Home Earth/ Climate Rolling Out 5G: Devastating Impacts on Humanity and the Environment

Rolling Out 5G: Devastating Impacts on Humanity and the Environment

53
Imagine trying to sleep in the bedroom a few metres away from this 5G transmitter

by Dee McLachlan

Get ready for the roll out. Excitement For Australians — Really?

Australia’s Science Channel writes:  “Much to the excitement of Australians, solid plans to roll out fast 5G mobile communication technology were announced in 2018.”

I have not yet met any Australian who is pleased about this new threatened development. Rather this is a bad move and everyone knows it. Perhaps we should take as a measure of malfeasance any enthusiastic statement about 5G.

For example, here is a statement from Professor Andrew Wood at Swinburne University. He says:

“We believe the main biological effect of the electromagnetic radiation from mobile phones is a rise in temperature… There are also concerns that there could be more subtle effects, such as links between long-term exposure and certain types of cancer, but while there is some evidence from epidemiological and animal studies, these remain controversial.”

Professor Andrew Wood in Swinburne’s anechoic chamber

Has Wood got tenure? If so, too bad. How could he possibly endorse the un-endorsable? Further, he goes to reassure us, in mainstream-media fashion:

 “As the frequency goes up, the depth of penetration into biological tissues goes down, so the skin and eyes, rather than the brain, become the main organs of health concern.”

Wood’s team, which is part of the multi-institutional Australian Centre for Electromagnetic Bioeffects Research (ACEBR), is a key contributor to the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) review, which is expected to be released in 2019.

We don’t have time for this. Indeed we don’t have time. This whole thing is an emergency and should be treated as such. As far back as 2016, the American Academy of Pediatrics wrote a Guide for handling the old G4 cell phones. They said:

“Use text messaging when possible, and use cell phones in speaker mode or with the use of hands-free kits. When talking on the cell phone, try holding it an inch or more away from your head.

“Avoid carrying your phone against the body like in a pocket, sock, or bra. Cell phone manufacturers can’t guarantee that the amount of radiation you’re absorbing will be at a safe level.

“Keep an eye on your signal strength (i.e. how many bars you have). The weaker your cell signal, the harder your phone has to work and the more radiation it gives off. It’s better to wait until you have a stronger signal before using your device.

“Avoid making calls in cars, elevators, trains, and buses. The cell phone works harder to get a signal through metal, so the power level increases.

“Remember that cell phones are not toys or teething items.”

Not teething items. Right.

Dr. Martin L. Pall, Professor Emeritus of Biochemistry and Basic Medical Sciences at Washington State University, says 5G poses a massive health risk. “Putting in tens of millions of 5G antennae without a single biological test of safety has got to be about the stupidest idea anyone has had in the history of the world.”

Now you’re talking.

Please take note of the Millennium Report. It says:

“5G ROLL-OUT: An Ongoing National Emergency that Requires an Immediate Shutdown by the American People.” I have extracted the following from that article:

“4G was first deployed in Scandinavia in December of 2009.  From its first entry into cellular communication markets across the USA, there has been much written about the serious medical ailments and adverse health impacts directly associated with exposure to 4G. Certain brands of cell phone technology were proven to raise the rate of brain cancer quite substantially among other severe health effects.

“What we do know a little about is the meteoric 5G roll-out that’s occurring throughout the USA today.  For example, we know that 5G Is The Most Dangerous Technological Development of the Millennium.”

Yes, there is undoubtedly a very dark side to this conspicuously untested and premature roll-out of 5G.

The Millennium article questions whether Democrats making a fuss over the building of Trump’s wall might be an engineered distraction from the swiftly occurring 5G roll-out. It suggests that the roll out constitutes a “calamity of epic proportions for those who live there and are already suffering from EMF sensitivity.”

One has to wonder how many hidden agendas there are behind 5G.

Scientists Speak Out

Arthur Firstenberg has posted an open letter to the UN, WHO, EU, Council of Europe and governments of all nations. The rest of my article is taken from his letter:

We the undersigned scientists, doctors, environmental organizations and citizens … urgently call for a halt to the deployment of the 5G (fifth generation) wireless network, including 5G from space satellites. 5G will massively increase exposure to radio frequency (RF) radiation on top of the 2G, 3G and 4G networks for telecommunications already in place. RF radiation has been proven harmful for humans and the environment. The deployment of 5G constitutes an experiment on humanity and the environment that is defined as a crime under international law.

Telecommunications companies worldwide, with the support of governments, are poised within the next two years to roll out the fifth-generation wireless network (5G).   This is set to deliver what is acknowledged to be unprecedented societal change on a global scale.

We will have “smart” homes, “smart” businesses, “smart” highways, “smart” cities and self-driving cars. Virtually everything we own and buy, from refrigerators and washing machines to milk cartons, hairbrushes and infants’ diapers, will contain antennas and microchips and will be connected wirelessly to the Internet. Every person on Earth will have instant access to super-high-speed, low- latency wireless communications from any point on the planet, even in rainforests, mid-ocean and the Antarctic.

What is not widely acknowledged is that this will also result in unprecedented environmental change on a global scale. The planned density of radio frequency transmitters is impossible to envisage. In addition to millions of new 5G base stations on Earth and 20,000 new satellites in space, 200 billion transmitting objects, according to estimates, will be part of the Internet of Things by 2020, and one trillion objects a few years later.

Commercial 5G at lower frequencies and slower speeds was deployed in Qatar, Finland and Estonia in mid-2018. The rollout of 5G at extremely high (millimetre wave) frequencies is planned to begin at the end of 2018.

