Home Earth/ Climate The Real Climate Story, Part 5: Climate Scientist Caught Lying To Australian...

The Real Climate Story, Part 5: Climate Scientist Caught Lying To Australian Public.

46

by Gil May

This article, part 5, is about a Climate Scientist caught lying to the Australian public. (See video below.)

IPCC Predictions

Not one of the 31 DOOMSDAY PREDICTIONS made by the IPCC about the effects of global warming has eventuated – everyone was wrong.

  1. They are still recycling the same old ignorant predictions even though they have not eventuated.
  1. The oceans have NOT risen since records began. see BOM report Fort Denison and many others.
  1. The World average temperature has NOT gone up. It has drifted down slightly over the last 25 years.

  1. The polar bear population has increased by 15%, there are so many they pose a danger to humans. Ask any Canadian or Alaskan.
  1. The polar caps continually change with the season and the Antarctic cap is the largest it has been for a long time.
  1. Even though the Barrier reef has suffered the Crown of Thorns plague, it is still in excellent condition.
  1. BOM reports will show that overall Cyclones and storms have diminished in intensity and occurrence.
  1. The Quaternary Glaciation is still in progress since 2.58 million years ago with the Earth now experiencing an Interglacial period with more Ice Ages in the future.
  1. Glaciers are a carryover from the last ice age and have been melting before Captain cook entered Glacier bay where the glaciers were fifteen kilometres further down the bay.
  1. The Himalayas have not melted, and the Amazon is thriving. Apart from the decimation of the forests by land clearing. The same applies in Indonesia. What is happening in both is terrible.
  1. The hundreds of thousands of people who would starve to death of course never occurred and food production has continued to grow throughout the World.

FACT: “CO2 CLOSE TO LOWEST LEVELS EVER FOR OUR PLANET”

Climate Change Mythology IS OVER.

The Climate Has Never Stopped Changing Since Time Began And Never Will.

So why are we spending billions on renewables that can never be cost-effective?

THESE CLIMATE CHANGE GRAPHS – SHOW HOW IT REALLY WORKS

Historic climatic fluctuations show we are still within the normal range

https://www.iceagenow.info/global-warming-%E2%80%9Cunprecedented/

Carbon Dioxide is the lowest in 600 million years. Plants flourish best at 1,200 ppm, which is the average level of the last 300 million years.

THE COMPARISON OF HISTORICAL ATMOSPHERIC CO2 GRAPH

This chart below was sourced from the Intergovernmental Panel On Climate Change (IPCC) and the US Government National Oceanic and Atmosphere Administration (NOAA = BOM)

(NOAA)

Now let’s zoom out and look at the entire full big picture where we can see the entire timeline from 570 million years ago to the present day, this ‘official chart’ sourced from the IPCC and NOAA show the CO2 was actually almost 8,000 ppm roughly 520 million years ago, all before the industrial revolution and before humans, and this chart is honest as it starts at zero ppm in the bottom LH corner.  So how did it get to that point long before humans, clearly the planet did it all by itself?

if you understand the BIG picture look at the bottom RH corner and you see the CO2 is near the lowest it has ever been in this time period for which we have data. Now you see why the climate change alarmists do not want to show you this graph, for the ‘dot’ in the bottom RH corner represents the present CO2 that we know.

This IPCC graph clearly shows that CO2 was actually 8,000 ppm roughly 520 million years ago and from 1,000 to 5,000 ppm are normal fluctuations.

As you can see here CO2 levels have been much, much higher in the past, not just 2,000 ppm or 5,000 ppm but 7,000 and 8,000 ppm which all happened long before the industrial revolution, humans did not exist 520 m years ago.

If Global warming was caused by humans how did CO2 get to almost 8,000 ppm 520 M years ago?

Note: The vertical axis (LH bottom corner) of the above chart starts at zero so you can see the entire big picture, you can see where CO2 levels have been before and where they are now, the more you see of the big picture you can see the CO2 levels now are at almost the very lowest level they have ever been in the known history of our planet.

CO2 almost at the lowest level ever recorded for our planet.

