Home Port Arthur Pauline Hanson Is On The Money Regarding Port Arthur Massacre

Pauline Hanson Is On The Money Regarding Port Arthur Massacre

120
Pauline Hansen quoting Barrie Unsworth (screengrab)

Introduction by Dee McLachlan

Al Jazeera approached the ABC about a documentary on One Nation, and the ABC acquired the broadcast rights, airing the second part tonight. There are two aspects with regards to the Al-Jazeera exposé on One Nation. The first is about meeting with the National Rifle Association (NRA) to discuss their public relations strategy. But I’m not going to discuss that.

More important is the part of this story about Pauline Hanson questioning the Port Arthur massacre. Thank goodness some politicians are thinking and analyzing the logic of that event.

The Guardian wrote:

“One Nation leader tells al-Jazeera reporter there are ‘a lot of questions’ about 1996 attack…Pauline Hanson questions Port Arthur massacre in secret recording… [and] implied that the 1996 Port Arthur massacre was a government conspiracy.

Barrie Unsworth at Finger Wharf, Sydney, 1987 (adapted photo – Fairfax)

Then Pauline then talked about Barrie Unsworth:

An MP said it would actually take a massacre in Tasmania to change the gun laws in Australia,’ Hanson told the al-Jazeera reporter Rodger Muller. ‘Haven’t you heard that? Have a look at it. It was said on the floor of parliament. I’ve read a lot and I have read the book on it, Port Arthur. A lot of questions there’.

Interestingly, many came out to defend the government conspiracy. To continue with the Guardian:

“The comments provoked fury from Labor and the Greens, who renewed calls for the Coalition to repudiate One Nation by preferencing the far-right party last…

And the prime minister:

‘The linkages to Port Arthur, I’m sure all Australians would be shocked about,’  Morrison said.

Yes Sir, Australians would be shocked, not at Pauline’s view, but if they really understood and were told what happened that day in 1996. So today might a good day to remind Australians of the details of the false flag. I am re-posting an article (28 April 2018) by Malcolm R Hughes. He is a regular contributor to Gumshoe and has done his citizen’s duty for many years in trying to inform government officials about the truth of the port Arthur massacre.

Getting Ready for the Port Arthur Massacre

by Malcolm R Hughes

I do not have any new data or Insider secrets, but there is much on the record that can help us reconstruct. Without doubt the massacre was a major undertaking. Who organized it? I present a conservative accounting as to how much was involved in ready-ing  for the event.

Three Meetings That Required Advance Bookings

As is well known, there were three meetings going on that day that helped the right people be where they would be needed.

  1. There was a conference of surgeons, from around Australia, at Royal Hobart Hospital, which finished at 1pm. on Sunday April 28 – 30 minutes before the shooting began at the Port Arthur Historic Site (hereinafter the PAHS).
  1. There was an international gathering of media people at a hotel in Hobart. The attendees were just settling in on Sunday for the start of their conference, on Monday morning.
  1. There was a meeting of staff members of the PAHS, particularly top management at Swansea. It was to be a two day seminar, starting Sunday 28th April. Ten in number, left PAHS two hours before the massacre started.

So far I have not said anything about a conspiracy. But I have had much experience with officials over the last ten years – mainly writing to them (right up to the Governor General) and logging their resolute non-replies, so you can be sure I do think it was officialdom that ran the entire event.

In this article I will not speculate as to exactly whodunnit. Nor will I make any effort to argue for the innocence of Martin Bryant – that should be clear from the mere fact that one ordinary person could not have managed all the complications of the day.

Back to the planning. It is likely that the purpose of Meeting 1 was to have an extra supply of surgeons at hand in case there was a sudden population of wounded, not killed, victims. The meeting in Royal Hobart Hospital made that possible. Such meetings always require the attendees to register well in advance. There is standardly a fee, so the bank accounts or credit card accounts for the doctors would reveal the date on which they paid their registration.

Meeting 2 would also have called for rego in advance. Since the majority of journalists and editors attending were from overseas, there must be records showing how far in advance they arranged their travel to Australia. (It is not my job to trace them; I am making the point that much advance planning went into it.)

Meeting 3, by contrast, did not provide a supply of needed persons. Rather, it provided us with a non-supply of the key group of people — the managers of the PAHS. Unprecedentedly, they held a meeting (with no known agenda) at a location 2 hours’ drive from Port Arthur, in Swansea.

By virtue of missing out on the action at PAHS, these personnel were spared from later having to give testimony as to what they saw, and of course they were spared from getting shot at.

There was yet another move to “get inconvenient personnel out of the way,” but it could have been arranged mere days in advance so I don’t include it in my list of advance-planning.  But I will mention it — namely, the “white powder affair.”

Notice of a drug situation came through on the police phone. This had the effect of causing two local cops to have to drive far north on the Tasman peninsula at around 1:00pm and thus be unavailable to respond in a timely way to the activity at PAHS. I assume the drug thing was a hoax — when the constables got there they found only white powder.

Three Preparations for Body-Handling

The following three things seem ludicrously revelatory of “malice aforethought,” yet they have not had any effect on bringing the murderers to justice.

  1. A mortuary truck was purchased in 1995 . And it was later offered for sale on the internet in 1998. It was capable of carrying 22 deceased persons. The purchaser was not exactly the government. It was a private contractor, Ray Charlton for Southern Districts Mortuary Services. Who was he to predict the (potential) need for such a thing? No other state in Australia had a similar vehicle.
  1. As is openly revealed in the “Port Arthur Seminar Papers,” published in 1997, embalmers prepared, in advance, a large supply of embalming equipment and transported it to Tasmania from the Victorian funeral company, Nelson Brothers. The author of that seminar paper was Stephen Parry. Researcher Keith Noble subsequently composed a “show cause” notice to Parry as to why he should not be charged with fore-knowledge of the massacre.
  1. There is also said to have been an extra supply of helicopters and pilots-on-call for that Sunday, where there would normally be none or very few. They were utilised both to transport inspectors to the site, once the shooting ended around 1:50pm, and to carry some of the wounded to hospital. A good question is: who arranged for those pilots? 

Two Big Adjustments in the Political Situation

  1. A federal election eight weeks before the massacre (March 2, 1996) brought John Howard into the prime ministership – ousting Paul Keating. Howard then arranged for a buyback of guns from the populace, in less than a fortnight after the massacre.
  1. Also, six weeks before the event, Ray Groom stepped down as premier of Tasmania – no reason given – and instead took over the portfolios that would give him control of the aftermath of the massacre, including Attorney General and Minister of Justice, Tourism and Workplace Safety.

Three Lesser Adjustments

  1. The State Government of Tasmania purchased the Broad Arrow Café from its private owner, Jim Laycock, one year in advance of the massacre. This went against the trend: government owned properties were being privatised. Was there any rationale presented for this purchase?
  1. Workmen’s Compensation provisions were changed by Premier Ray Groom in 1995 to eliminate coverage for Post-traumatic Stress Disorder. Of course, many employees at PAHS wanted to sue for benefits for the PTSD they acquired on the job on April 28, 1996, but could not.
  1. A change in the Coroner’s Act had been made by the Tasmanian Parliament and given the Royal Assent on November 14, 1995, but it had a delayed effective date of February 1, 1997. Therefore, when Coroner Ian Matterson aborted his inquest in December 1996 (becuase Bryant had pleaded Guilty) the law that was still in force was the 1957 Coroners Act whose Section 22 provided that a coroner could not make a finding that conflicted with a plea of Guilty.

A Mystery: the Prediction of a Massacre in Tassie by a NSW Premier

  1. As is often mentioned (on the Internet) as proof that there was a conspiracy to have a massacre at Port Arthur, Barrie Unsworth, premier of New South Wales said – way back in 1987, “There will never be uniform gun laws in Australia until we see a massacre in Tasmania”. Stated at a conference in Hobart.  Either he had a crystal ball, or was in-the-know. Or, conceivably he made a random choice a state to name – Tassie.

Recap

To recapitulate, a dozen odd things can be listed as reasonable indicators of forward planning of the Port Arthur massacre.

Three meetings that day: surgeons, media people, and PAHS personnel.

Three preparations for body-handling: purchase of a mortuary truck, preparation of a large embalming supply, and the arranging for extra helicopters and pilots that day.

Two big adjustments in the political situation: a federal  election that brought John Howard into the prime ministership, and a voluntary stepping down by Ray Groom as premier of Tasmania.