Despite widespread denial, the evidence that radio frequency (RF) radiation is harmful to life is already overwhelming. The accumulated clinical evidence of sick and injured human beings, experimental evidence of damage to DNA, cells and organ systems in a wide variety of plants and animals, and epidemiological evidence that the major diseases of modern civilization—cancer, heart disease and diabetes—are in large part caused by electromagnetic pollution, forms a literature base of well over 10,000 peer-reviewed studies.

If the telecommunications industry’s plans for 5G come to fruition, no person, no animal, no bird, no insect and no plant on Earth will be able to avoid exposure, 24 hours a day, 365 days a year, to levels of RF radiation that are tens to hundreds of times greater than what exists today, without any possibility of escape anywhere on the planet. These 5G plans threaten to provoke serious, irreversible effects on humans and permanent damage to all of the Earth’s ecosystems.

In 2015, 215 scientists from 41 countries communicated their alarm to the United Nations (UN) and World Health Organization (WHO). They stated that “numerous recent scientific publications have shown that EMF [electromagnetic fields] affects living organisms at levels well below most international and national guidelines”.

Australians, are you excited yet?

SHARE

53 COMMENTS

  2. https://www.sott.net/article/410399-Brussels-becomes-first-major-city-to-halt-5G-rollout-due-to-health-concerns

    Great news. A Belgian government minister has announced that Brussels is halting its 5G plans due to health effects.

    The statement was made by Céline Fremault, the Minister of the Government of the Brussels-Capital Region, responsible for Housing, Quality of Life, Environment and Energy. From an interview last Friday, with L’Echo:

    “I cannot welcome such technology if the radiation standards, which must protect the citizen, are not respected, 5G or not. The people of Brussels are not guinea pigs whose health I can sell at a profit. We cannot leave anything to doubt.”

    • Céline Fremault, Minister of the Government (Brussels-Captial Region), responsible for Housing, Quality of Life, Environment and Energy

    Celine FremaultMs. Fremault accurately identified that a 5G pilot project is not compatible with Belgian radiation safety standards (9 V/m, or 95 mW/m2 according to this online converter), and stated that she does not intend to make an exception. (In the Building Biology guidelines, the threshold for extreme concern is 1 mW/m2. However, many government agencies still only consider thermal effects, instead of the cumulative body of thousands of peer-reviewed scientific studies.)

    Perhaps with Brussels heading up the European Union, and with one of the two major 5G appeals being addressed to the EU, officials there are better informed and motivated to protect themselves.

  3. No wonder Dr Day said there would new and unknown diseases.

    Did he have advanced knowledge of the likely causes?

    Lets add 4G> + vaccines and smart meters, which are yet to come in Aus but soon will, and what might we get? Do they add up to an invisible bio life shortening weapon?

    Add to that the stress of living below the Henderson poverty line for a large subsection of society.

    Does this identify the intended recipients of “new and unknown diseases.” Is this the plan by which some of the agenda 21 or 30 whatever, objectives are intended to be achieved?

    Do they have 5G>+ phone towers, compulsory vaccines in the “affluent side of town?

  4. OFF-TOPIC.

    Tomorrow, April 5, 2019 at 9pm, Dr Russell Pridgeon will find himself at Magiatrate’s court, 363 George St., Brisbane to answer questions or whatever. He is out on bail and the trial date is not set yet

    Will you please all go there, Queenslanders, to show support? He is wrongly charged with helping two children. (Operation Noetic, recall?)

    Recommend you use public transport. I parked a car in a multilevel garage in Brisbane CBD last week for less than 3 hours and the parking fee was a stunning $69.00. (Made me feel RICH.)

    • “to answer questions or whatever”

      So what, exactly, are the legislated requirements of a prosecution in Queensland ?
      Do the Po have to formally put their cards on the table in advance of the trial process ?
      If so, is there a time-limit?
      and how come there’s been zero publicity ?

  5. just listened to report that greater scrutiny to be carried out on implantable devices in humans. This information demands urgent attention before it will be too late as we are now becoming aware of the damage done to many of us because of a rush to market these devices.

  6. What’s the fuss. The astronauts that went to the moon didn’t come back any worse for wear from their exposure to cosmic radiation. Anyway, there’s sure to be a vaccine on the way that can protect us.

  7. Just what a foreign enemy state would want.

    Interesting, then, that Israel will not be adopting 5G. Nor will Donald Trump at Mar-a-lago.

  8. Best laid plans… and all that. My plan to move to Muthamul Homeland, which is four hours drive on dirt road from the nearest village, was intended to place me outside the radiation zone. Looks like 5G would reach me there.

    What with unregulated food toxicity, non-nutritional plant foods, food preservatives and enhancers, vaccines, and murderous cancer treatments, the human species continued existence is becoming uncertain. With political avenues receding rapidly, a people’s coup may soon be the only hope for survival.

    Oh… I forgot, we gave our guns away.

    Somebody up there sure had a lot of forethought.

    • berry, if it’s an antenna pointing at you, and you have appropriate test equipment to detect it, that’s a long way from “no way”. No way implies the thing is completely un-detectable. If it is actively harming you, by definition, it must be detectable in some way, since your own body is “detecting” it as well.

      I think learned helplessness is as bad in these sorts of situations as propaganda. Both poison the mind.

      That NYT article is behind a pay-wall.

    • It seems that because the churches involved are gaining an income from the erection of these towers and because the towers are unobtrusive it appears to be alright, no matter what damage they are doing to the rest of the environment. She’ll be right Jake!

  10. If these idiots in technology, politics and corporations want so much to wipe out people, fauna and flora, why don’t they just go off to some little corner and commit suicide and let the rest of the planet continue on as before? Why do they have to take down everybody and everything with themselves?