The Climate change alarmist will never show you this factual history, they want you to see their selected section of the charts below that never starts at zero thus presenting a false picture from 1960 to the present or their other one from 1750 to today. They hide the entire big chart we have just been looking at, from 570 million years ago to the present, because that chart shows human activity could not possibly be the only cause of CO2.

THE CLIMATE CHANGE ALARMISTS MYTHOLOGY GRAPHS HEREUNDER

        https://scripps.ucsd.edu/programs/keelingcurve/co2-graphs/

The following graph shows atmospheric CO2 levels over the last 10,000 years. It includes ice core data for CO2 levels before 1950. For values after 1950, direct measurements from Mauna Loa, Hawaii were used.

https://skepticalscience.com/co2-measurements-uncertainty.htm

http://myrenaultzoe.com/index.php/2013/05/remember-today-earths-co2-level-passes-400-ppm/

Here is what they want you to see and be alarmed about—look at the terrible rise in CO2. The chart does not start at Zero to deliberately mislead you. A great alarmist’s tool to deliberately mislead and deceive your thinking.

Look where the graph line started at 265 ppm on the bottom LH corner in above graphs and RH corner in the one below and finished at 380 ppm on the RH corner. A rise of 115 ppm is a very minor movement on a global history scale where it has been up to 8,000 ppm.

In hard science journals, the graph above would be considered dishonest, because the y-axis starts at 290 instead of zero. This misleads the reader into thinking that CO2 levels have undergone a huge increase when in fact, CO2 levels have only increased by 23.7% or since 1900. When the data are plotted honestly, with the y-axis starting at zero, the true minor scope of the 380 ppm change becomes clear.

According to the US Department of Energy, about 14.8% of the total CO2 is man-made. The remainder is caused by natural forces, such as volcanoes, deep-sea vents, and forest fires.

At the current rate of increase, CO2 will not double its current level until 2255. At 760 ppm it would still be within earth’s normal range, in the last 300 million years the average level of atmospheric CO2 was approximately 1,200 ppm.

Fanatical climatologists and alarmists have used trickery and gross exaggeration to justify their doomsday nonsense and create a political issue costing millions of wasted dollars and extreme hardship on many people.   The lack of discernment and analytical ability has created a fanatical ‘Climatology’ religion (Scientology) by so many unable to understand the frailty of their own thinking.

The gross embarrassment to the people of the world is many elected representatives are so gullible they failed to do simple research and analyse the hoax used by many to make millions from renewables, and will make billions if a carbon trading scheme is introduced

Their naivety and lack of analyses has wasted billion on renewables and forced electricity cost to unaffordable levels with devastating results upon many families and business.

The above if graphed correctly would look like this one below.

http://www.randombio.com/co2.html

The vertical axis starts at zero.

http://www.randombio.com/co2.html

Measurements taken at Mauna Loa in Hawaii

http://cdiac.ess-dive.lbl.gov/trends/co2/recent_mauna_loa_co2.html

The two graphs above start at zero ppm showing the CO2 rise is not alarming at all. This evidence shows you have been seriously mislead, deceived and governments conned into spending billions of your money unnecessarily.

CO2 CLOSE TO LOWEST LEVELS EVER FOR OUR PLANET

The parliament has been deliberately misleading and deceived into committing fraudulent financial gain for renewable industries

Stop the ruinous financial waste on renewables and build new high-tech clean coal power or nuclear stations and make electricity affordable.

Facts / Summary

The current CO2 level of 380 ppm is at the extreme low end of the past 600 million years. Plants and therefore most life will die if CO2 falls below 180 ppm. Plants thrive at 1,200 ppm.

Most plants, especially the complex vascular plants evolved in the last 300 million years. The average level of atmospheric CO2 over that period was approximately 1,200 ppm.

CO2 has been as high at 7,000 ppm, or 17.5x today’s level and the earth has NEVER in 600 million years experienced catastrophic global warming, NEVER.

Over the past 600 million years, CO2 and Temperature simply aren’t correlated, and regardless of the level of CO2, temperatures cap out around 22 Degrees C.

Video: Climate Scientist Caught Lying To Australian Public.

