implodes. So far as I’m concerned the big hurdle is the fact that such accounts are always kept under wraps; only the loser stories are considered worthy of publicity.
Nemesis
Its a ‘brotherhood’ and those who call themselves a “police officer” and stay silent are not police. It is a despicable and an abomination to stay silent over premeditated murder and cover up by the whole police. Surely the Police Commissioner would have also known what is going on.
I would like to know more of the 7 ASIO operatives that were murdered as well.
Arlyn, yes, nearly all organizations are Janus in makeup – the lower levels or the ‘public face’, simply being the ‘shop front’ for the higher level/s agenda that marries into the Global agenda.
Terry, your script is a great way to get the real story out. Thanks for putting the time and effort into it.
Mal, if only some producer had the courage to put together a project, Dee could clean up the draft (she has some dynamite ideas, the first scene cracked me up with the doctors and MSM hacks in Hobart all trying to get booked in for the weekend – classic!)
With a full length movie the entirety of the evidence can be reveled without interruption. No idiots asking stupid questions, no personal insults (how do you insult a movie?), no deflections off into LaLa land – the information just flows straight into their consciousness.
Once you know the truth, you can’t un-know it.
Meetings in just over a month
Tried J. P. F. O. ? After all “only a Jew can criticise a Jew without being labelled anti-semitic”(round 3m):
This topic about ‘gun massacres’ is such a big topic nowadays, whether in Oz, or NZ, the U.S., Europe – you would think that such a film would have a large audience available. Crikey, how many people would see it and then tell their friends to see it – just in the U.S. The more the MSM panned it, the more interest it would stir just to see what it was all about.
It shows how scared the producers are that they shy away from it.
HHA (Heavy Hearts Anonymous):
Attorney-General George Brandis has commended Senate President Stephen Parry for his service after he announced he will resign upon confirming he has dual citizenship.
Updated Updated 1 November 2017
By Louise Cheer
Senate President Stephen Parry will resign after the UK Home Office confirmed he is a British citizen.
Senator Parry revealed on Tuesday he may be a dual citizenship as his father was born in the UK. He confirmed this was the case on Wednesday.
Senator Parry said he would be submitting his resignation as Senate president and Senator for Tasmania to the Governor-General on Wednesday.
“With a heavy heart I inform you that I have received advice from the British Home Office that I am a British citizen by virtue of my father’s birthplace, thereby being a dual citizen under the provisions of the Australian Constitution,” Senator Parry said in a statement.
No politician at present is eligible to sit in parliament.
Section 44 and Section 46;
Item (9).
.
44. Any person who–
(i. ) Is under any acknowledgment of allegiance, obedience, or adherence to a foreign power, or is a subject or a citizen or entitled to the rights or privileges of a subject or citizen of a foreign power:
The RBA is a foreign power. The UN Charter was signed in full by PM Ford.
The Australian government takes out overseas Bank loans ( The borrower is servant to the lender ).
PROTOCOL No. 20
TYRANNY OF USURY
So long as loans were internal the GOYIM only shuffled their money from the pockets of the poor to those of the rich, but when we bought up the necessary person in order to transfer loans into the external sphere, all the wealth of States flowed into our cash- boxes and all the GOYIM began to pay us the tribute of subjects
According to Wikipedia:
.
“Parry was born on 31 October 1960 in Burnie, Tasmania, to William Stephen Parry and Patricia Dawn Evans. He was educated at Burnie’s Marist Regional College after which he enrolled at the Tasmanian Police Academy in Hobart.
.
Parry was employed as an officer with the Tasmanian Police from 1977 to 1986, and was promoted to Detective in 1983. After leaving the police force, he completed a certificate in Mortuary Science at the Australian College of Funeral Service, and was a funeral director from 1986 to 2004, becoming president of the Australian Funeral Directors Association. Parry was also president of the Burnie Chamber of Commerce and Industry from 2000 to 2004, and a director of the Tasmanian Chamber of Commerce and Industry from 2000 to 2005.”
.
In 2004, Parry was elected to the Australian Senate for the State of Tasmania as a member of the Liberal Party.
.
Senator Parry was eminently qualified to lead the embalming team and as such his published comments would have to be accurate.
.
On February 26 he was emailed a ‘Show Cause’ notice by Keith Noble who accused the Senate Leader of having prior knowledge of the tragedy.
.
As of going to print Mr Noble says he has had no acknowledgement or reply from senator Parry.
.
Cairns News emailed senator Parry’s office with a copy of the notice but he had not responded at the time of going to print……………..”
.
https://cairnsnews.org/2016/03/06/startling-new-information-proves-port-arthur-massacre-was-planned-by-government-2/
.
Eureka –
“…………….What we had at Publicdebate.com was an admission that Jean-George Estiot aka Joe Vialls was at Hobart on the evening of the Port Arthur Massacre, and as there was no way for any person to decide to visit Hobart via aeroplane immediately after the news of the massacre broke, as all commercial travel was totally booked out, Joe Vialls had to have been in Hobart prior to the massacre.