    If these new fangle-dangle play toys are so safe, let there be proper scientific test, outside of the industries involved, so that there is no conflict of interest, to prove that fact. This is not allowed before the dangerous goods are on the market, then we are told it is too late to remove them because it will upset the World’s economy. Yeh!

    We have been sold a crock in regard NBN. In my opinion, after being on it for more than 2 years, the performance is no better than the previous “broadband”. In fact I think I had less down time with broadband.

    • Mal, if I had hired these guys to significantly reduce the population, I would be sacking them, and suing them for non-performance-under-contract.

      Even Spanish flu was only 50 million or so.

      I disagree with you that it is too late to “remove them”. Anyone so motivated could “remove them” anywhere in the world.

  12. Re the 3rd paragraph of the Firstenberg letter I’d have to say that such an ill-conceived plan, by it’s very nature, would be at odds with such organisation/methodology.

    One look at the so-called NBN roll-out is enough to know that we’re not really up against anything more than a thinly disguised business scam, as summed up by Aussiemal’s observations. Dealing with it as such might be a time-consuming pain, but from what I’ve seen none of the players seem to have any back-bone.

    What interests me is that numerous protest stories can be found online:
    https://www.communitynews.com.au/avon-valley-gazette/news/stoneville-nbn-rollout-sparks-towering-protest/

    http://echonewspaper.com.au/nbn-tower-invasion/

    https://delimiter.com.au/2013/01/24/nbn-tower-life-threatening-claim-residents/

    http://www.svgazette.com.au/nbn-wireless-towers-what-are-the-risks/

    https://www.sunshinecoastdaily.com.au/news/anger-grows-over-nbn-tower-plan-for-weyba-downs/3326434/

    https://www.itnews.com.au/news/blood-tests-sent-to-nbn-co-to-thwart-tower-plans-400543

    But there’s virtually no coverage on outcomes

  13. They already know the dangers of 5G. It is just another silent weapon against humanity along with the other vast array of silent weapons that have been used for decades.

    People forget about radiation from the hundreds of nuclear bombs that have been activated and released into the atmosphere. The radiation is still there it has not gone away……What do you think many of these cancers and leukemia are from?

    Worldwide Effects of Nuclear War Radioactive Fallout Excerpts only click on link for full article
    http://www.atomicarchive.com/Docs/Effects/wenw_chp2.shtml
    Cancers and genetics effects that are “unexplainable” from medicines point of view!
    This means that between 3 and 50 persons per billion births in the post-testing generation will have genetic damage for each megaton of nuclear yield exploded. With similar uncertainty, it is possible to estimate that the induction of cancers would range from 75 to 300 cases per megaton for each billion people in the post-test generation.

    If we apply these very rough yardsticks to a large-scale nuclear war in which 10,000 megatons of nuclear force are detonated, the effects on a world population of 5 billion appear enormous. Allowing for uncertainties about the dynamics of a possible nuclear war, radiation-induced cancers and genetic damage together over 30 years are estimated to range from 1.5 to 30 million for the world population as a whole. This would mean one additional case for every 100 to 3,000 people or about 1/2 percent to 15 percent of the estimated peacetime cancer death rate in developed countries. As will be seen, moreover, there could be other, less well understood effects which would drastically increase suffering and death.

    A. High Altitude Dust

    It has been estimated that a 10,000-megaton war with half the weapons exploding at ground level would tear up some 25 billion cubic meters of rock and soil, injecting a substantial amount of fine dust and particles into the stratosphere. This is roughly twice the volume of material blasted loose by the Indonesian volcano, Krakatoa, whose explosion in 1883 was the most powerful terrestrial event ever recorded. Sunsets around the world were noticeably reddened for several years after the Krakatoa eruption, indicating that large amounts of volcanic dust had entered the stratosphere.

    Subsequent studies of large volcanic explosions, such as Mt. Agung on Bali in 1963, have raised the possibility that large-scale injection of dust into the stratosphere would reduce sunlight intensities and temperatures at the surface, while increasing the absorption of heat in the upper atmosphere.

    The resultant minor changes in temperature and sunlight could affect crop production. However, no catastrophic worldwide changes have resulted from volcanic explosions, so it is doubtful that the gross injection of particulates into the stratosphere by a 10,000-megaton conflict would, by itself, lead to major global climate changes.

    B. Ozone

    More worrisome is the possible effect of nuclear explosions on ozone in the stratosphere. Not until the 20th century was the unique and paradoxical role of ozone fully recognized. On the other hand, in concentrations greater than I part per million in the air we breathe, ozone is toxic; one major American city, Los Angeles, has established a procedure for ozone alerts and warnings. On the other hand, ozone is a critically important feature of the stratosphere from the standpoint of maintaining life on the earth.

    The reason is that while oxygen and nitrogen in the upper reaches of the atmosphere can block out solar ultraviolet photons with wavelengths shorter than 2,420 angstroms (Å), ozone is the only effective shield in the atmosphere against solar ultraviolet radiation between 2,500 and 3,000 Å in wavelength. (See note 5.) Although ozone is extremely efficient at filtering out solar ultraviolet in 2,500-3,OOO Å region of the spectrum, some does get through at the higher end of the spectrum. Ultraviolet rays in the range of 2,800 to 3,200 Å which cause sunburn, prematurely age human skin and produce skin cancers. As early as 1840, arctic snow blindness was attributed to solar ultraviolet; and we have since found that intense ultraviolet radiation can inhibit photosynthesis in plants, stunt plant growth, damage bacteria, fungi, higher plants, insects and annuals, and produce genetic alterations.