Three lesser adjustments: the purchase by government of the privately owned Broad Arrow Café, the change in Workers Compo to eliminate PTSD coverage, and a change in the Coroner’s Act to restrict a coroner’s scope.

The mystery of the prescience of Barrie Unsworth.

Everything I have listed is open-source knowledge. I have refrained from discussing many other factors that suggest forward planning, in hopes of making this list clean and incontestable. I do not claim that it PROVES that someone planned the massacre (or who that someone is), but it is extremely good evidence that the massacre was planned in advance.

To argue that the massacre was not planned you would have to be willing to say that each one of the 12 items is only a coincidence, and that the conjunction of all 12 of them is mere chance.


UPDATE: A comment in the Herald Sun (29/3/2019) demonstrates how analytic or critical thinking is no longer a consideration.

SHARE

120 COMMENTS

  1. Go, Mal. Go, Pauline.

    Always a good sign when Pauline comes under attack. Indicates she is a real threat for the Federal Election.

    How could she not be? But I am worried about the tick bite she has recently acquired.

    • It was always clear to me –even back in 1996 that Pauline was to be a John Howard “patsy “or” pasty” as keeps popping up when I write–Mary you know more of this tick bite me thinks–it comes back to mind control–changing ones mind remotely– you felt some “understanding /empathy” with Pell — I believe, despite some reservation, the “I” can do the same with Pauline. Look at her wikipedia profile.

    • The Internet Has Its Own Shadowy Deep Statehttps://thecommonsenseshow.com/conspiracy/internet-has-its-own-shadowy-deep-state

      It talks about The New Zealand false flag and cutting off of the Mike Adams link to the video shown. Mike Adams the Health Ranger is ex military.

  2. She has today, changed her mind (if she’s got one) , and says Bryant should have got the death sentence. (she may be Prime Minister soon)

    But can I draw peoples attention to the quality of the spy camera work in ABC’s ‘How To Sell A Massacre’ . So many cameras from so many angles, so close to the subjects and such good quality (mostly) that ‘I smell a rat’ !

    I have always had a suspicion that One Nation only exists to make the Liberal/Labor/Green coalition look less right wing.

    • I see what you mean. ABC said:

      “One Nations James Ashby and Steve Dickson, a One Nation candidate in the 2019 Australian federal election, were recorded seeking up to $US20 million for their election war chest while promising to soften Australian gun laws.”

      That is like Elizabeth Warren saying when she is US president she will change certain laws. As president she cannot change laws. Neither can a sole senator in Canberra soften a gun law.

      Soppy, sloppy, sloppy, ABC.

      • “She has today, changed her mind (if she’s got one)” Gary P–checkout Tavistock Agenda 2012–Dr Rawlings Rees–Psychological Warfare Department– Fiona Barnett Steve Mc Murray Report : MK Ultra Australia and Mary W Maxwell”s — “Deliverance”.
        Dax: Trist: Bowlby: Sargant: Dick: LSD Leucotomies, experiments –Tavistock Nodes.–and on and on.

      • The ABC is always biased with all the rest of the Propagandists media.
        I would like to think that Ida Buttrose will change that if anyone can get her ear

    • Great idea, Terry. This morning Channel 9 said “the damaging scandal is driving scores of One Nation voters away.”

      I guess that’s a typo for “This scandal is damaging — it is driving scores of voters to One Nation.”

      • Dee’s video–brilliant-when I first saw it and again now– I might say, as an expert on this — Martin Bryant- has DID– Dissociative Identity Disorder-also I believe he has been subjected to RAMCOA–ritual abuse-mind control- organised abuse–and I add experiments and MK-ULTRA “programming’.

    • Terry – maybe it’s time to get Pauline up to speed! Send her the video – perhaps she can then retract her comments about Martin Bryant deserving the death penalty?!! unless this has already been done? it may crack a window that opens people’s eyes to the insidious corruption. We need a “Trump card” – could this be a start?

  3. There is not a lot I agree with in One Nation policies, but on this subject, Port Arthur the cover up is palpable, I hope this matter gains momentum and becomes an election issue and exposes the criminality of our Traitorous Governments.

  4. Martin Bryant shot nobody. The real shooters have been identified on http://www.cairnsnews.org in the Port Arthur files. Again nobody was killed at Christchurch, certainly not in the amateurish video taken in the mosque which intelligence services released online. Ad infinitum. The real villains here are the major media. The ABC producers should be prosecuted and jailed and the $1B organisation disbanded and sold and the executives of the private networks prosecuted and jailed.

      • “Fast trial. Death Penalty.”

        Where have we heard that before? Oh that’s right.

        Donald Trump talking about the Perverts kidnapping “chidlren”

        • Maybe you should be looking over all those that have already been locked up, especially re: NXVIM? I think that is how they spell it? I guess we could dig up Michael Jackson’s body and hang it out to dry?

          And those perverts are doing more to children than just kidnapping them.

  5. We got a front seat to the Black Magic yesterday as the MSM harassed Australia to be afraid of questions and Pauline fell into line and genuflected to power while defending her incompetent associates who never fail to give her bad advice.
    Pauline could have addressed Port Arthur honestly but she has just contributed to smashing the integrity of those who are politically honest.
    This is a controlling game of managing the public dissent of the establishment.
    Pauline Hanson and Fraser Anning are burning up the energy of people with good intentions but they never explain the full political dynamic and Anning is an open avowed Zionist.
    Trump in the US is a manifestation of the same deception game as his following strengthens and he openly advances the Zionist monopoly agenda in the Middle East and threatens war with Venezuela.
    The establishment are afraid of the awakening against their crimes of power but they are implementing the necessary ingredients to misdirect the mob.
    How tragic to view a clip of Pauline defending her Port Arthur questions.
    https://www.facebook.com/theboltreport/videos/2299171930361586/

      • Bolt works for Murdoch – his tongue and his hands are tied, but he is way more conservative and a wake up these days to what is actually occurring, than he once was.

        • Yes I ask –and know -who is Bolt– in 2000 and something I stood on the steps of the GPO Melbourne and spoke about Howard’s Intervention– and the closing down of bilingual education programs–a pre cursor to the current widening of the gap. There were many other very articulate speakers on the steps that day–it was followed by a march and a sit down on the streets- I found this man kept coming into my field –walking with me chatting with me– Wanting to be “educated by me” afterwards buying me a coffee–he gave me his card–Andrew Bolt –part of the program.

          • Diane, it will be interesting to see what becomes of Bolt when the MSM finally collapse into the dustbin of history.

      • The sinister agenda of seizing guns from law abiding citizens by any way or means by state-sponsored terrorism is the first priority.

        The second priority is Censorship and suppression of material. Im sure more draconian laws will be put in place already ‘drafted’ to restrict the public from discussing or reviewing any material or images from the ‘New Zealand massacre’ or any other controversial subject of believing the “official story” no matter what. Both countries will move in that direction however Australia is well ahead as it has already ‘surrendered” to the dark forces of the Communist UN.

        If I was the Prime Minister I would pull out of the UN. Why does any country financially and politically support a Communist organisation that countries have went to war for decades and lost its own in the process?
        “Capitalists” and the Communist Dimension
        http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/un_exposed/un_exposed04.htm

        THE UN IS COMMUNIST
        http://www.unwatch.com/un_communist.shtml

        The UN_American United Nations
        http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/un/unamerican.htm#.VD2jGs015NU
        A. The UN’s Founders were known Communists
        The U.N. Deception 46 min 58 sec://www.crossroad.to/Excerpts/chronologies/un.htm it’s true that the personality, purpose, and accomplishments of an organization are highly affected by its leadership, then membership in the United Nations spelled trouble from the start. Of the 17 individuals identified by the US State Department as having helped shape US policy leading to the creation of the United Nations, all but one were later identified as secret members of the Communist Party USA (3).

        Joining them at the UN’s founding conference were 43 members of the ultra influential, ultra pro-socialist, globalist think-tank the Council On Foreign Relations, (6 of the 43 CFR members having the additional distinction of membership in the Communist Party USA) (4). And, importantly, the UN’s first Secretary General and orchestrator of the San Francisco conference was the man later convicted as a Soviet agent – Alger Hiss (5)

        The UN is a Communist Organisation
        http://therainmanperspective.blogspot.com.au/2012/05/united-nations-is-communist.html

        A Chronology of the UN The Revolutionary Steps to Global Tyranny
        http://www.crossroad.to/Excerpts/chronologies/un.htm

        Habitat II The UN Plan for Global Settlements
        http://www.crossroad.to/text/articles/hab2.html

        The Truth About the United Nations
        http://www.apfn.org/apfn/un.htm
        The U.N. Deception 46 min 58 sec

    • So, because Anning supports the state of Israel his views on where this country is going wrong must be discounted? Is that what you are implying?

