The mainstream media seemed fairly comfortable reporting on NSA Whistle-blower, Edward Snowden. But be guaranteed much of the Australian mainstream media, especially the Murdoch press, and even radio personalities like Jon Faine will not be comfortable reporting on this NSA Whistleblower Bill Binney.
So who is Bill Binney?
He was the former senior technical director, 32-year NSA veteran widely regarded as a “legend” within the agency, one of the world’s top crypto-mathematicians, who managed thousands of employees at the agency.
Well, what is he now saying – now that we are close to another 11 September anniversary?
Binney, who recently signed Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth’s petition, stated:
‘There is clearly evidence that needs to be considered in a review of what happened in 9/11. We the public deserve an honest complete review of the facts with scientific interpretation and implications as to what really happened’
Why is this important for Australia? Because 9-11 shaped the world we live in now. Going into Iraq was a fraud, that has in the end resulted in ISIS. But as more people surface questioning the reality, the closer we will come to exposing the official lie (and the possible perpetrators).
Slowly slowly catchy monkey.
Binney also joins many high-level officials – including military leaders, intelligence officials and 9/11 commissioners – who are dissatisfied with the 9/11 investigations to date.
For background on Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, watch this C-Span interview and this documentary.
Postscript: Government officials agree that 9/11 was state-sponsored terrorism … they just disagree on which state was responsible.
Yep – they ‘pulled’ the buildings.
Why is it such a big deal that they ‘pulled’ building 7? Why wouldn’t just say – yep, we were worried, so we pulled it? I don’t understand the need to deny that. Please explain.
If they admit that the building was brought down by “Pulling it” they would also have to admit the building was set up for demolition prior to 09/11/01..
Thanks Bill – that makes complete sense to me now, and that also the implication would be the other buildings could have also been pre-set up for demolition!
That is exactly right Andrea. One admission leads directly to another. God Bless.
Yep. Absolutely right. The main reason is that it takes about 2 weeks to plant the detonations on each pillar.
Delving even deeper into the comment I wonder, Why would anyone ask Siverstein to make the decision to pull it? Ex mayor Guillione is also on record making the same pull it comment. He is head of emergency management which has blast proof offices in WTC #7. The offices are abandoned long before any need to do so. Both deny that “pull it” means demolish it! The list of tenants of WTC #7 is a short list of who probably done it and the records stored in WTC #7 is indicative of why. Anyone who sees this collapse as anything other than controlled demolition is a fool………………..
[…] September 1, 2014 by Dalia Mae 2 Comments […]
[…] more articles on 9-11 on gumshoenews. Whistleblower; Degrees of evil; Bob McIlvaine; Listen to Experts; Hijacking America’s […]