    The mechanism for the production of ozone is the absorption by oxygen molecules (O2) of relatively short-wavelength ultraviolet light. The oxygen molecule separates into two atoms of free oxygen, which immediately unite with other oxygen molecules on the surfaces of particles in the upper atmosphere. It is this union which forms ozone, or O3. The heat released by the ozone-forming process is the reason for the curious increase with altitude of the temperature of the stratosphere (the base of which is about 36,000 feet above the earth’s surface).

    While the natural chemical reaction produces about 4,500 tons of ozone per second in the stratosphere, this is offset by other natural chemical reactions which break down the ozone. By far the most significant involves nitric oxide (NO) which breaks ozone (O3) into molecules. This effect was discovered only in the last few years in studies of the environmental problems which might be encountered if large fleets of supersonic transport aircraft operate routinely in the lower stratosphere. According to a report by Dr. Harold S. Johnston, University of California at Berkeley– prepared for the Department of Transportation’s Climatic Impact Assessment Program–it now appears that the NO reaction is normally responsible for 50 to 70 percent of the destruction of ozone.

    It is because of this catalytic role which nitric oxide plays in the destruction of ozone that it is important to consider the effects of high-yield nuclear explosions on the ozone layer. The nuclear fireball and the air entrained within it are subjected to great heat, followed by relatively rapid cooling. These conditions are ideal for the production of tremendous amounts of NO from the air. It has been estimated that as much as 5,000 tons of nitric oxide is produced for each megaton of nuclear explosive power.
    What would be the effects of nitric oxides driven into the stratosphere by an all-out nuclear war, involving the detonation of 10,000 megatons of explosive force in the northern hemisphere? According to the recent National Academy of Sciences study, the nitric oxide produced by the weapons could reduce the ozone levels in the northern hemisphere by as much as 30 to 70 percent.

    To begin with, a depleted ozone layer would reflect back to the earth’s surface less heat than would normally be the case, thus causing a drop in temperature–perhaps enough to produce serious effects on agriculture. Other changes, such as increased amounts of dust or different vegetation, might subsequently reverse this drop in temperature–but on the other hand, it might increase it.

    Probably more important, life on earth has largely evolved within the protective ozone shield and is presently adapted rather precisely to the amount of solar ultraviolet which does get through. To defend themselves against this low level of ultraviolet, evolved external shielding (feathers, fur, cuticular waxes on fruit), internal shielding (melanin pigment in human skin, flavenoids in plant tissue), avoidance strategies (plankton migration to greater depths in the daytime, shade-seeking by desert iguanas) and, in almost all organisms but placental mammals, elaborate mechanisms to repair photochemical damage.

    It is possible, however, that a major increase in solar ultraviolet might overwhelm the defenses of some and perhaps many terrestrial life forms. Both direct and indirect damage would then occur among the bacteria, insects, plants, and other links in the ecosystems on which human well-being depends. This disruption, particularly if it occurred in the aftermath of a major war involving many other dislocations, could pose a serious additional threat to the recovery of postwar society. The National Academy of Sciences report concludes that in 20 years the ecological systems would have essentially recovered from the increase in ultraviolet radiation–though not necessarily from radioactivity or other damage in areas close to the war zone. However, a delayed effect of the increase in ultraviolet radiation would be an estimated 3 to 30 percent increase in skin cancer for 40 years in the Northern Hemisphere’s mid-latitudes.

    The concept of “half-life” is basic to an understanding of radioactive decay of unstable nuclei. Unlike physical “systems” — bacteria, animals, men and stars — unstable isotopes do not individually have a predictable life span. There is no way of forecasting when a single unstable nucleus will decay.

    Nevertheless, it is possible to get around the random behavior of an individual nucleus by dealing statistically with large numbers of nuclei of a particular radioactive isotope. In the case of thorium-232, for example, radioactive decay proceeds so slowly that 14 billion years must elapse before one-half of an initial quantity decayed to a more stable configuration. Thus the half-life of this isotope is 14 billion years. After the elapse of second half-life (another 14 billion years), only one-fourth of the original quantity of thorium-232 would remain, one eighth after the third half-life, and so on.

    Most manmade radioactive isotopes have much shorter half-lives, ranging from seconds or days up to thousands of years. Plutonium-239 (a manmade isotope) has a half-life of 24,000 years. For the most common uranium isotope, U-238, the half-life is 4.5 billion years, about the age of the solar system. The much scarcer, fissionable isotope of uranium, U-235, has a half-life of 700 million years, indicating that its present abundance is only about 1 percent of the amount present when the solar system was born.

    Oxygen, vital to breathing creatures, constitutes about one-fifth of the earth’s atmosphere. It occasionally occurs as a single atom in the atmosphere at high temperature, but it usually combines with a second oxygen atom to form molecular oxygen (O2). The oxygen in the air we breathe consists primarily of this stable form. Oxygen has also a third chemical form in which three oxygen atoms are bound together in a single molecule (03), called ozone. Though less stable and far more rare than O2, and principally confined to upper levels of the stratosphere, both molecular oxygen and ozone play a vital role in shielding the earth from harmful components of solar radiation.

    Most harmful radiation is in the “ultraviolet” region of the solar spectrum, invisible to the eye at short wavelengths (under 3,000 Å). (An angstrom unit–Å–is an exceedingly short unit of length–10 billionths of a centimeter, or about 4 billionths of an inch.) Unlike X-rays, ultraviolet photons are not “hard” enough to ionize atoms, but pack enough energy to break down the chemical bonds of molecules in living cells and produce a variety of biological and genetic abnormalities, including tumors and cancers.

    Fortunately, because of the earth’s atmosphere, only a trace of this dangerous ultraviolet radiation actually reaches the earth. By the time sunlight reaches the top of the stratosphere, at about 30 miles altitude, almost all the radiation shorter than 1,900 Å has been absorbed by molecules of nitrogen and oxygen. Within the stratosphere itself, molecular oxygen (02) absorbs the longer wavelengths of ultraviolet, up to 2,420 Å; and ozone (O3) is formed as a result of this absorption process.