SHARE

46 COMMENTS

  1. Off topic — but… The relevance with this Climate Change article on CO2, is maybe the nurse’s problem was exacerbated by not breathing in enough OXYGEN.

    • They are ramping up the fear propaganda lately I notice and I wonder what stupid things they could really get the average Mr & Mrs Bloggs to do if they pushed it

  3. What got me about this footage is what her eyes express: – experiencing a strange sensation which was not part of the script, then a realisation and then fear.
    With the right creative marketing this could thwart Gate’s agenda.

  5. on topic
    These climate theses are quite good but promoting clean coal is not on, clean coal is a scam
    Is clean coal paying for these stories ? Clean coal is designed only to clean out treasuries

    • Like the two towers spontaneously collapsing perfectly into their own footprint all I can say is that you only have to look at it and see the official story is BS. You can’t get energy from expanding gases then pump the same gases underground and still have any energy left over, it’s absurd, before you even consider things like ground water contamination and drilling costs. Privately owned solar and pumped hydro is a much better equation despite what nonsense some people say about the panels recycling. Recycling in Australia is a joke, the places seem to get set on fire when they’re full. The international climate convention is a joke, Australia has so much solar uptake and Malcolm Trumbull started Snowy 2.0 for massively scaled pumped hydro and Australia gets kicked out of the climate convention, this is because the CC is simply designed to clean out government treasuries with their carbon-credit rackets, we are too busy sucking up to the US and China to need to suck up to Eurozone.
      It would be pointless to do anything useful in this world when there are so many other ways to make megabucks, much more and much faster. On the human scale, for example, why learn a trade when you can get $300/hr scamming the gullible as an accountant. Just learn to tell lots of lies &/or be a complete phoney and all sorts of great careers open up to you.

      • Modern coal fired power stations are very clean, exhaust gas is reburnt until clean with electronic monitors recording the scrubbing system, Farmers and industry in valleys back in the 1950’s water scrubbed the exhaust gas using waters systems with excellent results, modern systems are brilliant. Nearly all of the gas emissions shown on TV and in the press is water vapor from cooling towers.

  8. “Plants and therefore most life will die if CO2 falls below 180 ppm. Plants thrive at 1,200 ppm.” – As I recall, the 180ppm threshold is where most plants go dormant, that is, they stop growing. It is the 150ppm threshold where everything dies.

    Something that is significant is an ice age. Cold water will hold a lot more carbon dioxide than warm water. During the last Ice Age the oceans absorbed a lot of CO2 from the atmosphere and the level dropped from 230ppm to 180ppm. Had it dropped to 150ppm, you wouldn’t be reading this as it would have been an extinction level event.

    • i think they have tried to replace Carbon monoxide (the real killer) with the CO2 data. i wonder if the die-offs in the ocean and the culling of forests are related to the low levels of CO2. maybe the green team forgets that we symbiotic with plants so they need co2 and we need their O. i am under the impression that diesel engines are better for the environment than gas due to nitrogen sulfide release (like a volcano) vs light unburned hydrocarbons (mostly consisting of hydrogen). then the real tragedy would occur during periods of lull in the jet stream due to stratification… in terms of clean coal, it is my understanding that we just crack the pollution with steam until it meets a an EPA standard for burn-off( the little flames at the stink factories). the rest is scraped off the sides and added to our water supply as fluoride and our food chain as preservatives. I work on flow meters for all of these industries but what i know i was taught from these same industrial behemoths…

      • Decades ago everyone knew carbon monoxide was toxic then the car industry cleaned it up along with the leaded petrol. Now as you say, by MSM decree they have transferred the toxicity to harmless CO2, at the same time they say other gases such as methane are far worse “greenhouse gases” by a factor of 10 or 100. So what we have is an industry, the climate industry, with leaders who fly around the world to conferences, and allocate government spending via “carbon credits”, a sort of parallel monetary system based on a nonsense. We see bitcoin has gone over $20k US, another parallel monetary system useful to international criminals and tax avoiders and not 100% sure who else. Other systems exist such as voucher cards for phones etc, frequent flyer points, bank created e-money, all of these parallel money systems are created with an understanding that they can undermine “legal tender” of the host nation, by creating as much credit as the system will allow, for as long as possible. Carbon credits seems to be one of these scams, it seems not to relate to anything useful, despite the hysteria whipped up by the MSM who can be easily shown to be lying, as they fail to inform how the coral reefs are actually being ruined by superphosphate runoff, instead they mock Bob Katter and any others who will tell the truth.