      Have you read Annings ‘open letter to P. M. Morrison over at Pickering Post?

      Anning is an Australian Patriot who is not afraid to call out those who need to be called out and that is all that should matter to those of us who want their country back.

      • One of the most powerful political monopoly forces and factors in human affairs is Zionism, their Israel project and all the associated black arts controlling strategies inclusive in this whole grubby affair by way of deception.
        I can not judge Fraser Annings motivation or real awareness regards his stated allegiance to the Zionist policy but I can predict the results will not advance truth and just genuine peace and prosperity for mankind.
        The monopoly policies that include high immigration to Australia are a consequence of a planned program that involves deceptions of many black magic flavours, plus trade and military wars, that are designed and implemented by agencies and people that Fraser Anning has never, and will never, speak, evidence or explain.
        Like Hanson, Anning is the useful and tolerable controlled opposition who will never expose the full power dynamic of the world.
        Try questioning the Hanson or Anning camp with the expectation of critical facts and evidence and you will soon see the problem.
        Of course some of their statements and policy ambitions are sound and I support all things that are sound but that is a different matter to judging the value of these particular political phenomena.
        It is not beyond remote possibilities that something unrehearsed that is a genuine threat to monopoly power could evolve from these camps but events this week are the manifestation of that witching controlling method.

      • Christopher, Zionism is another Janus institution, much like the Roman Catholic Church or the Free Masons – one part, which is the public aspect, is for the ‘common good’ while the higher part, is in place for a more malevolent agenda.

        One could also explore the Jesuits – the first ‘institution’ to experiment with communism in Paraguay back in the 17th Century.

        I could go on exposing so many of our public institutions that have at least two faces, some have more that, and on their ‘track record’, appear to be non-aligned with what you may believe, but when explored fully, they are all marching to the same drum.

        As for Hanson and Anning, who speak their minds – not always a wise move in today’s Truth becomes a revolutionary ideal setting – if they are uttering falsehoods or, in your opinion, disinformation, then why do they resonate with so many who are already awake to how this world operates?

        And they resonate most loudly with me.

        • I only wish I new how to break the spell that captures people with good intentions and runs them down a road to no where and often into a brick wall.
          It is largely a question of memory, breadth, precision and discipline in thinking and calculating information and action.
          How could any thinking person not recognize the deep problems in the One Nation camp with the recent revelations and dramatic contradictions in their private and public face.
          They accept the force that controls their problems instead of fully challenging, exposing, explaining and confronting.
          This is what the love of earthly wealth and power does to all of us if we are not careful.
          The monopoly cabal well understand they cannot control all people and information but they must intimidate well enough to keep those who have genuine knowledge silent in fear of the social and political retribution and crucifixion.

          • Christopher, One Nation’s problem has always been Pauline Hanson’s public persona – she does not perform well under aggressive media assaults, and as a result, makes many errors.

            She is not a big thinker on her feet.

            I will predict that One Nation’s NSW branch with Mark Latham as leader, and now a member of the Legislative Council, will eventually supplant Hanson’s leadership role as national leader – she will still be there, but Latham will do all the talking when the need to front the hostile media is taken.

            In your poor assessment of what One Nation is all about, you seem to have forgotten that it has only been One Nation and Pauline Hanson in particular, who have been calling out our problems for over two decades.

            I wonder if you believe that there are other political parties out there who have never had their own internal problems?

        • Nemesis
          You and others who read these small books will get a revelation in what is happening and who is behind it all. If countries do not come to grips of who is behind all of this chaos, murder, deception then they are just blowing in the wind…People must read and get away from the box of propaganda to start to critically be able to analysis.

          The Enemy Unmasked
          https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B2nmi6r-BcI3MnR3bVkzeFh4eDQ/edit

          The Secret Terrorists
          http://pdf.amazingdiscoveries.org/Conspiracy_Theories/The%20Secret%20Terrorists.pdf

          The Footprint of the Jesuits http://wwfar.com/crosstheborder/Footprints%20of%20the%20Jesuits.pdf

          Foreign Conspiracy Against the Liberties of the United States
          http://pdf.amazingdiscoveries.org/eBooks/Foreign_Conspiracy_Against_the_Liberties_of_USA.pdf (It is not just against the US it is against us all)

          “Ravening Wolves” by Monica Farrell
          http://www.jamesjpn.net/roman-catholicism/ravening-wolves-by-monica-farrell/

          • I have been following the program ‘Hunting Hitler’ and they found that he and a number of other Nazi soldiers were helped by the Roman Catholic Church-State by their ‘Ratlines’ and tunnels.

            Hitler ended up in Spain as Spain was ‘supposed’ to be neutral in a massive church in Samos with eye witnesses, Nazi soldiers buried on the grounds. General Franco was Roman Catholic

            The Roman Catholic Church-State has declared that is is nearest to Fascism that is why this evil organisation supported Hitler and Mussolini. It is well documented but they like to play it down or deny it by some lame excuse.

            There are many photos showing the Pope Pius, ex Pope Ratzinger and others with the Nazis. The Vatican and the Papacy have many archives that are hidden and refuse to open them for scrutiny.

            Hitlers Pope
            https://www.amazon.com/Hitlers-Pope-Secret-History-Pius/dp/014311400X
            https://www.vanityfair.com/style/1999/10/pope-pius-xii-199910?verso=true

            General Franco: “Hitler fought for Christianity in Europe”https://ivarfjeld.com/2011/12/12/general-franco-hitler-fought-for-christianity-in-europe/

            The Mitharism pagan sun-god religion of the Latin Roman Church-State is not a Christian organisation. Franco murdered for those who would not convert to Catholicism!

            When the people of Spain resisted the fascist takeover, Pius XI spoke out strongly, calling everyone who was not a fascist a Bolshevik, and blessing “all those who have taken the difficult and dangerous task to defend and reinstate the honor of God and Religion.”

            The Holocaust, in its most general sense, began in Spain. During the Civil War people were murdered by Franco’s troops simply for not being Catholic. After Franco’s victory priests made lists of citizens who did not attend mass. They were rounded up for questioning and, often, execution. Hitler’s concentration camps, after 1939, evolved into Spanish-style death camps that liquidated not only Communists, but the Catholic Church’s ancient enemies, the Jews.
            As good Catholics they were all Papal soldiers, serving the head of the Catholic religion.

            The reformers of the Church called the Pope an “anti-Christ”. They were right. And the Church of anti-Christ will bring the final lawless anti-Messiah into the arena in Jerusalem.

            The fog of war is all about the counter-reformation by the Jesuits to bring in this sinister organisation as the NWR religion as well to amass great amounts of wealth by theft, murder and drug distribution with the laundry of money through the Vatican in the $billions

          • Arlyn, look up the youtube program, Shark Hunters, that provides much detail on Hitler’s last years in Argentina and Paraguay.

            As for what controls this world and has done so for a very long time – only those who are willing to accept our spirituallty and survival after death, will gain from venturing down all those rabbit holes.

            Trump knows what has been controlling this world for a very long time.

  6. If someone who’d never heard of the P. A. massacre were to ask me “what exactly was it ?” I’d tell ’em “an end-of year/Christmas-type party”.

    The time for influencing the course of history is as soon as a certain direction appears on the horizon. At the point where licensing laws of any sort are proposed those affected need to sit down and ask “what are the implications? what’s the potential end-game?” and then take the appropriate measures. Obsessing over who organised a victory ceremony that took place 23 years ago is nothing more than a form of distraction.

    • Berry, raising past issues to analyse why they occurred is not in the category of obsession or distraction, but within the realm of exploring and then exposing, an agenda that has been a long time in planning, and that must be confronted if we are to have any control whatsoever over our future as a species on this planet.