    It is this ozone then which absorbs almost all of the remaining ultraviolet wavelengths up to about 3,000 Å, so that almost all of the dangerous solar radiation is cut off before it reaches the earth’s surface.

    Effects of Nuclear Weapons

    Effects of Nuclear Weapons Detonations
    What are blast effects?
    What are thermal effects?
    What are radiation effects?
    What are electromagnetic effects (Electromagnetic Pulse or EMP)?
    What are the effects on climate?
    http://www.nucleardarkness.org/nuclear/effectsofnuclearweapons/
    “We have no idea what the long-term genetic consequences will be from the massive release of radioactive fallout on a world-wide basis.”

  14. These evil sadistic and insane megalomaniacs are long range planners.
    The global health effects of nuclear war ://www.uow.edu.au/~bmartin/pubs/82cab/
    on Australia

    The available evidence suggests that the global health effects of a major nuclear war are likely to be much less devastating than the immediate effects of blast, heat and local fallout. Present knowledge indicates that a large nuclear war in the northern hemisphere would have the following effects on Australia:

    from fallout, death of perhaps 1000 people from cancers and genetic defects over 50 years;[42]
    from changes in ozone, a negligible effect;
    from climatic changes, a tiny chance of any effect;
    from fires, a negligible effect.
    But this conclusion does not mean that the global effects should be ignored by Australians.

    First, many people will die worldwide from cancers and genetic defects caused by global fallout, and possibly from other global effects. Whether the total is 10,000 or 10,000,000, the suffering and death will be real for those who experience it, and should not be discounted by use of comparisons. Second, there does exist a chance that major climatic changes, alterations in agricultural productivity, or consequences for global ecology could result from nuclear war.

    Nuclear Radiation Affecting Metallurgy in Reactors and Airplanes Wigner Part 2
    Metal embrittlement

    The Wigner Effect youtube Leuren Moret
    https://www.google.com.au/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=the+Wigner+effect+youtubeLeuren+Moret+
    She is well qualified, well spoken and gives the history behind many talks

    The Wigner Effect From Radiation Youtube
    https://www.google.com.au/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=the+Wigner+effect+youtube

  15. Re the 3rd paragraph of the Firstenberg letter I’d have to say that such an ill-conceived plan, by it’s very nature, would be at odds with such organisation/methodology.

    One look at the so-called NBN roll-out is enough to know that we’re not really up against anything more than a thinly disguised business scam, as summed up by Aussiemal’s observations. Dealing with it as such might be a time-consuming pain, but from what I’ve seen none of the players seem to have any back-bone.

    What interests me is that numerous protest stories can be found online(tried to post some links but they were rejected) but virtually no coverage on outcomes

    • Dianne
      When the long established therapy of acupuncture commenced, the medial associations and doctors went absolutely ballistic and hysterical!!! Of course it was continuously fed by the prostitute media and press for several years…Eventually a few medicos commenced training in acupuncture and then it was ok as they called it ‘medical acupuncture. Lol

      Thanks for your background of the “Margaret Cole House- was named after a Mrs Margaret Cole she was a council member of the Tavistock Clinic 1945-8.”

      • Dianne
        FYI medicine is the third largest killer in the US! With you knowledge and background Im sure you are aware of this. 🙂
        Medical journals report that pharmaceutical-based medicine is one of the leading causes of death & injury in developed countries. Australia is very dishonest about its statistics. We have to go to the US, Europe, Canada or Sweden for honest statistics

        https://medicinekillsmillions.com
        https://www.abc.net.au/4corners/four-corners/3974354
        https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/267432/socialized-medicine-kills-daniel-greenfield
        http://www.webdc.com/pdfs/deathbymedicine.pdf
        MEDICAL INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX: The $ickness Industry, Big Pharma and Suppressed Cures (The Underground Knowledge Series Book 3) Kindle Edition
        https://www.amazon.com.au/MEDICAL-INDUSTRIAL-COMPLEX-Suppressed-Underground-ebook/dp/B00Y8Y3TUM

        “The Drugs Don’t Work”: How the Medical-Industrial Complex Systematically Suppresses Negative Studies
        https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2012/09/the-drugs-dont-work-how-the-medical-industrial-complex-systematically-suppresses-negative-studies.html

        Inter-capitalistic disputes biomedicalization and hegemonic medical model
        http://www.scielo.br/pdf/icse/2017nahead/en_1807-5762-icse-1807-576220160808.pdf

        “MEDICAL MAFIA, BIG PHARMA”
        http://www.whale.to/a/allopathy_h.html

        The Medical–Industrial Complex Professional Medical Associations and Continuing Medical Education
        https://academic.oup.com/painmedicine/article/12/12/1713/1845598/The-Medical-Industrial-Complex-Professional

        Consultation or corruption? The ethics of signing on to the medical-industrial complex
        http://www.jvascsurg.org/article/S0741-5214(05)01722-2/fulltext

        http://www.creativeresistance.org/tpp-and-the-medical-industrial-complex/
        If signed in its current form, the TPP—a far-reaching trade agreement involving the US and 11 other Pacific-Rim countries—would force all countries to grant additional drug patents, extending monopolies on medicines beyond 20 years, a practice called patent “evergreening.”
        The agreement would also impose an unprecedented extended period of exclusivity for clinical data required to prove the safety and efficacy of drugs and vaccines that are “biologic” products, extending monopolies in TPP countries, which will delay lower-cost versions of these medicines from entering the market.