        • Actually, there’s almost as much Carbon Monoxide(CO) from car exhausts today (per litre of petrol used) as there was before.
          (Try locking yourself in the garage with the engine running and see how long before you’re dead).

          Carbon Monoxide comes about from incomplete combustion and, notwithstanding the advances in combustion technology, some of it is still going to occur.

          The improvements in exhaust emissions have largely been the removal of lead during the transition to unleaded petrol and somewhat reduced levels of the oxides of nitrogen and sulphur.

  10. Even the CO2/global warming thing is based on a false premise

    In order to single out certain atmospheric gases and demonise them as the culprits responsible for atmospheric warming, it was necessary to attribute certain characteristics to the so called “Greenhouse Gases” with regard to radiant heat which would set them apart from the two most abundant atmospheric gases, Oxygen and Nitrogen.

    In his memoirs entitled “Contributions to Molecular Physics in the Domain of Radiant Heat”,

    https://archive.org/details/contributionsto00tyndgoog

    detailing a series of experiments conducted at the Royal Institution, Tyndall fallaciously states with regard to Oxygen and Nitrogen that they are both quote: “practically transparent to radiant heat.” Thus laying the foundations of AGW fraud.

    This statement by John Tyndall is the origin of such claims as “the science is settled” and the “greenhouse effect is 150 year old established physics.” In terms of radiant heat it is the only factor that would differentiate between the various atmospheric gases.

    After all, Oxygen and Nitrogen constitute 99% of the atmosphere. If these two gases are shown to absorb and re-emit infrared radiation, what would make so called “Greenhouse Gases” like CO2, such a threat to the environment at only 0.0385% of the atmosphere?

    So the basis for the “Greenhouse Effect” is that incoming and out going IR is not absorbed by Oxygen and Nitrogen which instead passes straight through these gases. According to this unsubstantiated hypothesis, only those gases which are termed “Greenhouse Gases” possess the capability to absorb and re-emit infrared radiation.

    The problem for the hypothesis of the “Greenhouse Effect” and of course AGW itself is that the basic premise on which the hypothesis is based is false.

    Firstly, Oxygen and Nitrogen both have higher specific heat capacities than CO2.
    For verification see here:

    https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/specific-heat-capacity-gases-d_159.html

    Secondly and above all, Oxygen and Nitrogen, of course do indeed absorb infrared radiation:
    https://www.coe.ou.edu/sserg/web/Results/Spectrum/o2.pdf

  11. Shades of Nauru — or something else? …

    Dec 18 Press Release — Asylum Cooperative Agreement with Honduras Finalized

    The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced that the United States and Honduras have concluded the implementation accords for the Asylum Cooperative Agreement (ACA) signed in September 2019. Under the ACA, certain migrants requesting asylum or similar humanitarian protection at the U.S. border may be transferred to Honduras to seek protection in Honduras.

    • What a surprise Criss X, that this particular ethnicity would be pulling the strings.
      Who would’ve guessed.

      Meanwhile, back her in Oz, the MSM likes rolling out Australia’s ‘Chief Scientist’ Alan Finkel whenever anyone questions the bogus Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) narrative :

      https://ajn.timesofisrael.com/finkel-named-victorian-year/

      No prizes for guessing what subset of society he hails from. (The article states Finkel is a ‘Mount Scopus old boy and St Kilda synagogue congregant’).

      A lot of people assume that the ‘Chief Scientist’ is the country’s leading scientific entity, when in fact he is nothing more than a political appointee – with a not particularly distinguished resume in a field totally unrelated to Climate Science (unlike say MIT’s Prof Richard Lindzen or Princeton’s Prof William Happer).