      • I agree that political manoeuvring can be predicted and therefore stymied by studying previous inventories. In the case of P. A. there’s only a patchy record, but even if the whole story was blown wide open for all the World to see it wouldn’t make a toot of difference. That’s because the respective firearms restrictions were set in stone well before the event. That’s what needs to be studied

        • Berry, one needs to study the ‘event’ before being able to discern the method and agenda behind gun control laws. Once the realization dawns on the investigator as to what our government is truly willing to do to the rest of us just to control us even further, even taking away our inalienable right to use what we choose to use for our own self-defence, then the whole agenda will become obvious.

        • I know lots of people who reckon Bryant was stitched and they’re STILL sitting around in cafes and the like.
          All I can say is, if you really can’t break said habit at least don a bullet-proof helmet & a t-shirt that says “ I’m also wearing body armour”. That’d be a conversation starter, particularly as the latter is also on the prohibited list:
          https://www.australianpolice.com.au/prohibited-weapons/

          • Hey Berry, changing the subject slightly, and you do seen know a bit about policing, do you know if the Melbourne swat squad sit around 24 hours a day dressed ready to respond to an emergency (Jon Feign thinks they do) or were they just doing a ‘Drill’ down at Flagstaff, rehearsing for a possible 3rd. ‘Staged Event’ in town?.

          • I know zilch about the Melbourne Swat Squad so I couldn’t comment per se.

            I’m always skeptical of everything unless:
            a) I’ve witnessed a replica personally
            and/or
            b)It’s supported by overwhelming evidence.

            I 1st got wind of the claim that Port Arthur was a politically actuated set-up around Nov ‘96. I’d never had anything to do with guns but as I’d already witnessed W.A’s State Gov employ the very same techniques re arrogating further control of education it hit a distinct chord . By “the same techniques” I mean convicting innocent folk of crimes they had not committed via the manipulation of common ignorance and emotion.

            Not long afterwards I came across a two-bit character assassination of Bryant that sounded the same alarm.

            I didn’t check out the minutiae until the Po resorted to the same ruse re two of my sons, but by then I was already well and truly convinced.

    • The Rwandan Genocide and the Roman Catholic lnstitution
      (Abstract click on link for full article)
      https://www.biblebasedministries.co.uk/2014/05/29/the-rwandan-genocide-and-the-roman-catholic-institution/4/

      In 1994, the most horrifying massacre of the second half of the twentieth century, the worst genocide since the Jewish [and Serbian] holocausts of World War Two, occurred in the small African state of Rwanda. At least a million people, the vast majority of them ethnic Tutsis, were massacred by ethnic Hutus. Rwanda is predominantly a Roman Catholic country, and it was not long before the evidence started mounting up of the active involvement of priests and nuns in the genocide.

      Last April [2001], two Rwandan nuns, known as “Sisters” Gertrude and Marie Kisito, were found guilty in a Belgian court of participating in the horrific genocide.

      It is amazing how widespread is the belief, in this day and age, that nuns are all gentle, kind, loving people, full of good works and acts of benevolence. In previous, more well-informed ages, Protestants understood only too well that nuns could be as deeply involved in criminal deeds as priests of Rome. History is replete with examples of terrible crimes being committed by the nuns of Rome, both within and outside convent walls.

      Nun Gertrude, a Hutu, was the “mother superior” of the Benedictine convent at Sova, Rwanda. She was accused of turning away thousands of ethnic Tutsis who were fleeing the genocide. Instead of sheltering them, she called in ethnic Hutu soldiers who stoned, hacked, and burned to death over 5000 men, women and children. Nun Marie, also a Hutu, was accused of supplying the Hutu soldiers with the petrol they used to start a fire and burn to death 700 people hiding in a garage on the grounds of the convent.

  7. Thank you Dee for a timely reminder for why we must never forget what has been done to us all in one way or another by our so called ‘governments’.

  8. “Obsessing over who organised a victory ceremony that took place 23 years ago is nothing more than a form of distraction”

    I usually agree with Berry but totally disagree with that statement. Not that I think we need to finally get the baddy’s fingerprints — he/she will turn out to have been ordered by higher ups. But Australians need to get a grip on the PAM.

    If Pauline can be the catalyst for that, wonderful.

    If not, someone else.

    I might mention, Berry, that thousands of rural gun owners objected strenuously to the Bryant myth very early on. I think that in those days One Nation was not quite up and running. In the 1998 election, however, Pauline got a whopping 22% of the Queensland vote.

  9. Sadly most politicians will be too scared and cowardly to question openly Port Arthur, the ridicule and abuse they’d get from the mainstream media would be huge. I hope Pauline gets more courage to look into it. A lot of her support base would be open minded thinking people who would still support her. I just have so much disrespect for our mainstream politicians and their cowardice and dishonesty. Blind Freddy as they say can see Port Arthur was done by professionals. Hopefully the truth will be exposed one day as its starting to be in USA with Russiagate lies. Sadly most of the politicians will make some lame excuse for denying the truth as usual and blame someone else. even a little bit of independent research will show some serious anomalies in these shootings but most too cowardly to do so.

  10. In answer to Berry: If Australians had got off their backsides after it was known that PAM was a government and intelligence organised massacre, the more recent murders in London,
    New York, France, and Christ Church would probably not have happened.

    What is forgotten, is that Ray Groom had been a Federal member who resigned to become involved in Tasmanian politics and took on the position of Premier. Was that long term planning?

    I will now name some of the people and holders of positions that I believe were involved in the organising and cover up of the Port Arthur Massacre: Ray Groom, Federal Ministers at the time, the CEO of ASIO at the time, Commissioner of Police Ian McCreadie, Rowland Browne and of course in charge of the cover up was John Howard and all the MSM CEO’s.

  11. I missed including three others as cover up agents. They were Dr Paul Mullen, John Avery, and Damien Bugg. All knew that Martin was innocent because they all had evidence of his innocence.

  12. I wonder if Dr Paul Mullen has been to New Zealand and especially to Christchurch in recent times or had any consultations with the “Christchurch killer” or killers.

    • Mal, I heard that he was pulled back for an interview on TV, but as far as interviewing Tarrant, I have no idea.

      Mullen did interview Gray after the Aramoana, NZ massacre. In fact, he was ‘coincidentally’ living in Aramoana when it happened. He then moved back to Oz and was a lecturer at Monash University when they had the massacre there.

      Another thing about Aramoana was that ‘Mick’ Dyson was just 5 kilometers away involved in a ‘coincidental’ exercise, so he was available as an SOG expert to help with the siege.

  13. Terry, we live in a world of coincidences, it seems.

    I also missed naming another cover up agent, the late Mike Willesee. After his first Sunday night program covering for John Avery, I wrote first sending an email via Channel 7, but they refused to accept, then I wrote a letter directly to Mike. I then wrote after his second night after I had corrected him on the story, and supplied him with a disk of my information and suggested that he apologise for his misinformation in the MSM. He didn’t reply to any of my communications. Surprise, surprise!

    • Mal, The 60 Minutes crew seem just a part of the Cabal Media operations. However, every now and then, they surprise me, like when they did the expose of child trafficking in London entitled “Spies, Lords and Predators”

      Good guys and bad guys??

  14. Of course this is to take our guns away. We know this is just one avenue of attack by the enemies freedom and liberty.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rTChFWQ6Ohk (1hr8min)
    is a video called “How to argue gun control”. It is by a solo ‘news agregator’ who (sadly) is no longer in production. A channel of excellent content.

    What he says is that it all boils down to this:

    Do you want gun control? Then you will have a high murder rate.

    Do you want no gun control? Then you will have a high suicide rate.

  15. I wonder if people in the know about these so called massacres have been silenced with threats if they come forward? They’d have to be some threats hanging over many as not all could be brain washed into believing it’s all for a good cause and the deaths are just collateral damage like the over million dead since USA invade Iraq ?

  16. I wonder if all those in the know about the real details of port Arthur etc have been silenced by threats ? They can’t all have been brainwashed into believing it was for a good cause and the deaths were just collateral damage ?

  17. Ok over half an hour and my comment disapeared….. could not find server!!
    So to repeat… sort of.
    Who are the idiot politicians and msm types who have no questions concerning the PA murders and the lack of transpareny and competency of any alleged investigation of the murders?
    Oh, they are also the official government 911 conspiracy tin foil hat unscientific gullible conspiracy theorists.
    Well, they have form and consistent.

  18. What’s tragic is even the fairly discerning, conservative media poo poo the pa conspiracy just as much as the left. I wish they’d have the guts to have a mature debate on it and not just pathetically parrot the official line.