        Wasted
        http://www.abc.net.au/4corners/wasted-promo/6804372

        Wasted: the unnecessary testing and treatments choking the health system and making patients ill. It is to the tune of $86,000,000,000.00 annually!

        Patients at risk and billions of dollars being wasted because of tests scans and procedures that don’t work
        http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-09-28/tests-treatments-for-common-ailments-costing-billions-4-corners/6799378
        It obviously has become milking cow or the pigs in the trough!

        Four Corners – “WASTED – The real story behind the malaise in the Australian health system”
        https://www.huntergpa.org/news/four-corners-wasted-the-real-story-behind-the-malaise-in-the-australian-health-system
        Four Corners went to air on Monday 28th September with a special edition by Dr Norman Swan, finding, “…billions of dollars being squandered and more than a hundred inappropriate tests and procedures receiving Medicare rebates.”

        The key findings of the report were that:
        Nearly one third of the almost $155 billion spent on health every year is being wasted – about $46 billion
        Since GPs were given permission to order MRI knee scans three years ago, the number of scans has gone from zero to over 150,000 in the last year. It’s estimated that at least 50% of them are unnecessary.
        Knee replacements cost up to $23,500 per procedure and last year cost the public and private health systems more than a billion dollars – not far short of an astounding 1% of the national spend on health. About 20% of them may be unnecessary.
        The costs of back pain imaging are extraordinary – about a billion dollars over the last ten years. That doesn’t include the costs from public hospitals, but most are done in the private sector.
        At least half of all back scans and X-rays are of no value – that’s half a billion dollars that could have been saved in the last 10 years. That could buy a regionally delivered suicide prevention programme, which could save a thousand lives a year.
        Spinal fusion operations, mostly performed in private hospitals, cost about $2.3 billion over the last ten years. It’s estimated that 50% of this is needless.

        http://www.lessismoremedicine.com/blog/video-wasted-waste-and-harm-and-unnecessary-tests-four-corners
        In just 45 minutes, the problem of overdiagnosis, overtesting, and overtreatment is clearly summarized using examples from the Australian system. The costs and harms to patients are incredible, and an analogy – taking the wrong train and winding up where you never intended – is an effective illustration of the issues.

        Some key messages:

        Billions of dollars are spent on procedures that are not needed, simply because patients expect them and because doctors continue to lobby to be paid to do their ‘favourite’ procedures.

        What is your estimate of how many of those knee arthroscopies are unnecessary? – Dr Normal Swann, Interviewer
        Uh, I would say, at least half. – Dr. Ian Harris, orthopedic surgeon
        This is no surprise. Dr James Rickert has been advocating for more appropriate care in orthopaedics, for example with an alternative Choosing Wisely list (despite what the article says, not just ‘one guy’s opinion’ but rather a summary based on the best available evidence, presented most recently at Preventing Overdiagnosis), for years. But conflict of interest, particularly in industry lobbying and influence in the creation of guidelines, continues to be a problem. So does fee-for-service payment systems which encourage higher throughput rather than best care.

        There are other pressures too:

        Often the best medicine is no medicine at all, or the best intervention is no intervention at all. But those conversations with patients that take that time to explain that the evidence simply doesn’t support doing a test or prescribing a drug – are long conversations and it’s much easier in clinical practice to do things quickly and prescribe or order a test. – Dr Rachelle Buchbinder, rheumatologist

        ABC Four Corners ‘Wasted’ program sparks conversation about health care

        Now is the time for a national conversation about appropriate health care
        http://www.choosingwisely.org.au/news-and-media/media-centre/abc-four-corners-wasted-sparks-conversation

        Jon Rappoport interview of ex vaccine researcher
        http://healthmaven.blogspot.com.au/2010_09_26_archive.html
        “At the highest levels of the medical cartel, vaccines are a top priority because they cause a weakening of the immune system. I know that may be hard to accept, but it’s true. The medical cartel, at the highest level, is not out to help people, it is out to harm them, to weaken them. To kill them.”
        2001

        ‘Drug companies are not here to bring health to the population but to scam them on one level for vast amounts of money
        by treating the symptoms and not addressing the cause.’
        -Sir William Ossler
        1849-1919

        “Over and over I explain to patients, ‘Your pain, misery and illness results from your own dietary mistakes and drugs. You are suffering because you are filled with toxic wastes caused by your diet of poorly selected food filled with artificial flavorings, preservatives, synthetics, and over-processed ingredients—too much stimulating food and too few natural vitamins from vegetables and fruits….’ ”
        Henry G. Bieler
        MD
        Food is Your Best Medicine

        “When the government has the power to make medical decisions for us, we, in essence, accept that the state owns our bodies.”
        –US Congressional Representative Ron Paul

        “If we doctors threw all our medicines into the sea, it would be that much better for our patients and that much worse for the fishes.”
        — Oliver Wendell Holmes
        M.D.

        “At present, intelligent people do not have their children vaccinated, nor does the law now compel them to. The result is not, as the Jennerians prophesied, the extermination of the human race by smallpox; on the contrary more people are now killed by vaccination than by smallpox.”
        “August 9, 1944, the Irish Times”

        Silenced Witnesses MMR A Jab Too Far. The Parents’ Story
        The Denial of Vaccine Damage by Government Corporations and the Media.
        https://avn.org.au/shop/autism-add-and-behavioural-problems-books/silenced-witnesses-vol-1-2/
        https://www.amazon.com/Silenced-Witnesses-Parents-Government-Corporations/dp/0951964666

        The Medical Mafia – FDA AMA And Big Pharma : “21st Century Cures Act” Is Their New Constitution
        https://grandmageri422.me/2017/03/27/the-medical-mafia-fda-ama-and-big-pharma-21st-century-cures-act-is-their-new-constitution/

  17. Thanks Mary–Professor Wong Traditional Chinese Medicine Northcote Melbourne set up a clinic many years ago with exactly that intention. The western medicine training hospital was to be The Alfred Hospital in Prahran–but to no avail. In fact there was clear opposition particularly from Medical and pharmaceutical companies- to close down such traditional practices. I was a patient /student of Prof Wong -a brilliant man- an amazing life and legacy.

