by Dee McLachlan
Several mainstream news organisations have been running with a story about a supposed time traveller. This, from The Sun, is a typical report:
“A MAN who claims he’s from the year 2030 reportedly passed a lie detector test – and made a series of startling predictions for humanity. The self-styled time-traveller, who calls himself Noah, begged to stay anonymous claiming he could be assassinated for revealing what the future holds.”
Noah, whose face is always blurred, goes on about what future looks like: a second term of Trump, and more robots, Google glasses, and self-driving cars. Yeah!
Okay, enough of that. I’m going no further. This article is to comment on the mainstream media’s INABILITY to analyse a simple photograph.
Now Noah is shown holding a picture taken in 5000 of Los Angeles underwater (seen above). You see the surface of the water, then a submerged city below — and the photograph is looking down at a “city” from very high up. Well, please! For this to be a true photographic representation of a city underwater, then the visibility would have to be about 2,000 meters or more.
We all know that visibility on a good day underwater is maybe 60 to 80m — as in the example below of a shipwreck in the Red Sea. The distance that you can see in perfectly clear water depends on the intensity of the light, as blue light is reduced by 90 per cent over a distance of 230m. And it would be almost pitch black down there (with no defined shadows).
The many outlets of the mainstream media writing long articles about Noah (Edward) the time traveler, FAIL to make the most obvious observation — that the photograph of Los Angeles submerged, is an impossible representation.
They have lost any ability to analyse anything it seems.
Is “climate change” now seeking reliance on lunatic-fringe, conspiracy-theories for its viability?
I guess the MSM has simply been set up by someone who wanted to make a point.
Very valuable exercise I must say
Pretty easy to manipulate any bastion of power when you think about it
Oh?
I want to see what the ABCs Jonathon Faine in Melbourne thinks of the story……. he claimes to have an intellect competent at examing evidence like the freefall collapse of building No 7 in 6.5 seconds on 911.
Paul Barry might like a shot too.
Barry did give it a go…
http://www.abc.net.au/mediawatch/transcripts/s4805874.htm
No mention of the photo.
He trashes this story in the same manner as he would a 9-11 truther.
Let’s be fair, Dee. At least Media Watch said this:
“So if the Australian media is ever short of story, they know where to look. Which brings us back to Studio 10 and Natarsha Belling, who finally confessed that the story of “Noah” the time traveller was a heap of junk but, hey, still worthy of discussion:
NATARSHA BELLING: Now, despite this clearly being completely fake, it begs the question: should we pay any attention to people who claim they can see the future?
— Channel Ten, Studio 10, 15 February, 2018
“Short answer, no: And also, no to giving credence to stories that are ridiculous and fake.”
Mary,
If you had ever experienced it you would believe that some people can see an individual’s future decades before the events.
I have had over 50 years experiencing it.
With my African upbringing I tend to agree with you Ned — about seeing into the future. There is so much of our reality that we don’t understand.
I deliberately did not comment on “time travel” — I have no ability to assess that. But we can determine that the photo is fake and then this trashes Noah’s credibility. He’s the perfect disinfo guy to put out there if it was real.
That link also raises an interesting question: why the need to comment on a transparent heist ?
Excuse me if I already told this in a Comment: I met a school teacher in UA who said he overheard an 8th grader say “Yes but that’s legitimate fake news.”
But he does not know what the kid was referring to.
It’s called FALSE NEWS. Anyone who has eve spent time underwater in the ocean would recognise this immediately.
Michael Jackson, eat your heart out:
.
Not to mention the kelp forest that would be growing there and those buildings would be covered with abs,
I don’t think Steve Irwin was killed by a stingray, but Her Bossness does not want me to write about it as I cannot pwove it.
.
M, you can write it up… but I have no reason to disbelieve the close crew that was with him… and the detail of the account.
I know many wildlife photographers. My friend JV was mauled by a tiger. Another bitten countless times by snakes — nearly died. Others had very close misses. They filming dangerous animals all the time.
Okay Africa again. There are fantastic stories of people surviving wild animals. One game ranger was in the early 1900s attacked by a buffalo, and landed up at the top of a thorn tree. Another, Wolhuter, was mauled by a lion, Dragged along between the lions leg, and used a small knife to save himself.
M, Bindi looks like a ‘clump’ compared to these two
(seeing that it is the winter Olympics)
*https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hO2xBr5EmSo
or these two
*https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QLYnYQc-qso
Are you baiting me, Boss?
I don’t think it’s fair to call someone a clump because they have less than an hourglass figure. Bindi did fantastically well in all the types of dances, winning the main prize that year (if I remember correctly). Allegedly she had only started to learn the skill a few months before!
Is that possible or not? I assume she is “brain enhanced.” Do we want to go there, Dee?
Mind-control victim Cathy Morgan has gone very far to explain brain enhancement. I have faith in her, so will post one of her hour-long sessions soon.
But first I show the skaters (Dee, did you realize that by putting an asterisk in front of the link it does not open?)
While watching these persons do a perfect job you may wonder if all perfect singers, athletes, etc., have been brain enhanced. I used to wonder that about Maria Callas.
This is pure distraction, and marks how far the media have fallen. To see it best illustrated, watch if you can stomach it one of those commercial channel Morning shows where in news terms a skanky celebritiy’s new arse-tattoo receives news equivalence with a Syrian suburb being bombed out. Its all about blurring the lines.