    • Ken, do yourself a favor and look up Operation Mockingbird – a CIA agenda to gain total control over all the world’s media. The media today is controlled by six corporations who all work to the same One World Goal, but use many different facades to achieve it.

      The only reliable media today is what you can find on the internet – the alternative media. Vet your sources accordingly.

  19. Paging Diane DeVere.
    What about Mike Willessee? I had not realized he died 4 weeks ago. Poor thing. He never stood a chance. His dad sent him to an abusive Boy’s Home, albeit only for a short time, “to strengthen him.” yeah, right.

    I wonder if there is a chance he tried to tell the truth, especially as his death was by “throat” cancer. None of the biggies has to die of cancer. Oh they are so cruel. If only people could face up to what is going on they would never put up with the cruelties.

    As for tick bites, I hope “they” do not have a method to deliver them other than by Tick Express.

    But you never know. Oh they are so cruel. I hope Pauline knows that treatment for a tick bite is effective if started quicksmart after the bite.

    Willessee obituary:

    https://www.nowtolove.com.au/news/local-news/mike-willesee-dies-54422

  20. Pauline Hanson, please keep the pressure on the subject of the Port Arthur Massacre. Heads need to roll to free the law abiding peoples of the World. Hopefully Donald Trump’s team will shortly have heads rolling in the US and further afield.

    Australia had the largest modern day massacre and looks like Australia could be the nation that brings the World economy down with the housing bubble caused by our criminal banksters, so why not be the first to bring down the globalists that created the recent terrorist attacks, from 1996 onwards.

      • Pauline Hanson came from the Liberals, and One Nation only exists because it makes the Liberals appear to be less right wing. My theory is that they could always have been part of the act.

          • I don’t know what One Nation is about nowadays. However, back in ’96 it was apparent that it was a counter intelligence operation – a ‘controlled opposition’ (put in place to suck up the discontent after Port Arthur).

            I had more than a few dealings with the ‘two Davids’, Pauline and the staff at Manly. I’ve got heaps of stories….

            I tried to warn Pauline what was going on, but she wasn’t capable of grasping what I was telling her. I suppose when she was convicted, taken into custody and they were doing the ‘cavity searches’, she just may have figured out she had been had.

            I have no idea who may be close to her now and whether the spooks are still using her. She is an honest person and has good intentions, however she has a number of faults that make her vulnerable.

          • Terry, I cannot fault your reasoning. 23 years ago I too was as clueless as Pauline Hanson. In fact, I am still learning! IMHO, we all have so much to learn about how this world truly operates.

            I believe we don’t live long enough to learn everything there is to learn – those of us who can keep an open mind of course.

          • Nemesis, what evidence can you provide that Hanson or Latham have ever explained the “money creation trick”, “the Zionist factor”, the fraudulent “war on terror”, the “Holocaust” frauds, “false flag terrorism strategies”, or the “peak oil” and “climate change” crisis hoaxes, which are just some of the fundamental critical deceptions that the monopoly cabals have manufactured to control mankind?
            I have never read or heard of any One Nation publication or broadcast that was intellectual and referenced in format and standard that would qualify as genuine substantial adult political argument?
            How could you conclude these people are truth based in their thinking and action?
            I am assuming if you are reading here you are well read on all these topics.

          • Christopher, what political party has ever ventured past their political goals in the arena of public opinion?

            How this world is controlled requires an education, and an education can only come about for those willing to learn, and I may add, prepared to swallow some very bitter pills of Truth on their journey.

            Have you ever attempted to impart onto others your accumulated knowledge? If so, how did they react?

            How long would One Nation last as a political party if Pauline began spouting what everyone on this planet should know, but not everyone is aware of?

            Cue: Twilight Zone music playing in the background.

            And the above could equally apply to any political party that dared to breech the forbidden knowledge denied to us all, so why do you only target One Nation?.

          • Nemesis, your “targeted” comment is distracting invention.
            I apply the same lens to all issues and political candidates or parties.
            How will you get honest politics if you vote for dishonest political representation?
            I guess you have a different view but mine is quite simple, only support the genuinely truthful account of things and never vote for any candidate that is not of similar accountable and honest mind.
            Your reasoning is faulty and millions of Australians like yourself “resonate” with candidates and happily vote for them even though they admit, like yourself, that the whole truth is not on offer, only as much truth as our rulers will allow.
            Hence we never get the full freedom, full prosperity, and full security that we know is possible, because you are hoodwinked in to voting for less.
            You can hardly complain or be surprised when you get what you voted for.
            Myself, I am annoyed that my fellows do not have higher and more disciplined political habits, as I do not vote for incompetent liars and their compromising self serving flawed policies.
            I do take very reasonable steps to inform all these people of the information and reasoning that is based on proper research and correct principles.
            I agree we cannot expect perfection or genius but I do expect consistent rational integrity and aspirants of the full truth of things.

          • Christopher, you have missed entirely the meaning in my last response to you – and that is – you will never get honesty from any politician so long as the electorate remains ignorant as to their actions.

            And many Aussies simply find voting a nuisance – so how does one change that mindset. My answer would be – only through education.

            Over the past two decades only one politician has been steadfast on her message for this country – again you miss what Hanson has been saying and warning us all about – name just one other politician who has been on message for two decades about their concerns for this country?

            You and I can see the problem, but many others cannot, or wish not to see the many problems that our current system has become – a corrupted and criminal enterprise.

            Maybe Trump has the answer?

          • Nemesis, education is the first step and One Nation fail to educate and train their members which is my point that they are a recipe for going no where and but burning up energy that could be very effective if it was fully and honestly informed.
            Where is the truth about Port Arthur left following Pauline’s back flip last week.
            As for Trump, competent researchers have done great work in exposing he is totally owned and controlled by the Zionist gang as was his father.

          • Again, you single out One Nation as if One Nation is the key to all the ills of a corrupt system. Politicians are supposed to act on the people’s behalf – not instruct them on what to believe. And, If you honestly believe that Trump is a puppet to anyone other than God – then you are missing the BIG picture of how this world has been controlled since very ancient times, and the battle for this world that Trump has taken on.

          • The reason One Nation is the focus in these comments is because Pauline is the topic of this article, nothing unreasonable I suggest.

            Did you view the “Know More News” episode I linked and do you believe Trump’s deep and long held association with all the Zionist agencies and identities referenced in the report is of no concern?
            Are you a believer in the type of ideals and philosophies of “Zionism” and “Fundamentalist Christian” dogma which are very similar in many respects because they have the same New World Order monopoly pedigree.
            I invite you to table an authoritative reference on..
            The Money Question
            The Holocaust Controversy
            Zionism
            The War On Terror
            This will clarify your views for me to understand your position.

          • Christopher – Zionism is an invention, a construct to deflect the actions of those who currently control this world and that Trump is combatting. Those who hide behind Zionism – Rothschild, Rockefeller, et al, are no more Jewish or beholden to Jewish values than Satan himself is.

            I would suggest that your own biases are blinding you to the reality of how this world works and has worked for a very long time.

            I did not view your link – thank you anyway. Your question regarding Trump’s association with some very dark people deserves a response though.

            When one aims to take on those who control this world what better way of learning how they operate, so as to be better armed against them, than by befriending the very worst of them?

            As Sun Tzu has told us – in order to defeat your enemy you must first get to know him.

            Trump’s actions to date give no validity to what you are suggesting about him.

          • Nemesis,
            Well I guess I can now understand why you argue that One Nation is credible when you also argue you are happy with Trumps Zionist associations and financial sponsors.
            I note you chose not to evidence your understanding on the topics I nominated.
            All associations are invented by man, hardly a revelation!
            I must assume you are just an anonymous time waster with no thought or evidence substance.
            If you close your eyes to the credible evidence supporting my statement regarding Trumps Zionist associations and financial sponsorship, then you can keep believing any version of reality you choose as your faith.
            On the other hand, if you actually had serious substance you would answer the questions and reference I tabled as informing my argument.
            If you wish to be taken seriously the first thing you need to do is not be anonymous but perhaps you have different aims with your anonymous commentary.
            Do One Nation supporters get trained to understand all the tricky factors at play in our information reality?
            The recent interesting exposure on the Israeli Lobby is an item of information that should be included in calculating all political matters and is of course relevant to the Trump allegiance with Zionism/Israel.