    Interestingly when I was researching my medical history I discovered that the Maternity Ward at the Alfred -Margaret Cole House- was named after a Mrs Margaret Cole she was a council member of the Tavistock Clinic 1945-8.
    As I say all roads– — go via the Tavi–or did you say that Mary

    was watching Cathi Morgans more recent videos with her survivor friend –and although they are poor quality and a bit of a challenge to follow for the “uninitiated” they are essential viewing for those doing research and those living with programming and those trying to learn the truth about global manipulation of the mind.

    https://cathki.wordpress.com

    Interestingly Cathi references Steve Murray’s work– I linked the two so something must be coming together. And of course Steve’s work is about Fiona’s testimony and my work is linked with Wendy Hoffman –and of course Mary and Dee and well so many gumshoe-ers-

    I went and saw Nicole Kidman’s film Destroyer–very triggering–very targeted–subliminal messages– very mkultra–interesting timing–with global events- all part of the script

    • My terrible timing when I looked at my post after yours,
      The “parallel” with the paparazzi on the news agents billboards, endless displays in thirty years. With a good gumshoe at these same celebrities never stops to amaze me.
      All in plain sight too.

  18. For balance, the upside:

    Got appendicitis at a remote truck stop in NW Australia. Little robot on the wall replacing that ol refibulator. Within a minute the best qualified doctor on the East Coast(after hours Bali backpackers .. then so on, follow the sun we used to call it),. has u on the table , digital manipulation at the highest speed… saved “””yeahhh”.

    Download 10 blueray dvd’s at once.

    Endless possibilities, endless something, it escapes me for now.

    • “We worked, I guess, in different ethical times with different ethical standards. But the work that was done here was very valuable in terms of animal nutrition and crop production.”

      v e r r r r y interesting link.

      Ta.

  21. The Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) is an independent Australian federal government agency responsible for scientific research. Its chief role is to improve the economic and social performance of industry for the benefit of the community.

    CSIRO works with leading organisations around the world. From its headquarters in Canberra, CSIRO maintains more than 50 sites across Australia and in France, Chile and the United States, employing about 5500 people.

    • Diane
      I struggle with the concept of the Independence of “The Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) is an independent Australian federal government agency. How can it be truly “independent” when it is a government agency?

      • Arlyn -it is truly not–I lifted the statement re CSIRO from web site –to respond to Simon’s question–should have used quotation marks.

        Tavistock the “Mother of all Think Tanks”–part of the social engineering plan to control policy–the Tavistock Agenda–setting up Tavistock Nodes around the world after ww2, when the US, CIA influenced policy to suit the NWO agenda. Unilevers played a pivotal role in the initial set up of these nodes in Australia [along with Shell Ford Rice Foundation etc etc ]and provided leadership professional learning courses etc to train Bureaucrats to put the policies into the system. A big story not well understood.

        Below a couple of relevant quotes from Sharon Beder’s link below.

        “A number of Australian think tanks are modelled on US think tanks and have close ties with some of them, including the Heritage Foundation, the Cato Institute and the American Enterprise Institute. The Institute of Public Policy, now amalgamated with the IPA, modelled itself on the Heritage Foundation as well as the British IEA. The Committee for Economic Development in Australia (CEDA) was originally modelled on the US Committee for Economic Development and in 1984 it made a conscious decision to move towards an American Enterprise Institute (AEI) model.”

        “In Australia the largest think tank is the Sydney-based Centre for Independent Studies (CIS), established in 1976. Although it claims to be independent the Centre is funded by businesses, and its work is shaped by its libertarian/laissez faire philosophy. It is, in its own words, committed to ‘an economy based on free and competitive markets’; and ‘individual liberty and choice’ including ‘the right to property’.

        The Centre deals with ‘practical public policy issues’ as well as ‘more intellectual issues focussing on the way societies work and the importance of liberty in securing prosperity both economically and socially’. It publishes the work of various conservatives, including media baron Rupert Murdoch; economists such as Friedrich von Hayek (whom the Centre brought out to Australia in the 1970s) and Milton Friedman; Nick Greiner, a former premier of NSW, Gary Sturgess former Director-General of the NSW Cabinet Office under Greiner, and various think tank scholars from the US and the UK. It also distributes, in Australia, material from US and UK libertarian think tanks.

        Another prominent Australian conservative think tank, and the oldest, is the Institute of Public Affairs (IPA). The IPA describes itself as ‘a political organisation in the sense that it influences the political agenda’ but claims that it ‘avoids political-party partisanship’. It stands for, among other things, ‘less regulation and smaller government generally’ and ‘rational economic policies’.

        Almost one third of IPA’s $1.5 million annual budget comes from mining and manufacturing companies. It has 700 corporate members and 3000 individual members, some of whom are subscribers to its various publications. Its council has included Murdoch as well as other conservative business leaders. Like many of the US conservative think tanks, the IPA has good connections in the media via right-wing commentators with regular columns in major newspapers. It also has good political connections. Its staff includes former senior public officials and former politicians. John Stone, a former Secretary of the Treasury, is a consultant to the IPA and Dame Leonie Kramer, Chancellor of the University of Sydney, has headed one of the IPA’s units. The IPA’s current units are on Deregulation, Economic Policy, Indigenous Issues and Environmental Policy.”