      Finkel was appointed (no doubt via the influence of the kingmaker of Australia’s Deep State – Mark Leibler), because he’s a yes man that’s willing to follow the ZWO script of Climate Alarmism.

      Similarly, when you see a particular Premier of an Australian state alongside his ‘Chief Medical Officer’ reaffirming that, for example, an outbreak of 10 or 20 cases of Covid (aka the common cold – assuming they weren’t mostly false positives) on Sydney’s northern beaches constitutes an emergency, you can bet London to a brick that said Chief Medical Officer was appointed because he is willing to prostitute himself and say anything if …….. ‘The Price is Right’.

      • Remember our Chief Commissioner of the Climate Commission, the Commission abolished abruptly by the Abbott government?
        Britannica.com: Tim Flannery, byname of Timothy Fridtjof Flannery (b 28 Jan 1956, Melbourne), Australian zoologist and outspoken environmentalist, named Australian of the Year in 2007 in recognition of his role as an effective communicator in explaining environmental issues and in bringing them to the attention of the Australian public….. “With his international best seller The Weather Makers: The History & Future Impact of Climate Change (2005), Flannery became the most prominent of Australia’s scientists arguing for measures to reduce carbon-dioxide emissions.”
        Strange? Fridtjof derives from an Old Norse name Friðþjófr meaning “thief of peace” (www.behindthename.com)
        Interviewed by SMH in 2014, in response to whether the staying power of climate-change sceptics surprized him: “the history of science teaches us people will long be convinced by fallacious arguments…”
        According to wiki, “Flannery was raised in a Catholic family”

  14. on topic
    I just have to marvel that the Swedish expert subject of the main video (guest of alan jones) at about 8:00 says the sea level around Europe is “not rising more than about 1mm per year while around the equator it is not rising at all”. Thailand made a similar claim years ago and I laughed thinking this is just normal Thai logic. So how do the Europeans stop their sea water from spreading out due to gravity, and after 50 years, will their sea level be 50mm higher while at the equator it remains the same? If he is saying Sweden is sinking, why doesn’t he say that? All these experts are obviously overpaid, if they were underpaid they would go away.

  15. This isn’t climate related but some of you may get something out of this.

    I’m not one for government run healthcare, not for government run anything under normal circumstances.

    But the U.S is not normal. It is the epicentre of abnormality.

    I can see why millions are peeved in the U.S, a country that can afford to spend a trillion each year on the military, can afford to finance concurrent foreign wars and sustain over 900 military bases in 130 countries (not to mention trillions for bailouts of cronies and campaign donors), YET can’t afford to provide free healthcare for the bulk of Americans.

    AOC (Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez) was interviewed by Jimmy Dore when she was running for Congress and she promised Medicare For All (M4A) as her core priority.
    Jimmy’s show, a widely viewed platform, was a significant contributing factor in getting AOC elected.

    Now that AOC’s in Congress, she’s a compliant little pussy and does whatever Nancy Pelosi tells her to. ie: AOC has reneged on her pledge to fight for M4A.

    In the video below, Jimmy Dore gives her (and Bernie Sanders and other corporate Dems), a piece of his mind, the likes of which you’ll be hard pressed to replicate (watch the first 10 minutes if you can, but at the very least watch from 6:30 – 11:15) :

    Jimmy is well and truly left of centre. That said, if Dems in Congress don’t represent him and the working class, if they’re no longer the anti-war party (of course they’re not – both parties are slightly different factions of the same party that represents the oligarchs and no one else in America), Jimmy will tear into you like a junk yard dog.

    And rightly so.

    I don’t agree with a lot of things Jimmy says but there’s one thing you can’t say about him.

    You can’t say he’e not insincere, you can’t say he’s beholden to anyone.

    He is the real deal.

    A rare commodity these days in a sea of internet disinfo and scripted B.S.

  18. “I will add, that the man who never looks into a newspaper is better informed than he who reads them; inasmuch as he who knows nothing is nearer to truth than he whose mind is filled with falsehoods and errors.”

    Thomas Jefferson, June 14 1807

C'mon Leave a Reply, Debate and Add to the Discussion

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.