          • Christopher – is that your real name?

            I sometimes use Nemesis on websites because I have nine articles within the islammonitor.org site that is stored at the Australian National Library – my choice of non de plume of Nemesis, was in response to the original site owners not wishing to publish contributors real names.

            And I have used that title since 2008. You may also check out my comments at gatesofvienna.org

            But on other websites I use my real name which is Terrence Odgers – and this site’s managers may verify that. If you choose to do so.

            And I live in New South Wales – so how about yourself?

            I see by your ‘personal assessment’ of me, that you are still attempting to pigeon hole me – and I do note that is one of the rules from the book, Rules for Radicals, written by Saul Alinsky, who by the way, and in case you missed, devoted that book to Satan.

            Are you not familiar with that book?

            You have avoided implicating other political parties, even though, what One Nation is being accused of, is openly practised by all the major parties- so it is obvious to me that One Nation is your intended target!

            Perhaps One Nation concerns you more then you are letting on?

            And your ‘nominated topics, for me to consider, reflect more on your own bias than I would ever presume to influence those who do not share my own conclusions with because the TRUTH is a journey that all individuals must take of their own volition – of course there should be guides along the way for everyone’s path in life – but those guides should never be used to indoctrinate, as you appear to be indoctrinated.

            ‘I must assume that you are an anonymous time waster……’

            If I were an ‘anonymous time waster’ then I would not be using my title which can be verified against my email account.

            ‘On the other hand, if you had serious substance…..’ So you have been responding to an anonymous time waster who has no serous substance……poor fool you if that is what you truly believe!

            IMO. your stance on so called ‘Zionism’ gives your whole game away which is – that you appear to be a willing dupe to the One World Globalists.

            You should correct me, If I am wrong.

          • Judaism
            Christianity
            Greek Orthodoxy
            Islamism
            Protestantism
            Jesuits
            Communism
            etc.
            Same ancestor: Biblical Abraham.

            This war is the theological state v the secular state.
            This is why freedom of speech is important, because you don’t have that in a theocratic state.
            To any government or theocratic body, anything could be construed as Hate Speech. And where will your recourse be?

            As a white male, I have seen the constant attacks on our kind for decades. It does not matter that I have not been racist, it does not matter that I have not been sexist, it does not matter I have not been homophobic.
            I am continually attacked for this due to circumstances due solely to how I was born. And I am just told to “be better” or “do more”. It does not matter if I do these things, because all it does is make them say “you now must jump higher”
            Left or right, there are good people in both, but just like people on the right will label everyone else as “part of the left” and those on the left will label everyone else as “part of the right”, it will not matter if “The Rothschilds” are fake jews or not.

            And that is the trap.

            Racism is not the problem supremacism is.
            And supremacism is not solely the province of white people.

          • Terrence Odgers, it has been an interesting discovery process.
            You make a great many wordy sweeping claims for someone who provides no reference or evidence.
            My identity is always open and public and very easily researched.
            You have yet to make any clear referenced statement on any matter and seem to believe your own opinion is sufficient to convince yourself of your own opinion.
            I insist on evidenced argument or declare a fraud.
            I will not pretend I can make any sense of anything you have written because you contradict yourself and muddle your language, all the while you just cannot seem to bring yourself the courage of your convictions to come out in the open and table something that actually says something about anything.
            It would be a waste of my time beyond the amusement.
            Maybe I am wrong and you will bring yourself to the table and engage my reference and questions, and evidence your argument so we can see if there is one and what facts stand up.
            You do appear to concede One Nation is like all the other political parties, and Zionism involves bad people, but then you advocate they are the path to follow for you and Trump.
            I am opposed to all monopoly ideas and policies, which of course include Zionism and it’s New World Order program.
            I sense you have some obscure theory about the world but you have yet to summon the courage to plainly reveal these thoughts, and the fact you are obviously reluctant to put down any information, and just invent and make accusations towards me personally, ignoring my information, leaves me concluding you are not so confident that your version of reality will stand up to critical scrutiny.
            I am still pondering what world philosophical view combines Zionism, Trump, One Nation compromising principles, and was that working with the devil to get to know him better.
            I look forward to my illumination of all this confusion.

          • Christopher, obviously your view of this world and my view of this world differ in many ways.

            Just because you choose to put up video links as reinforcing your own views that you may consider to be worthy of note, does not mean that it is exactly how anyone other than yourself, may perceive it.

            I offer no links or reference sources to you as you seem to be pretty well on the way to having made up your own mind as to what you wish to believe – but is it the TRUTH?

            I still tend to keep an open mind on everything I read, watch or listen to, unless those little nuggets of Truth become too compelling to ignore, to which I then add them to my memory.

            Seeking Truth can be a lonely journey on a path that is compromized by so many distractions. Mark Twain (Samuel Clemens just to placate your sense of propriety) once quipped that there are two great events in everyone’s life, the first is to be born into this world, and the second, is to find out why we were born.

            Many today choose to ignore both lessons that Twain meant to highlight and that their controlled world that is kept in a box restricts them from learning about.

            Eustace Mullins has much to add to that kind of thinking – if you are interested.

            My thinking and opinions, come from what I have already learned and accepted as being of value to aid me on the rest of my journey through life as an individual human being in a world of confusion and control.

            You taunt me with accusations, yet you seem to ignore that the TRUTH of anything is really in the eye of the beholder of those who are prepared to accept what their eyes and ears will tell them – not what they wish to believe.

            You put up an original comment on this thread concerning someone who speaks TRUTH to which I now realize was just some bait on which to hang someone. You test me with the false accusation that you have trouble comprehending my responses to you, yet your own responses to me hint at your complete understanding of where I am coming from.

            If you are confused as you state you are, then let me suggest to you, that it is from nothing that I have written.

          • Nemesis, you are correct I do not agree with your principles, morals, or world view.
            You have been shy in stating your political stance so I thought I best table your view myself.

            “Therefore it is important for all freedom loving peoples to get behind Israel which is on the front line in the war on terror”
            The Plight of Tiny Israel
            Monday, 05 January 2009

            Nemesis you even wrote you were “excited” at the heavy bombing of Gaza.

            I have a great deal of authoritative evidence that Israel is a terror apartheid state and the Zionist US Empire that established the Israel project is a very significant source of on going terror about the world, some of it dressed up and branded as “Islamism”, Neo-Nazi” and White Supremacist”, which all play respective roles in ushering in the monopoly New World Order plan.

            Where does this Zionist support of all the “Alt right” and “conservative” political agencies leave us when many of the political followers of Trump, and Hanson believe they are voting against the establishment.

            The “by way of deception” holds true.

            More info and explanation on the present intense political condition and direction.

          • Christopher – why is it important to you that I state my political stance? Shouldn’t life be more in tuned with getting on with everyone else than knowing one’s political stance before deciding to get along?

            And what has the survival of eight million Jews and Muslim Arabs who also live in Israel, as Israelis, and have been fighting for their existence since the state of Israel was declared amongst the surrounding Arab Muslim states, got to do with ‘political stances’?

            Please elaborate.

            So you took the time to read one of my posts – and I note – that you latched onto the first, what you believed to be a, ‘gotcha moment’ in the second paragraph about ‘my excitement’.

            You are so typical of what the fake media present. Maybe if you bothered to read the entire article you would have become more informed as to my ‘excitement’, but I doubt that you even bothered to read past that ‘gotcha moment’, so as to put that exclamation into the more broader context that it was meant to mean.

            Your ‘evidence’ as being authority based against the state of Israel means diddly squat to me. If you could even shift yourself to explore the foundation of Israel under United Nations declaration in 1947 that has now turned into a orchestrated demonization of Israel by the same organization just 70 years later – again – a tiny population of Jews and Arabs against the whole world, LOL! Then any thoughtful person must ask themselves – how come a tiny state of eight million people have upset the might United Nations and most of the rest of the world?

            How do you feel about Trump’s American Embassy move to Jerusalem?

            Have you ever read the works of Josephus, the Roman General Titus’s scribe?

            Do you believe all that history is just a story?

            Are you that enthralled to such an organization as the Untied Nations, or so biased against the state of Israel, that you would believe their lies?

            As to your last paragraph: what is the alt-right? Could you provide an example of what you mean? As for conservatives being on board with the state of Israel I would beg to differ, as many conservatives that I know share your own views. History is the great solver for those events that have become ‘politicized’ especially for Israel as archeological and biblical records demonstrate.