    • I was involved with the biodiesel industry and there was a conference of stakeholders to discuss the recent CSIRO research on biodiesel. We were surprised to see that the ‘independent’ CSIRO was fiddling the numbers just like any other corrupt government body.

      • Terry
        Yes the Australian Institute of Criminology has done the same with fiddling the statistics. Honest and dependable statistics must be suppressed and hidden from the public for their own devious agendas.

        “But I suppose the most revolutionary act one can engage in is to tell the truth.”
        Howard Zinn

        In a time of universal deceit – telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
        George Orwell

  22. A little more about CSIRO– and its history—-Tavistock Think Tanks–

    Brian Tucker, previously Chief of the CSIRO Division of Atmospheric research, is now a Senior Fellow at the IPA where he trades on his scientific credentials to push an ideological agenda.

    The Intellectual Sorcery of Think Tanks

    Sharon Beder

    https://www.uow.edu.au/~sharonb/tanks.html

    • A great article by Sharon. The Wollongong University put out some great articles over the years. Another good guy is Brian Martin and his articles.

      • These ‘Think Tanks’ subjugate democracy and the will of its country’s nationals. The same goes for the ‘Foundations’

  23. Australia’s Science Channel writes: “Much to the excitement of Australians, solid plans to roll out fast 5G mobile communication technology were announced in 2018.”

    These ‘announcements’ or edicts by ‘government funded agencies’ or ‘politicians’ it their 10 second sound-byte are not reality and certainly not what Australians think and believe. It is all part of the psychops against the Australian people to manufacture consent and not realising any of the harmful and damages effects on the human organism. It is worse than malfeasance it is as it should be Malfeasance in Office, lack of duty of care and negligence for starters.

    It would be good to trace the bribes tot hose who have approved this sinister program of Crimes against humanity. in the silent war agendas. They have completely ignored the Precautionary Principle for money.

    The mission of this website is to promote the understanding and implementation of the Precautionary Principle for the management of new and emerging risks.
    The Precautionary Principle is a strategy to cope with possible risks where scientific understanding is yet incomplete, such as the risks of nano technology, genetically modified organisms and systemic insecticides.

    http://www.precautionaryprinciple.eu
    The Precautionary Principle is defined as follows:
    When human activities may lead to morally unacceptable harm that is scientifically plausible but uncertain, actions shall be taken to avoid or diminish that harm. Morally unacceptable harm refers to harm to humans or the environment that is

    threatening to human life or health, or
    serious and effectively irreversible, or
    inequitable to present or future generations, or
    imposed without adequate consideration of the human rights of those affected.
    The judgement of plausibility should be grounded in scientific analysis. Analysis should be ongoing so that chosen actions are subject to review. Uncertainty may apply to, but need not be limited to, causality or the bounds of the possible harm.
    Actions are interventions that are undertaken before harm occurs that seek to avoid or diminish the harm. Actions should be chosen that are proportional to the seriousness of the potential harm, with consideration of their positive and negative consequences, and with an assessment of the moral implications of both action and inaction. The choice of action should be the result of a participatory process.

  25. Hi, I believe that urgently Australians who are aware of the risks of exposure to high density RF Microwave Radiation should come together politically and get into government to prevent this catastrophe for people and nature.

    We have a base station 300m from us that has been ramped up and now many around us, including my family are ill with Microwave sickness. The lady across the road has blood cancer, the lady on the corner alzheimers, the children down the road headaches, the man on the corner acloser has chronic heart conditions, everyone is exhausted on top of this. We are showing all of Australia what you too will feel if 5G is rolled out.

    The density of the exposure is the problem and 5G will bring what we are experiencing to your doors too.

    Lower density means less exposure. Australia’s health limit is around 1000uWatts/cm2 whilst China, Russia, Poland, Switzerland and more is 10uWatts/cm2. Their rate of Leukaemia and Non -hodgkins is respectively half and one third of ours.

    Our exposure limit must reduce to 10uW/cm2 or lower.

    Our politicians either don’t get it or don’t care, either way, the public is constantly misled by the psychology department at University of Wollongong and Arpansa and ICNIRP, all devoid of a single physician. The Doctor this and that in these groups stands for Doctor of Philosophy.

    Read the United Nations and WHO publication ‘Environmental Health Criteria 16’ there is a bucket load of peer reviewed evidence of damage due to microwave below the effects of heating. This was well known way before the ‘spin’ of the telecommunication industry.

    Our government allows through Arpansa a spike of 1000 x the max limit. That is right a spike of 1000 x 1000uWatts/cm2. Compare this to China’s limit of 10uW/cm2 and yes China does indeed have wifi and mobiles.

    Now compare that density to Poland’s density levels, whereby some zones are allowed for some of the day, right through to zones that people should never enter. 1000uW and above is described as “hazardous zone.” Poland and similar countries are the ones that have actually conducted the most research and that is irrefutable. Poland’s safe limit for 24 hrs is also 10uW/cm2.

    Regarding nature – at our house since the recent Base Station ‘upgrades’ we have no flies, mosquitos, bees die in our yard, the birds have gone, no bees/ insects on plants, no spiders. Who has tested that the 70uWatts/cm2 that the Base Station near us is pumping out is ‘safe’ for nature? I’ve also seen small skinks just standing in the open not moving – like they are stunned. This action by our government is the worst I could possibly imagine.

    How can we change what the country is heading for – I would do anything to stop this senseless action.

    This is coming to everyone’s door via 5G.

    I have a web site that provides factual information -for free. Industry pays for their info spread.

    https://www.rfhealthadvisory.com.au

    Angela

C'mon Leave a Reply, Debate and Add to the Discussion

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.