However it was not until the ‘Shooters News website identified Joe Vialls as one of the three men on the Broad Arrow Cafe balcony shortly after the massacre that we were able to identify Joe Vialls as the Intelligence officer who was in charge of the psy-ops. By July 2001 the Port Arthur Forum on Publicdebate.com had closed down due to ‘lack of public interest’……….”
http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=81545
Good luck, I hope they have bigger cajones than the Australian legal profession.
I just watched the video Expose EP1 Justice in the Lucky Country which views many Americans in the so-called ‘justice system’.
Australia has the same ‘conditions’ as the US in the suppression of evidence, doctoring of evidence and facts, doctoring of images, police corruption and lies with at times an inept forensic report/s or destruction of evidence, a corrupt Bar system, corrupt government officials, a corrupt media and press that intentionally spread lies, misinformation and disinformation to the public at random with complete impunity! We are living in a police state or police nation already with sedition and High Treason!
I know because I have been involved with the Royal Commission into the Lindy Chamberlain case as the state representative for South Australia. I was especially picked by Betty Hocking who was a member of the House of Assembly in Canberra. I was the the president of the Vietnam Veterans Association for 2 years in the Vietnam Veterans Royal Commission into Chemical Defoliants Agent Orange where I researched, collated and presented evidence to the Royal commission in South Australia where the Federal government tried to hide, coverup, mask and suppress evidence and at times lied. I was involved in the Splatt case and the Perry poison case in South Australia where eventually all were freed.
There are a number of other cases in all states and territories as well that I don’t have to mention.
Governments are simply acting like criminal syndicates or criminal consortiums at the expense of the taxpayer which is a double insult to injury. There are not the proper checks and balances in the Westminster system. Those checks and balances that are there are not being utilised for the Common Good. Our Common Good not their common good of deceit, deception and sedition against the Australian constitution and Australians as whole.https://duckduckgo.com/?q=governments+are+criminal+syndicates&t=opera&ia=web
Corporate Australia
A look into Corporate fraud in Australia, Stranglehold of Monopolies, Telecommunications Oppression, Biased Law System, Corporate influence in politics, Industrial Relations disadvantaging workers, Outsourcing Australian Jobs, Offshore Banking, Petrochemical company domination, Invisibly Visible. It’s not what you see, it’s what goes on behind the scenes.
http://corpau.blogspot.com
https://realnewsaustralia.com/2016/04/24/1973-the-birth-of-corporate-australia/
Kangaroo Court of Australia
https://kangaroocourtofaustralia.com
Well: politicians, shock jokes, ABC and MSM fakes; seen the short film above?
No questions? All happy little vegemite’s?
Happy that an innocent man could be existing under such cruelty and alone in prison.
‘F. wits”!
Never ever serve on a criminal jury …………… you do not have the intellect to even think of any evidence that may be tendered or spoken.
Arlyn, your second paragraph in your last comment, sums up the Port Arthur incident completely.
Arrogant politicians, arrogant police commissioners arrogant police officers, arrogant lawyers and judge. Completely evil!!
“arrogant”??? Nah, just plainly: a evil lot of greedy dumb Psychos with their fake ‘prestituted’ running dogs on their side with their snouts in the trough for advertising revenue and a regular massage from the Mockingbird controllers. (As in operation mockingbird …)
Yes thanks for you shift Arlyn,
really this is so difficult, we know, you sharping the quill is good work.
cudos
justthinkin….
all us 2 week , u know
that stanford experience
Stanford,
detainers/ guards / silly infference here
but …
Of general topical interest
Interview: Brenton Sanderson with Dr. Kevin MacDonald
I really do fail to see how repeating the “we’ve been betrayed” mantra could possibly free anyone of anything. No significant change of any sort has ever been known to take place save by personal revelation as to how/why one was deceived in the 1st place: I realise that that’s not a comfortable process but there really is no other way of taking authority over anything.
Berry
Very true indeed!
This is where people are required to become patriotic towards their country to take a stand when governments become tyrannical, murderous, deceitful, dishonest, conniving, seditious, and traitors to Australia and to the Australian Constitution.
Other wise people have already ‘surrendered’ to the Communist UN mandate that is supported by the evil Zionists, the Roman Catholic-Church-State and the globalists for global control.
The whole concept of entitlement needs to be ousted by the principle of obligation. Getting a grip on the fact that the former was never intended to do anything but enslave is critical.Any beggar can be turned into a King simply by replacing “the right to a fair trial” with a duty to broadcast the truth to the best of his/her ability.
COMMENT RE “A QUESTION OF GUILT” DOCO LINKED BY DIANNE:
Very interesting to see that a number of the early MSM reports did, in fact, acknowledge that all was not well within their own ranks or the justice system. That’s exactly what I’ve observed 1st hand re divers court cases:A flash-in-the pan “oops we’ve mucked up badly”or “what the hell is going on” is ALWAYS followed by a swift, totally unexplained emphatic denial coupled with palpable discomposure. ALWAYS AND ALWAYS.
Does make you wonder
Today, the excellent Paul Craig Roberts recommends an encyclopedia that is not Wikpedia: but its article on Port Arthur is farcical.
Strange:
https://infogalactic.com/info/Port_Arthur_massacre_(Australia)
The info galactic article is copied direct from Wikipedia.