            Politics has a nasty habit of abandoning both to suit a political goal – as history tends to demonstrate , especi.

  21. A very interesting online chat ive just listened to on the Christchurch Psyop is by Ole Dammagard and Alfred Lambremont.

    His research has shown that all these mass shootings are carried out by the same people.

  22. I do not agree with all the ideas Pauline Hanson has expressed over the years, but I respect her as a person.
    She has shown more courage than most of us.
    If we do not know how she is “managed”, lets reserve judgement on her.
    I would like to think there are many asking the same questions who would have supported her, but then again that would only matter if we lived in a democracy.

  23. Pauline Hanson is the only politician to question the Port Arthur Massacre and see what the corporate-government propaganda Mockingbird media and press do to her and any others who dare to question the unbelievable story of the Port Arthur Massacre. We must feed her with material as she can pass on to others in her political party.

    Mary and Dee have been around the ropes for awhile and so have I. This is the only Australian outlet to discuss and reveal what is happening compared to the false narratives we hear and read daily.

    Beware: We must be wary and suspicious of any compulsive lying politician and the Propagandists who work in the media and press who are unwilling to provide the truth for any matter.

    Their tactics or Standard Operating Procedure or aka are to lie and deny and to have a media and press ‘Blackout’ of the subject. They character assassinate the person trying to provide truth of the matter dissenting against constant and perpetual false narratives.

    These people are adhering to an evil false political-spiritual ideology that is in the process of creating havoc, destruction and death with their globalists (Communist-Fascist) One World Order.

    If we look at the history of evidence and facts of the 9/11 false flag perpetual wars that are ever increasing this is their NWO of chaos, destruction, mass immigration, mass dislocation of peoples, millions wounded and millions murdered with no end in sight….

    Their false promise of an “ordered” NWO is nothing more than a lie as nations are being infiltrated and taken over under the guise of a false narrative by the Mockingbird prostitute media and press, by the evil Israeli Zionist regime/lobby worldwide, by the Communist UN which is anything but “united”.. and lastly the Latin Roman Catholic Church-State. All of these entities want guns banned from national sovereign nations.

    Once the guns are seized and confiscated we will see massive deaths and the tyrannical force of these evil globalists will be revealed to all as the democratic process of what is just a skeleton of what it should be is finally destroyed. Property will be seized and confiscated as well as the world is in debt created by these insane megalomaniacs and we the “Human Resources” and the countries are the collateral. Corporatism has been running the governments for some time now.

    We are already and have been for some time in the process of “REDISTRIBUTION’ and this weakens the sovereignty of nations ion the process. It is a premeditated tactic of Communism with the constant ‘incremental’ increases of water, electricity, gas and a number of taxes.

  24. “The comments provoked fury from Labor and the Greens, who renewed calls for the Coalition to repudiate One Nation by preferencing the far-right party last…

    Labor and the Greens are nothing more than Socialist-Communists and their false political ideology to have guns banned is part of the evil agenda to take over the national sovereignty of countries. They cannot be honest enough as politicians are conniving creatures that are constant compulsive liars. They are not “Honourable” as their title suggests.

  25. I am re-posting an article (28 April 2018) by Malcolm R Hughes. He is a regular contributor to Gumshoe and has done his citizen’s duty for many years in trying to inform government officials about the truth of the port Arthur massacre.

    Members of political parties have to toe the line or else! They have to support the political ideology of that party or go independent. I have dealt with politicians over the past 4 decades and it is a complete waste of time. They do not act honourable or with integrity as the Westminster system is not democratic at all. Add the adversarial combatancy in Parliament and you have a bunch of theatre actors and not much gets done.

    There was a book called “The Stench of Parliament” by a genuine Australian who cared about Australia not these counterfeits that call themselves Australians. It was state not federal but he wanted to run for a Senator at the age of 80.
    The Stench in this Parliament : The Authorised Biography of John Hatton AO
    http://stenchinthisparliament.blogspot.com/2009/10/to-buy-book.html

    The political parties have been ‘Centralising’ government for decades in Canberra. I was educated in the US and we were taught that Centralisation is Communism. It takes unwarranted power from the states. The state politicians have been weak and do not defend the statehood of states.

    The Stench of Totalitarianism is fast approaching! It is called “Full Spectrum Dominance”
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Full-spectrum_dominance
    http://archive.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=45289
    https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-03-20/countdown-americas-full-spectrum-dominance
    https://www.amazon.com/Full-Spectrum-Dominance-Totalitarian-Democracy/dp/398132630Xhttps://www.globalresearch.ca/full-spectrum-dominance-totalitarian-democracy-in-the-new-world-order/14046

  26. We know “Beyond Reasonable Doubt” that the Port Arthur Massacre was state-sponsored terrorism and not the mimicked ‘lone nut’ that the Fascist US often uses for their assassinations of people in High Office.

    The Federal Government was involved with their secret SAC- PAV inner circle

    http://www.hiddenmysteries.org/conspiracy/conspiracy/parthur6.html The subversion of the so-called ‘Freedom of the press’ in Tasmania in relation to the Port Arthur Massacre, the denial of any form of trial for the accused, Martin Bryant, and the deliberate actions to refuse any form of Coronial Inquiry or inquest into the deaths, feature strongly in both the Tasmanian Government (Liberal) and the Federal Government, which was also Liberal. What this demonstrates is that both the major political parties were involved, and each must be apportioned with some of the responsibility of the Massacre.

    But it is always that first question of, “Who did it?” that demands an answer. There is insufficient proof at this moment to point the finger of guilt, but there is enough evidence to suggest who is responsible and why. The motives are there, and so is the ability.

    One clue is given by the Tasmanian Government’s SAC-PAV representative, Mr Bob Grierson, who has stated, “SAC-PAV proved its worth at Port Arthur. If there were any doubts before about the value of the organization to the national security of Australia, then that doubt should disappear now.”

    And in fact, SAC-PAV did prove its worth at Port Arthur. It is one thing to have countless exercises, but the proof is only evident in the real thing, and Port Arthur was as close as it could come, except for all the other preparations, which have been noted. SAC-PAV have now gained the right to be in full control of the security of this country and that is essential considering the 2000 Olympic Games at Sydney.

    SAC-PAV has demonstrated that they can control the media. They have access to manipulating the health system, and they can do similar things to the transport industry (aeroplanes, trains, buses, etc) and many other facets required to combat a terrorist threat. They have trained the constabulary, and have control over certain aspects of our law enforcement bodies, and although these are State bodies, protected by State constitutions, the influence now emanates from a Federal bureaucracy, which is not constitutional.

    If there was any other bureaucracy in the running to compete with SAC-PAV for operating the required security of Australia, or if there had been doubts about the efficiency of the services under SAC-PAV to combine and present a united front in the fight against terrorism, then all that has been removed by the events at Port Arthur. In this way the Federal Attorney General’s Department tightened its grip on all its various State and Federal components, and strengthened its own position in the bureaucratic jungle of Canberra.

    SAC-PAV though is a committee, with representatives from both the States, in a minority, and the Commonwealth. However it is the Protective Security Co-ordination Centre, that controls SAC-PAV, and this body is purely Federal, being a department with the Federal Attorney General’s Department. PSCC provides the Executive and secretariat support, manages the equipment, training, exercise programs and maintains the National Anti-Terrorist Plan for SAC-PAV. What is also noticeable was that the National Anti-Terrorist Plan was endorsed in November 1995, and first utilised during the Port Arthur Massacre in April 1996, five months later. http://www.hiddenmysteries.org/…/conspiracy/parthur6.html
    They are evil treacherous seditious traitors to Australia. They are Globalists which are Communists. The constant illegal over-taking of states rights and those Premiers who have succeeded those state rights to to Canberra for Centralising power is Communism. Again I say Australia was set up as a FEDERATION not CENTRALISATION
    Manage

    The Federal Government was involved
    The Tasmanian SOG were involved
    The corrupt BAR judiciary were involved
    The media and press were involved
    The hospital and surgeons were involved in some way or some how
    The helicopter personnel
    the buying of the Cafe by the Tasmania government
    The purchase of a portable mortuary truck prior to the massacre. Why was the Senator never questioned by the AFP? He and many others need to be placed under a lie detector test.
    No coronial enquiry which was stifled by ex-PM Howard over-riding state rights and a criminal offence when internationals are murdered.
    No trial for the accused Martin Bryant

    The SAS were on sight days before travelled all the way from the vast state of Western Australia to do “exercises” that have never been explained under the extreme circumstance of the massacre of innocent Australian civilians and internationals.

    There are hundreds of unanswered questions, destruction of evidence, obfuscation by all of the above added to the charges of premeditated murder and conspiracy. Australia in not a lucky country.

    • I debate that SAC-PAV proved its value at Port Arthur. They did not get involved in any realistic action at Port Arthur. They were not even present at any time at P.A.H.S. While at Seascape they were not in any danger of being attacked, as they had at least two insiders in the building. They also had radio contact with one of those insiders. Yet they allowed the building to be set alight, knowing there were people and bodies inside that building. They also prevented a police sniper from doing his duty of killing a person firing live rounds at , helicopters, by communicating to him after his request “to fire”. Answer “Negative, negative, this has to happen.”

      So how did SAC-PAV prove its worth, when anything at Seascape was so surreal, nothing like a real siege situation. Yet these heroes(?), now have control of all situations where the lives of the public could be in danger, caused by the heads of the very same group that employ the SAC-PAV.

      • Aussiemal
        Yes the SAC-Pav should be discussed most definitely! That is why I bring the subject and this group into the spotlight.

        I am ex-US military and those that do the planning and co-ordinating are not necessarily in the attack. It is my understanding that it was a secret or sensitive committee but we don’t don’t much about them or it.

        Was it with mercenaries in which they like to use the Politically Correct word of “Contractors?

        I came across this the other day and I think you will find it most interesting….

        Chrissy Chat – Lets Muckety Around Serco

        This is one of the most controversial organisations today for a number of reasons. This would help to open up a whole new parameter of insight and connections most valuable to researchers of truth

        Mobile Playback Version

        Abel Danger Serco articles
        https://duckduckgo.com/?q=abel+danger+and+serco&t=opera&ia=videos
        SERCO Owns the World, | Big Brother Watch

  27. What people need to realise is that even if all of western civilization weren’t racists, 9/10ths of the world would still be racist.

    Time to look at how our enemies think instead of projecting our values onto other races.

  28. Has anyone heard of the Balfour Declaration?

    I quote:

    Foreign Office

    November 2nd, 1917

    Dear Lord Rothschild,

    I have much pleasure in conveying to you, on behalf of this Majesty’s Government, the following declaration of sympathy with Jewish Zionist aspirations which has been submitted to, and approved by, the Cabinet.

    “His Majesty’s Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavors to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.”

    I should be grateful if you would bring this declaration to the knowledge of the Zionist Federation.

    Yours sincerely,

    Arthur James Balfour

    Were the british peoples enslaved by this?
    This agreement brought the USA into World War I. Just think: the Zionists brought the USA into the war against Germany.

  29. Hello is anyone out there in the World who can read or honour promises?

    “it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, ”

    Right slap bang in the middle of the Balfour Declaration. Are not the majority of Palestinians non-Jewish. Where have their rights been since the Zionist take-over of Palestine. I mean the robbery that took place after World War II, thanks to the UK. How is it that the UK thought that it had the right to “give” another country to a group of outsiders?

    Does the US, today, have a right to pass on to any other country the land mass of Australia? This is the same scenario.

    • Aussiemal, are you able to provide just one example for your assertion that the so called ‘Palestinian’ has been robbed of their land?

          • Reciting facts is not a demonstration of a bias, other than toward historic truths that you have not responded to.

        • Ned. You know as well as I, that I could just as easily provide links to many other ‘docos’ that would discount your ‘facts’.

          Real history is in archeology and the Bible. Youtube docos are unreliable unless they provide verifiable sources for their information.

          And I’m still waiting on Aussiemal.

          • Indeed, there are many propaganda documentaries that are suspect in regard to some historic details.
            As for the link above;
            http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/mapstellstory.html
            Is there anything in that documentary that suggests that Palestine did not exist?
            For example: the Palestinian coins depicted; Do you suppose that they were minted by Israel?
            And our soldiers sacrificed in Palestine fighting the Ottomans for the Empire, do you suggest that they were sacrificed for Israel?l

          • Ned, good questions you put to me. Give me a day, as I am chasing up Christopher Brooks latest accusation against me for which I have no clue.

            I will get back to you – that’s a promise!

          • Ned. That video is not two thousand years old otherwise it would show the lands demonstrated as being Samaria and Judea – Hebrew and Cananite lands.

            Coins, generally of gold. silver and copper, were minted by many peoples for thousands of years. The only truly datable coins from those times are from the Roman occupation of Samaria and Judea because one side has the Roman Emporer’s head as a reference source – most other coins generally have no reference time period for their minting and are open to interpretation.

            There was no land termed as Palestine in those times. The word ‘Palestine’ is a corrupted version of the Roman word ‘philisitia’ which is a derogatory term that was used by the Romans to describe land that was no longer fit or suitable for Roman occupation after the Jewish revolt of 70AD – please look up the term Philisita, there are even references to the meaning on youtube – but don’t forget to check out the sources they use so as to verify.

            It was the British who brought back the term ‘Palestine’ to describe what was generally up until 1900, titled, The Holy Land. You can search all you like in the great libraries but you will not find any reference to ‘Palestine’ until the 1880s, when the Rothschild’s put their plan forward. Do you believe the British hierarchy were not familiar with the old Roman term Philistia and its meaning and intention of use as to why they used Palestine to describe the Holy Land?

            Tel Aviv and Hebron were the only modern cities in the Holy Land during the time of the ANZAC Light Horse. You may read many letters of appreciation from the members of the Light Horse who were billeted in those cities during their stay. All Jewish towns. And you can also read many letters from the members of the Light Horse that are not very complimentary toward the Arab residents of the Holy Land.

            You may wish to read of the reprisal by the ANZAC forces against the Arab village of Surafend in December, 1918 such was the disregard that the ANZAC forces held against the Arab.

            Paul Daley’s book, Beersheba, is a good starting point to explore what the Aussies and Kiwi’s experienced in the Holy Land.

            If you think I spend all this effort in making up what I write, then let me know.

            I’m sure we have gone over this ground before.

            Cheers!

  30. Terrence, I do not pretend I can have a rational discussion with any person who believes the Old Testament is literal history.
    Fancy being shocked you would be expected to answer to your own written views!
    I suggest readers should take a look and learn about our tricky political condition and an example of a One Nation “supporters” mind set.
    https://islammonitor.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1489:nemesis&catid=246:nemesis-&Itemid=6

    • LOL Christopher! I have put that website up a few times myself for others to read – if they are adventurous enough in seeking out the TRUTH.

      And you know what they say about making assumptions.

      I guess that’s it is it? You’ve made your mind up so please don’t bother you with the FACTs!

  31. This a interview with Cynthia McKinney, (long) ex US a senator that Pauline should listen to.
    Waste of time for the other political spivs and msm liars who have been protecting the 911 mass murderers and supporting the mas murder of millions in the Middle East.
    So much common sense expressed by Cynthia……….learnt from the Nuns!!!

    I was so impressed with Cynthia back in those days I even rang her office from Australia to congratulate and encourage her.
    So would someone please send this to Pauline as an example of being true to one’s conscience and integrity.

    • Another reminder for the lying warmongering politicians and MSM running dogs …………… you lot have helped kill millions and serialise misery.
      Feel good?

  32. Ned
    They are satanic and they want to control the world with their “Full Spectrum Dominance” geo-political-religious ideology. It is a battle of the minds and control of everything from over the top surveillance to controlling and militarising space. It is also a spiritual war as well to control the masses as well.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Full-spectrum_dominance
    http://archive.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=45289
    https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-03-20/countdown-americas-full-spectrum-dominance
    https://www.amazon.com/Full-Spectrum-Dominance-Totalitarian-Democracy/dp/398132630X
    https://www.globalresearch.ca/full-spectrum-dominance-totalitarian-democracy-in-the-new-world-order/14046

    Yes Cynthia has been working with the ex CIA Robert Steele and they are good friends. she has spoken out on many issues that others have not.

  33. Thank you very much for this thought-provoking post. I wrote an article regarding the recent events which have had a significant impact on the credibility of the One Nation party and Pauline Hanson. It would be great if you could read the article on my blog and let me know what you think 🙂

C'mon Leave a Reply, Debate and Add to the Discussion

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.